374
THE
LEARNED JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:
“NOT
ATTENDING TO WHAT THEY OUGHT”
Saying that the public money shall not
be spent to build personality cults, a two judge bench of the Supreme Court of
India comprising Justices Rangan Gogoi and
N. V. Ramana, on 13 May 2015,
restrained the government from publishing the photograph of political leaders
in government advertisements.
The court exempted the President,
the Prime Minister and the Chief Justice of India.
It directed the Government to appoint
a three –member ombudsman of persons with un-impeachable integrity to monitor
the violations.
It could have asked the three-member
ombudsman to see that the media report men and matters according to their
degree of importance.
It did not do so.
Therefore, the wicked people - willing
to deny freedom of expression- alone will be appointed as the members of the
said body.
Thus it- quite unwittingly- helps build personality
cults.
A Supreme Court of India bench
comprising Justices Madan B. Lokur,
Kurian Joseph and A.K. Sikri
ordered an inquiry by the Chief Vigilance
Commissioner (CVC) to ascertain
whether the meetings of former Director
of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Mr. Rangit Sinha with the
accused affected the 2G probe or not.
The latent decision of the court to
strange this work affects the 2G probe.
A Supreme Court of India bench headed
by Justice J.Chelameswar dismissed
the petition of the private telecom companies – Bharti Airtel, Idea Cellular, Vodafone Mobile Services and Loop Mobile
India- that sought the extension of telecom licences by another 10 years.
It is customary for the private
companies to get unjust favours from the Supreme Court.
Now they failed.
Apparently, the court has scored a
point of virtue.
The Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi, arrived at China on
14 May 2015 on a three-day visit.
The President of China, Mr. Xi Jinping, welcomed him to his
ancestral home province.
Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi had talks with his Chinese counterpart, Li Kepqiang, at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing.
Prime
Minister Mr. Narendra Modi
requested his Chinese counterpart to reduce the trade imbalance that remains at
$35 billion per year in favour of China.
The trade imbalance is in the
interest of China. Therefore, it will not take any step to annul it.
However, it is a decision that must
be taken by Mr. Modi at New Delhi.
Therefore, his demand is a ridiculous
one.
He, further, challenged the Prime Minister of
China to solve the border issues to realize the full potential of bilateral relationship.
The border issues are in the
interest of China. The present development is due to its border policy.
If the trade imbalance tends to
turn in favour of India, China would activate its forces at the border.
Chinese banks extended a loan of $
2.5 billion to Bharti Airtel- an Indian
private company.
It is the bribe given for the
present visit of the prime minister.
The prime minister morally accepted
a bribe to visit China.
In the past, China gave a huge
amount of money to the Indian companies in the pretext of loan.
Now it rules India through them.
Thus, Mr. Narendra Modi had been chosen by China as the Prime Minister of
India long before the Indians voted for him.
The two nations signed deals worth
$22 billion. 24 agreements were signed.
India is responsible for the faster
growth rate of China.
Now, China aspires to invest in India.
Some Indian companies want to spread their money in China.
However, the Indian investments
would be less than the Chinese investments.
Prime Minister Mr. Modi described China as the factory of the world and India its Back
Office.
Thus China imperceptibly penetrates
India through the Back Office.
Even if it is for the prosperity of
India, the Supreme Court must make the people know that the above view belongs
to this man.
The prime minister paid a visit to
Mongolia on 17 May 2015 and pledged a loan of $1 billion.
In a verdict on 13 May 2015, a
Supreme Court of India bench comprising Justices Dipak Misra and P.C. Pant
said that freedom of expression is subject to inherent limitations within the
constitutional parameters.
This is the reply of the court to
the cry for Freedom.
The latent constitutional parameters
set by the Supreme Court make India the only slave nation in the world.
Anyone going through this work would
say that the learned judges are “not attending to what they ought”.
It is a wonder that the political
philosophers envisaged this condition long ago.
If the people get Freedom to know this
work, they would force the court to put right the public wrongs.
As the learned judges fear that things
could go wrong frightfully, they do not allow this to happen.
Advocate Mr. Gopal Subramonium told the bench that freedom to offend is also
a part of freedom of speech.
But he lost the case.
Therefore, he joined the rank of
the judges to deny Freedom.
The above bench said that the people
shall not mouth vulgar words against the revered national leaders like Mahatma Gandhi.
A man shall not mouth vulgar words against anyone.
However, the contribution of the
present man for the Freedom of Indians is far greater than that of Mahatma Gandhi.
The court thinks that this work
belittles his image.
Therefore, it conceals this work.
This
is Letter No. 374.
Hundreds of letters have been sent to
the chiefs of the Indian Army and the Indian Air force.
There exists a belief that the armed
forces have greater points of virtue than the Supreme Court of India.
They could make public the action
taken report to the nation.
This letter is
being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of
India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and
posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 18 May 2015
18- 5-2015.
V. Sabarimuthu,
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu
PIN: 629167, India.
No comments:
Post a Comment