394: THE JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: TAKING THE NAME OF FRAUDS?

393

THE JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:

TAKING THE NAME OF FRAUDS?

The Supreme Court of India, on 9 July 2015, transferred the so-called Vyapam (Vyavsayik Pariksha Mandal) investigation to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

The matter is that the Government of Madhya Pradesh had been selecting candidates for job and higher studies by substituting answer papers with fake ones.

36 people- related to the case- died since the matter came to light in 2013. 2000 persons have been arrested so far.

A bench comprising Chief Justice of India H.L.Dattu, Justice Arun Mishra and Justice Amitava Roy heard the case.

The bench said that it would not allow any more deaths.

The Chief Justice of India had pretended to give Freedom.

But now he reneges.

Therefore, the bench has no credibility.

The probe will not reach its logical conclusion.

The first bench of the Madras High Court comprising Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice T S Sivagnanam , on 8 July 2015, dismissed a PIL (Public Interest Litigation) that sought to find out the toxic chemicals in the liquor but asked the authorities to carry out a quality check and inform the results to the petitioner, a Mr. Devarajan, within a month.

Mr. Devarajan had been pursuing the matter for three years before filing the petition.

The media reported the matter only after the present man wrote to the Supreme Court of India to find out the presence of chemicals like chloral hydrate in the liquor.

The Chief Justice of India did not release the letter to the press.

Will not the people say that he withholds such pieces of information from the public with an ulterior motive?

Mr. Ram Jethmalinai, senior advocate, opposed the National Judicial Appointment Commission (NJAC) Act in the Supreme Court of India during the resumed hearing on 7 July 2015.

Citing the British criterion, he wanted the court to invite applications. He added that in England the candidates have a right to know the reasons for rejection.

          The Hindu –for the first time on 9 July 2015- used the word “arbitrary” in connection with the case. It came out with a central page article supporting the NJAC.

          The object of the article was to circumvent the word arbitrary.

          No one used the word “arbitrary” during the hearing.

The present man pointed out it.

Now, The Hindu pretends that the word lacks meaning.

          The media said that the court cannot strike down the NJACA.

          This is their decree to the Supreme Court of India.

          Perhaps, after taking orders from the back room players, the bench, on 9 July 2015, said the NJAC could frame the rules.

          This is to wriggle out from the present writer.

          But it is not like selecting clerks.

          The judges are the representatives of the Almighty.

          Actually, they determine the Freedom.

          The NJAC is not a rule making body.

          The Parliament can do this after giving Freedom.

Even it cannot make “family integrity” a rule.

          Further, those making the rules cannot execute them.

          Therefore, the learned judges cannot approve arbitrary selection.

          If they dare to do, they will take the name of frauds.

This is letter No.394.

 This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 11 July 2015

11- 7-2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.