277: PRIME MINISTER Mr. NARENDRA MODI: NOT ON HIS GUARD?

277

PRIME MINISTER Mr. NARENDRA MODI:

NOT ON HIS GUARD?

A grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, Mr. Gopalakrishna Gandhi, on 23 August 2014, said that the Indian leaders silence intellectuals across the country. He wanted the people to safeguard Freedom of Speech.

Thus he says that his grandfather enslaved Indians.

Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi must give an answer.

A retired High Court judge, Justice K. Chandru, on the same day, opined that the judiciary was acting against Freedom of Speech.

The Chief Justice of India must respond to his observation.

         

The Securities and the Exchange Board of India (SEBI) asked the Pearl Agrotech Corporation Limited (PACL) to refund about Re. 50,000 crore within three months to its 5.85 crore investors for violation of the Collective Investments Schemes (CIS) Regulation. The media reported this on 24 August 2014.

A class of people exploit the Mumbai Stock Exchange. The savings of the people reach their hand. The government illegally gives tax exemptions for such savings. The Supreme Court of India permits this. Naturally this class rules India.

A retired Supreme Court judge, Justice Katju, on 24 August 2014, said that the Chief Justice of India must be appointed based on merit, and not on seniority.

Now he, apparently, wants to get rid of some senior most judges.

A Supreme Court Bench comprising Chief Justice R.M. Lodha, Justice Madan B. Lokur and Justice Kurian Joseph, on 25 August 2014, cancelled all coal blocks allocated since 1993. The judgement said that common good  had suffered heavily.

Former Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh had granted 155 out of 218 coal blocks.

He arbitrarily granted not only coal blocks but also all other minerals to private parties. The Supreme Court should have cancelled all licences. It did not do so.

It could have asked the government to exploit all coal blocks directly. It did not do so.

Further, it said that a committee headed by a retired judge of the Supreme Court would suggest the options available to address the consequences of the verdict. 

This would lead to more and more manipulations.

The prime minister did not react to the above judgement.

He can use the Provident Fund or Pension Fund for the large scale exploitation of minerals. The Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) must have a huge amount of surplus money. He can use this money also.

Now, if the coal blocks do not go into the hand of the government, the judgement would do more harm than good to the nation.

A two judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justices Ranjana Prakash Desai and N.V. Ramana, on 27 August 2014, directed a real estate company, the DLF, to deposit Re.630 crore fine imposed on it by the Competition Commission of India (CCI).

The present man had given a suggestion to solve such problems.

Further, the DLF had secretly bought many public assets. The court did not take any action. Now it takes action!

A five judge Constitution Bench of Supreme Court comprising Chief Justice R.M. Ladha and Justices Dipak Misra, Madan B. Lokur, Kurian Joseph and S.A. Bobde refused to disqualify charge-sheeted ministers but said,

“1. Corruption is an enemy of the nation.

2. Prime Minister is the trustee of the constitution.

 3. He should not appoint persons with criminal background as ministers.

4. He should not appoint persons in conflict with law.

5. He should not appoint unwarranted persons”.

The Bench did not define “criminal background”, “persons in conflict with law” or “unwarranted persons”.

For this, Justice Depak Misra referred first president Mr. Rajendra Prasad that ‘many things cannot be written in the constitution, but are followed by convention’.

Above all, the judgement said that the prime minister must set an example of constitutional morality.

But the prime minister did not react to this judgement. He did not take any actions that are consistent with the judgement.

          Does the judgement refer to the present prime minister?

          One day he decried corruption as mentioned in the last letter. On the next day, the Supreme Court revealed that he had indirectly received money from Vedanta Company and others for election work.

          This gives the impression that he was not on his guard against the manipulators.

          This is letter No. 277.

This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 28 August 2014.

28-8-2014.

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode

Mulagumoodu PIN:629167

Email:sabarimuthu.vyakappan@gmail.com