268: Mr. NARENDRA MODI - LOOKING TOWARDS THE TRUTH?

268

Mr. NARENDRA MODI –  LOOKING TOWARDS THE TRUTH?

The last mail was submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India, Chief Justice of India, Indian Army, Indian Air Force and Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) on 22 July 2014.  Later, it was posted in the blog www. howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com

On 23 July 2014, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) attached the assets of Nava Bharath Power Projects Private Limited –a mining company- in connection with the coal case. The ED used the Money Laundering Act for this.

All miners have disproportionate assets. Why does Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi select one or two companies for punishment?

 

14 school going children were killed and many critically injured when a train rammed into a bus at an unmanned level crossing near Hyderabad on 24 July 2014.

Mr. Narendra Modi is not responsible for it.

But, if the system had used a fraction of the Provident Fund for public cause, the incident would not have occurred.

Therefore, the Prime Minister of India is responsible for it.

He should have, at least, issued a standing instruction to his officers to send a condolence message to the bereaved families immediately after such accidents.

The Union Cabinet, on 24 July 2014, approved 49 per cent Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in the insurance sector. Therefore, the management control must remain with Indian promoter.

In this connection, it must be stated that everyone owning companies in foreign countries says that he is a citizen of the world and not a citizen of India. He actually parks his income in other countries.

Therefore, the government must disclose the criterion used to classify a man as an Indian promoter.

 In a centre page article, on 25 July 2014, The New Indian Express said that the Union Government might terminate the Rafale deal with France.

No nation would import obsolete technology. The present man pointed out the stealth era in one line in Chapter 266. The media now wants to take credit for it. In fact, if the present writer had not opposed it, the article would not have appeared.

The Supreme Court of India, on 25 July 2014, appointed a special court to try coal case.

The above court has no moral or constitutional right to initiate any criminal proceedings against anyone before enforcing freedom of expression.

Union Finance Minister Mr. Arun Jaitely, on 25 July 2014, said that the lower taxes were aimed at savings for investments.

Like Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Mr. Arun Jaitely wants to use the public savings for private investments.

In this connection, it must be stated that Prime Minister Mr. Modi is not allowed to touch the Provident Fund.

The Pension Fund also has over Re.6 lakhs. What happened to this treasure? Does the new prime minister know this? Will the system allow him to look at it?

The media, on 26 July 2014, said that the Cabinet Committee for Economic Affairs (CCEA) had approved the sale of the residual shares of the Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) and the Bharat Aluminium Company Limited (BALCO). They also reported that the government had decided to sell 10 percent shares each of the public sector Steel Authority of India (SAIL) and the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL).

The government privatized the HZL and the BALCO in violation of its guidelines mentioned in Chapter 1. The Supreme Court of India has not taken any action because Indians are slaves. Sardar Vallabai Patel like image of former Prime Minister of India Mr.A.B. Vajpayee, at that time, allowed him to act in bad faith.

Now, Prime Minister of India Mr. Modi would approve it if he believes that he has the Freedom to take away the properties of his “downtrodden”.

This is letter No.268.

It may be recalled that in a speech delivered at New Delhi, on 31 October 1949, the then Home Minister of India, Sardar Vallabai Patel, said,   

     “People, both from within and outside the Congress are criticizing us. Some go to the extent of saying that the British rule was better. This is unfortunate because when we think like this, we show a preference for slavery”.

          Evidently, some leaders even within Congress felt that British rule was better than the rule by the founders of the Nation.

          Sardar Vallabai Patel described them as “people”.

Who were those people? Why did they tell that the British rule had been better? Did they not talk in national interest?

          Are the people not entitled to know their names? Why did the founders treat their rivals in this manner?

          This happened because they suppressed the views of their rivals with greater intensity than the British.

 Is it not denial of freedom of expression?

Did they not enslave Indians?

Alas! Their statues can be seen all over India!    

India needs another breed of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patels to achieve Freedom.

            Mr. Modi had been talking daily before the election. Even after the election he had been talking for a few days. Since the letter No.265, he has been maintaining a studied silence. This disappoints the people all over India.

 Will he, at least, look towards the truth?

The  facts from 22 July 2014 to 26 July 2014  are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Prime Minister of India Chief Justice of India, chiefs of the Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, some High Courts and Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC)  on 27 July 2014.

       V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167

Tamil Nadu State, INDIA

27 July 2014