186-Supreme Court of India -Criminal Breach of Trust and Conspiracy

186

Criminal Breach of Trust and Conspiracy

The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 6 September 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC), Chief Justice of India   and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai and Calcutta High Courts.  It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

          The Business Line, on 12 September 2011, said that the economy was all set to a slow down.

          The Hindu published the answers of Chief Minister Oommen Chandy to some carefully selected questions in its issue on 12 September 2011. This is a small reward for the 82 acre plot given to the TCS by the Government of Kerala recently. The leader of the opposition, Mr. V.S. Achuthanandan,   did not attach any significance to this.

A Mr. Satfir Singh, submitted before Metropolitan Magistrate Tyagita Singh that Anna Hazare and his team had instigated the people to lay a siege on the houses of many Members of Parliament (MPs) and ministers to press their demand for an anti-corruption bill. Ordinarily, others would not have got bail for such offences because their motive was not curbing corruption. However, the Delhi Police, on 16 September 2011, told the court that they had not received any complaint.

In this connection, it may be recalled an MP said in Parliament that the supporters of Anna Hazare had attacked his house.

The Supreme Court is conspicuous by its silence in the above matter.

According to some reports, the CBI is investigating the assets of Reddy brothers in Indonesia. This is to find out whether they used the money earned by them - through illegal mining – to buy assets in that country. They are in jail now. The CBI is relentlessly questioning them

According to a theory, the act of sending all small entrepreneurs to jail would lead to the construction of India, and the act of using the public assets for public investments would lead to the destruction of India. The legality or otherwise is not the basis for the action of the CBI. Otherwise, the case booked under the official secret act would not have gone into oblivion. Former Supreme Court judge Santosh Hegde and the other crusaders of corruption are not ready to mention even the Medical Council of India (MCI) case. This theory could be called Santosh Hegdeism.

Mr. Ram Jethmalini, an MP and eminent advocate, declared that due to the sacrifice of the leaders, the humblest citizen in India got freedom of speech. This is, actually, his reply to this work. The New Indian Express published this - as a centre page article - on 21 September 2011.

Ram Jethmalini knew that the freedom of expression is the freedom of the people to know the views of others, and not at all the freedom to talk anything in a tea shop or write letters like this.

The people actually think that there exists 100 per cent freedom of expression in India.

But anyone going through this work will tell that there is 100 per cent denial of freedom of expression in India.

Otherwise, the people might have seen this work.

Incidentally, the view of Ram Jethmalini shows that the reputation of a judge of the Supreme Court is a function of his manipulation power.

The militant people, on 25 September 2011, killed an MLA and his body guard in the Orissa State. The learned judges of the Supreme Court might have compared the murder to the act murdering the judges. Yet they are not ready to take remedial measures.

The CBI, on 26 September 2011, submitted before the CBI judge O.P.Saini that former Telecom Minister Mr. A.Raja and Mrs. Kanimozhi MP committed offences under section 409 (Criminal Breach of Trust) read with section 120  (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) because they “dishonestly” disposed of the valuable 2G spectrum in violation of the “existing policies” and the eligibility criterion, in order to confer wrongful gain on some private companies.

The CBI said that three private telecom firms should also be charged under section 409 for their collusion with three public servants in getting the spectrum.   

The circumstances that forced the CBI to invoke sections 409 and 120 against Raja must be analyzed in the proper perspective.

The illegality is intrinsic in the decision of former Prime Minister Vajpayee to give the spectrum - arbitrarily - adopting a principle unknown to man kind. But the Supreme Court does not see any illegality in that policy.

 Further, former Prime Minister Vajpayee sold a few Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) not only in violation of the Constitution of India but also against the guidelines devised for selling them. The Supreme Court knew this.

Above all, the present Government is continuously converting public money into private money with the knowledge of the Supreme Court.

But the CBI is afraid of using the word “dishonest” against the learned judges of the Supreme Court. Therefore, it is using the word against Raja so that the highest institution in India would undergo a metamophosis.

Therefore, the charge-sheet must be read as follows.

The learned judges of the Supreme Court committed offences under section 409 read with section 120 of the IPC because they “dishonestly” refused to enforce freedom of expression, and connived at the disposal of the valuable public assets and public money in an unconstitutional way and in violation of the “existing policies” and the eligibility criterion, in order to confer wrongful gain on some private companies.

As the Supreme Court cannot deny the above charge, it is not giving a reply to 185 letters.

Now, the media and the principal opposition party, the BJP, wanted the resignation of Union Home Minister Chithambaram because he –rather than Raja- was responsible for taking the licence route to apportion the 2G spectrum.

To the above, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on 27 September 2011, said that some forces –with the intention destabilizing the polity- were making attempts to force early elections. He added that Chithambaram enjoyed his full confidence. In this way he said that he – not Raja or Chithabaram - was solely responsible for taking the licence route.

 Manmohan Singh had been a bureaucrat. The manipulators had inducted him in the Union Cabinet even before asking him to face an election. Therefore, he knew the meaning of the move of the media.

 Chithambaram had been a lawyer. The manipulators inducted him into the Union Government directly. As the Finance Minister of India under Prime Minister Deve Gowda, he deposited the surplus money of the PSUs in the Unit Trust of India (UTI). During the period of Prime Minister Vajpayee, he advised him to sell the PSUs to private parties. Recently, he wanted to help some private parties to buy assets abroad. Therefore, when the manipulators turned against him, he became speechless.

The manipulators are not persisting with their demand. However, the fact that they demanded his resignation for four or five days is a great development in India. In fact, it puzzled the common man.

The Business Line, on 22 September 2011, said that a recently signed pact - between India, and Bangladesh - might open the door of India to Chinese fabrics. Some manipulators are doing round the clock work to convert India into a vassal state of China. They have to do this for the commission they received from China.

The Supreme Court, on 22 September 2011, ordered multi-layered security for Padmanabhaswamy Temple at Trivandrum. There would be a no fly zone above the Temple.

Now, the temple is a target of attack for the enemies. Therefore, there must be an Air Force station at Trivandrum. For this,   the measures taken to protect the buildings like White House, Parliament House may be implemented.

The Supreme Court did not issue any order to finish the valuation work within a few days.

In this connection, it must be stated that it is against public interest to take 8 to 12 months to do the valuation work. Any mathematician will tell that probability –rather than possibility- acquires credibility when there is large number of similar articles. Therefore, Supreme Court could ascertain the views of mathematicians in this matter and complete the valuation work within a month.

The Hindu, on 29 September 2011, reported that 22 Indian traders accused of diamond smuggling had been languishing in China for more than 600 days. The paper revealed that they had evaded $7.3 million in custom duties.

90 per cent of the toys and the other plastic items present in the shops all over India are from China. All are illegally imported items. Even blind men sell illegally imported Chinese articles. But India has no eye to see this. As a result, 90 per cent of the industries have perished. At the same time, Indian traders are languishing in Chinese jails. The Supreme Court is in the know of commission of this offence.

 

Mr. Prasant Bhusan, appearing for the Centre for Public Interest Litigation in the 2G spectrum case, told the Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Singhvi and Ganguly that the CBI was “dishonest” in its investigation.

The CBI is carefully shielding Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in the 2G spectrum case even though everything happened with his knowledge.  Further, the case is being monitored by the Supreme Court.

The CBI could be a biased one. It might enact a coup against the Government or Union Ministers. In these conditions, the Supreme Court takes charge of monitoring only to make the probe an impartial one. Naturally, an investigation monitored by the Supreme Court –ordinarily- cannot be a “dishonest” one.

Therefore, the above advocate used the word “dishonest” against the Supreme Court rather than against the CBI.

The learned judges chose not to take action against the advocate because they are not monitoring the case in an impartial way.  Naturally, the Supreme Court, as an institution, does not possess the critical energy badly needed to proceed against him.

 Union Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee, in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on 27 September 2011, stated that several departments –department of the prime minister included - had played a role in the decision to adopt the license route for spectrum allocation.

The manipulators demanded the resignation of Home Minister Chithambaram because the 2G spectrum had been allotted with his knowledge. But, when Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee said that everything happened with the knowledge of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, the media went into a cocoon. This shows that they want to protect the image of the Supreme Court and the Prime Minister in the 2G spectrum case.

The direct consequence of the above development is that the Supreme Court would have to depend upon the media to save its face.

Mr. Prasant Bhushan told the Supreme Court bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and A.K.. Ganguly, on 29 September 2011, that Reliance Group, Tatas and some others gave donations to a non profit organization just three days before the issuance of letter of intent for the grant of 2G licences. The CBI agreed that the donations were “suspicious”

To the total discomfiture of the Supreme Court, CBI senior counsel K.K. Venugopal , on the same day, submitted before the same bench that three officials of the Reliance Group, arrested in connection with the 2G case, might turn approvers. They had told the CBI that they were mere employees and in no way benefited monetarily.

The above developments show that some officers of the CBI remain under a state of motion. They are trying to execute the executioners! However, the Supreme Court might make them motionless. They might be even divested of all authority to unravel the case.

Whatever happens, the fact that some officials of the CBI dared to touch the men remaining under a six - tier security system is a remarkable one. No wonder the www.moneycontrol.com described the CBI action as “a figment of imagination”, “dream” “fiddling with this peculiar facts” “without any legal significance”  “projecting this for public consumption” and “cavalier attitude”.

The Hindu, on 30 September 2011, disclosed that the Union Government would borrow about Re. 4 lakh crore during 2011-2012.

The Union Government gave Re. 3.5 lakh crore in the Provident Fund (PF) to two or three people. They converted it into Re. 7.5 lakh crore in three years. Now, the Government is extracting Re.4 lakh crore from all over India.  Prabab Mukherjee  did not even think of recovering the money given to the UTI as bail out package. The Supreme Court was in the know of commission of this offence.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), on 30 September 2011, said that the international asset of the country stood at $ 435.6 billion, and the international financial liabilities stood at $ 669.2 billion. It disclosed that the direct investment abroad stood at $ 103.9 billion. It did not disclose the amount of public money converted into private assets abroad.

Mr. Tushar A. Gandhi, the great grandson of Mahatma Gandhi – in a centre page article in The New Indian Express on 1 October 2011 - claimed that the philosophy of Gandhiji was based on the cornerstone of truth, love, non-violence and peace, all of which were as old as the rivers and mountains. He added that the method adopted by him evolved from his philosophy.

The method of undertaking fasting and the call to the students through the media to boycott classes are to create violence and unrest. Even processions and public meetings would create unrest when the media work behind them. Therefore, the method adopted by Gandhiji was not at all a non-violent one. England tried to make it a non-violent one. Yet many people died due to the freedom struggle. Just as the media created Anna Hazare to perpetrate Santosh Hegdeism, Gandhiji was created to perpetrate slavery.

 Gandhiji could have –just like the present writer- persisted with writing letters to the competent authorities to achieve his goal, if he had any faith in non violence.

Justice K.N. Basha of the Chennai High Court, on 30 September 2011, quashed the 14 year old gift case against Chief Minister Jayalalitha.

The case was that she- while in office as the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu- received Re. 2crore in demand drafts as birthday gifts in 1992.

The reason for quashing the proceedings was: 1. The “callous and inordinate delay” in completing the criminal proceedings. Citing the Supreme Court, the judge said that the petitioner’s constitutional right to speedy trial enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution stood flagrantly violated and 2. As she had shown the Re. 2 crore gift in her Income Tax return, she did not commit any offence.

A chief minister could receive a huge amount as commission while buying and selling. Even for buying drugs there are commissions. A chief minister of Tamil Nadu could receive about Re.2000 crore every year as commission for buying liquor alone. Therefore, Re. 2 crore is a very small amount.

Further, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had given to private parties more than $200 billion during his stint as the Finance Minister of India. He gave equal amount in the last seven years to some private parties. The gift he received for this favour was the posts of the finance minister of India and the prime minister of India.

After paying floral tribute at the Gandhiji’s statue in Geneva on 2 October 2011, Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, touched the chin of a 10 –year old Indian girl.

President Pratibha Patil had secretly allowed her Government to give Re. 3.5 lakh crore to three boys. The recipients earned Re.4.5 lakh crore within three years. Further, she is continuously allowing her Government to transmit public money into the hands of private parties. After doing this heinous job, she is touching the chin of innocent girls!

Infosys Chairman NR Naraya Murthy, on 5 October 2011, said that the engineers coming out of the IITs were not of good quality.

When the present writer pointed out the fact that the mark obtained by a student in the IIT-JEE is not an index of his intelligence but an index of the coaching, the media did not publish it. Now, there is a great debate.

Army Chief Gen. V.K. Singh, on 5 October 2011, said that China had deployed about 4000 troops in Pak Occupied Kashmir (PoK).

The Union Government decided to establish 74 CBI courts to try corruption cases.

If the Supreme Court could allow the Government to convert public assets into private assets, even 7400 CBI courts would be useless. The prime minister would convert public assets into private assets without answering thousands letters from any citizen of India. In fact, the act of catching the small fish after sparing the big fish is fast becoming a human rights problem in India.

The Department of Vigilence and Anti   Corruption (DVAC), raided the premises of former DMK Minister Pannerselvam and his relatives. Earlier it had raided houses of former ministers K.N. Nehru, K. Ponmudy and T.M. Anbarasan.

The DVAC has raided at least 10 premises of each former minister. This shows that they might have earned about Re. 200 crore to Re. 2000 crore each. But it must be compared to the Re 4.5 lakh crore earned by two or three manipulators.

The Supreme Court is not doing anything to establish justice in India.

After receiving 184 letters of this writer, the Union Government requested the Supreme Court to redress the grievances of this writer.

The Supreme Court could have defined the acts of corruption to put an end to corruption.

Or it could have said “no” to conversion of public assets into private assets. This two letter word might have saved 1000 million people.

Alternatively, it could have enforced freedom of expression.

It is not ready to even publish the letter sent by the Department of Justice to the Registrar (Judicial) Supreme Court of India. 

Does the Supreme Court not walk among 1000 million people as if they were animals?

   The facts from 6 September 2011 to 6 October 2011 are being submitted to Mrs.Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 7 October 2011.

             The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner and the Chief Justices of some High Courts for necessary action.

V.Sabarimuthu.

26-3 Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN:629167

Kanyakumari District

           

185 A letter from Ministry of Law & Justice, Government of India.

185

THE NUCLEUS

 The present writer submitted his last mail to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 29 August 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC)   and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai and Calcutta High Courts.  It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

          The CD - that mentioned the bribe of Re 4 crore - was a genuine one. The CBI, on 30 August 2011, officially revealed this.                                                               

In this connection, it must be noted that Justice Singvi and Justice Ganguly together had sent Union Minister Raja to jail. The advocate of the petitioners in that case was Mr. Prasant Bhusion.

The CD shows that former Telecom Minister Raja had to go to jail presumably because of the nexus between the judges, and some manipulators. This is the reason why the Supreme Court should have probed the nexus between Prasant Bhusion, and Justice  Singhvi.

       An MP, on 30 August 2011, alleged that the supporters of Anna Hazare had attacked his house, and he wanted protection to his family. Many others might have encountered similar problem. This shows that the media had been concealing many things that had been happening during the fasting of Anna Hazare.

                                                                                               

        The Indian Navy, on 30 August 2011, said China had been studying the topography of the Bay of Bengal using a fishing vessel equipped with 22 laboratories. The vessel finally entered the Sri Lankan waters.

           This shows that Sri Lanka is indulging in anti India activities. India had invited this trouble to help some middle men.

          Even now, the Union Government is encouraging imports from China.  Many State Governments are being persuaded to buy articles from China for free distribution without obtaining a “No Objection Certificate (NOC)” from the Indian manufacturers. It is  a treasonable offence.

          The Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) and the British Petroleum (BP) announced the completion of the BP’s acquisition of 30 per cent shares in 21 oil and gas sharing contracts. Anna Hazare and his adherents did not utter a word against this. But, this is an act of corruption.

          After freezing the bank accounts, the Enforcement Directorate, (ED), attached the properties of five companies in connection with the bribe of Re.200 crore paid to Kalainger TV for the 2G spectrum. 

        A preliminary enquiry indicated that some private companies violated the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) in this issue.

        The ED had identified the properties of Kalaignar TV worth Re.215 crore located in different parts of Tamil Nadu. Apparently, they were not attached till date.

     The ED disclosed the above on 31 August 2011.

      It must be noted that if the Government had given Re.3 lakh crore – in the Provident Fund (PF) - to an imbecile, he would have bought gold and kept it in a dark chamber. The money would have grown into Re. 7.5 lakh crore. In this way also, the recipients of the PF money keep Re.4.5 lakh crore as black money. The Government is not ready to recover this huge amount but runs after Re. 3 crore, Re.30 crore and Re. 300 crore in the pretext of preventing money laundering.

         In order to break the cartel of the existing players, Raja might have expected some small entrepreneurs to enter the Telecom Sector. The new entrants might have wanted the Government to allot the spectrum based on the precedent. As a result, some of them might have got the spectrum. As it is a gold mine, the beneficiaries might have given some money to some people.

       If Raja had allotted the spectrum in any other illegal way, the existing players would have cornered the entire spectrum with their unlimited money. They, in turn, would have kept him as a Cabinet Minister. Besides, they would have given him Re. hundreds of thousands of crore directly or indirectly.

           When the Prime Minister latently expects a minister under him to do an illegal favour, the natural tendency of the young ministers would be to fulfill his wishes. This would  strengthen  their position in the Cabinet. It is incredible that Raja resisted this and acted fully consistent with the Constitution of India.

           Further, as a member of the Union Cabinet, Raja might have stoutly opposed the conversion of public assets into private assets.

         If this conclusion comes near to the true picture, the sacrifice of Raja will go down as a great one.

       Whatever happened, the developments show that India has not generated a better Union Minister than Raja. Nothing could be achieved without sacrifice. Let his supreme sacrifice lead to the emancipation of 1000 million people.

           In this connection, it must be noted that the CBI is slowly coming near to the nucleus of the Indian system. It says – it is the most important point - that some people paid money to Raja and his associates as quid pro quo for the favours in the allotment of spectrum.

           Obviously, the present Union Ministers got their present post – again it is the crucial point – as quid pro quo for converting public assets into private assets. Even President Pratibha Devisingh Patil is not an exception to this. Anyone would agree that this act is more heinous than the act of receiving money for various favours. Raja would not have received money from anyone is a different matter.

         The CBI, on 1 September 2011, told the Supreme Court that the alleged element of coercion by former Telecom Minister Dayanidhi Maran in the sale of Sivasankaran’s Aircel to Malasian based Maxis company had not been  established.

         If Sivasankaran had demanded five licenses besides his existing licenses, Minister Dayanidhi Maran should have granted 10 licenses to him within a span of ten minutes. The CBI had been talking like this to bring him down from the Union Cabinet.

           Dayanidhi Maran might be the prodigal son of Mr. Murasoli Maran. He might have overtaken many other senior leaders in his party to become a Union Minister. He might have assets disproportionate to his known sources of income. He might have wanted to buy the assets of others. There may be an underground tunnel – for cables- between the BSNL office and the SUN TV.

           Notwithstanding the above, the fact that he was forced to quit the Union Cabinet makes him a great man.

         In what way he would act in future cannot be predicted. But, anyone could be proud of him because he acquitted himself well in the Union Cabinet.

         The Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) decided to hand over the money to seven private parties. They would keep the money as gold or utilize the money for lending purposes.

         The Government does not give money to any citizen of India for lending purposes. The decision of the Government is out and out unconstitutional. It is an act of corruption. The beneficiaries keep many people as ministers as quid pro quo for this money. Besides, they use this money for the denial of freedom.

          Union Finance Minister Pranab Mukergee, on 2 September 2011, described Anna Hazare as a popular leader.  The latter couldn’t have been a popular leader if the former had not been committing the acts of corruption given below. The unlimited money produced headline news after headline news in the newspapers and in the TV channels.

The newspapers and TV channels function for money. Even to publish local news, the local TV channels demand money. Naturally, every word about Anna Hazare was to conserve the illegally amassed assets of the manipulators. This is how Anna Hazare became popular.

In contrast, the popularity of the present writer will have the effect of curbing the acts of corruption. Therefore, without the interference of the Supreme Court, the points present in this work would not reach the mind of the people through headline news.

Further, the comment of Minister Pranab Mukergee indicates that he – just like Prime Minister Manmohan Singh - was a party to the agitation launched by Anna Hazare.

Anna Hazare, on 2 September 2011, said that the Government was looting money. He predicted that another 15 years would be required to root out corruption.

Obviously, his words come from his masters.

It must be noted that he did not say how the Government was looting the nation.

           Everyone in India thinks that they lost something due to corruption. Therefore, they talk about corruption. The tragedy is that those who thieved the public assets stand in front of them and talk against corruption.

Thus, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh helped thieve more than Re.100 lakh crore in the last seven years. He also wants a strict law against corruption!

Having received hundreds of letters from this writer, former Judge of Supreme Court Santhosh Hegde, knew   that the act of: 1.Buying the shares of private companies using public money. 2. Selling the public assets against public money. 3. Granting tax exemption to investments in the hands of private parties. 5. Giving the public money to private parties for safe keeping and 6. Giving the natural assets like spectrum, oil to private parties - are the acts of corruption.

             Santosh Hedge could have taken action over the letters of the present writer during his stint in the Supreme Court. If he had any new suggestions, he could have written to the President of India, Supreme Court and the CBI.

    Further, he did not tell even an act of corruption. Therefore, exploiting the ignorance of the people, he wanted to perpetrate corruption. History has not seen a judge joining a crowd to negate the benefits of his own judgment.

        The recent judgment on the Uniform System of Education clearly said that the legislature should not negate the benefits of a judgment.

Therefore, the participation of Santhosh Hedge in the movement of Anna Hazare was a counter revolution that threatened the life of the President of India, learned judges of the Supreme Court, MPs and the people.

Therefore, it is imperative that he must be taken into custody under the National Security Act or any other relevant sections after telling the people the acts of corruption, and his silence over them. This would unearth the truth behind his participation.

If Anna Hazare and his other adherents had consciously concealed the acts of corruption, the same action will have to be taken against them also.

The Government would not mention the acts of corruption because it is a question of unlimited money and power. This is the reason why the Government is not taking action.  

Therefore, the Supreme Court must enforce freedom of expression for the exchange of truth.

A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Aftab Alam and R.M. Lodha on 2 September 2011 directed the Delhi Police to find out the donor of money in the cash –for- vote scandal within four weeks. The Delhi Police has not expressed its inability to find the donor. Therefore, it knew the donor.

In the Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple case, the Supreme Court bench comprising Justice R.V. Raveendran and Justice A.K. Patnaik observed that the change of stand by the royal family was not a right one.

There are reports that the valuation of the treasure would take about 8 to 12 months. This would exhaust the energy of all responsible observers.

The method of valuation depends on the knowledge of the experts. This varies from person to person. There will be always an uncertainty in the absolute value of the treasure.

Therefore, the treasure may be divided into 50 or 100 equivalent parts, and the value of one part ascertained. In this way, the valuation could be completed in one or two weeks.

Now, the people fear that one half of the treasure would disappear in eight months.

The Supreme Court must be ingenious at solving this problem.

The Union Ministers put their assets in a website on 3 September 2011. Accordingly, Minister A.K.Antony is the poorest and Minister Kamal Nath --with Re.276 crore - the richest. The ministers have done this to tell the people that they are not guilty of corruption. But they remain as the leaders of the people as quid pro quo for committing the above mentioned acts of corruption. No learned judge of the Supreme Court would deny this.

Mr. Janardhan Reddy and his brother-in-law B.V. Srinivas Reddy were arrested in the Karnataka State, on 5 September 2001, for illegal iron ore mining.

They grew because of the help of state level leaders. But their competitors in the national level did not relish it. Therefore, they may be divested of their properties as in the case of Mr. Ramalinga Raju of Satyam.

        In this connection, it may be reiterated that the natural assets of India is not the fortune any private individual. It is the property of 1000 million people. No private party has any right to buy, sell or enjoy it. But the present policy is “take the profit and give the  leadership”. It is an act of corruption.

   

Her Excellency the President of India had forwarded some letters of this writer to the Union Government. The Ministry of Law & Justice, Government of India, in turn, on 12 August 2001, forwarded a letter dated 04 -06-  2011  to the Registrar (Judicial), Supreme Court of India, New Delhi, to look into the grievances. This was in continuation of another letter forwarded to it on 29- 12 -2010. The present writer received the copy of the letter today.

The present writer sent 184 letters each to the President of India, Chief Justice of India and the CBI by ordinary post since 1 -6-2001. Until now, they washed their hand although many actions consistent with the letters were noticed.

Now, the Union Government has firmly said - in black and white - that “the subject matter of the letter pertains to the Supreme Court of India”. Thus the Government – in writing - says that it is not a policy decision pertaining to the economy but a question of rendering justice to Indians through the act of curbing corruption.

Now, the Supreme Court could at any moment give a list of the acts of corruption, and put an end to them.

The learned judges of the Supreme Court must cogitate over it and elevate their life to the highest platform.

Anyone would tell 1000 million people now stand between emancipation, and total slavery.

Everything remains in the hand of the Supreme Court.

            The facts from 29 August 2011 to 5 September 2011 are being submitted to Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 6 September 2011.

             The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner and the Chief Justices of some High Courts for necessary action.

V.Sabarimuthu.

26-3 Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN:629167

Kanyakumari District

184 Seeking the Prosecution of President Pratibha Devisingh Patil

184

           FALSE VALUES AND DELUSIVE WORDS

The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 21 August 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC)   and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai and Culcutta High Courts.  It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

          In the “money – for - vote case”   Amar Singh and three other Members of Parliament (MPs) belonging to the BJP party were charge – sheeted on 24 August 2011. The accused were not arrested.

         In the above case, the Delhi police did not disclose the identity of the real donor of money.

        It must be noted that a tape recorded conversation had depicted Amar Singh as a representative of the big industrial houses.

        Therefore, the Supreme Court must direct the Delhi Police to identify the real donor of money, lest the people would consider the learned judges of the Supreme Court as conspirators. It shall not hesitate to dispel the darkness from the mind of the people in this matter.

         

         12 militant people and an Army officer were killed in a gun battle in the Jammu & Kashmir State on 24 August 2011.

          Mr. A. Raja, former Telecom Minister, told Trial Court Judge O.P. Saini, that the media - instead of acting as an asylum for the society –turned into a slaughter house in his matter. He told the judge that he had been paying the price for annoying a cartel of telecom firms. He added that he was facing the music for enforcing one time spectrum charge beyond 6.2 MHZ.

          The Supreme Court, on 26 August 2011, banned iron ore mining in two more districts of the Karnataka State. The people fear that the Supreme Court is trying to hand over iron ore mining to the POSCO or to one of the “eight men” in charge of running the country.

         

          Human Resource Development Minister Kapil Sibal, on 26 August 2011, said that the Government had no proposal to enforce a uniform school education curriculum. This is, apparently, his reply to the last mail submitted to President Pratibha Patil.

          Minister Kapil Sibal, and therefore the Union Government, could have looked into this matter in the proper perspective.

          The students must have the freedom to study anything they want.

      But, the all India examinations - like the one conducted by the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT-JEE) - must be based on a uniform syllabus. All students all over India must be given a chance to study it. No out-of -syllabus question shall be asked. There must be a competent authority to check it. If the Government refuses to listen to this feeble voice, what will the ignorant people do?

          Further, the children find English very difficult only when it is introduced to them in the later classes. If it is taught in the pre LKC or LKC level, they will simply follow their teachers. The only condition is that orientation courses and refresher courses must be continuously conducted for the teachers.

          Supreme Court judge Markandey Katju, on 27 August 2011, wanted the judiciary to interpret the Constitution of India in such a way so that the nation would move into the modern age.

          Justice Katju would ignore the act of receiving commission for converting India into a vassal of China. He would not consider the act of giving Re. 3 lakh crore Provident Fund (PF) money to three boys as an act of corruption.    

          A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice Chandramauli Kumar dismissed the plea - of the former Chief Justice of Sikkim High Court, Dinakaran - that challenged the decision of a committee appointed by the Upper House.

          In this connection, it must be reiterated that many key cases of the Supreme Court go into the hand of Justice Singhvi. One half of the sitting judges of the Supreme Court are even now unknown to the people.

          Though it is a digression, it must be stated that a court in Pakistan ordered the confiscation of the property of the former President of Pakistan, Pervez Musharraf, for his failure to appear before it. In India, Mr. Ramalinga Raju was divested of his properties even without the intervention of the courts.

Further, the judges in India also possess great power. A Union Cabinet Minister is in jail. At the same time, even people charged under the Official Secret Act did not appear in any court!

      

          Conceding the demands of Anna Hazare, the Indian Parliament, on 27 August 2011, unanimously passed a resolution to enact a new Anti-corruption Act called Lok Pal. He ended his 13 - day fast on 28 August 2011.

          The people all over India find the Union Government weak. They think that corruption is stalking the nation.

      Many people still believe that former Telecom Minister Raja removed over Re. 1 lakh crore in the 2G spectrum allotment. They think that he would escape from the court because of the weakness of the Constitution of India.

       Some people believe that corruption in the lower level must be checked.

Some others attribute their sufferings to corruption in the highest level.

However, as ignorance governs their mind and tongue, they are unable to pin point any act of corruption.  

When Anna Hazare announced his decision to undertake a fast against corruption, the TV channels started giving great publicity to his words. The newspapers had been coming out with headline news about his fast. The people marveled at his ability to catch the attention of the downtrodden. Seldom they realized the fact that “the eight men” responsible for running the country were behind him.

When he started the fast, the people simply found their saviour in Anna Hazare. They considered him the modern day Gandhiji. They - in large numbers - came out of their house in support of his cause. They simply rocked Delhi for thirteen days.

The actors like Vijay, Amir Khan called on Anna Hazare. Students all over India came out of the classes. Processions were taken by the employees and others. Some undertook parallel fasting.

 Army Chief V.K. Singh described the agitation as the power of the people.

The agitation was reminiscent of the freedom struggle.

After breaking the fast, Anna Hazare described his movement as an example for the world. He said that the power of the people was greater than that of the Parliament. He considered it as a victory for India. He thanked the people and the media for making his fast a success.

Some said that the new Act would extirpate corruption and create a corruption- free India.

Some others said that all leaders in India were not cheats.

Some praised the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

If an election were conducted to-day, Anna Hazare would secure-at least- a simple majority in the Parliament. This shows that “the eight men” decide the destiny of the nation through their media wing.

If the proposal of Anna Hazare were translated into an Act of Parliament, the law enforcing agencies would have to get an order of a seven member Competent Committee, even, to investigate the acts of corruption of the Prime Minister of India.

Obviously, the avowed object of the Act is to protect the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and President Pratibha Devisingh Patil from the corruption charges leveled against them by the present writer (and others).

In contrast,  now any mere knowledge about the acts of corruption - that are officially allowed - will be sufficient for the President, Governors and the learned judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts to take deterrent measures. One would say that they connived at 183 letters from this writer. Surely, the mentally corrupt persons alone would have thrown the letters into the dust bin. All the rest must have taken one action or other.

There were five important adherents to Anna Hazare  - two bad actors of the Supreme Court known for the Re.4 crore, two people described as social activists - Ms. Kiran Bedi and Mr. Arvind Kejriwal and an unconscious actor called N.Santosh Hegde,  former judge of the Supreme Court.

Santosh Hegde received hundreds of letters of this writer during his stint in the Supreme Court. Therefore, he might have conveyed the various acts of corruption to Anna Hazare and others.

If Anna Hazare had told something about the method of utilization of the Re.3 lakh crore in the PF account, the crowd would have virtually thrown the President, MPs and the learned judges of the Supreme Court into the Indian Ocean. This did not happen.

Further, a five - judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court under Santosh Hegde on 5 November 2004 granted permission to the Governors to act independently in corruption matters. The present writer pointed out this in the last letter. He might have got scent of this. Since then, he was conspicuous by his absence in the team of Anna Hazare.

However, when the fast came to an end, he reappeared to express his happiness. Nietzsche says that false values and delusive words are the worst monsters for mortals.

After Anna Hazare had ended his fast, the Union Government decided to sell the shares of the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs)

In this connection, it must be stated that the President of India is not only the Supreme Commander of the armed forces but also the custodian of the wealth of the nation.

Therefore, it is the paramount duty of the President to prevent big acts of corruption. It is not necessary that someone must send 183 letters for this. The President might get a piece of information from newspapers, TV channels, any citizen or even the last grade servant in the Presidential Palace. The President must confidentially ascertain the veracity of such pieces of information from the Prime Minister. Then, the President must disclose it to the nation. Naturally, criminal prosecution will follow.

Here, the President Pratibha Devisingh Patil supported the acts of corruption by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. As a result Re. 3 lakh crore from the PF secretly went in the hands of three boys.

If the recipients had traded in gold, they would have converted it into Re. 9 lakh crore in three years. Naturally about Re. 3 to 6 lakh crore remains in their hand as black money.

In this matter, President Pratibha Devisingh Patil – just like Manmohan Singh and Santosh Hedge - uses delusive words.  She is not ready to take action –consistent with the Constitution of India- against Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

Evidently, she could have chosen to steal Re.100 lakh crore rather than accepting the post of the President of India.

Therefore, the Chief Justice of India is requested to grant permission to this writer to prosecute President Pratibha Devisingh Patil for the corruption in the Re. 3 lakh crore  PF money. A copy of this letter is submitted to him through post for this.

The Chief Justice of India is requested to treat this as a formal letter.

         The facts from 21 August 2011 to 28 August 2011 are being submitted to Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 29 August 2011.

          The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner and the Chief Justices of some High Courts for necessary action.

V.Sabarimuthu.

26-3 Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN:629167

Kanyakumari District