239
ABOUT
OBJECTIVE REPORTING
The last mail was submitted to His
Excellency the President of India on 27 November 2013. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and
Indian Air Force. Later, it was sent through post to the President of
India, Madras High Court and the Chief Justice of India; and posted in the blog
www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com
Madras High Court, on 10 December 2013, accepted a petition that
challenged the auction of property worth Re.1000 crore by a trust at
Kumbakonam. Earlier the Supreme Court of India had permitted the sale.
The trusts and societies must be precluded from
alienating their immovable assets. Further, no society shall remain under the
control of any man for more than, say, three years. This is to save them from
unscrupulous individuals. The Societies Act may be amended after due debate.
A Supreme Court bench comprising Justices G. S. Singhvi and Nagappan set a four month deadline to form 22 Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) courts across the country for
trying corruption cases.
Despite the recent illegal mining that
happened all over India, the Supreme Court is not ready to use police power to
detect any illegal remittances. Yet it is very curious to establish the CBI
courts!
Income
Tax raids on 17 premises of a leading soap manufacturer at Dindigul in the
Tamil Nadu State, on 19 December 2013, yielded around Re.2 crore in unaccounted
cash.
In the context of the present economic
scenario, it may be stated that the miners invest their black money in various
entities through their confidants. When the turnover of an entity is Re. one
lakh, they record it as Re. one crore and pay taxes accordingly. After ten
years, they attribute their wealth to their profits.
In
this way, they not only destroy the businesses of their rivals but also convert
their black money into white money.
Thus, barring exceptional cases, the things
that look fair are foul; and the things that look foul are fair.
The Supreme Court of India must be alert to
note this point as all raids in India originate in its mind.
A new political party called Aam Aadmi (Common Man) Party (AAP) -
established by a Mr. Aravind Kejriwal in
2012 - won 28 of the 70 available seats in the Delhi legislative assembly
elections of December 2013. On 28 December 2013, Mr. Kejriwal became the Chief Minister of Delhi.
Mr. Kejriwal had been a bureaucrat before
entering politics through the so-called Team Anna.
On 31 December 2013, Chief Minister
Kejriwal, announced 50 per cent subsidy to power bill. The subsidy would
directly reach Tata Power Delhi.
It may be recalled that the present writer
sent the letter No.1 dated 1-6-2001and the other early letters to many
political leaders and the important chief ministers. Mainly because of those
letters, the electricity boards and the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) in
many states escaped privatization.
But, as no letters were sent to Mrs. Sheila Dikshit, the then chief
minister of Delhi, the electricity board in Delhi went to Tata.
Actually, the privatization went down as an
anti-constitutional decision and very soon Mrs. Sheila Dikshit realized
isolation.
Citing various reasons, Tata raised the
power tariff and the people of Delhi resented privatization.
Mr.Kejriwal
did not restore the invaded property to pretend as an anti Tata man.
However, he decided to give money to Tata in
the pretext of ameliorating the sufferings of the people. It is a naked act of
corruption that ridicules the Constitution of India.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on 3 January
2014 - in an interview to the media- said that he actually wanted auctioning of
the minerals. He added that they were allocated against his will.
Thus, he says that he functioned like an
imbecile.
He knew that the Supreme Court of India was
responsible for the illegalities and that no action would be taken against an
old man like him for an act of corruption worth more than Re.500 lakh crore.
In the same interview, he said that he
would not opt for a third term and that history would be kind to him in judging
his actions as the Prime Minister of India.
He knew that “men must be either treated
generously or destroyed because they take revenge for slight injuries – for
heavy ones they cannot”.
He destroyed the Freedom of 1000 million
people without the slightest compunction for ten years and proved that politics
have no relation to morals.
However, the elite group that rules India hands over political power to
actors, lawyers, pilots, bureaucrats and even housewives. The condition is that
they must be positively willing to act immorally at the right times.
Had the members of the elite group not
found a bureaucrat like Dr. Manmohan Singh, they would have got any other man
to play his role.
In contrast, the political leaders – like
Mr. A.B. Vajpayee - consider the life of a private citizen preferable to that
of a prime minister at the expense of the ruin of the freedom of so many human
beings.
In fact, many natural political leaders
tend to club morality with politics; and the elite group abhors this.
As Dr. Manmohan Singh had been essentially
a bureaucrat with little contribution to Indian politics, history would treat
him as a man chosen by the elite group to lead India.
On 9 January 2014, the Union Government told
the Supreme Court that the coal allocations were illegal but done in good
faith.
As the allocations were done secretly, the
concept of good faith cannot be invoked.
On 9
January 2014, Chief Minister of Delhi Mr. Kejriwal said that he received 4000
complaints against public servants and that he would sit in front of the
Secretariat every Saturday to receive complaints.
The
newspapers and the TV channels all over India have been giving great publicity to
him and are endlessly discussing even his trivial words and deeds.
His words get greater coverage than those of
the President of India, Prime Minister of India, former prime ministers,
present and former union ministers, chief ministers and many other political
leaders.
His words eclipse the observations of the
Supreme Court of India and the people have forgotten the cases before it.
Even 5000 pages of this political work that
stands for the freedom and well being of the people is nothing in front of his
words.
The Supreme Court of India did not direct
the media to give all India coverage to him.
The Government of India also did not issue
any direction.
Evidently, the elite group issued the
direction.
The Supreme Court is afraid of the elite
group because even the private life of the judges is in its hands.
The Supreme Court, therefore, abdicates
its duty to enforce freedom of expression but permits this elite group to
enforce it to its own advantage..
Naturally, the Supreme Court leaves the
destiny of 1000 million people in its dangerous hands.
The Chief Justice of India says that there
are millions of views and that he cannot determine which view must get priority
over the others.
Therefore, he is not ready to ask even
the public sector TV channels to tell the reason for the importance given to
the words of Mr. Kejriwal over those of so many very important people.
Due to his inaction, the elite group has
chosen Mr. Kejriwal to oppose Mr.Narendra Modi only to impose the former on the
people as the next Prime Minister of India.
The elite group might reconcile with
Mr.Narendra Modi is a different matter.
This is not to say that the elite group or
the Chief Justice must project the present writer as the next Prime Minister of
India at all.
It is only to say that the elite group has
no right to impose its nominee as the next Prime Minister of India in the guise
of democracy and that the people have a right to know men and matters.
In other words, if the Supreme Court of India
has no right to impose its nominee as the next Prime Minister of India, the
elite group also has no right for the same.
For this, the Supreme Court India should
have asked the media to report men and matters in an objective manner based on
law or suitable guidelines. Then, the people would have felt the power of the
Supreme Court to enforce freedom of expression.
Now, the elite group hijacks 1000 million
people along with the Supreme Court of India.
Is not the above conclusion a correct one?
Is the removal of the present Chief Justice
India the need of the hour?
Where will the people go for remedy?
Will
the Supreme Court of India give an answer?
The
facts from 27 November 2013 to 10 January 2014 are being submitted to His
Excellency the President of India on 11 January 2014.
The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, High Courts
and the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force for necessary action.
V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam,Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN:
629167
Tamil Nadu State,
INDIA
11 January 2014
Phone: 04651275520. Mobile: 9486214851
No comments:
Post a Comment