433
THE
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:
EXCEEDING
ITS AUTHORITY?
Union Finance Minister Mr. Arun Jaitely, on 2 October 2015,
said that 638 individuals availed themselves of the one-time window for
disclosing black money. They declared Re. 3770 crore before 30-9-2915, the
deadline.
An advocate of the Madras High Court,
on 2 October 2015, said that some people - devoid of any court experience -
were inducted as judges. He added that justice cannot be expected from them.
Is it true?
The Supreme Court of India or the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI)
must accept or rebut his statement.
The
(CBI), on 2 October 2015, questioned former Chief Minister of Utter Pradesh
Miss. Mayawati in connection with the
National Rural Health Mission (NRHM)
case.
The CBI alleged that 100 District
Project Officers (DPO) were instrumental in the alleged corruption. It said
that the DPO posts were specifically created for this.
The
Public Service Commission (PSC) might have selected the DPOs.
Yet, the CBI says that they were
instrumental for the corruption.
The learned judges of the Supreme
Court of India are - till date - selected by simple hand picking.
They are instrumental for bigger acts
of corruption.
No minimum qualification. No authority
to check the certificates of the selected candidates. No minimum experience.
Why are they selected like this?
The reason is simple.
Such judges alone would transfer the
public resources to private parties by denying Freedom.
The Supreme Court of India could have
done anything after discharging its duty.
But it exercises its power without
doing its duty.
Thus it exceeds its authority.
This is letter No.433.
This email is being submitted to
His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance
Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the
blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 3-10- 2015
3-10--2015.
V. Sabarimuthu,
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode,
Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.
No comments:
Post a Comment