370. THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: OBLIGATORY RESPONSE AGAINST INJUSTICE?

370

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:

OBLIGATORY RESPONSE AGAINST INJUSTICE?

          The media, on 30 April 2015, said that the coal block auction would yield about Re.four lakh crore to seven state governments.

          These are deceptive reports.

The Supreme Court of India enjoys such reports because they dim the eye of the people.

          Defence Minister Mr. Manohar Parikar, on 4 May 2015, said that the negotiations for the Rafale fighter jets would start immediately.

          Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi had, in bad faith, signed an agreement to buy the jets. He did not opt for a better one because of the commission factor. He can do anything because the allegations levelled against him will not reach the mind of the people. The negotiations are a formality.

         

          Justice Kurian Joseph, a sitting judge of the Supreme Court of India, said that the judicial activism was the obligatory response of the judges against injustice. He cited the 2G and the coal block allocation judgements in this regard. He pointed out the tremendous impact of the judgements on the public exchequer.

          The Hindu reported his statement on 4 May 2015.

          The BJP Government under Mr. A.B.Vajpayee had, in very bad faith, granted licences for the spectrum on first-come first-serve policy. It is illegal and unconstitutional because the policy had been devised to enable its friends and relatives to amass wealth.

But the Supreme Court of India interpreted it as a holy policy.

          The Congress Government under Dr. Manmohan Singh granted licences to hundreds of people following the same policy.

          Due to the stiff competition, the call charges fell down drastically.

The people gained.

The gain accrued to the people is equivalent to the gain accrued to the government.

The court knowingly lost sight of this crucial point, and interpreted it as a loss to the exchequer.

          The court, further, made the people to imagine that the loss was Re. 1.76 lakh crore per year. Actually, the purported loss had been calculated for 30 years!  

          With regard to the coal block allocation case, it must be stated that the court suppressed many constitutional points mentioned by this man. Ultimately the coal blocks were cornered by the coal cartel led by the ruling class – mentioned in Chapter 337.

          If the government had nationalized the natural resources, anyone would have said that the actions of the court have better consequences.

          Here, the natural resources went in the hand of the ruling class.

          The people felt pain when their representatives handed over the natural resources to a large number of private individuals.

          The judgements produced still more pain because the government handed over them to a smaller number of private individuals.      

          The people applauded the judgements because of their immediate good consequences.

          The judgements are actually bad because the general or long term consequences are bad.

Evidently, the unjust actions caused injustice.

          The just actions always cause justice.

          Therefore, the actions of the court are a wicked response against justice.

This is letter No.370.

This letter is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 7 May 2015

7- 5-2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.