442
THE
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:
THE
PREEXISTENT LAW
There
are reports that some unidentified people consumed foreign exchange to the tune
of Re.6100 crore in the pretext of imports. The
money went to Hong Kong through the Bank
of Baroda.
The
revelation is consistent with the suspicion expressed by the present man that
the foreign exchange is being siphoned off illegally.
This
must be the tip of the iceberg of financial mismanagement. This does not mean
that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) must conceal similar illegal transactions.
The Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) asked the Central
Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to probe the matter.
The
CBI distorted the facts in the 2G case.Therefore, this agency cannot be trusted
for such probes.
According
to some reports, the government recently decided to alienate the properties of
the Light Houses across the country under the pretext of public –private
partnership (PPP). This is to make them tourist destinations.
The
decision is an unconstitutional one. The reasons were given earlier.
The
government can easily convert them into tourist destinations.
The
2G judgement made the BALCO judgement
null and void. The economic policy can be now reviewed by the court.
Evidently,
the Supreme Court of India induces the government to alienate the public assets
without the support of any law.
As
there is no Freedom, the court can do anything.
The
people cannot own property in China. It does not consider this as an impediment
for growth.
There
is very little property in the hand of the Government of India.
Yet
it wants to transmit them to the private parties!
According
to another report, the government decided to sell the IDBI Bank.
Accordingly,
the government would sell 30 percent shares to a private company close to the
prime minister.
The
government has enlisted the support of the trade unions with the help of the
Left Parties for this..
This
is also an unconstitutional decision. The reasons were given earlier.
The
IDBI bank is the only bank established by the government through an Act of
Parliament.
It
cannot be alienated in bad faith.
The
government does this with the tacit support of the Supreme Court of India.
Therefore,
the people cannot do anything other than writing like this.
Addressing
an election meeting, Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi, on 25 October 2015, said that he became the
Prime Minister of India because of Babasaheb
Ambedkar.
He
illegally handed over the spectrum, coal and the defence industries to his
promoters within a span of one year.
He
actively takes necessary steps to hand over the IDBI bank and the properties of
the Light Houses to them.
He
bestows them with many other favours
secretly.
He
does everything in bad faith that too by denying Freedom.
Will
not the children consider him as a hired
man of the manipulators?
Addressing
another public meeting, he described himself as a protector of the backward
class. He said that he would join with Mr.
Lalu Prasad Yadav to fight for reservation.
He
had enacted a law for the selection of judges. The law did not provide for
reservation. The law is now void is a different matter.
He
did not ask the Supreme Court of India to follow reservation rules or to allot
a definite quota of seats for every state while appointing judges.
Similarly,
neither did he ask the banks to follow the rules of reservation nor did he restore the Banking Service Recruitment Commission.
Yet
he talks like this!
Addressing
another public meeting, he said that he was selling tea in trains in his
childhood.
The
tea makers listen to many people. They do not know that they have no Freedom.
Yet,
their degree of awareness is greater than his.
They
are not likely to act in bad faith.
If
this conclusion is not a correct one, he deceives the people.
On
25 October 2015, THE NEW INDIAN EXPRESS, in a special front page
article by its writer- Gurumurthy, said
that the Central Bureau of Investigation
(CBI) did a ‘thoroughly dishonest’ probe at the instance of the Supreme
Court of India. It quoted the following from Justice Jackson. “Judges are more often bribed by their ambition
and loyalty than by money”.
A
point that has been dark till now becomes clear. The national newspapers can
accuse the Supreme Court of India of dishonesty!
If
the court is ready to grant Freedom to the people to see this work today, it
will cease to hear such words tomorrow. Yet it is not ready to grant it.
Now,
if the court is dishonest in one case, could it be honest in another case?
The
court alone can give an answer.
A
Mr. Prakash Singh said that the
courts must search for truth. He described this as its duty. He said that Malimath Committee suggested ‘quest for
truth’ to be the guiding star of the entire criminal justice system. He added
that the court could issue any direction to the investigation officers to assist it in its search for truth.
THE
NEW INDIAN EXPRESS published this on 25 October 2015.
The
above paper is wedded to strange this work. Chapter 14 of the blog www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.
blogspot.com shows this. Now it talks about truth!
Retired
High Court Judge K.Chandru, on the
same day, said that the judges weave their personal view points. He added that
some actions of the judges are legally improper.
A Ms.
Sudha Ramalingam said that the courts overstep the boundaries of law.
Citing
a case, THE HINDU, in its editorial, on 27 October 2015, described the suggestion of a judge as a barbaric one.
Apparently,
the paper said this to exert pressure on the Chief Justice of India to induct as
many nominees of the ruling class as
possible in the High Courts before November 3, 2015- the date fixed by the
court to hear the suggestions for appointing judges.
President
of India Mr. Pranab Mukherjee, on 26
October 2015, appointed 22 judges in various High Courts. The collegiums did
not even call for an application. No law was followed- no advertisement for the
post, no minimum qualification, no reservation, no interview or any other
criterion.
These
appointments are out and out illegal.
Illegally
appointed judges alone would do this.
The
NJAC bench could have even initiated contempt proceedings against the members
of the collegiums.
The
senior judges could have appointed over 300 judges in one go. However, they
have done enough for the day.
The
people are born equally subject to a preexistent law.
The
judges are not aware of this sacred law. How will they judge men and matters?
If
the children know this point, they would- in one voice- ask the judges to quit
the court.
Therefore,
the tendency of the judges would be to strange this work as effectively as
before.
Now
the media is accusing the judges of dishonesty.
The
judges allow the people to hear it.
But
they do not allow them to hear valid legal points.
The preexistent law existed before the
enactment of the Constitution of India.
The
law is that no man shall do anything illegal.
The
Chief Justice of India cannot be above this immutable law.
This is letter No.442.
This email
is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of
India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and
posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 29-10- 2015
29-10--2015.
V. Sabarimuthu,
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.
Mobile: 9486214851
