278. PRIME MINISTER Mr. NARENDRA MODI: INDIA FIRST?

278

PRIME MINISTER Mr. NARENDRA MODI:

INDIA FIRST?

          Prime Minister of India Mr.Narendra Modi, on 28 August 2014, opened 1.5 crore bank accounts across the country. The objective is to ensure every poor family at least two bank accounts. Every account will have a debit card, Re. 1 lakh accident insurance cover, Re. 30,000 life insurance cover and an overdraft facility.

          The people welcomed the scheme.

          It is not clear whether it is primarily for the benefit of any private insurance company or not.

However, the government must see that the savings of the people are not siphoned off to other states. In order to ensure this, the suggestion given by this man must be implemented. This will be consistent with the “India First” theory of the prime minister.

The media, on 28 August 2014, said that Prime Minister Mr. Modi would travel to Japan on August 30, 2014. The important agenda, according to the reports, is the bullet train between Ahmedabad and Delhi.

 India could consider five other proposed corridors simultaneously without any financial assistance from any third parties. About $ 100 billion foreign exchange could be utilized in the next five years. This would bring down the cost.

If the government does not use the foreign exchange, some others would remove it.

Former Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh- due to corrupting influences- handed over the Re. 3.5 lakh crore in the Provident Fund to private parties. Unless otherwise denied, not less than one half of it was converted into foreign exchange. Naturally, there was no development during his period. He practised an “India Last” policy.

It may not be easy to create an ideal nation. However, Prime Minister Mr. Modi should consider the whole rather than some parts. This will be consistent with his “India First” theory.

This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 29 August 2014.

29-8-2014.

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode

Mulagumoodu PIN:629167

Email:sabarimuthu.vyakappan@gmail.com

277: PRIME MINISTER Mr. NARENDRA MODI: NOT ON HIS GUARD?

277

PRIME MINISTER Mr. NARENDRA MODI:

NOT ON HIS GUARD?

A grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, Mr. Gopalakrishna Gandhi, on 23 August 2014, said that the Indian leaders silence intellectuals across the country. He wanted the people to safeguard Freedom of Speech.

Thus he says that his grandfather enslaved Indians.

Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi must give an answer.

A retired High Court judge, Justice K. Chandru, on the same day, opined that the judiciary was acting against Freedom of Speech.

The Chief Justice of India must respond to his observation.

         

The Securities and the Exchange Board of India (SEBI) asked the Pearl Agrotech Corporation Limited (PACL) to refund about Re. 50,000 crore within three months to its 5.85 crore investors for violation of the Collective Investments Schemes (CIS) Regulation. The media reported this on 24 August 2014.

A class of people exploit the Mumbai Stock Exchange. The savings of the people reach their hand. The government illegally gives tax exemptions for such savings. The Supreme Court of India permits this. Naturally this class rules India.

A retired Supreme Court judge, Justice Katju, on 24 August 2014, said that the Chief Justice of India must be appointed based on merit, and not on seniority.

Now he, apparently, wants to get rid of some senior most judges.

A Supreme Court Bench comprising Chief Justice R.M. Lodha, Justice Madan B. Lokur and Justice Kurian Joseph, on 25 August 2014, cancelled all coal blocks allocated since 1993. The judgement said that common good  had suffered heavily.

Former Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh had granted 155 out of 218 coal blocks.

He arbitrarily granted not only coal blocks but also all other minerals to private parties. The Supreme Court should have cancelled all licences. It did not do so.

It could have asked the government to exploit all coal blocks directly. It did not do so.

Further, it said that a committee headed by a retired judge of the Supreme Court would suggest the options available to address the consequences of the verdict. 

This would lead to more and more manipulations.

The prime minister did not react to the above judgement.

He can use the Provident Fund or Pension Fund for the large scale exploitation of minerals. The Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) must have a huge amount of surplus money. He can use this money also.

Now, if the coal blocks do not go into the hand of the government, the judgement would do more harm than good to the nation.

A two judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justices Ranjana Prakash Desai and N.V. Ramana, on 27 August 2014, directed a real estate company, the DLF, to deposit Re.630 crore fine imposed on it by the Competition Commission of India (CCI).

The present man had given a suggestion to solve such problems.

Further, the DLF had secretly bought many public assets. The court did not take any action. Now it takes action!

A five judge Constitution Bench of Supreme Court comprising Chief Justice R.M. Ladha and Justices Dipak Misra, Madan B. Lokur, Kurian Joseph and S.A. Bobde refused to disqualify charge-sheeted ministers but said,

“1. Corruption is an enemy of the nation.

2. Prime Minister is the trustee of the constitution.

 3. He should not appoint persons with criminal background as ministers.

4. He should not appoint persons in conflict with law.

5. He should not appoint unwarranted persons”.

The Bench did not define “criminal background”, “persons in conflict with law” or “unwarranted persons”.

For this, Justice Depak Misra referred first president Mr. Rajendra Prasad that ‘many things cannot be written in the constitution, but are followed by convention’.

Above all, the judgement said that the prime minister must set an example of constitutional morality.

But the prime minister did not react to this judgement. He did not take any actions that are consistent with the judgement.

          Does the judgement refer to the present prime minister?

          One day he decried corruption as mentioned in the last letter. On the next day, the Supreme Court revealed that he had indirectly received money from Vedanta Company and others for election work.

          This gives the impression that he was not on his guard against the manipulators.

          This is letter No. 277.

This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 28 August 2014.

28-8-2014.

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode

Mulagumoodu PIN:629167

Email:sabarimuthu.vyakappan@gmail.com

          

276: Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi: A slave or a freeman?

276

PRIME MINISTER Mr. NARENDRA MODI:

A SLAVE OR A FREEMAN?

Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi, on 20 August 2014, said,  “Corruption is dangerous. It is spreading more dangerously than cancer. The people are no longer ready to live with it. Strong measures are needed to eradicate it. With the co-operation of the people, I will take tough measures to get rid of it”.  

The above words are sufficient to banish the beneficiaries of political corruption from Delhi. Curiously, this does not happen.

Prime Minister Mr. Modi, on the same day, said that development is the only solution to all problems.

He could have passed a resolution in the Union Cabinet to use public savings for public investments. He has not done so. Does he experience any difficulty in the Union Cabinet?

Now, he does not tell the whereabouts of the Provident Fund and the Pension Fund. Is this the way to develop India?

According to some reports, India will have exported 6 million tonne of iron ore and imported an equal amount through the same port or different ports in this year.

What is this? Is it not for under invoicing and over invoicing? Prime Minister Mr. Modi alone could give a reply.

Finance Minister Mr. Arun Jaitely, on 21 August 2014, demanded lower room rates for the growth of the tourism industry in India.

The public sector Indian Tourism Development Corporation (ITDC) had been functioning as a buffer to moderate the room rates. He illegally alienated them during his earlier stint in the Union Government. Now he wants lower room rates!

He must recover the hotels. Besides, he must build economy hotels exclusively for foreign tourists.

Prime Minister Mr. Modi, on 21 August 2014, said that balanced growth could take India to pinnacle.

The banks, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and the other financial institutions must use their money in the respective states. The state governments must determine the interest rates. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) must supervise everything.

A Supreme Court of India Bench headed by Chief Justice R.M. Lodha, on 21 August 2014, asked the Home Secretary to tell - within six weeks - the reason for asking the Governor of Utterakhand, Mr.Aziz Qureshi, to resign.

The Home Minister immediately denied the allegation. The matter might end here.

However, no officer shall obey the illegal orders of anyone. His important duty is to point out the illegality associated with the orders of the Union Ministers particularly when they are not backed by the Union Cabinet.

A Bench of the Supreme Court of India comprising Chief Justice R.M. Lodha, Justice Kurian Joseph and Justice Rihinton Nariman, on 22 August 2014, directed the government to take a stand on the Leader of Opposition (LoP).

Under the present scenario, the LoP could come in rotation.

The Supreme Court advocates –on-record Association (SCAoR), on 22 August 2014, challenged the National Judicial Appointment Bill, 2014 in the Supreme Court.

There is virtually no difference between the present Bill and the appointment by Collegiums of senior judges. Both are mechanical methods. The basic criterion for random picking is that less than ten manipulators should have power and the rest are deprived of it.

A Supreme Court of India Bench headed by Chief Justice R.M. Lodha, on 22 August 2014, asked the Election Commission of India and the BJP to explain the donation received from the Vedanta Company. The court did not reveal the names of other judges in the Bench.

Vedanta had conquered some Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) in violation of the guidelines. Despite hundreds of letters, the Supreme Court does not question the government because the property of Vedanta falls above a certain maximum.

If Prime Minister Mr. Modi had received money from Vedanta or any other company, he is not a freeman but a slave only. He cannot recover the conquered assets.

The manipulators now want to pin him down is a different matter.  

This is letter No. 276.

This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 23 August 2014.

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode

Mulagumoodu PIN:629167

Email:sabarimuthu.vyakappan@gmail.com

275: THE DISSOLUTION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

275

THE DISSOLUTION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

          The Lower House of Parliament, on 13 August 2014, unanimously passed the National Judicial Appointment Commission Bill (NJAC), 2014. The Bill wrongly permits arbitrary selection of judges for the High Courts and the Supreme Court of India.

          On the next say, the Upper House passed the Bill by a voice vote. There was no dissent.

However, there was a small amendment.

          Accordingly, the two jurists mentioned in the Bill were substituted by two eminent persons. Another provision stipulated that one of the eminent persons must be from the Scheduled Castes (SCs)/ Scheduled Tribes (STs) or Other Backward Communities (OBC).

          Thus the NJCA comprises the Chief Justice of India, two senior most judges of the Supreme Court of India, Union Law Minister and two eminent persons.

          The NJCA, if it wants to act in good faith, can ask the aspirants to appear for an interview after clearing an eligibility test. The Parliament can also amend the law for the public good.

          In this connection, it must be stated that the nation could arbitrarily appoint engineers, doctors and even pilots but not judges. The coal case shows that the inducted judges do not know the elements of law.

          The rare unanimity of the Parliament must be noticed. This shows that all opposition parties are ready to send Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi to Gujarat. They are under the command of an alien force.

           

The Indian business houses, on the same day, announced that they would invest Re. $100 billion (about 6 lakh crore) in the next three years. They expressed their faith in the Indian economy. They said that the new government had reinforced the sentiment. They added that a portion would go for their overseas operations as they had harboured global ambitions.

The Hindu said Tata ($ 35 billion), Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) ($30 billion) and the JSW Steel ($22 billion) would spend over $87 billion.

The announcement of the business houses is linked to many factors. The most important of them must be the story of the two boys mentioned in the last letter.

However, the business houses must part with all their mining operations in the supreme national interest. This would change the living conditions of the people working in the mines. Now, they live under subhuman conditions.

Further, they must also allow the government to use public savings for public investments.

On 13 August 2014, Mr. Uday Umesh Lalit, an advocate, was arbitrarily appointed as the judge of the Supreme Court of India. This shows that the Chief Justice of India is free to pick up anyone as his heir apparent in the Supreme Court.

Mr. Lalit did not clear any screening test to claim the present post. His educational qualification is also not known.

Further, the letter No. 271 vetoed his elevation. The Supreme Court could have defied it only after showing that letter to the people. The present letter gives a chance to drop him.

In his Independence Day eve address to the nation, President of India Mr. Pranab Mukherjee said that stagnant minds are road blocks to growth.

The ultra quick action he takes to hand over the letters to the prime minister impels this man to persist with this work. However, does he think that this work is a danger to the whole nation? Many beneficiaries of political corruption do believe that all works of this kind ought to be prohibited for the progress of the nation.

On 15 August 2014, Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi paid homage to Mahatma Gandhi at Raj Ghat in New Delhi. It must be noted that Mahatma Gandhi had enslaved Indians.

Prime Minister Mr. Modi, in his Independence Day speech, on 15 August 2014, among many other things,  said,

“1. I greet the under privileged.

2. I come from a poor family and I want the poor to get dignity.

3. I offer my respect to all former prime ministers.

4. The politicians did not build India but the people did.

5. The Planning Commission will be scrapped.
6. I have seen some power centres at Delhi.

7. 7.5 crore poor people would be given a debit card each with an insurance cover of Re. 1,00,000/-

8. The global firms must make India an export hub”.

The people would not have fathomed his speech.

He  gave a hint to change the status quo. However, the future alone would tell whether the reasoning is correct or not.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) raided the offices of the Saradha Group under the direction from Prime Minister Mr. Modi.

Thus, the media for the first time attributed the raids of the CBI to the prime minister. It appears as a panic reporting.

In this connection, it must be pointed out that a suggestion had been given to pre-empt many raids.

The Parliament, on 13 August 2014, allowed women’s quota Bill to lapse. This is consistent with the prediction of this man.

Prime Minister Mr. Modi, on 17 August 2014, said that the states will be empowered to form their own export promotion councils. He added that the states could compete with one another for exports.

This is consistent with this work. Just like the private companies, the state governments could be allowed to keep separate foreign exchange accounts. The present man had given this suggestion.

According to some reports, there is no representation to the SCs/STs in the Supreme Court of India since the retirement of Justice K.G. Balakrishnan in 2010.

If the above report is a correct one, the learned judges of the Supreme Court of India have dissolved the Constitution of India. Now they sit at the Supreme Court based on the strength of the media and not on the strength of the Constitution of India.

This is letter No.275.

This letter is being set to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force on 20 August 2014.

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode,

Mulagumoodu P.O. India. PIN:629167

Email: sabarimuthu.vyakappan@gmail.com

274: PRIME MINISTER Mr. NARENDRA MODI: A TYRANT?

274

PRIME MINISTER Mr. NARENDRA MODI: A TYRANT?

          The Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC)  acknowledged the receipt of the last letter although it was an automated one.

           The New Indian Express, on 11 August 2014, reported the plight of sandal wood smugglers as its front page headline news. According to the report, Special Task Force (STF) personnel in the Andra Pradesh state had gunned down 8 boys in 69 days for cutting trees from the reserve forests. A photograph showed the dead bodies of two boys gunned down by the STF.

          Overtaken by grief, their parents – despite voting for Mr. Narendra Modi – would die very soon. There was no one to condole with them.

Even the National Human Rights Commission is silent.

          A post card addressed to the Supreme Court of India had resulted in the “Bihar Blinding Case”. Here, it is blind to the killings.

The reserve forests are very important. The smugglers should not destroy them. However, even wild animals are captured after tranquilization.

          At the same time, the government keeps a class happy in various ways. It simply allows them to invade the minerals and keep the proceeds in foreign countries. It affects the income of the government and the employment opportunities of the boys.

          The paper must be congratulated for the above news item.

          However, it did not reveal the total number of boys killed or captured during the rule of Dr. Manmohan Singh. It did not report the so-called encounters as and when they happened.

          Did not the paper mention the 69 days   to depict Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a tyrant?

          The government must ask the paper to publish its reply.

         

          A Supreme Court of India Bench comprising Chief Justice of India R. M. Lodha, Justice Kurian Joseph and Justice Nariman, on 11 August 2014, rejected a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on the elevation of a judge. The Chief Justice said, “If there is a campaign to defame judiciary in the eye of public, you are doing a great damage to democracy. Don’t shake people’s confidence in judiciary. For God’s sake don’t try to defame judiciary. As an institution, the collegium had its limitations in selecting persons. After all, judges too come from the same society. But to carry on a campaign just because of allegations against one or two judges is unfair”.

          The Supreme Court of India would agree that the inducted judges impair the reason of the people.

          If the Constitution of India allows this, it is liable to be dissolved.

          The chief of the public sector TV Channel, Mr.Javaha Sircar, on 11 August 2014, said that he had no freedom to telecast news and views.

          Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi cannot but now agree that India is not a democracy.

          Justice Kurian Joseph, a sitting judge of the Supreme Court of India, on 11 August 2014, said that the judges depend on the Constitution of India and not the Chief Justice of India for courage.

          The judges did not give their answers to hundreds of letters from the President of India. Is it not injustice? But, they know that injustice, when not detected, is justice. Therefore, they depend solely on the media for courage. The moment they report this work, the public opinion will force them to quit the Supreme Court of India.

          The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), on 11 August 2014, transferred Re.52,679 crore to the union government. It was its surplus profit. Therefore, the government need not alienate any public assets in the pretext of fiscal deficit.

         

          The Union Law Minister, Mr.Ravi Sankar Prasad, moved the Judicial Appointment Commission Bill, 2014, in the Lower House of Parliament on 11 August 2014. It seeks to legalize the induction of individuals as judges of High Courts and the Supreme Court of India.

          The present development shows that some union ministers want the prime minister to quit office. Or, it is fast becoming a question of the survival of one or two ministers.

          However, it must be stated that the mark sheet of an individual is not the sole index of his intelligence. But, it is the method of selecting the public servants. Even the judges of the lower courts are selected through an eligibility test. As it provides for reservation, the Scheduled Castes (SCs) and the Other Backward Communities (OBC) would get a chance to enter High Courts by virtue of their seniority.

          In fact, Nachiappan Committee pointed out that there were only 20 SCs out of 450 High Court judges.

          If the Prime Minister of India wants committed judges to protect his empire or for public welfare, he could select them from the High Court judges. But, if he wants arbitrary induction of judges even in the High Courts, the judges so selected would act arbitrarily. A tyrannical form of government alone would opt for it.

This is letter No.274.

          The people are anticipating some good announcements from Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi to change the status quo. If anything had gone wrong, he should not hesitate to make some corrections.

This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Chief Justice of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC), chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force on 13 August 2014.

13-8-2014.

V. Sabarimuthu

26- Thattamkonam, Vellicode,

Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN: 629167

Email. Sabarimuthu.vyakappan@gmail.com

Mobile:9486214851

273. PRIME MINISTER Mr. NARENDRA MODI: A BRAVE MAN?

273

PRIME MINISTER Mr. NARENDRA MODI: A BRAVE MAN?

          Parliamentary Affairs Minister Mr. M. Venkaiah Naidu said that the Judges Appointment Bill was not listed.

          The Union Cabinet had cleared the Bill.

The last letter was sent on 8 August 2014 morning. Mr. Naidu said the above on the same day evening. What happened in between is not known.

          Apparently, the government welcomed the letter. Instantly, it decided not to use its advantages over the weak to pass the Bill. It must be considered as a bold decision taken in the interest of the nation.

          Now it can pass a Bill to conduct an Indian Judicial Service (IJS) examination just like the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) examination. It is consistent with the equality present in the Constitution of India.

          All inductions from the bar are out and out unconstitutional because no human being can find out the differences between thousands of jurists.

The US Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel called on Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi at New Delhi on 8 August 2014.

          During the discussion with his delegation, Defence Minister Mr.Arun Jaitely pointed out the 49 percent Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in defence production and wanted the USA to collaborate with the Indian private companies.

          This shows that the government wants to make a class of people happy at the expense of 1000 million people. It is pursuing the matter in bad faith because the top Indian companies take away the Freedom of the people.

          Prime Minister Mr. Modi, on 9 August 2014, said, “I welcome the criticism that comes our way. But I accept this challenge and I assure you that we will meet people’s expectations”.

          It is a brave statement.

          This work represents the General Will of the nation. It contains over 5000 pages. No prime minister can go through this. But he can ask the officials to tell the suggestions given in this work to enforce Freedom of Expression (FoE).

          Now the people praise some things that are being said or done. They blame certain other things. If there is Freedom, their notions of good and evil will change. Even the prime minister, with all his popularity, will not stand firm against the overwhelming flood of popular opinion.

          The people will compel him to use public savings for public investments. They will force him to restore the public assets invaded by former Prime Minister Mr. A.B. Vajpayee. Other things are similarly related. 

          Evidently, it requires courage to accept the challenge.

Even otherwise, the criticism has no meaning if the people do not know it.

This is letter No.273.

Former Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh gave Re. 3.5 lakh crore in the Provident Fund (PF) to private parties. The amount is so big that the present writer cannot even count the zeros in this amount.

Did the beneficiaries buy gold? Did they utilize it to buy assets abroad? Prime Minister Mr. Modi must reveal it, lest someone would erect 300 metre tall statue to him.

This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Chief Justice of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Chiefs of the Indian Army and the Indian Air Force on 10 August 2014. It is posted in theblog:www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode,

Mulagumoodu P.O: PIN:629167

India.

Email:sabarimuthu.vyakappan@gmail.com

272: PRIME MINISTER Mr. NARENDRA MODI: DOES HE REPRESENT THE WHOLE?

272

PRIME MINISTER Mr. NARENDRA MODI: DOES HE REPRESENT THE WHOLE?

The Union Cabinet, on 6 August 2014, approved a proposal to raise the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) ceiling in the defence sector to 49 percent from the present 26 percent.

The government could have allowed 100 percent FDI for import substitution items.

The present decision shows that the government represents a class of people.

Suppressing this work and the Sudarshan Nachiappan Committee report on judicial reform, the new Union Government prepared a ‘Bill on Judges Appointment to the High Courts and the Supreme Court of India’.

The government could have passed the Bill secretly. It did not do so. Perhaps at the instance of Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi, the government leaked it on 7 August 2014.

According to the Bill, any objection against any person by any two of the six panellists would be treated as a veto. The panel comprises Chief Justice of India, two senior judges of the Supreme Court of India, Union Law Minister and two eminent jurists. The jurists will be appointed by a panel comprising Chief Justice of India, Prime Minister of India and the Leader of the Opposition.

The present Bill would ensure the selection of hardened criminals capable of denying Freedom.

If there is Freedom, the people would reject the Bill. Even otherwise, it is unconstitutional.

Any aspirant must apply for the post, sit for an examination and start his career – at least-as a District Judge. Judges selected in this manner will represent the whole and not a class.

This is letter No. 272.

 Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi is a mass leader. He need not join in the policies of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel. However, if the present condition continues, the nation will erect a 250 metre tall statue for former Prime Minister of India Mr. A.B. Vajpayee. This is because he – following the footsteps of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel –converted public assets into private assets using public money.

This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Chief Justice of India, chiefs of Indian Army and the Indian Air Force and the Chief Vigilance Commissioner on 8 August 2014.

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Thattamkonam , Vellicode,

Mulagumoodu P.O. 629167

Mobile: 9486214851

Email:sabarimuthu.vyakappan@gmail.com

271. PRIME MINISTER Mr. NARENDRA MODI - LOOKING AT ALL DIRECTIONS?

271

PRIME MINISTER Mr. NARENDRA MODI – LOOKING AT ALL DIRECTIONS?

Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi, on 29 July 2014, said that the farmers must be empowered to produce more and earn more. However, he did not tell the way to achieve it.

US Secretary of State Mr. John Kerry arrived at New Delhi, on 30 July 2014, to co-chair Indo-US strategic Dialogue. He said that the USA and India should be indispensable partners for the 21st century.

He called on Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi. They set an “ambitious new agenda” to chart a new course in the bilateral ties.

The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) said that they agreed to prepare for concrete outcome during the summit meeting between Prime Minister Mr. Modi and President Obama in September 2014 at Washington.

Later, Mr. John Kerry said that he was excited about the demands of Mr. Modi for the people of India.

Apparently,  Prime Minister Mr. Modi looks at all directions. He might have demanded stealth fighter jets to strengthen the Indian Air Force (IAF). The future alone would prove or disprove this conclusion.

The media did not report the salient features of John Kerry – Narendra Modi talks. They simply underplayed the meeting.

In this connection, it must be noted that commission agents honeycomb Delhi. In every defense deal someone in some place gets huge commissions. This had been happening with the knowledge of the prime ministers. The Bofors deal is an example. The probability of this is minimum with the USA. Therefore, the media damage defense deals with that country.

Supreme Court judge Justice Anil R. Dave, on 2 August 2014, said that had he been a dictator,  he would have introduced Gita in Class I.

Gita- as mentioned in Chapter 112- says that “Freedom is Heaven”.

The “duty” of the learned judge of the Supreme Court is the maintenance of Freedom. He has not taken any “step” for this. In fact, he considers “big things as small things and small things as big things”. What does he do in the Supreme Court with all his knowledge of Gita?

          Prime Minister of India Mr. Modi paid a visit to Nepal on 3 August 2014. Addressing the Constituent Assembly of Nepal he said that India would not interfere in the internal affairs of Nepal. He announced $1 billion aid package to Nepal.

          The leader of the opposition in the Nepalese Parliament said that Mr. Modi won the hearts and minds of the people of Nepal with his speech.

          A Supreme Court of India appointed committee found that the mining sector had been generating a huge amount of black money. The media reported this, in an insignificant way, on 3 August 2014.

          Unlike all other sectors, mining sector has a few players only. Therefore, the Supreme Court could have taken appropriate remedial measures.

          A defense equipment firm in England, on 3 August 2014, reported the existence of commission in an Indian defense deal. The details were not reported.

          There was an off campus interview at Chennai for recruiting 2200 engineers.. About 50,000 thousand struggled to attend. This must open the eye of everyone.

          The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) special public prosecutor, Mr.Uday U. Lalit, on 4 August 2014, said that the CBI, under Director Ranjit Sinha, derailed a case against Reliance Telecom of the Anil Ambani group in the 2G case.

          He must have submitted this before the special CBI court or  Supreme Court of India. He did not do so. Therefore, the  government might cancel the clearance given for his elevation as the judge of the Supreme Court of India. Or the Supreme Court would have to rescind its decision.

This is letter No.271.

          At one time, it seems that the new Prime Minister of India is looking at all directions. At another time, it appears that he is very reluctant to put right the public wrongs. He is not ready to restore the public assets that went against public money. He is silent about the public savings – Provident Fund and Pension Fund.

          Thus the prime ministers, one after another, help convert public assets into private assets. Therefore, they might get taller statues than the one proposed for Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.

          This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Chief Justice of India, chiefs of the Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, Chief Vigilance Commissioner and posted in the blog: www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 6 August 2014.

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Thattankonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN:629167

INDIA

6 August 2014.