184 Seeking the Prosecution of President Pratibha Devisingh Patil

184

           FALSE VALUES AND DELUSIVE WORDS

The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 21 August 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC)   and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai and Culcutta High Courts.  It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

          In the “money – for - vote case”   Amar Singh and three other Members of Parliament (MPs) belonging to the BJP party were charge – sheeted on 24 August 2011. The accused were not arrested.

         In the above case, the Delhi police did not disclose the identity of the real donor of money.

        It must be noted that a tape recorded conversation had depicted Amar Singh as a representative of the big industrial houses.

        Therefore, the Supreme Court must direct the Delhi Police to identify the real donor of money, lest the people would consider the learned judges of the Supreme Court as conspirators. It shall not hesitate to dispel the darkness from the mind of the people in this matter.

         

         12 militant people and an Army officer were killed in a gun battle in the Jammu & Kashmir State on 24 August 2011.

          Mr. A. Raja, former Telecom Minister, told Trial Court Judge O.P. Saini, that the media - instead of acting as an asylum for the society –turned into a slaughter house in his matter. He told the judge that he had been paying the price for annoying a cartel of telecom firms. He added that he was facing the music for enforcing one time spectrum charge beyond 6.2 MHZ.

          The Supreme Court, on 26 August 2011, banned iron ore mining in two more districts of the Karnataka State. The people fear that the Supreme Court is trying to hand over iron ore mining to the POSCO or to one of the “eight men” in charge of running the country.

         

          Human Resource Development Minister Kapil Sibal, on 26 August 2011, said that the Government had no proposal to enforce a uniform school education curriculum. This is, apparently, his reply to the last mail submitted to President Pratibha Patil.

          Minister Kapil Sibal, and therefore the Union Government, could have looked into this matter in the proper perspective.

          The students must have the freedom to study anything they want.

      But, the all India examinations - like the one conducted by the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT-JEE) - must be based on a uniform syllabus. All students all over India must be given a chance to study it. No out-of -syllabus question shall be asked. There must be a competent authority to check it. If the Government refuses to listen to this feeble voice, what will the ignorant people do?

          Further, the children find English very difficult only when it is introduced to them in the later classes. If it is taught in the pre LKC or LKC level, they will simply follow their teachers. The only condition is that orientation courses and refresher courses must be continuously conducted for the teachers.

          Supreme Court judge Markandey Katju, on 27 August 2011, wanted the judiciary to interpret the Constitution of India in such a way so that the nation would move into the modern age.

          Justice Katju would ignore the act of receiving commission for converting India into a vassal of China. He would not consider the act of giving Re. 3 lakh crore Provident Fund (PF) money to three boys as an act of corruption.    

          A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice Chandramauli Kumar dismissed the plea - of the former Chief Justice of Sikkim High Court, Dinakaran - that challenged the decision of a committee appointed by the Upper House.

          In this connection, it must be reiterated that many key cases of the Supreme Court go into the hand of Justice Singhvi. One half of the sitting judges of the Supreme Court are even now unknown to the people.

          Though it is a digression, it must be stated that a court in Pakistan ordered the confiscation of the property of the former President of Pakistan, Pervez Musharraf, for his failure to appear before it. In India, Mr. Ramalinga Raju was divested of his properties even without the intervention of the courts.

Further, the judges in India also possess great power. A Union Cabinet Minister is in jail. At the same time, even people charged under the Official Secret Act did not appear in any court!

      

          Conceding the demands of Anna Hazare, the Indian Parliament, on 27 August 2011, unanimously passed a resolution to enact a new Anti-corruption Act called Lok Pal. He ended his 13 - day fast on 28 August 2011.

          The people all over India find the Union Government weak. They think that corruption is stalking the nation.

      Many people still believe that former Telecom Minister Raja removed over Re. 1 lakh crore in the 2G spectrum allotment. They think that he would escape from the court because of the weakness of the Constitution of India.

       Some people believe that corruption in the lower level must be checked.

Some others attribute their sufferings to corruption in the highest level.

However, as ignorance governs their mind and tongue, they are unable to pin point any act of corruption.  

When Anna Hazare announced his decision to undertake a fast against corruption, the TV channels started giving great publicity to his words. The newspapers had been coming out with headline news about his fast. The people marveled at his ability to catch the attention of the downtrodden. Seldom they realized the fact that “the eight men” responsible for running the country were behind him.

When he started the fast, the people simply found their saviour in Anna Hazare. They considered him the modern day Gandhiji. They - in large numbers - came out of their house in support of his cause. They simply rocked Delhi for thirteen days.

The actors like Vijay, Amir Khan called on Anna Hazare. Students all over India came out of the classes. Processions were taken by the employees and others. Some undertook parallel fasting.

 Army Chief V.K. Singh described the agitation as the power of the people.

The agitation was reminiscent of the freedom struggle.

After breaking the fast, Anna Hazare described his movement as an example for the world. He said that the power of the people was greater than that of the Parliament. He considered it as a victory for India. He thanked the people and the media for making his fast a success.

Some said that the new Act would extirpate corruption and create a corruption- free India.

Some others said that all leaders in India were not cheats.

Some praised the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

If an election were conducted to-day, Anna Hazare would secure-at least- a simple majority in the Parliament. This shows that “the eight men” decide the destiny of the nation through their media wing.

If the proposal of Anna Hazare were translated into an Act of Parliament, the law enforcing agencies would have to get an order of a seven member Competent Committee, even, to investigate the acts of corruption of the Prime Minister of India.

Obviously, the avowed object of the Act is to protect the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and President Pratibha Devisingh Patil from the corruption charges leveled against them by the present writer (and others).

In contrast,  now any mere knowledge about the acts of corruption - that are officially allowed - will be sufficient for the President, Governors and the learned judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts to take deterrent measures. One would say that they connived at 183 letters from this writer. Surely, the mentally corrupt persons alone would have thrown the letters into the dust bin. All the rest must have taken one action or other.

There were five important adherents to Anna Hazare  - two bad actors of the Supreme Court known for the Re.4 crore, two people described as social activists - Ms. Kiran Bedi and Mr. Arvind Kejriwal and an unconscious actor called N.Santosh Hegde,  former judge of the Supreme Court.

Santosh Hegde received hundreds of letters of this writer during his stint in the Supreme Court. Therefore, he might have conveyed the various acts of corruption to Anna Hazare and others.

If Anna Hazare had told something about the method of utilization of the Re.3 lakh crore in the PF account, the crowd would have virtually thrown the President, MPs and the learned judges of the Supreme Court into the Indian Ocean. This did not happen.

Further, a five - judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court under Santosh Hegde on 5 November 2004 granted permission to the Governors to act independently in corruption matters. The present writer pointed out this in the last letter. He might have got scent of this. Since then, he was conspicuous by his absence in the team of Anna Hazare.

However, when the fast came to an end, he reappeared to express his happiness. Nietzsche says that false values and delusive words are the worst monsters for mortals.

After Anna Hazare had ended his fast, the Union Government decided to sell the shares of the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs)

In this connection, it must be stated that the President of India is not only the Supreme Commander of the armed forces but also the custodian of the wealth of the nation.

Therefore, it is the paramount duty of the President to prevent big acts of corruption. It is not necessary that someone must send 183 letters for this. The President might get a piece of information from newspapers, TV channels, any citizen or even the last grade servant in the Presidential Palace. The President must confidentially ascertain the veracity of such pieces of information from the Prime Minister. Then, the President must disclose it to the nation. Naturally, criminal prosecution will follow.

Here, the President Pratibha Devisingh Patil supported the acts of corruption by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. As a result Re. 3 lakh crore from the PF secretly went in the hands of three boys.

If the recipients had traded in gold, they would have converted it into Re. 9 lakh crore in three years. Naturally about Re. 3 to 6 lakh crore remains in their hand as black money.

In this matter, President Pratibha Devisingh Patil – just like Manmohan Singh and Santosh Hedge - uses delusive words.  She is not ready to take action –consistent with the Constitution of India- against Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

Evidently, she could have chosen to steal Re.100 lakh crore rather than accepting the post of the President of India.

Therefore, the Chief Justice of India is requested to grant permission to this writer to prosecute President Pratibha Devisingh Patil for the corruption in the Re. 3 lakh crore  PF money. A copy of this letter is submitted to him through post for this.

The Chief Justice of India is requested to treat this as a formal letter.

         The facts from 21 August 2011 to 28 August 2011 are being submitted to Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 29 August 2011.

          The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India, the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner and the Chief Justices of some High Courts for necessary action.

V.Sabarimuthu.

26-3 Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. PIN:629167

Kanyakumari District

 

183 President Pratibha Patil -Prosecution

183

President Pratibha Devisingh Patil

      The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 8 August 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court, Indian Army and Indian Air Force. Signed xerox copies were sent by post to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC)   and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai and Culcutta High Courts.  It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

            A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice H.L. Dattu, on 9 August 2011, issued notice to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on the petition by Mr. Sanjay Chandra of Unitech  and Vinod Goenka of Reality seeking bail in the 2G Spectrum case. They were represented by senior counsels Ram Jethmalani and Mukul Rohtagi. The petitioners said that their freedom - granted under article 21 of the Constitution- was being violated.

          Justice A.K. Ganguly and Justice G.S. Singhvi had been hearing the above case. Now, Justice A.K. Ganguly has been substituted by Justice H.L. Dattu.  He might have expressed his reluctance to sit with Justice G.S.Singhvi. This is the first time the Supreme Court is encountering such a problem. This is the observation of the people sitting away from the Supreme Court.

          A three - judge bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justices J.M. Panchal, Deepak Varma and B.S. Chauhan, on 9 August 2011, upheld the decision of the Chennai High Court on the Uniform System of Education Act (USEA) implemented by the DMK Government in the Tamil Nadu State. The court said that the Act was to impart quality education without any discrimination –economic, social or cultural. Chief Minister Jayalalitha agreed to implement the order.

          Even after the implementation of the above Act, the standard of education will vary from English medium schools to Tamil medium schools. It will also continue to be a function of the social and economic condition of the students and the standard of the teachers.

          Notwithstanding the above, the students will now start the race – at least theoretically - from the same line. The learned judges in the bench must be commended for this.

          Now, if the Supreme Court wants, the distinction between the central syllabus and the state syllabus will be removed.

          The Tamil Nadu pattern of education allows the students to study a third language in the Plus II level or collegiate level. This automatically solves the language problem.

          It is pertinent to recall that the present writer –through the columns of The New Indian Express – had requested the Government to remove the distinction between the English medium schools, and the Tamil medium schools. Besides, the Government had been requested to teach English to all students from the LKG onwards. The New Indian Express –Madurai edition- published the letter in a box in its issue dated 1-2-2000.

Whatever happened,  Chief Minister Karunanidhi immediately said that he could not ignore Tamil. Disappointed by his words, the present writer left the matter there.

However, if the developments in the last ten years were based on that letter, one would say that Dr. M. Karunanidhi occasionally gives precedence to the views of the public over the views of his children. He alone could accept or deny this conclusion. However, in the context of Tamil Nadu, it is a great change indeed.   

Now, the present writer is teaching General English to all students from Std -I to Std-VIII in the Tamil medium school at Vellicode purely on voluntary basis. Special care is taken to speak English only.

It is surprising to note that even the students of Std-I expect the present writer to talk in English. Even the children of coolies seem to understand English better than Tamil or Malayalam. They really wish to talk in English!

The Supreme Court, educationalists, psychologists and the experts in the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) could experimentally verify the correctness or otherwise of the above observation. If the inference is a positive one, a Uniform System of Education could be implemented all over India.    

          The Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, on 9-8- 2011, approved two year extension to Mr. D. Subbarao, Governor, Reserve Bank of India. This is the reward for helping Manmohan singh to transmit Re.3 lakh crore from the Provident Fund (PF) to three parties. In this matter, Subbarao is liable for prosecution.

          In contrast, Mr. TS Vijayan, Chairman, LIC, did not get extension presumably because he disclosed the amount invested by the LIC in shares. He had two more years left to his retirement.

          The CBI, on 9 August 2011, decided to seek the co-operation of the Maxis Company to probe the alleged forced sale of shares from the Aircel Company to it. In this matter, the people think that there exists a truce between the NDTV and the SUN TV. During such periods, the CBI – usually- does not act.

          A five - judge Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia, Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan, Mukudan Sharma, Swatanter Kumar and Anil Dave, on 10 August 2011, said that a state can deprive a person of his private property only for a public purpose. They said that any act of acquiring land for private purpose would undermine the rule of law. They wanted the foreign investors to know the fact that rule of law prevailed in India.

          The properties acquired for the National Textile Corporation (NTC) Mills have been sold to private parties in private interest. Those properties must be taken back or restored to the original owners to give a meaning to this judgment.

          Mr. A.Raja, former Telecom Minister, told the CBI Special Judge, O.P. Saini, on 12 August 2011, that he took oath to abide by the Constitution of India and not by the advice of  Prime Minister Manmohan Singh or erstwhile Finance Minister Chithambaram.

          In the above matter, it must be noted that  Prime Minister Vajpayee asked  Information Minister Arun Shourie to apportion the spectrum arbitrarily to his people. He did not allow anyone to lay down any rule or guideline. The so-called first-come –first - served policy did not enjoy the support of the Union Cabinet. Therefore, it was not the policy of the Government of India at all.

However, when Raja said that the spectrum had been apportioned like an ancestral property, the beneficiaries sent him to jail only to conserve their wealth.

         In the above matter, the Supreme Court is cheating 1000 million people by allowing the real culprits to abscond.

          The Directorate of Income Tax, on 12 August 2011, found undisclosed assets of Re.30 crore each in the residences of actors Mammotty and Mohan Lal. One cannot buy 30 cent of land in a city for Re.30 crore. But the Directorate of Income Tax proclaims this raid as an achievement.

           President Pratibha Patil - in her Independence Day eve address to the nation - said that corrective actions must be taken to restore the credibility of the constitutional positions. She added that corruption was spreading like cancer. She wanted the Parliament, judiciary and social organizations to solve this problem.

          This is, apparently, the indirect reply of  President Pratibha Patil to the last letter. However, media described this as a reply to the agitation of Anna Hazare.

          The cancer of corruption, now, originates from the President of India. In fact, President Pratibha Patil could have created a new India based on her reason, will and love. But she consciously supported Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to hand over Re. three lakh crore to - arbitrarily selected - three boys!

         

          The Government, on 16 August 2011, arrested Anna Hazare and sent him to Tihar jail. The Government did this to pre-empt him from undertaking an indefinite fast at Delhi for a new anti corruption act.

          Immediately, a large number of people came to the street to ventilate their pent up anger against the Government. Apparently, they wanted something more than the Act.

     Anna Hazare had asked everyone to come with a candle each. But many boys were keeping firelighters!

           As a result, the Indian system – at least theoretically - collapsed on 16 August 2011.

       No one was injured. Delhi police must be commended for this.

       However, the security agencies might have advised the Government to shift the Presidential Palace, Supreme Court and the Parliament House to a safe place outside Delhi.

          The Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, said that Anna Hazare problem would be solved soon. He knew that the people behind him were dummy leaders of the eight men responsible for running the nation.

          Anna Hazare, on 17 August 2011, described his fast for a new Anti-corruption Act as the second freedom struggles.

          It should not end as the second conspiracy to deny freedom of expression.

          On 5 November 2004, a five judge Constitution Bench headed by Justice N.Santosh Hegde held that a Governor of a State could independently accord sanction for prosecution of a Minister in prevention of corruption cases “without the aid and advice” of the Council of Ministers.  The Court observed that “if on facts and circumstances of a case, the Governor cannot act on his own discretion; there would be a complete breakdown of rule of law inasmuch as it would then be open for Governments to refuse sanction in spite of overwhelming material showing that prima facie case is made out”. The Bench included Justice S.N.Variava, Justice B.P.Singh, Justice H.K.Sema and Justice S.B.Sinha.

        The present writer had then described the above judgment as a reward for his 42 letters.

          If the Governor could act independently, the President of India could also act independently. Even children would understand it.

          After writing such a clear judgment, Santosh Hegde gives legal opinion to Anna Hazare for a new act to prosecute the Prime Minister in corruption cases! Tomorrow, he would demand the prosecution of President Pratibha Patil to take away the credit from this writer.

         The Lower House, on 18 August 2011, impeached Justice Soumitra Sen of Culcutta High Court for amassing wealth while he was functioning as a receiver of the High Court. All Chief Justices of India since 2001 besides G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly of the Supreme Court should be impeached for “fixing” judgments.

          500 officers of the Income Tax (IT) Department raided the premises of the Saravana Jewellers, Chennai, on 18 August. There are hundreds of bigger jewelers in India. The people simply fail to understand the specialty of this merchant alone.  The IT Department should have treated everyone equally.

          The recipients of the PF money have converted Re.3 lakh crore into Re.  6 to 9 lakh crore. They keep Re.3 to 6 lakh crore as black money. The IT Department has no eye to see it.

          On the same day, the CBI blocked the accounts of Mr. Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy. This is consistent with the theory that all small entrepreneurs would be sent to Jail.

         

           Finance Minister Pranab Mukergee, on 19 August 2011, said that 5 to 10 per cent shares of the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) will be sold to garner Re.40,000 crore during 2011-2012.

          If the Government could sell 5 percent shares, it could sell 100 percent shares. This was the principle followed to hand over Re.3 lakh crore rotting in the PF to private parties.

          There are reports that the LIC would buy the shares of the private companies for Re.50,000 crore immediately.

          The act of selling the shares of the PSUs against public money and the act of buying the shares of the private companies using public money is a vicious act of corruption. This happens because of the President of India.

          President Pratibha Patil  could have:

        1. Issued orders for the prosecution of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh for the PF amount.

          2. Restrained the Government from buying the shares of private companies using public money.

          3. Restrained private parties from buying the shares of the PSUs using public money.

          4. Prevented the Government from granting tax exemption to investments in the hands of private parties.

          5. Asked the Government to restore public assets.

          6. Enforced freedom of expression.

          If noting  worked, she could have asked the Supreme Court to give its opinion.

          She has not done anything other than lending her  support  to corruption.

          President of India cannot support acts of corruption and claim immunity from prosecution.

          Therefore, President Pratibha Patil is liable for prosecution.

               The facts from 8 August 2011 to 20 August 2011are being submitted to Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 21 August 2011.

          The same letter is being sent to the Chief Justice of India and the Chiefs of the Indian Army and Indian Air Force.

V.Sabarimuthu.

26-3 Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O.

Kanyakumari District

  

182. Pratibha Devisingh Patil - Manmohan Singh - A wicked Cause

182

A WICKED CAUSE

The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 24 July 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court, Indian Army, Indian Air Force, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Chief Information Commissioner (CIC)   and the Chief Justices of Chennai, Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai and Culcutta High Courts.  It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

          Pratibha Devisingh Patil posted her assets- about Re. 2.5 crore- in a website on 25 July 2011.

          A person possessing power gets money:

1. For doing duty as per rules. The beneficiaries might give money to him. For instance, Mr. Raja, former Telecom Minister,  following the precedent set by Arun Shourie - did his duty. The beneficiaries might have given, say, Re.200 crore to someone. They might give another Re.2000 crore after, say, 10 years.

2. For bending the rules. If Raja had bent the precedent, the beneficiaries would have given Re.2000 crore and another Re.20,000 crore after 10 years.

3. For importing goods from other countries. Here, some boys got more than $30 billion from China for importing ships, telecom equipment and others. This is the reason why India allows the businessmen to sell “Made in China” products with “Made in India” stickers. Even Mr. A.K.Antony, Defence Minister of India, is unable to defend the interests of Indian industry in this matter.

4. For constitutional policy decisions.  If a no objection certificate from Indian manufacturers is made a mandatory one for imports, the L&T Company might give some money to the present writer and the policy makers.

5. For unconstitutional policy decisions. For allowing the act of converting the public money into private assets, the beneficiaries give money. Some people –instead of money –accept responsible positions. Pratibha Devesingh Patil,  and Dr.Manmohan Singh, Prime Minister of India, come under this category.

          The Supreme Court, on 29 July 2011, stayed the iron ore mining operations in the Bellary region of Karnataka State. Had the mining been done by the POSCO or by the top eight industrial houses, the Supreme Court might have stood as a guarantee for the investors.

          On 31 July 2011, Justice Santosh Hedge, a retired judge of the Supreme Court, said that Mr. L.K. Advani was like his father. The TV channels of under-ground moles gave great publicity to his confession.

           Manmohan Singh, on 31 July 2011, said that the Prime Minister should not be brought under the Anti-corruption Act.
             
         The Chief Information Commissioner acknowledged a letter sent to him.

          A bomb blast killed five people at Impal in Manipur on 1 August 2011.

          The salary of Mr. Sunil Mittal would increase from the present Re.27.5 crore per annum to Re.70 crore per annum in 2011-2012.

           Mittal could easily take Re.2000 crore as his yearly salary from his company. Re.70 crore is a very small amount. However, this amount is equivalent to the salaries of the all the learned judges of the Supreme Court and all the senior officers of the armed forces put together. The reason for his fortune is that he had secured the spectrum under the- first come –first served policy.

          The Governor of Karnataka State, Mr. H.R. Bhardwaj, on 3 August 2011, granted permission to prosecute the outgoing Chief Minister, Mr. B.S. Yeddyurappa, under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for the alleged illegal mining of iron ore in the state. The basis of his action was a report submitted by Justice Santosh Hegde, Head of the Anti- corruption Unit of the Karnataka State.

          Bhardwaj –during his stint as the Union Law Minister - had divested of the assets of Ramalinga Raju and sent him to jail with the help of Manmohan Singh. Later, he handed over the assets to a big industrial house. He is doing the same work now - with the same motive -  with the help of Manmohan Singh and the Supreme Court. Whatever the small investors do is illegal. This is the plight of small entrepreneurs in India.

          In this connection, it must be stated that Santosh Hegde –as a judge of the Supreme Court- had been successfully concealing this work from the eye of the people. Even now, he is not ready to disclose the existence of this work to the people. Anyone could gauge his real nature.

          The Government of Kerala State, on 2 August 2011, leased –apparently for 100 years- 82 acre of land at Techno Park Trivandrum to the TCS of Mr. Tata to establish a Global Learning Academy.

          The Kerala State is the beneficiary.

          However, Tata would not hesitate to give 2 acre of land each  to Mr. Oommen Chandy, Chief Minister of Kerala and his predecessor Mr. V.S. Achudhanandan  or their representatives after, say,10 years for giving the above land under, say, 100 years lease rather than the usual 30 years.

         

          The Government of Kerala State, on 3 August 2011, issued orders to evict Mr. Sreenijin, son-in-law of former Chief Justice of India K.G. Balakrishnan, from the 30 cent of encroached land.

          If the Union Government had given Re.10,000 crore from the Provident Fund (PF) to Balakrishnan under one business principle or other, Sreenijin would have got 100 acre of land from the Government of Kerala to establish a Global Learning Centre of Excellence. As he did not get money like this, he was constrained to encroach 30 cent. Now, the law proceeds even against the son-in-law of Balakrishnan.

          Mrs. Sonia Gandhi underwent an operation in the USA on 4 August 2011. None revealed her actual medical condition to the media. The media has been concealing many vital things. Now, Sonia Gandhi has chosen to ignore the media.

          However, she had appointed a transition team -comprising A.K. Antony, Ragul Gandhi, Janardan Dwivedi and Ahmed Patel- to look after all matters related to the Congress Party before she left India.

          The composition of the team shows that she had been disgusted with the rule of Manmohan Singh. Now the above team might ask him to quit office or reverse his unconstitutional decisions. This would infuriate the eight men. Naturally, the team is now between the, devil and the, deep blue sea.

           

          A Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Aftab Alam and R.M. Lodha, on 5 August 2011, asked the Delhi Police to wind up its probe into vote-for-cash complaint in three weeks. It observed that middle men of  the cheapest quality subverted the Parliamentary System.

          The truth is that the Supreme Court subverted the Parliamentary System through its refusal to enforce freedom of expression.

          A special court rejected the bail plea of Mr. Ramalinga Raju, former Chief of Satyam Company and six others.

          Pratibha Devising Patil would say that the small entrepreneurs must be sent to jail in the interest of national development.

          Pratibha Devisingh Patil, on 6 August 2011, said that the legal apparatus in the country is to uphold constitutional principles in the interest of national development and human dignity. She added that she was holding Indian judiciary in high esteem.

       Her statement shows that she stands for the conversion of public assets into private assets, and for the denial of freedom of expression.

          In this connection, it must be stated that a man accused of committing a murder cannot be convicted without giving him a chance to defend himself. For this he needs a lawyer. The latter receives money from the former –without the slightest compunction- to secure the best possible outcome.

          Naturally, the morals of a lawyer are different from that of others.

          Anyone going through this work would say that Pratibha Patil hacked to death the Constitution of India - in the heart of the Presidential Palace - by allowing Manmohan Singh to hand over Re.3 lakh crore to three boys. She did it at dead of night because the people were not aware of it.

Pratibha Patil would justify her action because she had been a practicing lawyer.

But all right thinking people think that it is neither natural nor common and some wicked cause must be at the bottom of it.

Pratibha Patil could make amends for it by:

1.     Ordering the prosecution of Manmohan Singh.

2.     Asking the Supreme Court to give its opinion.

3.     By restraining the Government from converting public assets into private assets.

4.     Enforcing freedom of expression.       

        The facts from 24 July 2011 to 7 August 2011are being submitted to Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India on 8 August 2011.

V.SABARIMUTHU

26-3 Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O.

Kanyakumari District

PIN:629167

            

Padmanabhaswamy Temple - Drowning

181

DROWNING

          The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 14 July 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court, Indian Army, Indian Air Force and Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

              A three –judge bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justices Altmas Kabir, Cyriac Joseph and H.L.Dattu on 14 July 2011 said that Mr. Prasant Bhushan, adovocate, Supreme Court, should tender an apology for describing the Chief Justice of India, S.H. Kapadia, as a corrupt person. The bench gave time till September 6, 2011 to find a way to wriggle himself out of the contempt proceedings filed by amicus curiae, Harish Salve. The advocate in 2009 –according to the media- said that Justice Kapadia should not have heard a case relating to Vedanta Company as he held the shares of that company.

          The Radia tape revealed that Justice K.G. Balakrishnan had fixed some crucial judgments. Now, at least a name- sake enquiry is going on regarding his wealth.

The above accusation comes from an advocate involved in a Re.4 crore corruption issue. Besides, S.H.Kapadia is rejecting all acts of corruption as policy decisions. Therefore, the above bench should not have hesitated to order an enquiry into his assets.

Further, Vedanta had been a charge-sheeted company. Yet, it could buy a few Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) in violation of a guideline. The reason was that the learned judges of the Supreme Court were the pillars of this company.

          The Delhi Police on 17 July 2011 arrested Mr. Sanjeev Saxena, a close friend of Mr. Amar Singh- in connection with the 22 July 2008 cash –for-vote scandal. He was arrested because a Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Aftab Alam and Justice R.M. Lodha had wanted it to take the case to its logical conclusion within two weeks. The bench added that the police had given a wishy-washy report.

          It may be recalled that on July 22, 2008 three Members of Parliament (MPs) belonging to the BJP party –Ashok Argal, Faggan Singh Kulaste and Mahavir Bhagora- placed Re.1 crore in cash in the Parliament alleging that the money was given to them to withdraw their support to the UPA- I Government at the Centre.

          The people indirectly involved in this case were mentioned in the Chapters 95 and 96.

          The Delhi Police should have disclosed the real donor of the money, or the bank from which the money came before affecting the arrests.

          Had the Supreme Court been alert to environmental changes, its very frame of mind would have prompted the Delhi Police to reveal the identity of the donor long ago.

          Similarly, Re.3 lakh crore from the Provident Fund (PF) would not have gone in the hands of three private parties. None would have been allowed to convert public money into private assets either.

          The Union Government on 14 July 2011 arbitrarily decided to apportion Re. 3.5 lakh crore Provident Fund (PF) money among: 1.State Bank of India (SBI) 2. ICICI Bank  3. Reliance Capital  and 4. HSBC Asset Management for three years from September1, 2011 in the ratio 3.5:2.5:2:2. They will manage this money.

          The Business Line sparingly reported this. All other newspapers blacked out this news.

          Having published it, the above paper – in its editorial on 21 July 2011 - said that the prospects for deploying the PF funds for greater common good have never been as bright as then.

          In return, the eight men persuaded Ragul Gandhi to stay in the farmer’s houses in the Utter Pradesh(UP) State, and gave publicity all over India. Besides, they might have given an assurance to keep his mother, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, and Dr. Manmohan Singh, Prime Minister of India, in the present position.  

          The SBI will spend this money for buying the shares of the other three entities. Thus the money would virtually go into the hands of three individuals and a few others close to them.

          Three years ago Re.3 lakh crore was given. Now, it is Re.3.5 lakh crore. After three years, the amount would increase to Re. 5 lakh crore. Therefore, the recipients –for all practical purposes – need not return the money.

          They would spend a portion for lending purposes. No other citizen has this chance.

          Another portion would be spent for buying the shares of the PSUs, and for buying assets all over the world. In this way, the net asset value of the purchased assets would double within three years. No other citizens –the learned judges of the Supreme Court included – get money even for buying 5 cent of land.

          A small amount would go for the exploration of natural assets.

          The SBI deducts processing fee even for jewel loans. There is not even any processing fee for this. Instead, the Government must give a small amount for safe keeping.

          The money could have been used for the railways, bullet trains, exploitation of minerals, poverty alleviation, solar energy and education. There are even now schools without black boards in India.

           Manmohan Singh, could have put off this decision. But he has received Prime Minister Ship as bribe for this amount. He would even say that such things would not come to his attention.

          The members of the Union Cabinet could have disallowed this. But they presumably think that they owe their position to the eight industrialists.

           Sonia Gandhi could have changed the policy. But her son-in-law would be caught for disproportionate assets.

          When the Union Government in January 2005 decided to invest 5 per cent of the PF money in shares, the present writer pointed out the unconstitutional nature of the policy. The then President of India, Abdul Kalam, applied a brake.  Therefore, Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, President of India, could have vetoed this. But she –like Manmohan Singh –had accepted President Ship as a bribe for transferring this amount.

          The Chief of the Indian Army, General Deepak Kapoor, could have brought this to the notice of the Supreme Court. But the people would relate this with his date of birth.

          The Chief Justice of India, Kapadia, could have stayed this. But he is one of the members in the long line of Chief Justices trusted by the eight industrialists. Many other judges might have given legal advice to the eight men. Some others hesitate to sacrifice their post retirement positions in the Government or private companies.

          The decision of the Government will affect the well being of the people and the salaries of the employees.

          This is against the Preamble, Article 14 and all other sections of the Constitution of India.

          This is the biggest act of corruption the world has even seen. This takes place in the level of the Supreme Court.  

        Even if all the contentions were wrong, the Supreme Court should not have allowed the Government to transfer this amount to private parties - three years ago - before enforcing freedom of expression. Then the people would have taken this matter in their hand. The so-called anti-corruption crusaders like Anna Hazare, Ram Dev, Santhosh Hegde, Kiran Bedi and others might have got a point.

          The Supreme Court should not have resisted the Constitution of India like this. But there must be some judges  ever ready to follow their best self.

          A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhvi and Justice A.K. Ganguly on 16 July 211 ruled that the land acquired for public purpose could not be re-allotted to other beneficiaries.

          Thus the court annulled a policy decision because of its unconstitutional nature.  It must be noted that Justice J.S. Singhvi had been involved in a Re.4 crore corruption matter. 

          Whenever, the Government sold the land belonging to the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs), the present writer pointed out this. Now the bench says the same in a small case. But the Supreme Court refuses to stand by this point when bigger cases confront it.

          On 21 July 2011, a petition was filed in the High Court, Chennai for restraining the Tamil Nadu State Government from giving wet grinders and mixers to the people. At the same time, the wet grinder manufacturers are protesting against the decision of the Government to import these items from China.

          It must be noted that the above decision is a poverty alleviation measure. Incidentally, it would create several small entrepreneurs and eradicate the unemployment problem.

          But bulk buying always involves big commission. As the Government purchased cycles and colour TVs in bulk, all small traders of these items suffered a silent death. Therefore, the buying process must be delegated to the district level.

          When the DMK Government supplied Colour TVs, none realized that the TV parts could have been from China.

          Now, it has been established that there exists a plot to make India a vassal of China. For this, China has given over $30 billion as bribe to some boys. This is the reason why all houses in India are filled with illegally imported Chinese items. As a result, several small industries in India have perished.

          The recipients of the bribe are, apparently, behind the present Government of Tamil Nadu.

          Therefore, it is imperative that the Government must be restrained from importing any articles from China to the detriment of the Indian Industry.

          A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice Dalveer Bhandari and Justice Deepak Verma on 22 July 2011 dismissed the appeal of Mr. Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy to stay a CBI enquiry for his wealth.

       High Court, Andra Pradesh (AP) had ordered the enquiry on the receipt of a letter by Mr. P. Shanker Rao, a minister in the AP State.

          One letter was sufficient for the High Court, AP, to order an enquiry. The present writer has sent 180 letters to the Chief Justice of India alone. Yet, the Supreme Court is not ready to address the vital issues present in them.

          The Union Government on 22 July 2011permitted the Reliance Industries to sell 30 per cent of its shares of the KG-D6 gas field for 7.2 billion to London based BP Plc.

          The above gas field belongs to 1000 million people. No private party has any right over it. However, now it is in the hands of the usurpers of public assets.

          The AP state must get about $0.6 billion as document charge. It would not get even this.

          In the above matter -  just like Mr. Venkaiyah Naidu -Mr. Jaipal Reddy, Union Minister from the AP state, has done  a great disservice to his home state.

          Over 100 officers of the Department of Income Tax raided the residences of Mohan Lal and Mamootty- two Malayalam film actors. The officers might have found some black money.

          After giving about Re.30 lakh crore to some boys, the Government is deflecting the attention of the people to such raids.

          The Special Court turned down the request of A. Raja to hear the case after the completion of the investigation. Apparently, the Special Judge listened to a hidden voice.

         The CBI on 23 July 2011 told the Special Court that first-come –first –served policy was not carried out in letter and spirit to the benefit of Swam Telecom, Unitech Wireless and Reliance Communication Ltd.

          The Prime Minister of India, two judges of the Supreme Court, the senor officers of the CBI and the judge of the Special Court knew this. Yet they are not ready to cancel the spectrum granted to them. Who are the corrupt?

          It is pertinent to recall that when the King of Travancore was poisoned to death in 1679, the Queen –Umayamma Rani- was left with her six sons –all minors. The men from eight powerful houses and their confederates waited upon her and gave their assurances of allegiance to her and her children.

         One day, five of the princes were inveigled to go to a bathing tank along with other boys. When the boys were enjoying their swim, a few hired men came to the tank under the pretext of bathing, and seizing the princes drowned them. The confederates then spread a rumour that the princes were accidentally drowned while bathing.

          There was no doubt in the mind of the Queen about the simultaneous drowning of her five sons because the Kings were determined men capable of supervising the funds of the Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple and the country. She was entirely helpless. Finding her stay near the temple unsafe, she retired with her only surviving son to a safer place. She gave up the affairs of her government, her whole thought being the safety of her son and heir.

          Now, the money in the hands of the Supreme Court is an unlimited one.

          If Re.3.5 lakh crore in the Provident Fund could be give to three boys for safe keeping, another Re.3.5 lakh crore rotting in the Pension Fund also could be given to them.

          Re. 2.5 lakh crore could be given from the Life Insurance Corporation of India  (LIC) every year.

          About Re.10 lakh crore from the Public Sector banks could be given under the pretext of buying shares.

          The money in the post offices also could be given.

          They would get a profit of about Re.10 lakh crore from the spectrum and minerals.

          Above all, there exists a foreign exchange of over $300 billion.

          The budget of about Re. 13 lakh crore could be managed by: Taxes = Re. 8 lakh crore, Borrowals = Re.4 lakh crore and Selling the shares of the PSUs =Re.1 lakh crore.

          In fine, they are poised to get not less than Re.30 lakh crore during 2011 -2012. Surely, this amount is more alluring than the treasure in the Padmanabhaswamy Temple.

          Realizing this, they inveigled some young members of the DMK party to Delhi. They assured excellent career to them throughout their life.

          The senior leaders like Mr. Sharad Pawar might have advised them to use their practical wisdom in the Union Cabinet and make money like his daughter.

          However, being young, they might have become a danger to some of their secret ambitions connected with the wealth of the nation. Therefore, they drowned them through the aid of the hired men in the Supreme Court. This is the observation of the people sitting away from Delhi.

          The fact from 14 July 2011 to 23 July 2011 are being submitted to Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India on 24 July 2011.

V.Sabarimuthu

26-3 Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagummodu PO

PIN 629167.