541
The
Marina Uprising and the Supreme Court of India.
The present man sent the last letter,
on 21 January 2017, just to prevent any outward incident anywhere in Tamil Nadu
as a result of the Marina Uprising.
Unfortunately, the letter triggered
some outward incidents on 22 January 2017.
There was a sea of humanity on the
Marina beach. Many put the number around 15 lakh. If the Chief Justice of India
had openly agreed to redress their genuine grievances, everyone might have left
the place very happily.
Apparently, the Chief Justice of India
asked a retired judge to assuage the feelings of the people. The latter described
the problem as a question of law and indirectly tried to impart a good image to
the judiciary.
However, different sections of the crowd dared
to place other demands such as the public resources as mentioned in the last
letter. Due to the thinking that any more defeat would mean eternal disgrace, the
police was asked to disperse the crowd forcefully. The police being police made
a day of it.
Thus the uprising came to an end after
six days.
At one stage, a section of the crowd
threatened to jump into the sea. The waves washed away only one boy. Had the
police pushed them further, the sea might have consumed a large number of
people.
Further, the police kept their guns in
their vans and no firing occurred.
The demands of the crowd had all India
character. They were directed against the Supreme Court of India.
Further, one cannot stand on the
sea-shore for more than two hours. The crowd was there for six days. It is
perilous to sit before an unpredictable sea. No child should have lost his
precious life for a national cause.
On the whole, Chief Minister of
Tamil Nadu Mr. Paneerselvam must be
commended for the way he handled the situation mainly because of the latent
nature of the real enemy. In fact, all right thinking people heaved a sigh of
relief. The Supreme Court of India is indebted to him in this matter.
However, the Supreme Court of India
shall not defeat the purpose of the uprising.
It must be stated that the Supreme
Court of India considers many constitutional things as unconstitutional and
vice versa.
Therefore, everyone thinks something
is wrong in some place. As the media shields the judiciary, the people are
unable to pin point the real culprit.
It is a well known fact that the mark
obtained by a candidate in an examination is not the sole index of intelligence. Therefore, state wise reservation is a must for
the IITs, IIMs, IIFT, All India Services and for the Public Sector Undertakings
such as banks.
The judges of the Supreme Court of
India hail from different places in India. What harm would it accrue to them if
they give to their own children in Punjab, Kerala, Kashmir and Assam a definite
share in the total seats? Will it do any injustice to anyone? Does anything in
the Constitution prohibit this? Is it not the spirit of the Constitution of
India? Does not Article 16 demand it? Does the nation require an uprising for
it?
The public resources must be for
public welfare. But the court enables a few people to exploit everything, deny
democracy and allow them to rule India.
These were the most important demands
of the protesters. The courts- in effect- ironically depict the protesters as
anti-social elements and sit in a safe distance.
The present Chief Justice of India
would not openly accept responsibility for the uprising. However, he must
realize his responsibility and redress all the genuine grievances of the people
before his retirement.
The sea
washed away a boy. Apparently, it happened during the police action. A memorial
near the existing memorials at Marina is a must for that boy because he
sacrificed his life for all Indians. The Chief Justice of India must see this also
before his retirement.
The High Court, Chennai and the
National Human Rights Commission, on 25 January 2017, sent notices to explain
the human rights violations during the Marina uprising.
As the people did not create any law
and order problem by sitting before the High Court or the Human Rights
Commission, the court could send notice like this. This deflects the attention
of the people to other matters.
In fact, the courts and the Human
Rights Commission created this situation by denying democracy.
Former judge of the Supreme Court of
India Santosh Hegde, on 25 January
2017, wanted to know the source of Re.160 crore worth assets of a political leader in
the Karnataka state.
Mr. Hegde functioned as a judge of the Supreme Court of India from 1999 to 2005. During
this period, he helped convert a number of Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs)
into private assets. In fact, maximum manipulations occurred during his stint
in the court.
Further, a judge of the Supreme
Court would understand the nature of a case before him within 10 minutes. But he
concealed all letters received from the present man. Now he talks like this!
Former Union Minister Mr. Sarad Pawar was conferred a Padma award on 26 January 2017.
The Wikileaks said that he had a huge amount of money in the foreign
banks. Mr. Pawar did not deny this allegation. The Supreme Court of India
did not give him a clean chit either.
Many other leaders keep a huge amount
of money in the foreign banks. They also might be given suitable awards
consistent with their money.
The
Association for Democratic Reforms,
on 26 January 2017, said that the Indian political parties are receiving a huge
amount of money from unknown sources. It put their total income from 2005 to
20014 at Re.11,367 crore. Even small parties received over Re.200 crore during
this period.
The income is not from unknown
sources. Every IAS officer and every judge of the Supreme Court and High Court
knew this. Or, the CBI will tell the source within 24 hours.
Every person in charge of removing the
public resources is the source. But they are super Sekher Reddy like people.
The Supreme Court of India protects them because its objective - till date- is
denial of freedom. The present Chief Justice of India might change it.
This is
letter No.541
The facts from 22 January 2017 to 26 January 2017 are
being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of
India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and
posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 27-1-2017.
27-1-2017.
V.
Sabarimuthu,
26-3
Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.
No comments:
Post a Comment