CHAPTER 112

112

HEAVEN

Different chapters from this work were sent to 72 Members of Parliament (MPs) on 4 July, 2009.

The Union Budget for 2009-2010 was presented on 6 July, 2009. The Budget provided for an expenditure of Re. Ten lakh crore - about 33 percent higher than the Budget for 2008-2009.

However, the Budget was silent about the money in the Provident Fund and Pension Fund. Now this money would disappear and then reappear as Joint Ventures (JVs), Public Private Partnerships (PPPs), car loans or housing loans. If the Government had not suppressed free speech, this money would have appeared in the Budget.

The media mafia criticized the Government for resorting to borrow Re. four lakh crore to fulfill the demands of the Budget. Thus the people could not smell a rat in it.

A proposal in the Budget allowed 100 per cent tax exemption to electoral trusts. Hereafter, the corporate donation to political parties would be a legal one. Recently, a political party returned the money received from a Company.

The Budget wanted to garner about Re. 1120 crore by selling the shares of the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). But within two days, the NTPC- a PSU disclosed its intention to sell 167 crore shares for a huge amount. Some other PSUs also announced like this. It may be recalled that the NDA Government had – in good faith- taken a decision to use public money for public investments. Within two days that Government had to retract due to the muscle power of the manipulators. The present condition is reminiscent of that episode. The MPs could prevent its recurrence only by defending FREEDOM.

Above all, the Budget allotted Re. 500 crore to Sri Lanka. The Government thus wanted to give the money with the approval of the MPs so that they would support the Government in the Sri Lankan issue.

In this connection, it must be noted that the USA wanted Sri Lanka to stop the war only on seeing the Tamils standing by their leaders. But Sri Lanka connived at it. Then the European countries wanted Sri Lanka to stop the killings. Sri Lanka again ignored it. Finally, a Chief Minister in India undertook a fast to save the Tamils. But Sri Lanka finished the killings with renewed vigor.

Now, if Sri Lanka wanted steel or barbed wire either as loan or as gratis from India, the President of Sri Lanka must undertake a fast before the above Chief Minister. In fact, India shall not give even a rupee to Sri Lanka until it voluntarily comes forward to join the Indian Union.

It must be admitted that the G-8 and the G-5 countries shook hands with the Prime Minister of India on 9 July, 2009. Perhaps, they had no other go.

China now said that it wanted its blue water navy to conduct operations in distant waters. The statement of China shows that it entered Sri Lanka only to checkmate India.

Some newspapers on 13 July, 2007 said that China would attack India in 2012. It said that the Indian military was not equipped to face the two front wars by China and Pakistan. They said that India must shift out from its defeatist disposition of pacifism to deter China.

Obviously, China expects India to give money to Sri Lanka under one pretext or other so that Sri Lanka would transmit it to China. The moment India refuses to do this; China would retaliate by entering Arunachal Pradesh. It is the well tested medicine that China gives to India.

Militant people killed 44 army personnel in the Chhattisgarh State on 12 July, 2009. On the same day, the militant people killed two army personnel in the Assam State. The number of army personnel killed in internal wars has far exceeded the total number of soldiers killed in Indo-China and Indo-Pakistan wars put together. Yet the Government is not disclosing the demands of the militant people. If the Government were ready to give FREEDOM for independent politics, this situation could be averted.

The Prime Minister of India on 11 July, 2009 said that there was enormous reserve of knowledge, wisdom and experience in India and he wanted to harness them. The Prime Minister said this while suppressing all challenges to private power.

The Union Government on 12 July, 2009 decided to sell its 30 per cent holding in a private telephone company. The Union Government wants to alienate the assets of Kashmir State bit by bit. It is morally and constitutionally entitled to greater share of the wealth. However, this happens because of the thought control of the Government.

The Union Government on 12 July, 2009 decided to leave the question of auctioning the 3G spectrum to a Group of Ministers headed by the Union Finance Minister. As most of the members are hard core representatives of the manipulators, they would usurp it by circumventing the Union Cabinet. FREEDOM alone would save it.

The President of Sri Lanka on 14 July, 2009 said that it was wrong on the part of the world countries to punish all his people through sanctions and embargoes for alleged war crimes. He said that Sri Lanka was siding with the countries that helped it. He disclosed that Sri Lanka had wanted China to build a port. He added that if India had wanted to build a port or airport, Sri Lanka would have permitted it.

The above policy of Sri Lanka might have prompted India to give military training to the Tamils. This is the reason why India must either disclose the real reason for giving military training to the Tamils or bring to justice those responsible for it.

Sri Lanka on 15 July, 2009 cancelled the import of ammunition valued at $ 200 million from China and Pakistan. Anyone going through this work would tell that this is the repercussion of this work. This confirms the conclusion of the present writer that Sri Lanka had been buying weapons using Indian money. Now, Sri Lanka must dismantle its war machinery. It must abandon its plan to recruit 100,000 men for its army. It must surrender the tanks and other weapons received from India, lest it would think of using them against India. It shall maintain a police force for maintaining law and order.

Sri Lanka on 16 July, 2009 demanded India to detail Indian ex-army men for de-mining work. Indian army men have been doing this work. Now they want to substitute them with ex- army men. Indian armed forces had been under the command of Sri Lanka until the total subjugation of the Tamils. Now, the Indian army need not return to India so long as China enters Sri Lankan waters without the consent of India. Instead, Sri Lankan army must vacate the Tamil areas to avoid confrontation.

Mrs. Hillary Clinton, the US Secretary of State, on 16 July, 2009 declared that India had a tremendous opportunity and growing responsibility in Sri Lanka. She added that India had a global role rather than a regional one.

Obviously, even the USA is disturbed over the posture of China in Sri Lanka. The USA wants security to India from China. But India invited China to Sri Lanka! If India had given FREEDOM to the people to know the designs of China, the latter would not have landed in Sri Lanka at all. The Tamils also would not have died like this.

A Sri Lankan Army Commander on 16 July, 2009 said that Sri Lanka belonged to the majority Sinhalese Buddhists although the Tamils had the right to work and live. This is the condition everywhere. The big fish would swallow the small fish!

The Union Government on 18 July, 2009 submitted in the Bombay High Court that two Indian companies were “surreptitiously” appropriating national resources. The present writer has been saying this. Now the Government says this using a stronger word. Yet, it refuses to take this to its logical end. This is a blow to FREEDOM.

Pakistan on 19 July, 2009 admitted that its nationals were involved in the 26/11 attack. Pakistan might do justice in this matter. If India had not moved its warships to Sri Lankan waters, the incident would not have occurred.

The Postal Department on 20 July, 2009 returned 12 letters addressed to the MPs on 4 August, 2009. Therefore, 60 letters might have reached the MPs. Yet the Google Analytics does not show any visit to the website: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com from New Delhi. So the Government is either controlling the Google Analytics or the MPs do not browse internet. Had the people been aware of the name of this website, many calamities would not have taken place. Obviously, the people would get FREEDOM only if the Government relinquished its control over the press. The MPs must be given a lap top each is another matter.

The New Indian Express on 20 July, 2009 reported that India and China colluded to secure a $2.5 billion loan from the IMF to Sri Lanka.

It is disturbing to note that even now India is inviting China to Sri Lanka. The leaders rarely express their views to the press or to the public. The press also avoids them tactfully. They come to the Parliament without anything to talk. They sit in the front row endlessly - day after day, Parliament after Parliament. This silence is very dangerous. No democracy has seen this. This has unforeseen consequences to the nation and to individuals.

Now the FREEDOM of 1000 million people remains in the fingertip of the leaders sitting in the front row. Yet they refuse to relent. If they were not ready to give up the control over the press, they must sit in the back rows so that a new set of MPs would give FREEDOM to the people.

FREEDOM is HEAVEN. This is what the sages said.

The facts from 4 July, 2009 to 20 July, 2009 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India through email on 20 July, 2009 at 11 P.M.

V.SABARIMUTHU

CHAPTER 111

111

A STABLE MIND

Now, the media reported that China wanted to use Sri Lankan ports. A Union Minister lamented that China was fishing in troubled waters.

India allowed Sri Lanka to befriend China to secure the support of a veto power. By doing so, India compromised its own ‘National Security’. That phase is over. Now China must reckon the sensibilities of India in this matter.

The public sector Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) decided to invest Re.40, 000 crore in the stock market. The LIC is relapsing into its deviant ways due to the lack of a stable policy. The LIC is doing this to suppress free speech. The decision must be annulled as it is an unconstitutional one.

The LIC could buy shares. But it must invest the money extracted from the Kashmir State in the Companies located in that State only. If the LIC had followed this policy, the SPIC- a private sector Company in the Tamil Nadu State – and the FACT – a public sector Company in the Kerala State - would not have perished. There are two former Chief Ministers of Kashmir in the Union Cabinet. There are some other new members also. This is indeed an opportunity. When they fight for the rights of the people of their States, all others also would get their share of money.

On 18 June, 2009 militant people killed three people in the West Bengal State. They said that they had taken control over 50 villages. Immediately a war started between the army and the militant people. A number of people might have died due to this cannibalism. Yet, the Government did not disclose the grievance of the militant people.

Again on 18 June, 2009 the militant people killed 9 army personnel in the Orissa State.

Sri Lanka gave a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) to a Company of China. India first gave mines to the Tamils. Now India is helping Sri Lanka for its de-mining work. Sri Lanka intends to hand over the de-mined areas to China!

The Supreme Court on 29 June, 2009 directed the UP State Government to give the reason for the policy of spending public money –about Re. 2000 crore- for opening memorials and statues of the past and present leaders. The order came immediately after a Union Minister described the decision of the UP Government as “shame”.

In this connection, it must be noted that the Union Government had taken a decision to give Re. two lakh and fifty thousand crore to two boys. The decision was taken to control the press. This enables the leaders to reserve the front row seats in Parliament generation after generation. This helps the leaders to name the new buildings and schemes after the names of their ancestors. Similarly, the Government hands over the natural resources to private parties to control free speech.

The Union Government on 1 July, 2009 raised the price of petrol. Apparently, this is to send out two or three coalition partners from the Union Cabinet. Therefore, the decision is a political one. It must be noted that the new Union Cabinet did not give freedom to the people to buy and sell kerosene before taking the above decision.

A political leader on 1 July, 2009 said that a separate Tamil nation was not possible in Sri Lanka. He exhorted the people not to fuel the anger of Sri Lanka, lest the Tamils only would be affected. He pointed out that a leader in India had abandoned the demand for a separate nation when he had to choose between the existence of the party and realizing a separate nation. He expressed the hope that one of the Tamils would, one day, become the Prime Minister of Sri Lanka. This is, perhaps, the reply of India to this work.

It is true that India must know its weakness. But India should not fail to realize its strength also. If India wanted FREEDOM to the Tamils, they would get it. Many countries would support India. Even China would not use its veto. In the event of China defying India, the latter would be constrained to cut its relationship with the former. Therefore, Chinese naval vessels could visit the ports in Sri Lanka only with the consent of India.

China had developed friendship with Pakistan when India had no relationship with China. Now China should not think of converting Sri Lanka into another Pakistan.

India depends on China not only for machines but also for toys. Therefore, China would choose either India or Sri Lanka.

Further, FREEDOM - and not the Prime Minister ship - is the end of the State. There is no use in a slave becoming the Prime Minister of a country. India has seen Prime Ministers from North, West and South. But everyone kept the people as mere slaves.

One would say that there are many political leaders. But all are complementary to one another. There are alternatives but no rivals. The political leaders keep their rivals away from the eye of the people by controlling the press. Therefore, the people cannot even think of the rivals. Obviously, the Tamils would get FREEDOM only when the leaders in India get FREEDOM from the manipulators.

Above all, India should not procrastinate to justify the circumstances that forced it to give military training to the Tamils. One would presume that India had sufficient reasons for the same. If India could not tell the real reasons now, it should not hesitate to bring to justice the leaders responsible for the training. India should prove to the world that it did not play the game of children in Sri Lanka.

Sri Lanka on 2 July, 2009 described India and China as two tracks on a railway-line running independently. Sri Lanka must run on one line only. It must opt for either India or China. Sri Lanka could kill the Tamils because India wanted it. Now, it must realize that the FREEDOM of Sri Lanka would not be at the cost the sovereignty of India.

The media mafia on 3 July, 2009 disclosed that the Budget to be presented on 6 July, 2009 envisaged the sale of the shares of even unlisted Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs).

In this connection, it must be noted that the Government could not sell the shares of the PSUs mainly because of this work. No Government would repeat it without showing this work to the people. In this matter also, the Union Government has taken this decision to control the press. The Union Government must have a stable policy in this matter.

A member of the manipulation mafia visited the Tamils in Sri Lanka on 3 July, 2009. He described the killings as a rescue effort. When the Indian army started rescuing the Tamils,one of his his papers had described the decision of India as “loss of institutional memory”!

Notwithstanding everything, a man must possess a stable mind. Then only he would do his duty. This is what the sages say.

The facts from 18 June, 2009 to 3 July, 2009 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 4 July, 2009 through email.

V. SABARIMUTHU

CHAPTER 110

110

ACTIVATION KNOWLEDGE

Sri Lanka on 26 May, 2009 requested the world leaders to give money for the rehabilitation of the Tamils. This shows that one reason behind the killings is economic interests.
Obviously, Sri Lanka now wants to earn money through two ways. One way is seeking the help of others in the name of one half of Tamils living in Sri Lanka. Another way is trapping the foreign exchange remittances of the other half living in other countries.
THE NEW INDIAN EXPRESS on 27 May, 2009 disclosed that a law had been passed to block the emails and blogs of individuals that convey anything about the Government. It is clear that this work remains hidden not only due to the media mafia but also due to the control of the Government over the press. It must be noted that the paper revealed this only after this writer pointed out this.
A political party in India on 29 May, 2009 returned Re.27,64.925/- received from a big industrial house. Others also could emulate this.
The President of Sri Lanka on 30 May, 2009 said that there was no pressure from India even during the final assault to stop the war. He said that India did not ask Sri Lanka to stop the war at any stage because Sri Lanka was carrying out the war of India. He added that the soil of Sri Lanka would not be used by any another country for anti - India activities.
Thus, India –and not Sri Lanka- is responsible for the killings. Sri Lanka was only an instrument in the hand of India. As India did not rebut his statement, it is clear that India did not ask Sri Lanka to stop the war even when the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu State undertook the fast.
Further, the statement gives the impression that Sri Lanka gave a naval base to China only at the instance of India. Therefore, India must clarify whether Sri Lanka gave the construction work of a base to China after getting the consent of India or not.
A special session of the United Nations Human Rights Commission was convened on 28 May, 2009. The resolution sought to try those found guilty of the crimes against humanity during the Sri Lankan war. There was no consensus in favour or against. 12 nations, including England, France, Germany and Italy, voted for the resolution. 29 Nations, including India, passed a Sri Lankan counter resolution that praised the killings. Thus it approved the racial policy of Sri Lanka and the extermination of the Tamils.
Russia supported Sri Lanka. But Georgian intervention of Russia and its other internal policies might prompt it to support the Tamils in the long run.
Cuba tried to block the discussion. If the USA had given Indian type military training to the boys in Cuba, it would not have done so.
However, as the European countries are even now central to the mind of the world, Sri Lanka was defeated in the eye of the right thinking countries. Whether they were activated by one or two letters from the present writer or not is known to them only.
In this connection, it must be stated that the body of a leader of an important nation had been hung upside down for public viewing for committing a far smaller crime.
The copies of the last email were sent by post to 20 Ministers in the Union Cabinet, President of India, Speaker, Chief Justice of India and the Chief Justice of Madras High Court on 1 June, 2009.
The President of India, in her address to the joint session of Parliament on 4 June, 2009, informed the decision of the Government to sell 49 per cent of the shares of all PSUs. She also said that India would make contribution to rehabilitate the Tamils in Sri Lanka.
The letters sent on 1 June, 2009 might have reached the hands of the Union Ministers on 5 June, 2009. Whatever happened, the Union Cabinet postponed the proposed visit of the President of Sri Lanka to India. As there was no consensus, it, apparently, decided not to transfer Re. 500 crore to Sri Lanka. The talks about 49 per cent privatization of the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) practically disappeared. The talks about the sale of loss making PSUs also faded. Some Cabinet Ministers might have wanted the nationalization of all natural resources. A Union Minister said that the new Budget would be formulated consistent with the views of the public only. Thus a two page letter activated some new Ministers. In fact, anyone could discern their thirst for the good. But none disclosed the existence of this work as if they were under an oath to deny FREEDOM to Indians.
India, apparently, transmitted the new developments to Sri Lanka immediately. Sri Lanka, in turn, sent a Minister and some Tamil representatives to assuage the feelings of the leaders. During this occasion, one or two leaders might have demanded to give freedom to the Tamils to get aid from India. But nothing came to the open.
The President of the USA on 6 June, 2009 said that the other nations must stop genocide when it occurs. The President did not say anything about India. However, his words show that the USA had expected India to stop the killings.
Sri Lanka on 6 June, 2009 sent back a Mercy Mission ship containing medicine donated by the Tamils in Europe. Obviously, India need not donate even medicine to Sri Lanka.
The Prime Minister of India on 8 June, 2009 reiterated in Parliament that those who wanted power must come through the ballot box. However, he agreed that a new idea could not be stopped. He said that the militant people who obstruct the removal of minerals would be defeated. With regard to Sri Lanka, he declared that Re. 500 crore had been allotted for the rehabilitation work.
The Government is exercising an absolute power over the press. The Election Commission and the Supreme Court do not ask the Government to tell the reason for this. The political leaders are also helpless. Therefore, the ballot box is useless and no rival can emerge in India.
The ECONOMIC TIMES on 8 June, 2009 said that China aided the Sri Lankan bloodbath. The paper is shifting the blame to China. China did not refute this. Thus some accuse Sri Lanka. Some doubt India. Now China is also appearing. Therefore, the world would never fix the responsibility for the killings under the present conditions.
However, as no other country helped the Tamils, India should now justify the military training given to the Tamil boys.
Sri Lanka arrested 9 Indian fishermen on 9 June, 2009. There was no reaction from India.
A Union Minister on 13 June, 2009 said that India would use its authority to ensure equal rights for Tamils in Sri Lanka.
The statement shows that the Government would give money to Sri Lanka under one pretext or other. This would embarrass many political parties because they would find it very difficult to quit the Government on this issue.
If India could achieve independence to the Tamils, they would do various works. They would earn foreign exchange by trading with Sri Lanka and other nations. None need help them. In contrast, so long as Sri Lanka receives money or any help from India, they would keep the Tamils in sheds and debauch them in all possible ways. They would transfer the foreign exchange and their internal resources to China for buying weapons or for repaying loan. This is how China accumulates foreign exchange at the expense of India is another matter.
A Sri Lankan navy vessel collided with two Indian fishing boats on 15 June, 2009. Five fishermen escaped in another boat. Sri Lanka is doing this because it got money, weapons and logistic support from India. Curiously, India did not condemn the incident.
The militant people killed four army personnel on 16 June, 2009 in the Jharkhand State. The army retaliated by killing four militants. In the Assam State, the militant people killed twelve people including eight children. None condemned these incidents.
The President of the USA on 16 June, 2009 requested the world countries to ensure freedom of expression to the people. Does he mean India? India must give an answer.
Notwithstanding anything, the activation knowledge –the minimum knowledge required to activate a man- must be low. Then only a man would do his duty. This is what the sages say.
The facts from 26 May, 2009 to 17 June, 2009 are being sent to Her Excellency the President of India on 17 June, 2009 through email. It was immediately put on the website: www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com
V.SABARIMUTHU

Chapter 109

109

 

A STAND

 

 

                The Supreme Court on 4 May, 2009 expressed its dissatisfaction over the stand taken by the Union Government for the recovery of the money in the numbered accounts. In contrast to the BALCO judgment, the learned judges said that the court was watching the economic policy of the Union Government. The new stand of the court shocked the Government. Now the Chief Justice of India should not leave it in a half-baked condition.

                The Prime Minister of India requested the people to keep him in power for 100 more days to bring about a great economic change in India.

                On 6 May, 2009 the militant people killed 10 police personnel in the Chhattisgarh State.

                A leader of a religious organization in India attributed the war in Sri Lanka to religious factors.

                On 11 May, 2009 militant people killed 11 police personnel in the Chhattisgarh State.  On the same day, the militant people killed 3 polling officers in the West Bengal State.

                Russia on 11 May, 2009 joined China and blocked a United Nations Security Council resolution on the problem of Tamils.

                China had opposed a resolution earlier presumably because India is one of its valuable markets.  Now Russia also is taking the same stand. In this connection, it must be noted that Russia - under a genius- did not choose a path of self annihilation but agreed to a spontaneous disintegration of the Union of Soviet Socialistic Republic (USSR) into several countries.  Now, Russia is not prescribing the same medicine to Sri Lanka!

                An envoy of the USA called on the leader of the principal opposition party on 13 May, 2009.

                In the Indian General Election, the ruling United Progressive Alliance (UPA) improved its numerical strength in the Parliament. It secured 262 seats in the 544 member House. However, even before the results were declared almost all opposition parties announced their support to the principal ruling party.

                As the media mafias conceal this work, the people do not know that they have no right to sell even kerosene. They do not know that their Government had taken a decision to give Re. two lakh and fifty thousand crore to two boys. When someone says that the people have no FREEDOM to know news and views they look at him scornfully. Naturally, they say that one family alone is qualified to rule India. Thus the media mafias confirm their ability to make any imbecile the ruler of India. For the same reason, the present election is constitutionally null and void.

                If the system had given FREEDOM to the people to know the message of this work, they would have demanded the political parties to nationalize the minerals and the spectrum to prevent their perennial inheritance.  They would have demanded them to take action for the letter dated 1-6-2001. Above all, they would have demanded them to restore the illegally privatized Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs).

                The President of Sri Lanka on 16 May, 2009 said that he secured freedom to Sri Lanka by defeating the Tamils. The truth is that Sri Lanka conquered the entire Tamils areas.

                Militant people killed 4 people in the Assam State on 19 May, 2009.  On the same day, army killed 6 militant people in the same State.

                India decided to give Re.500 crore to Sri Lanka for the resettlement of the Tamils. An enquiry would prove that India gave a huge amount of money to Sri Lanka secretly. Now Sri Lanka must be asked to utilize its own internal resources for the rehabilitation work. When other countries take up the rehabilitation work, Sri Lanka utilizes its money for buying weapons. This is the reason why many other countries have stopped giving money to Sri Lanka. The hard earned money of Indians is now going to Sri Lanka for killing the Tamils.

                The President of Sri Lanka on 19 May, 2009 said that he succeeded in killing all top leaders of the Tamils not because of his will but because of the will of the international community.

                It is true, that Sri Lanka could kill the Tamils because of the unconscious will of the world.  This happened because one or two countries misled the world through the aid of the media mafia. Even otherwise, SCHOPENHAUER says that the lowest forms of life are entirely made up of will, without knowledge. As man in general is mostly will and little knowledge, he says that the man must be freed from will so that his intellect can see the object as it is.

                A leader in Sri Lanka on 20 May 2009 expressed his desire to meet a Congress party leader of India and her daughter. Again, according to SCHOPENHAUER, even with talented women everything is personal, and is viewed as a means to personal ends.

                The correctness or otherwise of the inference of SCHOPENHAUER is known to women only. However, the people did not give much importance to his words. Now many people tell that Sri Lanka could kill the Tamils because one or two leaders in India subjugated their intellect to their will. Naturally, every minister in Sri Lanka wants to meet them.

                India sent medicine worth Re.3 crore besides a medical team to Sri Lanka on 21 May, 2009. In this way India induces Sri Lanka to kill more and more Tamils.  Other countries are not sending medicine like this. They abhor giving medicine and poison simultaneously. Even otherwise, no country shall seek or accept any help from others after blinding its children.

                The militant people killed 16 police personnel in the Maharashtra State on 21 May, 2009.  None in India condemned it. In these crucial matters the Prime Minister remains invisible. The militancy is spreading even to the Maharastra State. Even after repeated requests, the Government of India is not giving the reason why Indians kill Indians like this. Weapons fail to elicit a reply. Words also go in vain.

                The new Union Government  was sworn in on 22 May 2009. The Prime Minister got one more term. The President of the USA sent a congratulatory message to the Prime Minister only after the new Minister for External Affairs said that India valued greatly its relationship with the USA. The Prime Minister of Britain also has not greeted the Prime Minister. Do they perceive that those who possess power in India deceive the people to remain in power? Is the present leadership a liability to the nation? This must be a source of discomfort. Ironically,  the leaders have great satisfaction.

                The UN Secretary General on 24 May, 2009 shook hands with the President of Sri Lanka! In this way he approved the extermination of Tamils.

                Notwithstanding anything a man must have an instinct to take a firm stand in crucial matters. Then only he would be able to do his duty. This is what the sages say.

                The facts from 2 May, 2009 to 25 May,2009 are being sent to Her Excellency the President of India on 26 May 2009.

 

V.SABARIMUTHU

               

               

 

CHAPTER 108

108

DESTRUCTION

      The USA on 19 April, 2009 asked Sri Lanka to stop the war and start negotiation. The USA, for the first time, warned of dire consequences. The Tamils immediately welcomed the new stand of the USA.
     Accepting a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), the Supreme Court on 20 April, 2009 directed the Union Government to submit an affidavit - within 48 hours – on the money in the numbered accounts. A newspaper in Switzerland had reported that a former Prime Minister of India had deposited Re.11000 crore!
     The Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu State on 23 April, 2009 said that the Tamils got military training during the period of two successive Prime Ministers because their demand for a sovereign nation was a reasonable one. However, all other leaders in India have been telling that India did it in the supreme national interest.
      India gave military training to the Tamils at a time when India donated an island to Sri Lanka. No country would part with its island while giving military training like this. Hence, the statement of the Chief Minister is an untenable one. Now, the Chief Minister is virtually a ruler of India. He could consider the question of disclosing the real reason behind the act of giving military training to the boys.
      The Chief of an Information Technology Company on 23 April, 2009 said that the dismissed employees would get full pay for one year if they did not get re-employment. This is his reply to the last email submitted to Her Excellency the President of India. He knew that it is nothing but an act of injustice. But he also knew what he says is law. Now the employees would look upon him with fear and suspicion instead with love, respect and gratitude.
      Militant people killed five police personnel in the Bihar State on 24 April, 2009.
      Two Indian officials called on the President of Sri Lanka on 25 April, 2009. Sri Lanka immediately intensified the war.
       The USA on 25 April, 2009 again asked Sri Lanka to halt the hostilities. The USA now said that any military end to the conflict would end the hope for the unification of Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka asked the USA and the western countries to mind their own business. It said that no power had the right to bail out terrorism.
      A political party in India on 25 April, 2009 considered the creation of an independent Tamil nation as the solution to the Sri Lankan crisis. African National Congress party in Africa expressed a similar opinion.
      The President of India on 26 April, 2009 visited the Auschwitz concentration camp in Poland. She saw the ‘gas chamber’ where about 1.1 million Jews had been exterminated. The President described the killing as an example of “human misery and cruelty”. She expressed her hope that such incidents would never happen again.
      When the present writer profusely quoted Plato, the former President of India paid a visit to Greece. Now, on seeing the repetition of the Holocaust in Sri Lanka, the President of India went to see the ‘gas chamber’. In this way, the President unequivocally demanded her Government to put an end to the misery and cruelty in Sri Lanka. In fact, the act of wounding parents and their children by bombing and keeping them without any treatment inside barbed fences is more heinous than vaporizing them in a ‘gas chamber’.
      The Tamils, on 26 April, 2009, declared cessation of offensive operations. Describing this as a joke, Sri Lanka rejected it. It asked the rebels to either surrender or perish in the deep sea. It thanked India for extending all kinds of logistic, weaponry and monetary supports. Offended by this development, the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu State commenced an indefinite fast on 27 April, 2009 at 6 A.M. India immediately asked Sri Lanka not to use aircraft or heavy weapons. At 1 P.M. the latter obliged.
      The above fast diffused a highly volatile situation in Sri Lanka. A sudden thoughtless action might have resulted in the death of more than 10,000 people on that day.
The Encyclopedia Britannica had mentioned the name of this Chief Minister long ago. Therefore, he needs no new achievement to establish his name. However, if his Government at the centre had been helping Sri Lanka without his knowledge, the fast might go down as an achievement. It would be an addition to his greatness.
      The fast shows that three or four leaders possessing power in India join together in a small room and frame the policies of the land in bad faith. No consent of the Parliament. No common consent. No Cabinet meeting. No collective responsibility. No debate in any forum. The Union Ministers are expected to present to the Cabinet the matters pertaining to their ministries only. This is the etiquette. This is the reason why a coalition partner had to undertake a fast.
      It is true that Sri Lanka –exercising the greatest cunning and caution – enlisted the support of the USA and other countries before the present military action. Yet, the USA might have moved its warships to Indian Ocean. It might have informed its intention to undertake a 30 minute air operation to destroy the war machinery of Sri Lanka. Alternatively, the some European countries might have conveyed their intention to grant independence to the Tamils. The fast might have coincided with these developments. If these inferences were true, it was India that surrendered the heavy weapons, for a moment, to the will of the world.
      The shocked media mafia warned that any withdrawal of the Sri Lankan forces from the Tamil areas would lead to the destruction of India.
     Now, if the Tamils were responsible for perpetrating injustice in Sri Lanka, they are liable for total destruction. If Sri Lanka were doing injustice, the world should not hesitate to destroy its war machinery. If India were responsible, the bad thinking that brought down a calamity in Sri Lanka deserves destruction.
      The Madras High Court on 27 April, 2009 sentenced a former Managing Director of a nationalized bank to a 14 year imprisonment.
      Sri Lankan Air Force on 28 April, 2009 bombed and killed several Tamils in the hope of destroying the prize within. Thus it violated its own announcement. If the Tamils had aircraft, they would have destroyed the Sri Lankan air bases. If they had heavy weapons, they would have retaliated. Now, they are physically powerless. They have no strength even to protest. Yet Sri Lanka is undertaking bombing operations!
      The manipulation mafia on 28 April, 2009 said that about one lakh Information Technology employees would be dismissed before September, 2009 based on a stringent performance criterion.
      In this connection, it must be stated that a Company now wants to hire 20,000 and fire 2000. Anyone could be beaten below the belt using the performance criterion. It is a new predicament. They interfere in examinations and award low mark in interviews. They trap telephone conversations and block emails. Above all, they have the power “to strange” the work like this one. Now they want to dismiss employees! The President, Government and the Supreme Court must be sensitive to find a solution.
      The Foreign Ministers of Britain and France visited Sri Lanka on 29 April, 2009. Sri Lanka turned down their demand for a truce presumably because it believed that it was sitting on the head of India.
      The President of Sri Lanka on 30 April, 2009 said that the USA should not preach to Sri Lanka. Now he would find fault with anyone acting in good faith. Apparently, he thinks that he alone has a brain that needs no preaching.
      Not withstanding anything a man might perpetrate injustice. He may be an incarnation of a divine power. Even then he is liable for destruction. This is what the sages say.
      The facts from 19 April, 2009 to 1 May, 2009 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 2 May, 2009 through email.

V.SABARIMUTHU

CHAPTER 107

107

GREATNESS

One more man in India immolated himself on 22 March, 2009. 12 people have died in a similar way for the Tamils.

In the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), China opposed a discussion on the human rights problem of the Tamils in Sri Lanka. China alone requested the UNSC not to interfere in the internal affairs of Sri Lanka. China justified its stand saying that the military operation in Sri Lanka had no effect on international security and peace.

It is true that “sometimes it is better to leave things as they are”. However, when some countries gave military training to the Tamils, China did not describe that as an act of interference in the internal affairs of another country. In contrast, China has been shaking hands with all leaders associated with that training.
Further, the terrors in Sri Lanka are disturbing the mind of all right thinking people all over the world although Norway alone came out of its comforts and did its duty to find a solution.
Incidentally, the present writer has been sending the copies of the last few emails to many western countries mainly because the ball is in their court. As the copies were not sent to China, it opposed the motion. This conclusion is an imagination only. What the present writer knows is his work and the present developments.
Eight militant people and eight army personnel died in different clashes in the Jammu & Kashmir State during the last three days.
The Speaker of Parliament on 23 March, 2009 described the process of disqualification as a matter of arbitration. This is the answer to the charges leveled against him.
At the instance of the President of the USA, the Prime Minister of India agreed to a one-on-one meeting on 2 April, 2009 during his visit to London for the G-20 Summit.
The officials from the Embassy of Germany and Sweden on 25 March, 2009 called on a political leader in the Tamil Nadu State to know more about the problem of Tamils in Sri Lanka.
The Indian Cricket on 25 March, 2009 signed a Re.8200 crore Official Broadcast Partner Agreement till 2017. The proceeds must be kept under a competent authority appointed by the Government.
Employees Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) on 26 March, 2009 rejected the demand of the Government to park 15 per cent of its corpus totaling around Re.1,82,000 crore in the Stock Market.
The veracity of the above report is not known to anyone. Assuming that the amount indicated is a correct one, the EPFO is in possession of Re. 12,00,000 crore (Re. twelve lakh crore)! In contrast, the Union budget for 2008-2009 was Re.7,50,000 crore!
In this connection, it must be noted that the EPFO and the Union Government are not separate entities. Yet, the EPFO has rejected the proposal of the Government. This shows that the President of India might have persuaded the Government not to invest the money in the stock market arbitrarily. Now, the President must take one more step so that the Government would disclose the method of utilization of the EPFO money.
The USA on 26 March, 2009 requested Sri Lanka to bring an end to the war and find a solution acceptable to all sections of the people. Sri Lanka ignored the demand. The USA chose not to react immediately.
The trial of a 66 year old man connected with the former “Khmer Rouge” rulers of Cambodia opened at a genocide tribunal on 30 March, 2009.
Mr. Alberto Fugimori, a former President of Peru, claimed innocence before a tribunal. The charge was that he killed 50 people in three different incidents.
In this connection, it must be noted that all rulers kill their opponents branding them as rebels or antisocial elements. So long as they enjoy the support of the media, the world accepts them as efficient leaders. When they fall from the grace of the media, they and their supporters face the charges of genocide.
A Congress party leader in India on 31 March, 2009 requested the President of Sri Lanka to declare cease-fire. The latter ignored it. The former left the matter there.
The US Secretary of State on 1 April, 2009 said that the international community had started planning for the post conflict period in Sri Lanka. There was no reaction from Sri Lanka for this.
Many considered the new stand of the USA as a clear signal to grant total freedom to the Tamils. However, Tamils, presumably because of their untold sufferings, believed that all half-hearted steps by other countries would perpetrate injustice only.
Above apprehension is an unfounded one. This conclusion is based on the fact that the moves of the USA and other western countries are upsetting all calculations of Sri Lanka.
The Prime Minister of India met the President of the USA at London after the G-20 Summit. The President, among other things, might have discussed the Sri Lankan terror.
The Prime Minister of India called on the Queen of England on 2 April, 2009. The Queen might have requested him to give FREEDOM not only to Indians but also to the Tamils.
An explosion killed a man in Assam State.
Some Malayalam TV channels disclosed that India paid Re.900 crore in 2008 as commission for buying missiles worth Re.10,000 crore from Israel. The other TV channels and newspapers did not report this with any seriousness. The Government has not rejected the report.
Eight people died in four separate explosions in the Assam State on 6 April, 2009.
Some Tamil newspapers in India on 7 April, 2009 said that 520 Tamils including many civilians died in an attack using chemical weapons. The papers said that the chemical weapons had been supplied to Sri Lanka by India. Sri Lanka denied the use of chemical weapons. However, the photograph of the dead bodies – all without any bullet wounds- supported the claim of the Tamil newspapers.
Her Excellency the President of India sent a reply to a letter on 18 March, 2009. The letter is given below.
PRESIDENT’S SECRETARIAT
(PUBLIC SECTION)
RASTRAPATI BHAVAN NEW DELHI-110004
Serial Number:P1-A/4881 Dated 18-March-2009
Enclosed please find for appropriate attention a petition dated 10/03/2009 received from SHRI V.SABARIMUTHU, THATTANKONAM, VELLICODE, P.O. 629167, MULAGUMOODU, Tamil Nadu
Action taken in this matter may please be communicated to the petitioner, directly under intimation to this Secretariat.
(K.C. Jayarajan)
Addl. Comptroller
To,
SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, SOUTH BLOCK
Copy to
SHRI V.SABARIMUTHU,THATTANKONAM, VELLICODE, MULAGUMOODU P.O.629167, Tamil Nadu
Requested to liaise with the aforementioned addressee directly for further information in
the matter.
(K.C. Jayarajan)
Addl.Comptroller
In this connection, it must be stated that it is the first letter received from the President of India for 105 letters or petitions. This may be a small step for the President of India. But, it is a giant step for 1000 million people. This might put the President at odds with the convention. However, the reply shows that the President is transmitting the petitions not only to the Prime Minister of India but also to various ministries, investigation offices and the Supreme Court. Thus, even the Chief Justice of India would be constrained to give a reply to the questions pertaining to the administration of justice in India. This shows that the office of the President of India is not the end of the career of a person. The obvious inference is that the President might give FREEDOM to Indians.
The USA and France on 9 April, 2009 requested Sri Lanka and the Tamils to stop war –like activities. Canada also followed suit. Sri Lanka, as usual, ignored it.
The Union Government on 9 April, 2009 decided to hand over 70 oil fields - before the general election - to private parties through an auction.
The act of apportioning the natural resources of the country among less than ten individuals is an unconstitutional one. Further, the Government shall not do anything to add to the militancy in India. This would undermine the UNITY of India. The violence taking place in India proves this. The Supreme Court would agree with this.
Further, there is no dearth of funds. The money in the Provident Fund and Pension Fund remains unutilized.
In the meantime, an Information Technology Company in India decided to dismiss over 2000 employees attributing inefficiency. This company recruited the boys after conducting rigorous tests. Now it wants to dismiss them. One reason is their family background. In order to dismiss one or two, it is dismissing over 2000! No escape. The Company is not bound by anything. Such a situation does not exist in any other country.
The militant people killed two police officers in Assam State on 11 April, 2009.
On the same day, the militant people killed 10 police personnel in the Jharkhand State. The encounter occurred just hours before a Congress party leader addressed a meeting. One or two newspapers reported the incidents in remote corners. The political leaders did not condemn the killings.
In this connection, it must be noted that the Government is not disclosing the reason why Indians kill Indians. The reason why they target the top leaders is also not known to the people.
Four people, including two police personnel, died in a land mine explosion in the Chhattisgarh State on 12 April, 2009. Police gunned down six militant people in two other encounters in the same State on the same day.
40 people, including 10 army personnel, died in a gun battle in the Chhattisgarh State on 13 April, 2009.
10 army personnel and four militant people died in another gun battle near a bauxite mine in the Orissa State on 13 April, 2009.
The President of India on 14 April, 2009 presented civil awards to 63 personalities. A representative of a manipulator took for himself one award. None in India questioned the correctness or otherwise of this.
Sri Lanka killed 18000 rebels in the last few weeks. Sri Lanka proudly said this on 14 April, 2009. This is worse than dropping an atom bomb on the Tamils. The mass graves of children, women and families would require a tribunal. This would happen only if the world countries were ready to withdraw their support to Sri Lanka.
The Government sold Satyam Company to another Indian Company on 16 April, 2009. The sale is patently unconstitutional.
The militant people killed 19 police personnel and polling officers, in the first phase of polling on 16 April, 2009 in four States. None in India condemned it. It went down as a routine incident. Why do Indians wage a war against Indians? Is it because of the denial of FREEDOM in India? Or is it because of the perception that the Government functions as an agent to transmit the natural resources to private parties perennially? It is the duty of the President to give answers to these unanswered questions.
England and France again asked Sri Lanka to stop the war. They, apparently, do not want to perpetrate injustice any more.
Presumably at the instance of the many western countries, India talked to the representatives of the Tamils and the Sri Lankan Government on 16 April, 2009 at New Delhi. This shows that Sri Lanka is not a sovereign nation. The moment the world wants, the Tamils would get freedom.
In this connection, when the present writer wanted India to save the Indian fishermen, two Indian officials went to Sri Lanka and, apparently, directed it to destroy the Tamils at the earliest. None denied this. They are destined to suffer and die like this for reasons not known to them. This has no precedent.
A political leader in India on 18 April, 2009 said that her party would work for a free Tamil Nation in Sri Lanka.
The UN Secretary General, Mr. Ban Kimoon, sent the chief of staff of the UN, Mr. Vijay Nambiar, to Sri Lanka to assess the situation. Mr. Nambiar on 18 April, 2009 wanted Sri Lanka to stop the war. However, Sri Lanka expressed its helplessness saying that issue was in the hands of its field commanders.
The world could have prevented the perpetuation of injustice in Sri Lanka in several ways. If nothing worked, the world countries could have established diplomatic relationship with the Tamils after granting independence. Now, the only license in the hands of Sri Lankan leaders is that the Tamils belong to their country.
The Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs, has not given a reply to the letter dated 18-3- 2009 of the President of India.
A man may be so great that no achievement would be an addition to his greatness. Even then he must do his duty. This is what the sages say.
The facts from 21 March, 2009 to 18 April, 2009 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India through email on 19 April, 2009.

V.SABARIMUTHU

Chapter 106

106

KNOWLEDGE IS LIBERATION

      The last email was sent to Her Excellency the President of India on 23 February, 2009. The website: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com was immediately updated. Besides, the copies were sent to several responsible people including the members of the Election Commission of India, Chief Justice of India and the Chief Information Commissioner. None brought it to the knowledge of the people. 

      The USA on 25 February, 2009 requested Sri Lanka to stop the war and start negotiation with the rebels. But Sri Lanka immediately turned down the suggestion saying that the war was against terrorism that was in the last stage.

      With regard to its financial crisis, the USA said that a part of the bail out package would go to the small business and not a penny would go to the Wall Street. This is consistent with the suggestion that the public money must go to the smallest and the weakest companies.

      The Government of India now ordered the inspection of the books of account of 150 companies, including 14 listed companies.

      A political leader in India on 24 February, 2009 requested the Union Government to lift the ban on the rebels in Sri Lanka.

      One more man on 25 February, 2009 committed self immolation for the cause of the Tamils. He later died. This shows that the world leaders must be full of compassion towards all human beings irrespective of their nationality.

     A Special Court on 25 February, 2009 sentenced a former Union Minister to three year imprisonment for corruption.

      The 14th Parliament ended on 27 March, 2009. The Speaker did not dispose the disqualification petitions pending before him. Hereafter, the system would try to choose the people like him only as the President of India.

      The Company Law Board (CLB) on 5 February, 2009 allowed majority representation to the Government in the Maytas Infra Board. Maytas Infra is a company of the son of Mr. Raju, the owner of Satyam.

      The Parliamentary Standing Committee for Law and Justice said that the judges of the High Courts must be selected by a competent committee rather than by four or five judges of the Supreme Court. The learned judges of the Supreme Court need not assume to themselves the power to appoint judges. It is an unnecessary burden. The present Chief Justice of India could do great service in this matter before his retirement.

      Now a Union Minister said that fundamental questions on capitalistic system had come up. Further, he said that India would see huge public investments and not private investments in the next three years. He added that his Government had to take into account the wishes of the people. The reason why the Union Minister talks of three years is not known to the people. Does he mean the tenure of the present President of India?

      India on 9 March, 2009 sent a 52-member medical team to Sri Lanka to treat the victims of war.

      The principal opposition party in the Tamil Nadu State on 9 March, 2009 demanded the independence to the Tamil region in Sri Lanka. The party, however, did not favour armed struggle to achieve it.

      On the next day, one more political party considered independence to the Tamils as a remedy to the killings. Many other parties also might have expressed similar opinions. But the media blacked out their words.

      In this connection, it must be noted that the present writer had sent the copy of the last email to one or two members of all political parties in the Tamil Nadu State Assembly.

      An envoy of India met the US Secretary of State, Mrs. Hillary Clinton, on 10 March, 2009.   The USA might have discussed the Sri Lankan crisis. 

      Sri Lanka said that India had been helping that country by giving medicine, food and money but others were giving unwanted advice. The New Indian Express reported this on 12 March, 2009. This shows that some countries are demanding Sri Lanka to consider the question of giving freedom to the Tamils although no country has said anything openly. The Tamils failed to declare independence is a different matter.

      On 12 March, 2009 the Union Government submitted before the Madras High Court that there was nothing wrong in apportioning the spectrum for Broadband Wireless Access among four private operators.

      It is the duty of the Union Government to apportion the spectrum among the State Governments. It is for the UNITY present in the Constitution of India. Now the King of Travancore has no right to run a telephone company. His subjects also do not enjoy any right over this natural resource. They have no right to buy and sell even petrol. The act of divesting the business interests of the people of a region under any pretext is unconstitutional. The President could seek the opinion of the Supreme Court in this matter.

      The Government appointed a former Chief Justice of India to guide the sale of Satyam Company. Immediately, he converted the proposed online sale into offline sale. The message is obvious.

     In this connection, it must be noted that Mr. Raju is more a seeker of wealth than a big anti-constitutional manipulator. The former must be supported but the latter must be extirpated.       The Government shall take over his ill-gotten wealth. But, he has not transmitted his power to the Government to affect the sale. Therefore, the sale would go down as an unconstitutional action. The President could seek the opinion of the Supreme Court in this matter also.

In the meantime, the Union Government decided to sell some vacant properties in the cities for the construction of hospitals and old age homes. One would think that this decision is consistent with this work. But this decision too is an unconstitutional one. The land acquired for public purposes shall not be sold to private parties under any pretext. Unwanted properties must be returned to the original owners.

     Now a political leader has been arrested under the National Security Act. An actor also has been arrested. The allegation is that they talked something in the context of the problem of Tamils in Sri Lanka. Now they must remain in jail like animals for one year without any bail. The news medium had blacked out their speeches. Therefore, what they talked is not known to the people. The present action of the Government alone is known to the people.

      In this connection, it must be noted that India had asked the boys in Sri Lanka to take gun against their Government. India asked them to consider this as their duty to their kith and kin. Emboldened by the action of the Union Government, a State Government openly gave huge amount of money to the boys. All right thinking people would agree that the present developments are the effects of the decision of the Union Government. The Government did it with the knowledge of the then Union Ministers. Some of them are still in the Union Government. Therefore, the system must ask all senior Union Ministers to prove their innocence before affecting the arrests of such people. This is a very important one because knowledge and action consistent with that knowledge might lead to the liberation of the people.

     On 14 March, 2009 army killed three militant people in Jammu and Kashmir State.

On 15 March, 2009 the US Secretary of State again demanded Sri Lanka to stop the war. Within no time, Sri Lanka rejected the demand as an insignificant one.

     When the new President of the USA asked Sri Lanka to stop the war against the rebels, many people believed that the USA and the western countries would intervene in one way or other to stop the killings. It is possible for them. In fact, the Sri Lanka would not hesitate to withdraw the army from the Tamil region. Now, the USA is losing control over even this small country. This will have some bad consequences to the world.

      The USA must fight against injustice in this region. Otherwise, the future of the Tamils would be controlled by fate only. In fact, Sri Lanka intensified the war against the Tamils only when the present writer wanted India to stop the killings of Indian fishermen. Obviously, they are being affected by what others do. It might have been a coincidence is a different matter.

      In this connection, any one could discern that Russia does not allow cannibalism for such a long period of time in the areas of its influence.

      Two more men committed self immolation on 15 March, 2009. They, perhaps, believed that the destiny of the Tamils was more important for them than their own destinies. The political leaders did not do their duty to prevent such disasters.

      The militant people killed a leader of a religious organization in the Orrisa State on 19 March, 2009. The print media blacked out this. Had the system belonged to others, it would have published this in bold letters and discussed it for months.

     The Chief of the CIA called on the Home Minister of India at New Delhi on 19 March, 2009.

      Some Information Technology Companies at Trivandrum ousted some of their employees on 19 March, 2009. The Government ignored it. Hiring is common in India. But firing is uncommon. Therefore, such companies must be taken over by the Government instantly in the Satyam model. Otherwise, they would hire the boys through one campus and fire them through another campus under one pretext or other. The Government shall not lose its control over the companies.

      The Madras High Court on 20 March, 2009 ruled that the banks could extend educational loans to the poor and the meritorious only.

      Knowledge is liberation. This is what the sages say. Now the people are going to vote without the knowledge of this work. Naturally, the election to the 15th Parliament would not lead to the liberation of the people.

       The facts from 23 February, 2009 to 20 March, 2009 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 21 March, 2009 through email.

V.SABARIMUTHU

Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. 629167

INDIA.