423. THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA: PLACING MORE CONSTRAINTS?

423

THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA:

PLACING CONSTRAINTS?

           The Bombay Stock Exchange, barred eight entities of Mr. Ramalinga Raju, founder of Satyam Computers, from accessing the securities market. The entities include two sons of Mr. Raju.

          If the Chief Justice of India is ready to enforce freedom of expression today, Mr. Raju would get back his Satyam tomorrow.

          The present predicament is a consequence of the concealment of this work.

          Defence Minister Mr. Manohar Parrikar, on 12 September 2015, said that One Rank One Pension (OROP) was not a heavy burden.

          It had been a difficult one until he said this.

          What is the reason for it?

          Just four days ago, the present man- in letter No. 419- said that the salaries could be doubled.

          The observation of the minister is the repercussion of that letter.

          It must be noted that the government allowed just 16 per cent pay rise in the Seventh Pay Commission.

          Now the salaries would be doubled unless the Chief Justice of India and the Chief of the Indian Army prevent it.

          Evidently, even for a somewhat reasonable pay, this work is necessary.

          Why should the Chief Justice of India conceal it from the people?

          What would he get if any other man is given credit for it?

         

           

Chief Justice of India H.L. Dattu, on 12 September 2015, requested the lawyers to stand by him to preserve the freedom of the judiciary.

Thus he wants Freedom to the judiciary to deny Freedom to 1000 million people.

          Bar Association President Mr. Dushyant Dave retorted that it is easy to enjoy freedom but difficult to preserve it.

He openly said that ‘individual freedom can’t be compromised’.

          He, further, said that ‘the judicial system is under stress and the way things are going it may take a long way’.

          Actually, it will take no time to remove the effects of the stress.

          If the Chief Justice of India thinks of removing the constraints placed on the system by the court, the system will immediately shift towards Freedom to annul the effects of the constraints.

          But he wants the lawyers to cover up the complaints against the judiciary.

          Thus he places more and more constraints on the system.

This is letter No.423.

 This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 13 -9- 2015

13-9--2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India    

422: THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA: BRINGING DISGRACE TO THE COURT?

422

THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA:

 BRINGING DISGRACE TO THE COURT?

          A Supreme Court of India bench headed by Justice T.S. Thakur, on 10 September 2015, advised the government to appoint the Law Officers by merit. It said that even property dealers having LLB degree are being appointed as law officers.

          Apparently, it is a precursor to the National Judicial Appointment Commission (NJAC) Act case verdict.

          The Union Government, on 10 September 2015, resolved to give public property to private Telecom Companies for erecting telephone towers.

          This work shows that this is another unconstitutional action.

          The government is doing this based on the BALCO judgement.

          The 2G spectrum verdict makes the above judgement null and void.

          The new adviser to the Chief Justice of India, Mr. K.K. Venugopal might advise the chief justice to put right the public wrongs. He might consider the suggestion given in letter No.6.

          Former Telecom Minister Mr. A. Raja appeared before the Special 2G court on 10 September 2015.

          The police cannot question the present or former ministers.

          But the people can.

          The people do, at times, smell a rat in the actions of the government.

          They make complaints to the Prime Minister of India to displace his government.

          When he chooses to conceal the complaints, the people come to the conclusion that he denies democracy.

Therefore, they approach the President of India.

          When the latter fails to do his duty, they approach the Chief Justice of India.

          The chief justice must see that such complaints reach the public domain.

          This is his primary duty.

          This is not happening in India.      

          The present Chief Justice of India may not be entirely responsible for this. The thief may be even entirely different persons.

These are the complaints against the government and the judiciary. None knows anything about these. We don’t want to conceal them from the eye of the people anymore. We want to be above suspicion.

The Chief Justice of India can even now talk like this; and make a report to the people.

You brought disgrace to the court. We will continue to strange your complaints.

This is the reply of the chief justice now. Such a stand brings disgrace to the court.

This has disastrous consequences.

The prosecution of Mr. Raja is one of the consequences.

It is specifically to conserve the public assets usurped by the ruling class since the BALCO judgement.

The history has no parallel for this persecution.

This is letter No.422.

 This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 11 -9- 2015

11-9--2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India    

         

          

421. THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: TRYING TO FIX THE RESPONSIBITY ON Mr. RAJA?

421

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:

TRYING TO FIX THE ILLEGALITY ON Mr. RAJA?

          The Union Government, on 9 September 2015, resolved to permit the private companies to sell the spectrum allocated to them.

This work shows that it is an unconstitutional action.

          The Supreme Court of India induced the government to do this.

Therefore, it will, as usual, strange this work and connive at the unconstitutional action.

          The Central Bureau of Investigation, CBI, on 9 September 2015, submitted a status report to the Supreme Court of India on the 2G spectrum allocation. Earlier, CBI interrogated former union ministers Mr. P. Chithambaram and Mr. Dayanidhi Maran in connection with the so called Aircel Maxis case.

          What the Government of India did, they did.

          Everything is on record.

          Therefore, they should not have been questioned.

          The Supreme Court of India conceals many complaints against the government.

          Therefore, it is the chief conspirator.

A Supreme Court of India Bench comprising Chief Justice H.L. Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra, on 9 September 2015, requested senior advocate Mr. K.K. Venugopal to assist the court in the 2G spectrum case. 

          It must be stated that the ruling class wanted to usurp all public assets.

          They approached the Supreme Court of India for it.

          The court, in the BALCO judgement on 10 December 2001, said that it would not interfere in the policy decision as mentioned in the blog: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com.

          Thus it allowed corruption in the pretext of policy decision.

          The present man pointed out the unconstitutional nature of the judgement through letter No.6 dated 3-1-2002.

          What right have you to interfere in a matter pertaining to us?

          You dare to pronounce your opinion over our judgement?

          Moreover, you read law to us.

          We will strange your letters.

          This was the reply of the court.

          Naturally, the ruling class usurped all public resources using the judgement.

          The spectrum was alienated on the first come- first serve- policy.

          It was a patently illegal policy.

          The court found it good because the ruling class got it.

          The UPA government should have restored the public resources..

Instead, it decided to follow the same illegal policy.

This helped prove out that the court inflicted illegality.

When over 400 applications were rejected, no one dropped even a letter to the court.

Later, they approached the court.

The court cancelled all allocations and sent the former Union Telecom Minister, Mr. A. Raja, to jail.

This was the dead knell of policy decision mentioned in the BALCO judgement.

Actually, the chief culprit is the court.

Now it tries to fix the illegality on Mr. Raja. Is not it?

This is letter No.421.

 This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 10 -9- 2015

10-9--2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India     

420. THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: MIGHT IS RIGHT?

420

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:

MIGHT IS RIGHT?

          The CBI Special Prosecutor, Mr. Anand Grover, said that former Union Telecom Minister Mr. A. Raja was the main conspirator of the 2G spectrum scandal.

          In this connection, it must be reiterated that a union minister cannot do anything illegal.

          If he does something illegal, it must be deemed that it is legal.

          It must be deemed that he does this with the authority of the Government.

          The moment he does something illegal, the prime minister must drop him from the Cabinet and remove the illegality.

          The affected parties can approach the courts with a writ petition as and when illegality occurs.

          At least they must send a letter to the Supreme Court of India pointing out the illegality.

          The investigation agencies can also do this.

          When the government does something illegal, the Supreme Court of India can seek a clarification.

          Naturally, it will be a debating point all over India.

          If the court is not satisfied with the clarification, it has a duty to prevent the illegality.          

          The court can take any action consistent with the Constitution of India.

          Freedom is a pre-requisite for this.

          If the court fails to do this, the investigation agencies shall not question any union minister at any time.

          They shall not look at the face of any union ministers with suspicion.

          The present prosecution of Mr. Raja is the direct consequence of the denial of Freedom.

          But the court says that might is right.

This is letter No.420.

 This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 9 -9- 2015

9-9--2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India    

          

419: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: ADOPTING AN OPEN MIND

419

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:

ADOPTING AN OPEN MIND

          The Hindu, on 5 September 2015, put the Seventh Pay Commission benefits at 16 per cent. The basis for the report was the medium-term expenditure frame work presented to Parliament a few days ago.

          The Hindu said that the benefits would wreck havoc on the government finances. It asked the government to downsize its work force.

          The Hindu is the pay master of India.

          It knows that the Indians need food and water only.

          However, the salaries could be, and must be, doubled.

          The work force also could be doubled.

          This is to utilize, at least, a portion of the unutilized money.

          The money extracted for imports must appear in the Union Budget.

          At least the trade deficit must appear in the budget.

          If the current trade deficit is, say, $10 billion per month, about Re.70,000 crore more could be spent every month.

          Assume that the Indians do not import anything.

          Then, the money circulation would depend on the remittances and the income from exports.

          When the Indians import something, the money must go to the Union Government.

          The government, in turn, would release the foreign exchange.

          If the Supreme Court of India is ready to give Freedom today, the people- the learned judges of the Supreme Court included- would get the pay tomorrow.

          As it is not ready for it, it must strive to have an open mind.

          Then the government would give a reply in an understandable way.

This is letter No.419.

 This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 8 -9- 2015

8-9--2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India    

          

418. THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: GRABBING ITS CASH-BOX?

418

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA;

GRABBING ITS CASH-BOX?

          The Union Cabinet, on 1 September 2015, resolved to auction 69 oil fields on revenue sharing basis.

          This work shows that this is unconstitutional.

          Freedom alone would prevent it.

          However, the government said that this would unlock the hydrocarbon reserves.

          The policy of the ruling class is that either they should consume the public resources or nobody shall touch it.

          Thus, the Provident Fund (PF) remained stagnant until they devised a way to remove it.

          Similarly, nobody can touch the natural resources until they lay their hand on them.

          They, in turn, protect the system.

          Some pay tribute to the political leaders.

          Some political leaders consider the income from the natural resources as their own property income.

          The Supreme Court of India considers this as a policy decision of the government.

If some low born people lay their hand on them, the court sends them to jail.

It is like the temple deity grabbing his own cash-box.

This is letter No.418.

 This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 3 -9- 2015

3-9--2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India    

417: THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA: WHAT IS HIS AIM?

417

THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA:

WHAT IS HIS AIM?

          The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), filed the First Information Report (FIR) against former union minister Sachin Pilot, former Chief Minister of Rajastan Ashok Gehlot, Mr Ravi Krishna, son of former Union Minister Mr. Vayalar Ravi, Mr. Karthi Chithambaram, son of former Union Minister Mr. P. Chithambaram, and 4 others for a corruption of Re.2.5 crore while buying 108 ambulances in 2013.

          On the face of it, the above accused must have indulged in many other manipulations. Naturally, they must have huge disproportionate assets.

          Such assets might be confiscated.

          However, this is a complex case.

          Corruption is associated with all bulk buying.

          Every government indulges in bulk buying.

          The motive is big commission.

          Therefore, as early as in 2001, the present man requested the Supreme Court of India, to abolish the policy of bulk buying.

          The court described these as a policy decision.

          It did not allow the people to hear the suggestions.

          It even hid the complaints.

          Even today, it is not ready to open them for public discussion.

          Naturally, the court would finally acquit them.

          Therefore, unless otherwise denied, the court must be the first accused.

         

         

          Union Minister for Finance Mr. Arun Jaitely, on 30 August 2015, said that if the best do not join the Bench that itself creates pressure and handicaps the system.

          This is the predicament of the Supreme Court.

          He says that the judges selected under the collegiums system are not the best.

          It must be noted that the collegiums system does not permit the Chief Justice of India to select his son.

          Therefore,  both the collegiums system as well as the National Judicial Appointment Commission (NJAC) Act are arbitrary and illegal.

Though mark sheet is not the sole index of merit, written examination, as in other areas, is inevitable for mass recruitment.

          Whether any of your relation is working in the department? Such questions should not be directly or indirectly elicited from the candidates to disqualify them.

          It is a human rights problem.

          Mr. Jaitely finally quoted, “When in doubt, please go straight. A moral position is a lasting one”.

          Apparently, he wants to survive in an atmosphere of Freedom.

          He exhorts the judges to go in a straightforward way.

He urges them to take a moral stand.

          The ball is in the court of the Chief Justice of India.

          There is no reason to disregard the well-meant counsel of Mr.Jaitely.

He shall not hesitate to disclose his aim.

He must display his erudition now.

This is letter No.417.

 This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 1 -9- 2015

1-9--2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India