Saturday, August 3, 2013

226. Supreme Court of India - The New Stand

226


THE NEW STAND


         The last mail was submitted to His Excellency the President of India on 20 July 2013. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court of India, Indian Army and Indian Air Force.   Later, it was sent through post to the President of India and the Chief Justice of India; and posted in the blog www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com

      The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), on 22 July 2013, started to scrutinise over 3000 non-banking financial companies.
   Thus, the RBI has started to obey this writer. The people must know it.
      The RBI must depute necessary number of officers to supervise every entity on a permanent basis. If it is not feasible of compliance, it must accept full responsibility for the public money.
   
  A 400 year old Rajput fort at Delhi was auctioned, on 21 July 2013, for Re.7 crore. The fort had been under the Maharaja of Alwar until it was taken over by the government in 1960.
    It is another sad day for India.
    The government must protect all old structures. Even the stone load carriers, old stone articles and the stone sheds present all over India must be protected on a war footing.

      The director of the CBI, Mr. Ranjit Sinha, conducted the marriage reception of his daughter on 21 July 2013. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Congress President Sonia Gandhi and many top political leaders attended the function.
    Chief Justice of India Sathasivam graced the function. All learned judges of the Supreme Court of India also might have stood in a long queue to register their presence.
      The reception defeated the one conducted by the chief of Sahara Company in terms of the dignitaries.
    How could an officer spend this much money?
     If invited, the students – out of fear- attend the marriage of their teachers. The director, CBI, should not place such constraints on the system.

   The Department of Income Tax, on 23 July 2013, raided 40 premises of Saravana Bhavan Rajagopal in the Tamil Nadu state.
   There are several bigger offenders.
    He has every right to equal treatment and the Chief Justice India has a duty to protect his constitutional rights.
    Therefore, competent officers must file an affidavit in the Supreme Court of India that the raids are being carried out from top to bottom in the “gravity of offence scale”.
   All raids now originate from the mind of the Chief Justice of India although the President of India is equally responsible.
    
   The media, on 23 July 2013, reported that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh would attend the UN General Assembly in September, 2013 and then visit Washington for a bilateral summit with the President of USA, Mr. Barrack Obama.
      On his way back, he must call on Her Highness Queen Elizabeth II partly to iron out the differences associated with the “Delhi Commonwealth Games” and partly to show that he has an honoured place in the world.
 
   Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on 25 July 2013, constituted a “Steering Group” to accelerate public investments. This Group would award contract works for 17 projects after September 2013.
    In this connection, it must be stated that all public savings must be used for public investments.
    If he had used the Re.3 lakh crore in the Provident Fund (PF) for public investments, the manufacturing sector would have seen unprecedented development.
     Thanks to greater economic activity, the people would have bought more gold than what the recipients of the PF had bought.
  
    Chief Justice Sathasivam, on 27 July 2013, advised the graduates in law that they should not allow money or fear to influence their decisions in life. He added that the true value of legal education was the ability to contribute to social welfare.
   The Chief Justice of India could either give Liberty, or take it away.
   He now takes away the Liberty by talking like this. Otherwise, why does he “fear” to talk after giving Liberty?

    A prominent leader of the BJP, Mr. Arun Jaitely, on 28 July 2013, said that the existing method of appointment of judges must be changed to attract the best talents.
   No advocate has rejected the offer to become a judge of the Supreme Court. Are they “a bad lot” just because of one or two observations? Why did he remain silent for over twelve years?
    He must elaborate his statement.

   A Supreme Court bench comprising Justices G. S. Singhvi and K.S. Radhakrishnan asked the CBI the reason for not taking action on the so-called Niira Radia tapes. The bench, further, said that action should have been without waiting for its order.
      The CBI had considered the Supreme Court as a part of the system as mentioned in letter No.220.
   The new stand shows that the Supreme Court does not want to be a part of the system.
     Further, the new stand makes the CBI an accused body.

     Another bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justices G.S. Singhuvi and Gopala Gowda wanted to know whether the Department of Income Tax informed the criminality of the conversation in the Niira Radia tapes to the CBI.
    If the bench really means what it says, the CBI would have to take action over the criminality mentioned in the letters and inform it to the people immediately.

   A bench of the Supreme Court comprising Chief Justice Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana P. Desai and Ranja Gogoi, on 29 July 2013, sent notices to the Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition filed by a Member of Parliament, Mr. Gurudas Dasgupta.
  As an MP, Mr. Dasgupta had allowed the sale of some Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) to the RIL. Does he accept the decline of Parliament now?
      
     The investigators of Income Tax, on 30 July 2013, raided 29 premises of Meenashi Amman Trust group educational institutions in the Tamil Nadu state.
     The above raid shows that there are many institutions with the attributes of the “SRM group of Institutions”.
    Therefore, all institutions should have been raided simultaneously.
   The raid over the SRM group might have alerted others to manipulate the documents.
   The government should have supervised the institutions as demanded by this writer. Action could have been taken based on the report of the supervisors. This would have prevented the uncontrolled discretion.
   Now, the competent authority must publish the method used to differentiate the SRM from the rest.

    The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), on 30 July 2013, wanted the Supreme Court to punish Sahara Chief Subrata Roy for contempt of court.
        The Supreme Court did not ask the government to run the Sahara Company. It did not order it to hand over the money - due to the fictitious account holders - into the treasury. In fact, the court does not talk about the real offence at all.
    Further, there must be many other companies with similar attributes
     Action must be taken against all offenders simultaneously.

   The Union Cabinet, on 1 August 2013, cleared the sale of 10 per cent shares of the public sector Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) for Re. 3840 crore.
    After causing economic deprivation of the order of $ 1 trillion in gold trade, the government wants a small amount by selling the PSUs.
    Whatever happened, the sale is unconstitutional because the government does not give freedom to the people to know this work.

     A report, on 1 August 2013, said that the depositors of the bankrupt SUS bank decided to start an agitation on 5 August 2013.
     Apparently, the RBI is contemplating an action based on this work. Otherwise, why do they take the matter to the street now?
    In this connection, it must be stated that the judges would not easily direct the government to take over  sick banks because they cannot function as receivers.
    It must be noted that the Receiver of the SUS bank – a judge- sold some properties. But many depositors did not get any refund.

   The ruling United Progressive Alliance (UPA), on 30 July 2013 decided to bifurcate Andra Pradesh state – Telingana and  Andra Pradesh.
   A state wise reservation of seats in the All India Examination would do immense benefit to the new Andra Pradesh state.

      BJP leader Shatrughan Sinha, on 2 August 2013, considered Mr. L.K. Advani as the best prime ministerial candidate of his party.
    Gujarat Chief Minister Mr. Narendra Modi has not appeared in any public meeting after the last letter.
     Now, Mr. L.K. Advani believes that there is nothing wrong in functioning as a political leader after taking away the Liberty of the people.

      The facts from 20 July 2013 to 2 August 2013 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India on 3 August 2013.
       The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India and the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force for necessary action.
V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Thattamkonam,Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167
Tamil Nadu State,
INDIA
Phone: 04651275520. Mobile: 9486214851
3 August 2013

For further reading visit:
1.www. vajpayee.blogspot.com
2.www. primeministervajpayee.blogspot.com
3.www.primeministerdevegowda.blogspot.com
4.www. storyofananthapadmanabhan.blogspot.com
6. www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com
Other blogs of this writer are:
1.  www. effectiveinorganicchemistry.blogspot.com
4.  www. mylife-sabarimuthu.blogspot.com





  




      

  
 



   

No comments: