188. Why do the elections in India null and void?

188

THE REAL EXECUTIONERS

The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 28 October 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the President of India, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC), Chief Justice of India   and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai and Calcutta High Courts.  It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

          On 28 October 2011, The New Indian Express – through its editorial –said that the political parties looked after corporate interests in return for the money they received from them.

          The above statement is not a correct one. The truth is that the political leaders give public money to the corporate houses for name.

          All political leaders are the recipients of this favour. If this work comes out as headline news for some days, the political leaders will be ashamed of looking at the face of the people.

          It is true that some corporate houses give money to the friends and relatives of the political leaders. But they do this many years after the receipt of the public assets.

          It is again true that they have been giving money to all political parties before elections. But they had taken a decision to save this money long ago. The euphemism for this is elimination of money power in elections.

         Hereafter, they will not give money to political parties.

          Instead, they will give political power to the individuals like Mr. L.K. Advani, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, Mr. Ragul Gandhi, Anna Hazare or to their other confidants.

          They execute the plan like this. If a man gives 100 sq feet of space for advertisement during elections, someone says that he should not give this without giving permission in writing. Then the Village Officer asks the owner to erase it or get police permission. When the owner ignores this, a revenue official comes to the house. After that, two or three police personnel come to the house at night and ask the owner to either erase it or go to the police station on the next day. The owner chooses to erase it rather than going to the police station.   

       From the other end, they effectively monitor the number of vehicles, loud speakers and others. They even prevent the people from taking money to certain selected areas.

          Above all, they do not allow vehicles to ply voters.

          They do everything latently through the aid of the Election Commission of India.

          Pointing out the limit for spending money, they drastically cut down political funding. Thus, even the black money refuses to descend to the bottom. The usual economic activity during elections is now practically vanishing due to this.

          The repercussion is that the voters do not know the number of candidates, their nature or even their names. Even educated people go to the polling booth like blind men. They cannot but vote for a symbol present in the voting machine.

          The corporate houses release positive/negative news about one political party or other to ensure its success/defeat. In the next election, they reverse this - if necessary - in favour of another set of political parties or leaders.

          It is true that the people of India are poor.  But even 1 per cent of the people cannot be influenced by money power. But, 99 per cent of the people can be influenced by the media. The people are not corrupted but cheated. Thus, the act of conducting elections - as at present is - constitutionally null and void.

          As the media remains in the hand of less than ten corporate houses, even the Supreme Court of India is afraid of it. This is the reason why the learned judges of the Supreme Court of India are not the real executioners of India. The real executioners are about ten individuals who remove the public assets. Naturally, the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Election Commission of India, CBI and all other organs of the Government are afraid of them.

       

          India helped defeat a Canadian move to deny Sri Lanka the right to hold the next Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (Chogm) in 2013 because of the human rights violations of Sri Lanka. The newspapers revealed this on 28 October 2011

          India cannot but do this because India –and not Sri Lanka –committed the crimes against humanity in Sri Lanka.

        On 30 October 20011, Mrs. Niira Radia – an underground mole- decided to quit communication consultancy business. She said that some vested interests had been trying to cause harm to her and she- instead of fighting back – wanted to give them their victory. She requested the victors to savour it.

          It may be noted that all constitutional authorities continue to remain in their respective positions because of the underground moles. Therefore, the meaning of the word “victory” is not a clear one. However, she knows everything better.

          The CBI, on 5 November 2011, arrested a Tamil Nadu state based Railway contractor for a fraud of Re. 110 crore. This shows that the executioners have decided to check corruption in the lower level. After giving Re. 3 lakh crore from the Provident Fund (PF) to private parties, the Supreme Court of India is checking corruption in the order of Re. 100 crore. It is a human rights problem.

       President of India Pratibha Devisingh Patil said that corruption eroded rule of law and hurt the common man most. It is not customary for the media to report the views of the President of India with any continuity. Very rarely, the public sector TV channels recognize her speech. Therefore, she publishes her views through her website.

    According to an internet report, there was sombre mood at the rally venue of Mr. L.K. Advani in Banglore on 30 October 2011. He cancelled two of his scheduled meetings with the press. This shows that the copies of the letters submitted to Her Excellency the President of India reach the hand of the political leaders without any delay. However, the executioners persuaded him to continue with the work detailed to him. 

          The Government, on 2 November 2011, said that one lakh soldiers would be recruited for the Indian Army in view of the growing military presence of China along the border.

        In this connection, it must be stated that a part of the Provident Fund (PF) money secretly went to a bank in Hong Kong. This is equivalent to giving the money to China. It is a treasonable offence.

      Further, Indian market has been secretly opened to China just for commission. With which money India would pay to the soldiers is not clear. The present Government would procrastinate to recruit soldiers is a different matter. 

         

          The CBI, on 2 November 2011, summoned YSR Congress Party Chief Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy in an illegal mining case.

          The executioners are ready to place a political leader in any responsible position. They would allow them to earn money. They would even part with one or two small pieces of their land at the appropriate time.

         But the political leaders should not take the natural assets beyond a certain limit. They shall not remove the money from the banks and the LIC also beyond a certain limit. Thus, the executioners would allow the POSCO to remove natural assets and not any Indians.        

          Jindal of Jindal Aluminium had donated Re. 25 lakh to Anna Hazare. This confirms the fact that Anna Hazare is a representative of the executioners. He is the Gandhiji of the present day.

          In this connection, it must be noted that a Mr. Jindal had collected over Re.10,000 crore through the stock market in the pretext of a steel plant in the Andra Pradesh state long ago. The Supreme Court of India alone could say whether it was the same Jindal or not.

          Further, the revelation that former Law Minister Shanti Bhushan donated Re. 4 lakh to him shows that an enquiry should have been conducted for the Re. 4 crore issue.  

         Business Line, on 3 November 2011, disclosed that the SAIL and the POSCO would sign a joint venture to establish a 1.5 million steel plant at Bokaro.

          In this connection, it must be reiterated that the POSCO was granted permission to explore Indian ores only to enable some private parties to buy assets in South Korea. The present writer had described this as unconstitutional adjustments of interests. Constitutionally, it is null and void. In this matter, the executioners are executing the Supreme Court of India and the people.

          However, the Government has a right to do anything after allowing the people to know the above view. Until then, it shall not go ahead with this plan.

          Mr. Kejriwal –a member of the Anna Hazare team–returned Re.9 lakh in dues to settle the issue of his resignation from the IRS. The Supreme Court of India alone knows its meaning.

       Congress party president Sonia Gandhi and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh were ranked 11th and 19th respectively in the Forbes list of world’s 70 most powerful people in 2011. They give public money to some private parties in a carefully planned manner - for name and fame- with no right to do it. It is more heinous than the act of accepting Re. 2 lakh crore as bribe. But the executioners describe them as honest people and Raja as a dishonest man.

           Rejecting the bail applications of the accused in the 2G spectrum case, CBI Special Court Judge O.P. Saini, on 3 November 2011, said:

“1.The charges against the accused are very serious in nature because they ruined the economy of the state.

2. Their ultimate objective was to use public money in a carefully planned manner for personal benefit with no right to do it.

3. Providing a safe and secure environment for witnesses to testify truthfully is possible only by keeping the accused in custody.

4. There are possibilities that the accused may tamper with evidence.

5. “A murder may be committed in the heat of moment upon passion being aroused. An economic offence is committed with cool calculation and deliberate design with an eye on personal profit regardless of consequence to community”. He quoted this from an order of the Supreme Court of India.

6. If the witnesses do not gather courage to tell the truth before the court, the tripod (of accused, victim and witness) would break down and truth will not come out.

          In this connection, it must be stated that the Constitution of India does not allow the Government to auction the natural assets or to sell the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) against public money.

          Therefore, the above charges are against the Supreme Court of India, political leaders, executioners and the CBI. They are the accused bodies and the charge-sheet must be read accordingly.

          Now, all right thinking people would say that the Supreme Court of India transferred public assets to private parties in a carefully planned way with cool calculation and deliberate design regardless of consequence to community.

        

          The Supreme Court of India, on 5 November 2011, granted bail to former Satyam Chief Ramalinga Raju. He had been in jail for 32 months.

          All economic offenders must be released on bail pending the prosecution of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh for the Re. 3 lakh crore in the PF money

     

          Mr. Prasant Bhushan, a member of the Anna Hazare team, said that he would contact the retired judges of the Supreme Court of India to function as the so-called “ombudsman” for the “Core Committee of India Against Corruption”.

          His statement shows his proximity to judges. This must be interpreted in the light of the allegations against him.

      Justice C.S. Karnan of the Madras High Court, 7 November 2011, submitted a written complaint before the “National Commission for Scheduled Caste” alleging caste discrimination by his “brother judges”.

          The Supreme Court of India has not given answers to 187 letters before it. It is not taking any action over at least 3 letters of the President of India.

          All authorities must take action over the letters. The Chief Justices of the High Courts have a duty to inform the action taken by them to the people. Even the Chiefs of the India Army and the Indian Air Force must take necessary action over the letters.

          The Supreme Court of India must recognize the charges against it. It could even now transform itself into the real executioner and restore the vanquished assets without fear or favour. This is to establish justice only.

       

           The facts from 28 October 2011 to 7 November 2011 are being submitted to Mrs.Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 8 November 2011.

             The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, Chief Election Commissioner of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, CBI, Chief Information Commissioner and the Chief Justices of some High Courts for necessary action.

8 November 2011

 V.Sabarimuthu.

26-3 Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN:629167

Kanyakumari District

           

       

187 Advani - Raja - Supreme Court

187

A WHIPPING BOY

        The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 7 October 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the President of India, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC), Chief Justice of India   and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai and Calcutta High Courts.  It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

          The new Chief of Indian Air Force, Air Chief Marshal Norman Anil Kumar Browne, on 9 October 2011, said that an Air Force Station each would be started in all metro cities. A Station might be established at Trivandrum also.

          The militant people killed 6 soldiers in the Chhattisgarh State on 9 October 2011. The print media did not publish this news.

          Army killed two militant people in the Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) State on 9 October 2011.

          The CBI, on 9 October 2011, said that Home Minister Chithambaram could not be implicated in the 2G spectrum case. As the Supreme Court of India did not bother to find out the money given by the “cash rich” Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) to the Unit Trust of India (UTI), the CBI is waiting for a green signal from the court.

          Appearing for the Reliance Telecom, Senior Counsel Mukul Rohatgi told the Supreme Court of India that the proceedings of the 2G Special Court adversely affected the companies of Mr. Anil Ambani. In this connection, he requested the court to restrain the media from publishing anything. The bench asked the counsel to seek appropriate remedy from the Special Court. The court might surrender to his demand. If this happens, the people will no longer see the different facets of the case.

          Mr. L.K. Advani, the leader of the BJP, started a 40-day nationwide anti corruption journey called “Rath Yathra” on 11 October 2011.

          In this connection, it must be stated that the NDA Government had given public money to the executioners of India- as mentioned by this writer on 3 February 2002 in Chapter 8. Some public assets were given to charge – sheeted companies.

          The people do not know this. In fact, at least 1% of the people knew what Muammar Gaddafi did to Libya. Even this people do not know what the NDA Government did to the nation.

          The crucial point is that the NDA Government gave the public assets to them on behalf of all political leaders –ruling and opposition. This is to make their position secure in India.

      Thus the political power of all political leaders is the gratis given by the recipients of this money.     

          There is no difference between leader Advani or Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Therefore, they can make him - or anyone of their choice – the Prime Minister of India. They will create the necessary public opinion through their media wing. The Rath Yathra and voting are formalities only.

          This condition exists because the Supreme Court of India conceals this work from the eye of the people with an “ulterior motive”.       

          On 12 October 2011, the CBI- in its First Information Report (FIR) – said that former Union Minister Dayanidhi Maran benefited – indirectly - Re.549.96 crore as quid pro quo for various favours to Aircel of Maxis - a Malaysia-based company. According to the FIR, the amount was given to the SUN TV owned by his brother Kalanidhi Maran, through the overvaluation of its shares. However, the people still believe that there exists a truce between the SUN TV, and the ND TV. Otherwise, he would have been arrested.

       A group of leading luminaries – Mr. Jamshyd Godrej, Mr. Deepak Parekh, Mr. Keshub Mahindra, Mr. N. Vaghul, Mr. Nachiker Mor, Mr. Yezdi Malegan, Ms. Anu Aga, Mr. Justice  Sam Variava, Mr. Justice B.N. Krishna, Prof. S. Narasimham, Dr.A. Vaidyanathan, Mr. Azim Premji, Dr. Vimal Jalan, Dr. Ashok Ganguly- in their second open letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh recommended: 1. A new Anti-corruption Bill 2. Online auction for the allocation of natural resources  and 3. Increase  of judges to fight against corruption. The first letter was sent in January 2011.

          In this connection, it must be reiterated that the judges from Mumbai are, as a rule, representatives of the manipulators. Justice B.N.Krishna and Justice Sam Variava hail from Mumbai. They had been receiving letters from this writer for over four years before their retirement from the Supreme Court of India. Yet, they conceal the salient points of this work from the people. In fact, if Justice Variava goes one step ahead of the manipulators, Justice B.N. Krishna would go two steps.

           Mr.Vimal Jalan had to resign from the post of the Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) presumably because of the Bank of India (BoI) matter presented in Chapter 8.

       Therefore, their proposals are to promote bribery and slavery.

          Evidently, the proposal of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to start 74 CBI courts all over India is an idea distilled by them.

          Excise Collection dipped by over 8 per cent in September 2011. This happens because India is illegally importing Chinese products just to enable some boys to get commission. Even the bicycles for children come from China either through an illegal route or under negligible import duty thereby jeopardizing the interests of Indian industry.

        Former Karnataka Chief Minister Yeddyurappa was, on 15 October 2011, remanded to judicial custody in the so-called illegal de-notification of lands in and around Bangalore.

          In this connection, it must be stated that the friends and relatives of the leaders buy assets in certain localities before according sanction to new roads, bus stands or airports.

          Further, compared to the crime committed by the judges of the Supreme Court of India, the crime committed by him is a negligible one.

          Therefore, there is no justification for sending him to jail. It is a human rights problem.

          On 16 October 2011, The New Indian Express –through its writer a Mr. Balbir Punj –  said that a massive collapse of Indian System was visible. This could be prevented by initiating prosecution proceedings against the learned judges of the Supreme Court for secretly facilitating the conversion of public assets into private assets.

         

        A Mr. Lal Sharma alleged that Anna Hazare and his group had played a fraud by receiving a cheque for Re.45 lakh for his trust on 31 March 1995 from the Consolidated Fund of India before its registration on 6 April 1995.  He levelled a few more similar charges against him. A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Aftab Alam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai, on 17 October 2011, admitted this as Public Interest Litigation (PIL).

          Chief Justice of India S.H. Kapadia, on 19 October 2011, requested the judges to face constructive criticism of their actions for the development of law. Apparently, he is losing his grip over the judges. Otherwise, he would not have talked to the judges through the media as if they were “fallen angels” of Milton.

          Though it is a digression, it must be stated that the revolutionary fighters in Libya, on 20 October 2011, killed Gaddafi. He was dragged from hiding in a drainage pipe and shot dead. According to reports, he had begged for mercy from the captors.

          The allegation was that he had turned the oil rich Libya into his own personal fiefdom.

          Did Gaddafi transfer anything equivalent to Re. 3 lakh crore to anyone?

          The Constitution of India permits the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Parliament, media and even the people to control the Prime Minister of India. Yet, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh managed everyone and transferred Re. 3 lakh crore in Provident Fund (PF) to two or three people.

          Some people would say that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh did not use his power for terrorist attack. But the killings of the Sri Lankan Tamils are more heinous than the terrorist attacks of Gaddafi. The difference is that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had given food to them before killing.

  

      Markandey Katjiu, Chairman of the Press Council of India (PCI) and former judge of the Supreme Court of India, said that if the media proved incorrigible, harsh measures might be taken to correct it. The Hindu published his words as a centre page article on 22 October 2011. He must abide by the Constitution of India before talking like this.

       A Mr. Lal Sharma alleged that Anna Hazare and his group had played a fraud by receiving a cheque for Re.45 lakh on 31 March 1995 from the Consolidated Fund of India before its registration on 6 April 1995.  He levelled a few more similar charges against him. A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Aftab Alam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai, on 17 October 2011, admitted this as Public Interest Litigation (PIL).

          The Supreme Court of India, on 22 October 2011, denied bail to former Satyam Chief Ramalinga Raju.

          In this connection, it must be stated that the Supreme Court of India is even now secretly allowing the public sector Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) to buy the shares of private companies. Further, it is allowing tax exemption to investments in the hands of private parties. These are acts of corruption. Therefore, there is no justification for keeping him in prison.

          The CBI, on 22 October 2011, said that former Minister Raja committed an illegal act or a legal act by illegal means while allocating 2G spectrum. In order to justify its stand, the CBI said that Raja had dominion over the spectrum.          The CBI - in order to shield Prime Minister Manmohan Singh – argues that Raja functioned as a super prime minister.

          In this connection, it must be stated that none in India has dominion over the lives of the people or their assets. Even the Chief Justice of India has no absolute power. This is the demand of the Constitution of India.

  

  The Special CBI Court, on 22 October 2011, framed charges against A. Raja and 16 others under section 420 (cheating), section 120B (criminal conspiracy and some other sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Special Judge O.P. Saini in his order said:1. The allegation of bribery for Re.200 crore is not an imaginary one.2. There is no merit in the submission that none would pay a bribe 16 months after obtaining the alleged favour. 3. The supremacy of the Constitution and the rule of law cannot be compromised in the grab of affordability of mobile phones at cheaper prices or in the name of fresh investments –domestic or foreign. 4.  The private players should not be allowed to violate constitutional norms and 5. The Government is at liberty to follow any laudable policy as long as the same is not in violation of the Constitution of India.

It is obvious that the above orders are against the avowed anti-constitutional doctrine of the Supreme Court of India.

The hard words used against Raja are against the Supreme Court of India. If someone points out this to Judge O.P. Saini, he would say that Raja is being used as a whipping- boy for the crime committed by the Supreme Court of India.

The Union Cabinet, on 25 October 2011, approved a proposal to provide interest-free loans to the tune of Re.108.77 crore to benefit 56 co-operative textile mills in the Maharastra state.

Evidently, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh brings to the notice of the Union Cabinet small issues involving Re. hundreds of crore only. He gives dominion over money matters of Re. one lakh or more to individuals or Group of Minister (GoM). Thus the decisions for the allocations of spectrum and the method of utilization of the PF money were, apparently, taken without the knowledge of the Union Cabinet and the people at large.

The Ministry of Law & Justice, Government of India, sent another letter – No.L.15012/1/2011-Jus-  on 4 October 2011 to the Registrar (Judicial) Supreme Court of India. In that letter, the Union Government asked the Supreme Court of India to establish justice to the letters received through the President of India under intimation to this writer.

If the Supreme Court had directed the Government to submit an action report over this work, the Government would not have sent these letters.

Now, the above letter is like a presidential reference to the Supreme Court of India. Therefore, it should not hesitate to do justice to the letters before it.

In this connection, it must be noted that the Chief Justice of India needs the pleasure of the President of India to continue in office.

 

             The facts from 7 October 2011 to 27 October 2011 are being submitted to Mrs.Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 28 October 2011.

             The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, CBI, Chief Information Commissioner and the Chief Justices of some High Courts for necessary action.

28 -10- 2011

 V.Sabarimuthu.

26-3 Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN:629167

Kanyakumari District

       

186-Supreme Court of India -Criminal Breach of Trust and Conspiracy

186

Criminal Breach of Trust and Conspiracy

The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 6 September 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC), Chief Justice of India   and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai and Calcutta High Courts.  It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

          The Business Line, on 12 September 2011, said that the economy was all set to a slow down.

          The Hindu published the answers of Chief Minister Oommen Chandy to some carefully selected questions in its issue on 12 September 2011. This is a small reward for the 82 acre plot given to the TCS by the Government of Kerala recently. The leader of the opposition, Mr. V.S. Achuthanandan,   did not attach any significance to this.

A Mr. Satfir Singh, submitted before Metropolitan Magistrate Tyagita Singh that Anna Hazare and his team had instigated the people to lay a siege on the houses of many Members of Parliament (MPs) and ministers to press their demand for an anti-corruption bill. Ordinarily, others would not have got bail for such offences because their motive was not curbing corruption. However, the Delhi Police, on 16 September 2011, told the court that they had not received any complaint.

In this connection, it may be recalled an MP said in Parliament that the supporters of Anna Hazare had attacked his house.

The Supreme Court is conspicuous by its silence in the above matter.

According to some reports, the CBI is investigating the assets of Reddy brothers in Indonesia. This is to find out whether they used the money earned by them - through illegal mining – to buy assets in that country. They are in jail now. The CBI is relentlessly questioning them

According to a theory, the act of sending all small entrepreneurs to jail would lead to the construction of India, and the act of using the public assets for public investments would lead to the destruction of India. The legality or otherwise is not the basis for the action of the CBI. Otherwise, the case booked under the official secret act would not have gone into oblivion. Former Supreme Court judge Santosh Hegde and the other crusaders of corruption are not ready to mention even the Medical Council of India (MCI) case. This theory could be called Santosh Hegdeism.

Mr. Ram Jethmalini, an MP and eminent advocate, declared that due to the sacrifice of the leaders, the humblest citizen in India got freedom of speech. This is, actually, his reply to this work. The New Indian Express published this - as a centre page article - on 21 September 2011.

Ram Jethmalini knew that the freedom of expression is the freedom of the people to know the views of others, and not at all the freedom to talk anything in a tea shop or write letters like this.

The people actually think that there exists 100 per cent freedom of expression in India.

But anyone going through this work will tell that there is 100 per cent denial of freedom of expression in India.

Otherwise, the people might have seen this work.

Incidentally, the view of Ram Jethmalini shows that the reputation of a judge of the Supreme Court is a function of his manipulation power.

The militant people, on 25 September 2011, killed an MLA and his body guard in the Orissa State. The learned judges of the Supreme Court might have compared the murder to the act murdering the judges. Yet they are not ready to take remedial measures.

The CBI, on 26 September 2011, submitted before the CBI judge O.P.Saini that former Telecom Minister Mr. A.Raja and Mrs. Kanimozhi MP committed offences under section 409 (Criminal Breach of Trust) read with section 120  (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) because they “dishonestly” disposed of the valuable 2G spectrum in violation of the “existing policies” and the eligibility criterion, in order to confer wrongful gain on some private companies.

The CBI said that three private telecom firms should also be charged under section 409 for their collusion with three public servants in getting the spectrum.   

The circumstances that forced the CBI to invoke sections 409 and 120 against Raja must be analyzed in the proper perspective.

The illegality is intrinsic in the decision of former Prime Minister Vajpayee to give the spectrum - arbitrarily - adopting a principle unknown to man kind. But the Supreme Court does not see any illegality in that policy.

 Further, former Prime Minister Vajpayee sold a few Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) not only in violation of the Constitution of India but also against the guidelines devised for selling them. The Supreme Court knew this.

Above all, the present Government is continuously converting public money into private money with the knowledge of the Supreme Court.

But the CBI is afraid of using the word “dishonest” against the learned judges of the Supreme Court. Therefore, it is using the word against Raja so that the highest institution in India would undergo a metamophosis.

Therefore, the charge-sheet must be read as follows.

The learned judges of the Supreme Court committed offences under section 409 read with section 120 of the IPC because they “dishonestly” refused to enforce freedom of expression, and connived at the disposal of the valuable public assets and public money in an unconstitutional way and in violation of the “existing policies” and the eligibility criterion, in order to confer wrongful gain on some private companies.

As the Supreme Court cannot deny the above charge, it is not giving a reply to 185 letters.

Now, the media and the principal opposition party, the BJP, wanted the resignation of Union Home Minister Chithambaram because he –rather than Raja- was responsible for taking the licence route to apportion the 2G spectrum.

To the above, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on 27 September 2011, said that some forces –with the intention destabilizing the polity- were making attempts to force early elections. He added that Chithambaram enjoyed his full confidence. In this way he said that he – not Raja or Chithabaram - was solely responsible for taking the licence route.

 Manmohan Singh had been a bureaucrat. The manipulators had inducted him in the Union Cabinet even before asking him to face an election. Therefore, he knew the meaning of the move of the media.

 Chithambaram had been a lawyer. The manipulators inducted him into the Union Government directly. As the Finance Minister of India under Prime Minister Deve Gowda, he deposited the surplus money of the PSUs in the Unit Trust of India (UTI). During the period of Prime Minister Vajpayee, he advised him to sell the PSUs to private parties. Recently, he wanted to help some private parties to buy assets abroad. Therefore, when the manipulators turned against him, he became speechless.

The manipulators are not persisting with their demand. However, the fact that they demanded his resignation for four or five days is a great development in India. In fact, it puzzled the common man.

The Business Line, on 22 September 2011, said that a recently signed pact - between India, and Bangladesh - might open the door of India to Chinese fabrics. Some manipulators are doing round the clock work to convert India into a vassal state of China. They have to do this for the commission they received from China.

The Supreme Court, on 22 September 2011, ordered multi-layered security for Padmanabhaswamy Temple at Trivandrum. There would be a no fly zone above the Temple.

Now, the temple is a target of attack for the enemies. Therefore, there must be an Air Force station at Trivandrum. For this,   the measures taken to protect the buildings like White House, Parliament House may be implemented.

The Supreme Court did not issue any order to finish the valuation work within a few days.

In this connection, it must be stated that it is against public interest to take 8 to 12 months to do the valuation work. Any mathematician will tell that probability –rather than possibility- acquires credibility when there is large number of similar articles. Therefore, Supreme Court could ascertain the views of mathematicians in this matter and complete the valuation work within a month.

The Hindu, on 29 September 2011, reported that 22 Indian traders accused of diamond smuggling had been languishing in China for more than 600 days. The paper revealed that they had evaded $7.3 million in custom duties.

90 per cent of the toys and the other plastic items present in the shops all over India are from China. All are illegally imported items. Even blind men sell illegally imported Chinese articles. But India has no eye to see this. As a result, 90 per cent of the industries have perished. At the same time, Indian traders are languishing in Chinese jails. The Supreme Court is in the know of commission of this offence.

 

Mr. Prasant Bhusan, appearing for the Centre for Public Interest Litigation in the 2G spectrum case, told the Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Singhvi and Ganguly that the CBI was “dishonest” in its investigation.

The CBI is carefully shielding Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in the 2G spectrum case even though everything happened with his knowledge.  Further, the case is being monitored by the Supreme Court.

The CBI could be a biased one. It might enact a coup against the Government or Union Ministers. In these conditions, the Supreme Court takes charge of monitoring only to make the probe an impartial one. Naturally, an investigation monitored by the Supreme Court –ordinarily- cannot be a “dishonest” one.

Therefore, the above advocate used the word “dishonest” against the Supreme Court rather than against the CBI.

The learned judges chose not to take action against the advocate because they are not monitoring the case in an impartial way.  Naturally, the Supreme Court, as an institution, does not possess the critical energy badly needed to proceed against him.

 Union Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee, in a letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on 27 September 2011, stated that several departments –department of the prime minister included - had played a role in the decision to adopt the license route for spectrum allocation.

The manipulators demanded the resignation of Home Minister Chithambaram because the 2G spectrum had been allotted with his knowledge. But, when Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee said that everything happened with the knowledge of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, the media went into a cocoon. This shows that they want to protect the image of the Supreme Court and the Prime Minister in the 2G spectrum case.

The direct consequence of the above development is that the Supreme Court would have to depend upon the media to save its face.

Mr. Prasant Bhushan told the Supreme Court bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and A.K.. Ganguly, on 29 September 2011, that Reliance Group, Tatas and some others gave donations to a non profit organization just three days before the issuance of letter of intent for the grant of 2G licences. The CBI agreed that the donations were “suspicious”

To the total discomfiture of the Supreme Court, CBI senior counsel K.K. Venugopal , on the same day, submitted before the same bench that three officials of the Reliance Group, arrested in connection with the 2G case, might turn approvers. They had told the CBI that they were mere employees and in no way benefited monetarily.

The above developments show that some officers of the CBI remain under a state of motion. They are trying to execute the executioners! However, the Supreme Court might make them motionless. They might be even divested of all authority to unravel the case.

Whatever happens, the fact that some officials of the CBI dared to touch the men remaining under a six - tier security system is a remarkable one. No wonder the www.moneycontrol.com described the CBI action as “a figment of imagination”, “dream” “fiddling with this peculiar facts” “without any legal significance”  “projecting this for public consumption” and “cavalier attitude”.

The Hindu, on 30 September 2011, disclosed that the Union Government would borrow about Re. 4 lakh crore during 2011-2012.

The Union Government gave Re. 3.5 lakh crore in the Provident Fund (PF) to two or three people. They converted it into Re. 7.5 lakh crore in three years. Now, the Government is extracting Re.4 lakh crore from all over India.  Prabab Mukherjee  did not even think of recovering the money given to the UTI as bail out package. The Supreme Court was in the know of commission of this offence.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), on 30 September 2011, said that the international asset of the country stood at $ 435.6 billion, and the international financial liabilities stood at $ 669.2 billion. It disclosed that the direct investment abroad stood at $ 103.9 billion. It did not disclose the amount of public money converted into private assets abroad.

Mr. Tushar A. Gandhi, the great grandson of Mahatma Gandhi – in a centre page article in The New Indian Express on 1 October 2011 - claimed that the philosophy of Gandhiji was based on the cornerstone of truth, love, non-violence and peace, all of which were as old as the rivers and mountains. He added that the method adopted by him evolved from his philosophy.

The method of undertaking fasting and the call to the students through the media to boycott classes are to create violence and unrest. Even processions and public meetings would create unrest when the media work behind them. Therefore, the method adopted by Gandhiji was not at all a non-violent one. England tried to make it a non-violent one. Yet many people died due to the freedom struggle. Just as the media created Anna Hazare to perpetrate Santosh Hegdeism, Gandhiji was created to perpetrate slavery.

 Gandhiji could have –just like the present writer- persisted with writing letters to the competent authorities to achieve his goal, if he had any faith in non violence.

Justice K.N. Basha of the Chennai High Court, on 30 September 2011, quashed the 14 year old gift case against Chief Minister Jayalalitha.

The case was that she- while in office as the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu- received Re. 2crore in demand drafts as birthday gifts in 1992.

The reason for quashing the proceedings was: 1. The “callous and inordinate delay” in completing the criminal proceedings. Citing the Supreme Court, the judge said that the petitioner’s constitutional right to speedy trial enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution stood flagrantly violated and 2. As she had shown the Re. 2 crore gift in her Income Tax return, she did not commit any offence.

A chief minister could receive a huge amount as commission while buying and selling. Even for buying drugs there are commissions. A chief minister of Tamil Nadu could receive about Re.2000 crore every year as commission for buying liquor alone. Therefore, Re. 2 crore is a very small amount.

Further, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had given to private parties more than $200 billion during his stint as the Finance Minister of India. He gave equal amount in the last seven years to some private parties. The gift he received for this favour was the posts of the finance minister of India and the prime minister of India.

After paying floral tribute at the Gandhiji’s statue in Geneva on 2 October 2011, Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, touched the chin of a 10 –year old Indian girl.

President Pratibha Patil had secretly allowed her Government to give Re. 3.5 lakh crore to three boys. The recipients earned Re.4.5 lakh crore within three years. Further, she is continuously allowing her Government to transmit public money into the hands of private parties. After doing this heinous job, she is touching the chin of innocent girls!

Infosys Chairman NR Naraya Murthy, on 5 October 2011, said that the engineers coming out of the IITs were not of good quality.

When the present writer pointed out the fact that the mark obtained by a student in the IIT-JEE is not an index of his intelligence but an index of the coaching, the media did not publish it. Now, there is a great debate.

Army Chief Gen. V.K. Singh, on 5 October 2011, said that China had deployed about 4000 troops in Pak Occupied Kashmir (PoK).

The Union Government decided to establish 74 CBI courts to try corruption cases.

If the Supreme Court could allow the Government to convert public assets into private assets, even 7400 CBI courts would be useless. The prime minister would convert public assets into private assets without answering thousands letters from any citizen of India. In fact, the act of catching the small fish after sparing the big fish is fast becoming a human rights problem in India.

The Department of Vigilence and Anti   Corruption (DVAC), raided the premises of former DMK Minister Pannerselvam and his relatives. Earlier it had raided houses of former ministers K.N. Nehru, K. Ponmudy and T.M. Anbarasan.

The DVAC has raided at least 10 premises of each former minister. This shows that they might have earned about Re. 200 crore to Re. 2000 crore each. But it must be compared to the Re 4.5 lakh crore earned by two or three manipulators.

The Supreme Court is not doing anything to establish justice in India.

After receiving 184 letters of this writer, the Union Government requested the Supreme Court to redress the grievances of this writer.

The Supreme Court could have defined the acts of corruption to put an end to corruption.

Or it could have said “no” to conversion of public assets into private assets. This two letter word might have saved 1000 million people.

Alternatively, it could have enforced freedom of expression.

It is not ready to even publish the letter sent by the Department of Justice to the Registrar (Judicial) Supreme Court of India. 

Does the Supreme Court not walk among 1000 million people as if they were animals?

   The facts from 6 September 2011 to 6 October 2011 are being submitted to Mrs.Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 7 October 2011.

             The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner and the Chief Justices of some High Courts for necessary action.

V.Sabarimuthu.

26-3 Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN:629167

Kanyakumari District