Saturday, September 7, 2013

230. The Judges of the Supreme Court of India.

230


THE GENERAL WILL IS ALWAYS RIGHT


           The last mail was submitted to His Excellency the President of India on 28 August 2013. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force.   Later, it was sent through post to the President of India and the Chief Justice of India; and posted in the blog www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com

      A Supreme Court Bench comprising Justices G.S. Singhuvi and Gowda, on 29 August 2013, conducted an incamera hearing of the Niira Radia case. However, the Bench said that there would be no more incamera hearings in this case.

    Now the ND-TV uttered that there was a complaint against the Chief Justice of India. The details are not known.
    This is a warning. If he takes a decision to enforce freedom of expression, the media would treat him like former Chief Justice of India K.G. Balakrishnan.

       On 29 August 2013, the Supreme Court of India Bench comprising Justices R.M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph gave 15 days time to the Union Government to submit all documents sought by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in the coal allocation case.
       All miners- big and small- have the same attributes. The production and the remittances of some miners have not been inspected at all. Some miners resist inspection.  In these conditions, the above Bench must have considered the Letter No.229 and cancelled/suspended all mining licences. However, it did not review its decision.
    This shows that the Bench was not impartial in cancelling licences.
   Now, it does not tell the reason why it differentiates coal allocation from the rest.
     It does not even direct the Government to pass a legislation to treat coal allocations as a separate class.
        If the Supreme Court of India is ready to grant Freedom to the people to know this work today, the public opinion would force the judges to cancel all mining licences tomorrow.   
    Therefore, the difference between the legalities and the illegalities is Freedom.
   
        Mr.Tata, on 28 August 2013, said that there was a leadership deficit in India. He added that India had lost the confidence of the world.
     The Union Government had infused public assets into his companies. Yet, he talks like this!

    Union Minister Mr. Anand Sharma, on 28 August 2013, blamed the judiciary for the so called economic crisis of the nation. He added that the Vodofone tax deal, coal mining and the iron ore mining cases had led to loss in revenue.
    His statement is a correct one.
     While cancelling licences, the court should direct the Government to continue mining. This would disprove the claim of the miners that they alone could give employment. Incidentally, this would enable the government to gauge the actual profit of the miners.


    A report, on 30 August 2013, said that an MP, Mr. Vijay Darda, had requested Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to allocate some coal blocks to some firms.
     An MP gets more than what a union minister gets.    Therefore, the MPs stand by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

    Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on 30 August 2013, blamed the principal opposition party, the BJP, for the economic ills of the nation.
    This is true. The BJP has not uttered even a word regarding the Re.3 lakh crore in the Provident Fund (PF) or the associated black money in the last nine years. Now the people do not know anything about this money.
  Further, it is silent about the denial of freedom of expression. This is nothing but a betrayal of the trust reposed by the people.

        On 30 August 2013, the Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) sold $400 million for the recovery of the rupee.
   The RIL gets a dominant portion of the public assets. Therefore, it is duty bound to reduce the Current Account Deficit (CAD). The other private companies are similarly related.
 
     According to a report on 30 August 2013, three different committees had started verifying the accounts of the National Spot Exchange Limited (NSEL).
    Similar committees must be detailed to all entities like banks.

    On 3 September 2013, a Supreme Court Bench comprising Justices A.K. Patnaik and A.K. Sikri recalled an order of the Supreme Court that stipulated only sitting and retired judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court could head the State and Central Information Commissions (CIC). The Bench admitted that the court had committed a patent error.
      The Supreme Court is endowed with the power to annul its own judgements.    
    The court has committed grave errors in many judgements. It must come forward to rectify those errors also.
    A sitting judge had been appointed as the liquidator of the SUS bank a few years ago. He has not returned all the jewels pledged by the people.
     When India unified Goa, Portugal removed the jewels from the banks.  After some years, it returned all the jewels to the original owners. The judges are not doing even this.
    Therefore, the sitting judges should function as judges only.

         
      On 3 September 2013, an officer of the CBI, - handling the allocation of the valuable coal fields - Mr. K.R. Chaurasia - wanted to interrogate Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
  Complementing this, the BJP asked Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to depose before the CBI.
    The police have the power to question criminals. But a Prime Minister of India – theoretically- cannot be a criminal. Therefore, the police cannot question him.
    If he has committed any illegality, the Supreme Court could ask the police to make public the charges against him. Then he would have to resign.
    Now, the CBI does not reveal the whereabouts of the PF money.
   Further, it conceals this work from the eye of the people. It simply cheats the people though its secretiveness.
     Such an agency cannot question the Prime Minister and the Union Ministers.  
 

   Mr. Raghuram Rajan assumed charge as the 23rd Governor of Reserve Bank of India (RBI), on 4 September 2013.
  He promised transparency, bold reforms, quick actions and unpopular steps. He even used the word supervision –a word currently used by this writer.
   Apparently, he does not carry the paraphernalia of the manipulators; and he might act in good faith.
   The reason for the above conclusion is that he –to a question- said that “the equity must come from promoters”.
    The present writer, in Letter No.1 dated 1-6-2001 requested the government not to advance public money to buy shares. In fact, the consistent demand of this writer is that public money shall not be used to buy the shares of private companies. Now, the new Governor has echoed one of the most important views of this writer. He might have read this work again and again.
    This is a vindication of this work.    The people all over India have a right to know this.
   Notwithstanding everything, his stand on the PF money alone would reveal his real worth.

  The Parliament, on 4 September 2013, passed the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill. The salient features of the Bill are not very clear. Any provision to transmit any public savings into the hand of the private parties would be unconstitutional.

   A Supreme Court of India Bench comprising Justices A.K. Patnaik and S.J. Mukhopadhyay, on 4 September 2013, refused to review its order that disqualified convicted persons from contesting elections. It said that Parliament could enact a new law to annul the judgement.
   However, it agreed to review the verdict regarding the arrested persons contesting elections.
     If the court had committed an error, it must rectify it. The suggestion to enact a new law to defeat the purpose of a judgement is not a good idea.

   Former President of India A.P.J. Abdul Kalam called for a special session of Parliament to devise a plan for reviving the Indian economy. The Hindu reported this on 5 September 2013.
   As the President of India, he had denied freedom of expression. Thus, he had converted Indian political leaders into bad characters.


    The value of the Indian currency has been increasing in the last two days.
        In this connection, it must be firmly stated that the exchange rate of the Indian currency must be a reflection of its domestic value. Adverse effects could be managed by changes in duties or by direct cash subsidy.
    The exchange value of the rupee remained mostly stagnant for the last 10 years. As a result: 1. Some people transmitted a huge amount of money to foreign countries and 2. A number of Indian industries became extinct or sick.

    This is letter No.230. The Chief Justice of India knew that this must be news for the people. He must do his duty because “the General Will is always right”.

         The facts from 28 August 2013 to 6 September 2013 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India and the Chief Justice of India simultaneously on 7 September 2013.
       The same letter is being sent to the  Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force for necessary action.
V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam,Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167
Tamil Nadu State,
INDIA
Phone: 04651275520. Mobile: 9486214851
7  September 2013

For further reading visit:
1.www. vajpayee.blogspot.com
2.www. primeministervajpayee.blogspot.com
3.www.primeministerdevegowda.blogspot.com
4.www. storyofananthapadmanabhan.blogspot.com
6. www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com
Other blogs of this writer are:
1.  www. effectiveinorganicchemistry.blogspot.com

4.  www. mylife-sabarimuthu.blogspot.com

No comments: