456THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: PURSUE THE RIGHT AND SPEAK THE TRUTH

456

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:

PURSUE THE RIGHT AND SPEAK THE TRUTH

The Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi and the Prime Minister of Japan, Mr.Shinzo Abe, on 12 December 2015, signed 16 agreements that included bullet-trains, defense, security, infrastructure, education and civil nuclear energy.

The agreements are consistent with this work.

This is one of the most important bilateral agreements ever signed by India with any other country.

This can be considered as a small step to rescue India from China.

Japan must be commended for its conscious decision to open its doors for India. It is not clear whether the decision was inspired by the Emperor of Japan or not.

Due to this agreement,  India becomes one of the most favoured nations of Japan.

However, a reference to China, as reported by the media, could have been avoided.

The bullet-train should have connected Delhi with Mumbai, Calcutta and Chennai. One might see a tinge of private interest in the proposed Mumbai –Ahmadabad corridor.

It is the paramount duty of the government to increase the speed of all trains all over India without sacrificing  the basic parameters of safety.

India hiked the import duty on steel to 57.4 percent. The media reported this on 12 December 2015.

Simultaneously, at least 100 percent duty could have been imposed on natural rubber.

Indian rupee also could have been devalued a little.

The Bharathiya Janata Party, (BJP), accused the the leader of the Congress Party, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi and her son, Mr. Raghul Gandhi, of blackmail.  The basis for the allegation was the so called National Herald case.

          The law enforcing agencies book the leaders for their small offences.

          The biggest allegation is that the miners run the media and deny freedom of expression to remove the public resources.

          There is not even one TV channel for all the rest all over India.

          The Supreme Court of India knows this.

          This- in the past- resulted in the alienation of the public sector BALCO, IPCL and others.

          Due to this, the court suffers a kind of dishonour.

          Therefore, the court must develop an uncompromising antagonism to the political and economic blackmail.

          Further, it must take a decision to pursue the right and speak the truth.

          The present Chief Justice of India shall not hesitate to withdraw his statement regarding  the rule of law.

          This is letter No.456.

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 13-12-- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

13- 12---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

THE NEW CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA: TREACHERY?

455

THE NEW CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA:

TREACHERY?

          The Prime Minister of Japan, Mr. Shinzo Abe, arrived in Delhi, on 11 December 2015. He is expected to sign some important agreements during his three day visit.

The  auction for nine coal mines is slated for January 18-22, 2015. The newspapers reported this on 11 January 2015.

          This is out and out unconstitutional. The fundamental laws that shape the Constitution of India do not allow this.

There is no specific  law to support it either.

          The miners - directly and indirectly - run the TV channels and the newspapers. In this way, they block the flow of knowledge to the people; and remove the public resources.

          The new Chief Justice of India, setting aside all other things, should have gone into the heart of the above  allegation.

          He failed to do so.

But he proclaims that there is rule of law in India.

          These are not simply acts of corruption but an organized crime against the nation.

Now, he must show the law that permits the government to part with the public resources.

Otherwise, the people might justly accuse him of treachery.

This is letter No.455.

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 12-12-- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

12- 12---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

454: THE ARMED FORCES OF INDIA: LIBERATION OR SLAVERY?

454

THE ARMED FORCES:

LIBERATION OR SLAVERY?

The Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi, on 10 December 2015, said that there cannot be a better forum than Parliament for discussion.

The Indian Parliament never discusses any vital matters.

It did not enact any laws to alienate the public resources.

It did not discuss the method of utilization of the Provident Fund.

It did not want to  make the statue of Vallabhhai Patel  in China.

It never debates other vital matters like the freedom of expression?

The ruling class simply show certain things to the Parliament. The role played by the Members of Parliament (MPs) to determine the priorities of the land is a very limited one.

The Indian Air Force (IAF), for the first time, acknowledged the receipt of the last letter.

It was an automated reply.

Nevertheless, it is very important because the IAF might ask the Supreme Court of India to tell the law that allowed it to alienate the public resources.

The court, in turn, might ask the government to point out the law.

If the armed forces had given an action taken report to every letter, this work might have liberated the people - from this slave nation - long ago.

The armed forces now stand between liberation and slavery.

This is letter No.454.

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 11-12-- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

11- 12---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

453. THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: OPEN THE GATES OF JUSTICE

453

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA;

‘OPEN THE GATES OF JUSTICE’

Opening a door called Holy Door, Pope Francis, on 9 December 2015,  said, “ Open to me the gates of justice”.

The Union Government, on 9 December 2015, said that that the investments of the Employees Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) in the stock market are not backed by any guarantee by the government.

The Supreme Court of India induced the government to siphon off the money in this organization to other countries. Later, it indirectly, asked the government to divert the money to the stock market. Now, the court talks like this!

A court in Delhi summoned Congress leader Mr. Sonia Gandhi and her son, Mr. Rahul Gandhi, in the so-called National Herald case. Unless otherwise stayed, they must appear before the court on 19 December 2015.

According to the prosecution, they indirectly usurped the National Herald Trust.

The Acts governing the trusts and societies need drastic changes.

No member shall be allowed to hold more than certain percentage of shares, say, 0.1 per cent.

If someone wants to hold more than this, he must start his venture under the Company Act.

But, the government may not get time to debate such matters.

The Congress Party – indirectly - levelled some allegations against the Supreme Court of India in connection with the National Herald case.

It said:

1.      The court plays a dirty game.

2.      It foists false and irrelevant cases.

3.      It has different set of rules- one for the ruling party and another for the opposition.

4.      This inhibits the ability of the apposition parties to question the government.

The Supreme Court of India alone can give an answer to the charges.

The above Party, apparently, does not want to reveal the truth because these are small cases involving small amount of money.

It wants the Supreme Court to conceal this work so that the big cases would not come to the notice of the people.

Global Financial Integrity (GFI), on 9 December 2015, put the black money siphoned off from India at USD 51 billion per year.

The GFI considered this as the most damaging economic problem faced by the developing countries.

It wanted the governments to force the private companies to publicly disclose their revenues, profits, losses and other things.

Though India ranks fourth in black money outflows, everyone  must know where it is generated.

This work shows that it is generated within the four walls of the Supreme Court of India.

How is it generated?

It is generated through the denial of freedom of expression.

The income from the public resources is the main source of black money.

Just as this work remains as a dark secret within the Supreme Court, the black money remains as a dark secret within it.

The people holding black money run the TV channels and newspapers. Therefore, the people hear their views only. The court keeps this as a dark secret.

If the court is ready to enforce freedom of expression, they will hear news and views according to degree.

Then all public resources will come under the government.

Therefore, the Supreme Court of India must ‘open to the people the gates of justice’.

Will it?

This is letter No.453.

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 10-12-- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

10- 12---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

452. THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA: THE IMPLIED MEANING

452

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA:

THE IMPLIED MEANING

The Government of Tamil Nadu, on 7 December 2015, announced financial assistance to the flood victims.

As many lost their huts, they would be allotted houses in different places.

Apparently, the relief would be comparable to  that of the earthquake victims of Gujarat.

As a permanent flood control measure, the surplus waters from the reservoirs may be taken to some other regions.

The new Chief Justice of India, TS Thakur, on 6 December 2015, said, “We have a Rule of Law. My institution is capable of upholding the rights of citizen”.

Does he talk the truth? The facts do not support his claim. He should not have talked like this because the people trust him. Why should he tell a lie to them?

          The Constitution of India says that the President of India would appoint judges in consultation with the Chief Justice of India.

          The implied meaning is that a citizen would become a judge on his own right based on a well defined law.

          Assume, that the Constitution says that the President of India is free to appoint  anyone as a judge.

          Then, it is a wrong Constitution because a constitution cannot be unjust or immoral.

          The present method of selection is against law.

          This is not Rule of Law.

          Similarly, the Constitution has no specific law for the public properties.

          The implied meaning is that the court would protect the public resources.

          It proved that it is not capable of doing this.

In fact, the court, alienates them.

Further, freedom of expression is the most important fundamental right of the people.

It has dual character – the right to speak and the right to hear according to degree.

It is the implied meaning of freedom of expression.

The Supreme Court of India is the competent authority to enforce this although the High Courts can also do this.

However, the chief justice pretends that he does not know the meaning!

This work is the most important voice of the people.

It has the potential to protect the 70 mines mentioned in the last letter.

It has the potential to give freedom of expression to 1000 million people.

Until the people hear the views presented in this work, the court cannot say that it upholds the rights of citizens.

He has no income from the mines to maintain TV channels or newspapers. What can we do? The Chief Justice of India cannot talk like this.

This is letter No.452.

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 8-12-- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

8- 12---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

451. CORRUPT MONEY: BLACK PLAGUE

451

CORRUPT MONEY:

A BLACK PLAGUE

          The USA, on 3 December 2015, expressed its willingness to contribute its share to alleviate the sufferings of the flood affected people in Chennai.

          India, apparently, did not respond.

The Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi, rushed to Chennai on 3 December 2015 to undertake an aerial survey of the flood affected areas.

He had pressed into service some more helicopters before arriving in Chennai. But they were not adequate to airdrop potable water or to airlift the marooned to the relief camps.

Though the voluntary organizations do their level best to alleviate the sufferings, appropriate relief has not reached many isolated areas. The coolies are the worst affected.

He sanctioned Re.1000 crore more for the state government.

He may not have time to think over this problem.

However, he could have sanctioned a definite amount, say Re. 100,000/- ( Re. one lakh) for  every impoverished family or to every submerged house and shop.

The amount could have been disbursed to the ration cards as in Pondicherry.

It must be noted that he had asked the people to open accounts in banks.  Timely payment of money through these newly created accounts might have imparted some meaning to his call for opening accounts.

Further, everyman has a social security number called Aadhar. This also could have been used.

          The Union Government, on 3 December 2015, disclosed that 70 mines of nine mineral rich states would be auctioned in this financial year.

          The announcement coincided with the swearing in ceremony of the new Chief Justice of India.

          Did he blink at the decision of the government?

          It must be noted that some private parties inherit the mines in the pretext of licenses, leases or auctions.

          They virtually buy one country after another.

          At the same time, they claim that they give employment to the people.

          But the government could give ten times more jobs, if it is ready to exploit the minerals directly.

          The beneficiaries give tribute to many political leaders directly or indirectly.

          Many leaders deploy this wealth in the foreign countries. The Supreme Court of India connives at this.

          Some leaders spread a small portion of their fortune in India. Such assets are being selectively attached by the Directrorate of Enforcement(ED) in tandem with the CBI.

          The mines are the main source of corrupt money.

          Otherwise, how will the Supreme Court of India account for the assets of Mr. Jagan Mohan Reddy, son of former Chief Minister Mr. Rajasekhara Reddy?

          Another source for disproportionate assets is public money.

          Otherwise, how could Mr. Karthi Chithambaram own disproportionate assets as alleged by the ED?

Thus, this corrupt money affects the politics of India like a black plague.     

          Where is the law for selection of judges, properties or liberties?

          These questions are the reason for the black plague.

          It is imperative that the source for such acts of corruption must be extirpated.

          Therefore, the government must run all mines.

          If it is not feasible of compliance, the Supreme Court of India must give a chance to the people to look at this work.

This is letter No.451.

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 6-12-- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

6- 12---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

450: THE NEW CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA: TAKING DECISIONS BASED ON REASON

450

THE NEW CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA

TAKING DECISIONS GUIDED BY REASON

          The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) together with the Deparment of Income Tax (I-T) conducted joint searches on the premises of two companies of Mr.Karthi Chithambaram, son of former Union Minister Mr. P. Chithambaram on 1 December 2015.

          While Mr. Chithambaram was a minister, the ED and the IT did not see anything.

          Similarly, so long as Mr. Rajasekhara Reddy functioned as the Chief Minister of Andra Pradesh, they did not see his disproportionate assets. The moment he died, they zeroed in on his son, Mr. Jaganmohan Reddy, and attached his assets all over India.

          Therefore, the people discern a link between the official position and the disproportionate assets.

          Further, the members of the ruling class usurp the public resources and invest in other countries leaving virtually nothing for public welfare. But the ED turns a blind eye to their assets.

          This conveys the impression that the Supreme Court of India concentrates on the assets that manifests in India.

          Chennai city remains marooned for the last 15 days. A number of people have died. About 30 lakh people lack  potable water.  

4 helicopters and a ship have been deployed by the centre so far. It says that all demands of the state government would be met.

However, an alert prime minister might have pressed into service not less than one hundred helicopters and a few transport planes without waiting for a signal from the state government.

          On the eve of demitting office after 14 months, the Chief Justice of India, H.L.Dattu, on 1 December 2015, said that as a judge he answered his conscience.

          The conscience of a thief and that of a judge could be the same because the conscience does not teach what is right.

          Reason might give an alternate course of action. Actually, reason teaches a man what to do and conscience makes him to do it.

          If a thief happened to be a judge, his conscience will tell him to conceal this work.

          His conscience will tell that there is no law for freedom of expression. He would talk like this to protect the thieves.

          So, the official actions of a judge shall not be based on the conscience alone.

          But,  they must be guided by reason. A person gets the name of a judge only when he takes his decisions based on reason.

Further, he said that he would be happy if he could make a poor man to  light a lamp in his house.

Did he actually do that?

When questioned about intolerance, he said that, as the head of an institution, he should not comment on it.

He could not comment on it because he concealed 449 letters from this man alone.

On the question of filling up about 100 vacancies in various courts, he said that the new Chief Justice of India would make a call on it.

He could have promoted the judges to fill up the vacancies. He did not do so.

Instead, his conscience told him to appoint judges arbitrarily. This action went down as a murder because a learned judge – a few days prior to this- informed the people through a judgement that the present method of selection is a clannish one.

But he could not rescue reason from pride and follow the right. His conscience corrupted him; and  appointed the judges arbitrarily.

As the judges virtually rule India,  he placed the children under the rule of some individuals and not on law. This is nothing but slavery.

It is true that the Constitution of India has no laws for appointing judges.

This does not mean, the appointments could be based on the indiscretion of the Chief Justice of India.

Let the new Chief Justice of India take his official decisions based on "strong conscience and steadfast reason".

He need not take much time because he knows the status of this work.

This is letter No.450.

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 2-12-- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

2- 12---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851