CHAPTER 153. PRIDE AND FALSE PRESTIGE

153

PRIDE AND FALSE PRESTIGE

          The last mail was submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 31 August 2010.

The Union Government allocated the 3G spectrum to the private operators on 1 September 2010. The Government amended the terms and conditions slightly in deference to Chapter 151. Accordingly, the private operators could use the spectrum for the next 20 years only. Therefore, the Government now wants to convince this writer that it is not a sale or auction but a tenancy only.

 The tenancy of the Government is for five years only. Naturally, the tenancy for 20 years is out and out unconstitutional. In this matter, there is no difference between 20 years and 200 years.

The 7 May 2010 judgment of the Supreme Court (SC) clearly says that all natural resources must remain under the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). The Government is construing this as a suggestion only. As the Government did not file an appeal, it is now an order of the SC. The Government must be bound it.

In the recent Rotting Grain case mentioned in the previous Chapter, the Government first chose to ignore the suggestion of the SC. The SC then asked the Government to consider the suggestion as an order. Obeying this, the Government on 2 September 2010 decided to release the rotting food grains to the Below Poverty Line (BPL) families within six months.  The order is a small routine duty of the learned judges of the SC. But it is 2.5 million tonne of food grains for the BPL families. As the 7 May 2010 judgment is far more important than this judgment, the SC must order the Government to take over all natural assets, including the spectrum, forthwith. By doing this, the SC is not obeying this writer at all. It is paying respect to its own judgment only.

None need point out the meaning of the judgment to Her Excellency the President of India. In 1788 Tippu Sultan invaded Malabar. The noble families of Malabar took refuge in Travancore. The incensed Sultan demanded the surrender of the fugitives. The King of Travancore said that the principles of hospitality did not permit him to give up those helpless persons. Thus the King risked not only a war but also his freedom.

 Now, the Constitution of India is taking refuge under the President. The ruler –through her facial expressions- demands the President to surrender the Constitution of India. The people are helpless in this matter. They could seek the protection of the President only. The President should not give up 1000 million people - seeking protection under her - by surrendering the Constitution of India to the ruler.

The Militant people on 1 September 2010 kidnapped four policemen in the Bihar State. They wanted the Government to release 8 militant people in jail in exchange for the release of the hostages. On the next day, they killed one of the hostages in cold blood and extended the deadline for the next day. At the same time, the militant people killed a teacher in the West Bengal State. Three employees were killed in the Chhattisgarh State. The ruler of India did not respond to anything. The Prime Minister also did not express his view. This gave the impression that the Government was waiting for the slightest pretext to destroy the militant people through cluster bombing. Finally, the militant people released the three remaining hostages.

In this connection, it must be stated that the ruler kidnapped 1000 million people. Otherwise, she would not have transmitted about $1 trillion to private parties after denying FREEDOM.

The present situation must come to an end. For this, the ruler could consider the question of making the leader of the militant people the Prime Minister of India. The people have seen one extreme type of rule. Let them see the other. After all, the directors of the charge-sheeted private companies adorn the Union Cabinet now.

India, on 2 September 2010, said that about $8 billion had been disbursed as educational loan to 20 lakh students across India. This must be interpreted in the light of the Point No.9 of Chapter 36 of this work. Now, the Government could consider the question of introducing direct payment of salary to the teachers of “willing” colleges in India based on a sound criterion. Alternatively, teachers of one or two courses in every college could be brought under the ambit of direct payment. This would partially obviate the necessity to give loans. At the same time, it will help the Government to check the quality of the institutions. Entrepreneurship also would not be affected. The Government must be always dynamic in this matter.

India, on 2 September 2010, expressed its concern over the presence and activities of Chinese troops in Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK). China said that some people were fabricating stories to weaken Indo-China relations.

India raised the question of so -called stapled visa also. With which passport India allows the Tibetan refugees to travel to other countries? India must enlighten the people to know this.

Justice P. Sathasivam, a sitting judge of the Supreme Court, on 2 September 2010 said that the people were unable to hold the decision makers accountable or to challenge economic deprivation because justice is inaccessible to them. The message is not a clear one. Does the learned judge expect the people to appear in the Supreme Court for vital public matters?

A woman Superintendent of Police (SP) in the UP State noticed that some constables were demanding bribe from the truckers.  There were reports that the constables tried to crush her under their vehicle.

It must be noted that economic deprivation drives the people to do the unthinkable. For instance, a highway robber attaches no value to a man because he believes that the latter has no significance to him.

In this connection, everyone might have noticed the gun salute given to the slain policeman. The uniform of the police personnel indicates that the Government has no money to supply even a decent uniform to them. What would they do without money? In fact, constables all over India demand bribe from the truckers. It is their way of life.

Fearing the newspapers - THE NEW INDIAN EXPRESS and THE HINDU - if the present writer had stopped this work, someone studying in the Engineering College might have confronted this writer with a chopper. In fact, but for this work, anyone would have killed anyone. Now, some people are killing others.

Obviously, everyone must do his duty.

The ruler of India was re-elected as the President of the Congress Party. On this occasion, the ruler sat on a chair flanked by the Prime Minister of India and the Finance Minister of India. The ruler arranged some people of a tribal community to stand near her. The media was quick to describe her as an icon for the poor. Truly, the poor people adulate her. The ruler believes that this would add to her prestige.

In order to give a political ladder to her, the principal opposition party –the BJP- criticized her for opting for the record fourth term. The BJP takes trivial matters only. By concealing this work, it - in bad faith - “fixed” the last two general elections. It has been playing to lose again.

India and South Korea signed a MoU for co-operation in defence including research and development.  In this way, India seeks to nullify the effect of the naval base of China in Sri Lanka. Naturally, this might disturb China. The activities of Chinese troops in the PoK might be linked to this.

The Chief of the Air Staff awarded the honorary rank of Group Captain to Mr. Sachin Tendukar, the famous cricketer of India. The criterion for the selection is not known. The Olympic medalists could have been honored in a similar way. Anyhow, the first step has been taken. This might drive the Air Force to some unexpected places.

The Foreign Secretary of India, Mrs. Nirupama Rao, paid a visit to Sri Lanka for the firsthand assessment of the situation of the resettled Tamils. Tamils, in large numbers, attended her meetings. They forgot the simple fact that India was mainly responsible for the death of their bread winners.

The Foreign Secretary noticed the de-mining work of Indian soldiers. The number of land mines supplied to the freedom fighters by India could be envisaged.

On the eve of the Teachers Day, the Prime Minister, in his characteristic style, described the teachers as the most precious national resource.

The Army Chief, Gen. V.K. Singh, arrived in Sri Lanka on 5 September 2010 on a five day visit.

Referring to the Rotten Food Grain case mentioned in the previous chapter, the Prime Minister of India on 6 September 2010 said that the order of the SC to give free food grains to so many people - 37 per cent of the population - was not possible and, therefore, could not be implemented.

He tactfully clubbed the above with the remunerative price to farmers. He simply forgot that some State Governments are supplying quality food grains -practically free of cost - to all their citizens.  He also forgot that he reduced the import duty on rubber, palm oil and others to break the backbone of the farmers. Further, the SC does not stand in the way of giving remunerative price during procurement.

 The Prime Minister, further, advised the SC not to play any policy role. He added that the SC should not have interfered in the policy decisions of the Government. This writer pointed out this in the last letter.

 However, it must be noted that the Prime Minister was unnerved by the 7 May 2010 judgment and not by the Rotten Food Grain judgment at all. He has no courage to criticize the former judgment and therefore he chose the latter to attack the SC. Finally, he would implement the Rotten Food Grain judgment and try to ignore the 7 May 2010 judgment.

Notwithstanding the above, the SC should annul the judgment given in Chapter 3 to restore constitutionalism in India.

  

Further, the Prime Minister said that the Home Minister is enjoying his full confidence. This is his reply to the charge that some Union Ministers had received money from the private companies for various favours.

It must be noted that the Home Minister had been a director of a charge sheeted private company. The leader of the principal opposition party is not raking up this matter because they are also shareholders, directors and owners of private companies. The SC is not ready to touch this matter because many learned judges are attached to these companies. Thus, there is practically none to prevent them from taking the natural resources. In this situation, the President alone could prevent this organized plunder.

In this connection, it must be stated that owners of the charge sheeted companies have forfeited their moral and constitutional right to enter the Presidential Palace. Their presence in the Union Cabinet also is injurious to the administration of justice in India. The ruler, however, believes that any decision to drop them from the Union Cabinet would affect her reputation.

It is said that pride and false prestige govern the mind of the demons.

The facts from 1 September 2010 to 6 September 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 7 September 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU

   

CHAPTER 152. HORRIBLE WORKS

152

                                      HORRIBLE WORKS

          A Member of Parliament (MP) on 17 August 2010 said that the Government was giving bullets to farmers. The newspapers did not report it. However, this was reminiscent of Chapter 41.

          The officials of the Department of Excise on 20 August 2010 seized several big bars of silver, gold, platinum and palladium illegally sent by a private company called Sterlite  -  one of the companies of the UK based Vedanta -  to the Chennai port. Does this company import the ores of these metals? Does this company extract platinum and palladium using Indian ores? Does this company export these metals to convert Indian currency into foreign exchange?

Some present members of the Union Cabinet are the representatives or the share holders of this company. This company was a client of a present Union Minister in a case in the Bombay High Court. The ruler of India and her son are aware of this. Therefore, the gold might become copper. Platinum and palladium might become silver of different purities as in the Medical Council of India (MCI) case.   

Presenting the outstanding parliamentarian award, Her Excellency the President of India on 18 August 2010 - among other things - said that the MPs must:

11.     Take the nation forward in the direction of growth, equity and stability.

  2.     Not loose their way forward in the sound and fury.

 .3.     Respond to issues that impact public welfare.

 .4.     Meet the expectations of the people.

  5.     Not remain static.

     6Meet the challenges that require fresh thinking and innovative ideas.

  7.     Respond to serious national problems that require serious study, research and preparation.

 .8.     Meet exacting standards to set an example to the rest of the world.

 .9.     Find a solution by discussing differing views and interests.

.   10. Find an outcome through constructive and cooperative approach.

1   11.                        Be guided by a vision of progress for the nation

1 12.                         Be governed by integrity and tolerance in their conduct and

  13.                        Dare to do the right at all cost.

The above speech has no parallel in history. India, as usual, suppressed it. The present writer noticed it in the presidentofindiawebsite.

6 August -19 August 2010 issue of the BUSINESS & ECONOMY MAGAZINE disclosed that the Indian private companies bought assets worth US $ 50 billion in 2010 alone.

With which money the Indian companies buy assets abroad?  They buy using the profit from natural assets. Whose money is this? This is the money of the people.

Evidently, if India had used the paramilitary forces to take over natural assets; militancy would have disappeared from India long ago.

The former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh was arrested on 24 August 2010 for a corruption of about $220 million.

The Union Government on 24 August 2010 scrapped the environment clearance granted to the Vedanta for its aluminium refinery in the Orissa State. Further, the Government asked the company to give reason why its application to mine bauxite in Orissa should not be rejected.

India did not disclose the way followed by the Vedanta to enter India. The local people and some others have been, perhaps, pursuing this matter. However, being a charge sheeted company mentioned in Chapter 1, Vedanta would not have so silently began the mining work without the involvement of the present ruler of India and her son. Earlier, Sterlite had conquered the public sector BALCO in a swift action after breaking all defences of the Constitution of India.   

Obviously, a number of political leaders must be share holders of the above company although the exact figure for the Prime Minister and others is not disclosed. The key portfolios in the Union Cabinet went to the representatives of this company and one or two other companies only.  The ruler is even now fielding these ministers alone to answer the questions of the MPs in Parliament. A present minister had been a non executive director in the Vedanta with an annual disclosed salary of the US $ 70,000. The present Minister for Environment had been an adviser to him for some time. This is the reason why India wanted to destroy all suspected militant people using the military. Every death would produce some profit to the rulers.

The present ruler and her son might be ignorant of many things. But they inducted the above experts in the Union Cabinet for their above qualifications only. In fact, the Vedanta, Sterlite and the present ruler are one. Otherwise, their resignation would have preceded the above decision and the MPs sitting in the back benches would have taken charge. Now, the people associate the above ministers with the above decision.

Immediately after the above decision, the son of the ruler of India paid a visit to the mining site of Vedanta. He went there to celebrate the day as Tribal Rights Day! The girls of a tribal community in their traditional attire welcomed him and were seen walking with him. Ironically, they –as a group - appeared like a garland made for him. In fact, they were similar to the girl mentioned in Chapter 147. He, later, shared the dais with a leader of a militant organization.

The tribal people presented him with a bow and arrow presumably to fight the paramilitary forces. Accepting this, the leader congratulated the tribal people for successfully fighting the Vedanta. In this way, he condemned his mother for ruling India by repression. He was glad that the Union Government finally heard their voice. He rejected the view that the decision of the Government was against development. He added that his work as their soldier in New Delhi had just begun.

He, further, told them that the voice of the poor was rarely heard in India, while the voice of the rich was heard at various levels. Therefore, he expressed his view that the suppression of the voice of the poor must end.

In order to give a political ladder to him, the main opposition party questioned his wisdom of sharing the dais with a leader of the militant organization while the paramilitary personnel were sacrificing their lives in another place.

It is not easy to comprehend the subtleties of human behavior. According to Aristotle, a political leader might choose to be angry with the right person, in the right way, at the right time, and for the right reason. Therefore, due to some intuition, the son is angry with his mother for denying FREEDOM to Indians. In this case, India would strange him. Then, the people of India – as a body- will not hear anything about him.  No news or articles would come for or against him. This must be the end of his political career under the present manipulators.

Alternatively, India is projecting him as the savior of the tribal people only to deny FREEDOM to Indians. In this case, he is doing a horrible work.

On the next day, India executed a militant leader and suspect in a train sabotage case in the West Bengal State.

Now the Cairan Energy of the UK wanted to sell 62.37 percent shares of Cairan India to Vedanta for 9.6 billion. Cairan India is one of the private companies that exploit the oil and gas reserves of India.

In this connection, it must be reiterated that the 7 May 2010 judgment of the Supreme Court forbids even the Government to sell natural assets to any private parties. Cairan India cannot sell or inherit the natural assets of India. The Government must restore all natural assets to its owner –the people- without any delay.  The ruler of India would rush to all oil fields and mining sites to claim credit for it is a different matter.

Addressing a Conference of police officers, the Prime Minister of India on 26 August 2010 wanted to use non lethal weapons to deal with various agitations of the public. Chapter 147 chastened him to this extent.

In this connection, it must be pointed out that India has been consistently mentioning the following two points in the last six years.

1.     9 percent growth rate and

2.     The militant people are the only threat to the stability India.

      In fact, India wanted to extirpate the militant people through cluster bombing. Now, India is talking about non - lethal weapons!

          The Union Government on 27 August 2010 sent a four-member team to the POSCO steel plant in the Orissa State. This must be interpreted in the light of the 14 July 2010 judgment of the Orissa High Court mentioned in Chapter 149 and the reasoning presented in the Chapter 151.

The Prime Minister of India addressed the Conference of Heads of Missions on 27 August 2010. On this occasion, he said that India was engaging its neighbouring countries without looking for reciprocal actions.

On the same day, China denied visa to an Indian army officer to join a military delegation  because he was controlling the military operations in Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) State. This decision reinforced over the policy of China to give a different kind of visa called stapled visa to the people of the J&K State. India retaliated by cancelling high level military exchanges. Accordingly, India refused to allow two Chinese army officers to attend a defense course and another officer to address the officers of another defense course. India hinted that it would cancel the third “Hand-in-Hand” military exercise in October 2010.

China immediately rejected the above statement of India as the latter did not notify the decision to the former. China believes that India – as its slave- is not free to take the above decision.

Talks would solve many problems - not solved by even wars and joint military exercises. The Prime Minister could solve the problems pertaining to the border, stapled visa, naval bases and nuclear reactors by talking to his counterpart in China. A hot line has been created only to solve such problems and not to take orders from China.

The Prime Minister –instead of taking a firm stand - is pointing out the back room players at one time and the people of India at another time. This conclusion is based on the fact that India is even now exporting iron ore to China in the pretext of selling iron ore “fine”.

Now China would do anything for the following.

1.     The natural resources of India and

2.     Indian market.

China would even retreat from Sri Lanka for the above.     

In the mean time, Sri Lanka cancelled the visa on arrival policy granted to Indians. Fearing that India would try to substitute the Chinese labourers by the refugees after granting independence to the Tamils, Sri Lanka withdrew the order within 24 hours.

The militant people murdered ten paramilitary personnel in the Chhattisgarh and Bihar States on 28 August 2010. None in India reacted to this. India must tell the reason for this murder.

A Union Minister on 31 August 2010 declared in Parliament that India was monitoring the Chinese movements in Indian Ocean.

In this connection, it must be reiterated that India had invited China to Sri Lanka. In fact, India has been inculcating in the mind of the armed forces the view that the target of the armed forces must be the militant people in India and not the military bases of China around India.

The Supreme Court (SC) on 31 August 2010 directed the Union Government to distribute the rotting food grains to the poor.  The Supreme Court is forcing the Government to change its policy. Instead, the SC must impart knowledge to the people by giving FREEDOM. Then they would change their way of thinking. As a result they would change the rulers. Now the SC indirectly makes the people to believe that there are no people apart from them.

It is said that the demons engage in horrible works meant to destroy the world.

The facts from 16 August 2010 to 31 August 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 31 August 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU

     

CHAPTER 151. DEMONIAC LIFE

151

DEMONIAC LIFE

        Inaugurating the All India Seminar on Judicial Reforms, Her Excellency the President of India on 31 July 2010, among other things, said;

1.     The Judiciary must work for the greatest good of the greatest number.

2.     Judiciary must dispense justice fairly, promptly and transparently.

3.     Judiciary must notice the Preamble of the Constitution of India for establishing justice, equity, fair play and rule of law.

4.     Judiciary must treat every individual equally.

5.     The judiciary must protect and enforce by law the inviolable human dignity of every individual.

6.     The judiciary must seek unalloyed truth.

7.     The judiciary must protect the truthful.

8.     The actions of the judges shall not diminish the lusture of judicial portals.

9.     Judiciary, as the bulwark of freedom, must grow from strength to strength.

10.                     Though the judiciary earned the reverence of the society, the public scrutiny of all state institutions - including the judiciary - has begun witnessing marked ascendency.

11.                     There can be informed discussion for ensuring judicial accountability.

12.                     The nuts and bolts of judicial reforms must be firmed up and expeditiously acted upon.

13.                     The judiciary must make justice core and soul of this country.

14.                     There cannot be better governance without better laws.

15.                     The Government must be bound by law.

16.                     The President of India is putting her thoughts with great hopes.

The print media, as usual, blacked out the speech. There exists no official censorship. But the media mafia classifies the news into no news, all India news and local news. All India news is reserved for two or three leaders only. They are responsible for transmitting public assets to private parties.

In the presidentofindiawebsite - the Chief Justice of India was listening to the speech with rapt attention.

The Chief Justice and the other learned judges knew everything. As they do not apply them in the Supreme Court, the President of India is constrained to talk like this. No President - in the history of any country - talked like this in front of the Chief Justice.

The learned judges –as human beings- must now distinguish between the words of an ordinary citizen and the President of India. Otherwise, there will be no difference between human beings and animals.

Six officials of the private sector Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) appeared before a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) court at Chennai on 3 August 2010 in connection with a case filed by the public sector telephone company –the BSNL. The BSNL alleged that the private company had masked international calls as local calls. The present ruler would not have granted permission to this. But this must have happened with the knowledge of the present ruler or her predecessor. The Government must confiscate the assets of such companies rather than prosecuting individuals. In one or two cases, India had confiscated the assets of private individuals without waiting for final judgments.

“Rupee can become the world currency” This is one of the important articles published by The New Indian Express on 4 August 2010. In order to achieve this, the paper suggested that the Indian currency must be allowed to appreciate vis-a –vis the US dollar.

Many Indians work in foreign countries and thereby India earns foreign exchange. As the Indian currency is not allowed to depreciate consistent with its internal value, they suffer erosion in their income.

Indian exporters are equally affected by the appreciation of Indian currency.

Chinese export to India is increasing. One reason is that China allows its currency to depreciate continuously.

Any appreciation of the Indian currency would affect the tourism industry including the health sectors.

The foreign exchange reserves of India are now equivalent to its external debt only.

India is exporting raw materials at lower prices in the pretext of earning foreign exchange.

The previous NDA Government had been clearing external debts from one country after another.

The Present Government has been borrowing money from the World Bank.

About ten people take the income from the natural resources. They want to convert it into assets in other countries. Therefore, they are keeping an eye on the foreign exchange. In fact, they want to consume the entire amount during the period of the present ruler. After that, they would put the blame on the ill-conceived policy of the Government. Therefore, an alert President alone could save it.

The Union Minister for Defense said that the Union Government spent about $ 61billion for the armed forces during 2009 -2010. This is less than the amount one or two individuals get from the natural assets.

          The Government on 3 August 2010 said that the great-great grandfather of the present Prime Minister of Britain participated in a mass hanging of Indians during the 1857 revolt. This is the reply of India to the protocol followed to receive the Prime Minister of Britain.

          In this connection, it may be recalled that Cassander murdered the son of Alexander the great, realizing that the boy was coming of age. Wife of Alexander met the same fate. His sister was executed. Even the illegitimate son of Alexander, Heracles, was not spared.

But the great-great grandfather of Alexander must have many great-great grandsons identical to Alexander through many women. Theoretically, there must be, even now, several people like Alexander with the same congenital characteristics.

          Further, over 10,000 people have been killed in India in the last six years. Is not the present ruler responsible for this?

          Some newspapers now said that the ruler of India was seen in New Delhi after a gap of 15 days and attended the Parliament on 9 August 2010. They said that she had been to the USA to see her mother. Some others said that she had been in Delhi only and attributed a statement to her. Some papers said that she wanted to relinquish her position in the party in the forthcoming core committee meeting.

                    What happens in Delhi is not known to all. However, the present Prime Minister of India received 118 letters sent to the President of India. Consequently, he convened the meeting of the Union Cabinet 118 times and disappeared from the national scene equal number of times.  His repeated birth did not bring any change in his body. He does not react to day to day events of national importance. No inadvertent talking. No spur of the moment reply. No journalist approaches him to elicit any thing. While attending the Cabinet meetings, the public sector TV channel and others show other ministers only. He considers this as a great technique. Now the ruler of India is following this.

          The Government on 9 August 2010 decided to enact an Act to conceal the identity of the people exposing corruption. The motive is not a clear one. Government, apparently, wants to show that it is above corruption.

     The August 2, 2010 issue of the OUTLOOK weekly said that the ruler of India articulated a humane line to tackle the militancy in India. According to this weekly, all the rest are an embodiment of evil. This is what the $1 trillion given to the manipulators does. 

          “Where has the Prime Minister gone?” It was an article for The New Indian Express dated August 11, 2010.

          The Prime Minister disappears from the national scene obeying the dictates of the media mafia. During this incubation period, he cannot be sighted. Now they ask about his whereabouts.

          Many Members of Parliament (MPs) on 11 August 2010 condemned Sri Lanka for killing Indian fishermen straying in Sri Lankan waters. The Union Government agreed to take up this matter with Sri Lanka. However, the Government said that the security of Indians straying in Sri Lankan waters could not be guaranteed. 

          In this connection, it must be stated that India had an unrequited thirst for the blood of Sri Lankan Tamils. Exploiting this weakness, Sri Lanka killed more than 500 fishermen. That phase is over. Now, Sri Lanka must consider the fishermen as human beings. Sri Lanka shall not wage a war against India by firing at unarmed fishermen. Alternatively, India must prevent them from crossing Indian waters.

          Her Excellency the President of India on 12 August 2010 said that the Christian community in India had been contributing to nation building process, particularly to education and health care.

          The National Textile Corporation (NTC) got about $400 million through e-auctioning of about 10 acre of land in Mumbai. Indirectly justifying this, the Supreme Court, in another judgment, declared that the owner could not claim back the land acquired for public purpose.

          It must be reiterated that according to the Constitution of India, the property acquired for a public purpose shall be utilized for any other public purpose. But, it shall not be sold in any manner to private parties for private purpose. The Government is forbidden from acting as a carrier to transmit the property of one private individual to another. The maximum that the Government could do is giving them back to the original owners.

          The meaning of the 7 May 2010 judgment of the Supreme Court is that the people are the owner of public assets. The public assets are heritable to the people and not to any other individuals. The Government is only a tenant. The tenant has no right to sell them. It must hand over them to the next Government. Therefore, all public assets, including the spectrum, must be taken over forthwith. Her Excellency the President of India could discuss this with constitutional experts and arrive at a reasonable conclusion. The words of the President to establish justice shall not end in vain.

          Her Excellency the President of India on 13 August 2010 said that only an equitable society would be sustainable. She wanted the benefit of economic growth to reach every segment of society. Perhaps keeping the present ruler in mind, she said that the women have great potential to change the society.   

          The Government on 13 August 2010 granted permission to the telephone companies to import telecom equipment from China. The might of China over India could be discerned.

          Her Excellency the President of India - in the Independence Day eve address to the nation - exhorted the militant people to come to the negotiation table. The Prime Minister also said the same on the next day. The Government must take over all public assets to prove its sincerity.

          The President of India said that the growth of the nation is more important than personal promotion.

          It must be noted that the system is promoting the personal interests of two or three individuals only. The secret is money. At the same time, some people believe that this writer is seeking personal promotion.

          The present work grew to this level mainly because three successive Presidents promoted this. A common man cannot think of achieving anything more. In fact, this work drove this writer to unchartered territories.  Further, had the media not concealed this, this work would not have grown to this level.

          However, this work failed to secure to Indians sufficient space enough to drive a pin of FREEDOM! As there is no atmosphere of openness, the people are unable to estimate the worth of individuals. To this extent, the present ruler lacks the legitimacy to rule India.

          The leader of the opposition on 15 August 2010 disclosed that there was no openness in India. Curiously, a public sector TV channel telecast this. He might take it to its logical conclusion.

          It is said that the act of attaining repeated birth among the species of demoniac life is the most abominable type of existence.

          The facts from 31 July 2010 to 15 August 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 16 August 2010.

V.SABARIMUTHU

          

CHAPTER 150. The Highest Platform

150

THE HIGHEST PLATFORM

Presenting the Goenka Excellence in Journalism Award, Her Excellency the President of India on 22 July 2010 said:

1 A movement like Satyagraha could not have been possible without the help from the newspapers.

2. Issues can be trivialized, while trivial issues can be headlines.

3. Yesterday, the objective was freedom from colonial rule. Today, a nation with a leading voice in the world inspires the entire nation.

4. The media must function as a positive catalyst for change.

5. The media had highlighted the achievements of ordinary men in the past.

6. The media must profile the ability of ordinary people to overcome challenges.

7. The media must keep the national security interests in the forefront.

8. The media must play an important role in nation building.

9. The media should not be dictated by the market.

10. The media must introspect for course correction.

11. The media must be characterised by honesty, integrity and conviction.

The newspapers blacked out the speech. The present writer noticed the above points in the presidentofindia website.

Having invited the President to present the awards, The Indian Express newspaper must have published the full text of her speech. But the newspaper found it so repugnant that even its Delhi edition chose to publish the second point only. Two or three other newspapers also mentioned the same point without conveying any significant meaning.

Obviously, the above awards are being given for the best organized crime in India.

Addressing the students of a Sainik school, Her Excellency the President of India on the next day said:

1. The armed forces are the pride of the nation.

2. The education system is one that responds to the challenges of its times.

3. The teachers should make students aware of their social and cultural milieu so that they could contribute meaningfully to society.

4. The education should enable the students to work intelligently and in a systematic manner.

5. The teachers must analyse everyday experiences and make them search for solution to problems.

Ignoring the above speech of the President, a Union Minister now said that India would become a $2 trillion economy within a short time.

Nigeria on 22 July 2010 seized $2.2 million worth Chinese origin “Made in India” false medicines. This is another way of breaking the backbone of the Indian industry.

The Vice President of an Indian company was on 23 July 2010 arrested for $ 170 million. The charge was that he sold copper rods to domestic buyers at higher prices instead of selling them to foreigners at lower prices. It was, further, alleged that the company created fake documents.

In this connection, the following points may be noted:

1. The Vice President of a company cannot be solely responsible for this.

2. The above company had been charge sheeted earlier. Though the company was disqualified from bidding for Air India (AI) and Indian Airlines (IA) as in Chapter 1, nothing came out of the charge sheet.

3. As the foreigners get copper at lower prices, they are able to sell their manufactured item inside India at lower prices. This destroys Indian industry. How the Indian manufacturers bear this is not known. However, this policy is nothing but base ingratitude and treachery.

The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) on 25 July 2010 said that all decisions of the present Union Minister for Communication were being probed.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) says that it has no power to probe the corruption charges against the Union Ministers. The CVC cannot be different from the CBI.

The Government on 26 July 2010 put to death eight militant people, including a leader and a woman.

The father of the slain leader said, “I am proud of my son. He fought for our motherland. We were all scared of the atrocities of the police forces. At least he stood against them and fought”

It is not customary for the newspapers to report what the relatives of the militant people talk. However, the Deccan Chronicle reported the above statement on 28 July 2010.

Some people usurp the ores. The local people obstruct this. The beneficiaries, including the ruler, consider them as their adversaries.

A newspaper on 26 July 2010 said that the Prime Minister was following a clear sighted neo-liberal economic policy. In this way, the media mafia warned the ruler not to substitute the Prime Minister of India by any other person. In order to console the ruler, the paper said that she was ignorant of the death of militant people.

The Supreme Court on 26 July 2010 asked the army to show the rule that barred women from getting permanent commission. The court pointed out that the attitude of the army was against article 14 of the Constitution of India.

The Supreme Court could not do anything when the armed forces lighted fire as in Chapter 135. Now it is approaching them through another way. Otherwise, the Supreme Court would not have published this observation without mentioning the names of the judges. Apparently, the fundamental rights of 1000 million people - as a body - are not as important to the Supreme Court as the fundamental rights of a few individuals. Thus the Supreme Court now functions by craft rather than by law.

The military ruler of Myanmar, Senior General Than Shwe, came to India on 27 July 2010. Many agreements were signed. It is not clear whether Myanmar agreed to desist from acquiring nuclear reactors from any other country or not.

As an answer to the question of a Member of Parliament (MP), the Government on 27 July 2010 said that iron ore export would not be banned. The Government said that iron ore “fine” constituted 87 per cent of exports. It was done to prevent stock filing and environmental hazards.

The Government did not mention the name of the above MP through the print media. It does not want to show any new leader - apart from the present set of leaders- to the people.

In this connection, it must be noted that India is exporting over 110 million tonne of iron ore at the rate of $140 per tonne. The countries like China buy this and, apparently, sell iron to their domestic consumers at the rate of about $ 300 per tonne.

In India, the domestic consumers get iron at the rate of about $800 per tonne. It was as high as $1100 a few years ago.

Evidently, a cycle for the children manufactured in India costs about $ 40. China supplies an identical cycle for $15 to the consumers in India. Indian manufacturers fail to understand the trick of producing cheap cycles and break their heads. This is one of the ways followed by China –in collusion with a few manipulators- to break the backbone of the Indian industry.

Similarly, an industrialist might produce a car in India for, say, $ 6000. Another person might produce an identical car for, say, $ 4000 if he happened to be a steel producer. This is because the latter could use his steel at about 50 per cent of the market price.

The Government could have debarred the steel manufacturers from entering other manufacturing works involving steel.

Similarly, the Government could have exported iron ore at a certain price so that the steel produced by them would be costlier than the same in India.

Now Her Excellency could advise the Government to ascertain the views of all Indian manufacturers to establish justice in this matter. 99 per cent of them would demand the Government to take over all natural resources for a level playing field.

The Prime Minister of Britain, Mr. David Cameron, came to India on 28 July 2010. India had received the President of the USA consistent with Point No.8 of Chapter 45. India could have extended this protocol to the Prime Minister of Britain also.

The Government now stipulated that the importers of telephone equipment must obtain the secret code numbers citing security reasons. The hand of Her Excellency the President of India could be discerned in this.

The militant people killed five soldiers in Assam State on 30 July 2010.

A Union Minister now addressed the people of Jammu & Kashmir State as “his people” and invited them for talks.

His Royal Highness Uthradam Thirunal Marthanda Varma, on 30 July 2010 said that the Travancore kingdom had earned the unique distinction of being the only Asian military power to ever have defeated a leading European power. He added that the Dutch forces were defeated on 31 July 1741 by the people and the army. He said this after laying a wreath at the victory pillar erected by the then king Marthanda Verma at Colachel to commemorate the victory. The Indian army, for the first time, attended the war memorial service in full strength. There were reports that the army had sought permission to transfer the memorial to army control for its protection. This news was seen in the editions of newspapers circulated in the vicinity of Colachel alone. However, it is consistent with Chapter 71.

The Union Government now started selling the remaining surplus land of the public sector National Textile Corporation (NTC) through e-auction. The unconstitutional nature of this action had been mentioned in Chapter 41 and many other Chapters.

According to some newspapers, the ruler of India was not seen in Delhi in last few days and she cancelled even her scheduled meeting with the Prime Minister of Britain.

The ruler might have advised the Prime Minister of India to declare FREEDOM to Indians. The latter might have ignored this. The former might have, therefore, decided to quit politics for good. The above mentioned sale of the NTC properties might have hastened her decision. Thus she, apparently, escaped from the gigantic vices of the evil forces that surrounded her. Surely, she is rising to a higher platform.

The Supreme Court must appreciate the speeches of Her Excellency the President of India and enforce FREEDOM of expression so that the people would come to know about the existence of this work and similar works –if any – of others.

It is said that a man –instead of degrading his life- must try to elevate his life to the highest platform.

The facts from 19 July 2010 to 30 July 2010 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 31 July 2010.

V. SABARIMUTHU