530
THE
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:
EMITTING
A FOUL MESSAGE, SICKENING TO THE SENSES?
The New Indian Express, on 10 September
2016, published an article titled, “If the salt has lost its savour wherewith
shall it be salted?” by a Mr.Sudhish Pai.
In
that article, the paper said that secrecy is the bulwark of corruption. It
wanted the court to inform the happenings to the people to fulfill the
constitutional guarantee of free-speech.
529
letters have been submitted to the Chief Justice of India. But the court is not
ready to inform it to the people.
What
is the reason for this?
A
few representatives of the IAS officer’s Association met Prime Minister of
India Mr. Narendra Modi, on 10
September 2016, and sought his intervention to save some innocent officers. They
were silent about the action taken against some officers in the Tamil Nadu
State.
Do they desert the officers caught in Tamil Nadu?
But
the disproportionate assets of the officers have not been identified.
Does
the system exert any pressure over the Government of Tamil Nadu?
Nothing
is known.
A
newspaper, on 10 September 2016, hinted that China is undertaking a survey of
the Delhi- Chennai corridor for the bullet train.
This
means that India is duty-bound to surrender this corridor to China.
Thus
China entered India not through the north but through the south.
China
entered India in an imperceptible way. However, the Government consciously did
it. But it did not want the people to know it.
If
a patriot like Mr. Narendra Modi
converts India into a slave nation of China, it must be for the good of the
nation. So the people need not know about this good fortune. This is the stand
of the Supreme Court of India.
But
the court must know that China gives more than $ 10 billion per year as commission
to some people. This money is sufficient to buy the entire world.
If
the court is not aware of it, it can remain quiet.
If
a citizen of India points out this to the court, it can reject this as a
figment of imagination and explain the assets of the people or take the matter
to its logical conclusion.
If
there is a doubt about the correctness or otherwise of the submission, it can
publish the letters and initiate a public discussion.
But
the court protects the present condition.
Does
it think that there is no commission in bulk buying?
Through
its silence, the court emits a foul message, sickening to the senses.
This
is letter No.530
This
letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme
Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air
Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com
on 13-9- 2016.
13-9-
2016.
V.
Sabarimuthu,
26-3
Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.
No comments:
Post a Comment