Monday, June 13, 2016

509:ENGLAND: PUBLIC OPINION AND INDIVIDUAL OPINION

509

ENGLAND: PUBLIC OPINION AND INDIVIDUAL OPINION

          On 12 June 2016, THE NEW INDIAN EXPRESS, published an article titled “Decoding Modi’s world dominance” by Mr. S. Gurumurthy.
          Gurumurthy said that Mr. Modi did not apply for the US visa but he royally entered the US as India’s Prime Minister. He observed that never in its diplomatic history with India was the US ever embarrassed as much as when it had to roll out red carpet to the very person it had ostracized for a decade.
          Earlier Mr. Modi had royally entered Buckingham Palace as India’s Prime Minister to the total embarrassment of the Queen of England. The Queen had not paid a visit to India to declare open the Delhi Commonwealth Games.
          It must be noted that Mr. Modi  entered these places not due to his merit but due to the power of his promoters.
          Further, Gurumurthy said that India’s stature and influence today match China’s.
          It must be again noted that the foreign exchange reserve of China is ten times higher than that of India.       
He, further, said:
1.                                     Mr. Modi got 10 standing ovations and 69 clapping interventions during his address to the US Congress on June 12, 2016.
2.                                     Many Congressmen queued up for his autograph.
3.                                     Modi delivered an extempore speech.
4.                                     His rallies abroad were well attended by Indians.
5.                                     He is tactically moving out and conquering the world.
6.                                     Wall Street Journal said, “Leader wins warm reception from US law makers.
7.                                     Modi has emerged as the chief strategist for India.
8.                                     He U-turned the world in his favour.
9.                                     The CNN said that Modi’s journey to global stardom was no accident.
10.                                The New York Times said that he had puzzled many.
11.                                The Telegraph of the UK highlighted how Modi transformed himself from pariah to rock star world leader.
12.                                In 2015, US President Obama wrote an article titled “Modi and I” in the Time magazine. He saw Modi’s journey from poverty to prime minister as India’s rise.
13.                                British Prime Minister David Cameron described Modi as the most popular man on planet.
14.                                Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin praised Modi as a reputable political leader.
15.                                The Australian Prime Minister, Mr. Tony Abbott hailed India under Modi as the “emerging democratic super power in Asia”.
16.                                The global media baron, Rupert Murdoch, described Modi as “the best leader with best policies since (India’s) independence.
17.                                The pictures of the prime minister with the major world leaders like Barack Obama in the US, Angela Merkel in Germany also create an image back home that Modi is a world player promoting India as a global power.
Based on the above and many other points, Gurumurthy said that Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi is among the tallest world leaders.
Similar views by various writers permeate the world.
In contrast, the present man says that Mr. Modi  is unfit to hold power.
If it is factually correct, the people must have a chance to know this view also. This does not happen.
But The New Indian Express, in the same article, says that that Modi needs no seer to tell him that in all democracies the popularity of a leader with the people is the real test.
What the newspapers and the TV channel say is news for the people. Here, the private opinion appears as public opinion. Therefore, Mr. Modi is very popular.
The views by the common people are not news for the people. They go down as individual opinions.
 If a man has a few TV channels and newspapers, he can air his views through them subject to the overall supervision by the ruling class.. His individual views then become popular views. He could be construed as a leader.
But Modi owned no newspaper or TV channels. His contribution to national life also was not a significant one. Yet, the media all over the world had been discussing him long before he seized power at the centre.
Why did the media discuss him and not the views of the present man?
The reason is simple. It is profitable to them. Mr. Modi considers this as his merit.
After assuming power as the Prime Minister of India Mr. Modi proved tellingly that he is unfit to hold power. All right thinking people going through this work would agree with this.
This is the condition in England.
This is letter No. 509
This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 13 June 2016.

13  June-2016.

V. Sabarimuthu,
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 




No comments: