71
THE BLOODLINE
On 9 June, 2006 the militants killed five persons in
The Department of Income Tax on 9 June, 2006 attached the properties and bank accounts of the main eye witness in the Best Bakery case. Earlier, the Department asked her on April 12 to file her income tax returns by April 15.
A two judge Supreme Court Bench, in a judgment, said that courts, while interpreting a statute, must adopt a construction, which suppresses mischief and advances remedy. This rule of interpretation is known as the “Rule of purposive construction or Mischief Rule”. The judgment was pronounced on 25 May, 2006. However, a newspaper published it on 10 June, 2006 only. The reason for the delay is not known to anyone. However, the judgment is consistent with the views of this writer in the “petrol pump case”. Perhaps the learned judges were indicating an escape route to His Excellency the President of India. In fact, the President could have taken immediate action to restore rule of law using this judgment.
The stock market continued its downward trend. The media mafia attributed the fall in share prices to international factors, global money and the missile test in
However, the initial public offerings (IPOs) of many companies came to a standstill. This must have been due to the steps taken by a group of Union Ministers in response to the email sent to His Excellency the President of India on 4 June, 2006. The Union Ministers – with no interest to enrich themselves by virtue of their position - might have vetoed the manipulations. They might have vetoed it in a casual way. But they must realize that it is a giant step for the 1000 million people. The President of India also might have done something in this matter. If these inferences were correct, it might go down as another achievement of this work provided the story is not repeated under one pretext or other. For this, this writer would like to thank the President of India and all leaders in person. But, the distance factor and the financial constraints stand in the way.
The Prime Minister of India on 9 June, 2006 received the “Country Head Award” conferred to him by International Association of Lions Club, from its international president. The honour is bestowed on heads of state or government for their contribution to humanitarian causes and betterment of society. An earlier recipient of the award was Mrs. Indira Gandhi.
In the mean time, the Vice President of India said that the Prime Minister of India must be above law.
The Chairman of a private company announced that his company would invest about Re. 4000 crore in
A newspaper on 21 June, 2006 said that the Prime Minister was functioning in a disquieting way.
The Union Government on 22 June, 2006 decided to sell 10 percent shares each of the public sector Neyveli Lignite Corporation (NLC) and the National Aluminium Company (NALCO). Thus, the Union Government ignored the suggestion of this writer to reserve the shares of the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) to various States. However, the decision appeared as a well thought out ploy to divert the attention of the people from the manipulations going on in Mumbai.
A leader of the DMK party requested the Prime Minister to abandon the above decision. He gave a suggestion to sell the shares to the employees. The Prime Minister immediately informed him that the Government would provide adequate allocation of shares to the employees while selling 10% of the shares. He said that the employees would have a stake in the NLC. But, as the employees could not buy all shares, he said that a fraction of the shares alone would be given to them. The employees of the NLC were against any kind of sale and they resorted to an indefinite strike. The opposition parties in
Again the DMK leader requested the Prime Minister of India to annul the decision to sell the shares of the NLC. In fact, he wanted to dissociate himself from all privatization decisions. On 6 July, 2006 he conveyed his decision to withdraw the support to the Union Government over this matter. Instantly, the Union Government decided to keep in abeyance all privatization plans. In this matter, the DMK party went a step ahead of this writer although the Government would not have listened to their demand without this work. However, the DMK party refused to play a double role in this matter. It was the first time a political party in
On 23 June, 2006, The Leadership Summit of the United States of India Business Council (USIBC) gave Leadership Award to an Indian private company for being the Most Respected Multinational Business Conglomerate”.
The militants on 20 June, 2006 killed five people in
A newspaper interviewed the Chief Minister of
A two judge Supreme Court Bench on 5 July, 2006 rejected an application filed by an
Another two judge Supreme Court Bench on 5 July, 2006 wanted the Government to act like a model employer. They said this when the Government applied “no work, no pay” principle to the strike period of the doctors. The doctors had struck work for 15 days protesting against the proposed reservation policy of the Government. The transformation of the Supreme Court could be discerned. Had this been the attitude of the Supreme Court, 10,000 dismissed road workers in
The Indo-Chinese border at Nathu-La in
A Non Resident Indian (NRI) businessman called on the Chief Minister of
The General Secretary of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) on 8 July, 2006 requested the Government not to export iron ore. He said that
A series of six grenade attacks in
A newspaper on 12 July, 2006 said the teachers in Government schools draw five digit salaries only to see the students fail in the examinations. The paper added that the bureaucracy and the teachers in
The Union Government on 12 July, 2006 informed the Supreme Court that it would consider provision of quotas for States under the 15 percent all
The Central Information Commission (CIC) on 16 June, 2006 indicted the “Secretariat” of the President of India for not giving answer to the questions of the common people.
The above indictment against His Excellency the President of India clearly shows that the President of India should have either given answers to all unanswered questions of this writer or given a status report of the letters without any hesitation. Alternatively, he could have asked the Presidential Secretariat and various other authorities to give answers to the queries, suggestions, demands and recommendations. However, the President of India failed to do so. Is it not a denial of democracy? Do the words of the President match with his actions? What would the children think of this? The President of India must, at least now, give a status report of all the letters, lest the people would infer that the direction of the CIC as another subtle attempt to deny democracy to 1000 million people. The Government would try to circumvent this order is another matter.
In the meantime, the Union Government increased the old age pension from Re.75 per month to Re.200 per month.
The Union Minister for surface Transport revealed the allotment of Re.5000 crore for widening the Highways in
A two judge Supreme Court Bench on 17 July, 2006 directed the Government to pay salary to the doctors who struck work protesting against the proposed reservation policy of the Union Government violating the “no work no pay principle” partly because the Prime Minister had assured them that no punitive action would be taken against them and partly because the court had asked them to resume work.
A two judge Supreme Court Bench advised the judiciary not to interfere in policy decisions, whether the decision taken by the Government was agreeable to the court or not. Quoting a judgment of the Supreme Court of the
On 20 July, 2006 the Prime Minister of India exhorted the industrialists to look after investment and trade opportunities in the neighbouring countries.
Now the Tamil Nadu state converted all self-supporting courses in Government Engineering and Arts and
In this connection, it must be noted that in 2001 the people all over
A newspaper on 23 July, 2006 said that the Prime Minister wanted to give up his job. The paper said that he met a Congress leader with a resignation in his pocket.
On 25 July, 2006 a private company bought back 2.68 crore shares. Anyone would tell that this is a small part of the Re.17000 crore collected from the public. The money collected from the public is being utilized as personal income without any tax liability. Why does the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) fail to notice it? After all, the
A newspaper on 25 July, 2006 said that unless the corporate led capitalism in
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on 27 July, 2006 permitted Indian mutual funds to invest up to $2 billion in overseas market. The earlier ceiling was $1 billion.
It must be reiterated that extracting money from all over
The Government launched an online facility for issuing the Importer –Exporter Code number (IEC).
The President of India on 29 July, 2006 requested the Government to provide social security number to all citizens to contain militancy. Incidentally, it would contain economic offences also.
On the same day, the President requested the judiciary to live up to the expectation of the people. The judiciary, as a rule, ignores his demand is another matter.
In the meantime, a Tamil daily reported that the promoter of a private company owned 60,000 acre of land in Gujarat and
On 2 August, 2006 the newspapers reported that the members of the family of a Chief Minister purchased properties worth 36.06 crore within 51 days of assuming office. The newspapers must report such matters. However, why do they conceal the work of this writer? This is what Re. 100,000 crore recently given to some boys does. They would tarnish the image of anyone except the manipulators. This is one of the reasons why the sum of Re.100000 crore must be recovered forthwith.
In the meantime, many Members of Parliament alleged that the Union Ministers had links with some manipulators. The allegations gave the impression that these Ministers were the two key backroom players of the previous NDA Government.
The Foreign Ministers of the SAARC countries met in
A Committee found that a former Union Minister and his son were the beneficiaries of the UN oil-for-food programme in
The initial public offerings (IPO) of two private companies were oversubscribed by 62.88 and 6.47 times. The issues were opened on 31 July, 2006 and closed on 4 August, 2006. There is nothing wrong in the IPOs. But, if the Government had asked the financial institutions to subscribe public money to them, it would go down as another betrayal.
In this connection, it must be stated that the Government allows tax exemptions for the premium paid to the public sector LIC. On its part, the
Further, the banks have fielded a number of “confidence trickers” throughout the length and breadth of
Those who agree to transmit the deposits in the banks - to the tune of say, Re 100,000 crore (One lakh crore) or more per year - to the private parties come to power in
But this manipulation leads to flight of capital. This affects the economic activity all over
Obviously, so long as the militants take a decision not to kill innocent people, the people would continue to die in their hands. Similarly, so long as the President and the Union Government decide not to allow the above wicked manipulations, 1000 million people would continue to pay this unconstitutional tribute.
There must be a limitation for the amount of money that could be removed from the financial institutions. Men, as a rule, in
This writer is not all against any boy in
The Government wanted to sell a Public Sector Undertaking (
The banks and the
One would say that the private industry would perish the moment the money flowing from the financial institutions into the stock market is impeded. However, building a system on unconstitutional principles would invite greater troubles. The Unit Trust of India collapsed because there was none in
One would say that the money flowing into the private companies through the stock market and mutual funds shall not be stopped suddenly. In order to over come this, the Government could arrange a loan with the knowledge of the Parliament. Alternatively, the Government could announce a bail out package to them with the approval of the Parliament. The NDA Government did this in a straight forward way to save the face of the
It must be noted that even uneducated people consider the manipulation as an “inhuman act”. After hearing this, it was they who first described this as “a modern day plunder”. After reading this work, a retired Head Master says that the manipulations are shivering to him. He says that all people must know this piece of information. But, this man alone is saying this in
How could the Government foist such inhuman manipulations upon the people? The manipulation like this could not have been inflicted upon the people without the cooperation of the Central Bureau of Investigation (
Further, it is not easy to pass off such manipulations without the support of the learned judges of the Supreme Court also. In February 2002, a few judges elevated from the bar had been allowed to get additional five years of service. The explanation given was to enable them to claim proper pension benefits. Apparently, this is the reason why the long arm of law is too weak to catch the manipulators. Otherwise, how could the Supreme Court cancel the petrol pumps distributed by the Members of Parliament and enable a boy to distribute 5000 petrol pumps? The people suspect that these learned judges played a dominant role in the Supreme Court in foisting unconstitutional principles upon the people. Therefore, the antecedents of the beneficiaries of this order may also be probed to get a better picture. The President could transmit his finding through any competent authority.
Above all, it must be noted that the former President of India acted quickly and decisively on the letters sent to him. Otherwise,
The President of India could have revealed this work or the importance of this work to the people to achieve the objectives. Alternatively, he could have disclosed the salient points of this work in his address to the Parliament. This would have generated an interest among the people to know the nature of this work. This is because the people have a basic right to know news and views. They have a right to know the men and matters in
Now the
Recently, a member of the Royal family of Travancore died in a road accident. Revolving red lights would avert such tragedies. Further, it must be noted that the kings in
In this connection, it is extremely interesting to note that a few knowledgeable people attribute the supernatural appearance of some girls to kingly blood. Some of their boys are as ugly as any others but some have the splashes of kingly behaviour. Some born to concubines are ashamed of disclosing their identity. Anyhow, all Governments could consider the question of protecting the blood line of all kings for the benefit of the posterity. It is like protecting ancient monuments.
Furthermore, when this writer compared the history of Travancore with the present happenings in
The facts from 4 June 2006 to 5 August 2006 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India on
Vellicode V.SABARIMUTHU
72
THE MOST POWERFUL MAN
The email dated 6 August, 2006 was sent to His Excellency the President of India alone.
On 9 August, 2006 the Prime Minister of India skipped a customary tea hosted by the President of India in connection with Quit India Movement. The visit of the Prime Minister of India to the flood affected areas in
In an interview to a TV channel, a former Union Minister disclosed that his name appeared in the Volker Report because of a conspiracy hatched by the
Whether it is a coincidence or not, the
The newspapers on 13 August, 2006 informed the people that the popular support in terms of Members of Parliament for the ruling United Progressive Alliance (UPA) at the centre increased from 222 seats in May 2004 to 306 in August 2006. At the same time, the support for the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) decreased from 189 seats in May 2004 to 120 in August 2006. The support for the Left parties neither increased nor decreased during this time. The report was based on a survey conducted between August 1 and 6. This is their way of encouraging the recent theft.
It is pertinent to note that in the 1946 elections in the U.S.S.R., the Communist candidates polled 99.4 per cent of the total votes cast. It was described as the revolutionary advance of 0.4 per cent over the preceding election. In the elections of December 1947, Stalin polled 131 per cent of the votes from a
Obviously, the popularity of the Prime Minister of India increases because the media mafias describe the Prime Minister as one of the honest politicians in
However, the moment his brute capacity to cover up this work weakens, it would reach the mind of the people. Then, the Prime Minister of India would have to relinquish his power. All Ministers in the Union Cabinet and all the Members of Parliament would find it difficult to support him. All political parties would also retreat. The concept of ballot box would not help him. The mandate also would not come to his rescue. The children would interpret his so-called new economic policy as The New Thieving Policy. In their discerning eye, he would remain as a liability to the nation. This is not to say that the people would change their political loyalties at all. This is only to say that in such a situation, the people might begin to realize democracy in
When a Prime Minister of a country is caught red handed while pick pocketing Re. 50/-, he would remain as the laughing stock of the children for some time. What would happen when the Prime Minister of a nation is caught red handed while thieving Re.100,000 crore? Unless otherwise denied, any child in
In a message to the nation on the eve of the 60 th Independence Day, the President of India stressed the need for a special methodology for the unusual and abnormal banking transactions. This gave the impression that he was looking into the bank transactions through his computer in deference to this work. He further talked about the question of eradicating poverty. He indirectly mentioned several points present in this work including the necessity to protect the cultural heritage of
In this connection, it must be stated that His Excellency the President of India must possess some excellences. The President of India repeatedly says that even children in
The President of India possesses an absolute power to prevent corruption, manipulation and theft. But, he has no power to allow theft. However, the President, despite the huge volume of facts before him, has not acquitted well in discharging his onerous responsibility in this matter. If the banks and the
Further, as servitude, impoverishment and denial of democracy accompany the thieved money; the President should have issued orders to recover it forthwith. However, there is nothing to show that the President has succeeded in recovering the thieved money. The children would not accept this as an excellence.
Any man possessing power must live on the present to exercise his powers for the benefit of humanity. But, the present President is talking about the past and about the year 2020. Thus he simply fails to discharge his day to day duties. As a result, the people are losing their money and freedom of expression. The children would not consider this as an excellence at all.
The President of India is neither restoring rule of law nor is he disclosing the antecedents of some learned judges of the Supreme Court. The children are not likely to consider this as an excellence.
Above all, the President should have brought this work to the notice of the people. This is not to bring glory to anyone. There is a huge mass of political and economic data before him. The reluctance of the President to bring this work to the notice of the people resulted in a theft of Re.100,000 crore. Naturally, the children would think that their President, while advocating a knowledge society, thieved their right to knowledge. They may not tell anything against the President. But they would not accept this as an excellence of the President at all.
In his Independence Day address on 15 August, 2006, the Prime Minister said that he was committed to eradicate poverty in
It must be noted that it is customary for the Prime Minister to talk about the ballot box. He periodically talks about the mandate obtained by the political parties to rule
With regard to terrorism, it must be stated that it is the duty of the Government to give security to the people depending upon their importance. It could be seen that this writer is a very important person in India. The service charges and the transaction charges were two very important suggestions of this writer to overcome the fiscal deficit. The privatization programme was crippled because this writer pointed out the illegalities and manipulations in the deals. The work of this writer prevented the Supreme Court from hearing at least two important cases. The proposal of the manipulators to bring the Co-operative banks under the Reserve Bank of India and their proposal to amalgamate the Public Sector banks were nipped in the bud. Some unconstitutional joint ventures had to be abandoned. Some unconstitutional adjustments of interests were exposed. At least some stumbling steps are being taken to ensure equitable distribution of seats based on this work. The practice of thieving public money in the name of buying shares also would be stopped for good. The writer has no power to make or mar appointments. Yet, a Governor of the Reserve Bank of India had to resign his job. A Finance Minister was asked to surrender his portfolio. Another Union Minister lost his Petroleum portfolio. The work marred the chances of an individual to become the President of India.
These and many other changes that took place during the last five years make this writer a very important person in India. Even now, the Prime Minister would have to resign the moment his capacity to cover up this work weakens. It is true that some people ignore this work. Some ask this writer to do some other work. Some say that India would have taken this line even without this work. Anyhow, all right thinking people, without any hesitation, say that this writer has done something incredible and that there exists a great threat to his life and security. Therefore, “Z” category security must be provided to all people possessing comparable works. At present, the manipulators arrange “Z” category security for themselves or for their representatives only. This trend must be changed. The children would not only want to hear about the work of this writer and similar works of others but also they would like to see such workers. This is the right of the children. The President and all others possessing power shall not take away their right. Therefore, all people with comparable work must be provided with “Z” category security. There is no use in crying over the spilt milk.
The Prime Minister of India on 19 August, 2006 exhorted the judiciary to be more sensitive to the poor. He requested them to protect the rights of the weak. At the same time, he said that he was proud of the quality and effectiveness of the Indian judicial system.
A former Union Minister said that the Volker Report was a doctored one and that his name was added as late as February 2005. Earlier, he had said that the USA interfered in the Volker Committee on 30 October, 2005. The reason for advancing the date is known to him alone. It may be known to the President of India and the intelligence agencies also. It may be noted that a copy of How Everything Happened in India was sent to the President of the USA on 30 May, 2005.
On 26 August, 2006 the newspapers reported that a small private company would come out with a public issue on 29 August, 2006 to mobilize about Re. 40 crore. The issue, apparently, did not come out.
On the same day, a big private company said that the situation prevailing in the country would force the private firms out of business. It wanted the Government to provide a level playing field to private and public sector firms.
A newspaper on 29 August, 2006 reproduced an article published by the Guardian newspaper. The article said that the people see different truths. The paper said that Sophocles who in 430 BC was trying to make Athens aware those humans can never hope to understand the full significance of their actions; there is usually an aspect of the situation that- sometimes fatally- escapes the grasp of the people. In this connection, it must be stated that this writer did not send the copy of the e mail sent to the President of India on 6 August, 2006 to any others. This article and a few other comments of the media mafias give the impression that the copy of that email has reached their hands.
The editorial of a newspaper on 30 August, 2006 said that the salaries of the Government employees were absurdly low. On the same page, through an article the paper said that the proposed Pay Commission would cripple the Central budget. The confusion prevailing among the media mafias could be discerned.
Addressing the national award winning teachers on the eve of Teachers Day, the Prime Minister of India said that he had become a teacher by choice but strayed into politics by accident. He urged the people to chant “teacher is god”- an ancient word of wisdom. He requested the teachers to uphold the best traditions of excellence and commitment to knowledge that people expected from teachers. He said that India needed good hard working, honest and caring teachers. He disclosed that teachers should be given a status that recognized their great contribution to society and to the process of nation building. On hearing his speech one would think that the Prime Minister was not the person behind the theft.
In this connection, it must be noted that awards and rewards including Bharat Retnas- the biggest civilian award- are being arranged by manipulators for themselves only. Those who go through this work say that it is worth more than ten Bharat Retnas. They say that this writer must have got Bharat Retna before he wrote his letter No.23. But the manipulators deny this fearing India might become a democratic country. A few who got Bharat Retnas might say that they got the awards for their contributions only. But it must be stated that they got the award partly to add lusture to the award and partly for their manipulation value. The calculations of the manipulators proved correct when the present President of India, a recipient of Bharat Retna, allowed the manipulators to thieve more than Re 100,000 crore within a span of six months.
On 31 August, 2006, the Union Government decided to return a cheque of Re. 1098 crore sent by the owner of a privatized Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) for buying the residual 49 per cent stake. Unless otherwise a brute decision is taken, the Union Government cannot sell the residual shares of this former PSU to the new owner because a Cabinet decision forbids the Union Government from selling the shares of the PSUs to charge-sheeted companies. It must be noted that this writer alone had reminded this matter to His Excellency the President of India. Obviously, 49 percent shares of this
Further, how did the owner mobilize Re 1098 crore? Is it his personal income? Did he pay tax for this amount? These are all different questions. The Prime Minister would say that the person without the mandate to rule India is not entitled to know the answers.
The President of India on 5 September, 2006 said that the teachers were the builders of the society. He narrated his childhood experiences and mentioned the role played by several of his teachers.
Two massive bomb blasts killed 31 people in a mosque in Maharastra State on 8 September, 2006.
A private company on 9 September, 2006 said that it would invest Re. twelve thousand crore in Tamil Nadu State
In the meantime, many companies deferred their initial public offers (IPOs). This writer was elated because he believed that the Union Ministers –listening to the voice of REASON- restrained the banks and the
However, the newspapers on 9 September, 2006 reported that the financial institutions invested heavily in the initial public offers (IPOs) of two private companies. The veracity of this report is known to the President of India alone. It must be reiterated that the surplus money in the banks and the
The Prime Minister of India on 10 September, 2006 left for Brazil and Cuba to attend the Indo-Brazil –South Africa summit and the XIV NAM summit. However, in view of the developments, the facts from 6 August, 2006 to 10 September, 2006 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India on 11 September, 2006.
V.SABARIMUTHU
73
THE VICTORY DAY
A Union Minister on 12 September, 2006 said that the oil companies had been granted permission to mobilize Re. 30,000 crore by selling shares and that those companies would begin to collect half of the amount very soon. He added that banks would not be permitted to buy those shares. It was the immediate reply to the email sent to His Excellency the President of India on 11 September, 2006.
It must be noted that the reply came within 24 hours. Obviously, His Excellency the President of India might have acted swiftly and transmitted the email to the Union Government. While transmitting the email, the President of India might have directed the Government to restrain the public sector banks and the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) from buying shares. He might have requested the Government to recover the thieved money. He might have sought a decision of the Union Cabinet in these matters. The Union Ministers in and around New Delhi might have met immediately. As the Prime Minister was in Cuba, a fruitful debate might have ensued. The Union Ministers might have realized that one half of national income was being thieved everyday. They might have been startled by this theft of great magnitude. Most of the ministers might have realized that the animal nature in them alone would support the theft. Most of them might have recognized that stopping this theft was more important than aspiring for another term in the Union Cabinet. Ultimately, the public interest of majority of the ministers might have defeated the private interest of a few ministers. Thus, the Union Ministers might have resolved to restrain the banks and the
However, what this writer knows clearly is the email sent on 11 September, 2006 to the President of India and the announcement of the Finance Minister on the next day. What happened in between is an imagination only.
Whatever happened, the decision might go down as one of the greatest achievements of any citizen of India. This might pave the way for lasting peace in India. This was one of the ten points of the first letter dated
These developments in the Union Cabinet shocked a Union Minister and leader of a political party. Therefore, he wanted to create a “Third Front” comprising the Left parties and the other parties to pursue a pro-liberal economic policy. Having discarded the BJP, the manipulators also would think of a third front. However, those who got a share in the looted money alone might join this camp.
Now, there were reports that many Indian companies were turning to international markets for raising money. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) also announced that overseas borrowing by way of External Commercial Borrowings (ECBs) and Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCBs) increased from US$ 2.22 billion in the first quarter of 2005-2006 to US$ 4.43 billion in the first quarter of 2006-2007.
On 13 September, 2006, the chief of an Indian private company said that his company had signed an agreement to buy Daewoo Electronics of South Korea for Re.3220 crore.
On 15 September, 2006 there were reports that an Indian private company was negotiating to buy Ritz- Carlton hotel in Boston. The papers said that the same company was in possession of 75 hotels including those in Mumbai, Buckingham Gate in London and the Pierre in New York.
The turnover of the public sector Bharat Heavy Electrical Limited (BHEL) reached Re. 14,525 crore in 2005-2006 with a profit of Re.1,679 crore. It secured the highest-ever orders worth Re.18,938 crore in 2005-2006. It must be noted that the Union Government was planning to privatize it in 2001 in order to overcome the fiscal deficit.
The MTNL, a Public Sector Undertaking, withdrew its application from the Department of Telecom (DoT) seeking an International Long Distance (ILD) license. It said that it would route its ILD calls through private operators. One would think that the decision is due to the influence of private operators over the Union Government.
A Union Minister on 18 September, 2006 criticized the World Bank for suspending loans to India after classifying it as a corrupt nation. The newspapers said that the World Bank suspended loans to India at the instance of the USA. In this connection, it must be noted that when the World Bank suspended loans to India, the media mafias did not report it.
Mr. Fidel Castro, the President of Cuba, on 16 September, 2006 sought a photograph with the Prime Minister of India so that 1000 million people of India would see them together. The media mafias in India reported this on 18 September, 2006 along with their photograph.
The Union Minister for Railways gave a talk to the students of the Indian Institute of Management (IIM) at Ahmedabad. He was invited to explain the amazing turn-around of Indian Railways. Had this work been known to the IIM, this writer also would have got a chance to explain to the students the amazing turn around of India. The only condition is that the IIM should not be an institution to act on the direction of the manipulators.
In the meantime, an Indian private Bank raised Re.5 billion from the public through bonds or debt. The public sector State Bank of India (SBI) raised Re. 11 billion. Canara bank raised Re. 5.75 billion. Other banks raised smaller amounts. The money was raised in the first two weeks of September, 2006. It was over and above the normal deposits. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) did not give any reason for this. Apparently, the private bank has become bankrupt. This bank wanted Re. 5 billion to escape. The easiest way is to prevail upon the RBI to permit all banks to raise money. The reason for this conclusion is that many small private banks are becoming bankrupt one after another. Another reason is that the private bank wanted to recruit 50000 graduates immediately. Therefore, it is imperative for the President to go into the plight of the private bank or give the real reason for raising this amount. In the past, the SBI raised a huge amount in the name of Resurgent India Bond but the RBI had not said anything about the method of utilization. Therefore, the RBI shall not hide anything from the public in this matter and, if necessary, the private bank must be kept under moratorium immediately.
“What happened to the money of the people? You must ask this question to the Government”. A Congress leader said this during one of the election meetings in Utter Pradesh State on 20 September, 2006.
A former judge of the Supreme Court on 21 September in an article said that a democratic duty of the Government was to tell the truth about the judges. Obviously, newspapers might have transmitted the work of this writer to him to get this article.
On 21 September, 2006 the President of India casually told the students at Trivandrum that the banks were giving loans to pursue higher education.
In this connection, it must be stated that some students are not given loan because their parents are capable of rearing them. Some others are denied loan because they are not capable of repaying it. Further, many branch managers all over India discourage the students or their parents simply by telling stories or by demanding documents one after another. Some simply pretend to give loan. They do not say anything in writing for rejecting a loan application. The frantic efforts of the parents simply go in vain. The President of India is now fully aware of this matter. Yet, the banks do not give a reply to the applicants. It is the dream of the students to lessen the burden of their parents. But all their dreams end in day dreams, as many parents are being simply crushed out of existence.
At the same time, the banks and the
On 22 September, 2006, talking to the students at Kanyakumari in Tamil Nadu State, the President of India said that corruption would be eliminated from India within five years. On the next day, he told the students that the question of eliminating corruption would play a vital role in the nation.
Now, it is evident that the real corruption in India is the money thieved from the banks and the
In another meeting in Tamil Nadu State, the President told the students that importance should be given to civilization and heritage.
No sooner the President said this than the Government of Tamil Nadu demolished the historic Government Hospital building at Thuckalay in Kanyakumari District for erecting a new building. The building had been constructed by a king of Travancore. It was one of the few buildings in Kanyakumari district with a beautiful Travancore shell emblem on it. This piece of information might disturb the President of India, Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu and many others. The Banyan Buddha has been reconstructed in Afghanistan. Now, the building could be rebuilt on the same place. The Hon’ble Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu might not hesitate to rebuild it if the President were ready to bring this to his notice.
Some might fail to gauge the importance of this building. Anyone going through this work would tell that the basis for this work was the good work done by the successive kings in Travancore in the form of load carriers, inns, hospitals, schools, other public buildings, dams, canals, roads, bridges, water ways, forts, parks, memorials and the absence of such works in the last 50 years. The future generation also must see them for inspiration. Further, if such works were destroyed one by one, the people in this area might consider themselves as new settlers.
The President of India could also request the Union Government to protect all structures- small and big- constructed by all kings in India through an Act of Parliament. The President could advise the Union Government to keep a standing fund to do the required maintenance work as and when necessary to protect the dilapidated forts and other structures all over India.
On 24 September, 2006, the President of India said that he was not aspiring for a second term and that he would work as a teacher after his retirement.
In this connection, it must be said that the President of India has been keeping his email address open to all citizens just to know their views. The President of India is keeping a computer in front of him even while addressing public meetings. One reason for this could be to trap the emails from the people like this writer. In fact, no email from this writer has escaped his notice. Further, all emails have a great impact on the Union Cabinet. It appears that the President is transmitting the emails from this writer to the learned judges of the Supreme Court, investigation officers and even Chief Ministers. Obviously, the President of India is spending the major portion of his time in the Presidential Palace just for furthering the suggestions of this writer for the benefit of 1000 million people. This, apparently, is giving sleepless nights to the representatives of the manipulators. Needless to say incredible changes have occurred in India since June 2001. As the leaders would imbibe the good points, they would begin with a new mind producing more and more wonderful results in the long run. Even now anyone going through this work would say that the President has made this writer all in all in India - minus name and security. For the same reasons, the present President of India would not be given a second term. One or two other independent actions of the President also would have contributed to this.
On the same day, the President said that he did his best as President of India.
In this connection, it must be stated that though the President of India is taking some sincere steps to put right many public wrongs, anyone going through this work would tell that the President has not succeeded in restoring rule of law in India. The antecedents of the judges who got extension of service would have given valuable clues to interpret some bad judgments. But the President has not chosen to disclose them. For the same reasons, all the invaded properties still remain with the invaders.
The President of India was alerted as and when the Union Government wanted to give public money to some individuals. Despite this, in the first half of this year alone the Government gave about Re. 100,000 crore. Thus, the banks and the
The President was finally constrained to apply the brake only when the Government was getting ready to give Re.130 billion to 200 billion to a private real estate group, x, in the name of buying 12.8 per cent of its shares or 219 million shares. Thus x had to postpone the public issue from September 2006 to December 2006.
What are the other consequences of giving money like this? The President could take the case of x. Had the money been given, x would multiply the money into Re. 300 billion within a span of six months as the land prices would double within this period. Part of the unutilized money would be given for private finance. Another part would be converted into foreign exchange to buy assets abroad. Still another part would be utilized to destroy democracy. After a long time, Re. 10 to 20 billion would be given as commission to some key men in key places. .
Now, the banks and the
Above all, DEMOCRACY is a word present in the Preamble of the Constitution of India. The duty of the President is to protect it. Democracy is not a matter of conducting elections alone. This is not to say that the President must provide real democracy to Indians. This is only to say that the Government must inform the people the various viewpoints existing in India. In common parlance, it is nothing but promoting freedom of expression. Otherwise, anyone capable of concealing the manipulations would rule India for ever. For this, the media mafias would convert anyone into a great soul depending upon his manipulation value. Therefore, the people must be able to hear at least two different views on vital policy matters to meet the demands of democracy. The Government might have many reasons to put out of sight the viewpoints of others. However, the Government must inform such views to the people even if such revelations might create new centres of resistance. When the Government fails to discharge this responsibility, the President will have to disclose such views to the people. Instead of doing this, the President of India has been asking the students to dream. All people all over India follow this. No meeting ends without the word “dream”. Naturally, the great theft happened because the students started to dream about other things.
In another meeting, the President said that people pursuing a goal would have to take some risks.
A Congress leader on 24 September, 2006 said that the leaders were satisfied by the performance of the Government and the Prime Minister for the last 28 months.
In this connection, it must be stated that a number of political leaders from all over India have been inducted into the Union Cabinet presumably at the instance of the Congress leaders. This must be the maximum a citizen of India could expect from the Congress leaders. Now, it is left to the Union Ministers to decide the destiny of India.
The transaction tax also was introduced presumably due to the intervention of the Congress leaders based on this work. This tax might be extended to saving bank accounts the moment the influence of the manipulators on the system weakens.
Further, apparently, all the past Prime Ministers worked as the representatives of the manipulators only, although the predecessor of the present Prime Minister wanted to dissociate from them. A new Prime Minister also could end up as another representative of them. In these circumstances, it may not be politically wise for the Congress leaders to think of changing the Prime Minister. However, the moment the Government informs the people the salient points of this work, the society might not accept him as the Prime Minister for the simple reason that he allowed a theft by misusing his official position.
General Pervez Musharraf, President of Pakistan, in his book titled “In the Line of Fire” disclosed that “Agra Summit” failed because there seemed to be someone - above him and the then Prime Minister of India - who had the power to overrule them. The former Prime Minister, however, rebutted it.
A Union Minister on 28 September, 2006 said that fine quality iron ore should not be exported to China - a country with huge iron ore reserves. It is clear that his demand is consistent with the work of this writer. Obviously, the manipulators had succeeded in pushing the Government to take some decisions in bad faith.
On the same day, there were reports that the public sector National Aluminium Company (Nalco) got a profit of Re. 1562.2 crore during 2005-2006. In this connection, it must be noted that the then Union Government, wanted to privatize the Nalco in 2001. Anyone, going through this work would tell that it was saved mainly because of the work of this writer.
The Communist Party of India (
A Union Minister, in the meantime, wanted the coalition parties to provide a political space for more economic reforms.
The Prime Minister of India left for South Africa on 30 September, 2006. At Pietermaritzburg he said that the act of throwing out Mr. Gandhi from the first class compartment of the train led to the independence of India and influenced the course of struggle against oppression all over the world. On hearing this, anyone would think that the Prime Minister is in no way responsible for giving Re.100,000 crore to some boys. Instead, anyone would tell that he is a social worker relentlessly working against manipulations and the consequent oppression in India. The people would also infer that India is an independent nation where there is freedom of expression.
A newspaper on 4 October, 2006 described the Prime Minister as “political leader of unimpeachable personal integrity”
The Prime Minister of India on 5 October, 2006 laid the foundation stone for the Dedicated Freight Corridor (
The Prime Minister of India left for the UK on 9 October, 2006 and met the Prime Minister of England, Mr. Tony Blair.
North Korea detonated a nuclear device on 9 October, 2006. India condemned it. One day the manipulators had attributed the fall in share prices to a missile test by North Korea. But the share prices were not affected by this nuclear blast.
The
The Commissioner for Information said that he did not reveal certain pieces of information because he could not distinguish the difference between the words “citizen” and “person” present in the Right to Information Act (RIA). This is, according to him, a sufficient cause for withholding information from the people. Apparently, the President has transmitted this work to him. Obviously, the Commissioner, just like the public sector TV channel, is using his independence to deny independence to 1000 million people.
Ironically, the Cambridge University in England honoured the Prime Minister of India with a doctorate of law. Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburg and Chancellor of the University gave away the degree. The citation described him as a scholar and a public servant of great distinction. The citation said, “He is in the words of the Greek poet Simonides cool, calm, well aware of justice that serves the state and a man of healing virtue”
It noted that it was “very rare indeed for the position of Prime Minister to be entrusted to one who is not a professional politician”
In his reply, the Prime Minister said that in many important ways the University of Cambridge made him. He said that the Cambridge University taught him to be open to argument and to be fearless and lucid in the expression of one’s opinions. He added that those virtues and a relentless desire to pursue intellectual truth were inculcated in him at Cambridge. He further said that the failure to address the growing gap between the rich and the poor and to provide quality services in health and education to all was causing resentment and alienation…. and putting pressure on the practice of democracy”.
The Prime Minister of India then left for Finland
The facts from 11 September, 2006 to 11 October, 2006 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India on 12 October, 2006 through email in the hope that some more benefits would accrue to 1000 million people.
V.SABARIMUTHU
74
WHOLESALE BUTCHERY
Mr. Matti Vanhanen, the Prime Minister of Finland, met the Prime Minister of India on 12 October, 2006.. After the meeting, the Prime Minister of India described India as “an open economy, open society and open polity”
The newspapers on 14 October, 2006 declared that an ISO certified company, sold 29,00,000 shares at Mumbai Stock Exchange. The issue closed on 29 September, 2006. An information technology company entered the stock market on 28 September, 2006 with a public issue of 56,35,950 equity shares. A helicopter transportation company entered the stock market in September 2006 with its initial public offer (IPO) of 35,00,000 shares. The first company could raise approximately Re.90 crore, the second one Re.55 crore and the third one Re.70 crore. This is, apparently, what various companies would raise if they were left free without the interference of the banks and the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC). This reinforces the view that the Government - at the instance of those who possessed real power in India- quite unconstitutionally gave about Re.100,000 crore to some manipulators.
On the same day, there were reports that a company would come out with a public issue to sell 538.47 million equity shares to garner US $ two billion or about Re. 10,000 crore!
Mr. Muhammad Yunus of Bangladesh and his Grameen bank won the Nobel Peace Prize on 13 October, 2006. It was given for efforts by Yunus and the bank to “create economic and social development from below”. Mr. Yunus in 1974 realized that small credit to the rural poor would enable them to help themselves. Accordingly, he gave loan - without any guarantee - to rural women for self employment. Now the bank has 2226 branches and 6.5 million borrowers. This micro credit concept has been copied in more than 40 countries.
The Congress party leader on 14 October, 2006 exhorted the people to fight for their rights.
A Union Minister requested new journalists graduated from a Mumbai college to be truthful while reporting news and views.
The Prime Minister of India on 15 October 2006 said that he was satisfied by the functioning of the Right to Information (
Some newspapers, on the same day, said that the Prime Minister of India very scrupulously avoided limelight on many occasions. Thus, none knew the names of his two grandsons who were admitted in a hospital with dengue fever. Similarly, when his daughter got married to an American lawyer soon after he became Prime Minister, the media remained in the dark. One day, the security personnel asked his son- in-law sitting in a cricket stadium to make place for the guests of the Chief Minister of Delhi. The paper, in order to enhance the image of the Prime Minister of India, said that such incidents were not known to them then.
Some newspapers on 15 October, 2006 described the foreign exchange reserves of India as a dead load on Indian economy. The paper said this to condition the mind of the 1000 million people against the impending disaster. It is an indication to convert the thieved money into foreign exchange. According to them, the foreign exchange shall not be used to stabilize the prices of petroleum products at a reasonable level or to eliminate kerosene rationing or to clear external debts or to finance Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). Therefore, it is imperative for the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Central Bureau of Investigation (
On the same day, the editorial of The New Indian Express said that a few high profile Indians including one book wonders were looking for causes to champion just to remain in the public eye.
Again, on the same day, the Director General of the public sector Indian TV channel said that the TV channel was working like a post office and what ever they received were being marked to its news.
A two judge Bench of the Supreme Court looked down on the policy of the Government to provide 27 per cent reservation to Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in educational institutions and asked the Government to submit a copy of the report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee to the court in a sealed cover. The court scowled that the Government announced a policy without the relevant data before it. The Bench observed that the Government was playing the game without the rule in place. However, all political parties criticized the judgment.
A newspaper on 15 October, 2006 said that the present Prime Minister of India mercifully saved India from bankruptcy in 1991.
The Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on 16 October, 2006 said that proper financial education must be imparted to the students and the people at large so that they would keep the service providers on their toes. It is an admission that the Government gave Re.100,000 crore or more to some individuals. He added that in the UK, the Financial Services Authority recently launched the biggest ever campaign to improve financial literacy of the people. Thus, he wanted the people to believe that he was not responsible for giving Re. 100,000 crore to some boys.
On 17 October, 2006 the Congress party leader said that the objective of joining politics must be to serve the people. The leader exhorted the social organizations to play a pro-active role to mitigate the sufferings of the poor and the needy.
In the meantime, an Indian Company run by a Non Resident Indian (NRI) bought the Avia Truck Business Unit of Czech Republic for US$ 35 million.
On 18 October, 2006 a newspaper said that all Indians must celebrate the success stories of the Indian companies in foreign soil even if they were achieving it through bribes and deceit.
The Prime Minister of India, on the same day, said that private lending to farmers would be regulated and loan would be given to them.
Now newspapers reported that 400 companies were in a state of readiness to enter the stock market to raise Re. 1,50,000 crore. The manipulators were given Re. 100,000 crore or more in the first half of this year. It appeared that they disappeared after the plunder. Alas, they are now reappearing to remove the money by harassing the Government. They know that there exists great résistance to misgovernment. Yet they demand fresh public money for power and wealth.
A five judge Bench of the Supreme Court directed the Government to exclude creamy layer- a doctrine invented by the media mafia and accepted by the Supreme Court- among SCs and STs from the purview of reservation,
Now there were reports that a private bank would once again raise $300 million through an overseas debt. The RBI Governor might have told the reason for raising this amount to His Excellency the President of India.
A newspaper on 21 October, 2006 predicted that in the next few months India would be a battle ground of some interesting new ideas and some interesting new players.
On 20 October, 2006 a private steel company of India gave bid to buy Corus Group, an Anglo-Dutch steel company, for 4.3 billion pounds (36,500 crore). The bid was given in the name of a UK registered company. The Indian company had bought ten other big companies all over the world for various amounts since 2005.
The newspapers on 23 October, 2006 reported that the Union Government sold 10 acre Pankaja Mill and 20 acre of another Mill along with its buildings in Coimbatore city- both belonging to the public sector National Textile Corporation (NTC)- to private parties. The paper also informed that 40 acre of land of three other mills would be sold immediately.
In this connection, it must be stated that the Government has a right to sell or buy anything. But the Government is forbidden from buying and selling anything in bad faith. There is no dearth of money to the Union Government. A fraction of the money that went in the hands of some boys could have been used to retain them. The Government, a few months ago, bought the shares of private companies -even without knowing their net asset value- with one hand. Now it sells public assets with another hand. Therefore, the Government sold the properties in bad faith and in private interest. The property must be recovered forthwith.
Further, it must be noted that a NTC Mill – a Mill of the Union Government- had been handed over to the Pondicherry State. Therefore, the Tamil Nadu State could have demanded it for public purpose. Alternatively, the Union Government could have voluntarily given the Mills to the Government of Tamil Nadu based on the precedent.
Evidently, the properties went in the hands of private parties because this work remains concealed. There is no use in constantly blaming the investigation agencies, The National Human Rights Commission, Supreme Court, Information Commissioner, media mafias and others for this, as everyone stands by the Government. The people are now helpless. They do not know what is happening in India. Their thoughts are centred on their survival. But the President has an absolute right to ask the Government to act in good faith. Therefore, the President of India must realize that he has an absolute right to protect public property. But, as the President of India too denies democracy to Indians, all properties are being plundered one by one.
On 23 October 2006, the Deputy Inspector General of Orissa State, died of gun shot injuries. The media mafias immediately concocted a story and said that he was shot because he chased away some locals who were demanding money for a festival. Then they said that some assailants hiding in the vicinity sprayed bullets on him. Then they said that he was shot dead by militant people. Finally they said that he was killed because of an accidental firing by his bodyguard. After that nothing is heard about it.
In this connection, it must be stated that news briefings by police officers and the reports by the media mafias without knowing the truth or verifying the facts is playing havoc to the nation. Some violent incidents in the past could be traced to similar news briefings by the police officers through the public sector TV channel. Even the enquiry commissions are not recognizing this. The act of arresting innocent people in bad faith immediately after some incidents also is equally bad. That these things remain without any remedy is a matter of great concern to the people.
The President of Romania, Mr. Traian Basescu, visited India on 23 October, 2006. A joint statement was issued after his talks with the Prime Minister of India. He called on the leader of the Opposition in the Parliament.
A Union Minister on 24 October, 2006 said that notices had been sent to 90,000 companies. The companies that fail to give the required data would be declared as defunct companies. Further, he said that all companies that raised more than Re. 50 crore from the stock market were being asked to submit the utilization certificate.
The newspapers on 26 October, 2006 said that the public sector Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) would borrow Re.20,000 crore from overseas market through external commercial borrowing (ECB).The paper did not explain the reason why the foreign exchange reserves shall not be given to the SAIL.
A two judge Bench of the Supreme Court on 31 October, 2006 upheld the outright sale of Agra Ashok, a five star hotel of the public sector India Tourism Development Corporation (ITDC) to a private party. The Bench upheld the sale of the hotel by reason of the following reasons.
1. The sale was a policy decision of the Government. As such it is beyond judicial review.
2. The sale was carried out through a fair and transparent process.
3. The interests of the employees were duly protected in the transfer document.
4. The Government got the best price for its shares.
5. The policy decision was not in any manner contrary to the law of the land.
In this connection, it must be stated that no Government could carry out its day to day duties if the policy decisions - taken in good faith - were questioned by the courts.
Therefore, the crucial question is whether the decision is the one taken in good faith or in bad faith. In other words, the decision must have been taken in public interest and not in private interest.
The above judgment contradicts the three judge BALCO judgment. This is because the first point has now no free existence. It is dependent on the four other points. The judges upheld the sale because they believed that the four other conditions were fulfilled although they did not say how the sale could be consistent with the Preamble and Article 16 of the Constitution of India.
The Government resorted to privatization to manage fiscal deficit. When concrete suggestions were given to manage fiscal deficit, the Government could not proceed with the privatization programme utilizing the seal of the Supreme Court of India in the BALCO case. The learned judges were disappointed because the BALCO judgment, for all practical purposes, became in fructuous in the court of the people. The belief of the learned judges that all PSUs would be handed over to private parties through the strength of their judgment ended in vain.
Further, as per a decision taken by the Union Cabinet, no shares of a
The Members of Parliament were distributing the petrol pumps based on a policy of the Government. But, the Court found that they distributed the petrol pumps to their kith& kin. This had the effect of striking down a policy of the Government. This judgment actually opened a way to a boy to distribute petrol pumps to his kith & kin all over India. The people might have noticed the mentality of the learned judges in this case. Obviously, the people suspect that the learned judges delivered the judgement – in bad faith- at the behest of the boy.
The sale of some PSUs could be compared to the following story.
A sells his property to B. For this, A secretly gives his money to B. The children ask A the reason for selling the property. A explains that the property was sold to manage the fiscal problems and exhibits the money to them. But, the children suspect that their father sold the property in bad faith to make B happy. Again, A buys back a fraction of the sold property using all his deposits in the bank and explains to his children that he did it on business principle. The children gaze at the father and wonder whether his actions would fulfill their hopes. The father now holds a fraction of the sold property in the form of shares, the actual value of which is not known to him or his children.
Can anyone imagine a more base, sub-standard and unconstitutional deal than this? On hearing these developments the former President went to the Supreme Court. The present President also went around the Supreme Court. Both the Presidents gazed at the piled-up corpses in different corners of the Supreme Court. However, they returned without burying the corpses. In other words they returned without achieving their objective. This is the reason why the air in the Supreme Court is still “reeking with the sickening stench of the corpses”.
In the sale of the NTC Mills also someone in some place might have arranged money for the buyers. That must be the reason why the Government got the best price for its shares. The court did not recognize the simple fact that anyone would pay a higher prize if he were given money through the back door either as loan or in the name of buying his shares. None need think that the Supreme Court is not seized of this matter. But the truth is that the Supreme Court pretends to the world that it was asked to look at a part of the matter alone.
On 31 October, 2005 the RBI permitted the Mutual Funds (MF) in India to invest up to $3 billion in other countries. Further, the RBI granted permission for prepaying External Commercial Borrowings up to US $ 300 million without its approval. Furthermore, the RBI permitted private companies to park up to US $ 500 million in other countries.
The newspapers on 4 November, 2006 reported that the public sector Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC) would form a joint venture with a
In the meantime, the Union Home Minister said that the Government was not in a position to give security to all citizens.
The Chief Justice of India said that the judiciary should strive to deliver justice to the poorest of the poor. He added that the media was creating confusion among the judges.
The President of India said that the country was going through a unique dynamics where the impacts were felt due to shortage of leadership with nobility. He added that India failed because of an increase of decision makers with small minds. His words show that the President has very limited and precarious authority over the Government. However, none in India understands the reason why the President of India uses hard words like this.
The Supreme Court Bar Association and All India Bar Association wanted the Government to appoint judges after inviting applications, making assessments and consulting other organizations like bar associations. They said that the rule of the primacy of the Chief Justice of India would not ensure selection of the best.
A Union Minister on 5 November, 2006 said that there was no substitute for good governance. He added that corruption was making good governance difficult. On hearing this, one would think that the Union Minister was not the person responsible for giving Re. 100,000 crore to some boys or for selling the NTC mills at Coimbatore.
A Union Minister on 6 November, 2006 directed the banks to re-arrange their loan portfolios. The Minister wanted the banks to meet the rural credit demand and allot 40% of the credit to educational and housing loans –treating them as priority loans. He said that about Re.50,000 crore over and above the normal amount would go to the people because of this decision. At the same time, he disclosed that credits were increasing by 30 per cent but the deposits were increasing by 20 per cent only. Ironically, the Minister said this after directing the RBI Governor to lend money to the Indian Companies to buy assets abroad. Thus, the RBI Governor allowed banks to increase their lending to Indian companies to enable them to buy assets abroad.
The banks exist to give loan. Yet, why did the RBI Governor direct the banks to give credit to buy assets abroad particularly when the deposits do not keep pace with credits? With which money Indian companies buy assets abroad? Should Indian banks give money to the companies located in foreign soil? Did any company approach the RBI Governor or Government for money to buy companies abroad? What is the amount needed? Is there any limit for it? Who is processing the loan applications? Who is the sanctioning authority? Nothing is known to anyone in India. The President of India is also not likely to direct the competent authorities to disclose such details to Indians.
The Union Government had, in the past, illegally given money to private individuals to buy the PSUs. Now, the RBI Governor is permitting companies to remove bank funds to enable private individuals to buy assets abroad. Apparently, the Government did not allow the Union Cabinet to discuss this matter. There is a Parliament also to discuss money matters. Now the Parliament rarely discusses crucial money matters. As the Parliament is not allowed to discuss important monetary issues, it has not so far taken a view over this matter. The people also are not aware of the unfaithful manipulations of the Union Government. Therefore, the manipulations go without any political consequence. To this extent, the orders of the RBI Governor are unconstitutional in nature. The President of India could have directed the Government to seek the approval of the Parliament for such decisions. But the President of India did not do so. The developments show that the manipulators are functioning in the Central Hall of the Parliament just above the Speaker and issuing directions in all directions for manipulating public funds.
What would happen if such matters were discussed in the Parliament? The Members of Parliament might permit the private companies to take their surplus funds or profits to buy assets abroad. Some might argue that some individuals have invested heavily in India and they must be given sufficient funds to buy assets abroad. Some would even get ready to hand over all earnings of Indians to some individuals. But many Members of Parliament are not likely to permit conversion of public funds into foreign exchange particularly when the amount is disproportionately high.
Due to the recent orders of the RBI Governor, the pay revision for the employees would be delayed. The development works would be affected. The workers would not get jobs. The sales would decrease. The revenue would fall. The economic activity all over India would be affected. Murder and robbery in the highways also would proportionately increase. The misery of the people would increase. Naturally, it would undermine the peace in India.
On the contrary, if the money were not given for conversion into foreign exchange, the people all over India would get about Re.100000 crore within a span of six months in one way or other over and above the normal amount.
In this connection, it must be noted that many Indian companies are acquiring companies all over the world. Some buy them on behalf of the companies located in other countries. The acquired companies mostly remain as individual assets and not as the asset of the share holders of India.
Many companies are habitually parking their profits in other countries.
Above all, those who extort money from the banks –about eight individuals in all - succeed in denying freedom of expression and therefore democracy to Indians.
Coming back, an Indian private company said that it would raise $2billion from international markets.
The Prime Minister of India on 9 November, 2006 said that the Government would strive for social justice in India.
Anyone could discern that he President, Prime Minister, Finance Minister and even the RBI Governor are competing with one another to eradicate poverty in India. But none knows with certainty who gave Re. 100,000 crore to some boys. Similarly, the people responsible for the recent orders of the RBI Governor are not known to the people.
In these situations, the President of India must realize that he is a ruler of India and that 1000 million people have been committed to his care. He must realize that all the people are his own people. He must also realize that what he allowed recently is not simple theft but “wholesale butchery” of 1000 million people. It is fast becoming a crime against humanity because the President of India is keeping this work away from the discerning eye of the people. It is the duty of the President to pin point the ambitious men responsible for this butchery. Further, he must recover the money and make it impossible for all future rulers to manipulate the system like this.
Though it is a digression - in continuation of the email dated
In this connection, it may be recalled that as early as 1900, Lord Curzon, the then Viceroy of India, said :-
“India is covered with the visible records of vanished dynasties, of forgotten monarchs, of persecuted and sometimes dishonoured creeds….
Much of the ancient history still remains mere guess work….
Each is a part of the heritage which Providence has committed to the custody of the ruling power”
The facts from 12 October, 2006 to 10 November, 2006 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India on 11 November, 2006.
V.SABARIMUTHU
75
POLITICAL CAREER
On the occasion of the Children’s Day on 14 November, 2006, the Chief Justice of India, along with 21 other learned judges of the Supreme Court, participated in an interactive session with 50 students. The interaction was an unprecedented one. During the interaction, the Chief Justice said that the Supreme Court was not infallible. However, he added that the Supreme Court is supreme because it is final. He described the children as the future of the nation and expressed the confidence that they would certainly build it.
It is the reply of the Chief Justice of India to the email sent to the President of India on 11 November, 2006.
Obviously, the Chief Justice of India is not ready to put right the public wrongs committed by the Supreme Court. However, he said that the children would build the nation. This is the only consolation. Thus he indirectly gave some credit to this work.
Recently, a Chief Justice of India could not hear the BPCL/HPCL appeal case due to this work. The present Chief Justice of India wanted to constitute a Bench to prevent charge-sheeted persons from contesting elections. But, due to this work, he could not hear the case. Yet he says that the Supreme Court is final.
The Chief Justice of India could speak like this because this work remains as a secret document. When this work comes out, the Parliament or a “super body” comprising the students, people and lawyers would reverse all judgments delivered in bad faith.
The Prime Minister, presenting the National Child Awards for Exceptional Achievements, declared that the interest and welfare of children was the top priority of his Government.
On 16 November, 2006 the President of India described corruption as one of the most dreadful maladies afflicting the society. He deplored that corruption had been taken for granted as a fact of life. He emphasized the importance of honesty in public life. He said that dishonesty and corruption were cancerously eating out the life of the society. Finally, he mooted the idea of establishing a new autonomous panel to make corruption impossible in India.
Addressing the above meeting on the next day, the Prime Minister said that the present system that forces a senior citizen to pay bribe to secure his legitimate dues is the most despicable one. He said that stern action must be taken against such corruption. He added that only an alert society could combat corruption.
However, the Prime Minister of India wanted everyone to make a distinction between honest mistake and deliberate wrong doing. He further said that life was full of uncertainty and in that environment, honest mistakes were unavoidable. He, therefore, hated inspection by law enforcing officers. He described the inspection by the law enforcing officers as “Inspector Kingdom”. Thus, indirectly, the Prime Minister of India asked the investigation agencies to ignore the manipulation of public funds in the higher levels.
It may be recalled that as soon as the present UPA Government assumed power, the
Why does the Prime Minister of India talk about honest mistake periodically? Does this appertain to the Re.100,000 crore recently given to some boys? Who is committing honest mistakes? Is it possible for the Prime Minister to commit honest mistakes in cash transactions? Does the Prime Minister want to say that the money given to the boys is not an act of corruption? Is the Prime Minister the competent authority to give money to the manipulators? Will someone again commit an honest mistake and give Re.150,000 crore before March 2007 as demanded by the manipulators?
Even if the private companies want the
Not withstanding the above, the whole process must be consistent with the Constitution of India.
How is it possible to give money to someone without following the above minimum steps?
Now, the President of India requested the national press to transform itself into the media of people and remain as a partner in national development. He wanted the press to celebrate every aspect of the success of the people. He wanted them to work for a corruption- free society. Further, he requested them to ensure that all reporting is analyzed and researched prior to publication.
On 16 November, 2006 the Director,
The Reserve Bank of India on 17 November, 2006 permitted the banks to allot up to 40 per cent of their net worth for stock market exposure.
Apparently, the RBI Governor is again attempting to cut the throat of Indians by allowing the banks to act arbitrarily. Therefore, the above decision also must be debated in the Parliament before execution.
The newspapers on 20 November 2006 reported that Canara Bank- a Public Sector Bank- raised $250 million by conducting a “Road Show” in London. According to the paper, the bank earlier held “Road Shows” in Singapore and Hong Hong in November 2006. The money was raised mainly for funding big companies.
India has sufficient foreign exchange. Why do the banks raise money like this? The President of India alone knows the answer.
The Andra Pradesh State on 22 November, 2006 annulled the sale of 400 acre of land to a private party in Hyderabad. The land had been sold by the previous Government, apparently, in bad faith. Another agreement signed by the previous Government to sell 450 acre of land in Hyderabad also was cancelled. The land contained 10 sports stadiums. The ordinance allowed reasonable compensation with 12 per cent interest. It is clear that all properties sold to private parties in private interest could be restored without any difficulty. The other States including Maharastra and Tamil Nadu could use this as a precedent to take back the NTC mills sold in their areas. The only condition is that the public interest must out weigh private interest.
In this connection, it must be noted that that this writer had sent the copies of some of the emails sent to His Excellency the President of India to the Chief Minister of Andra Pradesh. The President of India also might have transmitted some of the emails to the Chief Ministers.
A Union Minister on 25 November, 2006 implored the banks to provide loans up to Re. 5 lakh to rural and micro-industries without demanding collateral security.
The Supreme Court on 27 November, 2006 quashed a report recommending closure of prosecution against a political leader in a Re. 175 crore case.
A Committee constituted to go into the socio-economic and educational status of Muslims in India submitted its report on 30 November, 2006. The committee found that the Muslims constituted only 4.9 percent of the total 88,44,669 employees. Their proportion in the security agencies was 3.2 percent. The Committee recommended the creation of an Equal Opportunity Commission (
A private Shipping Company of India on 2 December, 2006 decided to de-list the company from Bombay Stock Exchange after obtaining the approval of the share holders. This company had taken a huge amount as loan from the banks.
A big real estate company postponed its Initial Public Offering (IPO) to February 2007. It is its second postponement.
It must be noted that the above Company is one of the biggest real estate companies in India. This company could buy a NTC mill in Mumbai silently. None in India murmured. The President of India alone knows whether the Government gave public money to it to enable it to buy the mill or not.
In this connection, it must be noted that the people in India get loan to buy flats. But the financial institutions do not give loan to buy any land - even 5 cent of land - to any one. Therefore, the act of advancing public money to buy the shares of a real estate company is out and out unconstitutional. However, but for this work, the banks and the
The Prime Minister of India on 5 December, 2006 exhorted the people to play an active role to eliminate corruption from public life.
A private TV channel in its news bulletin on 5 December, 2006 showed the processions taken out by the tribal people in Orissa and Jharkand States against the private steel companies. The agitation took place several months ago. It was not telecast then. Now the TV channels telecast old incidents because they do not want to give credit to this work. It must be noted that even today none in India is ready to tell the reason why the mining sites were not offered to the public sector Steel Authority of India (SAIL).
A Delhi court, on 5 December, 2006 awarded life imprisonment to a former Union Minister and Chief of a political party in a murder case.
A newspaper on 6 December, 2006 said that the President of India should not be a source of aid and comfort to the enemies of the Prime Minister of India.
On 6 December, 2006 a two judge Supreme Court Bench said that sanction from competent authority was not needed to prosecute Members of Parliament or Chief Ministers for corruption. However, they will get protection if the act fell within the range of their official duty.
A Union Minister said that stamp duty for property registration must be brought down to 5 percent. This is consistent with the letter No.4 dated 21-12-2001.
A Union Minister on 8 December, 2006 said that about ten big private and public sector banks gave huge amount to some boys through multiple accounts to buy the shares. He said that the beneficiaries were caught and punished. He added that all the illegal beneficiaries would be dislodged and deserving applicants would be given shares.
In this connection, it must be pointed out that the President of India might have instituted an enquiry based on the letters of this writer and the
However, the
Further, the inaction of the
With regard to the assurance of the Union Minister to transfer the shares to deserving applicants, it must be stated that the deserving candidates are the boys in Assam and Nagaland.
The Chief Justice of India on 9 December 2006 said that high constitutional offices like those of the President, Prime Minister and judges need to be trusted for the progress of the country. However, a former Chief Justice of India on the same day said that, in the recent past, there had been attacks on the judicial system from every corner. He added that such attacks were not wholly unjustified, as there had been definite erosion in the values of the system.
Anyone could see that the former Chief Justice of India justifies all charges leveled against the Supreme Court. This is another success of this writer. Anyone would tell that mere occupation of a constitutional position would not make a man virtuous.
What is the reason for the decay of the Supreme Court? This could have been mainly due to the advancement of some unworthy persons into it. This is the reason why the President of India was again and again requested to disclose the names of the learned judges who got extension of service.
The judgments of the Supreme Court shall not be bad to the extent of forcing the President of India to call on the learned judges of the Supreme Court. But the former President was forced to visit the Supreme Court. The learned judges rejected his good counsel. The present President also was constrained to visit the Supreme Court again and again. Yet, neither did the learned judges obey him nor did they profit by his advice. Then, why did they visit the Supreme Court? Did they visit the Supreme Court for any personal gain? Did they not visit the Supreme Court to put right the accumulated public wrongs? The stand taken by the learned judges during their visits might have been correct. But they did not disclose the reason for the visit of two Presidents. Their omnipotence to keep their visits to the Supreme Court as a private matter was patently unconstitutional and undemocratic. Thus the absence of public opinion is emboldening the learned judges to act in bad faith.
Obviously, those who do not obey the President will not pay obedience to law or Constitution. It is said that those who do not pay obedience to law cannot be good commanders.
Now, those who do not trust the President of India want all others to trust them. This is the present predicament of the Supreme Court.
However, even now, it is possible for the Supreme Court to restore constitutionalism in India. It would be like giving democracy to Indians.
The Parliament on 14 November, 2006 unanimously passed the bill to extend 27 per cent reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in Central higher educational institutions. This should have been done before independence or immediately after independence.
The RBI Governor on 15 November, 2006 through a guideline restrained the financial institutions from advancing any money to the brokers for arbitrage trading. Further, according to the guideline, an individual could avail himself of a loan of Re.10 lakh only from all financial institutions at a given time against physical shares and Re. 20 lakh only against “demat” shares. A few more regulations were also introduced. Thus the RBI, after a long time, indirectly agreed that the banks were quite unconstitutionally giving public money for arbitrage trading and other manipulations. However, the Prime Minister on 17 December, 2006 said that steps were being taken to put in place a strong regulatory framework He added that it would take more efforts and more time to make it an efficient one. The Prime Minister of India feels that more sudden actions might produce an opposite effect. This is perhaps the reason why he says that regulations must be introduced gradually only. Anyone could gauge the depth of manipulations going on in India. A man had to work for five years to unearth them!
The Prime Minister of India had a summit talk with his Japanese counterpart Mr. Shinzo at Tokyo on 15 November, 2006.Nine bilateral agreements were signed. They launched the India–Japan Friendship Year 2007. The Prime Minister of Japan said that his country would give maximum importance to its relationship with India. Later, there was an audience for the Prime Minister of India with the Emperor and Empress of Japan.
A Union Minister and his wife were acquitted by a
A number of companies are postponing the IPOs. Some companies do come out with IPOs but the banks and the
The developments show that this writer has achieved about seven tenth of the objective of this work. The Union Ministers have become fully conscious of their duties. Apparently, they have decided not to give public funds in the banks and the
Further, the Union Ministers might not allow the PSUs to sell their shares arbitrarily to some boys in some regions but would reserve the shares to various States for the UNITY present in the Constitution of India.
However, all the invaded assets still remain with the manipulators. The thieved money also remains with them. Many questions still remain unanswered. Many complaints remain useless. Many grievances remain un-redressed. Many demands remain unfulfilled. Even the students do not get any reply from the banks to their loan applications. Yet, one could think of lowering his desires to the level of his achievements. But, people say that democracy is very important for any nation. They say that only democracy would check private interest. They say that only real democracy would prevent manipulations. But it is not easy to give democracy. It is not easy to protect democracy either. Plato says that “setting aside every other business, the guardians should dedicate themselves wholly to the maintenance of freedom and democracy in the state”. According to him careers must be open to talent wherever it is born.
The Prime Minister of India cannot give democracy to Indians because he would have to quit office, the moment the salient points of this work come out. Therefore, the President of India alone could give democracy to Indians. But the President of India –despite all the actions taken so far based on this work- has also denied democracy to Indians. This resulted in a theft of Re.100,000 crore. This money could have been spread through out the length and breadth of India. Did not the President of India –knowingly or unknowingly- commit a crime against humanity by concealing this work from the people? Some people would ask this question.
However, the President of India could help establish democracy in India even now.
The facts from 11 November, 2006 to 18 December, 2006 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India on 19 December 2006 through email in the profound hope that the President would give democracy to Indians.
V.SABARIMUTHU
76
MEDIOCRITY
The facts from 11 November, 2006 to 18 December, 2006 were sent to His Excellency the President of India through email on 19 December, 2006. Within 24 hours, there were reports that another learned judge would become the new Chief Justice of India with effect from 14 January, 2007. One or two reports conveyed the impression that he superseded eight other judges of the Supreme Court. Apparently, the present Chief Justice got the benefit of extension marring the chances of a few other judges. This must be the repercussion of the above email. This conveyed the impression that the President of India was reluctant to repose his confidence over the judges who got the benefit of extension. The Supreme Court should not be an institution to hide this. It must explain everything to the people.
A former Judge of the Supreme Court on 20 December, 2006 said that judgments should not be personality oriented but should be in accordance with positive law.
As if to wreck vengeance upon this writer for the email sent on 19 December, 2007, a Union Minister on 21 December, 2006 said that the Government would exit from Maruti Udyog Limited (MUL) by selling its 10.27 per cent residual shares following the usual method.
The Chief Justice of India designate, perhaps keeping this work in mind, said if a judge were doing something improper, it immediately gets the attention of other judges. He said that efforts were being made to correct the erring judges. In contrast to the view of the present Chief Justice of India, he said that his work as the Chief Justice of India could be scrutinized. Therefore, he added that the post of Chief Justice of India could be brought within the ambit of the proposed Judicial Inquiry Bill.
Further, he said that the common man should not lose his faith in the judiciary. He said that even the slightest allegation against the judiciary must be checked very seriously. He casually added that there were certain unfounded allegations.
Furthermore, he said that in order to justify the expectations of the people the judges would have to do a lot of things. He added that people were not aware of the limitations of the court or the judges.
The President of India, addressing a meeting in Kerala, said that Kerala is getting Re. 20,000 crore annually from non resident brothers. His words were a reflection of the work of this writer.
The leader of a political party resorted to a hunger strike against the 1000 acre small car project at Singur in West Bengal. The contention of the leader was that about 300 acre of fertile land had been acquired by force. Therefore, the leader wanted the relocation of the plant. The strike lasted 25 days. The Governor of West Bengal, a former Prime Minister of India and many other leaders persuaded the leader to end the fast. But the leader did not listen. The Chief Minister of West Bengal said that he was not in a position to talk to the promoter of the car company in this matter. In fact, none in India chose to talk to the promoter in this matter.
The promoter, however, said that he would not do anything under gun point. This gave the impression that he would relocate the plant if constraints were not placed on him. Finally, the National Democratic Alliance, NDA, alone requested the President to intervene in this matter. Right or wrong, the President of India decided to act in “good faith” and intervened. The leader immediately ended the fast. Later, the mass media, without attaching any importance, said that the President had intervened in this matter well before the NDA delegation met him. However, the hunger strike simply failed although politically the leader might have achieved something.
In this connection, it must be noted that the media mafia had not disclosed the earlier intervention of the President of India in this matter and the Presidential Palace had to issue a statement in this regard later. Even this statement was sparingly reported by the one or two TV channels only and not by the print media.
Further, it must be again noted that the President of India could take crucial decisions when the Government is apathetic to environmental changes.
The Prime Minister of India on 24 December, 2006 deplored that a Non Resident Indian (NRI) remains as the largest steel producer of the world without producing a kilo of steel in India. He was sad that he and an Indian steel producer were forced to buy foreign companies because of the industrial environment in India.
Mr. Saddam Hussein, former President of Iraq, was executed on 30 December, 2006. India described this as an unfortunate incident. Many political parties in India condemned the execution.
Militants killed two people in Jammu & Kashmir State.
Various authorities decided to freeze 20 lakh “demat accounts” with effect from 1 January, 2007 because of the failure of the account holders to give their Permanent Account Number (PAN). One or two newspapers reported this. Does this mean that the banks are replete with fictitious accounts? The President of India alone knows the answer.
On 5 January, 2006, the ULFA militants in Assam killed 42 migrant workers from Bihar and Orissa States. A few more people were killed afterwards. Altogether 69 people were killed within a span of one week. The same militant people kidnapped an Engineer from Tamil Nadu State. They released him after several days.
Killing innocent people is a heinous crime against humanity.
However, the Union Government could think of giving a share in the Neyveli Lignite Corporation (NLC) to the people of Assam before sending a man from Tamil Nadu State to Assam. Orissa State could send their people to Assam after giving a share in their mineral wealth. Now Orissa State hands over its mineral wealth to private parties and sends its people, including the displaced people, to Assam.
Similarly, the Union Government could give a reasonable share of seats in the IITs and others to various States before detailing the armed forces to various places. This would strengthen the UNITY present in the Constitution of India.
On 5 January, 2007 the President of India told the students that he wanted to be known as a teacher. He told them that the best thing was to excel in education and fix an aim and work towards it. He reiterated that one must defeat the problems but should not be defeated by the problems. These words could be with reference to this work.
The National Knowledge Commission on 6 January, 2007 wanted the Government to Start English from Standard I all over India. The State Governments could very easily implement this recommendation by directing the departments of school education to prescribe necessary books. This would eliminate the distinction between English medium schools and other schools. Now the English medium students enjoy a great advantage over others. In fact, one half of the children go to school as second class citizens.
The newspapers on 8 January, 2007 put the amount in Re. crore collected by various companies through IPOs during 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 as 2180, 30511, 22754 and 24141 respectively. Thus the media mafias are purposely introducing an element of confusion in this matter. This gives the impression that about Re.100000 crore given by the
The members of “Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (Assocham)” on 9 January, 2007 wanted the Government to extend political, social and financial incentives while they engage in acquisitions abroad.
It is the first time the corporate houses have openly sought the help of the Union Government to buy assets abroad.
In this connection, it must be noted that even if the corporate houses remove the entire foreign exchange, the people, as a rule, might not murmur. The corporate houses do know that the disproportionate asset cases would proceed against political leaders and officials only. They do know that the people would not bother to know the modus operandi of buying assets abroad.
Further, in India, the real political power remains in the hand of the corporate houses. The political power in the hands of some political leaders is the gratis given by them. They put the political power in the hand of mediocrity to mint money. This mediocrity desires this political power. Therefore, this political power intrigues against the nation to please those who handed over the political power. Naturally, the people are not at LIBERTY to choose anyone other than the mediocrity as their leader. The people are thinking of constructing temples to worship this political power because they have no LIBERTY to know the work of others. The end of the nation must be LIBERTY. But the mediocrity intrigues against LIBERTY to rule India. Obviously, the act of concealing this work is against the basic structure of the Constitution of India.
Will not the people capable of understanding the nature of this work come to the above conclusion? The President alone knows the answer.
It must be noted that the political philosophers like Spinoza consider this as the greatest misfortune of any nation.
Now, contemporary history of India is nothing but the study of the mind of this mediocrity.
The Union Ministers - before assuming power- might have believed that they were democratically elected. Now, they would recognize that they became Union Ministers not because of DEMOCRACY but because of the denial of the same. Even today, they would have to quit office the moment they decide to give FREEDOM to 1000 million people. This is not to say that they are the representatives of the manipulators. But, this is only to say that their leadership intrigues against 1000 million people by concealing this work. Any Union Ministers could rebel against this mediocrity only if they were ready to embrace political isolation.
The President of India could have requested the Union Cabinet to give the reason why this work shall not be published chapter by chapter in the English newspapers and its translated versions in all other newspapers for the DEMOCRACY present in the Constitution of India. Alternatively, the President could have sought the opinion of Supreme Court for the FREEDOM present in the Constitution of India. If nothing worked, the President could have requested the Members of Parliament to give the opinion of the House for the LIBERTY present in the Constitution of India. But the President - despite everything he did based on this work- failed to do his constitutional duty in this matter.
The Supreme Court on 10 January, 2007 upheld the Parliamentary resolution to expel 11 Members of Parliament for receiving money for asking questions in the Parliament. The court held that representing the people of a particular constituency was not an absolute one.
A nine judge Bench of the Supreme Court on 11 January, 2007 held that the laws inserted in the ninth Schedule of the Constitution were subjected to judicial scrutiny. The Ninth Schedule had been introduced to make land reforms beyond the scope of judicial review. The judgment said that the laws should not affect the fundamental rights such as equality of opportunity. According to them the laws should not alter the basic structure of the Constitution of India.
It must be noted that this judgment contradicts the BALCO judgment which held that the economic policy of the Government was beyond judicial scrutiny. Therefore, the doctrine of the learned judges of the Supreme Court in the BALCO case becomes null and void due to this judgment. But the President of India and the Supreme Court must openly recognize it without any hesitation.
The new Chief Justice of India assumed charge on 14 January, 2007. He would remain in office until 2010. He became the judge of the Supreme Court in June 2000.
A former judge of the Supreme Court from Kerala State requested the new Chief Justice to give social and economic equality “beyond the bunch of billionaires who were keeping the country as their private asset”. A newspaper obtained from him this view and published it on 13 January, 2007.
A few judges of the Supreme Court considered this as an opportunity for the new Chief Justice to set right the system.
A new judge of the Supreme Court said that the people were “supreme” in a democracy. As masters, he said, that the people enjoyed the right to criticize their servants including the learned judges. A newspaper on 22 January, 2007 published this.
In this connection, it may be recalled that a former Chief Justice of India had been describing the Constitution of India as “supreme”. Apparently, this work has changed the perception of some learned judges in India. However, the above judge is not ready to leave the people at LIBERTY to know the nature of this work.
Addressing the National Bravery Winners, the President of India on 23 January, 2007 exhorted them to go ahead in life and accomplish “bigger miracles”.
In Tamil Nadu State, the Department of Income Tax (IT), on 23 January, 2007 conducted search operations on the premises of an actor and president of a newly formed political party. It was probing the investment of Re. 45 crore in a hospital. The premises of another person who runs some educational institutions were also searched.
An opinion poll conducted by the newspapers predicted that the ruling Congress Party would secure clear majority with around 300 seats.
On the eve of the 58th Republic Day of India - interacting with the students – the President exhorted them to take politics as a career in large numbers. He said that the people also must select candidates with proven performance with honesty as the focus. The President of India says this based on the utility of this work on one side and the intrigue of the mediocrity on the other side.
The President of Russia, Mr. Vladimir Putin, was the Chief Guest of the 58 th Republic Day of India. He arrived in India on the penultimate day. Unlike in the previous occasion, the Prime Minister of India went to the airport to welcome him. It is customary for the Prime Minister to go to the airport to welcome the chief guest of the Republic Day. However, it is consistent with the letter No. 45 dated 8 December, 2004.
An Indian steel producer on 30 January, 2007 bought the Anglo- Dutch Steel company- Corus- for 6.7 billion pound or Re. 54000 crore. A Union Finance Minister said that the Union Government would help him in all possible ways like getting clearances from the Reserve Bank of India and the Mumbai Stock Exchange. However, he added that the buyer did not make any requests.
On 31 January, 2007 the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) hiked the interest rates by 2 per cent for lending to real estate business, private finance and for stock market operations. The Governor, RBI, said that the decision would curtail demand.
In this connection, it must be stated that the real estate developers would not hesitate to give 100 percent interest. What all they want is public money partly to multiply their income and partly to deny the right to existence of others.
Further, the financial institutions as a rule, do not give money to this writer or to the common man for buying land or for sub-lending or for stock market operations. Any amount not available to X,Y and Z of Kerala, Assam and Kashmir shall not be given to A, B and C of Maharastra , Gujarat and Delhi. Due to this money, the people are not at LIBERTY to know men and matters in India. In the words of Mr.Nehru, this is nothing but cutting the throat of Indians. Evidently, the decision of the Union Government is out and out against the basic structure of the Constitution of India. Therefore, the money given must be recovered forthwith.
Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd (PGCIL) would come out with its initial public offer (IPO) in April 2007 to offload 10 percent government stake in the company. The newspapers disclosed it on 5 February, 2007. Then the Union Government said that Rural Electrification Corporation (REC) and National Hydro-electric Power Corporation also would come out with IPOs to collect Re. 1500 crore.
In this connection, it must be stated that the NDA Government wanted to sell the shares of the PSUs to manage fiscal deficit. This writer pointed out the unconstitutional nature of the sale. Further, concrete suggestions were given to manage fiscal deficit. Then the NDA Government withstood the onslaught of the manipulators and succeeded in protecting several PSUs slated for sale and then abdicated power. Now, there is no dearth of money. In fact, the income of the Government is about 30 percent more than the expected amount. Therefore, the Union Government has taken this decision in bad faith. As the Union Government has arbitrarily decided to give money for stock market operations, the public assets would be unconstitutionally converted into private assets using public funds. Above all, this policy too is responsible for the denial of DEMOCRACY to Indians.
In the mean time, the Union Government sold 20 percent of the shares of the Indian Bank - a public sector bank. There were reports that the Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIB) bought about 60 percent of the sold shares. It was an arbitrage trading.
In this connection, it may be recalled that the NDA Government wanted to sell the shares of the Public Sector Banks (PSBs) saying that they would become unviable due to competition from Private Banks. After that a number of private banks perished. Now, the Union Government is selling the shares of the banks as if there were dearth of money. Any child going through this work would say that the Government is selling the shares to please the manipulators, who protect the mediocrity. If it were not true, the Government would not have stood in the way of the LIBERTY of the people to know this work.
The Chief Justice of India on 5 February, 2007 said that the Supreme Court could review or correct its earlier judgments or judges. This indicates that the Supreme Court would correct the “Petrol Pump”, BALCO and a few other judgments if the President of India were ready to put right the public wrongs.
In another judgment, the Supreme Court directed the financial institutions to follow lawful methods and not muscle men to collect arrears. This is consistent with this work.
In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court said that the Government is free to acquire land - in public interest- to construct Public Sector Undertakings.
In this connection, it must be noted that the Government acquires land from the public, keeps it for some time and sells it, in bad faith, to some private parties at a convenient time. This happened in Mumbai and some other places. The Supreme Court must come out with an explanation for this anomalous behavior.
An Indian private company agreed to buy Canadian aluminium maker, Novelis for $5.95 billion.
Vodafone, the UK telecom company, announced its decision to buy an Indian telephone company for $ 19-20 billion. The Union Minister for Commerce expressed his happiness over the matter saying that Indians were creating assets.
As the Union Government has relapsed to its old unconstitutional ways, the facts from 19 December, 2006 to 10 February, 2007 are being sent by email to the President on 11 February 2007.
This work is of the people of India and for the people of India. The entire work is with the President of India. It comprises about 500 pages divided into 76 chapters. The first two chapters are once again attached herewith in the profound hope that the President would cause to publish them in all newspapers one by one for the LIBERTY present in the Constitution of India. The President could do so after obtaining the opinion of the Supreme Court. The moment the two chapters come out, the entire work would be again sent in one go to the President of India.
SABARIMUTHU
77
“TALI”
The facts from 19 December, 2006 to 10 February, 2007 were sent to His Excellency the President of India on 11 February, 2007. There was silence in Delhi for two days. Apparently, several Union Ministers were not enthusiastic in ruling India by denying FREEDOM to 1000 million people.
The National Security Adviser on 14 February, 2007 disclosed that some terrorist outfits too were manipulating the stock exchanges in India in the name of some fictitious companies.
A Congress party leader on 13 February, 2007 said that the Government had started a new era of economic development in India. While the leader was talking like this, there were reports that the financial institutions, quite unconstitutionally and in bad faith, spent $25.6 billion to buy the shares of a private company. Similarly, the Union Government received about Re. 1000 crore by selling 117,316,700 shares of public sector Power Finance Corporation Ltd. Besides, there were reports that the Government arbitrarily directed the financial institutions to buy 50 per cent of these shares. Obviously, there was unconstitutional arbitrage trading.
The Indian Railways and a big private Bank on 15 February, 2007 signed a Memorandum of Understanding to sell railway tickets. It is not clear whether the Indian Railways sounded the public sector banks or post offices for the same or not.
A newspaper on 16 February, 2007 reported that the Government of Kerala waived the entire stamp duty –about Re. 40 lakh- for the re-registration of 675 cent of land owned by the former judge of the Supreme Court. There were reports that the said property had been given to a charitable institution.
In this connection, it must be noted that the charitable institutions come under “Societies Act” and as such, such properties shall not be given back or divided among the members of the Society. Therefore, there must be something deeper in this matter.
Further, the former judge could have sold 5 cent out of 675 cent to pay the registration fee. Therefore, the waiver is out and out unconstitutional. The people pay stamp duty for partitioning 5 cent of land. In contrast, many corporate houses, apparently, do not pay stamp duty for partitioning their property or to buy or sell shares. Now the retired judges are also getting this benefit. It is consistent with the prediction of this writer that the learned judges of the Supreme Court get the reward for their crucial judgments after a very long time. It is very dangerous. Further, he, apparently, is a representative of the political power that undermines LIBERTY, FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY to the children because of the simple reason that the media mafias are reporting what he says and not this work. Therefore, the President of India must see that stamp duty is realized from him and others for the EQUALITY present in the Constitution of India. Alternatively, the President of India could give any convincing reason for this extraordinary exemption through any competent authority.
A two judge Bench of the Supreme Court said that the court was not a forum for all and sundry cases. A newspaper reported it on 17 February, 2007.
In this connection, it must be stated that a number of writ petitions were filed in various High Courts against the privatization of the BALCO. The Supreme Court, in bad faith, assumed to itself all cases. This writer –watching the mentality of the learned judges- very politely pointed out the constitutional position to the Supreme Court. Yet, the Supreme Court ruled that the economic policy of the Government was above judicial scrutiny. Many judges in the High Courts moaned that the BALCO judgment stood in the way of rendering justice.
The Supreme Court might say that the economic policy could not be considered as the basic structure of the Constitution of India and therefore there was nothing wrong in the BALCO judgment. However, the Supreme Court would now agree that FREEDOM, LIBERTY and DEMOCRACY constitute the basic structure of the Constitution of India and in order to extract the BALCO judgment the manipulators destroyed this basic structure.
The conversion of public assets into private assets using public funds also vitiates the basic structure of the Constitution of India. This is happening even now in one way or other. The present Chief Justice of India might say that these allegations were unfounded. The courts exist to see whether certain allegations have any basis or not. But the system has not so far given any convincing answer to these charges. The logical extension of this stand of the Supreme Court is that it would not murmur if the public sector BSNL were sold to some favoured people–not at all to this writer - for, say, Re 1500 crore, which is a fraction of its real worth.
The Supreme Court cancelled the petrol pumps granted by the Members of Parliament. The Court did not apply the doctrine of the BALCO judgment to this case. This judgment enabled a boy to distribute petrol pumps throughout India. The Supreme Court still maintains silence in this matter.
Similarly, some Public Sector Undertakings were sold to charge sheeted companies violating a guideline for privatization. The President of India might have brought this to the notice of the Supreme Court several times. Yet, the Supreme Court is conniving at this.
Recently, a nine judge Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court ruled that all laws could be scrutinized.
The Supreme Court is conscious of these developments. But its responses are bewildering to the common man. The act of rejecting these cases as sundry cases and delivering contradictory judgments to suit the demands of the time is like acting immorally on the Constitution of India. Therefore, the Supreme Court must review all unconstitutional judgments to put right the crimes committed against the public without further delay.
The Prime Minister of India on 19 February, 2007 launched the Re. 3750 crore Backward Regions Grant Fund (BRGF).
A two judge Supreme Court Bench on 19 February deferred the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the appointment of tainted Ministers in the Union Cabinet.
In this connection, the predecessor of the present Chief Justice of India wanted to mar the chances of charge-sheeted persons contesting in elections. He, in fact, constituted a Bench for that. However, he abandoned that proposal because of the work of this writer. Now, the interested individuals have approached the Supreme Court through another Bench. The present condition indicates the deterioration of the Supreme Court.
Anyone would tell that the word tainted is a relative term. However, all right thinking people would say that those who deny FREEDOM and LIBERTY to children are the tainted persons in a democracy. A few such persons are sitting in the front row in Parliament. They never fail to sit in the Presidential Palace during swearing in ceremonies. The learned judges of the Supreme Court, who refuse to give FREEDOM to the people of India to go through this work, too are tainted people.
68 Pakistan bound train passengers were charred to death in a suspected terror attack on 19 February at Panipat in India
The Union Government decided to sell 49 percent shares of the Bhatinda (Punjab) refinery of the public sector Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd of the Government of India to a
The Union Government tentatively decided to hand over the Chennai and Kolkata airports to a joint venture company of an Indian company and a Singapore based company. The newspapers reported it on 22 February, 2007. Anyone would tell that it is nothing but backdoor privatization.
In this connection, it must be stated that in response to the letter No.1 dated
According to the above guideline, the PSUs shall not be sold to those companies which committed grave crime against the society. The President alone knows whether buyers of the PSUs would come under this category or not.
According to this guideline, the PSUs shall not be sold to those who possess ill-gotten wealth. Whether the Government sells the PSUs or their shares to this category of people is known to the President of India only.
Further, the children would say that the Union Government is alienating the most important asset of the people of Manipur in Tamil Nadu. This is against the UNITY and INTEGRITY present in the Constitution of India. Now, the President of India – a man from Tamil Nadu- would forfeit his moral and constitutional right to enter Manipur.
One would say that private initiatives are important for the prosperity of the nation. But the children would say that public initiatives are as important as private initiatives.
Furthermore, anyone would tell that the Union Government has been shelving all plans for the development of these airports for several years just to give them to these private parties at a convenient time. The people would consider this as robbery. The children would consider this as treachery because the Union Government is doing this by concealing this work from their watchful eyes.
Is there any precedent for this?
In 1727, the King of Travancore became sick and weak. Exploiting this, the armed marauders plundered the people wholesale. Nagam Aiya in the Travancore State Manual says that they did not spare even the tali – the most important ornament of Indian women being the badge of the married life-on the necks of women. Obviously, the children would compare the backdoor privatization of Chennai and Kolkata airports, as and when it happens, to the above incident.
Coming back, a two judge Supreme Court Bench on 23 February, 2007 reiterated that the “creamy layer” from among the reserved categories should be excluded from the benefit of reservation to backward communities. The State Governments, however, submitted that there were practical difficulties in identifying the so-called creamy layer.
It is redundant to point out that the creamy layer of the backward communities can in no way compete with the creamy layer of the forward communities in the matter of scoring marks. As the mark sheet of an individual cannot be considered as the sole index of his ability, a separate reservation is needed to protect the former from the latter. Alternatively, as there can be no equality among unequal peoples, the Supreme Court could have propounded separate quota for every State for the EQUALITY and UNITY present in the Constitution of India. But the Supreme Court is reiterating its new doctrine to the detriment of a section of the people.
The militant people in Manipur in an ambush killed 15 security personnel on poll duty on 24 February, 2007.
After presenting the Union Budget for 2007-2008, the Government declared that Re.2,25,000 crore would be given as loan to farmers during 2007-2008. However, the Government did not say anything about the most important middle portion. As in the past, this is the secret of the Budget. Will the Government arbitrarily ask the banks and the
According to one report, the Union Budget for 2007-2008 provided for disinvestments worth about Re. 41,650 crore.
The above report shows that the innate character of the Union Government is nothing but thieving public funds. This is because of the simple reason that the Government is doing this by concealing this work.
The Prime Minister of India on 1 February, 2007 said that his Government did not do anything wrong. The Prime Minister said this when the Members of Parliament said that the Government suppressed the news of the arrest of Mr. Ouattrocchi for 17 days.
In this connection, it must be stated that the Prime Minister of India enjoys many advantages. He is getting awards and rewards. Children consider him as an erudite person. None would come forward to sacrifice such advantages. However, he does know that he is concealing this work to rule India.
Any children going through this work would tell that the Prime Minister of India is conducting the affairs of this nation in secret. They would say that the Prime Minister of India is concealing the evil secrets of the real political power in India from the people. They would tell that there exists a secret plot to deny FREEDOM to them. They would extend this to the Father of the nation and the first Prime minister of India. They would even say that the learned judges of the Supreme Court were also a part of the plot.
They would not spare even the President of India. They would tell that FREEDOM must be the goal of the President of India. They would say that the President of India is getting ready to leave the Presidential Palace before giving FREEDOM to them.
The Speaker of Parliament, another constitutional authority in India, must be aware of this work. In fact, several letters had been sent to the Members of Parliament. But, he too is not ready to allow a discussion in the Parliament over this work. No wonder, the people like the present Speaker as the new President of India would make FREEDOM impossible for Indians.
In view of the new developments, the facts from 11 February, 2007 to 1 March, 2007 are being sent on 1 March 2007 at 10.45 P.M. through email.
V.SABARIMUTHU
78
THE BASIC STRUCTURE
The facts from 12 February, 2007 to 1 March 2007 were sent to His Excellency the President of India on 1 March 2007 at 10.45 P.M. through email. On 2 March 2007, the Speaker of Parliament - watching the disruption of Parliament by the members - said that he was in great agony. He added that the people were criticizing them.
Later, at Kolkatta, he said that some political functionaries were opposing development merely to stall the development process without showing any alternative plan. The newspapers reported this on 5 March 2007.
Obviously, his utterances are consistent with the prediction of this writer.
Further, it must be noted that the Speaker is not ready to give FREEDOM to the people to know the importance of this work.
The militant people on 4 March 2007 murdered a Member of Parliament from Jharkhand state.
In the meantime, the Chief Justice of India on 4 March, 2007 said that that the judiciary could have committed some faults and concerted efforts would be taken to correct them. He added that the judiciary would not shatter the expectations of the people who repose their faith in the Indian judicial system. The public sector TV channel reported it. However, as this TV channel clubbed this statement with the pending cases, the people might have thought that the Chief Justice of India was talking something connected with the pending cases. Other TV channels and the print media did not report the speech.
In this connection, it must be stated that this is the response of the Chief Justice of India to the email sent on 1 March 2007. The response is a highly positive one.
There are great apprehensions regarding the justice and judgment of the learned judges of the Supreme Court, who got extension of service. Therefore, these judges must be asked to quit Supreme Court to restore constitutionalism in India. This writer is not misusing his FREEDOM to hurt the feelings of the learned judges of the Supreme Court. This is just to point out the constitutional position to the Supreme Court in the light of some bad judgments.
The Supreme Court has not defined the term “basic structure of the constitution” presumably because it has no clear idea about it. Now, it is clear that FREEDOM, LIBERTY and DEMOCRACY are the basic structure of the constitution. In other words FREEDOM is the basic structure of the Constitution of India. The Supreme Court could consider the question of accepting this definition and publish this work for the FREEDOM of the people.
Numerous entrepreneurs all over India borrow money from the public sector banks and the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC). Many perish although some flourish. But a handful of entrepreneurs and manipulators amass wealth by selling their shares to the banks and the
The LIC, in particular, extract money for buying the shares. A few months ago, it collected money in the name of a scheme called “Future Plus”. Even now it collects money for investing in various companies. This is unconstitutional extraction. This money is invested arbitrarily and in bad faith. This causes flight of capital. This affects the safety and security of the nation. This breeds political corruption. This brings misery and violence. This prompts the financial institutions to intimidate and humiliate the common people for their inability to pay just two housing loan installments. It affects UNITY. This vitiates FREEDOM. Due to this, the Constitution of India is becoming less important day by day. Therefore, the public sector financial institutions must be restrained from buying the shares of the favoured companies forthwith. This also is not to hurt the feelings of anyone.
In the above matter also the Supreme Court need not obey this writer at all. It would be sufficient if the Supreme Court were ready to deny the contentions of this writer. If it were not feasible of compliance, the Supreme Court must consider this as the demand of the Constitution of India and as such the Supreme Court must do its duty.
Further, other illegally privatized Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) also must be taken back to restore constitutionalism in India.
Some newspapers on 6 March, 2007 disclosed that the privatization policy of the Union Government was fast becoming a victim of fear politics.
An income tax raid at Mumbai yielded unaccounted income worth Re. 38,000 crore from an individual alone. The public sector TV channel reported it on 9 March, 2007. The date of the raid was not disclosed. On the next day, the print media reported that he had links with political leaders, officials and businessmen. After the raid, the
Not withstanding the resistance of the people, the Government of West Bengal State on 9 March, 2007 signed an agreement with a private company for the small car project at Singur. Based on the agreement, 997.11 acre of land was leased to the private company for 99 years.
The Supreme Court issued a guideline for acquiring land for public purposes. The public sector TV channel reported it on 11 March, 2007. The writer wanted to study the details on the next day. But the print media chose to conceal it thereby denying the people the FREEDOM to know it.
Some newspapers on 12 March, 2007 beseeched the Supreme Court not to undo the harm done to the public due to exasperation caused by the society.
In the meantime, a Parliamentary Committee submitted that no charge sheeted individuals should be prevented from contesting in election. The reason is that there exists a probability for acquittal. The public sector TV channel disclosed it. Other media mafias concealed it.
The Prime Minister said that the Union Government did not believe in conducting diplomacy in public. The Prime Minister said this in a reply to the leader of the opposition in Parliament.
The militant people on 15 March, 2007 killed 58 policemen in Chhattisgarh State. The policemen were sleeping in a police station.
On the same day, police killed 16 people, including some women, at Nandigram in West Bengal. The people were opposing the takeover of land for the Special Economic Zone (SEZ). The Chief Minister of West Bengal said that there was lawlessness for the past two and a half months. However, he owned responsibility for the killings.
In this connection, it must be stated that the media mafias in India did not report the lawlessness in West Bengal for two and a half months although they have been reporting the lawlessness in other countries. Incidentally the leader of a political party in West Bengal State had written a letter to the Prime Minister to prevent the impending disaster. But the media mafias disclosed the existence of the letter only after the killings.
After the incident, the President of India said that no land could be acquired for industrialization by force. The leader of the opposition in the Parliament visited the place of incident along with the other NDA leaders.
Some newspapers on the next day said that the elitists who wanted a stagnant India were responsible for the incident. Some papers insinuated that the economic “elite in India” did the harm. The papers disclosed that a private company, besides its SEZ in Gujarat, got two SEZs –one near Mumbai spread over 14,000 hectare and another at Raigarh with 10,000 hectare.
In the meantime, a Union Minister said that the Union Government would never wriggle out from the SEZ concept because of the bloodshed.
Another Union Minister, presumably keeping this work in mind, said something with the meaning that only educated people would rescue India.
On 16 March, 2007 a learned judge of the Supreme Court declined to hear a case because of the receipt of an anonymous letter. He shed tears while disclosing this.
In this connection, it must be stated that this writer had sent the first eight letters to the learned judges of the Supreme Court. Some letters were sent to the learned judges of some High Courts also. None disclosed the receipt of the letters. The learned judges did not give FREEDOM to the people to know this.
In this connection, the media mafias said that the above judge would retire from service in this month. Did the present Chief Justice super cede him? Now, the people have no FREEDOM to know this.
A young leader of the Congress party on 18 March, 2007 said that the Union Government was spending 40 per cent of its income to the development of Utter Pradesh State alone.
The blood of the people failed to save the land at Singur. The construction of the company continued. People assaulted four judges on 16 March, 2007 presumably for their lawlessness. A country made bomb exploded today in the small car factory. Five unexploded bombs were recovered from the vicinity. Apparently, the people might recover their property through violence or through other methods known to them.
However, it must be stated that Singur is 25 Km away from Kolkatta city. It is actually an urban land. There is treasure within the 997 acre land given to the private company. One cent of land at Singur would fetch Re.100000 within a span of three years. Within 10 years one would get Re.10 lakh for one cent even without this car factory. Thus, within three years the farmers would get Re. 1000 crore and within ten years the value of their land would be Re. 10,000 crore. Those who knew it did not agree to give their property. The ignorant decided to part with the land.
It may be pointed out that today one cent of land cannot be purchased for Re. two lakh anywhere within 25 Km from the centre of Chennai. Anyone could gauge the reason for choosing Singur for the small car factory.
Further, 10 per cent of the shares of the small car factory would be sold through initial public offer (IPO) and the Government would release Re. 100,000 crore through the financial institutions to buy them. A small car costing about Re. 1,20,000 could be assembled and sold for Re. 1,00,000 for a few years in view of this great fortune.
Evidently, in order to suppress the real estate value of the plot, the media mafias plotted to describe the land as agricultural property. The fact that the land is just 25 Km from Kolkotta was disclosed to the people only on 9 March, 2007 through the public sector TV channel.
Furthermore, a car factory need not be within the periphery of a big city to be viable.
Evidently, the lease is like taking the property of brothers, neighbours or others by mere muscle power. This is unconstitutional exploitation of the people using the power of the media mafia. The Union Government is misusing its power to rule India and is plundering the property of the people. Therefore, the lease must be annulled and the land handed over to the owners to restore constitutionalism. The properties acquired by exploiting the ignorance of the people in other places in India also must be restored to the farmers or owners forthwith.
A Union Minister at 9 P.M. today said that a civil war like situation exists in West Bengal. In other words, a civil war is going on in some parts of India.
What is the reason for this civil war?
The principal reason for the civil war is that there is no FREEDOM for Indians.
“The people of India elected us. Therefore, it is our privilege to sit in the front row in Parliament. As their representatives, we know how to run the nation. In order to run the nation, it is our privilege to deny FREEDOM to Indians. But, we will give food and water to them.
We are not in need of the ideas of anyone. Those who desire to give any ideas for nation building may do so. But, due to obvious reasons, it is our honour to use them as our own ideas. We will never give FREEDOM to the people to know the contribution of citizens for nation building.
Apart from seeking food and water, the people could dream of becoming the members of local bodies, Parliament and even Union Ministers. But they will have no FREEDOM to know the work of others. If someone happened to know the work of others, he should not talk about its significance openly, lest we would “strange” him also.
We give FREEDOM to the press. It is
The women and all other neglected sections of people in India would be empowered very soon in all possible ways. But, they too will have no FREEDOM to know about the views of others.
The children are the wealth of the nation. We love them lavishly. They need not contribute anything for nation building. In fact, they need not dream of getting name or money by contributing anything for nation building. If they wanted name or money, they could play cricket or act in cinema. They should have no FREEDOM to know about the work of others.
The people of India could be deprived of their kings because all the kings- both good and bad- gave FREEDOM to their subjects to talk against them. We are not ready to commit the same fatal mistake.
Above all, we are ready to sacrifice our lives for the nation. But we are not ready to give FREEDOM to the people to know the positive contributions of the citizens for nation building. This was the FREEDOM of our predecessors. This is our FREEDOM as well”
This is how those who possess power in India talk to themselves. Obviously, this writer has no FREEDOM to know the work of others for nation building. Similarly, others have no FREEDOM to know the work of this writer. Naturally, those who have no knowledge about this or similar work of others beat the judges –perhaps the innocent judges- and indulge in violence.
The President of India is talking about his teachers, masters and several others. The President is talking about dreams and goals to satisfy the hunger of the students for knowledge. Thus the President failed to give FREEDOM to the students. Now they do not know how their dreams remain “shattered” due to the denial of FREEDOM to them. In fact, as and when this work comes out, the students might suspect a great plot not only to deny FREEDOM but also to control their mind
In view of the lawlessness in India, the facts from 2 March, 2007 to 18 March, 2007 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India on 18 March, 2007 at 11. 30 P.M.
V.SABARIMUTHU
79
PLOTING AGAINST CITIZEN
A two judge Bench of the Supreme Court said that the location of the land and the injury the land owner was likely to sustain due to loss of his future earnings from the said land would be the relevant factors to be taken for consideration while giving compensation for the acquired land.
The judgment is consistent with the email sent to His Excellency the President of India on 18 March, 2007. It might be construed as a coincidence. However, as the State Governments exploited the ignorance and helplessness of the people to acquire land, the Supreme Court must have acted swiftly to restore the land at Singur and other similar places in India to the owners. Alternatively, the court could have asked the Government to compensate the people with land in a place closer to the city.
Further, there are two ways to start a Special Economic Zone (SEZ). One way is to give 30000 acre land near a city to an individual and asking him to make money.
Another way is: Government distributing the land to various industrialists depending upon their need. It would be like the present industrial estates.
Similarly, there are several ways to acquire land. One way is giving about 25 to 50 per cent land to the land owners inside or in the periphery of the SEZ. In this case, there would be no monetary loss to the land owners.
On 22 March, 2007 a newspaper presented the words of a learned judge of the Supreme Court in an article. A learned judge of the Supreme Court said that everyone wanted to “loot” this country and the only deterrent was to hang a few corrupt persons from the lamp-post. The name of the learned judge was not disclosed. The date on which the learned judge uttered these words was also not mentioned. In fact, this is one of the methods of reporting news and views. The newspapers black out the views of very important persons but later –in one or two cases- they realize that the act of suppression works against their own interest. The only way to disclose them is to incorporate their words in an article. The media syndicate discusses the pros and cons of its effect before disclosing them.
The reason for mentioning the words of a learned judge in an article is to give a crude reply to him and, apparently, to the other judges of the Supreme Court. The reply of the paper was that the Supreme Court must “attack the ill-gotten wealth of all those who were or are in positions and power”. According to the paper, the Supreme Court must make all of them to “account for every penny that they possess today”. The paper said that all their assets must be subject to “compulsory verification”.
The article gives the impression that the Supreme Court is verifying the assets of some manipulators. The manipulators, in turn, want the Supreme Court to count “every penny” of the political leaders. In other words, the Supreme Court must devote its energies to catch the political leaders, who possess wealth disproportionate to their known sources of income before looking into the disproportionate assets of the manipulators. Thus, the Supreme Court must pay its attention, for instance, to Re. 44 lakh disproportionate asset of a political leader before looking into the Re.44000 crore deal of a manipulator. The Supreme Court must devote its energies to locate, say, 3 acre of disproportionate asset of an individual before thinking about the possession of 30000 acre of land by another individual.
Obviously, any child going through this work would say that there exists a plot to persist with small cases just to plunder public funds in Re. thousands of crore.
The petrol pump case was the result of a similar plot. The Supreme Court conspired to hand over the petrol pump sanctioning power to a boy alleging that the Members of Parliament distributed the petrol pumps to their kith and kin.
The Government of Tamil Nadu distributed 25 lakh colour TVs to the ration card holders in March 2007. There were reports that colour TVs would be supplied to all ration card holders in Tamil Nadu State.
The Tamil Nadu State could have started a TV channel before distributing the TV sets to save the people from the media mafias.
The purpose of distributing colour TVs must be to give FREEDOM to the people. As this work remains concealed, there is not even 1 per cent FREEDOM to the people of India. Therefore, Government of Tamil Nadu could be a pioneer in giving FREEDOM to the people of Tamil Nadu. For this, it could reveal the salient points of this work and its consequences to the people. This is not to say that the Government would not roll on without this work at all. This is only to say that the TV sets that do not disclose the existence of this work make the people blind. The people would begin to think the moment they get FREEDOM to see this work and similar works of others. When they begin to think, they would take the best possible knowledge for development.
Some newspapers on 21 March, 2007 described the emergence of a young man in the Indian political scene as a “heartening development”.
The above conclusion indicates that the media mafias have decided to put the political power in his hands presumably based on his manipulation value.
This work shows that the office of the Prime Minister in India very often goes to the highest bidder. This bidder runs the affairs of the nation in secret. In order to conceal his evil secrets, he denies FREEDOM to the people. Thus he plots against the citizens. In such an atmosphere, the nation becomes avaricious. That this is happening in India now could be confirmed by four facts. 1. The public money in the banks and the
In this connection, it may be noted that the media mafias kept the past Prime Ministers in the mind of the people only by attacking them virulently. However, they could complete their terms without any difficulty. But none others could do so. A Prime Minister had once advanced the election only to reappear with a thumbing majority.
Now, the media mafias would keep their chosen men in the eye of the people by constructing stories far and against them. As the present young man is contributing his share to conceal this work, they would anoint him as the Prime Minister of India by discussing what he says and by projecting him in the TVs.
In this connection, it must be stated that all boys must come up in life. All boys must be given a fair chance to become the Prime Minister of India.
However, when the media mafias decide to put the power in the hands of a boy, he would not sacrifice this great advantage. He would regard this as a blessing bestowed by nature. It is natural that he would expect the people to accept this as a limitation the nature has so cruelly imposed upon the people of India
Thus, any child going through this work would say that the FREEDOM MOVEMENT was the result of a plot to “loot” India by depriving the people of their FREEDOM.
Now, the nature has bestowed the Indians with eye sight. But they have no FREEDOM to see what his neighbour is doing for nation building. Thus the nation is making the people blind. They have ears to hear. But they have no FREEDOM to hear. Thus the nation is making them deaf and dump. The people are capable of thinking but they have no FREEDOM to think. Thus the nation is controlling their mind. They have no power to realize that the works of their neighbors are being killed one by one.
Therefore, the young man could come forward to give FREEDOM to Indians. Then, India would see a renaissance. In this case, the media mafias would “strange” him. He will have to reckon this.
Why do the manipulators abhor an atmosphere of FREEDOM and LIBERTY in India?
The manipulators abhor FREEDOM because they cannot “loot” the money in the banks and the
Coming back, on 21 March, 2001 some newspapers said that the foreign exchange reserves of India were unnecessarily high. Just as the shortage and excess of air in the car tyre is a sign of trouble, the paper said that that both high and low level of foreign exchange reserves would be a sign of weakness.
In this connection, it must be pointed out that- consistent with the prediction of this writer - manipulators are keeping an eye on the foreign exchange reserves. They simply consider this as the money earned by their own children just to enable them to acquire assets abroad.
Realizing this danger, this writer gave some suggestions. One suggestion was to utilize the reserves to stabilize the prices of diesel. Even now, if the Government were ready to come out of the clutches of the manipulators, all taxes on diesel could be withdrawn. The prize of petrol could be similarly stabilized. The kerosene rationing also could be eliminated forthwith. In fact, a 20 per cent reduction in diesel price would push the growth rate by 2 percent. But the manipulators would not give their green signal to take such decisions.
In the mean time, there were reports that the public sector Gas Authority of India Ltd (GAIL) decided to collaborate with some private parties to give gas connections to the houses in big cities.
It is pertinent to point out that the previous Union Government issued three guidelines for privatization. These guidelines have the force of law. Therefore, the present Union Government and the State Governments are forbidden from collaborating with tainted companies. The President of India and the Supreme Court must see that all agreements that violated these guidelines are annulled.
Further, experience shows that any collaboration between a public sector company and a private company would be an unequal one. All pubic sector companies could undertake such works in India on their own as there is no dearth of money.
A retired judge of the Supreme Court indirectly said that a few learned judges of the Supreme Court were corrupt. The Hindu reported this on 23 March, 2007. This is not a comment of a man in the street. Therefore, the super-ceded judges of the Supreme Court, if any, must be asked to quit the Supreme Court to inspire confidence in the mind of the people.
In the meantime, the Prime Minister of India requested the Indian industrialists to explore the mineral wealth of India.
In this connection, it must be stated that the mineral wealth of one State belongs to the people of other States too. Therefore, all natural resources must be exploited by the Public Sector Undertakings only. This is for the UNITY of India. It must be noted that there is no dearth of money for this.
The Prime Minister further requested the Public Sector Undertaking to tap the stock market.
In this connection, it must be pointed out that it is a good idea provided the shares are reserved for various States for UNITY.
A two judge Bench of the Supreme Court Bench on 29 March 2007 stayed the 27 per cent reservation for Other Backward Communities (OBCs) in the IITs and IIMs for the academic year 2007-2008 because there was no data before the Government to justify the reservation.
The judgement shows that the Union Government could give a definite quota of seats to every State for the UNITY present in the Constitution of India. The question of reserving the seats could be left to the States.
In this connection, it must be pointed out that the Supreme Court is enacting one law after another. Thus the Supreme Court enacted a law limiting the reservation to 49 percent. Then it passed the law of creamy layer. When the system became avaricious, it proclaimed that the economic policy of the Government was above judicial scrutiny.
In an atmosphere of FREEDOM and LIBERTY, the majority opinion has the force of law. As there is no FREEDOM in India, there is no majority opinion and the Supreme Court could commit any public wrong.
Now, it appears that the Supreme Court is a divided house presumably because the new Chief Justice of India is against naked manipulations. Naturally, some learned judges are taking extreme positions.
In the last week of March 2007, Sri Lankan men killed five Indian fishermen from the Kanyakumari district of Tamil Nadu State by firing from a distance of 20 metre. They have been killing Indian fishermen intermittently for the past several years like this.
It is customary for Sri Lanka to put the blame on the LTTE. The LTTE cadres are also citizens of Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka shall not treat them as citizens of another country for this purpose alone.
It is true that Indian fishermen, at times, enter Sri Lankan waters due to water current or wind. India should have maintained contact with all fishermen through satellite or other means to go to their succour.
However, why do they kill Indian fishermen like stray dogs? One reason is that the Prime Minister of Sri Lanka could sit beside the Prime Minister of India without any compunction even after killing Indians like this.
India has business relations with Sri Lanka. As such India cannot antagonize this country. Further, Sri Lanka might turn to China or other countries for its strategic needs to the discomfiture of India. Anyhow, the killings will cease only if India were ready to threaten Sri Lanka with economic sanctions.
The political parties in Tamil Nadu need not withdraw their support to the Union Government over this issue. However, they could threaten to withdraw support to the Union Government for not stopping the killings or for imposing economic sanctions.
In the meantime, an Indian private company bought 30 per cent shares of two Indonesian coal companies for $1.1 billion.
The Chief Justice of India, inaugurating a seminar on ‘Indian Economy: Historical Roots and Contemporary Development Experience,’ organized by the Centre of Development Studies, Trivandrum on 31 March 2007 said that despite the Right to Information Act, information continues to be inaccessible. He added that the common man must be brought into the agenda as there was dreadful poverty and appalling economic deprivation.
In this connection, it must be stated that this writer, on many occasions, compared the contemporary developments in India to the developments in Travancore kingdom. Whether the organizers of the seminar got a copy of this work or not, the topic of the seminar is closely related to this work. It is exhilarating to note that this work is slowly permeating to various levels.
Further, the words of the Chief Justice of India are a partial admission of the fact that there is no FREEDOM in India. Therefore, the Supreme Court might give FREEDOM to Indians. It will be a renaissance for India. It is possible for the Supreme Court. In fact, it is the purpose of the Supreme Court.
It is even now “possible” for the President of India also to give FREEDOM to Indians. The words “dream” and “goal” of the President might have added to the stress of some students. But FREEDOM would never give stress. It would be like giving eyesight to them.
The facts from 19 March, 2007 to 1 April, 2007 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India through email on 1 April, 2007 at 10.30 P.M. in the profound hope that he would make FREEDOM possible for Indians.
V.SABARIMUTHU
80
COMPLETE ASSUMPTION
A young Congress party leader said that he did not want to occupy any position. He proclaimed that his aim was not to become the Prime Minister of India. He revealed that his object was to place others in various positions. The public sector TV channel telecast this on 4 April, 2007.
The above must be construed as his reply to the email sent to his Excellency the President of India on 1 April, 2007.
It may be stated that even now he is the king maker of India. In fact, he could have vetoed the inclusion of anyone – particularly from the Congress party- in the Union Cabinet.
When A likes B, others identify A with B. The first son of Her Highness Rani Rugmini Bayi of Travancore kingdom was a man of middle ability. Therefore, her second son, Ayillim Tirunal, was formally installed on the throne on 19 October, 1860.
The crucial point in the above event is that there were none above the first son to prevent him from becoming the king. No wonder, in his installation speech, His Highness said that he was called upon by the will of God to ascend the throne. As a ruler, Ayillium Tirunal was most enlightened and constitutional in his ways. The promotion of the well being of his subjects was his great object. Obviously, the system had acted “in good faith” to make the second son the King of Travancore.
Does the young Congress leader act in good faith while choosing men for various positions? Why do the people see the representatives of the manipulators in key positions? Why do those who deny FREEDOM remain in key positions?
The young Congress party leader must have many good qualities. However, he could have exposed the dark truth about the system in a systematic way. He could have put an end to the conversion of public money into private money. He could have contributed effectively to apportion the assets and seats among various States for UNITY. He could have contributed greatly to restore constitutionalism. Just as he has FREEDOM to go through this work, he could have shown a way to FREEDOM - a FREEDOM not given by the national leaders. Thus, he could have turned the so called independence into true liberty.
Above all, he could have kept the manipulators and those who deny FREEDOM away from power. Then, the people would have believed that the well being of subjects was his great object.
Why does this work fail to correct the ways of the young leader? Apparently, he is afraid of the manipulators. They would “strange” him. This would have prompted him to ignore this work. Thus he would pretend to give FREEDOM while denying FREEDOM.
Obviously, his present stand is consistent with the conclusion that the FREEDOM movement was the result of a plot to loot the money in the financial institutions by depriving the people of their FREEDOM.
Why should one give importance to FREEDOM? This is because the nation cannot develop without FREEDOM. In other words, the nation cannot realize its full potential without FREEDOM. In fact, in the absence of FREEDOM a man would become an animal. This is partly the reason why a political leader must allow the people to know what he is.
Why does the young leader want to remain in politics by denying FREEDOM to the people? Will it not be creditable for him to give FREEDOM to the people and compete with others to serve the people? The young leader alone could answer these questions.
A newspaper on 7 April, 2007 demanded the Supreme Court not to undo the public wrongs committed by the Supreme Court. In order to convince the Supreme Court, the paper quoted the words of a former Chief Justice of India, that the Constitution of India does not envisage judicial review for the correction of every “wrong”.
Obviously, the paper might have sought the help of the above Chief Justice to issue a statement to inhibit the actions of the Supreme Court. In fact, this writer had used the word “wrong” in several places in this work and he also chose the same word.
Further, he, apparently, might have enjoyed the confidence of the media mafias during his stint in the Supreme Court.
Other newspapers are also standing in the way of the new Chief Justice of India. Thus, in a big centre page article on 12 April, 2007 a newspaper, among other things, beseeched the Supreme Court not to “subscribe to the new middle class instigated ideas”. In order to help the Supreme Court to cover up the circumstances that led to the elevation of the present Chief Justice of India, the paper indirectly requested the Supreme Court to keep “the process of selection and promotion of judges as a closed affair”.
Obviously, the media mafias indirectly demand the Supreme Court to plot against the citizen by denying him the FREEDOM to know the truth.
The array of articles is consistent with the view that grave abuses prevail in the administration of justice in the country and a section of the judges in the Supreme Court would thwart the attempts of the Chief Justice of India to put right the public wrongs. This is partly the reason why the superseded judges do not deserve the confidence of the President of India or the people of India. Therefore, the character of the Supreme Court must be raised by substituting the superseded judges by the appointment of men of integrity. It is possible for the Supreme Court. It is possible for the President of India also.
The Telugu Desam Party (
It must be noted that when the land was given to a private company, the media mafias did not report the matter. Now, as the land is given to a man from Andra Pradesh, that too to the son of the Chief Minister, they use powerful words to thwart it. It is pertinent to recall that when a relative of the Chief Minister Tamil Nadu removed Re. 800 crore from the banks and the
This is the proof for the allegation that a few who possess power divide among themselves the public money from the banks and the
It is clear that when the lands near the cities are given to private parties to start industries, some among those who possess power stand to gain monetarily. Besides, they gain politically as the beneficiaries support them through their media mafias.
In this connection, it is interesting to note that the Chief Minister of West Bengal again and again owns responsibility for the killings of 16 people at Nandigram but refuses to give back the land at Singur.
Inaugurating the conference of Chief Justices of High Courts, the Prime Minister of India wanted the Chief Justice of India not to breach the dividing line between the judiciary, legislature and the executive. The Chief Justice of India in his reply said that the court could not ignore the injustices and illegalities.
Anyone going through this work would tell that the Supreme Court is doing something- perhaps in vain - to put right the public wrongs. Apparently, the Prime Minister of India has no rapport with the present Chief Justice of India for promoting manipulations or for suppressing illegalities. However, the developments in the next few days would be very crucial for the FREEDOM of Indians.
The Prime Minister of India on 8 April, 2007 said that about Re. 15 lakh crore would be invested in the next few years for the development of infrastructure with private participation.
The Prime Minister of India is talking about private participation just to flatter those who put him in power. The Prime Minister transfers the public funds in the banks and the
In a public meeting in Utter Pradesh State, the Prime Minister of India described a young Congress party leader as the future of the State.
The Finance Minister of India on the same day exhorted the people to become entrepreneurs by borrowing money from the banks.
In this connection, it must be pointed out that the Government has been increasing the interest rates steadily for the last one year. This affects the small entrepreneurs. But this helps the big companies because the money available for buying shares is increasing. On one side, the Government refuses to buy the shares of small entrepreneurs and on the other side the Government is increasing the interest rates. The big companies get money without any repayment obligation and the small entrepreneurs perish due to interest burden.
The President of India described the power of reasoning as the most important blessing of God. He added something with the meaning that those who serve the society achieve success in life. A Tamil daily sparingly reported this on 9 April, 2007. But, all other newspapers ignored his speech.
To a question whether he would prefer the chief mentor of a private Company, as his successor, the President of India described the idea as a “fantastic” one.
In this connection, it must be noted that the manipulators would not support the candidature of “chief” of any private company for the post of the President of India. One reason for this is that he would have to remove the money from the financial institutions for his company. It would be –in the words of the TDP party- a breach of constitutional oath and abuse of power. So the removal of public money from the financial institutions in the name of selling the shares would be more difficult. As the public money in the financial institutions is the god of all manipulations, the manipulators would not like this to happen.
Now, there were reports that the Union Government was thinking of approaching the Asian Development Bank and the World Bank to give housing loans at lower interest rates.
The foreign exchange reserves of India have exceeded $ 200 billion. Why do the banks borrow money from the World Bank? The President of India alone could explain the economics behind this matter.
A Union Minister disclosed that there was no dearth of money for starting new projects.
England is discussing the idea of creating four separate nations –England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland – bound only by a common link to the crown. The Hindu informed this to the people of India not as a news item but through a centre page article on 17 April, 2007.
It is not clear whether the early part of this work sent to the Hon’ble Prime Minister of England, Mr.Tony Blair, added weight to the thinking already existing in England or not. What this writer knows is the fact that a copy of “How Everything Happened in India” was sent to the Prime Minister of England on 30 May, 2005 and the latter duly acknowledged it.
The media mafias –consistent with the prediction of this writer- have started writing for and against a young Congress party leader. This is to keep him as a national leader in the mind of the people. Thus, one newspaper on 17 April, 2007 described him as “an intelligent and sensitive person”, another newspaper on the same day said that he was suffering from “the lack of a cohesive vision”. Other newspapers also discussed his statement - his great grandfather secured independence for India and his grand mother split Pakistan into two nations - like this.
In the meantime, the public sector TV channel reported that the Indians forces killed ten unarmed people of Bangladesh when they strayed into Indian Territory. No Government shall kill the people like stray dogs. Emigration of people from Bangladesh started only after the partition of Pakistan. India must probe the reason for this.
A Union Minister on 19 April, 2007 requested the public sector banks to maintain caution on funding commercial real estates and stock purchases.
The above statement of the Finance Minister indicates that the Union Government –instead of utilizing the money in the financial institutions for large scale public investments- unconstitutionally and in bad faith still allows the banks to give credit for sub-lending, real estate business and for buying shares.
A man purchased 50 shares of a polymer company, A, for Re1200. Then “A” was merged with another company, “B”. B offered one share for every two shares of A. Thus the number of shares in the hands of the man became 25. Then, another company, “C” bought “B”. Then C offered one share for every 25 shares of B. As a result, the man got one share of C, the value of which is Re.250. Now, C is going to be merged with another company, “D”. D says that it would offer one share for every five shares of C. How many shares of D would a man possess for one share of C?
Many profit making companies become loss making ones simply by channelizing the profits to sister companies.
Many companies buy and sell their own shares just to hoodwink the people.
The stock market is replete with such manipulations. The Government might have told His Excellency the President of India that the banks and the
Further, any constitutional authority promoting this manipulation is liable for prosecution.
His Excellency the President of India got precious five years to put an end to the manipulations. But he failed to extinguish these rapacious manipulations and injustices. What he could achieve based on about 500 pages of this work was that he could prevent complete assumption of the nation by the manipulators. But, even now it is possible for the President to extirpate the manipulations for the improvement of the nation and the happiness of the people. For this, he must give FREEDOM to the people - a FREEDOM to know this work.
Now the denial of FREEDOM is fast becoming a complaint against the Government, judiciary and the President.
The facts from 2 April, 2007 to 22 April, 2007 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India on 22 April, 2007 at 11 P.M. through email in the hope that the President would give FREEDOM to the people before relinquishing power.
V.SABARIMUTHU
81
A HIDDEN ASSASSIN
Deploring the regional imbalances in the country, the Prime Minister of India on 1 May, 2007 said that India should not depend on a few individuals for its development. He added that he was against ‘crony capitalism’.
The media mafias discussed the implications of ‘crony capitalism’ for a few days to give credence to his words. But the dark truth is that the Prime Minister used the term ‘crony capitalism’ just to pave the way to hand over another installment of money to the manipulators. Thus the Life Insurance Corporation of India (
Further, in order to solve the problems posed by regional imbalances, the Prime Minister could have initiated a discussion in the Parliament in the light of the suggestions present in this work.
His Excellency the President of India, in an address titled “Dynamics of Unity of Nations” at the European Parliament at Strasbourg on 25 April, 2007 wanted to create a ‘World Knowledge Platform’ for providing solution to various problems.
On his way back to India, the President paid a visit to Greece. On landing at Greece, he said that he was overawed by the Greek philosophy. It is natural that anyone going through this work would be overawed by the Greek philosophy.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), on 2 May, 2007 said that it would keep a close watch on all ‘public issues’ of all companies to curb illegal manipulations and to prevent the manipulators from misleading the lay investors. Later, the SEBI set up a panel to suggest suitable measures to solve the problems faced by the investors during the transmission of shares.
Apparently, the above developments are an effect of the email sent to His Excellency the President of India on 22 April, 2007.
However, in order to protect the investors, the SEBI must make it mandatory on the part of the companies to pledge assets equivalent to the amount they propose to raise through the stock market. The moment the share prices fall below the issue price or remain stagnant due to the latent tricks of the promoters, the assets could be auctioned and the money given to the investors. This is what the financial institutions do to the borrowers when they become defaulters. The statements such as –‘investments are subject to risk factors’- are unconstitutional in matters related to public money.
The above rule must be extended to mutual funds and private insurance companies. The amount already invested should be either recovered or converted into loan with usual security.
Further, the SEBI must give an answer to the un-tradable shares and disappeared companies. No man in India shall die with a bundle of un-tradable shares under his pillow.
Above all, the SEBI must forbid the public sector financial institutions from buying shares.
These are the demands of the Constitution of India and any laxity in this matter would be construed as an act of immoral corruption.
Some newspapers on 2 May, 2007 said that the Prime Minister of India is bound by the Cabinet, party, judiciary, Parliament and President. The paper added that the Prime Minister could take any immoral and unconstitutional decision and escape from indictment by attributing the decision to the system. Thus the media indirectly said that the Prime Minister could not be held responsible for the sum of Re.44000 crore given to two boys.
A non resident Indian (
The Speaker of Indian Parliament said that the recent human trafficking case against some Members of Parliament tarnished the Indian Parliamentary system.
As expected, the General Secretary the
In the meantime, a newspaper reported that a former Cabinet Secretary went to work in an organization funded by a private company. He had been functioning as the Cabinet Secretary when the public sector Indian Petroleum Corporation Ltd (IPCL) was privatized. Along with him, another senior officer also joined the same organization after his retirement. Apparently, the successive Prime Ministers are being forced to appoint the officers cleared by the industrial houses in key bureaucratic positions. Alternatively, some officers do favour to the industrial houses in the hope of getting suitable rewards after a long time. Anyhow, the developments show that a shadow secretariat of the Government of India is functioning in a hidden place and this is consistent with the work of this writer.
The Union Government on 10 May, 2007 sold its 10.27 residual shares of the Maruti Udyog Limited (MUL) for Re.2360 crore. At the same time, the Union Government arbitrarily directed the financial institutions including the
A big private sector bank said that it would raise Re.20,000 crore through the Mumbai stock market in June 2007.
Any reader of this work would agree that the above bank became bankrupt long ago. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) also might have told this to the President of India. As such, the President should have advised the Government to take over it. Now, the bank, apparently, needs Re. 20,000 crore partly for its survival and partly for manipulation purposes.
A big real estate company said that it would come out with a public issue on 11 June, 2007 to remove about Re.10,000 crore.
Coming back, a former Governor of the RBI, in his book said that India was becoming more and more oligarchic meaning: of the few and for the few. In this connection, it must be noted that he had to resign from the lucrative post presumably due to this work.
Some unidentified individuals sought the Supreme Court, through a writ petition, to give 100 acre land near Delhi to a private company to install a power plant. Though the Union Government opposed the writ petition, it indirectly wanted the court to give a direction in favour of the petitioners because the reason for giving the land to the private company could be attributed to the Supreme Court. The case was heard by a two judge Bench. The Economic Times reported this on 5 May, 2007. This writer quite accidentally noticed it.
The crucial point in this case is that many other newspapers did not report it. The verdict too was not reported.
The media mafias black out the arguments of such cases in the Supreme Court as if they were dark knowledge.
It is pertinent to recall that the media mafias did not report the privatization of Delhi Electricity Board. When Mumbai Electricity Board was privatized, the people of India were not aware of it. The concept of Special Economic Zone (SEZ) came to light only when a newspaper propounded it as a reaction to the killings in West Bengal. Now, the people of India have no FREEDOM to hear the arguments of the cases in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court should not hesitate to direct the media mafias to report its proceedings and verdicts.
A private company on 5 May, 2007 demanded more land near the existing plant at Dharwad in Karnataka State for the production of commercial vehicles. The State Government obliged and gave 300 acre immediately.
In this connection, it must be stated that all companies that got land from the Government must be forbidden from selling the land to third parties through transfer of shares or through other means. The companies shall use the land for the slated purpose only. The companies shall not sell the land for housing purposes also. The property shall not be divided among the share holders of the companies. When a company is closed or liquidated, the land must go back to the Government. This is the demand of the Constitution of India. It must be noted that no State Government is giving land to any small investor for starting an industrial unit or an institution.
Perhaps watching the progress of this work, a newspaper on 6 May conceded that all dissenters start out as isolated individuals but gain momentum by harping on and on a central point.
The UP State Assembly election results were declared on 11 May, 2007. The BSP party got 206 seats out of 402 seats. While conducting the elections, the Election Commission of India enacted a coup against itself by conniving at the disproportionate publicity given to one or two leaders by the media mafias particularly the public sector TV channel. The leaders might not have solicited the support of the media mafias is a different matter.
The President of India on 11 May, 2007 said that all citizens should contribute their share for the development of India. Keeping this work in mind, he exhorted the people to fight for the second FREEDOM struggle.
The Speaker of Parliament on 12 May, 2007, presumably after going through this work, said that the whole political structure was weakening because the people were getting disillusioned.
BUSINESS
In this connection, it must be stated that the auction might enjoy the backing of the President of India and the Supreme Court of India. Yet, the act of acquiring private properties for public purposes and selling those to private parties is out and out unconstitutional. All properties already sold in this way must be taken back.
The income tax authorities raided two Educational Trusts running self financing colleges in the Tamil Nadu State and unearthed undisclosed income worth Re. 27 crore. At the same time, there were reports that the top industrial houses were under assessed for tax. Yet, the competent authorities did not carry out any raid in their premises. Any small amount is like a sugar cane to the income tax authorities!
Some newspapers on 18 May, 2007 disclosed that the
In this connection, it may be reiterated that giving money to some companies in the name of buying shares is an immoral and unconstitutional act.
A Union Minister said that some industrialists had been unduly influencing the direction of the Union Government ignoring the interest of the masses. He wanted the Union Ministers to be conscious of the demands of the masses, lest the Government would lose the support of the people. The newspapers have been giving great importance to his utterances.
The statement of the above Union Minister justifies this work.
However, it must be stated that two Congress party leaders enjoy mass support in Tamil Nadu State. They are functioning in the rank of Minister of State only. Yet, the above Union Minister, hailing from Tamil Nadu, could become a Union Cabinet Minister when the present Government came to power.
Now the media mafias are not reporting the views of the two Congress leaders from Tamil Nadu State. The opinions of many Cabinet Ministers are not coming out. The politics being played by the leaders of the opposition parties are ruthlessly suppressed. The constructive views of the common man are also blacked out. Apparently, the media mafias are taking a concerted effort to make the above Union Minister a future Prime Ministerial candidate.
The President of India on 23 May, 2007 requested the political leaders to put the nation before themselves and their relatives.
The newspapers on 26 May, 2007 reported that the 20 cash rich Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) would invest their surplus funds –about Re. 2.5 lakh crore- in the public sector Unit Trust of India (UTI) and private mutual funds.
In this connection, it may be recalled that the United Front (UF) Government at the Centre, apparently, diverted the surplus funds in the PSUs to the
Now, the media mafias say that the Airport Authority of India (
This work failed to stop Re.44000 crore going into the hands of two boys. This work, apparently, did not succeed in recovering the money either. This work has not restored constitutionalism in India. The President of India, Supreme Court and the law enforcing agencies also failed to do their duty. For the same reasons, FREEDOM is becoming elusive to Indians.
Therefore, one might be forced to accept the present predicament as an inherent limitation of nature.
Not withstanding everything, this writer –a citizen of India- firmly believes that India could be converted into a constitutional nation.
The Constitution of India demands that all constitutional authorities including the President of India and the learned judges of the Supreme Court must be severally and collectively prosecuted whenever public funds are arbitrarily invested in any place. The Constitution of India does not guarantee immunity for any constitutional authority for acting in bad faith.
The BSP Government in the UP sought the help of the Union Government to cancel the Special Economic Zone granted to an industrial house.
Twenty seven people were killed when the police opened fire during agitation by the people of Gurjar community in Rajastan State. The people were demanding a separate quota for them in educational institutions. The firing shows that State wise, Parliamentary constituency wise and Assembly constituency wise reservation would solve 90 per cent of the problems regarding reservation. Until then, cannibalism would continue like this.
A Member of Parliament of the BSP party was arrested on 30 May, 2007 for forcefully occupying a piece of land. At the same time, the Government of Kerala started proceedings to recover 3113 acre land encroached by a tea company. A daily from Kerala, on 8 June, 2007 said that an individual was in illegal possession of 50,000 acre of land in Kerala State alone! Perhaps the land is not being used for the intended purpose. At Singur, the Government of West Bengal removed the land from the people and gave it to another individual. Evidently, the Members of Parliament are the weakest people in the eye of the law enforcing agencies.
A big real estate Company came out with its public issue on 11 June, 2007. The issue closed today. To the utter disappointment of this writer, the newspapers said that the financial institutions queued up to buy the shares. The Economic Times also reported that the public sector banks had been spending money lavishly to buy the shares.
In this connection, it must be noted that the Union Government has been turning the boys all over India into anti-social elements by denying them loan for real estate business. It is due to a plot to siphon off money to a few individuals for real estate business. Evidently, the act of giving public money to the real estate company is out and out unconstitutional.
Similarly, the Union Government has been turning the boys all over India into chain snatchers by denying them loan for sub-lending. Buying the shares of any private bank is akin to giving loan for sub-lending and therefore unconstitutional. It is the duty of the President to see that the banks do not part with their money in the name of buying the shares of the above bank.
The timing for the removal of Re.10000 crore by the real estate company and another Re.20000 crore by a private bank must be noted. It is the time when the people would be diverting their attention to the next Presidential election. This is how thefts take place.
The above two companies had postponed their public issues on two occasions presumably due to this work. Now, as the President of India has become very weak, the above companies believe that the climate is very congenial to remove public funds. Therefore, it is nothing but robbery and treachery. It is the duty of the competent authorities including the President of India and the Supreme Court to recover the money given to the real estate company and avert the other impending disasters.
Anyone going through this work would tell that there exists an appalling plot to remove the public money from the financial institutions by denying FREEDOM to Indians. In this matter, the Prime Minister would claim that he is better than the President of India. The President of India would expect the people to believe that he is more moral than the Prime Minister of India. The Speaker of Parliament would tell that he did not get any opportunity to ‘snuff out’ FREEDOM from Indians. The Chief Justice of India would murmur that his object was to achieve everything without disturbing the system. The Election Commissioners would say that their duty was conducting elections and not making the voters aware of the contributions of the citizens for nation building.
“One may be more moral or better than the other due to some ‘minor twist of fate’. But every constitutional authority in India today is a hidden assassin of FREEDOM”. All children going through this work would cry like this because their contributions to the society do not get as much attention as cricket matches or murder cases, suicide cases and human trafficking cases.
But, even now it is possible for the President to give FREEDOM. In fact, a two judge Bench of the Supreme Court on 11 May, 2007 ruled that the decisions of the President could be questioned only by Parliament and not by courts.
The moment FREEDOM is given; the people would be at liberty to know this work. As a result, the nation would become a constitutional one and all illegal mega manipulations would come to an end.
Further, the people would opt for a President not based on what he is capable of doing but based on what he has already done for nation building. All political leaders might be enlightened by public opinion. Naturally they might accept public opinion as public duty.
Furthermore, when an individual goes through this work or similar work of others for nation building, it might instill envy and hatred. But when the masses get FREEDOM to go through this work or similar work of others, it would generate admiration. The opinion of the people- and not the favour of the manipulators- would be then a passport to become the next President of India.
This work has not achieved everything. However, unless otherwise denied with supporting documents, the people would tell that the contribution of this writer for nation building is greater than the contributions of all successive Presidents put together. As this work till remains concealed, they would tell that the President of India and the learned judges of the Supreme Court plotted against citizens to mar their careers. This is the most important consequence of giving FREEDOM.
Now, the Supreme Court would tell that the impending Presidential election would be null and void because the people of India or their representatives have no FREEDOM to know the labours of various people for nation building. The court would tell that without FREEDOM to know men and matters or news and views there would be no free and fair election.
Therefore, the President of India must give FREEDOM to the people before conducting the presidential election. The act of electing a President without giving FREEDOM to the people is treachery and robbery. It is unconstitutional. Anyone entering the Presidential Palace after denying FREEDOM would make FREEDOM impossible for the people. Entering the Presidential Palace through the back door would not do credit to anyone.
The ruling UPA today unanimously decided to field the Governor of Rajastan, as its presidential candidate. The Governor said that she was greatly honoured by the offer. The media mafias immediately supported her candidature. Even the Siva Sena Party, an opposition party, declared that it would consider the question of supporting her.
The facts since 23 April, 2007 are being sent today, 14 June 2007, at 9.45 P.M. through email in view of the momentous developments.
V.SABARIMUTHU
82
Mrs. Pratiba Patel, the UPA nominee for the presidential election, said that the decision of the UPA to field her for the post of the President of India came as a pleasant surprise. She disclosed that she did not expect that the leaders would consider her name for the highest office. A daily, Thina Thanthi, from Tamil Nadu State reported this on 15 June 2007. However, her brother knew that she would be selected for the top post. The public sector TV channel telecast his words on 14 June, 2007. Perhaps, her relatives guessed it. Alternatively, she had been selected long before the leaders of the UPA zeroed in on her.
The UPA nominee on 16 June, 2007 said that she, as President of India, would not be a rubber stamp. She added that she had her won independent thinking.
The public issue of the big private bank opened on 19 June, 2007. The issue was subscribed 11.5 times. Thus it could unconstitutionally rob more than Re. 20,000 crore easily. The financial institutions bought the shares arbitrarily. Thus more than 500 pages of continuous work spanning six years went in vain. In the absence of this work, this bank alone would have removed Re. 2,00,000 crore from the banking system is another matter.
In this connection, it must be reiterated that the act of investing public money arbitrarily in shares is illegal and unconstitutional. This money has been creating leaders in India right from the days of Gandhiji. These leaders have been commanding the respect of the world because people consider them as the natural leaders of India. No wonder that this money is keeping them above humanity. This gives pleasure to them because they desire it.
But, this leads to flight of capital.
This inhibits public investments.
This affects the salaries of employees.
This instills regionalism.
This causes economic deprivation.
This aggravates unemployment.
This breeds terrorism.
This conceals the work of this kind.
This decides the nature of the political leadership.
This denies FREEDOM and hence weakens DEMOCRACY.
Above all, this is the mother of all manipulations.
Therefore, it is the mother of all acts of corruption.
Who could have perpetrated such horrendous crime against humanity? What kind of heartless man could have given the money? Did the outgoing President of India give the money in the hope of getting one more term? Could it be ascribed to the leaders of the coalition parties? Could it be due to the uncontrollable greed of the Union Ministers? Could it be due to the desire of one or two other leaders?
All right thinking people would tell that it is the paramount responsibility of the Prime Minister of India to protect public money. But, he gave the money to his promoters without the slightest compunction. It is a crime against humanity because he did it keeping this work away from the discerning eye of the people. Therefore, it is imperative that the present Prime Minister of India must be dismissed and a new leader commanding majority support invited to lead the Nation. The only condition is that the new leader should not be a seeker of public fund.
Alternatively, the new President of India could think of converting India into a constitutional nation. For this, all illegally privatized Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) should be taken back. The
The third option is giving FREEDOM to the people. Now, the new President has the FREEDOM to go through over 500 pages of this work. As knowledge is power, the President could impart this knowledge to the women through any competent authority. Then they would come to know the factors that affect their progress. The wave of public opinion created in this manner would force the Government to recover the money.
Still another option is doing something as per the dictates of the reason of the new President of India. The only condition is that the action of the new President of India based on her reasoning must be understandable to the common man.
The new President of India could reject all suggestions to avoid controversy. But, a wicked woman alone would cope with the present wickedness of the surroundings.
The President of India on 20 June 2007 said that he would offer himself as a candidate for the presidential poll if there were certainty of winning the election.
A sage told Mrs. Pratiba Patel 38 years ago that she should be prepared to shoulder greater responsibility. Mrs. Pratiba Patel, on 26 June 2007, disclosed it.
Though it is a digression, it must be pointed out that the new Prime Minister of England, Mr.Gordon Brown, on 27 June, 2007 said that he wanted best of chances for everyone. He promised a new era in British politics through listening and learning.
Coming back, a Co-operative Bank set up by Mrs. Pratiba Patel, gave Re. 2,24,49,150 in the form of “unlawful loans” to her relatives. When the bank was liquidated, the depositors lost their earnings. Further, a sugar factory set up by her did not pay back Re. 20 crore taken as loan. The New Indian Express published these particulars on 28 June, 2007.
On the next day, the same paper revealed that her husband created unbearable situation to a teacher working in the school set up by him. Eventually, the teacher committed suicide.
Then the same paper said that her brother allegedly conspired to murder a Professor. He could escape because of her high position.
On the fourth day, the paper concluded its findings certifying that the present Prime Minister of India as “a financially honest person”.
A former Union Minister in the NDA Government, had been writing this for The New Indian Express. Ironically, during his time, the Bank of India gave Re. 845 crore to an individual to enable him to buy a Public Sector Undertaking (
With regard to the charges, it must be noted that if Mrs. Pratiba Patel had sold 10 per cent shares of her Co-operative Bank with the blessing of her leaders, she could have plundered Re.1000 crore from the public sector banks. With that money, she could have bought several small banks and converted her bank into a big private bank.
Similarly, she could have sold 10 per cent shares of her sugar factory and robbed Re.1000 crore from the banking system. She could have bought some factories abroad with that money. As she chose not to amass wealth in this way, the media mafias are not ready to admit her in their ranks.
There was a charge that the poor women lost their earning by depositing their money in the Co- operative Bank set up by her. Now, new President of India has a marvelous chance to make amends for it. All private banks in India run by individuals or trusts must be directed to pledge assets equivalent to the deposits. This rule must be extended to all private parties extracting public money. This is only to prevent them from running away with the money.
Now, people do rise up. But, they are being constantly pulled down by private bankers. In every district in India, a few gentlemen run away with the deposits every year. The police and the court run after them for some time. Those who lose the money either die or lead a “living death”. The new President of India should not allow this to happen to her subjects.
Similarly, numerous people in every generation are being pulled down by the stock market. In fact, several experts in stock market operations loiter in the streets with begging bowls. The new President should see that her subjects do not become new victims. For this, the people must have the knowledge of this work. Further, there must be a guarantee to give back the invested amount not withstanding the vagaries of the stock market or the policies of the Government.
With regard to the question of “creating unbearable situations” to teachers, the new President could prevail upon the Union Government to introduce direct payment of salaries to teachers in self-financing institutions all over India. This would not inhibit private initiatives at all. The private management could be asked to remit the PF, salary and pension components of the fee alone into the treasury.
There was a mention about a murder. It would have been far easier for the rulers to give, say, Re. 10000 crore to her through the stock market or through commissions than interfering in a murder case.
Finally, the former minister declared the present Prime Minister of India as a financially honest person. It must be noted that he did not give such a good certificate to the former Prime Minister of India. In fact, he was disgusted with his leadership. This is what the money does in India.
Presumably keeping this work in mind, some newspapers on 29 June, 2007 said that the judiciary in India was facing multi-pronged attack. As the Supreme Court is still keeping this work as a secret document, it is denying FREEDOM. Naturally, it lost its lusture long ago.
The spokesperson of the other presidential candidate, Mr. Bhairon Singh Shekhawat, on 3 July 2007 said that he worked as a Sub-Inspector of Police from 1942 to 1948 and that he was not suspended from that job. The spokesperson produced a discharge note that praised Mr.Shekhawat.
In the mean time, the media mafias disclosed that the State Bank of India (SBI) would mobilize Re.50,000 crore in December 2007 through the stock market by selling its shares. Thus it would realize a fraction of its net asset value while selling its shares to ‘x’. At the same time, it would buy the shares of ‘x’ by giving money several times over and above its net asset value.
The above revelation shows that rank corruption and misuse of power is pervading the whole system. Obviously, the Union Government is using its mandate to plunder the nation.
Those who deny this must exhibit their courage by allowing the entry of this work into the consciousness of the people.
It is pertinent to point out that the SBI has not disclosed the amount collected in the name of “Resurgent India Bond” and the way in which it utilized this money.
On 28 June ,2007 a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed by a private company and the Government of Tamil Nadu State to set up a Re.2500 crore titanium dioxide plant in Tamil Nadu. The Government of Tamil Nadu would give 12000 acre of land for mining purposes. Immediately a leader of a political party in Tamil Nadu State, demanded the Government to undertake the mining after annulling the MoU.
Mrs. Pratiba Patel on 1 July, 2007 said that she was aware of the stupendous responsibilities, if elected to the office of the President. Further, she denied the allegations against her as false.
Some newspapers on 2 July, 2007 said that Mrs. Pratiba Patel would go down as the most controversy-ridden President. The media mafias fear that she would be a woman of reason. Their apprehension is that her reasonable actions based on this work would lead to the liberty of the people. However, future alone would tell whether this conclusion is right or wrong.
Mrs. Pratiba Patel on 4 July, 2007 said that she had endeavored to be true to her conscience during her public life. Anyone true to his/her conscience would be
Mrs. Pratiba Patel on 5 July, 2007 said that her victory would be a victory for millions of citizens. She added that she was deeply conscious of the “awe-inspiring responsibility of the office of the President”.
On 6 July, 2007 Mrs. Pratiba Patel said that her commitment to secular and democratic values got strengthened due to the malicious campaign of the opposition. She declared that she would uphold liberty and equality. Besides, she promised that she would secure social, economic and political justice. She thanked the Congress President, the Prime Minister and the other leaders of the UPA for fielding her for the highest office.
In this connection, it must be noted that the words used by Mrs. Pratiba Patel during he canvassing were reminiscent of the words used by this writer. However, it is not clear whether the outgoing President of India had been transmitting this work to her as a Governor of a State or not.
A newspaper on 6 July, 2007 beseeched the General Secretary of the CPM to take action against the Chief Minister of Kerala State for threatening to take back the plantations leased to a big industrial house. Ironically, the media mafias extracted the BALCO judgement from the Supreme Court to their advantage. Now the same judgement tends to go against them.
The New Indian Express on 7 July, 2007 disclosed that the co-operative bank set up by Mrs. Pratiba Patel paid Re. 20 lakh towards telephone charges. But the telephone had been used by her brother for stock market operations. Another charge was that she caused diversion of the Local Area Development Fund allotted to the Members of Parliament. The paper reiterated several charges and used very strong words - not used by this writer like “fraud, protecting offenders, murder, tax evasion, breach of social justice rules” – to describe her or her relatives. This time, the paper fielded another writer to write the article.
At Kashmir, Mrs. Pratiba Patel said that the people wielded ultimate power in India. She added that she had been working for rural development and women empowerment for five decades. Earlier, the Chief Minister of Jammu & Kashmir said that she would give a new direction to India.
A newspaper on 8 July, 2007 said that a Congress leader was moving with shrewd calculation, keeping the future in mind. The paper declared that the Congress leader deserved it.
The new Union Minister for Communication contended that the Government would lose Re.10000 crore, if the tender finalized by the public sector BSNL were accepted. It must be noted that when the tender was finalized another man was the Minister for Communication.
The employees of the BSNL resorted to a lightening strike for one day saying that the new Minister was strangulating the BSNL to the advantage of private players. This gave the impression that the senior members of the BSNL board had a sinister hand in the tender. The strike led the new Minister to the retort that Re. 30000 crore stagnating in the BSNL would be used for the development of the BSNL.
The Prime Minister of India was shocked by the developments. In what manner he wanted the new Minister to go along the decision of the BSNL board was not clear. But he openly appealed to 1000 million people of India to give greater functional autonomy to profit making PSUs. This gave the impression that the Prime Minister was part of a plot to cause a loss of Re.6500 to 10000 crore to the BSNL in one tender alone.
It may be recalled that when the NDA Government re-negotiated a tender for the BSNL, the gain was about Re.200 crore. Now the gain is in the order of Re. 6500 crore! Anyone could remain as a political and economical power with this money for generations.
When some boys were inducted into the present Union Cabinet, many felt that they would prevent all acts of corruption all over India. Did they think of amassing wealth in the order of Re.6500 crore? No wonder that the former Minister sought an enquiry in vain to clear his name.
Eventually, the new Minister cancelled the tender and initiated new negotiations by reducing the quantity of the tender. This would be sufficient for the BSNL for the next 15 months. The decision, according to him, saved Re.6500 crore to the BSNL.
The decision of the new Minister to use the surplus funds in the BSNL also is a daring one. The Prime Minister had wanted to put the money in the
Apparently, the Minister is not a seeker of public funds. Otherwise, he would not have acted as per the dictates of his reason. In fact, all right thinking people all over India would be proud of him. But, this should not end as a one day event. The position one occupies is not very important. What one does after occupying a position is very important. He must go ahead like this.
However, the journey is a very perilous one for a politician. The present system demands that a leader in India should be capable of playing a dual role. He must give public money to a few individuals either through stock market or through commissions while pretending as a champion of the neglected sections of the people. The media mafias would “strange” all others under one pretext or other. When it is a Union Minister, even his colleagues would reject him as a man without any practical wisdom.
Further, the former Union Communication Minister said that some
It is pertinent to recall that a suggestion was given in the first letter dated 1-6- 2001 to split the BSNL and hand over it to the States. Had this been accepted, every State in India would have been in the possession of a company as big as any other private company. The question of buying the equipments would have been the concern of State Governments.
In the meantime, the Defense Minister wanted to make all weapons in India.
It is pertinent to note that the manipulators would try to outwit the Defense Minister. Therefore, at least two different independent but confidential panels specially set by the Defense Minister must study every deal before signing. This is to see that none in the UK or any other place get huge commissions while clinching defense deals. Already, there is a demand from the USA to re-open the contract to buy 197 helicopters. This is not to say that the Defense Minister must desert the Union Cabinet at all. This is only to say that the people do not feel his positive contributions in the Union Cabinet.
There are many complaints of corruption in the works going on in the National Highways also.
It may be recalled that another suggestion given in the first letter dated 1-6- 2001was to award contract works in pieces. Had this been agreed, all expansion works in all National Highways could have been completed within a span of two or three years.
All workers all over India should get jobs in the work of this kind. Thousands of boys all over India should become new contractors. But not even one big contractor has been created in every district through this work! The Union Government is depending on a few contractors to finish this work all over India. This gives the impression that the Union Government has an eye on huge commissions. The Union Government must dispel this impression and strive to create new contractors by awarding works and granting loans to buy equipments. The Union Government must trust the capability of the people in this regard, lest it would breed terrorism.
The terrorists killed 25 policemen in the Chhattisgarh State on 10 July, 2007. Immediately, the Union Home Minister said that he would talk to the terrorists if economic reasons were behind their killings.
On 10 July, 2007 Mrs. Pratiba Patel promised to work for the empowerment of women. She said that 19 July, 2007 would be a momentous day in the history of the country should she get elected. On the same day, the BJP created a website containing the allegations against her. It would vanish as soon as the election results were announced.
Mrs. Pratiba Patel on 15 July, 2007 said that she would serve the country and the people with outmost sincerity. Everyone must trust that her words would not go without any meaning.
Awarding two months jail to a contemnor, a two judge Supreme Court Bench on 18 July, 2007 said that any statement by anyone designed to lower respect of the judiciary and destroy public confidence in it would not be permitted because the entire democratic set up would crumble down. The court, however, added that temperate criticism of the court even if strong might not be actionable.
In this connection, it must be noted that the people do believe that the learned judges of the Supreme Court are supremely men. But, what do they do for giving FREEDOM to Indians? If there were no FREEDOM, what is the meaning of democracy? The learned judges must give answers to such questions.
As the Union Government had been investing in shares in the name of the President of India, a newspaper on 19 July, 2007 described the President of India as the custodian of shares worth Re. 7,00,000 crore. The money had been invested in 60 listed companies of a few individuals. The value of these shares in July 2003 stood at Re.11800 crore. The holdings under the name of the President represented 15 percent of total share price. The amount of un-tradable shares was not revealed. Why did the President extinguish several other companies through his refusal to buy their shares was also not explained. The paper did not disclose the amount invested by the
In this connection, the new President must explain to the people the reason why the Union Government resorted to sell Public Sector Undertaking (PSUs) or their shares for want money while keeping these shares.
There are reports that 5 percent of the pension fund would be invested in shares.
The pension fund is the most sacred fund. All employees - public and private- must be pensioners after a certain age for the stability of the society. The pension fund must be utilized for pubic investments and for the payment of pension. It is out and out unconstitutional to put the pension fund arbitrarily in shares.
One would say that the Government is investing arbitrarily in shares with the permission of Parliament, Supreme Court and the President of India.
The above argument is valid only when the people enjoy the FREEDOM to know this kind of works. If the people were at LIBERTY to know this work, they would trust the best and reject the rest. The wave of public opinion will have the force of law. This writer firmly believes that the people would not allow the Government to invest even Re.1/- arbitrarily in any place and all people all over India would stand by this writer.
Mrs. Pratiba Patel was elected as the first woman President of India on 21 July, 2007. She got 6,38,115 votes. Her rival, Mr.B.Shekhawat, polled 3,38,116 votes.
Mrs. Pratiba Patel said that her victory was a victory of the principles the people uphold. She added that she would work in an exemplary way to protect the Constitution of India.
Keeping this work in mind, some newspapers on the next day prayed to her not to tell the truth to the people. The paper invoked Dr.B.R.Ambedkar for this. The paper moaned that all kinds of things were expected and demanded from the President. The paper, however, accepted that the President has the right to be consulted, the right to encourage and the right to warn.
It must be noted that the three Members of the Election Commission (EC) of India did not appear in public sector TV channel since the email dated 14-6-2007.
It was submitted to the outgoing President of India that the present members of the EC of India enacted a coup against itself. A coup against the EC of India is nothing but a coup against the Constitution of India. The outgoing President is not giving any reason for it presumably because he failed to prevent it. The Supreme Court has not given any reply presumably because none approached it with a petition. The Members of the EC do not claim innocence because only imbeciles are innocent.
Evidently, the Election Commissioners must be prosecuted.
It is important because those who got the money –not less than Re.150000 crore during the last three years - are very close to the leaders who got disproportionate publicity through the public sector TV channel during the time of the UP State election.
One would say that Gandhiji, Nehru and many others followed the above two ways to remain in the mind of the people. But, is it good? Or is it right?
It took six years for this writer to come to a reasonable conclusion that one or two leaders gave public money to those close to them to preserve their position in India. It would take another six years to identify the men responsible for preventing the entry of this work into the mind of the people. As it is a serious matter, the new President could talk to the learned judges of the Supreme Court to prosecute the people/authorities responsible for this heinous crime.
Discontinuance of this work is a possibility due to an ailment. However, it is the duty of the incoming President of India to take this work to its logical conclusion. As the new keeper of law, it is her duty to deliver FREEDOM to her subjects on the first day of assuming power. Then, the people would come to know the different facets of this work from tomorrow onwards. Naturally, they would continue with this work.
Incidentally, it would prove that the outgoing President of India assassinated FREEDOM, talking crucial things indirectly.
The outgoing President of India in his farewell address to the Members of Parliament on 23 July, 2007 said that many civilizations in the past collapsed.
The facts from 15 June, 2007 to 24 July, 2007 are being sent on 24 July, 2007 through email in the hope that it would be the last email to the outgoing President of India and the first email to the new President of India.
V.SABARIMUTHU
83
A COUP
Mrs. Pratiba Patel assumed charge as the new President of India on 25 July, 2007 at 2.30 P.M.
After demitting office, the former President of India said that he functioned as a people’s President. He thanked all people who helped him by imparting knowledge.
On the next day, the Union Cabinet decided to put Re. 60,000 crore belonging to the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) in Mutual Funds like the Unit Trust of India (
In order to take the above decision, the Union Government had been waiting for the new President to take charge! Perhaps, the members of the Union Cabinet believed that the new President did not possess the critical energy badly needed to resist this decision.
Alternatively, the Union Cabinet wanted to show to the world that the entire Cabinet was responsible for giving the money to the manipulators.
On the same day, National University Educational Planning and Administration (NUEPA) revealed that out of the 1,30,0000 elementary schools in the country, 90000 did not have blackboards, 4, 64,000 schools did not have school buildings and 21,699 schools did not have even teachers. There were reports that 30 percent of the schools did not have separate toilets for girls.
Further, the amount spent for the victims of tsunami was less than Re.5000 crore.
Furthermore, the present Government privatized two major airports under the pretext of want money.
What all the Government of India could do with Re.60000 crore? The Government could spend the money for developing roads, railways and airports. It could use the money for extracting metals from the ores available in India. It could ask the PSUs to consume it. It could utilize the money for a national gas grid. It could make use of this money for furthering education and so on. Any of these steps would prevent unrest in several parts due to inadequate jobs, wages, food and shelter.
However, but for this work the entire surplus money of the PSUs –about Re.2,50,000 crore- would have gone into the
If the decision were a constitutional one, the Union Government could invest - as in the past- the entire surplus funds of the PSUs in the
Evidently, the decision is out and out unconstitutional. In fact, it is a human tragedy of outmost degree.
The members of the Union Cabinet have proved that they have different ways of making the people suffer. They have shown that they have unlimited powers over 1000 million people. These people remain in a lower condition. They have no political rights. Anyone could now see that the basis of slavery is economic. The members of the Union Cabinet were simply blinded by the money at their disposal.
A few members of the Union Cabinet might have thought of taking a contrary line. But they could have changed the traditional policy only by paying a price.
The reason why the members of the Union Cabinet do like this is not known to any one. Why do they reject this work also is not known. Surely, they simply refuse to look at this work through all angles to comprehend the problem as a whole. Apparently, they did not take this decision based on their free will. The email dated 24 July, 2007 might have catalyzed the decision. Alternatively, the present environment places some restrictions on their behaviour. However, this writer started this work only to help the nation and its leaders. The question of targeting any leaders did not occur in the mind at all.
The rare unanimity of the members of the Union Cabinet indicates that some Union Ministers also got money either as commissions or through the stock market directly or indirectly. The members of the Union Cabinet, the Supreme Court and the investigation agencies or anyone going through this work would never deny it. Now, one or two leaders would dance with the tribal people or sit with the handicapped. The people would forget all about Re.60000 crore given in one installment alone and the political benefits that go with it.
A Union Minister announced the above decision of the Union Cabinet. He, on 21 August, 2001, expanded the
Apparently, Her Excellency the President of India was startled by the decision. In fact, the Union Cabinet should not have humiliated her like this within 24 hours of assuming office. It was a plot because the media mafias had predicted that the new President would be controversial from day one.
On the next day, the Prime Minister of India met Her Excellency the President of India. Apparently, the Prime Minister of India did not consult the President before taking this crucial decision.
Two days later, the Left parties opposed the decision. This conveyed the impression that the new President told the Prime Minister that the Constitution of India did not permit the Government to arbitrarily put even Re. 1/- in any place. Otherwise, the Left parties would not have murmured.
On 28 July 2007, eight people were killed in police firing in Andra Pradesh State. The people were protesting against inadequate shelter.
On 30 July, 2007 the Chairman of the Highway Authority of India was substituted by another person. No reason was given for the substitution. It might be related to the email dated 24- 7-2007 to the President of India.
On 1 August 2007, a newspaper –THE HINDU- gave the following guidelines to the new President of India. 1. The President should “not yield to populist temptation”. 2. The President should “roll back the presidency to its institutional confines”. 3. The President should not even “try to replicate the style and mannerism of her predecessor”. 4. The President could function as the guardian of the Constitution of India “only if he or she has a genuinely honest and impartial profile”. 5. The constitutionality or otherwise of the decisions of the Union Government should be checked by the Supreme Court only and not at all by the President. 6. “A President cannot have policy views parallel to those of the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers”. 7. The President should ignore the coup enacted by the Election Commissioners in the light of the nature of their work. 8. The President must reject the demand of the “middle class” that the Government must be reined in by the Supreme Court and the investigation agencies. 9. The President should not instigate various institutions to move beyond their boundaries. 10. The President should not allow the law to take its own course because those who occupy political and public office find it difficult to function.
In this connection, it must be stated that the service tax and transaction tax were the suggestions given by this writer to manage a fiscal crisis in India. The Union Government accepted those suggestions. Now the Government has surplus funds. All banks have become profit making entities.
The first letter dated
The interest burden was crippling the people. Anyone going through this work could see that the NDA Government was requested to decrease the deposit rates and lending rates. The NDA Government looked at this grave problem with all its seriousness. Then the lending rates were brought down from around 16 per cent to around 8 per cent. This saved the borrowers all over India from a debt trap. It was the genesis of a great economic change. The former Prime Minister of India and his advisers must be commended for it although everything went unnoticed.
When the system failed to understand the meaning of the words constitutionalism, socialism, Preamble and equality, this writer clubbed the Re. 845 crore given by the Bank of India to the sale of a
As the Supreme Court was corroding the Constitution of India the then Chief Justice of India was pre-empted from hearing the HPCL/BPCL privatization case. Many other changes also occurred in the Supreme Court due to this work.
The people to people contact and bilateral trade with Pakistan Bangladesh, and countries in the East of the North-Eastern States improved mainly due to this work.
The Prime Minister of India went to the airport to receive the heads of some important countries that helped India in the past. This also could be traced to this work. Further, the bilateral relationships with many countries improved.
Due to this work, a Governor of the Reserve Bank of India lost his job. The portfolio of a Finance Minister was changed.
This work thwarted the chances of a representative of the manipulators to become the President of India during the 2002 presidential election.
The investigation agencies had been dragging the then Chief Minister of Bihar, into jail for Re. 44 lakh. This process of repeated arrests, jail and bail ceased only when this writer pointed out the giant manipulations going on in some other places.
Defying this work, the present Government privatized the Delhi and Mumbai airports. Some shares of the PSUs were sold apparently in bad faith. Some properties belonging to some PSUs were also sold. These were compared to some historical facts in Travancore Kingdom. When this Government decided to privatize the Chennai airport, some unpleasant parallels in the Travancore Kingdom was again pointed out to the Government. This stopped the privatization of Chennai airport. The Government might swell its power to its out most pitch again at an opportune time.
Resisting this work, extraction of iron in Orissa was given to a Korean Company. This was done to justify the acquisition of foreign companies by the Indian companies.
Challenging this work, the Government gave public money to a few individuals through stock market. A very careful analysis showed that the beneficiaries were close to one or two leaders. The analysis further proved that the media mafias “strange” the work of others only to perpetrate the rule of these leaders. This was pointed out to the former President of India. It was done to stop further flow of money, to recover the money already given and finally to enable him to give FREEDOM to Indians.
The present Speaker of Parliament did not encourage a discussion over this work. In fact, many Members of Parliament were afraid of reading this work inside the Parliament. Therefore, this work succeeded in undermining his chances to become the presidential candidates during the recent presidential election. The chances of two other potential candidates also diminished. The fact that the leaders did not opt for the known enemies of FREEDOM during the recent presidential election proved that good still exists in India.
One or two responsible people going through this work say that the history of this country for the last six years is nothing but the history of this writer for the last six years. Yet, the public sector TV channel refuses to show the face of this writer to the people. This proves that the donors and acceptors of money control the public sector TV channel. Thus the people are not at LIBERTY to know men and matters.
If a citizen of India could do such incredible things, the President of India could do more for the welfare of her subjects. But, the media mafias expect her to obey them like the poor woman at their gate!
Their most important commandment is that the new President must stand in the way of the law taking its own course. They did not apply this principle to the former Chief Minister of Bihar.
The Supreme Court had directed a former Chief Minister of the TN state to surrender the illegally acquired land.
The investigation agencies gave sufficient sufferings to the present Chief Minister of the UP State.
But, now the media mafias say that the superior men in the Supreme Court and the law enforcement wings should not rein in on one or two rulers who reap the benefits of the Re.44000 crore given to two boys.
They further demand that the coup enacted by the Election Commissioners must be ignored. This shows that the Election Commissioners enacted the coup at the instance of the acceptors of money.
A Union Minister on 31 July, 2007 said that democracy allowed objective scrutiny of the shortcomings of the Government by the people. In this connection, it must be stated that he must have asked the public sector TV channel to give the reason for concealing this work from the watchful eye of the people. So, for all practical purposes, he is committing a cognizable crime by denying FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY to Indians.
A newspaper 5 August, 2007 said that the General Secretary of the Communist Party of India (Marxists), committed a historic blunder over the selection of the UPA presidential and vice –presidential candidates. In this way The New Indian Express exposed its heartburn. The paper added that she should not have been selected for the top post as she was practically unknown outside the Maharastra State.
In this connection, it must be stated that the present President of India was not known outside her State not because she lacked any qualities of a political leader but because the media mafias did not project her as a national leader. The present Chief Minister of Kerala cannot aspire to become a national leader not because he is inferior to anyone but because he has no rapport with the manipulators. This writer cannot easily become a national leader because the media mafias would strange his work.
The same paper, through another article, attacked the new President virulently. It was an unwarranted attack. It was reminiscent of the attacks during the presidential election. This gave the impression that Her Excellency the President of India vetoed the 26 July, 2007 decision as an anti constitutional one. The Prime Minister might have told this to his promoters. Therefore, the media mafias retaliated like this to cripple her decision making power. If she had approved the decision of the Union Cabinet, they would not have attacked her at all. This is the inference of a man sitting away from the scene of action.
In this connection, it must be noted that the former President of India was afraid of the media mafias. Though he curtailed several manipulations, the manipulators succeeded in removing public money in one way or other. As he feared personal attacks, the people could not discover FREEDOM during his tenure. Therefore, ignoring all personal attacks, the new President must enable the people to discover FREEDOM.
In an interview to the media mafias on 4 August, 2007 the new President of India said that she would be a “political President”. She reiterated her stand taken during the presidential election that she would not be a rubber stamp. She added that she would discuss all critical matters with the Government. The Government, according to her, could accept or reject her views.
In this connection, it must be noted that the 26 July, 2007 decision of the Union Government was a coup against the Constitution of India. This money enables one or two leaders to demonstrate their power and position in India. The Government has no right to give even Re.1/- arbitrarily to anyone. As this money serves the purpose of denying FREEDOM to Indians, even the Parliament cannot amend the Constitution to give money like this.
Further, it is disturbing to note that the acceptors of this money steadfastly stand by one or two rulers thereby denying DEMOCRACY. Any bond formed by the transfer of public funds would be a very strong one. The work like this one would never break it unless Her Excellency the President of India allows the law to take its own course.
One would say that Gandhiji and Nehru remained as mass leaders following the above ways. But, all people of good education, sound morality and virtue would say that these ways are not good.
Now, anyone would tell that so long as this work remains secret, the evil secret of the system would remain concealed from the citizens. Therefore, this work must be left
The responsibility of the new President of India is two fold. One is stop giving public funds to any one through the stock market. The second one is enabling the people to discover FREEDOM.
The new President of India had informed the people the words of a sage. The sage might have envisaged only this responsibility.
However, the media mafias in collaboration with the Union Government would strange even the words of Her Excellency the President of India. Overcoming all hurdles, the new President must discharge her responsibility.
In view of the coup enacted by the Union Government, the facts from 25 July 2007 to 8 August 2007 are being sent through email to Her Excellency the President of India on 8 August, 2007 at 10. 30 P.M.
V.SABARIMUTHU
84
A PARADISE
The militant people killed 8 people in Assam on 9 August, 2007.
The same militant people killed 21 people including six children on 11 August 2007.
Again on 12 August, 2007 the militant people killed 4 people in Assam.
Quoting Swami Vivekananda, Her Excellency the President of India on 14 August, 2007 exhorted the people to work relentlessly till the goal is reached.
On the next day, the Prime Minister of India declared that eight Indian Institute of Technology, five Indian Institute of Science Education, seven Indian Institute of Management, 20 Indian Institute of Information Technology and 6000 high quality schools would be opened in the country. This was not presented in the budget for 2007-2008. Therefore, this must be read and interpreted in the light of the work of this writer.
A Parliamentary Committee recommended reservation for the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts. The Committee disclosed that there were only 21 judges belonging to the Scheduled Caste out of 600 High Court judges.
As Mr. Nehru gave great importance to the so-called merit, one would say that the above predicament is the repercussion of the policy pursued by him. Now, even the children would demand reservation for various states and caste groups.
In this connection, it must be stated that the Indian society is a heterogeneous one. As the Supreme Court does not reflect this heterogeneity, the actions of learned judges of the Supreme Court, at times, resemble the actions of a “crowd”. Guided by like interests they lose individual reasoning. They resist the rational suggestions of individuals and the society. The greater the gathering of the learned judges, the lesser is the sense of responsibility among them and the greater the chances of destruction of established order. This happened in the BALCO judgment when the learned judges placed economic policy of the Government above judicial scrutiny. Therefore, this writer on 2 March, 2002 requested the then Chief Justice of India not to follow the “crowd”. The importance of heterogeneity in the Supreme Court and in its Benches was emphasized on 10 December, 2002.
Now, the Chief Justice of India must establish order in the Supreme Court and High Courts. The tendency of the system, however, would be to ignore the above report.
Her Excellency the President of India on 22 August, 2007 paid a visit to the Supreme Court. A Tamil daily alone reported this in a remote corner of the paper. Even the public sector TV channel did not give any importance to this visit.
In this connection, it must be noted that the then President of India visited the Supreme Court for the first time in 2001 in the context of the first few letters of this writer. The former President of India visited the Supreme Court several times in response to other letters.
Now, Her Excellency the President of India met the learned judges of the Supreme Court. The President might have persuaded the learned judges to contribute their share to bring constitutionalism in India.
In the meantime, the Prime Minister of Japan, Mr. Shinzo Abe, came to India mainly to strengthen the bilateral relationship between India and Japan.
The biggest private sector company in India paid Re.15,130 crore as corporate tax during 2006-2007. Another company paid Re. 2372 crore and the third company paid Re. 1364 crore. Some newspapers reported this on 23 August, 2007.
Two blasts killed 40 people in the Andra Pradesh (AP) State on 24 August, 2007.
A chain snatcher was beaten up by a mob and dragged by a police man in his motor cycle in the Bihar State. A few days earlier, a similar incident occurred at Nagercoil in Tamil Nadu State.
A Union Minister said that over one lakh people were getting jobs in the work related to the National Highways. The object of Highways work is a multipurpose one. Any national work of this kind should have generated several big contractors in every district. Now, the people see no new contractors in their vicinity.
The present UPA Government, apparently, wanted to dissolve the Parliament to get the approval of the people for the Indo- US nuclear deal. The leader of the BJP was quick to support the Government for the deal provided the Government makes some changes in the Indian laws.
A Union Finance Minister said that the biggest goal of his life was to wipe out abject poverty. The Finance Minister effectively presents one facet of his policy through his sweet- talks. Thus, at a time when many stretches of many National Highways remain untouched due to dearth of funds, he allows the flow of public funds in the
The Prime Minister of India called on Her Excellency the President of India on 27 August, 2007.
The Union Government on 30 August, 2007 decided to grant pension to all people above 65 years provided they came below the poverty line.
On the same day, the Union Government decided to sell 4.75 percent shares of the NTPC, a public sector Company for Re.6000 crore and 10 percent shares of the Oil India Limited (
The Union Government has even directed the Post Offices to extract money to invest in shares. Now the postal employees persuade the depositors to invest in shares saying that such investments would yield 15 to 20 per cent interest. The public, instead of depositing their money in other saving schemes, opt for the shares. The money is not utilized for public investments but goes in the hands of a few manipulators. The manipulators, in turn, perpetrate this system. The people all over India are not realizing the nature of this human tragedy.
The media mafias focus the attention of the people to Indo- Pakistan conflict, Indo- US nuclear talks or in an activity not directly connected with this tragedy. In the past, while India was waging a war with the Tamil militants in Sri Lanka, the manipulators had been silently removing public money from the financial institutions through the stock market.
There are thousands of newspapers and hundreds of periodicals and TV channels. But they have combined together to exploit public funds in a ruthless way. As the public sector TV channel also collaborates with the media mafias, the communication media in India has become a centralized one. Thus, no TV channel or any newspaper in India is ready to allow the people to go through this work to see the truth.
The media mafias effectively indoctrinate that the financial institutions invest in shares to make profits. Through continuous brain washing they induce the people, Members of Parliament, Election Commissioners, and even the learned judges to accept this as a necessary component of governing a nation. A few who realize the danger, apparently, consider this as the condition in which they should die. They never question the constitutionality of this policy at all. Therefore the media mafias have decided to “strange” all people who oppose this policy. The purpose of concealing this work, obviously, is to prevent the people from taking a reasonable calculation of alternative.
The media mafias cannot achieve their goal without the help of some political leaders cut out for manipulations. The persons of narrow view become a prey to their designs. Such leaders have great faith in the strength of the media mafias. They depend upon the mass media for name because self interest dominates their narrow view. Naturally, the work like this one is a repugnant one to them.
The mass media must dispel the darkness. It must check the misuse of political power. Then India would be a paradise to live. But, the media mafias in India persuade the leaders to misuse their power. Naturally, the leaders who owe their political power to mass media inculcate a manipulative attitude.
Those who develop a manipulative attitude become the chosen leaders of the media mafias. The media mafias instill the people to believe that these leaders work selflessly for the well being of the people. They would show how these leaders love the neglected sections of the people. They would show that the awards they receive from the foreign countries are for their sound education, ability and honesty. They praise or criticize these leaders for the achievements of their own ends.
The more a political leader promotes manipulation, the more he tries to identify himself with the poor for acceptance. He always presents one side view of governing the nation.
The above method of governing a nation happened in Italy during the time of Mussolini. He used the mass media to re-establish the Great Roman Empire. The world understood what Mussolini did. But the world fails to understand that the same technique is being used with greater intensity in India to retain power and prestige.
Six years of work is not sufficient to identify the people responsible for this. However, the President of India could identify the hidden Mussolinies in India. Any leader who supports transfer of public funds into the hands of manipulators through the aid of stock market by concealing this work is a hidden Mussolini.
The President could disprove the above conclusion only by giving FREEDOM to the people. It is the duty of the President to go through the facts and conclusions and come to a reasonable agreement after due consultation with the Chief Justice of India, Union Government, political parties and other competent authorities. The President must consider this as the demand of the innocent children of India.
The facts from 9 August, 2007 to 31 August, 2007 are being sent to Her Excellency the President of India on 31 August, 2007 at 10 P.M. through email.
V.SABARIMUTHU
85
CONTROLING PUBLIC MIND
A Union Minister on 2 September, 2007 said that the public sector Life Insurance Corporation of India (
In this connection, it must be pointed out that the premium paid to the
Now, Her Excellency the President of India might have noticed that the tax exemption has been silently extended to private mutual funds and insurance companies. The justification, apparently, is that there must be a level playing field for the private sector companies.
In this connection, it must be pointed out that thousands of individuals engaged in banking business all over India accept deposits from the public. They are able to collect only a limited amount because these deposits do not enjoy tax exemptions. Therefore, the tax exemption granted to the deposits in private mutual funds and insurance companies of about ten citizens vitiates the fundamental right that ensures equality of opportunity.
The money extracted by the public sector financial institutions must go to industries all over India in an equitable way. Further, all deposits enjoying tax exemptions must go to public investments only. These are the demands of the Constitution of India. But, in practice, the money goes to a few industries only. Thus, while 99.9 per cent of the industries depend on loan for their survival, 0.1 per cent of the industries revel in releasing shares in definite quanta to financial institutions. There is no limit for the money thus collected. The tax exemption now granted to private companies aggravates this condition because the people would prefer to invest in private companies. This is against the fundamental rights and Article 16 of the Constitution of India.
The people have a fundamental right to lead a decent and honest life. As more than 50 percent of the savings of the people all over India go into the pockets of about ten citizens, public investments all over India are affected. This leads to economic deprivation. Many young men resort to chain snatching or join some militant groups. In other words, the flight of capital converts peace loving people into anti-social elements. The tax exemption granted for investments in the hands of a few citizens is worsening the situation.
Above all, anyone going through this work would tell that the money collected by getting tax exemption ruthlessly suppresses independent politics and free speech. In other words, this money controls the public mind in India. Therefore, the tax exemption granted to any deposits that ultimately go in the hands of the manipulators is like waging a relentless war against independent thought. It is an unkind blow against FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY present in the Constitution of India. Her Excellency the President of India, with all her legal background, would understand it better.
The media mafias induce the people to believe that theft is common with the man in the street only and not with the top political leaders. Therefore, within a day the peace loving people are aroused to kill chain snatchers and thieves. The crowds are even incited to kill innocent people on mere suspicion.
One reason for this predicament is the Supreme Court. At one time it says that it could scrutinize all laws passed by the Parliament including the laws inserted into the ninth schedule. At another time, it says that the economic policy approved by the Parliament is above judicial review. This contradiction enables the Prime Minister to convert all organs of the Government into a vassal of about ten citizens.
The people believe that the leaders of the Congress Party serve the nation selflessly. They believe that the Congress leaders do not appropriate public fund to preserve their position in the society. In order to live up to the expectations of the people, the Congress leaders in the Union Cabinet could have vetoed the removal of public funds through the aid of the
The other parties supporting the system could have also vetoed the removal of public money. In fact, when the present Minister for Railways and former Chief Minister of Bihar State was arrested again and again for about Re. 44 lakh, the media mafias gave wide publicity to it. The people thought that the publicity was to divert the attention of the people. They believed that he, in his capacity as a Union Minister and leader of a political party with a great mass base, would wreck vengeance upon the manipulators. But he, for all practical purposes, gave Re. 44000 crore to two boys silently. He is now not ready to even talk about the money daily going into the stock market from the financial institutions and the Postal Department.
If the Minister for Railways had vetoed the manipulations, the mass media would not have given good rating for his performance as Railway Minister. The universities and institutes would not have invited him for talks. The public sector TV channel would not have given any importance to him. The manipulators would not have set him free from the court cases. Many important leaders would not have talked to him.
Now, his presence in the Union Cabinet reinforces the forces of manipulations because the people believe that he is a man of social justice, freedom and democracy. They would never think that he was also responsible for giving Re.44000 crore to two boys.
The Left parties lending support to the Government from outside could have also vetoed the manipulations. The workers all over India, in fact, repose confidence in their sincerity.
But the manipulators, apparently, gave an assurance to the Government to take care of the top leaders of the Left parties. Thus the Left parties did not place any demand to take back the illegally privatized PSUs. They did not murmur when the Post Offices all over India started extracting money for the manipulators. They did not shout slogans when Re.44000 crore was given to two boys. They did not take out processions when tax exemptions were granted to the deposits in the hands of about ten citizens. They did not threaten to withdraw support to the Government for the denial of FREEDOM to 1000 million people. No wonder, they are able to appear or disappear from the public sector TV channel at any time.
The officials of the intelligence agencies and the members of The National Human Rights Commission do not want to burn their fingers presumably because the media mafias could easily strange their actions.
Now, anyone going through this work would tell that the leaders of coalition parties, the leaders of the Left parties, investigation agencies, The National Human Rights Commission, Supreme Court and the mass media reinforce the Government both to perpetrate the unconstitutional manipulations and to deny FREEDOM. It is called fascism.
Fascism was originally seen in Italy between 1922 and 1943. In Italy, there was strict obedience to a leader for his capacity to rule Italy. The mass media helped him partly for his nationalistic views and partly to plunder. In India also there is strict obedience to one or two leaders for their capacity to rule India. The mass media is plundering public money by helping these leaders to win the heart of the people.
The Chief Justice of India on 8 September, 2007 said that laws must fulfill the needs of the people.
The public sector Power Grid Corporation of India Limited (PGCIL) is giving an advertisement to sell 10 percent of its shares. It is an unconstitutional arbitrage trading because the Union Government gave Re. 60,000 crore to the
In this connection, it must be noted that the PGCIL wanted to sell 10 per cent of its shares in April 2007.The newspapers reported this on 5 February, 2007. The PGCIL could not sell the shares then presumably because the former President of India, based on this work, discouraged arbitrage trading. It is the duty of Her Excellency the President of India to veto arbitrage trading now and for good.
The Hindu on 12 September, 2007 said that the public sector State Bank of India would give about $1 billion as loan to a private company to support “Corus” acquisition. The interest rate and the nature of security offered were not disclosed. After the removal of money to foreign countries the Indian rupee might weaken. The other industries and expatriate workers hit by the hardening of the currency would then heave a sigh of relief.
On 13 September, 2007 a crowd of about 300 villagers in Bihar captured 10 thieves and killed them by beating.
All right thinking people going through six years of this work would now tell that Fascism has become the political heritage of India. It is the responsibility of the President to rescue India from Fascism as it is fast becoming the social heritage of India. In order to accomplish it, Her Excellency the President of India must have full faith in her capability.
The facts from 1 September, 2007 to 17 September, 2007 are being sent to Her Excellency the President of India on 17 September, 2007 at 10.50 P.M.
V.SABARIMUTHU
86
SOCIAL HERITAGE
The police in Bihar State threw the dead bodies of 10 suspected thieves in a sacred river saying that the Government did not give money for their cremation. The police said that the so- called thieves were nomads.
The villagers killed one more person by beating in Bihar, on 18 September, 2007 presumably because he thieved an idol from a worshipping place.
A Union Minister said that the Government was committed to a free media. He added that his Government would not interfere in the functioning of the public sector TV channel.
Speaking at the 53rd Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference (
The Speaker of Indian Parliament said that democracy was a way of life in India.
The Union Government, on 25 September 2007 decided to borrow Re.59,000 crore from the public.
In this connection, it must be noted that the Government gave Re.60,000 crore to the
The Union Government further decided to permit a Non Resident Indian (
In Myanmar, about 10,000 monks, on 25 September, 2007 marched through the streets of Yangon demanding democracy. Two monks and a civilian were killed. The USA, UK, France, Japan besides the UN Security Council, European Union and many other countries called for restraint in reacting to protests. India urged the Government of Myanmar to resolve the issue peacefully.
In this connection, it must be stated that those who possess power in Myanmar are military generals. The world knows this. In fact, the world knows what is going on in Myanmar. Thus, the world knows that the pro democracy leader of Myanmar, Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi, is under house arrest with adequate protection. But in India, those who possess power have decided to “strange” the works of the people. As a result, the world does not know what is going on in India. Thus, the Government of India has placed this common man virtually under house arrest without any protection. In fact, the Union Government has placed 1000 million people in a dark chamber just to facilitate plunder.
The technique followed to deny FREEDOM to Indians, however, is more heinous than in Myanmar. The fact that about 10,000 monks could gather in a place indicates the nature of democracy in Myanmar. In contrast, even ten people will not gather today in a place demanding democracy in India. In other words, the decision to strange this work is a total one in India.
Further, those who deny democracy to the people of Myanmar are getting a bad name. But, all those who deny FREEDOM to Indians are honoured everywhere.
The only way to disprove the above conclusions is giving FREEDOM to the people to know the other side view of governing India. But, the Union Government and the mass media would continue to deny FREEDOM till a stronger force acts on it.
A Union Minister, on 26 September, 2007 said that the rapid rise in rupee value was market determined and the Government would not interfere in it. Instead, he added that the Government would intervene to provide succour to exporters. The Union Minister for Commerce also said that the Government would not intervene in checking rupee hike.
The Union Government could determine the exchange rate of rupee. In fact, it is the duty of the Union Government to do so. Now, the people believe that the Union Government indirectly gave Re. 200,000 crore during the past one year to a few individuals to buy assets abroad by allowing the Indian rupee to appreciate.
In this connection, it must be noted that a present Union Minister had said that the Government of India would render all possible helps to Indian companies to acquire foreign companies.
Now, it is the duty of Her Excellency the President of India to reveal the truth in the above matter. The Government might have done it in good faith is a different matter.
The Prime Minister of India, on 26 September, 2007 released the autobiography of an actor.
A person in Chennai committed suicide because hired men of some private banks including the biggest private bank in India humiliated him for his inability to clear one installment of loan.
The villagers in Bihar on 28 September, 2007 killed a suspected thief. The police, however, said that he was an innocent worker. Altogether 17 suspected thieves have been killed without any trial within a span of one month by the people of different villages in Bihar alone.
In this connection, it must be stated that no political leader in India is directly responsible for this cannibalism. However, the leaders from Bihar could have prevented it by discharging their onerous duty in the Union Cabinet. They could have rejected all unconstitutional manipulations. They, along with other like minded leaders, could have placed a demand to restrain the public sector financial institutions from investing public money in shares. Then the people would have discussed the pros and cons of their stand and a socio economic change would have ensued. Alternatively, they could have given FREEDOM to the people to go through this work. Then the people would have identified the factors that convert the peace loving people into murderers and thieves.
Those who received huge commissions might join the club of the manipulators and deny FREEDOM while professing democracy, rule of law and human rights. Those who removed public funds in the name of selling shares also might be against the LIBERTY present in the Constitution of India. But the people fail to understand the reason why the Union Ministers from Bihar deny FREEDOM to the people and facilitate manipulations
The Supreme Court on 28 September, 2007 stayed a Government Order that provided reservation for Muslims in Andra Pradesh State.
In this connection, it must be pointed out that the Supreme Courts has been wasting its precious time by hearing similar cases for the last 60 years. Therefore, it must give an answer to the crucial question whether the mark sheet or the so called mark of a candidate in an examination is the sole index of his intelligence or not. The question of State wise or caste wise or religion wise reservation could be then easily determined.
The Communist Party of India (Marxist), on 29 September, 2007 declared that there would be no compromise on the proposed Indo-US nuclear deal. However, the USA said that India could take its own time to sign the agreement. Now there is no justification for dissolving the Parliament under this pretext.
In this connection, it must be noted that the media mafias in India are giving disproportionate publicity to a few leaders. A careful analysis would show that these leaders either gave public fund to those close to them through the stock market or plundered public money through the stock market. None would deny this.
The UPA chairperson would address the UN General Assembly on 2 October, 2007 in connection with the birth anniversary of Gandhiji. The public sector TV channel reported this on 30 September, 2007.
An Indian private company would come out with a public issue to extract about Re.12,000 crore from the public. The media mafias reported this on 30 September, 2007.
In this connection, it must be stated that anyone could buy the shares of the private Company. At the same time, it is the duty of Her Excellency the President of India to restrain the Government from the buying the shares of this company and other private companies using the public funds in the public sector financial institutions.
If the money were given, the mass media, as an act of reciprocation, would support those who possess power in India today. In other words, this money would perpetrate the rule of one or two leaders in India. Therefore, it is out and out unconstitutional to buy the shares of this company or any other company using public funds.
If the BJP had given money like this, it could have ruled India for generations. In fact, any imbecile could rule India or even become a world leader using this technique.
Apparently, Her Excellency the President of India is facilitating manipulations of the highest order. Further, the present President also is either helpless or incapable of giving FREEDOM to Indians. The fact that the people are not aware of this work proves this. As the social life of the President of India is basically dependent upon the social heritage handed down from the Father of the Nation to people, mass media to people, Supreme Court to other courts, Prime Minister to Prime Minister and President to President, it appears that the present President has accepted Fascism as the social heritage of India.
It is said that the laws of nature demand that man must adapt himself biologically to the environment in which he lives or perish. Thus it is said that fish is not fitted to live without water and hence it must die outside water. Similarly, the Indian leaders tainted by Fascism are not fitted to survive without the help from the mass media and hence they must die in an atmosphere of FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY. Thus, these leaders would never survive in Indian politics the moment this work comes out. This is the reason why those who possess power in India talk of FREEDOM while denying FREEDOM.
One would tolerate if the Fascism tainted leaders were contented with ruling India. But they are facilitating unconstitutional manipulations daily to the detriment of 1000 million people.
However, even now the President could give FREEDOM to the people of India. The first step is allowing the people to go through this work.
The facts from 18 September, 2007 to 30 September 2007 are being sent to Her Excellency the President of India on 1 October, 2007 at 11.45 A.M through email in the profound hope that the President would rescue India from Fascism.
V.SABARIMUTHU
87
NEO FASCISM
The UPA Chairperson addressed the UN General Assembly on 2 October 2007- the birth day of Mahatma Gandhi - in connection with the International Day of Non-violence.
On 2 October, 2007 a Union Minister declared a new insurance scheme to the people below the poverty line. According to this scheme, when a bread winner in a family dies in an accident, his family would get Re.75000. The Union Government would pay 50 per cent of the premium. Initially, the Union Government would give a premium of Re.1000 crore per year to the Life Insurance Corporation of India (
In this connection, it must be stated that any Government, acting in good faith, would give this amount directly to the families of the victims. As per the present scheme not even Re.100 crore would reach the affected people in the next few years. Further, the money would go into the hands of the manipulators through the
The Nobel Foundation on 2 October, 2007 regretted for not honouring Mahatma Gandhi. Everyman has a good side and a bad side. For a good man, his good side outweighs his bad side. An allegation during the time of Gandhiji was that the Indian National Congress Party wanted to strange the words of many leaders and that led to the partition of India. Further, when reservation was introduced to the people of backward communities, the Congress party resorted to fasting saying that the British were dividing Indians on caste lines. The effect of the fasting is that not even one candidate from the backward communities in India has entered the Indian Institute of Technology (
A newspaper on 4 October, 2007 disclosed that 100 names involved in removing public money from the financial institutions had been forwarded to the intelligence agencies. The paper did not mention the name of the authority that forwarded the names.
The newspapers on 4 October, 2007 put the assets of the mutual funds in India at Re. 4, 77,737.61 crore. On 9 October, 2007 the Mumbai stock market sensitive index crossed 18000 points. Some newspapers on the next day commended this as the “vote for Indian economy and politics”.
In this connection, it must be recalled that large industries in Italy were skeptical of Mussolini. However, as he possessed some “personal magnetism”, the key industrialists - through some middle men - wanted to strike a mutually advantageous bargain with him.
In India, the large industries were skeptical of the Congress party. Therefore, they wanted to grab all Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs), the public money in the financial institutions and the foreign exchange with the help of the then ruling Bharatia Janatha Party (BJP). But the action taken by the BJP for the letter dated 1-6- 2001 perplexed them. They succeeded in removing a few PSUs only. Further, the BJP, apparently due to this work, did not allow them to remove public money in the financial institutions in the scale they wanted. Therefore, they wanted to strike a mutually advantageous bargain with one or two leaders of the Congress party. Apparently, those who acted as go-between still remain as Union Ministers in the Cabinet rank
In Italy, the key industries reached a satisfactory understanding with Mussolini. Accordingly, in 1925 an agreement was signed to regularize the relations between Fascism and Italian Industry. Essentially, it gave organized Italian Industry the privileged position of a state within a state in return for its implied promise to support the Fascist regime. The Federation of Italian Industry which had negotiated with Mussolini received semi official status as a self governing body for the regulation of the economy.
In India also the key manipulators reached a latently satisfactory understanding with one or two important leaders of the Congress party. No written agreement was signed. But the understanding gave organized Indian Industry the privileged position of a state within a state in return for its implied promise to extend mass media support to a Government led by the Congress party. They deserted the BJP, enforced a general election and supported the Congress party. The key businessmen began to act as a self governing body for the regulation of the Indian economy.
Accordingly, the
All the above directions were unconstitutional. Yet, their latent orders were carried out with outmost sincerity. At the same time, the mass media focused the attention of the people to other matters. The President of India and the Supreme Court remained as if they were unaware of the above. Naturally, when they wanted to buy assets abroad, the money value increased. The money value would decrease, the moment they decide to bring in money.
On the other side, the financial institutions recovered the housing loan, educational loan, jewel loan and other loans given to the people with penal interest.
Further, the main reason for the personal magnetism of Mussolini was that he attacked the clergymen virulently.
In India some leaders depict some political parties as communal in the belief that it would add to their reputation.
Fascism in Italy was a product of post war conditions.
Fascism in India is a product of post independence conditions.
In Italy, Fascism seemed bewildering because it had no clear ideology. It spoke of the language of socialism. But it adopted an economic policy which buttressed the forces of large capital.
In India also all political parties talk of socialism. But the economic policy permitted removal of public money either as commission or through stock market.
The people wondered whether Fascism in Italy was Right or Left. It was settled by putting the fascist alongside ultra conservatives.
In India also none knows whether the Congress Party is Left or Right. But its leaders relish in appearing in the attire of the freedom fighters and common people. The misunderstandings are being dispelled by putting the Congress men along with other leaders known for social justice, freedom, and democracy. Even some judges from the neglected sections of the people are put before disloyal judges.
In Italy, Mussolini denied the right to strike work.
In India, at least one State Government banned strike by employees and the Supreme Court upheld it.
In Italy, the Fascist Party stressed its evolutionary origin. At the same time it reassured the propertied and the tradition minded.
In India, the Congress party always stresses the freedom struggle. At the same time it reassures the manipulators.
The fascist system in Italy bore a considerable family resemblance. In fact, the system taught fanatical loyalty to the regime. Mussolini took with him even his son-in-law in the hope of making him his successor. He described all those who opposed his policies as enemies of nation.
In India, all those who possess power depict the people opposing the unconstitutional manipulations as enemies of the nation and expect all others to strange them. The mass media is teaching a fanatical loyalty to one or two leaders.
Fascism in Italy was described as “radicalism of the Right”.
Fascism in India also could be described as radicalism of the Right.
The system under Mussolini was called Italian Corporation. It was described as an engine of class rule.
The present system in India is called United Progressive Alliance (UPA). It is an engine of class rule.
Mussolini did everything in the name of “reform”.
In India, all manipulators coined the word “reform” for all manipulations.
Mussolini dissolved the political parties.
In India, the political parties have a nominal existence. But they have no power to discuss or formulate economic policies. Thus all the above mentioned decisions taken by the UPA Government were not discussed in the Parliament. The political parties and the people were not taken into confidence.
In Italy, fascism denied the people the right to choose their own leader.
In India, the neo fascism denies the people the right to choose their own leader because the system effectively conceals the works like this one.
In 1930 Italian Corporation seemed for ever established. Its authority was virtually unquestioned at home and abroad.
It seems that neo-Fascism has been established in India. It remains largely unquestioned in India and abroad.
The above comparison is based on six years of systematic analysis of Indian politics. This work was not started with a bias against any political leader in India. Therefore, even children would agree with the inference.
Now, anyone could see that one or two political leaders use mass media to retain power and prestige in India. The mass media is now even publishing in bold letters their words that are likely to stimulate hatred. It happened in Italy and the world believed that it would not happen again. But, it is happening in India with greater intensity.
Democracy is not for substituting one leader with another leader alone. It is to substitute a policy with a better policy to ensure a better future to the people. Therefore, the President should not allow her Government to escape with presenting one side view of any policy. In other words, the President must see that her subjects get news and views. Then only, the people will enjoy the right to leadership of their own choice.
The facts from 1 October, 2007 to 10 October, 2007 are being sent to Her Excellency the President of India on 10 October, 2007 at 8 P.M. through email.
V.SABARIMUTHU
88
JUSTICE
A blast killed seven people in a cinema hall in the Punjab State.
Two people were killed when a crude bomb went off in the Mosque at Ajmer, Punjab State on 11October, 2007.
The newspapers on 16 October, 2007 said that the plan of a private company to remove Re.12,000 crore from the financial institutions through a public issue was in trouble.
This gives the impression that the President of India, thanks to the email dated 1-10- 2007, acted swiftly to stop inflicting another pubic wrong. This might go down as one of the greatest achievements of this work.
As a result of this work.-it may be recalled- the Union Cabinet on 12 September, 2006 asked the banks not to buy the shares of oil companies including the public sector oil companies. As the new President also has intervened within a span of one year, the banks might refrain from buying the shares or advancing money to buy the shares of any company in future. This is a political remedy of the President. It shows the concern of the President to give to the people “the best good in existing circumstances”. One would think that the days of sorrow are over. If it were true, it is like obtaining an Emerald from the President of India.
However, the people also must know this work so that they would prevent its recurrence.
The Prime Minister of India on 19 October, 2007 launched a new old age pension scheme to below poverty line people over 65 years. He said that no one should be left out. The nomenclature of the scheme was Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme. One crore people, including the present beneficiaries, all over India would be benefited. The decision is consistent with the work of this writer. It must be noted that this was not present in the Budget for 2007-2008.
In this connection, it must be stated that the Union Cabinet had earlier decided to give old age pension to all above 65 years. Now the scheme has been diluted to one crore people. It is a half hearted decision. As it is the most effective way to eradicate poverty, the Union Government could have allotted at least Re. 25000 crore per year to this scheme. Then about five crore people would have been benefited. A separate Ministry also could have been formed for effective implementation. It is not morally good to name the scheme after the leaders, who did not even dream of it during their life time. It could have been named after the leader who implemented this scheme for the first time in India.
The Union Government on 22 October, 2007 decided to give subsidy to the exporters affected by the appreciation of Indian rupee. The Government, in bad faith, wanted to help some private individuals to buy assets abroad by causing the Indian currency to appreciate. Now the exporters are affected. This would pave the way for several manipulations.
On 27 October 2007, some extremist people killed18 people including the son of former Chief Minister in the Jharkhand State. The newspapers in India did not report this matter in their front pages on the next day. Instead many newspapers reported the killing of 13 people in Pakistan on the same date in their front pages.
On 28 October, 2007 four people were killed in incidents related to the location of a chemical Special Economic Zone (SEZ) at Nandigram in West Bengal State.
The Governor of West Bengal State all on a sudden said that a war like situation was prevailing at Nandigram. The Governor disclosed it only after the realization that the police could no longer control the situation. Immediately, the Union Government sent the Central Reserve Force to Nandigram. Earlier in March 2007 the Chief Minister of West Bengal State said that there was lawlessness in Nadigram. A Union Minister also had said that a civil war was going on in Nandigram. But, none in India realized the seriousness of the situation.
Now the media mafia sparingly started reporting one or two things about Nandigram. They disclosed that the problem started in 3 January, 2007. Since then virtually a war has been going on between the opponents and proponents of the SEZ. According to the media mafias 27 people were killed. Thousands of people were rendered homeless forcing them to live in refugee camps. Only four women were raped. There were several bunkers and hideouts in that area. The police one day said that they found five half burnt bodies in a place. On the next day they described the dead bodies as skeletons.
Thus, the Prime Minister of India, after killing hundreds of his own people and sending thousands of them into refugee camps besides concealing everything from 1000 million people for over ten months requested the Government of West Bengal, on 20 November, 2007 to live and allow the people to live. At the same time, referring to the plight of the Malaysian Tamils, the Prime Minister of India asserted that his Government cared for the people of Indian origin everywhere. He said this while keeping the skeletons of the people of India in his hands! Thus, slavery, desolation, barbarism and cannibalism in India are to be called peace!
It must be stated that the need of the hour is that all those who concealed this for 10 months from the people must be tried for treason.
In this connection, it must be stated that no Member of Parliament could consider himself as a person elected by the people so long as such things remain concealed from the people. When such grave developments remain concealed, it is not a wonder that this work too remains concealed. This confirms the absence of FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY in India.
Though it is a digression, it is pertinent to recall that the women of certain castes in the Kingdom of Travancore were prohibited -in the year1814- from wearing high caste costume. This became an inflammable material connected with religion and caste in the year 1858. Some women were attacked and it was retaliated. Some worshipping places were torched. Some schools were destroyed by fire.27 houses were burnt down. Riot broke out in a market place. The troops were moved. Police was strengthened in different places. Some officials who appeared to have acted improperly were suspended. Some of the leaders of both parties were apprehended. Other measures were also taken with a view to preserve order. All restrictions on the mode of dressing were abolished through a Royal Proclamation. In the detailed report submitted to the British Government, the Devan – The Chief Secretary/ Prime Minister- of Travancore said, “No loss of life or limb has occurred anywhere.” Everyone must compare this with the condition prevailing in India now.
Coming back, the German Chancellor, Ms. Angela Merkel, came to India on 30 October, 2007.
On 6 November, 2007 the Union Government scrapped the Re.17,000 crore helicopter deal with European Aviation Consortium. Thus a
The President of India on 25 November, 2007 said that there must be rule of law in a democratic country. The President said that there must be absence of arbitrary power to ensure equality before law. The President added that the country must protect individual liberties.
As a reply to the above statement, the Chief Justice of India said that a good judicial system alone would not protect citizens against abuses of state power. He said that adequate laws and institutional mechanism also were needed. He added that only administration based on good governance could maintain rule of law in India. Further, the Chief Justice said that corruption in the Supreme Court would be checked. He promised that the public wrongs committed by the judiciary would be rectified. In this connection, he said that an orientation programme had been started to impart to the judges the knowledge of the good. He said this through a live telecast to the nation.
The decision to conduct orientation courses to judges is consistent with this work.
Further, the Chief Justice of India must note that the mind of the Supreme Court is 100 percent corrupt because it is not giving FREEDOM to the people to know this work. The Chief Justice of India must have declared INDEPENDENCE to the people before appearing before them in the TV. The Supreme Court knew that the entire system obeys either the manipulators or this writer. The Supreme Court also knew that the manipulators have an edge over this writer. But the people are not at liberty to see them. Therefore, the Chief Justice should have asked the public sector TV channel to telecast this work before telecasting his own speech.
When a letter was dropped to the then Chief Justice of India in 2001, it was not accepted as a writ petition. But consistent with the letter a public sector bank refused to give Re.2000 crore sought by the Unit Trust of India. Apparently, the then Chief Justice of India asked the then Prime Minister of India not to do anything unconstitutionally. The then Prime Minister of India obeyed it. Thus he obeyed REASON. Now, the Chief justice of India or the President of India could ask the Prime Minister of India the reason for not implementing any reasonable thing present in this work. The system would obey them without any hesitation. In fact, when the Prime Minister of India is not a man of reason or become an effete man, the system tends to obey any man of REASON.
The demand that the people must have the FREEDOM to know this work is a reasonable one. When the system denies this basic LIBERTY, the Chief Justice of India could ask the TV channels and newspapers not to publish his words. When they resist this and publish his words the people tend to believe nothing is concealed from their discerning eyes.
Now, it must be reiterated that the coverage a political leader gets in the mass media is a function of his manipulation value. The number of camera men before him also depends on this. The logical extension of this conclusion, apparently, is that the present President of India is not getting as much coverage as her predecessor because manipulation value of the new President is relatively less. Similarly, several Cabinet Ministers are not shown in the TV because their popularity would inhibit the growth of manipulators. Therefore, it is the duty of the Chief Justice India, President of India, Cabinet Ministers, political leaders and all others to ask the mass media not to publish anything about them or about their work before taking this work to the consciousness of the people of India.
The Supreme Court might say that this work seeks to mar the image of the judges. In order to assuage this feeling the first ten letters and associated facts have been again sent. These chapters do not contain the name of any living person in India.
The Chief Justice of India would also say that this work criticizes the judiciary and therefore it must be concealed. But, “men will not long respect laws which they may not criticize”.
The learned judges of the Supreme Court could discern that now India is making rational men into brute beasts. They could also discern that the Government and the Supreme Court require that their affairs should be conducted in secret. But, according to SPINOZA “the more such arguments disguise themselves under the mask of public welfare, the more oppressive is the slavery to which they will lead”. So the evil secrets of the system shall not be concealed from the people. In fact, had this work been taken to the knowledge of the people, the ballot box might have made this writer the Prime Minister of India. In other words, many in the system are getting publicity at the expense of this writer.
In the Assam State, the tribal students on 24 November, 2007 took out a procession demanding scheduled tribe status for them. In the clashes that ensued with the local residents, seven people were killed and several injured. Two more people were killed on 26 November, 2007. Thus, the cannibalism continues in many places just for employment in Government.
The reason for the above cannibalism is the Supreme Court (SC). Recently, a five judge Bench of the Supreme Court had been hearing a case on reservation. Now there is no news about this case. This gives the impression that the hearing of the case was deferred thanks to the email dated
The Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) on 23 November, 2007 suspended Pakistan from the 53-nation club. India endorsed it.
It must be noted that Pakistan is under a Military General. Yet the people all over the world could see the day to day developments in Pakistan. But, the system in India is successfully concealing this work. It is concealing several agitations. Surely, Pakistan is more democratic than India.
The Union Finance Minister said that the Government could not go ahead with reforms. He added that the Government wanted to do more in the remaining 16 months.
On the next day, Gas Authority of India Ltd and (GAIL) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with a private company to set up petrochemical complexes outside India. Both the companies further signed a MoU for natural gas pipeline, city gas distribution and many other joint ventures.
The Government might have found it good for the nation. But this work would show that the MoU is unconstitutional in nature. The experience shows that any joint venture between a public sector company and private company would be to the advantage of private party only.
Further, two or three boys from Mumbai shall not seek to exercise their power over the boys of Kerala State. In other words, the boys from Kerala must get a level playing field for their development. Now the Union Government is not giving money to the boys of Kerala. This undermines the UNITY present in the Constitution of India.
Furthermore, if the phone number of an innocent person were found in the diary of a thief or a small economic offender, the police call the former for interrogation.
The Union Cabinet on 4 July, 2001 issued a guideline in public interest. This guideline could be repealed only in bad faith. Therefore, the guideline even now binds the Government. According to this guideline, the Government should not have any truck with any charge-sheeted company or its sister companies directly or indirectly. The above private company had been charge-sheeted for a grave offence. There is no reason to believe that the case was a fabricated one. Therefore, the decision for joint venture is not only an immoral one but also an unconstitutional one. The MoU must be cancelled forthwith.
The High Court, Haryyana State had directed a Public Sector Undertaking (
However, a two judge Bench of the SC on 5 July, 2006 wanted the Government to act like a model employer. They said this with reference to the strike period of doctors. On 17 July, 2006 that Bench directed the Government to give salary for the strike period. Thus, this law contradicts another law enunciated by the Supreme Court.
One day - in the BALCO case - a three judge Bench of the Supreme Court said that the economic policy of the Government was beyond its scrutiny. It was an unconstitutional law given by the Supreme Court to the people of India. The Supreme Court seeks to enforce it even now. The divine doctrine that the reservation shall not exceed 49 % was another law given by the Supreme Court. It is trying to enforce this law also upon the people of India. The concept of “creamy layer” was another law given by the Supreme Court to the people. Thus, whenever it suited the learned judges they were loud in their new found doctrines.
Her Excellency the President of India must know the repercussions of the new law enacted by the above Bench. For instance, now the public sector banks are placing two or three girls in their branches as clerks. They work for two or three months. Some are not re-employed. Some are re-employed. The re-employed girls are either very close to someone in the bank or they are expected to do the works equivalent to the works of all others in the branch put together.
Apparently, they have no appointment order. No State level, District level or caste wise reservation. They have no leave rules. No Provident Fund. No monthly salary. No pay scale. Apparently they are graduate or postgraduates. When the sweeper in the bank looks on the floor, they remove the bits of paper from the floor. The peon occasionally looks down on them and asks them to keep their seats clean. But, the work in banks goes on smoothly. None knows where the profits of the banks go. This is the repercussion of the abolition of the Banking Service Recruitment Board. The law enacted by the Supreme Court on 10 December, 2007 would make this condition inevitable for these girls. But it is a crime against women and humanity. The Government is aware of it. But the President must regard this as crime committed against her own sex and put an end to it.
Similarly, private parties use the Insurance Institute of India to infiltrate the public sector Life Insurance Corporation of India (
What is the reason for the 10 December, 2007 judgment? The reason is that the Chief Justice of India said that he would put right the error committed by the Supreme Court. These two judges could not digest it. This created division in the Supreme Court.
Naturally, disgusted by the above law, another two judge Bench abandoned a case on the next day. Then a three judge Bench on 13 December, 2007 by instinct said that they were not bound by the order of the Supreme Court dated 10 -12-2007. Now, the observation of a three judge Bench stands because it is a REASONABLE one. The media mafias said that the Supreme Court might come out with a new guideline. The victim did not get relief is another matter.
However, it must be noted that the Benches are part of the Supreme Court only and they cannot represent the whole. Therefore, the Supreme Court must disclose its mind on all contradictory judgements and its wicked doctrines. It must disclose its mind on all unconstitutional judgements.
In this connection, it is said that not only all learned judges but also all others including the President, Prime Minister and Members of Parliament may prefer public right to private advantage. This is the task of the law giver. For this, the learned judges must be reasonable. In fact, it is said that if all men were reasonable, law would be superfluous. The learned judges must introspect whether they are reasonable or not. Then it would pave the way for a peaceful social and economic change. No guideline would be necessary to control the judges.
In the meantime, the High Court, Delhi observed that the investigation agencies were acting like men without ears and eyes. It directed the agencies to file the charge-sheet against some Members of Parliament.
The Managing Director of Gas Authority of India Limited (GAIL) on 11 December 2007 disclosed that the GAIL- Reliance venture for overseas plants was progressing well.
The Union Government on Wednesday extended the tenure of the Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation (
The Union Government on 13 December 2007 appointed the
Ironically, the person who described the
The above decision of the Union Cabinet shows that the nation is still susceptible for frequent attacks by formidable gangs of robbers. This also indicates that the leaders are leaning on public funds for their political survival. It is unconstitutional.
The money extracted by the Post Offices and other public sector financial institutions from Assam State shall not be siphoned off to any other place to enable two or three boys to buy the entire world. But it must be utilized for the development of the boys of Assam State. In other words, it must be used for public investment in Assam State. This is a reasonable suggestion.
Further, the flight of capital is affecting the salaries of employees. Due to inadequate pay, judges and magistrate wait for the cars of advocates. Doctors are being forced to use discarded cars.
Furthermore, it is affecting the unity of India. The Union Government shall not do anything to undermine the UNITY present in the Constitution of India. The Union Government shall not cut the throat of Indians. The decision must be annulled forthwith.
It must be noted that private parties are extracting money from the public in so many ways. The investment in the
It must be proudly submitted that, unlike in the Utter Pradesh Assembly election, the Election Commission did not enact any coup against itself in the recently concluded Gujarat Assembly election. The public sector TV channel was not blindly biased in favour of any political leader. Thus the Election Commission obeyed this writer. It would have obeyed anyone. But the nature wanted this writer to do. Similarly someone must impress upon the Union Cabinet to entertain any good idea, when they can be found, from whatever part of the world they may come.
It must be noted that by obeying this writer, the Election Commission obeyed REASON. Similarly, the President of India and the Supreme Court must obey REASON to assure LIBERTY of thought and action without interfering with the just rights of others only. This work clearly shows that some leaders gave public funds to those politically close to them within the Union Cabinet and outside. The Re.44000 crore given to two boys has not so far been recovered. The recovery is for the furtherance justice and not at all to injure their rights. In fact, they have no right to keep this money at the expense of 1000 million people.
The demand to give adequate protection to this writer is a reasonable one.
Therefore, Her Excellency the President of India must do justice to the Nation consistent with the noble Roman saying, “Let justice be done though the Heavens may fall”
As the system tends relapse into its unconstitutional ways, the facts from 11 October 2007 to 19 December 2007 are being sent by email on 19 December 2007 at 10 P.M.
V.SABARIMUTHU
89
A MADONNA
A two judge Bench of the Supreme Court on 21 December, 2007 ruled that the judges were not bound by any judgments. The Bench said that the ruling was applicable to the judges of the Supreme Court as well. .
In this connection, it must be noted that the judgment is consistent with the email sent to the President of India on 19 January, 2008. This is an extension of the judgment delivered on 13-12-2007 by a three judge Bench. It is a revolutionary judgment because now all judges all over India are not bound by any judgments. Thus the BALCO judgment and many other judgments would not bind them. They are
It is clear that when the learned judges enjoy FREEDOM, the common man also must enjoy FREEDOM. When the common man enjoys FREEDOM this work must go to his knowledge. This is not happening in India. This is the sorrow of the Nation.
Further, the convention would prompt the judges to relay on other judgments. Therefore, the merits of this judgment must reach all judges all over India through an education programme. Furthermore, this judgment must be respected by the Supreme Court. Otherwise, this would go into oblivion.
Above all, as the reasoning of a learned judge, at times, becomes a function of his social origin, there shall not be a majority for Forward Communities, Backward Communities or Scheduled Castes/ Scheduled Tribes in any important Benches.
No wonder that after noticing the judgment a Union Minister said that the judges should have thorough knowledge of the issues to write judgments. He warned that a judgment could change the direction of the entire economy of the country. He explained that judgment could not be given for spectrum allotment for mobile phone service providers without knowing what spectrum meant.
Anyone could discern the nervousness of the Union Minister to the judgments of the Supreme Court. It is clear that the Supreme Court could have prevented all manipulations.
Whatever the spectrum meant, all right thinking people would say that the allotment is like giving money to some individuals. Therefore, the spectrum must be divided among various States to mint money. Alternatively, the BSNL could be split and handed over to the States along with additional spectrum for the prosperity and well being of the people. A Union Government that acts in good faith alone would do this.
In the meantime, the militant people killed 12 police personnel in Chattisgarh State.
On 23 December 2007 the police killed two Pakistani militants in the UP State.
On the next day, the army killed two militant people in Jammu and Kashmir.
An adviser to the Union Government resigned. The newspapers reported this on 29 December, 2007.The newspapers added that three officers had earlier resigned in the recent past. It must be noted that the newspapers did not report anything as and when the officers resigned.
The newspapers disclosed that the Initial Public Offering (IPO) of a private company to remove Re.15000 crore would come out on 15 January 2008.
Benazir Bhutto, the leader of the Pakistan People’s Party, was assassinated on 27 December ,2007. When asked , if he had the blood of Benazir in his hands, the President of Pakistan, General Pervez Musharraf, said that he was not a feudal or a tribal. He said that he had been brought up in very educated and civilized family that believed in principles, values and character. He added that his family was not one that believed in killing or assassinating people.
Every national leader in India must look at the face of Indians and say that he was brought up in a civilized family that believed in principles, values and character. He must say that he does not want to give public money to anyone to preserve his position in India. He must say that his family is not the one that believed in denying FREEDOM to his people as it is equivalent to assassinating them. He must say that the works of Indians would not diminish but enhance his reputation.
The extremist people killed 7 Central Reserve Force personnel in the UP state on 1 January 2008.
The Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) and an Indian private steel company on 3 January, 2008 formed a joint venture for coal mining in the ratio 50:50 within the country.
Experience shows that any joint venture between a public sector company and a private company would be an unequal one. Generally, it would be to the advantage of private parties only. The agreement must be revoked.
A Union Minister on 7 January, 2008 said that he had no control over the entire economic agenda because of democratic structures and coalition politics. He, further, said that the Pay Commission recommendations would be a great burden to the Government.
It is true that in order to attract and retain talents the IAS officers would have to be given Re.30000 to 40000 as starting pay. It would be a burden to the Government. But it is imperative that the quality of Government service must be improved. In order to meet the challenge, the Service Tax could be extended to postal charges, courier charges and many other fields. A small tax may be imposed for domestic and international air travel. The revival of the pension scheme also would yield a huge income.
Now debit and credit cards are being used to buy commodities. Licenses could be granted to people all over India to give money against these cards. A small amount could be collected as Service Charge or Transaction Charge. The banks could reimburse the money to them everyday. This would give employment or additional income to about ten lakh people without much investment. This would obviate the necessity of ATM centres in villages. This would save the travel expenses of the people. The old age pensioners also could be permitted to withdraw pension using a debit card. Incidentally, it would make the Government also richer as the Government would get Transaction Tax.
A three judge Bench of the Supreme Court on 8 January, 2008 declined to delete the word “socialist’ from the Constitution of India because the word gets different meaning in different times. However, the court issued notices to the Centre and the Election Commission. In this matter, the petitioner –for strange reasons- is approaching the Supreme Court instead of Parliament.
The newspapers on 12 January, 2008 said that the Indian Railways was taking necessary action to lease its surplus land to private parties.
In this connection, it must be stated that the Government bought the land from the people for a throw-away price. Now, the Government must return the land to the original owners or to their legal heirs. The act of transmitting this land to private parties is immoral and un-constitutional.
The Initial Public Offer (IPO) of a private company was oversubscribed more than ten times on the opening day on 15 January, 2008. The company had obtained the clearance of the three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court for the IPO.
Apparently, the public sector banks and the
Furthermore, this work would show that a man willing to give money like this alone could remain as a national leader in India. All other political leaders would have to remain as State level leaders. If a national leader were reluctant to do this job, the manipulators would search for a person cut out for this job. Apparently, they are now searching for stand by leaders. This shows that the agents of the manipulators alone could run the Nation. By concealing this work, the agents keep all the ballot boxes in India in their pocket and ridicule the people to seize power through the aid of the ballot box. In this way, they are very successful in creating an illusion of democracy in India. This is the wretched condition of the political structure in India.
In this matter, it is the duty of the Election Commission to keep the ballot box in a neutral place. As it is not doing this, the Election Commission is enacting a bigger coup against itself.
There is no use in repeating everything to the political leaders, learned judges or others. Now everything depends upon the mind of the President of India. The President has an onerous responsibility to change this political structure. The President must know that a man acting in bad faith in public matters is a greater menace than a generous foe. When once his object is gained he would leave the President and the Nation in the lurch. He would prove a turn-coat in the end. Just as he plots against the people by concealing this work, he would plot against the President to the detriment of the Nation. Therefore, even Re.1/- should not be arbitrarily given to any company, lest it would go down as an unconstitutional act. There is no difference between giving Re.1/- and giving Re.100000 crore. The President should not hesitate to accept responsibility for all acts of the Government.
The President of India must note that the banks are free to buy the shares only. They are not free to sell them because the share prices would fall. The Constitution does not permit the banks to go on buying the shares like this.
The President would say that nothing unconstitutional took place in the present IPO. This would not inspire confidence because the illegally privatized Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) have not been taken back. Some PSUs were sold violating the guidelines devised for such sales. Even those PSUs have not so far been restored. The President is permitting some private parties to convert public funds into private assets abroad. Despite several emails, the President has not rectified this and several other public wrongs.
The above company that came out with a public issue is a sister company of a charge-sheeted company. Giving money to this company through the aid of the stock market is immoral and unconstitutional. Due to the combination of such reasons the money given must be recovered forthwith.
The President must note that whenever the evil exists in one place, the good also exists in another place. Eventually, the good destroys the evil. This is the dominant theme of the great epics of India. Swami Vivekananda did not want to make perfect all women. He wanted to make a thousand Madonnas-incarnations of “Divine Mother”- before his death. Now, a Madonna would be sufficient. For this the President should administer impartial justice.
The important facts from 20 December, 2007 to 15 January, 2008 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 16 January 2008 through email.
V.SABARIMUTHU
90
DUTY
The email sent to the President of India on 16 January, 2008 might have disturbed the manipulators. They might have told the Prime Minister to clip the wings of this writer. Therefore, the Prime Minister on 17 January, 2008 said that he would pray to God to give him courage to be graceful under pressure. He added that political power was societal trust.
The newspapers on 5 February, 2008 said that the Initial Public Offering (IPO) of a private company was oversubscribed by 72 times. It wanted about Re.12000 to 15000 crore. But it got bids for Re.7,50,000 crore! This is more than the total income of the Union Government for 2007-2008! The money would be utilized in all directions with devastating effects.
Slighting this work, State Bank of India, Punjab National Bank, Bank of India, Indian Overseas Bank and some other public sector banks bought the shares or advanced money to buy the shares. No political party opposed it. It did not reach the consciousness of the people either. Obviously, those who possess power in India thieved this money. But they do triumph! This is consistent with the saying that any thief can triumph if he steals ENOUGH.
In this connection, it must be stated that when the Mumbai stock market sensitive index fell from 20000 points to 17000 points, a Union Minister said that he would not advise the public sector financial institutions to do this or that. He added that the institutions were the best judges to invest money based on the valuations. However, the financial institutions reiterate that they act as per the orders from the top.
It is clear that the Union Minister is not ready to accept responsibility for buying the shares of arbitrarily chosen companies. As a former lawyer, he would not like to face trial for the arbitrary actions of the Union Government. If this Union Minister were not ready to accept responsibility, the Prime Minister of India also would follow suit. The President of India, other Union Ministers, Supreme Court, Bank Managers and the investigation agencies also would wriggle out. Then, who is responsible for choosing the companies? Evidently, this behaviour to rule a nation, if adopted by all men, would render social life impossible everywhere.
The Prime Minister of Britain Mr. Gordon Brown, came to India on 20 December, 2008 to give impetus to Indo-British trade and strengthen bilateral relationship.
Accepting the honorary degree of D.Litt by Delhi University, Mr. Brown said that he had been a lecturer in a university and that he had to leave rationality and honest pursuit of truth after entering politics.
A Supreme Court judge, on
The Law Commission Chairman and former Supreme Court Judge said that the judiciary, over the years, allowed aggressive materialism to overtake its true purpose.
Her Excellency the President of India, in her Republic Day address to the nation wanted the Government to deepen the democratic institutions ensuring transparency in the functioning of the Government. She pointed out that the citizens had both rights and duties. She said that every citizen is responsible for the progress and the future of India just as everyone would have to bear the blame for the shortcomings. She acknowledged that corruption as an evil that afflicted the system and therefore wanted the Government not to waste even Re.1/- through corruption. She requested the Government to see that the people all over India are benefited by the higher growth rate of India. For this she wanted the involvement of the people for the effective implementation of the projects. Further, she said that the Government, civil society and every citizen would have to work collectively for the growth of the society. She wanted everyone to protect the multicultural, multi-religious and multi-ethnic character of India. Finally she pledged that India would continue to work with international community to create a better world - a world free of terror, poverty, disease, ignorance and inequality.
Anyone would tell that the speech of the President, apparently, is the essence of the work of this writer. The President encourages this kind of works by citizens. Apparently, the President also wants to give FREEDOM and, therefore, DEMOCRACY to Indians. The President wants the involvement of the local contractors for finishing Highways and other projects. In other words, the Government should not do various works with its own contractors and present them to the people. The President, again apparently, considers the act of arbitrarily investing even Re.1/- in shares as an act of corruption. However, any one would tell that the ground situation is different from the one desired by the President.
During the Republic Day, the President of India honoured many personalities with various National Awards. Bharath Retna- the highest civilian award - was not given to anyone although some of the recipients of these awards deserve it.
Curiously, the President of India presented a National award to a Union Cabinet Minister presumably for the silent role played by him for the denial of FREEDOM to Indians. One would say that he is not responsible for it. But any one who is NOT responsible for concealing this work is NOT the
The distinction between the above Minister and other Union Ministers is that the former did ENOUGH to deny FREEDOM. The present Prime Minister and one or two political leaders would be presented with Bharat Retna award as they have done more than ENOUGH to deny FREEDOM to Indians.
Many get rewards, awards, honour and even public adulation for their service or achievements in life. This makes the recipients happy. But, it is said that the achievements of a person must make him feel that he is really WORTHY of happiness.
Mr. Nicolas Sarkozy, the President of France, was the Chief Guest for the Republic Day parade.
Though it is a digression, it must be pointed out that Societe Generale, the second largest bank of France, lost Euro 4.9 billion due to the stock market related manipulation of an individual.
In the meantime, militant people killed six police personnel in the Chhatisgarh State.
In the West Bengal State, six people were killed in police firing on 4 February, 2008.
Dishonouring this work, Rural Electrification Corporation Ltd (REC), a Public Sector Undertaking (
In this connection, it must be reiterated that the PSUs belong to the people of Assam and other states. Now the people of Assam are not the possessors of the shares of this
As the Government does not allow the above viewpoint to percolate to the masses, the sale is out and out unconstitutional. In fact, the Government has forfeited its moral and constitutional right to exist. Sooner or later the Government would have to quit office due to this work.
The President of India on 12 February, 2008 requested the corporate houses to inculcate an ability to function profitably while obeying law, rules and regulations.
Anyone would now tell that the President of India simply failed to check misuse of power. This work comprising over 500 pages also went in vain. The remedy is giving FREEDOM to the people. The denial of FREEDOM is the EVIL in India. Those who deny FREEDOM are the real enemies of the good. Therefore, it is the DUTY of the President of India to wage a war against the denial of FREEDOM in India.
In order to wage this war, it is essential that the President of India must identify the individuals present in the camp of the EVIL. There may be relatives, friends or even the masters of the President in the enemy camp. It may give pain when the actions hurt their feelings. It may give happiness when the actions achieve the goal.
Further, in order to wage a war against this evil, the President must possess a good will –a will to protect the Constitution of India regardless of profit or loss to the office of the President. The President would have to go beyond the conventions. It may be to the advantage or disadvantage of the President. In this matter the President should not mind about her happiness but must do her DUTY. By doing the duty, the President would achieve perfection in her and happiness in others.
Therefore, the President of India must place DUTY above everything. The duty of the President is not to love the evil but destroy the evil force that denies FREEDOM to Indians. This is what the sages say. This is what the political philosophers like Kant say.
The facts from 16 January, 2008 to 12 February, 2008 are being sent to Her Excellency the President of India on 13 February, 2008 in the profound hope that the President would feel herself
No comments:
Post a Comment