231
A
BROAD INTERPRETATION
The Union Minister, Mr. Kamal Nath, on 7 September 2013, said that the Prime Minister
would be available for the Central Bureau
of Investigation (CBI). He added that the CBI, under law, could question
anybody.
This was the stand of the Union Government
before the receipt of the letter – No. 230 dated 7- 9- 2013 by the President of
India.
On 9 September 2013, Union Minister Manish Tewari said that all coal
ministers from 1993 must be summoned.
This was the stand of the government after
the receipt of the above letter.
Then the CBI simply retreated.
It did not point out any illegality
committed by Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh.
It must be noted that it did not see any
illegality in the transfer of Re. 3 lakh crore in the Provident Fund (PF) to private parties.
On
9 September 2013, the Indian companies asked the government to “shape up”.
Otherwise - they warned- that they would expand their business abroad and
deprive the Indian economy of their investments.
Thus they say that they bought assets
abroad not to make India rich but to deprive the Indian economy of their
investments.
In
many cases they got public assets through simple paper adjustments, and removed
a huge amount to foreign countries. Now they talk like this!
Advocate
Prasant Bhushan, appearing for former
Cabinet Secretary TSR Subramonium and
ex Naval Chief Admiral Nirmal Yadav requested
a Supreme Court Bench headed by Justice
H.L. Dattu to transfer the case to the Bench headed by Chief Justice Sathasivam. The reason cited was that a similar petition
filed by the CPM MP, Mr. Gurudas Gupta,
was pending before him.
On
hearing the above, Justice H.L.Dattu
rescued himself from the Bench.
He refused to pass any order.
Apparently, the manipulators wanted to
“fix” the course of the case.
It must be noted that one or two TV Channels
had levelled some charges against the present Chief Justice of India and the
latter chose not to seek any explanation.
Evidently, the manipulators “select” the
petitioners, advocates and the judges.
They keep the cases pending for years under gun point.
It must be again noted that the names of the
other judges in the Bench were not disclosed.
The secretiveness of the Supreme Court is conspicuous.
Punjab and Haryana High Court, on 13 September 2013, stayed the framing of
charges by the CBI against a retired
woman judge, Nirmal Yadav, in the
2008 cash at – judge’s door scandal. The parcel contained Re.15 lakh in cash.
This is how, say, the small miners corrupt
the system.
Fresh graduates are detailed to hand over
money to ex -MPs to MPs, retired IAS/ IPS officers to serving IAS/IPS officers
and prominent advocates to judges.
Besides, they take care of the top political
leaders – ruling and opposition simultaneously. The only condition is that they must be
prone to receive money indirectly.
Usually, a grandmother or a servant receives
the parcel.
At times, they drop the parcel at the door.
The Revenue Inspectors and Village
Administrative Officers do not get money like this. However, they are free to
collect, say, Re.1000/- or 2000/- from the truck drivers.
In contrast, the big miners deny Freedom by
controlling the media. Naturally, they select the leaders to rule India.
This is the reason why complaints for the
“Freedom” are useless.
No political leader would refute it.
A Supreme Court of India Bench headed by Chief Justice Sathasivam, on 13
September 2013, declared that the nomination papers of a candidate would stand
rejected if he does not disclose the details of his assets and criminal
antecedents.
The judges had declared their assets in a
website. When the present writer pointed out the shares of the judges in
different companies, they quickly deleted them.
The fact that they deleted their assets
does not seem to discourage them from expecting the very same rare quality from
the political leaders.
President of India appointed Justices Shiva Kirti Singh and C. Nagappan as the judges of the Supreme
Court of India.
With their appointment, the strength of
the judges in the Supreme Court went up to 30 as against the sanctioned
strength of 31.
There is no representation for Scheduled Caste after the retirement of
former Chief Justice of India K.G.
Balakrishnan.
The
sanctioned strength warrants six Scheduled
Caste judges.
The senior judges select the judges. As
there is no written examination, they could have easily located six persons
belonging to the Scheduled Caste and
then apportioned the rest among them. They did not do so.
The bias against them is one of the
reasons for the denial of Freedom. This has the effect of making all judgements
unconstitutional.
In his last judgement, Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan said that all natural assets must
be handled by the government as mentioned in Chapter 139 dated 10 May 2010. Is
it the reason for keeping them away?
Chief
Minister of Tamil Nadu Jayalalitha, on 16 September 2013, requested Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to give
Re.1500 crore for power projects. Finance Secretary had declined to approve it.
She should have approached the Supreme
Court for this money because it had allowed the government to hand over Re.3
lakh crore in the PF to private parties.
Cricket player Sreesanth, on 16 September 2013, told the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) that under the threat
of arrest of his close relatives, a statement was forcefully taken from him in
a manner directed by the police.
Instead of finding the veracity of his
allegation, the BCCI banned him for life.
“Slap a Case, Ruin a Life”. It happened in
the case of Mr. Nambi Narayanan of Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO).
Does the story repeat?
If
so, what is the reason for it?
The principal opposition party, the BJP,
declared Gujarat Chief Minister Mr. Narendra Modi as its prime
ministerial candidate. The manipulators were behind the selection and they started
giving great importance to him.
On 17 September 2013, investors of the
NSEL said that the entire money of the NSEL was with 24 borrowers.
The government had failed to monitor the functions
of the NSEL. Now, the CBI fails to confiscate the assets of the culprits.
Central Vigilance Commissioner Mr.Pradeep Kumar questioned the credibility of the CBI saying that
it had been dragging its feet on many cases.
Mr.
Pradeep Kumar received 230 letters from this writer alone. He has not
brought them to the notice of the people. Therefore, the people would question
his credibility.
A Supreme Court Bench comprising Justices A.K. Patnaik, S.S. Nijjar and Ranjan Gogoi, on 17 September 2013,
asked the Central Empowered Committee
(CEC) to submit a report about the mining violations by the big companies
in the Odisha and Chhattisgarh States.
The court formed the CEC in 2002.
Mr.
Pranab Mukherjee, His Excellency the President of India, forwarded the
letter No.228 dated 16-8-2013 of this writer to the Secretary to the Government
of India, Ministry of Defence. This writer received a copy on 17 September
2013.
For the first time he has responded to a
letter in one way or other.
This
shows that he does not set fire to the letters.
The former President had referred four
letters to the Supreme Court. The latter has not given any reply. Is it not a
mistake?
A Supreme Court Bench comprising Justices R. M. Lodha, Madan B. Lokur and
Kurian Joseph, on 17 September 2013,
asked the government the following two highly penetrative questions.
1.
Whether
the government monitored mining functions and
2.
What are the revenues from mining?
The above questions are consistent with this work. In fact, it is a
vindication of this work.
However, the people expect the Supreme Court to interpret the
Constitution of India broadly and not narrowly. The moment it understands a
case, it must cease to function like a trial court.
The
Hindu, on 18 September 2013, reported that all but the files of Reliance Power, Tata Sponge and Iron and
Rathi Steel were traced.
Any delay in the “coal case” would cause
the disappearance of the files from the CBI and the Supreme Court.
The Indian rupee is strengthening against the
US $. Mr. Reghuram Rajan, the New Governor of the Reserve Bank of India, must
explain the reason for this in simple terms. Otherwise, the people would think
that he acts in bad faith.
The New Indian Express, in an editorial
on 19 September 2013 said that the revised mining policy of the Government of Tamil
Nadu State would not “fatten the purses of private companies”. The paper said, “Jayalalitha promises to
ensure that a cartel of miners does not walk away with the fruits of natural
wealth.”
The
paper is a protagonist of privatization. Now it wants socialism in the mining
sector.
The mining in any part of India does not take
place without the knowledge of the Prime Minister and the Supreme Court of
India.
This is letter No. 231.
The
learned judges of the Supreme Court are erudite persons in law. When a common man
points out a legal point, they must be quick to realize its importance and take
remedial measures.
The facts from 7 September 2013 to 19 September 2013 are being submitted
to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court, Chief of Indian Army,
Chief of Indian Air Force and the Chief Vigilance Commission simultaneously on 20
September 2013 through email for necessary action.
V.
Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam,Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN:
629167
Tamil Nadu State,
INDIA
Phone: 04651275520. Mobile: 9486214851
20 September 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment