526. The Pellet Guns in Kashmir and the Self Preservation.

526

The Pellet Guns in Kashmir and the Self Preservation.

          The Government of India, on 18 August 2016, reiterated its decision to merge three banks with the State Bank of India (SBI). The motive behind the decision was mentioned earlier in this work. Now, it may be mentioned that the decision is an unconstitutional one.

          The Union Government, on 19 August 2016, reiterated its decision to divert a part of the Provident Fund (PF) to the stock market.

          The assets of all companies that use this money belong to the Government.

The Union Government, on 20 August 2016, decided to appoint Mr. Urjit Patel,  one of the four Deputy Governors of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) as the next Governor of the RBI.

          It must be noted that he had been in the Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) for some time.

          Now, it is his duty to use the Provident Fund and the Pension Fund for large scale public investments.

          Further, he must reveal the whereabouts of the money extracted for imports.

          The Hindu, on 22 August 2016, revealed that 1.3 million pellets were fired in Kashmir in a month.

          The thinking of the Government is to substitute pellet guns with chilli- powder guns.

          Consistent with Article 16, the Government of India should have granted a definite quota of seats to Kashmir in civil services, IITs and others.

          Instead, it takes away their seats in the pretext of entrance test and others.

          It cheats them of their money through the stock market and others.

          Above all, they have no political rights. The people of India cannot hear the voice of their eminent men.

          Thus,  the Prime Minister of India gives the assets and the seats to his promoters but the pellet guns to the people of Kashmir.

          These are specific human rights problems.

          The Chief Justice of India and the other learned judges of the Supreme Court of India are blind to the above. They know against whom the chilli powder should be used.

          The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in its order dated 29 -6-2016 (Letter No.499) held that the letter dated 16 -05- 2016 did not make out any specific violation of human rights. In conclusion, the NHRC informed the present man that “the complaint is filed and the case is closed”.

          In this connection, the NHRC must note the following.

          One day, the Supreme Court of India cancelled the petrol outlets sanctioned by the Members of Parliament. Among other things, the court considered this as an act of corruption.  Next day, a private company opened hundreds of petrol outlets all over India. The present man pointed out this. Neither did the court allow the people to know the points raised by the present man nor did it rectify the illegality.

          Again, one day the present man said that the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) would be sold against public money only. Next day, a private company bought the public sector VSNL against the money taken from the public sector Bank of India (BoI). The VSNL still remains in the hand of that private company.

          The guidelines devised for privatization barred the charge-sheeted companies from buying the PSUs. But some PSUs were sold to the charge-sheeted companies. The present man pointed out this to the Supreme Court of India. But they still languish under private hands.

          The present Union Government now hands over the public resources like coal to the promoters of the Prime Minister of India.

          The law must be impersonal. The body responsible for making the laws shall not carry them out. But the Supreme Court of India makes its own strange laws and carries them out. Thus, the court arbitrarily appointed hundreds of judges. Here, the judges do not understand the meanings of the words ‘impersonal’ and ‘arbitrary’.

Now the criterion for appointing a judge is recommendation. In fact, the word ‘recommendation’ is patently used. No wonder, no judge qualified to enforce freedom of expression has been so for appointed. In fact, the judges so appointed do not know the meaning of freedom of expression.

          In a judgment, the Supreme Court of India says that the admission must be based on the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET).

          The performance of the students mainly depends on the syllabus, their teachers and their parents.

          If the court has the right to enforce a uniform examination all over India, it has the right to enforce a uniform syllabus for this. The court does not exercise this right.

          The Government –quite unconstitutionally and in bad-faith alienated the money in the Pension Fund and Provident Fund. What happened to this money is not known.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) together with the Government of India extracts a huge amount of money for imports. What happens to this money also is not known.

          There is a two tier system to disseminate news and views.

          In the state level, the newspapers and the TV channels are free to discuss any state level politics. The discussion conveys the message that there are no other serious problems in India.

          The owners of the newspapers and the TV channels are very careful to project their hired men alone as all India leaders.

          The people are not allowed to see the contribution of many others for nation building.

Naturally, their hired men alone are being asked to rule India.

          Some underground moles control everything.

          Once, the Supreme Court of India stumbled upon these underground moles. But it buried them in the court.

          The court might have done it for a ransom. Or it might have done it as an act of thanksgiving.  

These and hundreds of other specific violations of human rights have been mentioned in this work.

Now a former chief justice of India heads the NHRC. He did not do anything concrete to enforce freedom of expression during his stint in the Supreme Court of India.

As self preservation is the prime Law of Nature, he would play a complementary role to perpetrate this system.

However, assume that everything mentioned above is imaginary.

525 letters roll in the hand of the NHRC. Do the people of India know this?

They do not know this.

The present man has no way to know the similar works of others.

The people are mere animals.

This is a grave but specific human rights problem.

This is letter No.526

          This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 22.8- 2016.

22 August 2016.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.