549.The Supreme Court of India. Accept responsibility for Sri Lankan firing, woodcutters, militancy, elections and others..

549

The Supreme Court of India. Accept responsibility for Sri Lankan firing, woodcutters, militancy, elections and others..

          Sri Lankan Navy shot dead a 21 year old Indian fisherman and wounded another on 7 March 2017.

          The fishermen have not received the dead body. An agitation is going on at Thankachimadam in Tamil Nadu.

          The government of Tamil Nadu and the political parties in Tamil Nadu, as usual, condemned the killing.

          There was a 3 minute discussion in the Parliament over this matter. The Government said that the Vice President of India had conveyed the concern of India to Sri Lanka during a scheduled meeting.

          Sri Lanka released 85 Indian fishermen from jail to assuage the feelings of the people.

          The Prime Minister of India chose not to utter a word.

          Sri Lanka killed over 500 Indian fishermen before this incident.

          The present man had wanted the Government of India to deny landing facilities in India to the Sri Lanka bound planes to settle the fishermen problem.

          In Letter No. 151, the present man asked Sri Lanka not to wage a war against India.

          In another letter, the present man said that the USA would have resorted to Libyan type bombing as retaliation.

          After that there was a lull in the firing. In fact, Sri Lanka, on 29 September 2010, gave a solemn assurance that there would not be further incidence of harm to Indian fisherman.

          Despite the assurance, Sri Lanka has added one more murder to its credit.

          Therefore, it is imperative that India must suspend over flight facilities to all Sri Lanka bound aircraft until a permanent solution is found.

          The firing occurred because the suggestions given by the present man did not percolate to the masses.

          We will not solve the problem. We will not take any step to give freedom either. This is the stand of the Supreme Court of India.

          Therefore, the Supreme Court of India must accept full responsibility for the incident. By denying freedom of expression, it simply allowed Sri Lanka to eat Indians.

          Now, it must release this letter to the press to pave the way for a full settlement to the satisfaction of the Indian fishermen.

          The Andra Pradesh police, on 10 March 2017, captured over 200 sandal wood cutters of Tamil Nadu. Among the captured woodcutters were some postgraduates.

          The Government of Andra Pradesh treats the woodcutters like animals.  There are many violations of human rights. It is like man eating man.

          About ten men remove all public resources of the nation. The Supreme Court of India facilitates this illegal theft by denying freedom of expression. This leads to economic deprivation and unemployment. There are 81 lakh unemployed people in Tamil Nadu alone.

          Therefore, the Supreme Court of India must accept full responsibility for such happenings.

          A seven judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India comprising Chief Justice J.S.Khekar and Justices Misra, J. Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Madan B. Lokur, P.C. Ghose and Kurian Joseph, on 10 March 2017, issued a warrant against Justice Karnan of the Culcutta High Court for denigrating the judicial institution.

          The decision is like man eating man.

Justice Karnan described the warrant as a motivated and unconstitutional one. He added that he was targeted for being a member of the Scheduled Caste.

The accusations of Justice Karnan were a partial reflection of this work.

He did not even say that the judges deny freedom of expression. All his charges were nothing compared to this.

The development is due to the denial of freedom of expression. The Supreme Court of India must accept responsibility for it.

The militant people, on 11 March 2017, killed 12 soldiers at Bhejji on the Andra Pradesh – Chhattisgarh border.

The Supreme Court of India must accept full responsibility for the incident as it exploits the natural resources of the people.

A three judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India did try to harness the greatest evil. It proclaimed that all natural resources must be taken over by the Government. This happened on 7 May 2010. But the three judges in the Bench settled for plum postings. The ruling class gave a posting to Justice Balakrishnan in the National Human Rights Commission. Some cases were filed against his son.  Justice Sathasivam was given the post of a Governor of Kerala. Justice Sudharshan Reddy might have gone down like Justice Kirpal although nothing is known about him. It must be recalled that Justice Kirpal had landed in the Reliance Industries Ltd.

Then the 2G verdict and the coal verdict virtually buried the  May 7, 2010 judgement.

Now the letters are being submitted to the armed forces. The officers of the armed forces have, in turn, used the letters to secure postings in the Government - like Gen.V.K. Singh - or in other areas. The tragedy is that many do maximum injustice in the areas they occupy.

Ten men remove the entire public resources through the aid of the Supreme Court of India. So long as the exploitation of the people by them continues, there will be attempts to subvert the existing order. The killings, revolts and uprisings and letters are various forms of agitations. The Supreme Court of India must give maximum respect to letters because the letters are the most peaceful method of agitation.. It shall not conceal the letters from the people at all. The act of concealing this work is not its duty.

In the elections to five states, the ruling BJP secured two third majority in Utter Pradesh and Uttarkhand. The Congress Party won Punjab.  Goa and Manipur delivered fractured mandates.

Miss. Mayavathi, the leader of the BSP doubted the credibility of the electronic voting machines. The Election Commission of India (ECI) must complement machine voting by ballot voting also. This would dispel the doubts.

If the Supreme Court of India had not denied freedom to Indians, the nominees of the present man would have won the elections. This conclusion is based on the perception that the people judge men by what they did rather than by what they are likely to do.

Therefore, the Supreme Court of India must accept full responsibility for installing illegitimate governments.

So long as the nation reels in the hand of illegitimate governments, the exploitation of the people by the ten men will continue.

Therefore, Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi like people alone would celebrate the results.

This is letter No.548

   The facts from 8 March 2017 to 11 March 2017 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 12-3-2017.

12- 3-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

548. The Supreme Court of India: Bending to injustice?

548

The Supreme Court of India: Bending to injustice?

          There are reports that Mr. Sekhar Reddy and others have resumed the removal of the natural resources like sand from the Tamil Nadu State.

          The Government stopped the removal of sand by the private miners when the law enforcing agencies found a huge amount of new currency notes in the house of Mr. Sekhar Reddy. As a result, the sand prices increased by over Re.11000 per truck.

          Now, the sand mining goes on unabated.

          Evidently, the political parties, government and the media are united in the removal of the natural resources by the private parties.

          According to some reports, one square metre of beach sand yields Re.1 crore in the international market because of the presence of rare earth minerals. Anyone can imagine the money going in the hand of private parties.

          Reinforcing this, the Union Government – on 6 March 2017- decided to privatize three steel plants- Salem steel plant in the Tamil Nadu State included. The media reported this on 7 March 2017.

          We will remove the natural resources of India. In fact, all natural resources belong to us. About ten men possessing power in India talk like this.

          These ten men have greater power over the lives and fortunes of people than the Parliament, law enforcing agencies and the Supreme Court of India put together.

          This happens because the Supreme Court of India bends to injustice.

          This is letter No.547

   The facts from 5 March 2017 to 7 March 2017  are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 8-3-2017.

8- 3-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

547. The Supreme Court of India: Liberate 1000 million people

547

The Supreme Court of India: Liberate 1000 million people

          There are reports that the premium income of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) would exceed Re. 2 lakh crore during the financial year 2016-2017.

          The LIC extracts money from all over India. The effective return from the LIC is not even 10 per cent of the total amount paid as premium. Yet, many people want to be the policy holders of the LIC. There are many reasons for this.

          As the LIC is a Public Sector Undertaking (PSU), the people – as a rule- think that their investments are secure. They think that their investments would go for nation building.     Another reason is that the government gives a small income tax rebate for the investments in the LIC. 

Man is mortal. So he must leave something for his children in the event of his early death. This is another reason.

Further, the LIC tells the people that they would get a sizable amount of money after maturity. Many poor people consider investments in the LIC as a kind of saving. They seldom realize the simple fact that the money value would fall very rapidly.

What is important is the deployment of funds by the LIC.

Partly, due to the letters sent by the present man, the LIC stepped up its money deployment in government securities and Public Sector Undertakings.

However, one can discern a definite pattern in the utilization of the money.

It hands over a huge amount of money to about 10 people in the pretext of buying the shares of their companies. About 300 others get a small amount. It deployed about 3 lakh crore in the financial year 2015 to these companies. The beneficiaries buy back the shares as and when they get money. Therefore, the LIC does not hold more than, say, 10 per cent shares of any company. Only in rare cases, it holds up to 20 per cent shares of any company at a time. So the beneficiaries mint money without paying interest for the money obtained from the LIC.

There are over a million other entrepreneurs in India. They get nothing. If they want money, they must take loan. But the LIC says that people’s money is for people’s welfare. 

This vitiates Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

The beneficiaries rule India by keeping suitable men as political leaders. The words of the political leaders chosen by them alone are heard all over India.

The officers of the LIC also get suitable reward. Some get the reward in the form of post retirement placement in their companies with pay and allowances consistent with their degree of co-operation. These are acts of corruption.

The extraction of money by the LIC leads to flight of capital. It causes great economic deprivation all over India. This is a fraud on the Constitution of India.

The act of disturbing this system will be to the advantage of mankind.

But the beneficiaries control the mind of the judges of the Supreme Court of India.  So the judges fail to liberate 1000 million people from their present bondage. No wonder,  the Chief Justice of India does not acknowledge the letters from the citizens.

The result is that all attempts to free 1000 million people from their rule end in vain.

Therefore, the beneficiaries of the LIC continue to rule India through their chosen men.

This is letter No.546

   The facts from 28 February 2017 to 5 March 2017  are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 6-3-2017.

6- 3-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

546. Neduvasal Agitation

546

Neduvasal Agitation

          The Indian Army cancelled a recruitment examination due to question paper leakage. The media reported it on 27 February 2017.

          Distrust exists even in an examination conducted by the Indian Army.

          Evidently, there must be state wise reservation for all India seats like the IAS, IIFT, CAT, GATE. This is for social, educational and economic equality mentioned in the Constitution of India.

          The judges of the Supreme Court of India come from different states. What do they gain for themselves, for their own children, for their own communities or for own states by the present methods of selection? Will it cause any harm to anyone, if the seats are apportioned equitably? Why do they fail to understand this? Is it an intangible one? Why do they sow seeds of discord?

          An agitation is going on at Neduvasal in the Tamil Nadu State against the exploitation of natural gas by the public sector Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC). The Union Government had- in private interest- auctioned the exploration to the Great Eastern Energy Corporation Limited (GEECL) for virtually nothing.

          The Government of India must take over all natural assets and hand over them to the State Governments. The ONGC also must be split and handed over to the states. Let every state exploit the natural assets under their own Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs).

          Now the government exploits the natural assets only to hand over them to the private parties.

          If the natural assets are taken over by the government, we cannot survive. If we cannot control public mind, India would perish. This is the stand of the business houses.

          A Mr. Sekher Reddy had been removing the river sand in the Tamil Nadu State. He was arrested in a case. As a direct consequence, the sand prices increased from Re. 27000/- to Re. 38000/- per truck. The people are being forced to pay Re.11000 more for every truck of river sand.

          The natural assets must be given to the ruling class. Otherwise, the people must pay for it. This is the message of the manipulators.

This is letter No.546

   The facts that happened on 27 February 2017 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 28-2-2017.

28-2-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

545:The SBI merger. A fraud on the Constitution of India.

545

The SBI merger. A fraud on the Constitution of India.

          Mumbai is the richest city in India with a combined wealth of $ 820 billion. Delhi comes second with $ 450 billion and Bangaluru stands third with $320 billion.

          The financial institutions like the LIC, Banks drain the money all over India and empty it in Mumbai mainly in the pretext of buying shares.  The companies buy-back the shares after multiplying their wealth leaving the financial institutions with virtually nothing. This is a fraud on the Constitution of India. The Supreme Court of India alone can prevent it.

          The organizers of Marina Uprising have started a political party. A daily, Thina Thanthi, reported it on 26 February 2017. The other newspapers and the TV channels blacked this out.

          If the Supreme court of India had asked the media the reason for concealing this work from the eye of the people, the present man would have become the Prime Minister of India long ago. The system should not do this to everyone.

          Therefore, the Supreme Court of India must direct the media to disclose the brain behind the uprising and report his words for at least five years to know about his capabilities.   

            If it is not feasible of compliance, it must tell why other leaders are being heard.

          Former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu Mr. Paneerselvam, on 26 February 2017, said that he wanted to rescue Tamil Nadu from Ms. Sasikala family.

          The ruling class of Tamil Nadu is slightly different from Ms. Sasikala family because it is the back room player of every political party.

          Some people take the natural assets and the public money of Tamil Nadu. They are the ruling class.

          This ruling class mint unlimited money and controls the political parties and the public mind.

          Apparently, some TV channels are under the control of   Ms. Sasikala. But, those channels are not free. If they are free, she would not have gone to jail.

          Even now, she prefers to remain in jail rather than contributing her share for the freedom of Indians.

          Mr. Paneerselvam solved two or three day-to-day problems during his stint as chief minister. But he did not touch the core issues. Now, he must explain how he is distinguished by devotion to public duty.

          The President of the USA, Mr. Donald Trump, says that a wall would be constructed along the Mexico- USA border to prevent illegal migration. Further, he vowed to punish American companies for moving jobs.

          He wants to make everything in the USA. Where will he go for the unskilled labour force? The USA would suffer due to the proposed border wall.

          An Indian engineer, Mr. Srinivas was shot dead in the USA on 24 February 2017. This is shocking news. Perhaps, President of the USA Mr.Trump does not distinguish the legal migrants from illegal migrants. A part of the reason is Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi. The reason was given earlier.

The Union Government, on 22 February 2017, issued a gazette notification for the merger of the State Bank of India (SBI) with its five associate banks. According to the notification, the merger is on 1 April 2017. The media sparingly reported this on 26 February 2017.

          It is clear that the Supreme Court of India did not take any suitable action over the Letter No. 543 dated 16 -2-2017.

          It should have, at least, asked the media the reason for not disclosing the contents of the letter to the people. This would have given birth to a new democratic order.

          It did not do so. It did not understand the right to freedom. The present Chief Justice of India and the other judges must severally and collectively accept responsibility for the unconstitutional merger and for keeping India as a monopoly of a few people.

          Actually, it is another fraud on the Constitution of India.

This is letter No.545

   The facts from 23 February 2017 to 26 February 2017 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 27-2-2017.

27-2-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

544. The Biggest Contractor

544

The Biggest Contractor

Former Union Minister Mr. Subramonia Swamy, on 20 February 2017, alleged that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Directorate of Enforcement (ED) and the Department of Income Tax (IT) did not act upon his complaint against former Union Minister Mr. P. Chithambaram and his son, Mr. Karthi Chithambaram, due the pressure exerted by the system. He added that he had submitted a list of 21 secret bank accounts of the father son duo to the above agencies.

If his revelations are true, Mr. P. Chithambaram utilized every minute of his service to mint money. Naturally, he possesses assets disproportionate to his known sources of income and this far exceeds the assets of Ms. Jayalalithaa.

One would say that the cases are not proved as in the case of Ms. Jayalalithaa.

But, the CBI has not proved any case against any member of the ruling class. The case against Ms. Jayalalithaa was proved because the state police and officers pursued it.

Evidently, the recent verdict against Jayalalithaa vitiates Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

The New Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, Mr. K. Palanisamai, on his Day-1 at work, cleared five key welfare measures. He allotted Re. 2400 crore for drought relief.

Further, he allotted Re.200 crore for the women to buy two wheelers. According to this scheme, Re. 20,000 each would be granted as subsidy to one lakh working women every year for the purchase of two wheelers of their own choice.

It is customary for the state government to buy wet grinders, TVs and other items in bulk for the people with an eye on commission.

Now, the new government has decided to give money to individuals through banks. The ministers are not likely to get commission. The traders will be benefitted and the economic activity will increase.

The money allotted for farmers also is to directly go into their bank accounts.

The departure from the customary style must be welcomed by one and all.

If all purchases are delegated to the entities in the district level, there will be a sea change in the economic activity in Tamil Nadu.

A reporter asked whether he would nationalize sand mining or not. The Chief Minister evaded the question. After watching this, some people said that he is only a contractor to the ruling class of Tamil Nadu to collect money from the manipulators.

However, a minister said that the licences for sand mining were granted by the Union government.

It is a sensitive matter. The media picked up courage to report it. The Union Government does not expect a minister to utter any word over it.

The United Front (UF) Government under Mr. H.D. Deve Gowda delegated the power to grant mining licences to the State Governments. Now, the Union Government and the State Governments vie with one another to alienate the public resources without a law in place.

The Prime Minister is not ready to restore all public resources. In fact, he handed over some public resources to some private parties in very bad faith.

What does he get in return?

Apparently, he is not after foreign banks. But he got his present position for virtually nothing. The cloth he wears is so fine in texture that some people in some place spend not less than Re. one lakh per day. This is nothing but corrupt money.

Therefore, the people would consider him as the biggest contractor in India.

This condition would continue until the people get political freedom and legal equality.

This is letter No.544

   The facts from 16 February 2017 to 22 February 2017 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 23-2-2017.

23-2-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

543:The Supreme Court of India: Breaking the spirit of the people?

543

The Supreme Court of India: Breaking the spirit of the people?

The Department of Income Tax (IT) carried out raids on the houses of an MLA in the Karnataka State and found documents and gold for about Re.150 crore on 13 February 2017. The MLA is a close friend of the Chief Minister of Karnataka.

 Justice Karnan of the Culcutta High Court had submitted a list of the corrupt judges to the Prime Minister of India. A seven-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India headed by Chief Justice JS. Khehar asked Justice Karnan to appear before it for contempt. To this, Justice Karnan said that the upper caste judges take law in their hands and misuse judicial power with the mala fide intention of getting rid of him. He rejected the order of the court on 13 February 2017.

A Supreme Court of India bench of Justices P.C. Ghose and Amitava Roy restored in toto the trial court conviction of Ms. Jayalalithaa (late), Ms. Sasikala, Ms. Ilavarasi and Mr. Sudhakaran. Trial court judge Michael D’Cunha had sentenced them to four years imprisonment.

The judgement is partly constitutional and partly unconstitutional.

          The people in villages had been using ribald language against the Supreme Court of India until this judgement. Now they say that the corrupt would be punished one day or other. They add that there is justice in one corner.

          The judgement, in its present form, would outwardly remain as a deterrent for corruption. Actually, it would encourage acts of corruption partly because the probability of getting such direct documentary evidences would be rare and partly because the court does not enforce freedom of expression..

The court will have to condone the jail term, if the people have freedom. As a consequence, a lot of good things would follow.

Now, it is shocking that the court failed to take into account some important points mentioned in this work.

The Union Government, on 15 February 2017, decided to merge five associate banks with the State Bank of India (SBI). Earlier, Union Finance Minister Mr. Arun Jaitely said that the SBI would be a global player, controlling 25 per cent of the Indian banking industry, after the merger.

The Union Government must envisage every state as another Japan, Hong Hong, Korea or Singapore. For this, every financial institution must be split and handed over to the state governments. Instead, the government wants to drain money from every state.

The associates of the SBI lend about 90 per cent of their deposits in their respective regions.

In contrast, the SBI lends about 10 per cent of its deposits in its various regions and siphons off the rest to Mumbai.

Further, in contrast to the associate banks, the SBI is not accessible to the small farmers.

Furthermore, every associate of the SBI has its own heritage value. This must be conserved.

The unconstitutional nature of the merger was mentioned earlier in this work. The government, at that time, retracted.

Now, the political leaders do not oppose the merger.

Why do you keep this work away from the eye of the people? If the court had asked this question to the media, the government would not have taken the above decision.

As it does not do this, the exploitation of the masses continues.

Thus, the court breaks the spirit of the people.

This is letter No.543

   The facts from 11 February 2017 to 15 February 2017 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 16-2-2017.

16-2-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.