274
PRIME
MINISTER Mr. NARENDRA MODI: A TYRANT?
The Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) acknowledged the receipt of the last letter
although it was an automated one.
The New
Indian Express, on 11 August 2014, reported the plight of sandal wood
smugglers as its front page headline news. According to the report, Special Task Force (STF) personnel in
the Andra Pradesh state had gunned
down 8 boys in 69 days for cutting trees from the reserve forests. A photograph
showed the dead bodies of two boys gunned down by the STF.
Overtaken
by grief, their parents – despite voting for Mr. Narendra Modi – would die very soon. There was no one to
condole with them.
Even
the National Human Rights Commission
is silent.
A
post card addressed to the Supreme Court of India had resulted in the “Bihar Blinding Case”. Here, it is blind
to the killings.
The
reserve forests are very important. The smugglers should not destroy them.
However, even wild animals are captured after tranquilization.
At
the same time, the government keeps a class happy in various ways. It simply
allows them to invade the minerals and keep the proceeds in foreign countries.
It affects the income of the government and the employment opportunities of the
boys.
The
paper must be congratulated for the above news item.
However,
it did not reveal the total number of boys killed or captured during the rule
of Dr. Manmohan Singh. It did not
report the so-called encounters as and when they happened.
Did
not the paper mention the 69 days to
depict Prime Minister Narendra Modi as
a tyrant?
The
government must ask the paper to publish its reply.
A
Supreme Court of India Bench comprising Chief
Justice of India R. M. Lodha, Justice Kurian Joseph and Justice Nariman, on 11 August 2014, rejected a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on the
elevation of a judge. The Chief Justice said, “If there is a campaign to defame judiciary in the eye of public, you
are doing a great damage to democracy. Don’t shake people’s confidence in
judiciary. For God’s sake don’t try to defame judiciary. As an institution, the
collegium had its limitations in selecting persons. After all, judges too come
from the same society. But to carry on a campaign just because of allegations
against one or two judges is unfair”.
The
Supreme Court of India would agree that the inducted judges impair the reason
of the people.
If
the Constitution of India allows this, it is liable to be dissolved.
The
chief of the public sector TV Channel, Mr.Javaha
Sircar, on 11 August 2014, said that he had no freedom to telecast news and
views.
Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi cannot
but now agree that India is not a democracy.
Justice Kurian Joseph, a sitting judge
of the Supreme Court of India, on 11 August 2014, said that the judges depend
on the Constitution of India and not the Chief Justice of India for courage.
The
judges did not give their answers to hundreds of letters from the President of
India. Is it not injustice? But, they know that injustice, when not detected,
is justice. Therefore, they depend solely on the media for courage. The moment
they report this work, the public opinion will force them to quit the
Supreme Court of India.
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), on 11
August 2014, transferred Re.52,679 crore to the union government. It was its
surplus profit. Therefore, the government need not alienate any public assets
in the pretext of fiscal deficit.
The
Union Law Minister, Mr.Ravi Sankar Prasad,
moved the Judicial Appointment Commission
Bill, 2014, in the Lower House of Parliament on 11 August 2014. It seeks to
legalize the induction of individuals as judges of High Courts and the Supreme
Court of India.
The
present development shows that some union ministers want the prime minister to
quit office. Or, it is fast becoming a question of the survival of one or two
ministers.
However,
it must be stated that the mark sheet of an individual is not the sole index of
his intelligence. But, it is the method of selecting the public servants. Even
the judges of the lower courts are selected through an eligibility test. As it
provides for reservation, the Scheduled Castes (SCs) and the Other Backward Communities (OBC) would
get a chance to enter High Courts by virtue of their seniority.
In
fact, Nachiappan Committee pointed
out that there were only 20 SCs out of 450 High Court judges.
If
the Prime Minister of India wants committed judges to protect his empire or for
public welfare, he could select them from the High Court judges. But, if he wants
arbitrary induction of judges even in the High Courts, the judges so selected
would act arbitrarily. A tyrannical form of government alone would opt for it.
This is letter No.274.
The
people are anticipating some good announcements from Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi to change the status quo. If anything had gone wrong, he should
not hesitate to make some corrections.
This
letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime
Minister of India, Chief Justice of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC),
chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force on 13 August 2014.
13-8-2014.
V.
Sabarimuthu
26-
Thattamkonam, Vellicode,
Mulagumoodu
P.O. PIN: 629167
Mobile:9486214851
No comments:
Post a Comment