182
A WICKED CAUSE
The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 24 July 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court, Indian Army, Indian Air Force, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai and Culcutta High Courts. It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com
Pratibha Devisingh Patil posted her assets- about Re. 2.5 crore- in a website on 25 July 2011.
A person possessing power gets money:
1. For doing duty as per rules. The beneficiaries might give money to him. For instance, Mr. Raja, former Telecom Minister, following the precedent set by Arun Shourie - did his duty. The beneficiaries might have given, say, Re.200 crore to someone. They might give another Re.2000 crore after, say, 10 years.
2. For bending the rules. If Raja had bent the precedent, the beneficiaries would have given Re.2000 crore and another Re.20,000 crore after 10 years.
3. For importing goods from other countries. Here, some boys got more than $30 billion from China for importing ships, telecom equipment and others. This is the reason why India allows the businessmen to sell “Made in China” products with “Made in India” stickers. Even Mr. A.K.Antony, Defence Minister of India, is unable to defend the interests of Indian industry in this matter.
4. For constitutional policy decisions. If a no objection certificate from Indian manufacturers is made a mandatory one for imports, the L&T Company might give some money to the present writer and the policy makers.
5. For unconstitutional policy decisions. For allowing the act of converting the public money into private assets, the beneficiaries give money. Some people –instead of money –accept responsible positions. Pratibha Devesingh Patil, and Dr.Manmohan Singh, Prime Minister of India, come under this category.
The Supreme Court, on 29 July 2011, stayed the iron ore mining operations in the Bellary region of Karnataka State. Had the mining been done by the POSCO or by the top eight industrial houses, the Supreme Court might have stood as a guarantee for the investors.
On 31 July 2011, Justice Santosh Hedge, a retired judge of the Supreme Court, said that Mr. L.K. Advani was like his father. The TV channels of under-ground moles gave great publicity to his confession.
Manmohan Singh, on 31 July 2011, said that the Prime Minister should not be brought under the Anti-corruption Act.
The Chief Information Commissioner acknowledged a letter sent to him.
The Chief Information Commissioner acknowledged a letter sent to him.
A bomb blast killed five people at Impal in Manipur on 1 August 2011.
The salary of Mr. Sunil Mittal would increase from the present Re.27.5 crore per annum to Re.70 crore per annum in 2011-2012.
Mittal could easily take Re.2000 crore as his yearly salary from his company. Re.70 crore is a very small amount. However, this amount is equivalent to the salaries of the all the learned judges of the Supreme Court and all the senior officers of the armed forces put together. The reason for his fortune is that he had secured the spectrum under the- first come –first served policy.
The Governor of Karnataka State, Mr. H.R. Bhardwaj, on 3 August 2011, granted permission to prosecute the outgoing Chief Minister, Mr. B.S. Yeddyurappa, under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for the alleged illegal mining of iron ore in the state. The basis of his action was a report submitted by Justice Santosh Hegde, Head of the Anti- corruption Unit of the Karnataka State.
Bhardwaj –during his stint as the Union Law Minister - had divested of the assets of Ramalinga Raju and sent him to jail with the help of Manmohan Singh. Later, he handed over the assets to a big industrial house. He is doing the same work now - with the same motive - with the help of Manmohan Singh and the Supreme Court. Whatever the small investors do is illegal. This is the plight of small entrepreneurs in India.
In this connection, it must be stated that Santosh Hegde –as a judge of the Supreme Court- had been successfully concealing this work from the eye of the people. Even now, he is not ready to disclose the existence of this work to the people. Anyone could gauge his real nature.
The Government of Kerala State, on 2 August 2011, leased –apparently for 100 years- 82 acre of land at Techno Park Trivandrum to the TCS of Mr. Tata to establish a Global Learning Academy.
The Kerala State is the beneficiary.
However, Tata would not hesitate to give 2 acre of land each to Mr. Oommen Chandy, Chief Minister of Kerala and his predecessor Mr. V.S. Achudhanandan or their representatives after, say,10 years for giving the above land under, say, 100 years lease rather than the usual 30 years.
The Government of Kerala State, on 3 August 2011, issued orders to evict Mr. Sreenijin, son-in-law of former Chief Justice of India K.G. Balakrishnan, from the 30 cent of encroached land.
If the Union Government had given Re.10,000 crore from the Provident Fund (PF) to Balakrishnan under one business principle or other, Sreenijin would have got 100 acre of land from the Government of Kerala to establish a Global Learning Centre of Excellence. As he did not get money like this, he was constrained to encroach 30 cent. Now, the law proceeds even against the son-in-law of Balakrishnan.
Mrs. Sonia Gandhi underwent an operation in the USA on 4 August 2011. None revealed her actual medical condition to the media. The media has been concealing many vital things. Now, Sonia Gandhi has chosen to ignore the media.
However, she had appointed a transition team -comprising A.K. Antony, Ragul Gandhi, Janardan Dwivedi and Ahmed Patel- to look after all matters related to the Congress Party before she left India.
The composition of the team shows that she had been disgusted with the rule of Manmohan Singh. Now the above team might ask him to quit office or reverse his unconstitutional decisions. This would infuriate the eight men. Naturally, the team is now between the, devil and the, deep blue sea.
A Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Aftab Alam and R.M. Lodha, on 5 August 2011, asked the Delhi Police to wind up its probe into vote-for-cash complaint in three weeks. It observed that middle men of the cheapest quality subverted the Parliamentary System.
The truth is that the Supreme Court subverted the Parliamentary System through its refusal to enforce freedom of expression.
A special court rejected the bail plea of Mr. Ramalinga Raju, former Chief of Satyam Company and six others.
Pratibha Devising Patil would say that the small entrepreneurs must be sent to jail in the interest of national development.
Pratibha Devisingh Patil, on 6 August 2011, said that the legal apparatus in the country is to uphold constitutional principles in the interest of national development and human dignity. She added that she was holding Indian judiciary in high esteem.
Her statement shows that she stands for the conversion of public assets into private assets, and for the denial of freedom of expression.
In this connection, it must be stated that a man accused of committing a murder cannot be convicted without giving him a chance to defend himself. For this he needs a lawyer. The latter receives money from the former –without the slightest compunction- to secure the best possible outcome.
Naturally, the morals of a lawyer are different from that of others.
Anyone going through this work would say that Pratibha Patil hacked to death the Constitution of India - in the heart of the Presidential Palace - by allowing Manmohan Singh to hand over Re.3 lakh crore to three boys. She did it at dead of night because the people were not aware of it.
Pratibha Patil would justify her action because she had been a practicing lawyer.
But all right thinking people think that it is neither natural nor common and some wicked cause must be at the bottom of it.
Pratibha Patil could make amends for it by:
1. Ordering the prosecution of Manmohan Singh.
2. Asking the Supreme Court to give its opinion.
3. By restraining the Government from converting public assets into private assets.
4. Enforcing freedom of expression.
The facts from 24 July 2011 to 7 August 2011are being submitted to Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India on 8 August 2011.
V.SABARIMUTHU
26-3 Thattankonam
Vellicode
Mulagumoodu P.O.
Kanyakumari District
PIN:629167
No comments:
Post a Comment