431. THE JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: LACKING THE REQUISITE STANDARD OF UNDERSTANDING?

431

THE LEARNED JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:

LACKING THE REQUISITE POWER OF UNDERSTANDING?

          The Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi, met the President of the USA, Mr. Barack Obama, on 28 September 2015 at New York. They decided to strengthen the Indo- US relations.

          Earlier he met the chief executives of technological giants at the Silicon Valley in California and requested them to invest in India.

          Addressing the Indian community in the USA, he said that there were no allegations against him.

          This work contains a serious allegation against him.

          He added that he would make governance more transparent.

          If the people get a chance to look at this work today, he will cease to be the prime minister tomorrow.

          Evidently, he cannot ensure transparency.

          He presented a cosy picture of India.

          Indiscriminate imports affect the small and marginal farmers. The rubber farmers are the worst hit. It is like stopping the pension payments to the public servants. But he cannot understand this.

          Why did he talk such things to the Indian community?

          If the prime ministers choose to do like this, it would recoil on the Indians.

          The Union Government, on 28 September 2015, decided to borrow 2.3 lakh crore.

          Why does it borrow money after lending about Re. ten lakh crore?

          Further, what happens to the foreign exchange?        The Supreme Court of India must reveal the names of entities that consumed the foreign exchange - over a certain maximum- in the last 15 years.

          Further, each State Government could be asked to maintain a foreign exchange account.

          This is to prevent unauthorized consumption of the foreign exchange.

          The Governor of the Reserve Bank of India, Mr. Reghuram Rajan, on 29 September 2015, said that the common man would be benefited by the 0.5 per cent rate cut announced by him.

          Actually, the banks adjust it in the number of installments. Some banks require processing fee to affect the rate cut. They bring more misery to the common man. He knows this.         

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), on 28 September 2015, told a Special Court at New Delhi that former Prime Minister of India Dr. Manmohan Singh was not part of any conspiracy in the coal blocks allocation.

It is a repercussion of this work.

The court need not drag other ministers also.

The Seventh Pay Commission, on 29 September 2015, recommended 30 per cent pay hike to the employees. Apparently, this is an unofficial report.

The armed forces and the Supreme Court of India must either grant Freedom or they must take into account the money extracted to consume the remittances - as mentioned earlier.

They must reckon the yield from the natural resources also. Now, the government gets virtually nothing.

Any leakage would benefit the ruling class only.

The Chief Justice of India H.L. Dattu, on 29 September 2015, said that the judges are not happy.

The Supreme Court of India must enlarge Freedom.

It is its duty.

But it is afraid of it.

How can it do its duty?

If a person cannot do his duty, it will not bring any happiness to him.

However, it may be profitable to him.

He, further, defended the collegiums system of appointing judges because it scrutinized the integrity of the person through the Intelligence Bureau (IB).

The IB gives its opinion about the selected candidates.

Here, the question is selection of candidates.

He must understand that the whole Legislature – Lower House of Parliament, Upper House of Parliament and the State Assemblies- and the whole judges put together cannot give arbitrary power to any entity– collegiums, IB or group of ministers –to select judges.

The utterance of the Chief Justice of India after 430 letters gives the impression that the judges lack the requisite power of understanding.

Otherwise, will any judge fail to understand the meaning of the word ‘arbitrary’?

The present judges did not clear any competitive examination. The selectors could have taken into account at least the marks they scored in the SSLC examination.

This is letter No.431.

 This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 1-10- 2015

1-10--2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.