183
President Pratibha Devisingh Patil
The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 8 August 2011 . The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai and Culcutta High Courts. It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com
A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice H.L. Dattu, on 9 August 2011, issued notice to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on the petition by Mr. Sanjay Chandra of Unitech and Vinod Goenka of Reality seeking bail in the 2G Spectrum case. They were represented by senior counsels Ram Jethmalani and Mukul Rohtagi. The petitioners said that their freedom - granted under article 21 of the Constitution- was being violated.
Justice A.K. Ganguly and Justice G.S. Singhvi had been hearing the above case. Now, Justice A.K. Ganguly has been substituted by Justice H.L. Dattu. He might have expressed his reluctance to sit with Justice G.S.Singhvi. This is the first time the Supreme Court is encountering such a problem. This is the observation of the people sitting away from the Supreme Court.
A three - judge bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justices J.M. Panchal, Deepak Varma and B.S. Chauhan, on 9 August 2011, upheld the decision of the Chennai High Court on the Uniform System of Education Act (USEA) implemented by the DMK Government in the Tamil Nadu State. The court said that the Act was to impart quality education without any discrimination –economic, social or cultural. Chief Minister Jayalalitha agreed to implement the order.
Even after the implementation of the above Act, the standard of education will vary from English medium schools to Tamil medium schools. It will also continue to be a function of the social and economic condition of the students and the standard of the teachers.
Notwithstanding the above, the students will now start the race – at least theoretically - from the same line. The learned judges in the bench must be commended for this.
Now, if the Supreme Court wants, the distinction between the central syllabus and the state syllabus will be removed.
The Tamil Nadu pattern of education allows the students to study a third language in the Plus II level or collegiate level. This automatically solves the language problem.
It is pertinent to recall that the present writer –through the columns of The New Indian Express – had requested the Government to remove the distinction between the English medium schools, and the Tamil medium schools. Besides, the Government had been requested to teach English to all students from the LKG onwards. The New Indian Express –Madurai 1-2-2000 .
Whatever happened, Chief Minister Karunanidhi immediately said that he could not ignore Tamil. Disappointed by his words, the present writer left the matter there.
However, if the developments in the last ten years were based on that letter, one would say that Dr. M. Karunanidhi occasionally gives precedence to the views of the public over the views of his children. He alone could accept or deny this conclusion. However, in the context of Tamil Nadu, it is a great change indeed.
Now, the present writer is teaching General English to all students from Std -I to Std-VIII in the Tamil medium school at Vellicode purely on voluntary basis. Special care is taken to speak English only.
It is surprising to note that even the students of Std-I expect the present writer to talk in English. Even the children of coolies seem to understand English better than Tamil or Malayalam. They really wish to talk in English!
The Supreme Court, educationalists, psychologists and the experts in the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) could experimentally verify the correctness or otherwise of the above observation. If the inference is a positive one, a Uniform System of Education could be implemented all over India
The Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, on 9-8- 2011, approved two year extension to Mr. D. Subbarao, Governor, Reserve Bank of India
In contrast, Mr. TS Vijayan, Chairman, LIC, did not get extension presumably because he disclosed the amount invested by the LIC in shares. He had two more years left to his retirement.
The CBI, on 9 August 2011 , decided to seek the co-operation of the Maxis Company to probe the alleged forced sale of shares from the Aircel Company to it. In this matter, the people think that there exists a truce between the NDTV and the SUN TV. During such periods, the CBI – usually- does not act.
A five - judge Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia, Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan, Mukudan Sharma, Swatanter Kumar and Anil Dave, on 10 August 2011 , said that a state can deprive a person of his private property only for a public purpose. They said that any act of acquiring land for private purpose would undermine the rule of law. They wanted the foreign investors to know the fact that rule of law prevailed in India
The properties acquired for the National Textile Corporation (NTC) Mills have been sold to private parties in private interest. Those properties must be taken back or restored to the original owners to give a meaning to this judgment.
Mr. A.Raja, former Telecom Minister, told the CBI Special Judge, O.P. Saini, on 12 August 2011 , that he took oath to abide by the Constitution of India and not by the advice of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh or erstwhile Finance Minister Chithambaram.
In the above matter, it must be noted that Prime Minister Vajpayee asked Information Minister Arun Shourie to apportion the spectrum arbitrarily to his people. He did not allow anyone to lay down any rule or guideline. The so-called first-come –first - served policy did not enjoy the support of the Union Cabinet. Therefore, it was not the policy of the Government of India at all.
However, when Raja said that the spectrum had been apportioned like an ancestral property, the beneficiaries sent him to jail only to conserve their wealth.
In the above matter, the Supreme Court is cheating 1000 million people by allowing the real culprits to abscond.
The Directorate of Income Tax, on 12 August 2011 , found undisclosed assets of Re.30 crore each in the residences of actors Mammotty and Mohan Lal. One cannot buy 30 cent of land in a city for Re.30 crore. But the Directorate of Income Tax proclaims this raid as an achievement.
President Pratibha Patil - in her Independence Day eve address to the nation - said that corrective actions must be taken to restore the credibility of the constitutional positions. She added that corruption was spreading like cancer. She wanted the Parliament, judiciary and social organizations to solve this problem.
This is, apparently, the indirect reply of President Pratibha Patil to the last letter. However, media described this as a reply to the agitation of Anna Hazare.
The cancer of corruption, now, originates from the President of India. In fact, President Pratibha Patil could have created a new India
The Government, on 16 August 2011 , arrested Anna Hazare and sent him to Tihar jail. The Government did this to pre-empt him from undertaking an indefinite fast at Delhi
Immediately, a large number of people came to the street to ventilate their pent up anger against the Government. Apparently, they wanted something more than the Act.
Anna Hazare had asked everyone to come with a candle each. But many boys were keeping firelighters!
As a result, the Indian system – at least theoretically - collapsed on 16 August 2011 .
No one was injured. Delhi
However, the security agencies might have advised the Government to shift the Presidential Palace, Supreme Court and the Parliament House to a safe place outside Delhi
The Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, said that Anna Hazare problem would be solved soon. He knew that the people behind him were dummy leaders of the eight men responsible for running the nation.
Anna Hazare, on 17 August 2011, described his fast for a new Anti-corruption Act as the second freedom struggles.
It should not end as the second conspiracy to deny freedom of expression.
On 5 November 2004, a five judge Constitution Bench headed by Justice N.Santosh Hegde held that a Governor of a State could independently accord sanction for prosecution of a Minister in prevention of corruption cases “without the aid and advice” of the Council of Ministers. The Court observed that “if on facts and circumstances of a case, the Governor cannot act on his own discretion; there would be a complete breakdown of rule of law inasmuch as it would then be open for Governments to refuse sanction in spite of overwhelming material showing that prima facie case is made out”. The Bench included Justice S.N.Variava, Justice B.P.Singh, Justice H.K.Sema and Justice S.B.Sinha.
The present writer had then described the above judgment as a reward for his 42 letters.
If the Governor could act independently, the President of India could also act independently. Even children would understand it.
After writing such a clear judgment, Santosh Hegde gives legal opinion to Anna Hazare for a new act to prosecute the Prime Minister in corruption cases! Tomorrow, he would demand the prosecution of President Pratibha Patil to take away the credit from this writer.
The Lower House, on 18 August 2011, impeached Justice Soumitra Sen of Culcutta High Court for amassing wealth while he was functioning as a receiver of the High Court. All Chief Justices of India since 2001 besides G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly of the Supreme Court should be impeached for “fixing” judgments.
500 officers of the Income Tax (IT) Department raided the premises of the Saravana Jewellers, Chennai, on 18 August. There are hundreds of bigger jewelers in India. The people simply fail to understand the specialty of this merchant alone. The IT Department should have treated everyone equally.
The recipients of the PF money have converted Re.3 lakh crore into Re. 6 to 9 lakh crore. They keep Re.3 to 6 lakh crore as black money. The IT Department has no eye to see it.
On the same day, the CBI blocked the accounts of Mr. Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy. This is consistent with the theory that all small entrepreneurs would be sent to Jail.
Finance Minister Pranab Mukergee, on 19 August 2011, said that 5 to 10 per cent shares of the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) will be sold to garner Re.40,000 crore during 2011-2012.
If the Government could sell 5 percent shares, it could sell 100 percent shares. This was the principle followed to hand over Re.3 lakh crore rotting in the PF to private parties.
There are reports that the LIC would buy the shares of the private companies for Re.50,000 crore immediately.
The act of selling the shares of the PSUs against public money and the act of buying the shares of the private companies using public money is a vicious act of corruption. This happens because of the President of India.
President Pratibha Patil could have:
1. Issued orders for the prosecution of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh for the PF amount.
2. Restrained the Government from buying the shares of private companies using public money.
3. Restrained private parties from buying the shares of the PSUs using public money.
4. Prevented the Government from granting tax exemption to investments in the hands of private parties.
5. Asked the Government to restore public assets.
6. Enforced freedom of expression.
If noting worked, she could have asked the Supreme Court to give its opinion.
She has not done anything other than lending her support to corruption.
President of India cannot support acts of corruption and claim immunity from prosecution.
Therefore, President Pratibha Patil is liable for prosecution.
The facts from 8 August 2011 to 20 August 2011are being submitted to Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 21 August 2011.
The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India and the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force.
V.Sabarimuthu.
26-3 Thattankonam
Vellicode
Mulagumoodu P.O.
Kanyakumari District
No comments:
Post a Comment