From
V.
Sabarimuthu
26-3
Vellicode
Mulagumoodu
P.O.
India
To
The
President of India
New
Delhi
Your
Excellency
The
last letter was submitted to the President of India and the Supreme Court of
India through email on 26 February 2019 at 1 P.M.
Next
day, the Indian media said that two Indian fighter jets had to cross the border
to chase two intruding Pakistani F16 fighter jets. In the dogfight that ensued,
Pakistan downed an Indian MiG 21 in its territory and captured its pilot. India
recovered AMRAAM anti air to air missiles that can be used only on the F-16.
‘Pakistan
teaches India a lesson’, ‘Dastardly Pakistan’, ‘Stay calm and back India’, and
‘Use missiles and strike back’ are some of the war monkeying comments of the
Indian TV channels. Rajini Vaidyanathan of the BBC said that the very thought
of challenging the official version was the equivalent of being anti-national
in India.
Instantly,
India decided to attack Pakistan. Many airports were shut down. Indian army
crossed the border in many places.
Addressing
a meeting in Delhi, on 27 February 2019, Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra
Modi disclosed that he had granted power to the armed forces to retaliate.
While
he was talking like this, an officer handed over a paper to him. Mr. Modi went
through the paper. He did not utter any words after that and returned. One or
two TV channels reported it instantly. He might have met the President of
India. But the media did not report it. He had some meetings with the Union
Cabinet and with the chiefs of the armed forces. One or two TV channels
instantly reported it. After that, India decided to de-escalate the tensions
and the airports were opened. One or two TV channels murmured it.
What
is the reason for the revulsion?
The
President of India - the Supreme Commander of the armed forces - this time, was
very alert to act on the last letter – the letter No.711 dated 26 -2-2019. He
firmly asked Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi to unilaterally de-escalate the
tensions forthwith and the latter was left with no other alternative.
However,
what the present man knows is his last letter and the above developments. The
President of India alone knows the other things that happened on the eventful
day.
Thus,
the present man rescued Indian and Pakistan from perdition.
Though
India lost the dogfight to a superior aircraft, India won the war on 27
February 2019.
If
the present man can lead India latently like this without the support of the
people, why can’t he lead the nation patently with the support of the people?
Everyone would tell that the present man was the only man in India to strike a
discordant note at the moment of maximum danger under Prime Minister Mr. Modi.
For
this, the Supreme Court of India must adjudicate this letter. The people must
know its award. What is the use in asking the people to stand in long queues to
vote for Prime Minister Mr. Modi or Mr. Rahul Gandhi before allowing them to
know this? What is the difference between them? If the ruling class asks Mr. Modi
to take a break, Mr. Rahul Ganghi would win. Otherwise, Mr. Modi would win.
The
media did not immediately report the decision taken by India to de-escalate the
tensions. To face India, the airports in Pakistan had been under shut down for
three days. But Prime Minister of Pakistan wanted to avert a war. Therefore, he
said, “After the Pulmava attack, I made
an offer to India that we were ready for any type of investigation they wanted.
They suffered casualties in Pulwama and I know how distressed the families must
have been because we have had around 70,000 casualties over the past ten years.
I have been to many hospitals over the past ten years and have seen bomb blast
victims, some with no legs, some with no arms. They cannot walk, some cannot
see. I know how families of those who have passed away and those who have
injured feel. That is why we made a straight offer to India for whatever type
of investigation they wanted. If any Pakistani is found to be involved,
Pakistan is ready to co-operate with you fully. We said this because it is not
in the interest of Pakistan. Therefore, we were ready for total co-operation.
There is no dispute in this.
But I had the misgiving that, despite
all these, India would take some sort of action. That is why I told them that
if they took any action, we would be compelled to respond. No sovereign country
can allow another to decide that a country has committed a crime, to become a
judge, jury and executionary and carry out such activities on its soil. I had
these misgivings because there are elections in India and I felt that because
of this, some kind of action would be taken.
Therefore, I told India that we would
have to retaliate. So, when the action was taken by India yesterday, I had
talks with the army chiefs and the air force chief. We did not take action in
the morning because there was no complete information about what damage we had
suffered. We knew that it would have been very irresponsible on the part of
Pakistan to take action if we had not suffered any casualties ourselves. That
is why we waited and took action today. It was our plan, that there should be no
collateral damage, no casualties. We
only want to tell India that we have the capability, if you come and carry out
an activity on our land, we can also come over and do the same in your land.
In retaliation to Pakistan, two
Indian MiG 21 fighter jets crossed the Pakistan border. They were shot down. I
also want to say that the pilots are with us. The problem is where do we go
from here. This is very important. I am now addressing India, it is very
important at this stage that we use wisdom and insight.
There were miscalculations in all the
big wars in the world. No one realized where the war started would lead.
The First World War was supposed to
end in in a month. It took six years.
In the Second World War, Hitler
thought he would conquer Russia. But he had not realized that it would be
delayed until the Russian winter and he was destroyed.
Did America ever believe that they
would get struck in Afghanistan for 17 years? Did it ever believe that the
Vietnam War would go that far?
World history tells us that there
were miscalculations in wars.
But my question to the Indian
Government is, given the arms that we and you have, can we afford any
miscalculation. Should we not be thinking that if this escalates, were will it
lead to? It will neither be in my control nor in the control of Mr. Narendra
Modi. That is why we once again invite you to talks. We are ready. We told you
that if you want any type of dialogue on your Palwama Tragedy which has caused
you distress or on terrorism, we are ready. But I will tell you, again, that,
at this time, better sense should prevail.
We should resolve our problems by
sitting down and talking.
Thank you.”
His
above talk won praise from the Pakistanis and the Indians. A minister in
Pakistan together with many signatories recommended Nobel Peace Prize to him.
If the people in India had known what the present man did, they might have
recommended him also for the same.
Russian
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrow offered to mediate as well as providing a venue
for talks between India and Pakistan. The Secretary General of the United
Nations offered his good offices for de-escalation. The USA, China, Saudi
Arabia and many other countries requested India and Pakistan to exercise maximum
restraint. None knew the fact that India took a unilateral decision to
de-escalate the tensions as early as on 27 February 2019.
When
the news of the de-escalation appeared in the media, Pakistan Prime Minister
Mr. Imran Khan, to total surprise of everyone, was very quick to hand over the
Indian pilot to India.
India
has not seen a civilian government in India in the last 20 years. Some say that
Prime Minister of Pakistan Mr. Imran Khan works under the order of the armed
forces of Pakistan. Some in India even say that many army officers in Pakistan
are businessmen. But, the fact that Mr. Imran Khan released the Indian pilot
within 48 hours of his arrest shows that he is heading a government with great
civilian character.
The
people all over the world had no clue about what happened between ‘retaliation’
and ‘de-escalation’. They simply rejected everything as a dark dream.
India’s Ambassador to Russia, on 2 March 2019,
said, “The situation is already stabilizing and stabilizing rather quickly”.
Prime
Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi, on 2 March 2019, said. “The entire country
is feeling the absence of Rafale fighter aircraft. The entire country is
saying, in one voice, today, what all could have happened if we had the Rafale.
The country has suffered a lot due to selfish interest earlier and now politics
over Rafale.
Thus,
Prime Minister Mr. Modi acknowledged that India, for the first time, suffered
defeat in the hand of Pakistan in an aerial clash.
In
this connection, it must be noted that the Supreme Court of India converted
India into a rogue country. In fact, India is the No.1 rogue nation in the
world. Therefore, the USA would continue to maintain the present balance of
power. It openly acknowledges this. If India buys the Rafale, the USA would
supply a better one to Pakistan. The fact that the USA distrusts Pakistan is a
different matter.
To
a question, Union Minister Mr. Arun Jaitely, on 2 March 2019, said, “We are
living in a world without complete information”.
Thus,
he indirectly said that the people would not know the repercussions of the last
letter.
Simultaneously,
Pakistan detained hundreds of militant people. It seized 182 schools. Its
actions inspire confidence although it is not ready to hand over some militant
people to India.
A
Mr. Amit Varma, in The Times of India,
on 3 March 2019, described the effect of the last letter on Prime Minister Mr.
Narendra Modi as follows. “One, strategy dictated that he must not escalate
because Pakistan in a nuclear power. Two, politics dictated that he must”
The
New York Times, on 5 March 2019, said India -Pakistan conflict was a parade of
lies. Apparently, it is aware of the last letter. However, the USA acknowledged
that there were a lot of private efforts behind de-escalation.
Speaking
at a public function, on 5 March 2019, Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra
Modi, among other things, said,
“The opposition is trying strike me
while I am trying to strike terrorism.
Some people are criticizing me. They
are free to criticize me but their anti-Modi tirade should not help terrorists
like Masood Azar and Hafiz Saeed.
One challenge before the country is
that some people are opposing their own country. When the entire nation is
standing with the armed forces, some people are casting doubts on them.
Is this the way you are serving the
national interest? You may question me on my policies. You may not trust me,
but at least trust the armed forces. Don’t raise questions over their valour.
It is ‘my nature’ to give a fitting
reply. We will enter their homes and eliminate them. Even if they hide deep
under the Earth, we will drag them out and eliminate them.
It is our policy to hit enemies
inside their territory. I don’t want to wait for long.
Some say that the driving force
behind my action is the coming election. Was there any election when I
conducted the surgical strike for the first time?
We have been affected by the
terrorism for the last 40 years. I don’t care for power. I am only concerned
about my country’s security.
India’s unity has scared many within
the country and outside. I can say with full confidence that the 21st century
belongs to India”.
What
Prime Minister of Pakistan said must be compared with what Prime Minister of India
Mr. Narendra Modi said.
If
he is a very bold man, he could have entered the Supreme Court of India to
chase away the judges for denying freedom to Indians.
It
is customary for the Indian government to murder its soldiers for gain. Prime
Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi too wants to murder them for gain. He
utilized the Palwama terrorist attack to alienate not two but five air ports. This
violation against the Constitution is not the first of its kind committed by
his government. Article 39 prohibits this. Any violation must lead to restitution
and punishment. The people are entitled to compensatory damage also.
Further,
consistent with ‘his nature’ he pushed the armed forces to make another Godra
if not a full- scale war. In the Godra violence, the court punished a top
lieutenant of Mr. Modi. In the present issue, his top lieutenants did not stand
by him. They did not get the critical energy badly needed to defy the letter of
the present absent class citizen. He could strange this work until the last day
last minute in office. Yet, for a moment, India was under the civilian rule.
His
prime ministership now reminds ‘Blue Jackal’ story.
Further,
the language of the Prime Minister of India shows that India and Pakistan must
debate the question of abandoning the nuclear devices.
On
7 March 2019, the Supreme Court of India bench comprising Chief Justice of
India Ranjan Gogoi and justices SA. Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Asok Bhusan and SA.
Nazeer appointed a three-member panel- spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravishankar and
senior advocate Sriram Panchu as members and former judge of the Supreme Court
of India FM. Kalifullah as the chairman - to mediate the Ayodhya dispute.
The
parties must have voluntarily chosen an impartial judge for mediation. They must
have agreed in advance to accept as final and binding the decision taken based
on the merits of the case.
However,
the standard method is ‘a panel comprising three impartial and intelligent men
known for their probity and understanding, two to be chosen by the disputants,
each having the choice of one and the third by those two. Three men thus chosen
shall declare their decision. Such decision is to all intent and purpose to be
as binding on the parties as if it had been given in the Supreme Court’.
In
the present case, the court -despite a few letters- has imposed its panel on
the disputants. It shows that the bench has an interest in the outcome. To do
justice, the judges require a fairly strict minimum standard. Otherwise, they
will not understand the utility of well-meant counsels
The
Election Commission of India declared the General Election schedule on 7 March
2019. The announcement shows that the Supreme Court of India and the President
of India ignored the demand of the present absent class citizen to defer the
election.
The
judges of the Supreme Court of India are expected to recognize the fundamental
principles of the constitutional law such as those concerning the elections
The
absent class citizens are prejudiced by the failure of the court to adjudicate
711 meritorious letters.
However,
it is the duty of the present man to inform the judges as fully as possible
about the issue they are expected to resolve.
Therefore,
it is imperative that the present absent class citizen must carefully analyse
and synthesize the important points of the letters and place them, once again,
before the judges to arrive at the ultimate conclusion.
The
newspapers had been publishing the views of the present man for nation building
till 1996. For instance, The Indian Express published several letters. They
suddenly stopped publishing letters. Therefore, letters were sent to the Prime
Minister of India, chief ministers, national leaders, Members of Parliament,
many members of State Assemblies. None revealed the contents to the people. This
led to the realization that the Indians have no freedom of expression.
Thus,
the present man approached the Supreme Court of India only after exhausting all
methods for achieving freedom to Indians.
Everyone
knows that the government cannot give employment to all and that private
initiatives must be encouraged for the prosperity of the nation. This does not
mean that Article 39 of the Constitution of India could be abridged by the
government or by the courts.
Thus,
as early as in 2001, the present man told the Supreme Court of India that it
broke the Constitution of India from within by saying that policy decisions
cannot be questioned by the court. The court should have adjudicated that
letter because adjudication is justice. The unusual silence of the court proved
that the Chief Justice of India stands for injustice and not for justice. Yet,
the dominant theme is the Article 19 of the Constitution of India.
The
judges of the Supreme Court take judicial notice of many widely known facts -
private disputes and even family problems. The subject of these letters belongs
to the general topic of judicial reasoning. But it involves a substantial
question of law. The Constitution of India has delegated sufficient authority
to the Supreme Court of India to remedy the grievances that involve broad
question of policy or constitutional interpretation.
The
present man said that commonly accepted meaning or the ordinary dictionary
meaning of the words - ‘democracy’ and ‘freedom of expression’ - must be taken.
Then it was pointed out that the restrictive clauses cannot undo the main
clauses.
The
rich and the vociferous sections do not require the protection of the Supreme
Court of India to seize power. They seize power using money power that includes
their power to suppress the voice of the 1300 million absent class citizens.
But the voiceless absent class citizens need the protection of the court to
assert their constitutional rights.
But
court does the opposite now. It shields the rich and deny the rights of the
absent class citizens through its refusal to process the grievances. The people
are being forced to elect the mediocrity if not the criminals. This affects the
governance of the nation. The things that happened after the Pulwama attack is
a quintessence for this.
The
present absent class citizen tried his level best to be heard. The media
disqualified everything. The present man
published his work through books. At least seven books deal with the
rights, duties and responsibilities of the citizens, courts and the President
of India. The books such as ‘The Pranab Effects’, ‘We Will Strange You’. ‘Chief
Justice Rangan Gogoi’ are examples. But the rich and the powerful keep these
books away from the eye of the people even in this electronic age.
The
present man demanded the detention of the Union Cabinet Ministers. As they have
violated the constitution of India for unjust enrichment, a penalty in the form
of detention for four months prior to the election is a reasonable one. In the
present situation, the ends of justice are defeated or unconscionably denied
because they knowingly and repeatedly violated the constitutional provisions.
The good faith of the Cabinet Ministers cannot be applied because the absent
class citizens have suffered great loss from the violations of the
Constitution.
The
President of India has no authority to waive the strict performance of the Article
19 of the Constitution of India. He simply failed to realize the ramification
of the of the Article 19 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, one would say
that it is not the unilateral mistake of the Supreme Court of India but a
mutual mistake of the Supreme Court of India and the President of India. They
mutually dissipated the Constitutional benefits of the citizens. If it is due
to their lack of understanding of the Constitution of India, they should not
hesitate to take remedial measures now.
This
is letter No.712
This
letter is being submitted to the President of India. The same letter is sent to
the Supreme Court of India also.
V.
Sabarimuthu
India
17
– 3-2019
