Thursday, March 13, 2008

How Everything Happened in India - Part III

53

 

CORRUPTION

 

 

Now, the newspapers reported that the 17.5 acre Mumbai Textile Mills   belonging to the public sector National Textile Corporation of India was sold for Re. 702.2 crore to the Delhi based Real Estate Company. At the same time, Apollo Mills, another NTC Mill, was sold to another company for Re.180 crore. The media said that the bids for other NTC Mills as well as Kohinoor Mills would be opened by the end of July 2005. No one opposed these sales. No one was opposing the impending sales either. As there was no discussion before or after the sales, no one was in a position to say that the Government was flouting public opinion. When there is no public opinion, nothing would restrain abuses of power!

In this connection, it must be noted that the newspapers, presumably to justify the sale, disclosed that the previous Government sold Jupiter Mills in March 2004 for Re.276 crore. It is obvious, that the former Prime Minister did not go ahead with the sale of Mumbai Textile Mills and Apollo Mills although he had ample time to sell these properties. It is also clear that he might have agreed to the sale of Jupiter Mills very reluctantly due to the pressure from the back room players. Therefore, he, apparently, wanted to get rid of the manipulators by advancing election by eight months.

 The sale of the NTC Mills by the present Government without any debate or discussion at any level strengthens the hypothesis of this writer that the former Prime Minister abdicated power just to escape from the hands of the manipulators and some of his close colleagues. The present scenario shows that some top leaders in the BJP stood by the former Prime Minister. The present sale of the NTC Mills at Mumbai forces one to think that it is partly the gratis of the former Prime Minister that all other PSUs escaped from privatization. When one considers the circumstances and the sadistic forces that surrounded him, it might go down as his service to the Nation.

It is pertinent to point out that the Government is not selling these properties for want of money because Re. 2,60,000 crore is rotting in the PSUs alone as surplus funds.

It must be noted that the people of Delhi, and not the people of Assam, Kashmir or Kerala, bought these Mills. As usual, the latter would get bullets only. Had the capital of India been at Trivandrum, the people of Kerala would have enjoyed the spoils of joining the Indian Union.

Further, recently, a Congress leader – believed to be the most powerful person in India- not only halted the evacuation of the slum dwellers at Mumbai but also went there to console the victims. In order to demonstrate the sincerity of the Government, the leader could have asked the Union Government to give the closed NTC Mills to the Slum Clearance Board. Alternatively, the leader could have asked the Union Government to sell the NTC Mills to the Government of Maharastra for the same purpose. But the leader has not done so. Even now, the sold properties shall be taken back for this public purpose. This is not for socialism or Russianism. This is not anything against globalization or liberalization either.   This is simply to address the human rights issues of the victims of evacuation. This decision would have better consequences. After all, slum dwellers remain shelter less not due to tsunami or earthquake. When the people all over the world vie with one another to ameliorate the sufferings of the neglected people, why did the Union Government fail to withstand the onslaught of the property developers and back room players even after 52 letters? Why should the Congress leader go to console the victims? These are the questions, all right thinking people in India ask to themselves.

Further, the Government might be right in selling the NTC Mills to property developers. However, why did the Government sell them without any publicity? The people might construe the sales affected in the darkness of night as theft.

Three years ago, when the Chief Minister of Assam proposed to sell the plantations of the Government of Assam, this writer gave a suggestion to him to sell the same to the plantation workers. The request was written on the margin of one of the above letters. The Hon’ble Chief Minister of Assam was quick to retract and the plantations, to the knowledge of this writer, were saved. As the media brigands did not publish anything about the sale of the NTC Mill at Mumbai before actually affecting the sale, the desires of the media brigands and a few in power, could have been controlled by the desire and wisdom of the President of India. But the President did not do his duty.

On 25 June, 2005 the Director of Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) met the Prime Minister and spent 90 minutes with him. Though the media brigands described this as a meeting in connection with the issue of tiger poaching, it could have been to put the plunderers of the public on a straight and narrow path only by the most rigid of controls.

The newspapers reported that the surplus funds of 50 PSUs in India as on June 2005 was Re. 2,59,576 crore. The petroleum PSUs had a reserve of Re.89,486 crore and the BSNL had Re. 50,518 crore. The paper said that the PSUs had a plan to invest about Re. 88000 crore only. As the Union Government wanted the private parties to mint money, the oil Public Sector Undertakings also were invariably benefited.

The Economic Times reported that the banks got a huge amount as service charges during 2004-2005. According to the paper, this amount more than compensated the loss incurred due to the fluctuations in the lending rates. This is consistent with the letters of this writer. Obviously, there need not be much difference between deposit rates and lending rates.

As a reply to the letter No.52 dated 22 June 2005,  an official of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), on 27 June, 2005 said that the SEBI was contemplating strong action against vanishing companies and unscrupulous promoters particularly those companies that amassed crores of rupees from gullible investors on the 1990s primary market boom. But nothing happened afterwards.

A private company on 21 June, 2005 said that it would supply diesel at doorstep. It was described as their innovation. In this connection, it must be noted that any Government that acts in good faith could have granted permission to all people to sell petrol, diesel or kerosene. It is strange, that the Government is not doing this even after 52 letters. Now, the King of Trivancore or his subjects, who die in starvation, shall not trade in diesel but one or two individuals from other States could do so in Trivancore, which is now in Kerala State. This situation could be changed provided the Chief Ministers express their desire for such changes.

The two-day National Development Council (NDC) meeting was held in Delhi on 27, 28 June 2005. All Chief Ministers attended the meeting. The Prime Minister superficially talked about a candid review of the economic policy. He said that a scheme would be devised to lessen the debt burden of the States. These were the two concessions - consistent with the letters of this writer- that came out from the Prime Minister.

Further, he talked about public- private partnership for the development of infrastructure.

In the meeting, the Prime Minister pointed out the necessity to ensure “minimum security of tenure” to the IAS officers. The Prime Minister has been saying this right from the day of assuming office. In this connection, it must be pointed out that the stakes placed several officers in key positions with an eye on manipulation during the NDA rule. Disturbing them would not be in their own interest. In fact, it appeared that the first thing that the stakes asked the present Prime Minister to do was to spare the officers from transfer.  But, some Ministers, apparently, expressed their desire for transferring some officers. One way to resist their demand is talking about the virtues of ensuring “minimum security of tenure” to the IAS officers and the Prime Minister himself is doing this job successfully.

Curiously, the Prime Minister said that the Government after reducing its role as licensor or controller in many sectors was assuming the role as an umpire. In this connection, it must be noted that in the light of 52 letters anyone could discern that the Government made a private company and a few others the licensors and controllers of India. It must be noted that the Prime Minister talks such things quite naturally without the slightest compunction.

The Chief Ministers, during the National Development Council (NDC) meeting, apparently, did not touch anything present in the letters of this writer. The media brigands might have suppressed their words. However, the Home Minister said that there must be probity in public life. He went to the extent of saying that any Government that is not transparent cannot be recognized as good Government. This indicated the strengthening of the constructive forces and the weakening of the destructive forces within the Congress party and in the Union Cabinet. However, future alone would prove or disprove this hypothesis. The Home Minister, reluctantly, used to talk like this.

One welcome development was that the public sector TV, for the first time, gave some importance to the Chief Ministers. Thus, it showed the faces of all Chief Ministers- while they were talking- through a special programme in its news channel on 27 June, 2005 at 9.30 P.M. This is consistent with the “facts” that generated the letter No.52.

The Foreign Minister of Pakistan on 26 June, 2005 said that Pakistan desired peace with India as it wanted to focus on poverty reduction rather than defense expenditure.

A Union Minister on 28 June, 2005 signed a “defence framework” with the USA at Washington. Earlier, the USA had given him a grand welcome that included a guard of honour. 

On 29 June, 2005- speaking on “India: The Next Decade” at the Chatham House in London- Mr. Jack Straw, British Foreign Secretary, said, “India, which maintains high standard of human rights and in whose legal system we trust, is not racing the world to the bottom, but to the top. British and other national companies look to India not just for low-cost call centers, but for services at every level of expertise and skills”.

A newspaper on 29 June, 2005 said that the performance rating of the Prime Minister was high and that none could attack him personally. The paper said that the moral capital of the Congress leader was increasingly diminishing. In this connection, it must be stated that the people all over India even now repose their faith in the objectivity and neutrality of the Congress leader. Then, why does the moral capital of the Congress leader decrease? Is the Prime Minister not solely accountable for the conversion of bank funds into foreign exchange? Does the present UPA Government a Government of immoderate persons far from the scene of action? As the President of India is close to the scene of action, the President alone knows everything. 

Some newspapers on 30 June, 2005 reported the decision of the UPA Government to sell four more Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) - Tyre Corporation of India, Nepa, Richardson & Cruddas and Tide Water Company. None in India knows the compulsions behind these sales. None in India knows whether it is for furthering the privatization policy or not. The media brigands are not discussing the pros and cons of the sale at all. Showing that all other Governments would behave as they do; those who possess power are blind to the facts of power. In fact, the proposed sale shows that the Government is under the control of the “fifth force” alone.

In this connection, it must be stated that the present UPA Government has the mandate to rule India. It is now out and out FREE to do what is right for the Nation. The Government could sell any PSU including the remaining NTC Mills. However, the common man fears that these acts are unconstitutional in nature. If the Government were correct in its approach, it would be consistent with the General Will” of the 1000 million people.  It is said that the “General Will”, will always seek the general good. So long as the “Will” of the Government is for the good of 1000 million people, there is no necessity to be deterred by these letters at all. However, Rousseau says that the “General Will” is infallible. According to him the “General Will” is always right. He firmly says that men must never forget that they come together for the sake of the good life and should do nothing to make that good life impossible.

The President of India on 30 June, 2005 visited the tsunami affected Nagapattinam. It was his first visit after the tsunami. This is consistent with the letters of this writer. He might have compared the quality of the houses built for tsunami victims with those built for the earthquake victims in Gujarat. In a song composed for tsunami victims he said that the people of India would overcome all odds with knowledge, courage and hard work.

An Indian private company took over The Pierre- a 41-story hotel in New York through a contract. In this connection, it must be noted that the entrepreneurs are the backbone of any country. However, entrepreneurs must be distinguished from manipulators.

The President of USA, Mr. George Bush, on 1 June 2005 cited Mrs. Indira Gandhi as saying “poverty and underdevelopment are the biggest pollutants”.

A Union Minister on 1 July, 2005 said that the Government should become open and flexible to private entrepreneurs. He said that it was not just enough providing a land or infrastructure to attract industrialists but the mindset and attitude of the Government should change.

An Indian private company bought Tyco Global Network (TGN), an undersea network, at a cost of $130 million.  TGN has offices in Virginia, New Jersey, London, Paris, Mandrid, Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Singapore and Tokyo. In this connection, it must be noted that the above Indian company has acquired huge assets in many countries including the USA, South Korea, Singapore, Spain, Iran, and Egypt, all within one year of the UPA rule.

The US Senate on 1 July, 2005 blocked through 333-92 votes the CNOOC Ltd,  a Chinese Company, from buying Unocal Cop, an oil company of the USA, for $18.5 billion. The sale was blocked because the deal, according to the senators, was a threat to the security of the USA.  In this connection, it must be noted that the USA is a country wedded to free market economy and capitalism. Further, Unocal is a private company. The Board of Directors of this company has no right to sell their own company for commercial reasons to another company! This indicates that a company cannot be free to buy the assets of others or sell its own assets to others in the USA as freely as in India.

In this connection, it must be noted that the senators in the USA blocked the sale in the supreme national interest. In contrast, India, in bad faith, provides public money to foreign companies to set up factories and to extract, exploit and export minerals.

In order to buy the above oil company, there were reports in the Indian media that China gave $ 2 billion to the Chinese company as subsidy. None in India knows the veracity of this news.

On 3 July, 2005 the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) said that a British company sold trucks to Sudan in violation of the UK Government ban on military sales to Sudan. The company, however, considered it as a company registered in India.

On 4 July, 2005 a Supreme Court vacation Bench refused to stay the June 24 order of the High Court, Madras, which justified Common Entrance Test (CET) for professional courses. In this connection, it must be noted that the action of the Government of Tamil Nadu would have done justice to all. A small reservation could have been provided for those affected by the decision. Alternatively, the Supreme Court could have directed the State Government to introduce “Educational District wise” reservation based on the CET to do justice to all. Instead, the Supreme Court rejected all contentions of the Government of Tamil Nadu. The consequences of the judgement would be very bad. Even according to Jeremy Bentham, one action is better than another only if it produces more happiness.

Now, 75% of the populations in India have no representation in the IITs. Further, 50% of the seats in the Medical Colleges in Tamil Nadu go to improvement candidates. Similarly, 60% of the seats in the IITs go to the so-called improvement candidates ie to those who take the IIT-JEE examination for the second time. This affects the quality of the students in the IITs. In other words many students enter the IITs through the back door depriving the chances of the students of many States. This could be remedied by allotting a definite number of seats for each State. The President of India could have done yeoman service in this matter. Plato says that the life of every individual has meaning only from the function he performs in the organism of the State.

Some newspapers on 4 July, 2005 reported that cash surplus Indian companies acquired 26 foreign companies within three months of the financial year 2005-2006. During this period, the foreign companies bought 20 small Indian companies that too for small amounts only. Naturally, thanks to the recent unconstitutional decision of the RBI, Indian companies are vying with one another to buy foreign companies. Anyone could smell a rat in it. There must be a well thought out plan to make available the deposits in the banks and the foreign exchange for private investments in India and abroad. This is causing economic deprivation all over India. This policy cripples the ability of the State Governments for public investments. They are not in a position to pay salaries to employees. The downsizing of employees continues as usual. Yet, they have no money for payments. The Union Government too is withdrawing itself form making huge public investments. Where does the money go? The Union Government considers bank funds and the foreign exchange as private money meant for private investments.

The recent decision of the Government is the most unfaithful and unconstitutional action ever taken by the Union Government after independence. If the possession of foreign companies were imperative for the development of Indian industries, the Government could have bought them directly.  Naturally, about fifty companies, instead of mobilizing money from the public or borrowing money from the Indian banks for investments in India, are looting the banks and the foreign exchange for buying assets abroad. Obviously, the system is consciously making the good life impossible for everyone.

The Oxford University on 8 July, 2005 conferred the honorary degree of Doctor of Civil Law to the present Prime Minister of India.

In the meantime, the Hon’ble Prime Minister of England, Mr. Tony Blair, acknowledged the receipt of the letter as:

 “Thank you for your kind words and good wishes. I appreciate you taking the time to write. My best wishes for you and your family”.

It must be mentioned that the entire family rejoiced over the letter.  Many who came to know about this in the village and in the college were also happy. A few elders in the village gently prodded. In fact, they are very proud of this. This could be discerned from their nods and smiles. The Prime Minister of England extending his best wishes to the “family”of an individual in a remote corner of India is a significant one in many ways. It might contribute to compensate the lack of public opinion in India. The knowledge that the people – after exhausting all avenues in India - are inviting the attention of the world leaders to the plight of 1000 million people in India might prompt the Supreme Court, investigation agencies, National Human Rights Commission, Government, President and the leaders to bring constitutionalism in India.

The Hindu on 7 June, 2005 published an article written by His Excellency the President of India. It was based on the interaction of President of India with Jain Muni Acharya Shri Mahapragya a few days ago, which was not reported by the mass media. It is reproduced below.

“Conscience is the light of the Soul that burns within the chambers of our psychological heart. It is as real as life is. It raises the voice in protest whenever anything is thought of or done contrary to righteousness. Conscience is a form of truth that has been transferred through our genetic stock in the form of the knowledge of our own acts and feelings as right or wrong. Conscience also is a great ledger where our offences are booked and registered. It is a terrible witness. It threatens, promises, rewards, and punishes, keeping all under its control. If conscience stings once, it is an admonition, if twice, it is a condemnation. Cowardice asks, “Is it safe?” Greed asks “ Is there any gain in it?” Vanity asks, “Can I become great?” Lust asks, “Is there pleasure in it” But conscience asks? “Is it right?” Why have we become deaf to its voice? Insensitive to its pricks?  Callous to its criticism?

The answer is corruption.

Corruption is an assault on consciousness. The habit of taking bribes and seeking favours has become very common. People holding important positions have developed inconsiderateness to their conscience. They pretend everything is all right. Do they not have an idea of the law of action and reaction? Have they forgotten how impressions of the conscious mind and their force work? If you take bribes, your thoughts and actions are registered in the subconscious mind. Will you not be carrying forward your dishonesty to your next generations causing them great suffering? It is a painful reality that corruption has become a way of life affecting all aspects of living, personal as well as social. It is not merely the pecuniary corruption but other forms as well. Immoral ways of people holding high positions and handling power have taken away guilt from the minds of lesser mortals. What a dangerous situation? A great civilization is endangered.

A virtuous man alone can use the instruments of conscience. He alone can hear the inner voice of the soul clearly. In a wicked man this faculty is dead. The sensitive nature of his conscience has been destroyed by sin or corruption. Hence he is unable to discriminate right from wrong. Those who are leading organizations, business enterprises, institutions and Governments, how can they be corrupt? Is it not wise to have a clean conscience and enjoy freedom from anxiety and all kinds of worries? If you do wrong actions and sinful deeds and treat them lightly today, you will not hesitate to perform various crimes tomorrow. If you allow one sin to enter and dwell in your conscience, you pave the way for the entry of a thousand sins. Your conscience will become blunt and lose its sensitivity. The habit of doing evil deeds will pervade the whole body like the poison of a scorpion.

Do you know when you are corrupt, your children who are indeed enjoying the fruits of your corruption are mocking at you? After all they are well informed and knowledgeable. Your parental mask is too thin to hide the contempt of your children. You are no more the role model of your own children. Is this disgrace not enough? Our society is fast reaching a stage where the immunity of conscience is challenged by the corruption, as HIV would do to the body of an AIDS patient. The corruption has seeped into every stream of our lifeblood. Can we save ourselves as a civilization?

Spiritual leaders have evolved morals, codes, and teachings of righteousness. Beautiful hymns, songs and prayers have been written and composed. But the annihilation of conscience by corruption appears frightening. Religion has not been effective in evoking conscience. Who then will? Can our conscience be redeemed?

A movement for the Foundation for unity of Religions and Enlightenment of citizenship (FUREC) against corruption has to be made as a new feature”.

The meaning of the above message of the President of India is obvious. The President is able to distinguish between entrepreneurs and manipulators. If this message were clubbed with his earlier utterances, the President, apparently, wants the extirpation of manipulators and exuberant growth of entrepreneurs. The message shows that the President is not ready to condemn the Constitution to die and that he might succeed in separating the natural political leaders from those groomed by the stakes. He might also succeed in identifying the person who makes that good life impossible for 1000 million people.

It must be noted that these are the harshest and most hurting words ever used by any President against his Government. The Hindu alone published it as an article supplied by the President himself. Though The Hindu published it, none in India noticed it. Those who read it might have thought that the President was talking about some abstract things. In fact, any news will become news only if a  flavour were added to it.

It must be also noted that the above words of the President of India are the result of 52 letters. It is the repercussion of the letters sent to the world leaders. The President of India, Members of Parliament, Chief Ministers, political leaders and the world leaders would think of the plight of 1000 million people and contribute their share – however small it may be- for their emancipation through the restoration of constitutionalism in India. Therefore, no more letters would be necessary. However, as the Government is selling the PSU Mills secretly and hurriedly in bad faith, the facts from 22 June, 2005 to 11 July, 2005 alone are being sent to His Excellency the President of India through e: mail on 12 July, 2005.

 

V.SABARIMUTHU


54

CIVIL SOCIETY

 

         

 

Now, the newspapers reported the decision of the Union Government to auction the loss making Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). Many loss making PSUs are located in the heart of cities and as such they could be used for the construction of hospitals, bus stands, old age homes or playgrounds. The common man writes this again and again because the media brigands do not report the news and views of ordinary people.

The Prime Minister called on the President of India on 13 July, 2005.The media brigands immediately concocted a story and said that the meeting was in connection with the impending Cabinet expansion. Apparently, the Prime Minister used to call on the President for every letter. Anyhow, it was the first time that the media brigands reported the existence of a meeting immediately after an email.

The G-8 countries decided to improve the regulatory frameworks over the companies to control green house gases. Whether the G-8 countries contemplated anything to control the manipulations of the companies and the media brigands or not was not conveyed.

The Union Government on 14 July, 2005 permitted the big nine PSUs to make investments up to Re. 1000 crore each. The other PSUs were granted permission to make investments up to Re. 500 crore. It must be noted that about Re.2,50,000 crore is rotting in the PSUs. The people believe that the Government has been inhibiting their growth for the last 15 years as if they were for sale. What would the Government do with the huge deposits in the banks and the surplus funds of the PSUs? Why does the Government refuse to use public deposits for public investments? What would the Indian engineers do with all their know-how? Will anyone tell the reason? Do the Members of Parliament keep their fingers in the pie? Is it not their real function?

Now, there were reports that the public issue of the public sector Syndicate Bank was oversubscribed by 32 times. The media brigands did not publish the views of the public in this matter.  52 letters also went in vain as the Government rejected the demand to reserve the shares to various States. This shows that the Government is still in the hands of the fifth force. As there is subversion of free expression none in India could do anything to restrain abuse of power. The Government that flouts the latent public opinion or that inhibits the growth of public opinion would do any crime against the society.

            The President of India also fails in his duty. 

Some newspapers on 16 July, 2005 described the present Prime Minister of India as one of the most honest, intellectually endowed and selfless prime ministers in the History of India. They depicted some other Union Ministers as selfless individuals. It must be noted that the Prime Minister is reaping the reward for his acts of manipulation in this way. The word, honest must be read and interpreted in the light of the July 7 message of the President of India.

On 16 July, 2005 the 52 letters and the relevant facts comprising 274 pages were sent to the Hon’ble Chief Ministers of Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Chhatisgarh, Goa, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Orissa, Punjab, Tripura, Utter Pradesh and West Bengal. Earlier these letters had been sent to the Chief Ministers of Kerala, Karnataka, Andra Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir and Rajastan on 6 July 2005. 

On the same day, the Prime Minister, on his way to the USA, said that he would safeguard the interest of the nation till the end of his life. His words conveyed the impression that he did not intrigue against the nation to seize power and that he is not maneuvering against the children of the nation by concealing these letters. In other words, one would think that he does nothing to make that good life impossible for 1000 million people.

On 17 July, 2005 some newspapers reported that a foreign company would invest $25 million or Re. 1100 crore in the Orissa State in India. The stakes in India, in order to buy assets in foreign countries should not facilitate foreign companies to possess huge assets in Orissa. Public assets shall not be exchanged for interests. This is because the deal appears as practical adjustments of interests. In fact, none in the mother country of the above company   is now opposing the take over of their companies by Indian companies.

 Further, did the Government of Orissa approach the Steel Authority of India (SAIL) for extracting iron?  Does the Government want to hand over the public deposits in India to foreign companies by allowing them to extract money through public issues?  The President of India might have talked to the Chairman and the senior officers of the SAIL in this matter. As such the President of India alone knows whether the deal would damage national interests or not.  Therefore, the Chief Minister of Orissa, President of India or any other competent authority in India must dispel the darkness from the mind of the people. This is not for impeding the progress and development of Orissa State or India. It is a matter that would affect the destiny of 1000 million people, as the money all over India would be extracted. It must be noted that the Chief Minister of Orissa is not giving a reply even after receiving a CD containing “How Everything Happened in India”.

 The USA gave a red carpet welcome to the Prime Minister of India on 17 July, 2005. The USA had never given such a grand reception to any Indian Prime Ministers in the past. The President of USA, Mr. George Bush, unequivocally said that India and the USA were committed to democracy, freedom and human rights. On one or two occasions the President of the USA described the people of India as “great people of India”. Further, he said that the Indo-US relationship had never been so good.

Addressing the US Senate, the Prime Minister of India said the reforms in India were durable and irreversible. Presumably because of these letters, he attributed the slackness of the reforms in India to the fear about the unknown. He described India as an open democracy.  Therefore, he said that the Government could proceed only through consensus. The Members of Senate profusely clapped hands while the Prime Minister entered the Senate Hall. Besides, they clapped hands 32 times during his 40-minute speech. The industrialists from India and the USA were also present in the Senate Hall. They joined the Members of the Senate in clapping hands.

With regard to the Security Council membership, the Prime Minister said that the voice of the world’s largest democracy could not be left unheard.

India and the USA pledged to counter all forms of terrorism.

The USA agreed to achieve full civil nuclear energy cooperation. India, in turn, agreed to place its civilian nuclear reactors under the IAEA safeguards.

The USA and India committed themselves to promoting “stability, democracy, prosperity and peace throughout the world”. They agreed to assist other societies in transition seeking to become democratic. In fact, the word “democracy” was mentioned in several other places. It appeared that the President of the USA wanted India to be more democratic and more open for the salvation of not only the 1000 million people of India but also the entire world.

Now, the Left parties in India did not oppose the understanding to achieve Indo-US civil nuclear energy co-operation.

A newspaper on 22 July, 2005 wanted the people to cherish those who possess great talent rather than envying them and begrudging their success. It said that just allocation of admiration is a virtue that requires judgement and integrity: judgement to distinguish genuine talent from mere showiness, and integrity in refusing to bestow praise on those who do not fully deserve it.

A Supreme Court Bench on 19 July, 2005 cancelled 81 petrol pump allotments that were granted on extraneous considerations.  Thus, the Supreme Court cancelled the allotments made by the NDA Government to its kith & kin. Now a private company alone is permitted to allot 5000 petrol pumps to its kith & kin and the Supreme Court sits as if it were immune to environmental changes. Does anything in the Constitution- Liberty, Equality or Fraternity- justify it? In this connection, it must be stated that a judge in the Bench forfeited the right to hear cases in the Supreme Court long before this case. Yet, the Chief Justice secretly constituted this Bench to extract this judgement. The President of India must have noticed it and acted firmly and decisively. In the present matter, despite 52 letters to His Excellency the President of India, the learned judges of the Supreme Court have utilized their sovereignty to deny the rights of 1000 million people. They have proved that their instinct is better than the Constitution. The July 7 message of the President of India showed that his blood boiled on seeing the 52 letters. Now, it is strange that the President of India has no inoculation against this kind of tribalism.

The Government on 21 July, 2005 directed the CBI to probe the Centaur Hotels disinvestments case. It was the first indication that the ground under the Prime Minister was slipping away. However, people believe that many officers in the CBI were appointed to cover up Himalayan manipulations. In fact, the CBI Director is now conspicuous by his absence in the TV channels. This is in contrast to the days of the UF Government when the media brigands and the back room players manipulated the public sector TV and showed the then CBI Director everyday mainly to  destabilize the then Government.

Not withstanding the 52 letters, the Government sold another 9 acre Mill belonging to the NTC for Re. 441crore on 21 July 2005 to a company connected with the former Union Minister, who had a net asset of Re.2.5 crore while joining the Union Cabinet

 Tender for the public sector Elphinstone Mill - acquired by the Government in 1983 as a sick Mill- could not be opened because the sale was challenged by its former owner. The unconstitutional nature of the sale could be discerned. In fact, the land belongs to the people. Even many kings in India considered themselves as controllers of land and not as its owners. The protection of public property was their Divine Duty. It did not occur in their mind to sell public property to private parties to amass wealth either for themselves or for their kingdoms. Now, on the one side of Mumbai the people want space for housing and on the other side the Government has vacant lands, which could be utilized for housing the evacuation victims and other slum dwellers. However, the Government treats vacant property as private property that could be sold to any private party.  Obviously, the Government, despite 52 letters, proceeds as if the common good of the nation is something other than the good of all citizens. Alternatively, the Government believes that there is no such thing as common good of the nation.  Did the other people benefit by the sale? Is it not big with tribulation for other people?  Anyone could read such instances in history.

In this connection, it is pertinent to point out that the sale went in the predicted lines i.e. when everything is for sale some Union Ministers themselves would like to buy one or two PSUs. Obviously, this deal strengthens the hypothesis that the former Prime Minister advanced the election to control the desires of his colleagues. It must be noted that people hesitate to exhibit even one tenth of the manipulated wealth.

On 22 July, 2005 all the 52 letters were sent to the Prime Ministers of Norway, Sweden, Netherlands, Canada and the Chancellor of Germany.

Besides, the same matter was sent to some Members of Parliament in the profound hope that the ultimate good would be reached by free trade in ideas.

The Government and the media brigands succeeded in subverting the free expressions of the leaders, Chief Ministers and the Members of Parliament in this matter. In fact, the media brigands sent all those who received the CD into oblivion. Thus, the public sector TV used to show a particular Member of Parliament periodically. Now he is not seen at all. Whatever the media brigands do, the letters will have a profound impact on the system in the long run.

The Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) having an asset of Re.60,900 crore and a NRI company having an asset of Re. 96,800 crore, on 23 July, 2005 signed an agreement to form two joint venture companies for exploration of oil and gas assets related business abroad. As per the agreement the ONGC would have 49.98 percent and the NRI Company would have 48.02 percent shares. The remainder shares will be with the financial institutions. The NRI said that it was his small help to his motherland.

 Just like the deal with other foreign companies, the above agreement, apparently, subverts the Constitution by making possible practical adjustment of interests. Evidently, it is a new predicament of 1000 million people. The political philosophers say that every new predicament calls for a new political philosophy to resolve it.

In this connection, it must be noted that a collaboration or competition   between a Government company and a private company of this kind would be an uneven one by reason of the following reasons.

1.The media brigands always demand privatization of all PSUs. Therefore, the NRI would pocket all these joint companies in one-way or other within a span of, say, five years. In fact, many believe that an understanding to hand over these companies to him must have preceded this agreement.

2.The money from the ONGC would be siphoned off to these companies.

3. The employees of the ONGC did not express their happiness presumably because they fear that the agreement might be a ploy to extract the expertise of the ONGC.

4. The net asset values of all PSUs are increasing by leap and bounds even without any collaboration with private companies.

5. During the years 1991 to 1995, the NRI companies in the UK were working in the back rooms of power in Delhi to extract huge amount from the Indian public- as high as Re.48 for every local call- in the name of cell phone charges.

6. Some believe that the NRI companies had been poaching for the PSUs in India including the Air India, Indian Airline and the oil PSUs. They believe that the NRIs now manipulate the system with the help of the media brigands and some chosen men in the Union Cabinet.

7. Many believe that some NRI companies are the elusive fifth force- the latent force that controls the system - in India. They believe that they – during the last 15 years - have removed from India more than what all others in India have removed.

8. The new Government, in bad faith, refuses to restore the illegally privatized PSUs. It refuses to give answers to several unanswered questions.

9. Many people suspect that the friends and relatives of many Union Ministers are becoming entrepreneurs presumably because of such agreements.

10. The militants kill innocent people. They give no reason for their acts. Similarly, the political leaders, Members of Parliament or the public were not allowed to discuss the pros and cons before signing this deal. The agreement occurred like a blast, more powerful than any other blast in the Kashmir State.

      Despite everything, some people with superior knowledge might propagate the view, which Ford expressed: “We now know that anything which is economically right is also morally right. There can be no conflict between good economics and good morals.”

These people might reject the contentions of this writer as village economics or wrong economics. These people might believe that the income of India would multiple due to these ventures only. As man ought to aim at the happiness of everybody in general, the President, the Government or any other competent authority must convince the people that the decision would benefit other people as well and it would not alienate the hard earned money of the Indians in the long run. If it were not done, the other people would consider this as an unconstitutional deal struck by besotted exploiters to remain in power. It must be noted that the media brigands- immediately after the deal- described the Prime Minister as the only honest man among otherwise corrupt politicians. Thus a newspaper on 28 July, 2005 described the Prime Minister as an honest man and an efficient administrator.

On 24 July 2005, the Chief Justice of a High Court said, “The people have the right to criticize judges because they are supreme. They are our masters and as masters, they have the right to criticize their servants. They have the right to take the judges to task if they do not discharge their duties properly”. The Chief Justice said this recognizing himself as the master of people. Otherwise how could the media brigands publish his words and black out the words of other judges and the man in the street?

 It is pertinent to note that it was the above Chief Justice who, apparently in bad faith, on 27 June 2005 struck down the order of the Government of Tamil Nadu that abolished entrance test for professional courses. The Chief Justice overshadowed the other member of the Bench in this issue. In order to pronounce this judgement, the Bench relied on Article 14 of the Constitution, which aims at equality.

The people of India prescribed to themselves Article 14 for equality. The aggrieved people might have got liberty if the court had obeyed this. Using this noble Article the learned judges deny equality to 75% of the people! Thus all their hopes end in vain because now the Article 14 remains as the cause for their inequality and misfortune. Locke says that where there is no law, there is no freedom. Jeremy Bentham says that it is always bad to produce more pain than pleasure. The judgement gave pain to 75% of the people and pleasure to the rest. This is not to say that the entrance test is not necessary. It is only to say that the method of selection or the nature of entrance examination should not deny the just chances of others.

It is pertinent to note that a newspaper on 5 August, 2005 commended the above Chief Justice. The media brigands would never praise a judge without purpose. Further, all those who broke the Constitution had been in the good book of the media brigands for a long time. Many learned judges of the Supreme Court talked like this before or after chocking the Constitution. Apparently, the newspaper wants to see him in the Supreme Court very soon. In fact, within days he was elevated to the Supreme Court.

A newspaper on 24 July, 2005 chided the Chief Minister of Kerala for attacking the media. On the next day another newspaper warned the Chief Minister of Andra Pradesh State, that he was “under watch”. In contrast, the latter paper said, “the polity must benefit from the fortuitous circumstance of having the most honest politician as the Prime Minister”. No other political leaders in India would get such pleasing words even if they were ready to spend Re.1000 crore.

The Haryana State police led the striking employees of the Honda car factory at Gurgaon into a trap, cordoned off and beat them as a retaliatory action for attacking a senior police official. The employees were striking work demanding the reinstatement of four dismissed employees.

Now, the newspapers demanded the disinvestments of the shares of the PSUs, including the BHEL, by propounding a new theory. According to the theory the Government had a fiduciary duty to privatize the remaining shares in the PSUs to increase the long-term shareholder value. The message is obvious. Everyone in India must notice this. Further, the paper demanded the Government to “find a way of dealing with Left allies”. The meaning of the latter message also is obvious.

The two top leaders of the BJP advised the Members of Parliament of their party to sit inside the Parliament rather than boycotting it. They said that the practice of boycotting the Parliament created a wrong perception in the public.

In the mean time, the President of Pakistan wanted everyone to find out the root cause for terrorism.

The European Commission on 26 July, 2005 proposed that all banks throughout European Union (EU), register the name and address and account number of every client making money transfer both in EU and abroad. What prompted the European Commission to take this decision is not known although it is consistent with these letters.

The CPI (M) on 27 July, 2005 alleged that the son-in-law of the former Prime Minister played a role in the Centaur Hotel sale and demanded a CBI probe into the matter. The son-in-law, however, denied it.

The President of India came to Trivandrum on 27 July, 2005 for a three-day visit to Kerala State. On the next day, the President called on His Highness Uttharadam Thirunal Maharaja – the heir to the throne of Travancore. This is consistent with the letters of this writer. It is a tribute to the selfless service of the predecessors of His Highness. Now, anyone in India would tell that the heirs to the throne of many erstwhile kings deserve honour and a better position in the community simply because most of their predecessors led the kingdoms in good faith. The way in which they now conduct themselves in society even when some of them are being forced to prepare pickle for survival must be noticed.

An explosion killed ten people in the Delhi-Shramjeevi Express train on 28 July, 2005 in Utter Pradesh. The blast took place near the toilet of the train.

As soon as the CD –How Everything Happened in India-  sent to the MPs reached their hands, the Cabinet Committee on Political Affairs met at New Delhi. The CPI (M) also met separately and decided to support the Government so long as the Government does not deviate itself from the Common Minimum Programme (CMP). To this a Union Minister said that the Government, in deference to the views of the Left parties and the letters from the public, decided to abandon the proposal to sell10% shares of the BHEL. The Government further clarified that the decision of the previous Government to privatize 13 other PSUs had been also annulled.  The word “letter” was used by Thinakaran- a Tamil daily only.  It must be noted that this is the first time anyone in the Government is talking about the letters from the public. Many other changes that took place in Delhi still remain under an “iron curtain”.

The Government of West Bengal on 29 July, 2005 deferred the sale of its 36% stake in Haldia Petrochemical Ltd to a private company. Similarly, it retracted from giving 5000 acre of land to a company from Indonesia. Apparently, the Chief Minister himself retracted or the CPM leadership discouraged him from selling the PSUs and from amending the land ceiling laws.

On 29 July, 2005 the militant people in Jammu & Kashmir State took five people to a forest, slit their throats and fled. On the same day, there was a gun battle between the security forces and the militants. Two militants and two security personnel were killed in the battle.

In this connection, it must be stated that the militants have their own dynamics. Equitable distribution of “assets & seats” would have contributed greatly to peace. However, nothing is moving in this direction although killings continue unabated.

 

On 30 July, 2005 the following letter was sent to the Prime Minister of Japan.

 

From

V.SABARIMUTHU

Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. 629167 Email: sabarimuthu@rediffmail.com

INDIA

To

Mr. JUNICHIRO KOIZUMI

Hon’ble Prime Minister of Japan

Tokyo

Your Excellency

            52 letters addressed to His Excellency the President of India and the facts that generated these letters are sent in this CD under the title “How Everything Happened in India!” The letters would show how 1000 million people in India are reduced to mere slaves.

The letters sent to the world leaders have a momentous effect on the system in India. This bit of information would also lead to the emancipation of 1000 million people in the long run.

 

This letter is sent in good faith, as human rights recognize no borders.

 

 

 

                                                Thanking your Excellency

 

Vellicode                                                                                              Yours faithfully

30 -7-2005.

 

                                                                                                       (V.SABARIMUTHU).

 

             On the same day, similar letters were sent to the Prime Ministers of Portugal, Belgium, Spain and Australia. A letter was sent to the President of China also.

            The Prime Minister on 30 July, 2005 said that the market men getting editorial control over newspapers would harm freedom of press. The Prime Minister said this after the concealing this work from the people. It is the reason why Plato says that the State must be properly led. He says that power must not be given to those who will abuse it either for their own selfish interests or in pursuit of a misconceived common good such as wealth or power. Aristotle also says that the State that pursues wealth or power does so at the expense of others and so stirs up strife. He says that power must rather be given to those who will use it aright to turn men’s souls to the pure light of truth. Therefore, if the Prime Minister were true to his words and if he did not want to subvert free expression, he could publish all letters and the facts one by one in all newspapers at the cost of the State. However, the tragedy is that many who possess power believe in the theory “a wise ruler cannot and must not be true to his words”.

            In order to maintain the buzz activity in the industry and service sectors a Union Minister on 30 July, 2005 said that the resurgence in these sectors should not be dampened by wrong politics or wrong economics. 

            The leader of the DMK party on 31 July, 2005 said that the Other Backward Classes (OBC) were denied the benefit of quality higher education in the IITs, IIMs and other prestigious educational institutions and demanded the Union Government to extend the benefit of reservation to the OBCs. It must be noted that the DMK is a coalition partner of the present UPA Government. The Union Government is yet to take a decision to reserve the seats to various States for unity and integrity of the nation is another matter.

            A Member of Parliament belonging to Congress Party, said that his party was ready to pass a resolution in the Parliament forbidding disinvestments in the big nine PSUs beyond 51%. According to him, this would make privatization without the approval of the Parliament impossible for any future Government. In lieu of this, he beseeched everyone to allow the Government to sell the remaining shares over and above 51% to the favoured people. He was not interested in reserving the shares to various States. He was demanding this with a purpose. Later, he was made a Minister of State for his manipulation value.

            The President of India on 2 August, 2005 said that the citizens expected righteousness from the leaders.

            On the same day, a Union Minister said that the letters received from workers and “others” opposing disinvestments in the BHEL were under consideration. Thus, the word “letter” was used for the second time. In this connection, it must be stated that this writer did not oppose the sale of shares of the PSUs at all. What this writer wanted was to apportion the shares to various States in an equitable way.

            Another Union Minister on 3 August, 2005 said that 17 sick PSUs including the NTC Mills, Tyre Corporation and Madras Fertilizers were identified for rehabilitation.

            On 4 August, 2005 the Prime Minister of Japan, Mr.Junichro Koizumi, abandoned a meeting that discussed the postal privatization issue. On August 8, the House of Councillors, upper chamber of Diet (Parliament) rejected by a margin of 125-108 a set of privatization bills for postal privatization. About 22 members of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) voted against and eight others abstained. Mr. Junichiri Koizumi immediately called a snap general election.

The Postal Department of Japan has 400,000 employees and $3 trillion under savings-and-insurance schemes. It is not clear whether “How Everything Happened in India reached the hands of the Prime Minister of Japan or not. Whatever happened, one could now say that the Postal Department of Japan has escaped privatization for good. “How Everything Happened in India would strengthen the forces that opposed privatization of the postal department provided the letter reaches everyone who matters in Japan. In this connection, it must be noted that Japan has been falling towards privatization not due to fiscal deficit or starvation but only due to the media brigands and indigestion.

            The Government of Kerala has signed a Memorandom of Understanding to give 100 acre of land at Cochin on a 99-year lease for the construction of “Smart City” with the condition to take it back at any time if the objectives were not achieved. It went down well with the people. The people perceive this as something done in public interest.

            On the same day a Tamil newspaper reported that the Union Cabinet cleared a proposal to increase the financial assistance to the States.

            On 6 August, 2005 China arrested a reporter from Hong-Hong allegedly on the charges of spying.

In the meantime, some newspapers discussed the different facets of the speech delivered by the Prime Minister at Cambridge University.

The Speaker of Parliament said that the Members of Parliament must debate various issues constructively and usefully. He added that devolution of financial powers were essential for development.

The essential items were airlifted to Manipur due to a blockade launched by All- Naga Students Association, Manipur (ANSAM) from June 20, 2005. The intensity of their agitation came to light only in the first week of August 2005. The blockade is very disturbing because the system is not coming forward to give the quota of the “seats & shares” to the people of Manipur or allowing them to keep a small foreign exchange. Why does the system hesitate to discharge its simple duty? The Union Government is not giving any reason for denying this. In fact, this should have occurred as a natural consequence of democracy and not based on militancy.

The IITs, IIMs and PSUs belong to the people of India. Their representatives sitting in Parliament could very easily give to the people of Manipur and others their due “seats & shares”. Similarly, the people of Manipur could have been permitted to buy and sell the commodities that do not disturb peace. This would have eliminated such predicaments.  Now, the system consciously says, “Those who volunteered to remain in the Indian Union must accept slavery”. Naturally, when the rights are denied, people, as a last resort, revolt. Even otherwise, if the rest of India were not ready to give to Manipur, say, 0.5% of the seats in IITs.NITs,IIMs and other Class I services and equal percentage of shares of PSUs, what could be the obligation of Manipur to remain with India?  According to Bentham, the State is primarily a law making body, a group of persons organized for the promotion and maintenance of happiness, and acting through law to that end. The words of political philosophers are quoted again and again in the profound hope that the President and the system would listen to their words.

According to reports there were great doubts and uncertainty among the European Union with regard to the question of admitting new members and strengthening existing internal political ties and institutions.

On 10 August, 2005 a newspaper said, “Businessmen and workers of rich countries are tyrannized by India and China. It is likely that in the next 10-20 years, Indian MNCs will be feared just as Microsoft, General Electric and General Motors are today. Indians will be honoured with titles of cruel, greedy and exploiters. Are we ready to assume this role?” The same paper added, “Indian companies are planning to make big investments in Bangladesh…… One, a condition may be imposed that Indian companies investing abroad will not impoverish the host country by large scale remittance of profits and royalties.”

With reference to the above observations it must be noted:

1. By writing like this the paper has unwittingly done great damage to Indian corporate houses. This is because all countries and their representatives might take notice of this, although some countries would ignore it due to different reasons.

2. The paper says that Indian companies would bring back at least 25% of their profits and as such it would lead to plenty and prosperity to Indians. However, all right thinking people believe that it is far from truth. They believe that Indian companies must be distinguished from foreign companies in this matter.

3. The paper says that large-scale remittance of profits would lead to the impoverishment of the host country. The truth is that large-scale removal of public funds from Indian banks would lead to the impoverishment India.

4.  The policy that allows conversion of public funds into foreign exchange is a very dangerous one. If the Indian currency depreciates, a fraction would come back. If it appreciates, no money would come back as the loan could be repaid using internal resources.   

5. One should not imagine that their observations are directed to this writer. At the same time one cannot ignore it either. “Indian companies would subjugate Bangladesh. None in India shall disturb it”. This appears to be the message of the article.

6. Above all, the stakes in India could stand in the path of any individual in India. They could give or deny job to any individual in one pretext or other. What offence did these children do? This is the extremity of slavery. Had all the PSUs remained in the hands of the Government and had all PSUs been allowed to expand, those who were denied jobs in this way would have found some other route to escape. Does the paper want the children of other countries to suffer like this?

 A Congress leader on 11 August, 2005 requested the youth to “work positively and not negatively for the country”.

With regard to the sale of public sector hotels by the previous Government, the CBI on 13 August 2005 said that a then Union Minister intervened and helped the company to raise funds through the LIC, various nationalized banks and others. This revelation is in conformity with the forecast that the NDA Government converted public properties into private properties using public funds. It is also consistent with the presumption that the close colleagues of the former Prime Minister divided among themselves the assets of the nation. Further, this revelation reinforces the hypothesis that the former Prime Minister and the Home Minister, in spite of commanding majority support in the Parliament, advanced the election by over eight months just to wriggle out from their close colleagues.

In this connection, it is pertinent to point out that the above Minister had been a protagonist of privatization. He had claimed that privatization of all PSUs would bring plenty and prosperity to India. He had threatened that all Public Sector Banks would become bankrupt. Everyone in India believed this. Many thought that he was discharging his Divine Duty to make India rich. In fact, none could question his integrity although some right thinking people smelt a rat in his words when he attributed the decisions to the then Home Minister and the Prime Minister.

 Further, the media brigands described the above Minister and two or three of his colleagues as the most honest people in the NDA Cabinet. Some media brigands described him as a crusader. On 23 February, 2003 a paper described him as one ‘among the few good men’ and a ‘maverick martyr’. This paper said that his ministry was ‘burning midnight oil’ without any peon, perks or power. The paper  added that he carried his economic background, his journalistic skills, academic studies and activist modus operandi into the political arena”. The adjectives used to plunder the nation could be discerned.

 Whatever happened, it is clear that the media brigands are portraying any leader as honest man and black out all his wayward behaviours for the purpose of depriving 1000 million people of their property. In fact, the media brigands deceive 1000 million people and plunder public property in cold blood in this way. The Union Ministers who indulge in wayward behaviours are stabbing their own leaders from the back is another matter. If the Union Ministers begin to plunder Re.thousands of crore through simple manipulations, what would the people do? Who are the actual criminals in India? Does any manipulation, in bad faith, by any Union Minister at any time in any way less severe than the act of killing innocent people or bombing big buildings? Will any law in India protect any minister if he asks any bank in his official capacity to give money to someone close to him? Why does the CBI hesitate to confiscate at least the visible assets of ministers even after such revelations?

            Now, the UPA Government is not ready to confiscate the privatized property. This is the reward of the UPA Government to the people, who still repose their faith in the present leaders.

On 12 August, 2005 a seven-judge Bench of the Supreme Court abolished reservation for various communities in all unaided educational institutions and unanimously held that they had absolute rights to admit students of their choice in all courses including professional courses. However, they defeated the purpose of their own judgement by forbidding those institutions from profiteering by collecting capitation fee and by stipulating a 15% quota for the NRI students.

 The court did not talk about the fate of the agreement between the Government/University and the managements for granting affiliation. This agreement is akin to a contract. Men register their agreement to come together under certain rules and norms in a society. In fact, almost all private professional colleges prefer to remain under some rules to set up a right society. Rousseau says that such a contract would change man from “a stupid and limited animal” into an “intelligent being and a man”. Apparently, the judgement has abolished this contract also.

Further, neither did the media brigands publish the arguments of the case nor did the Supreme Court direct them to publish them. In fact, most of the cases now-a-days are heard in the darkness of night. However, this time the Indian TV  showed the face of the Chief Justice of India for one or two seconds. This is partly consistent with the demands of this writer.

In this connection, as a seven-judge Bench handed down the judgment, the protagonists of the judgement say that the prestige of the judgement is great and it would be strictly implemented and profiteering effectively prevented. Even if the judgement results in the collection of capitation fee, the protagonists consider this as a good step for the exponential growth of private institutions in India. Another, perhaps a valid point, is that when the admissions are based on the mark sheets i.e. merit; many frustrated students go to the foreign countries to pursue medical and other courses. This leads to flight of capital and loss of jobs. Still another point is that India needs many entrepreneurs and curtailing private initiatives of small entrepreneurs would affect the progress of India. The people also want investment opportunities.

 On the other hand, the antagonists of the judgement demand total nationalization of professional colleges. The Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, even threatened to nationalize all professional colleges in his State.

The moderates among the antagonists demand the conversion of all private educational institutions into aided institutions.  They compare the present method of banning capitation fee to the policy of banning toddy to sell brandy. These people believe that the Government would simply fail to prevent the educational institutions from collecting capitation fee and that the present judgement would enable the private colleges to collect more capitation fee than before. They believe that the learned judges are making fair things into foul things and vice versa to the detriment of the society. In fact, a series of bad judgements shocked two students studying law in Tamil Nadu State and as a protest they attempted self-immolation. Perhaps, the students did not see a way to escape from the predicament. Considering everything, the antagonists say that the learned judges of the Supreme Court are denying the existence of a civil society in India and that a vaccination is urgently needed.

Whatever the merits and defects of the judgement, everyone in India would agree that education is the most important industry in India. Everyone would say that the teachers in all educational institutions must be well paid directly by the Government to attract and retain talent. Everyone would say that the teachers should not inculcate a slavish mentality. At the same time, everyone would demand education for all kinds of students to control flight of capital. Considering everything, everyone in India aspires to convert all educational institutions into aided institutions. As fee could be collected, it is easy and feasible. A great responsibility rests on the Members of Parliament in this matter. The Chief Ministers and the political leaders who believe that they can, a very great responsibility rests on them also.

It is pertinent to note that when a Member of Parliament raised this matter in the Upper House all Members expressed similar views. Anyone could discern the concern of the Members of Parliament to set up a right society in India. The rare unanimity indicates that the good exists and that the 1000 million people have a chance to escape from the present predicament.

A Congress leader went to Mumbai on 12 August, 2005 to console the victims of flood caused by heavy rain.

On the same day Air India recommended JM Morgan Stanley to advise it on its share sale. This is not to say that the shares of Air India shall not be sold. It is not to say that the shares of Air India should be sold to the King of Travancore either. It is only to say that Air India belongs to the subjects of the King of Travancore and the people of other States and the Union Territories in India. Therefore, the shares should be sold only after reserving them for various States and Union Territories. All those who possess power must examine whether they have any right to divest the people of their legitimate shares in the PSUs. It is said that history does not repeats itself only because men read its elementary lessons and determine not to repeat mistakes.  The moment men determine to repeat mistakes history repeats itself.

Militant people in Andra Pradesh (AP) State killed a Member of the Legislative Assembly belonging to the Congress party and eight others who accompanied him for the Independence Day celebration on 15 August, 2005. The Government of the AP immediately re-imposed the ban against the militants. It gives great pain because innocent people are being killed everyday in one place or other. Every Chief Minister must consider it as an incident that happened in his own State. The Chief Ministers could definitely save their people not only from militancy but also from slavery. In other words, they could work for the emancipation of their own children. For this, they must consider the question of paying more attention to submit their own States and their own money for creating entrepreneurs from their own States. It is not to say that the Chief Ministers must indulge in manipulations or narrow mindedness. It is only to say that when a Chief Minister develops the children of his State by protecting them from unwarranted exploitations, he is contributing his share to the development of entire India.

It is a well-known fact that the licenses granted to some clever people to import cell phones and other electronic items are creating millionaires in India. Why do such powers do not be in the hands of the Chief Ministers for dissuading the youth from militancy? It gives greater pain to think of the fact that the system, despite 52 letters, is not ready to apportion the “seats & shares’ in an equitable way. If “A” from the State “X” could start an air service by exploiting the financial institutions and the Mumbai Stock Exchange, why can’t “B” from the State “Y” start an air service exploiting the Stock Exchange of their own State? In fine, if they could secure for their States and for their children the rights granted to some individuals today, 90% militancy would disappear from India tomorrow. However, nothing could be achieved without some sacrifice from everyone is another matter.

In his Independence Day address, the Prime Minister said that the future of India was extremely bright and that he wanted economic growth with social justice. He said that corruption in Government would not be tolerated and that there would be no barrier between the people and the Government. He wanted the political system and the leadership to show sagacity, wisdom and foresight to make India truly a great nation. He added that the world wanted India to do well and take the right place on the world stage. With regard to Kashmir, he wanted Pakistan to dismantle the entire structure of terrorism and solve the issue through peaceful means.

The Prime Minister did not say whether the future of India would be bright with or without the privatization of the PSUs. Thus, it is impossible to decipher the meaning of the words of the Prime Minister on crucial matters. In fact, he wants the so-called reform although the meaning of reform is not known to anyone. The Prime Minister said that the world wanted India to do well. It is not clear whether it is in any way connected to the letters sent to the world leaders or not.

On the same day, there were reports that the World Bank gave a loan of Rs. $289 million. India has a foreign exchange of over $140 billion. Why does India seek loan from the World Bank? Why does the Government refuse to use the foreign exchange for the large-scale development of India? Does the Government want to transmit it to the stakes to buy assets abroad? It must be reiterated that all unfaithful actions of the Government are unconstitutional in nature. The President of India alone knows whether India needs loan from the World Bank or not now.

On 16 August, 2005 a newspaper wanted to establish that the British rule was worse than the present rule. It said that between 24 million and 29 million Indians died in famines in the era of British rule. It said that according to the report of the East India Company, close to 10 million people had died of man-made famine during 1770-1772 and over 6 million humans perished in 1876. Quoting from Late Victorian Holocausts by Mike Davis the paper said that in 1876 while a week long feast was conducted for 68,000 guests to proclaim Victoria Empress of India, not less than 100,000 subjects were starved to death in Madras and Mysore. During the era of Viceroy Lord Lytton huge amount of grain was exported to Europe while millions of Indians died of starvation. Further, the paper said that countless Indians died in wars waged for the British. It is strange that even in those days; the East India Company maintained statistics for the starvation deaths taking place at that time. In contrast, over half of the entire people die today die of starvation and that the Government has no statistics for the same! A small monthly pension to everyone above 60 or 65 years alone would change this situation.

On 17 August, 2005 another newspaper said that the communists, who demonstrate for free expression and freedom of the press, deny free expression. The paper said that an employee of a Malayalam newspaper was sacked for just making a remark about the General Secretary of the CPI-M. Similarly, he said that in the then USSR, Pravda- meaning truth- had been propagating bundles of lies. The message was that the media brigands in India also has been using their freedom to deny free expression in India and that 1000 million people must live with it.

Mr. Paul Wolfowitz, World Bank president, on 20 August 2005 said that the World Bank was ready to lend US$3 billion over three years to India. The World Bank had been lending money to India when there was dearth of foreign exchange. Now, India has a foreign exchange of over $140 billion. Why does India borrow $3 billion? Why does the World Bank lend money to India?  These are questions every man in the villages asks to himself. They, perhaps out of ignorance, consider this as practical adjustment of interests by those in power. This also is a new predicament of 1000 million people.

On 21 August, 2005 a newspaper said the Prime Minister was fighting various fires from within and outside his party. The paper added that the Congress leader was supporting him because there was no alternative. This shows that the Members of Parliament expect their leaders to give answers to all unanswered questions. The rapidity of the manipulations would have bewildered them. Unconstitutional manipulations always undermine the confidence of the leaders to lead a nation. This is the reason why several letters were sent to His Excellency the President of India, in vain, to save the leaders from large-scale manipulations.

The Prime Minister on 21 August, 2005 said that the people must redress their grievances through sustained dialogue and democracy. On hearing this one would think that the Prime Minister would allow freedom of expression, publish these letters and save democracy for the benefit of the posterity. One would expect him to prevent large-scale manipulations also. However, future alone would prove or disprove this hypothesis.

A Union Minister on 22 August, 2005 said that the oil prices would increase. In fact, he saw “no alternative”. In this connection, it must be stated that the finances of the Government would not be affected by the removal of tax component because the payment for 75% of the oil is in foreign exchange. None in India is talking about this. The media brigands are always worried over lower oil prices. They refuse to say that lower oil prices would make Indian products competitive. They refuse to discuss the utility of the foreign exchange in these situations also.

The President of India on 22 August, 2005 recommended a flexible entrance examination system. He said that Albert Einstein did not perform well in the entrance examination although he did well in the Mathematics component. A professor noticed it and granted him admission. The words of the President of India are complementary to the 52 letters. In this connection, it must be noted that in India what the professor did would be construed as an illegal recommendation although simple recommendations had created outstanding personalities. For instance David, who lost his eyesight in his early years, could become a celebrated doctor thanks to a recommendation of an alert professor.  Therefore, the President too is, apparently, making a recommendation for lifting all children all over India by fixing a quota to every State. This would mitigate the strife in many parts of India. However, the Members of Parliament must unite as in the so-called “quota case” to set up a right society.

In view of the new predicaments, the facts from 12 July, 2005 to 23 August 2005 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India today at 8A.M.on 24 August 2005 through e: mail.

 

V.SABARIMUTHU


55

 

A DRIVING FORCE

 

         

The Hindu on 24 August, 2005 said that the equation, Reform = Privatization, had lost its meaning and that many countries all over the world were taking it for granted.

A Union Minister informed the Parliament on 24 August, 2005 the decision of the Government to set up a new commission to look into the issues of Centre-State relations in the light of the changes that had taken place in the economy of India since the Sarkaria Commission recommendations. What happened to the decision is not known to anyone.

 The media brigands reported the displeasure expressed by the Chief Justice of India, over the criticism of the Members of Parliament and the others against the recent judgement that abolished Government quotas in private unaided educational institutions. The Chief Justice had said that the Government was going after the verdict without understanding it. The Chief Justice told the Attorney General to tell his client to give the respect the courts deserve or close them down.

Some newspapers on 25 August, 2005 also deplored that the Members of Parliament thrashed the judiciary on the “quota case” without understanding the arguments. Had the Supreme Court directed the media brigands to publish the arguments, the question of misunderstanding their judgements would not have occurred at all.

A Union Minister on 25 August, 2005 informed the Members of Parliament that Re.2021 crore were mobilized through selling five National Textile Corporation (NTC) properties at Mumbai. He said that out of 119 NTC Mills, the Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) had recommended the closure of 66 unviable units and revival of 53 potentially viable units. The Members of Parliament, for the first time, asked how the bidders of the NTC Mills raised money to buy the Mills. Apparently, the Members of Parliament were seized of the manipulations mainly due to this work.

 In this connection, it must be noted that the Government of India could, in the past, start and run these Mills. Now it is unable to run the existing Mills presumably because of the influence of the stakes on the system. 

As the Members of Parliament wanted to know the modus operandi of buying the PSUs, an industrialists on the next day said,

India is suffering under a strong influence of vested interests. Regrettably sometimes this is more often than not from the private sector. Vested interests and political pulls are hurting the progress of the country. What then happens is the policy gets modified, manipulated or changed so that it either serves vested interests or hurts the people,  which eventually makes that policy sort of toothless and ineffective. There is behind the scene stopping of reforms in a spurious manner, because reforms help some, hurt some.

If you are truly a nationalist, it should not matter whether it hurts you so long as it is fair and moves the country forward. But regrettably human nature is not that way.

What we are doing is a lot of back stepping and rolling back…. What is happening is sometimes the policy is being compromised to an extent where it had no strength or is ineffective. We are just treating things based on sometimes sort-term views. Sometimes it is worthwhile to look at the whole policy since things have changed.

I think certainly we cannot keep the subsidies at a level where government deficits become huge, endangering the prosperity of the nations. I think sometimes along the line there has to be hard recognition of some facts. All things cannot be subsidized forever. If crude price went up in the international market, it should find a reflection in the domestic market and to offset the huge subsidy burden, kerosene prices should be increased a bit.

What I think needs to be done is already being advocated at the level of the Prime Minister or at the level of the Finance Minister.

We must not lose the benefit we have from abundant and low cost labour. There is a great deal India can do, which it has lost to country like China.

For manufacturing, to be the factory of the world if you like, we need inputs, which are at the international rates, which India does not have. It needs economies of scale compared to China, which we do not have. We need labour productivity to the extent China has, which we do not have.”

 The New Indian Express in its editorial dated 29 August, 2005 among other things said, “If someone as influential (as, say, x) feels so powerless in combating the strangle-hold of vested interests on policy making, what hope is there for lesser mortals?

He also points to vested interests within his own tribe in the private sector, who are more than ready to sacrifice the interests of the nation for their own venal gain.

A combination of interests working behind the scenes has rendered policy-making completely non-transparent and open to manipulation.

The Prime Minister has a commendable long-term vision but even the occupant of the most powerful office in the country finds himself hostage to petty interests, India’s future will indeed be in jeopardy.

How often do they –politicians, capital, labour- allow short term interests to stand in the way of the country’s progress?”

   

A Koreian company on 25 August, 2005 said that it was not seeking any concession from India that was denied to other players in terms of public policy at the Central and State levels and pledged that the company would not insist on anything that was opposed by the people of India and went against the official policy of India. However, the Government did not tell whether the Government of Orissa State or the Government of India ever approached the Steel Authority of India Ltd (SAIL) before signing the deal or not. Similarly, the Koreian Company did not unequivocally tell whether it would ever raise any money from the Indian public either directly or through Indian financial institutions or the Stock Exchange. All that it said was that it would be akin to any other Indian Company. Further, the reply shows that the company was rattled by the allegation that there was an illegal and unseen adjustment of interests.

On the same day, the Prime Minister said that there were limitations “for the time being” and “we don’t have the broad based consensus in our coalition to assert that I can move forward in a big way”. Perhaps based on the observation of this writer that the Government could convert all private colleges into aided colleges after reserving a small quota for managements to mint money and to encourage private entrepreneurship, he said, “ I have not given up hope. I have full confidence in the patriotism of our Left colleagues to believe that in the final analysis of what is good for India, they will also be on board”. To another question, he remarked: “a politician before he can become statesman has to remain in office for long enough”. The Prime Minister, momentarily forgetting all about his “reforms” said his “first and foremost priority” was “to get rid of chronic poverty, ignorance and disease, which had affected millions and thus finish the unfinished task set out by the founding fathers at the time of Independence”. This is his new realization. However, any one could discern that the system would not hesitate to manipulate the entire nation and its 1000 million people the moment the force of these letters weaken.

With reference to the United Nations Organization (UNO), the Prime Minister said that a “democratic-deficit” prevails in the world body. Thus, the Prime Minister wanted from the UNO what the Government of India denies to 1000 million people.

The Security and Exchange board of India (SEBI) on 26 August, 2005 prescribed a minimum of 25% public holding in all listed companies. It is one of the most important positive steps ever taken by the UPA Government. If implemented strictly, it would pre-empt the listed companies from buying back the shares during natural or artificial fall in share prices. This would definitely weaken the ability of the listed companies to mint money by manipulating the share prices. This matter had been conveyed to the Government earlier. However, the SEBI, to the disappointment of everyone, said that it would implement it in the next two or three years only.

Some newspapers on 26 August, 2005 said that the Left had extracted its pound of flesh in terms of stalling disinvestments. In this connection, the editorial warned that the employed in the organized sector should not hold at ransom the future of the unemployed. In this connection, it must be noted that the important objective of 52 letters was creation of more jobs.

The Government of Kerala, in the meantime, disclosed its decision to start an air service. This decision must be commended. All other States could follow this. Similarly, as the Gulf countries are in the vicinity of Kerala, and as there is no dearth of funds with the people or with the financial institutions, the Government of Kerala could grant permission to start not one or two but ten or twenty refineries – without harming the environment- under public or private sector to supply petrol and diesel to the rest of India and even to the entire world..

Meanwhile a private company said that the company was expecting over a quarter of its revenue coming from overseas operations in the next five years.

The meeting of the State Education Ministers started at 11 A.M. on 27 August, 2005 at New Delhi. Perhaps, on seeing the mood of the Ministers, the meeting was abruptly closed at 11.30. A.M. One or two Education Ministers might have wanted State- wise reservation in the IITs, NITs, IIMs and others. This is not something connected with globalization or privatization at all. Yet, the Union Minister for Human Resources was not ready to hear the words of the Education Ministers. Abandoning the meeting, the Union Education Minister asked them to give the views of their States in writing to enable the Union Government to pass a suitable legislation. The English newspapers did not publish this although a Tamil daily reported it in an insignificant way. Later, the Union Government ignored the views of the Education Ministers and went in its own way. The Union Education Minister spent his time only to suppress the aspirations of the State Education Ministers.

 

The Chief Minister of West Bengal, during his visit to Singapore said, “The Left parties in India are changing the political view of the world and are trying to change the mindset of the workers. You see, communists. We can’t speak anymore about old dogmas. The world is changing. We are also changing. Look at China. The situation is completely different if you compare it to what existed before 1978. The Chinese realize that their position in the world has changed. So, they changed their policies accordingly. Deng Xiaoping used to say ‘ We learn truth from the facts, not from books’ We learned from our experience in India and abroad…We have to formulate new policies. We have to reform our old policies. Otherwise, we will not be able to survive”.

In this connection, it may be recalled that in early 2002 the State Government employees of Kerala resorted to a great indefinite strike demanding salary on par with the Central Government employees. The then Chief Minister of Kerala State showed an empty treasury to them. He, in fact, ran from pillar to post for Re.200 crore for day-to-day expenses. The Governor of the RBI turned his back.  The common man in the State sympathized with the Chief Minister and stood by him to break the strike. Everyone asked, “Where would the Government go for money?”

 As the strike did not come to an end even after one month, this writer requested the Chief Minister of Kerala to consider the question of inviting the employees for talks and giving them an assurance to restore all benefits based on the financial position of the State. Besides, the Chief Minister was requested to consider the question of starting 100 aided or self-financing Engineering Colleges and 10 to 15 Medial Colleges in the State. The request was written on the margin of the copy of the three letters sent to the President of India. The officer who received the letters duly transmitted them to the Chief Minister. The Chief Minister on the next day invited the employees for talks and agreed to restore all benefits depending on the financial condition. Thus the problem was solved. Self-financing colleges were also immediately permitted. This is perhaps the reason why Plato said that a good State accepts human nature, builds upon human nature, and fulfills human nature. Naturally, this is the driving force behind writing 52 letters.

Now, there are 85 self-financing Engineering Colleges and a few Medical College in Kerala State. 15 more Medical Colleges would obviate the necessity to knock at foreign countries thereby controlling flight of capital and loss of jobs. Further, the Chief Minister of Kerala now-a-days grants benefits to the employees before hearing a murmur from them. How is it possible?

Further, the then Prime Minister of India, instead of denying the demands of individuals fulfilled them. In fact, fulfilling and not denying the individuals is the hallmark of democracy. He disallowed many unfair demands of the stakes. Thus the banks and the LIC were not apparently allowed to invest anything in the stock market. At least the former Prime Minister did not exacerbate the errors by refusing to admit that they were wrong. Further, consistent with the letters, the then Prime Minister allowed the interest rates to fall. Consequently, the flight of capital decreased and the economic activity increased. Incidentally, thousands of small entrepreneurs who borrowed money from the banks and the LIC saw a new hope and thus many precious lives were saved. However, before this writer started writing letters thousands of small entrepreneurs had already been eliminated from their ventures as a logical extension of the so-called reform introduced in 1991. These are the real but solid facts.

Coming back, on 29 August, 2005 a Supreme Court Bench directed the CVC to probe the Re. 14,500 crore loan issue of Housing and Urban Development Corporation (HUDCO) within four months. The Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) filed the petition. The CPIL had alleged that the HUDCO had diverted Re.5000 crore to 50 corporate houses without following the usual norms. What happened to the probe is not known to anyone. 

The executive vice president of a private company said, “The Company is open to recruiting students from rural areas. We believe as long as one can get through our rigorous selection procedure, it does not matter where they come from”.  This was the answer to the contention that the private companies selectively blocked the chances of the students for employments.

Some newspapers now demanded that the ONGC must be made accountable to the shareholders and not merely to the Government as the public held 26% of the shares. The paper said that it should not behave like a Government owned company simply because the Government is the majority shareholder. Media brigands had been saying that the nature of the company would not undergo any change so long as the Government held majority shares. Having succeeded in cornering 26% of the shares, they now demand that the ONGC and the other PSUs must be accountable to its shareholders.

The National Integration Council (NIC) meeting was held on 31 August, 2005. Many Chief Ministers, besides key political leaders, attended the meeting.  The media brigands did not give any prior information about this meeting although it was held after a gap of 13 years. The sudden meeting gave the impression that the Chief Ministers formed themselves into an association to secure for their boys a legitimate share in the “assets & shares” of the Nation. The Prime Minister in his inaugural address said that the world wanted India to succeed and set an example of harmony, tolerance, diversity and pluralism in a democratic framework. He added that any group in India could demonstrate their popular support by contesting in elections. The general tenor of the meeting could be gauged from the words of a Union Minister that his party had been demanding amendment of the Constitution to ensure genuine federalism by granting full autonomy to the States. However, the media brigands did not publish even a word of other Chief Ministers that resonated in this direction. Had the media published the deliberations, the meeting would have given the impression that the system in India is not denying but fulfilling the aspirations of the people to set up a right society.

However, a newspaper said that the Chief Ministers were not Chief Masters. The paper on 3 September, 2005 came to the conclusion that the real power had now shifted to the State Governments reducing the Members of the Union Cabinet into mere policy makers. He was very sad that the power of the Chief Ministers would grow under the present conditions to the great peril of national parties. In this connection, the paper deplored that the Union Finance Minister was the least powerful. The paper on one side reflected the nature of the discussion in the National Integration Council. On the other hand, it remained as a portent for the impending manipulations. Later, the wishes of the manipulators alone prevailed.

Thus the Prime Minister on 1 September, 2005 exhorted the people to shun the habit of being excessively apprehensive and think big to grab the new market opportunities to unleash the creative potential of the entrepreneurs. On the same day, the Union Cabinet decided to sell 8 per cent of the equity of the Government in Maruti Udyog Ltd (MUL) to the financial institutions.

In this connection, the Cabinet ignored the consistent demand of the common man that the shares in the hands of the Union Government must be reserved for various States. The shares belong to the people of all States. Now, the shares would go to the favoured people through the financial institutions. This is out and out unconstitutional. This is not to say that the Union Government has no right to sell or buy anything. This is only to say that the Union Government has no moral or constitutional right to deprive the people of their assets. The shares of Maruti would not roll in the hands of the people of Kerala or any other State based on the economic conditions prevailing in those States. All right thinking people would say that the Government is projecting injustice and manipulation in the political system to increase the wealth of not all but a few.

Unveiling the Statues of Gandhi, Nehru and B.D. Ambedkar before the Kerala Legislative Assembly on 3 September, 2005 the Prime Minister said, “ The legislatures must follow the path laid by National leaders. We owe it to ourselves in a manner that is worthy of our people, our freedom fighters, the Constitution and the Republic. As Ambedkar said, cultivation of Constitutional morality among people was indispensable for the successful operation of democracy. There is no point in constructing fine buildings that are pleasing to the eyes, if proceedings within are hardly pleasing to the ear”.

 While the Prime Minister of India was talking like this, there were reports that the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) decided to invest 10 per cent of its assets in equities from the current 8 percent to earn more through higher returns. The LIC would therefore invest up to Re.9000 crore more in the stock market today. Tomorrow, the sensitive index (Sensex) would reach 10000 points from the present 8000 points due to this Re.9000 crore. Day after tomorrow the LIC would take another arbitrary decision to invest Re. 90000 crore (Rs.Ninety thousand crore) in shares so that the Sensex would increase to 25000 points thereby ensuring still greater returns.

The LIC has no right to earn money like this. This is not to say that the LIC should not put good money after bad. This is not to say that the LIC would collapse like the UTI or become bankrupt like some private banks. This is not to say that the LIC would go the way of the HUDCO either. This is only to say that the financial extractions like this leads to militancy and affects the Unity present in the Constitution.  Further, this adds to the misery of the people as it leads to economic deprivation of the states. This creates payment problems to the States. The Prime Minister wants to get rid of poverty. But the Prime Minister himself knows that this is not the way. The Prime Minister himself knows there are several other better ways to earn money. The Prime Minister himself knows that poverty is not reform. Starvation death also is not reform. Promoting flight of capital is not reform. The real reform is to split the LIC into State level units at least notionally.

      Now, the Constitution of India limits the powers of the LIC. Extracting money from all over India and emptying it in one or two States vitiates the basic structure of the Constitution of India. At best the LIC could spend the money of a State in that State. In other words, it shall think of earning money only without impairing the just rights of the States. Money earned from foreign countries also must be disbursed fairly and equitably.   One would say that no law prevents the LIC and banks from investing in shares as at present. This is because of the assumption that the LIC would be just and equitable without them. When there is a Constitution, the LIC shall not expect constant legislation from the elected representatives. Therefore, the LIC cannot and should not defy the President of India as the President of India has a paramount duty to direct the mind of the system towards the good and therefore against evil so that none would wish to misuse power.

      With regard to the installation of statues, it must be stated that the Government of Kerala must have installed the statue of Mulam Thirunal Maharaja before the new Assembly building because he had formed the Sri Mulam Assembly at Trivandrum long before Independence.

In the mean time, 24 CRPF personnel were killed in Chhattisgarh State when the militants triggered a powerful landmine.

India donated $50 million to the USA for the victims of hurricane Katrina. The money would be handed over to the US Red Cross. India dispatched relief materials also.

The Vice-Chairman, University Grants Commission, said that the concern of individuals for human security led to the overall development of the society.

On the eve of Teachers Day, a Union Minister, requested the teaching fraternity not to be misguided by lust for power.

On the next day, the Prime Minister said that the teachers were shaping the future of the Nation.

Now the Chief Justice of India said that the courts could clip the wings of others including the organs of governance. The message is not a clear one. However, it is said that the law cannot have double meaning for the learned judges and the people. The people and the Members of Parliament openly say that there is a nexus between the learned judges and the stakes. If it were not so why does the Chief Justice of India evade the 52 letters before the President of India?

The Chairman of the National Commission for Minorities requested the minorities not to criticize the democratically elected governments with constant complaints of perceived discrimination.  This writer did not notice any criticism against the Government that emanated from any minorities. Further, this writer did not write even a word for or against the minorities. After all, the demand for State wise reservation of “seats & shares” is for everyone. Therefore, it might be a message of the manipulators to this writer. If it were true, it must be stated that the letters have done irreparable damage to this writer. This work, in fact, indirectly gives untold sufferings to this writer. In this connection, one must reckon the opposition from the family. This is not to say that the repercussions were not really guessed.  However, only those directly victimized know the meaning of suffering. When viewed through this angle anyone would say that this writer is wantonly committing mistake after mistake, crime after crime.

Further, it is true that one or two letters were sent earlier to some leaders sporadically. They were written partly for fulfilling inherent human aspirations and partly for discharging social obligations. However, the present series of letters were written only after cogitating over the matter for a long time. The political philosophers were quoted partly to explain the innate human nature and partly to show that this writer owes his knowledge largely to them. It is really amazing that the political philosophers envisaged the predicaments of 1000 million people hundreds, even thousands, of years ago.

Furthermore, anyone could see that this writer is always supportive of entrepreneurs because the society will be lacking in life without them. In fact, they give life to thousands of people although a few entrepreneurs stand on the ruins of thousands of small entrepreneurs. Therefore, it was this writer who first demanded reduction in interest rates to save the small industries, which depended on bank loans rather than on stock market and share prices. It was this writer who demanded substitution of Excise Duty with Transaction Tax to make Indian products competitive in the world market. This writer did not mention directly or indirectly anything when an industrialist removed Re.845 crore from Bank of India because of the firm belief that he would utilize the money to manufacture some hardwires that India imports from China and other countries so lavishly. However, when India was poised to convert public assets into private assets, the Bank of India deal had to be reluctantly utilized to save the PSUs.

Now, the President of India, Members of Parliament, Chief Ministers and many political leaders would definitely think of retrieving the lost PSUs, lest they would feel that they failed to do what they ought to have done during their tenure.

One or two newspapers reported that the Government of India and the All Party Hurriyat Conference came to an understanding on 6 September, 2005 to end all forms of violence in Jammu & Kashmir Stae even as four militants were killed on the same day in the State.

The petrol and diesel prices were hiked on 6 September, 2005.  Everyone felt that the Government could have waited till the total elimination of the tax component before increasing the price. The Union Government could have compensated the Sale Tax of State Governments as well, as the Union Government uses the foreign exchange for imports.  The Government could have taken steps to eliminate the subsidy also, as many perceive subsidy as a ploy to mint money. Even an industrialist is against subsidy. In fact, people hate subsidy in kind although they might love subsidy in cash.  Further, the people do not relish rationing for kerosene.

Mr. Tony Blair, Hon’ble Prime Minister of England, and President of European Union (EU), came to India on 7 September, 2005. On the same day, the Government of India cleared the purchase of 43 Airbus aircraft from the EU for about $2.2 billion. In return, India sought greater market access for Indian goods in the EU. Naturally, the EU would reciprocate amply. Had, the Indian Airlines (IA) and the Air India (AI) been privatized in 2001, Government of India would have lost the leverage to influence the EU. Anyhow, the decision to buy 43 aircraft for the IA is a great step forward. In this matter, Government of India finally broke the stranglehold of those poaching for the IA and the AI for the last 15 years. Now, one would believe that the IA would never go in the hands of the stakes in the name of reform or otherwise although future alone would prove or disprove this conclusion. Incidentally, this is another concrete step of the UPA Government for the progress of the Nation.

The New Indian Express on September 10, 2005 disclosed through its editorial that the Union Government would come out with a bill to provide pension to all the elderly. The editorial described this as a disaster. The reason given was that the Government was already crushed under the burden of the civil service pension. The editorial finally demanded the Government to pass the Pension Fund Regulatory Development Authority Bill.

In this connection, two points must be noted. The first point is that the decision of the Government is a highly positive one. A small pension - even Re.200/- per month- would prevent starvation deaths in India. The second point is that there shall be no Pension Fund. The amount collected towards pension every month shall be disbursed as pension. For this, the Government must assume greater responsibility. In other words, the total number of employees must go on increasing. Assuming that the Government converts all self-financing educational institutions into aided institutions as suggested earlier, the number of Government employees would increase exponentially. The money collected towards their pension shall be utilized for the disbursement of present pension. Incidentally, this step would give life to entire India. The banks and other financial institutions would remain healthy, as these employees would avail themselves of loan. Now, the system is converting the people in villages- even the educated people- into barbarians.

In contrast, any Pension Fund Authority would go the way of the UTI.

Despite the highly commendable decisions, the unconstitutional decision to sell the shares of Maruti and the equally unconstitutional decision of the LIC to invest in the Stock Market show that the Union Government is relapsing into the old ways. Therefore, the facts from 24-8-2005 to 10- 9-2005 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India at 11 P.M. on 11 September 2005.

 

V.SABARIMUTHU

1–9- 2005.


56

 

 

THE MOST BEAUTIFUL EMERALD

 

 

 

 

Some newspapers on 12 September, 2005 said that the Left parties had become the villain of the economic reforms. They said that the votaries of economic liberalization were wringing their hand at the inability of the UPA Government to make headway on economic reforms. They lamented that everyone had to pay obeisance to the language of socialism. They added that the economic liberalism had become the poisoned chalice of Indian politics. The remedy, according to them, is that the champions of reforms must leave their elite, English speaking circles and plunge into the rough and tumble arenas of vernacular India to openly challenge the Left’s monopoly on speaking for “the people”. Obviously, the media was indirectly referring this writer.

On 13 September, 2005 militants attacked the people of a village in Jharkhand State, killing 15 people including some members of the village defence committee.

The Prime Minister of India met the President of China on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly. Both the leaders agreed to seek a reasonable solution to the Indo-China boundary question with greater urgency.

The Prime Minister and the President of Pakistan - Gen. Pervez Musharraf- during a meeting decided not to allow terrorism to hinder the peace process.

 

The Prime Minister catalogued the democratic achievements of India at the United Nations Democracy Fund at New York on 14 September, 2005. He said, “The democracy alone would ensure that the dispossessed and the voiceless of the world would become stakeholders. The end of colonial rule would mean very little unless the broad masses of the people of India were empowered with democracy. Democracy in essence consists in the accountability of those in authority to the ordinary citizens of the country. Democracy also consists in a strong and independent judiciary, a free press and an independent electoral mechanism. Poverty, illiteracy and socio-economic backwardness do not hinder the exercise of democracy. Quite contrarily, our experience of more than 50 years of democratic rule demonstrates how democracy is a most powerful tool to successfully overcome the challenge of development”.

While the Prime Minister was talking like this in the UN, the chairman of the public sector Union Bank of India said that his bank would come out with a public issue immediately following the usual way. Similarly, a Union Minister said that the Government would exit from the Maruti Udyog Ltd (MUL) by disposing of the 10.28 per cent shares, as soon as selling 8 per cent of the shares. At present,the Government has 18.28 holding in the MUL. Further, bids were received to privatize the profit making Delhi and Mumbai airports. It must be noted that neither did the Prime Minister talk anything in support of privatization nor did he explain the virtues of the so-called reform at the UN. In contrast, his words in favour of democracy were sharper than the words present in the email dated 11-9-2005. Thus, what happened in India during his stay abroad is diametrically opposed to what he talked at the UN.

In this connection, it must be stated that there is no necessity to sell the shares of the MUL at all partly because the MUL would lose its all India Character and partly because the Service Charges and the Transaction Tax would bring in great income to the Nation. If 0.1% Transactions Tax were collected for all kinds of transactions, the banks and the Government would get a huge amount which the banks themselves would find it difficult to hold. In such a scenario, the mysterious force would come out with various plans to usurp or divide among them this amount. Therefore, the regulatory mechanism must be strengthened. Instead, the mysterious force is motivating the banks to come out with public issues!

A garlic importer of Chennai in petition in the High Court, Madras said that the import of garlic from China was prohibited in view of infestation of a fungus although the import of the same garlic through Mumbai and Culcutta ports was not banned. The verdict was not published.

A special task force of the Indian Institute of Technology ( IIT ) Chennai has found: “1. There is a strong correlation between the marks of class X, XII and the Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA) during the B.Tech. The correction factor is close to 1.This means, the chances of a good student in school doing well in the B.Tech in the IITs is almost 100%. 2.There is little correlation between marks in Class X, Class XII and the All India Rank (AIR) based on the IIT-JEE. That is, good performers in school are not likely to get good AIR in the present selection system. 3.There is no correlation between the AIR and the CGPA. This means, toppers in the JEE are not at the top during the B.Tech. programme in the IITs.”

The finding of the above task force, presumably appointed in response to the letters of this writer, conclusively and scientifically proves that the present selection system is not only an unconstitutional one but also an evil one. This is a great victory for the consistent views of this writer in this matter.

The President of India very often meets the students with this knowledge. The students also anxiously wait for an opportunity to meet the President to know something new. Naturally, they are all in smiles when they meet the President. Some are much exited. They trust the President.  “They’ve forgotten how to rely on their own instincts” because they fondly believe that the President led them to realize their destiny. Seldom have they realized that the system is a monster that slaughters not only one or two noted children among them but everyone in one go every year in the name of an evil examination called Joint Entrance Examination (JEE). Now, the system procrastinates just to slaughter them in the coming examination.  

The Constitution of India limits the powers of the IIT council. One would say that certain specific provisions make the IIT council an autonomous one. This would stand only as long as the intelligentsia representing the toppers in various States get due representation in the IITs and others. Therefore, whether the IIT-JEE, NIT and other examinations test the knowledge of the students or their intelligence or both is not important. What is important is that each State must get a definite number of seats in the IITs, NITs and others based on the board examination and the entrance examination so that the backdoor entry of a class of opulent students is effectively curtailed and the intelligence duly rewarded. A separate quota for every State would compensate- for the present- the absence of common syllabus and common reference books. The seats allotted to one State could alternate with the seats of other States so that the students with fewer marks in one State would not be deprived of a better branch. It is a scientific solution to this great problem. The IIT council might be reluctant to allot separate quota for every State. For this, the Government of India will have to come out with a notification. The views of the Members of Parliament and the people would be in conformity with this.

However, the mysterious force that governs India is so powerful that it would simply ignore it. This force is  resisting social or economic change in India. Though the Prime Minister is articulating the virtues of social justice and democracy, this force is effectively denying the same. This force stands in the path of every student in India. Therefore, it is the Divine Duty of the President of India to direct the Government against the evil so that the system does not distinguish between student and student in the name of the JEE or through other examinations. The President of India could meet the ignorant and innocent unsuspecting students after insulating them from this evil.  For this, the President of India, consistent with the Preamble of the Constitution of India, could make it easier for things to happen so that the system adopts a right, just and scientific method of selection. In fact, a scientist as President could put in place a scientific model of selection. This would enable the students of all States to realize their destinies. This would be a great help to the students. This would also be a great source of satisfaction to the President, although the people may not realize that the President has done it. However, the provider very often gains more than the recipient.

A Member of Parliament on17 September, 2005 said that a notorious syndicate comprising the LIC, Public Sector Banks, mutual funds and manipulators was responsible for the sudden increase in the index to 8400 points. He disclosed that the diamond branch of the State Bank of India in Mumbai had advanced Re. 435 crore recently into the stock market. He demanded a through probe to find the real culprits behind the recent boom in the stock market. Thus the nationalized banks, LIC and the PSUs deny the existence of even a civil society in India. What would the people do?

Now, there were reports that Russia denied visa to two big Indian industrialists although they wanted to have a business meeting at St. Petersburg. The veracity of the report is not known.

On the next day, ie on 19 September, 2005 the newspapers reported that the intelligence agency of the erstwhile Union of Soviet Socialist Republic (USSR), KGB, bribed a former Prime Minister of India and the Communist Party of India (CPI) in various ways for various purposes. The report was based on the recently published book, The Mitrokhin Archive Volume II-the KGB and the World. The date of publication of the book was not given. The Congress and the CPI parties described the news as an attempt to malign a Congress leader and the CPI. 

A woman human rights activist on 18 September, 2005 charged the President of Pakistan, Gen. Pervez Musharraf that he had retracted from his earlier reply to the reporter of the American daily that women exploited rape to get visas. To this Gen. Musharraf said, “Lady, you are used to people who tell lies. I am not one of them. I am disappointed with people like you. You work with people who looted and plundered the nation. You are against national interest; you have your own agenda. I know that there are people with vested interests and financial interests who are against Pakistan. I never said that. I am not so silly or stupid to make such remarks”.

In the meantime a newspaper quoted that the words of Nobel laureate, Mr. Naipaul, that contemporary India lacks thinkers.

A Union Minister on 19 September, 2005 requested the Chief Ministers to intensify the police action while accelerating the socio-economic development of the affected region.

The police in Andra Pradesh killed four Militant people on 22 September 2005.

India on 24 September, 2005 voted against Iran in the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) governing board. The IAEA board had decided to report Iran to the Security Council. India claimed that it was responsible for the diluted resolution that set no time table. Iran immediately retaliated by cancelling five million tonne a year India-Iran Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) deal with deliveries scheduled to begin in 2009 for a 25-year period.

The militants killed eight villagers including children in Tripura on 25 September. The public sector TV reported it. All other media brigands simply ignored it.

Due to object poverty, five members of a family in Kerala committed suicide on 26 September, 2005.

Now, Mr. Junichiro Koizumi, the prime Minister of Japan, returned to power with a huge mandate to privatize the Postal Services. In fact, the Liberal Democratic Party led by him and its coalition partner, the New Komeito Party got two-third plus majority in the Lower Chamber. Obviously, the leadership of Mr. Koizumi captivated the people of Japan. It must be noted that he even threw away his coat in the name of austerity for the prosperity of Japan. The letter sent to him ended in vain, as the postal privatization appeared imminent.

 This writer felt that the above privatization would be more devastating than the two atom bombs dropped in Japan. Construing the mandate of the people as a mandate to act in bad faith appeared as a preposterous one. A misconceived common good should not have been the dominant issue during an election. However, it is not easy to stop a Government when it pursues something based on the mandate of the people because the prestige is very great. Further, it is not the business of a man in India to tell what the Government of Japan must do. Even if one could do, such things do not ordinarily happen. Furthermore, it would be meaningless to construct things based on one or two bits of information. Yet, it is said that a miner looking for an emerald had examined hundreds of thousands of stones for five years and just when he was about to give it all up, a stone rolled up to his foot that happened to be “the most beautiful emerald” in the world. Thus, not withstanding the opposition from the family and the indirect ridicule from some others, the following letter was sent to the Emperor of Japan.

  

From

V.SABARIMUTHU

Thattankonam,Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. 629167 Email: sabarimuthu@rediffmail.com

INDIA

 

To

His Highness Akihito

Emperor of Japan, Imperial Palace

Tokyo

Your Highness

            52 letters addressed to His Excellency the President of India and the facts that generated these letters are sent in this CD under the title “How Everything Happened in India!” The letters and the facts would show how 1000 million people in India are reduced to mere slaves.

            It is said that an action, which would be moral and constitutional for an Indian, would be immoral and unconstitutional for Japanese and vice versa. However, the impending postal privatization in Japan would do irreparable damage not only to the people of Japan but also to the entire mankind. This is mainly because the privatization would lead to giant manipulations. Therefore, it is the Divine Duty of the Emperor of Japan to halt the postal privatization. If, however, the Emperor of Japan cannot liberate his powers for the social good of mankind, How Everything Happened in India could be transmitted to the leader of the opposition in Japan and the people at large for their perusal. Then, Japan would take a balanced decision.

            One would say that the present Prime Minister keeps the mandate of the people of Japan for postal privatization and as such the Emperor has no role. The Prime Minister may be pursuing his goal because of his belief that the postal privatization would bring unprecedented plenty and prosperity to Japan. However, the habit of conducting huge plebiscites and recording overwhelmingly favourable votes with the help of the media brigands is not new to history. The habit of expressing faith in a regime by indulging in a nauseating worship of the leader is also not new to history. Therefore, the Government of Japan shall not use the mandate against human rights and against the best interests of the people of Japan. The private parties running parallel postal service is a different matter.

It is said that the darkest hour of the night came just before the dawn. This hour might be the darkest hour. However, it is always the Divine Duty of the Presidents/Kings/Emperors to direct their Governments against evil.

            In this connection, one would think that the demands of this writer are for personal glory. Had the Prime Minister of Japan abandoned postal privatization based on the letter sent to him, the question of sending this letter would not have occurred in the mind of this writer at all. Further, the future might remember the action of the leaders rather than these letters.

                                                Thanking your Highness

 

Vellicode                                                                                              Yours faithfully

27- 9 -2005.

 

                                                                                                       (V.SABARIMUTHU).

 

The above letter might have reached the hands of the Emperor of Japan because there is no reason to doubt the postal service of India or Japan. However, no signal came out from Japan for several days. To the total surprise of this writer, the Japanese Parliament called Diet on 14 October, 2005 decided to split the Postal Services in Japan into four Corporations and then start their privatization work from 1 October, 2007 onwards!

In this connection, it must be noted that the decision to split the Postal Services in Japan is fully consistent with the letters sent to His Excellency the President of India. This could be emulated in India as well. The decision to start privatization from October 2007 onwards is also in conformity with the demand of this writer. It is true that the Emperor of Japan has not acknowledged the letter. If there were anyone in this world to acknowledge this, the writer would think that he got the most beautiful emerald in the world! However, people will not easily believe it.

Now, anyone would assume that the impetus for the postal privatization in Japan has receded for good. In fact, the Postal Services remain with the Government of Japan till date.

In India, the former Prime Minister of India on 27 December, 2005 simply deferred the privatization of the BPCL and the HPCL. It was sufficient to save them. Similarly he succeeded in saving the SCI and many other PSUs simply by postponing the implementation of various decisions. This is how the leaders take decisions i.e. they give only political solutions.

On the other hand, if the letter had not reached the hands of the Emperor of Japan, the posterity might tell that a man from India dropped a letter, in vain, to the Emperor of Japan, fearing giant financial manipulations. The developments in the latter half of 2008 vindicated the stand of this writer.

Coming back, a four-member family committed suicide due to financial reasons at New Delhi on 27 September, 2005. In fact, thousands of people all over India commit suicide mainly due to heavy debts and unemployment.

The Prime Minister on 27 September, 2005 talked about the virtues of social justice. On the next day, the Prime Minister said that the benefit of technical education must reach the poor people. At the same time, a Union Minister refused to retract from airport privatization. It must be noted that the ONGC and a NRI Company formed a joint venture to buy oil and gas fields. It had been described as a new predicament. Now, the Government has received bids for developing the Delhi and Mumbai airports through joint venture circumventing the Constitution of India.

On the same day, the Congress party officially declared that the Government of Orissa went by the quantum of investment rather than in the interest of the State and the country in the matter of allowing a Korean Company to extract iron.

The media brigands were exasperated by this development. They thought that their meticulous plan to acquire assets in Korea by exchanging the mineral wealth of India failed in this way. Therefore, they said that they could not envisage a scenario where the Opposition too could be brought under the sway of the Congress party. They described the predicament as simply unthinkable. They directed the Congress leaders to confine their correspondence to the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO). The later events proved that the Congress party said everything only to ridicule the people, as it silently gave in to their pressure.   

A Congress leader on 7 October, 2005 wanted the Congress Chief Ministers to give everyone a chance to be heard. The Congress leader said this after inaugurating the two-day Conference of the Congress Chief Ministers at Chandigarh. All the 14 Congress Chief Ministers attended the Conference. The media brigands did not publish the deliberations of the meeting. They blacked out the words of all Chief Ministers. However, a newspaper on 11 October, 2005 disclosed that the sympathy of the Chief Minister of Andra Pradesh, towards the militants backfired. Any one could infer that the dominant theme of discussion was the letters of this writer. Naturally, the media brigands blacked out the words of all Chief Ministers.

A Member of Parliament on the same day resigned from Parliament protesting against police firing in Meghalaya in which 9 students were killed.

A land mine blast killed at least 12 policemen in the Chatra district of Jharkhand on 8 October, 2005.

On 8 October, 2005 a Non-Resident Indian (NRI) Company and the Government of Jharkhand signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) for setting up a mining and steel making facility and for improving the technical skills and education facility in the State. Mining and steel making companies are always good for any State. It is also good to improve the technical skill of the students.

In this connection, it must be noted that as soon as India became independent, India could start a number of mining and steel facilities under public sector. At that time, India had no expertise in this field and there was dearth of funds also. Now, both are present in plenty. However, the Government is not starting any new steel companies. People all over India are at a loss to understand the reason for it. Therefore, the Government of Jharkhand must tell to the people of India the genuine reasons for giving the mining sites to others. As in the case of Korean Company, it could give answers for the following simple questions. Did the Government of Jharkhand approach the Steel Authority of India (SAIL) for this mining work? If so what was its answer? Is their any dearth of funds in India or in Jharkhand? Will the NRI come out with public issues and extract money form all over India? If so, should the people all over India pay tribute to the NRI? Will it not add to the misery and militancy? The Union Government also must tell whether the deal would be a cause for militancy or not.

Now anyone could see that there is a marked tendency to preserve public funds for private use. The Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) with all their autonomy have to seek and wait endlessly even for investments inside India. The PSUs are not being allowed to use even their surplus money. Many PSUs, including the SAIL, are being incapacitated. The money rotting in the banks also is not used. If used, any profit accruing to the PSUs would go to the people all over India. However, the President of India alone knows the real answer to all these questions. The President of India alone knows whether it is better to hand over the mineral wealth to foreigners, NRIs or to the PSUs. As any decision taken in private interest would be unconstitutional, the final word must come from the President of India.

The enthusiasm of the Indian and foreign private companies to invest in India must be discerned. Many companies- NOT ALL- do not intend to invest their own hard earned money in India. They want to remove the public money in the banks not through normal baking operations but by offering their shares. That is why a private company had been given Re.5000 core in one go not as loan but in the name of buying its shares. It is the reason why the President must discharge his DIVINE DUTY, consistent with the Constitution of India. This is to spare the people from large-scale manipulations by directing the mind of the system to use public money for public investments.

A powerful 7.6 magnitude earthquake near the Pakistan - India border on 8 October, 2005 killed about 30,000 people. The Pak occupied Kashmir was the worst hit.  The Prime Minister of India immediately offered all assistance to Pakistan including helicopters; doctors, medicine, tents and other badly needed materials. Though Pakistan did not accept doctors and helicopters,  train loads of relief materials were sent. In the Indian side about 800 people including 80 soldiers were killed. When the people and the army were engaged in search and rescue operation, militants slaughtered eleven people from two families in Jammu and Kashmir State. The militants still remain as ruthless monsters to slaughter innocent people even during calamities.

The 16th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC) on 12 October, 2005 decided to move from the blind pursuit of gross domestic product (GDP) to a focus on prosperity for all the people. The Committee decided to invest more on the rural areas for rural development based on a “New Scientific Socialist Countryside Concept”. This is consistent with the letter sent to the President of China. Whether China decided to have a small tilt in its policy based on the letter or not is not known to this writer at all.

The New Indian Express on12 September, 2005 reported that a Chief of a NRI Company called on CPI-M leaders at New Delhi. According to the report, he explained to the CPI leaders what all he was doing in India, particularly the proposed steel plant at Jharkhand and his deal with the public sector ONGC. He explained his operations in China also. A few hours later, Mr. Lord Swaraj Paul, led an all party British delegation of MPs to the AKG Bhavan to meet the other Left leaders..

The public sector Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) and British Petroleum (BP) on 13 October, 2005 signed a letter of intent to form a 50:50 joint - venture to construct a $3 billion refinery in Punjab. In this connection, it must be noted that when Maruti Udyog Limited (MUL) was started, the Union Government had majority shares. Later, in the name of a policy, the Government handed over it to the Japanese promoter. Now, joint ventures are becoming the order of the day. The people are forced to live with it. They are made to believe that things are not in their hands. The crucial question is whether the joint ventures would remain as such or they would go in the hands of the private parties. Any one would tell with certainty that these joint ventures would ultimately become private assets. In this case, even the distribution of petroleum products would be cornered by the private parties, a privilege not so far enjoyed by the State Governments.

The root cause for the present predicament is that a few boys could buy the Supreme Court. They could then assume to themselves the power to grant petroleum outlets. As they could not corner all PSUs mainly due to the letters of this writer, they have, apparently, devised a well thought out plan to corner the PSUs and their assets through such joint ventures. When the foreign companies are offered such joint ventures and mining sites, the Indian companies would get foreign assets and companies in equal proportion. Thus the moment this deal materializes, some properties in England might be purchased by the Indian stakes. Alternatively, some Indian companies and the PSUs would very soon come out with such joint ventures. This is the observation of the people who are away from the scene of action. The truth could be different only if the HPCL and the other oil PSUs were not in a position to start this project on their own. His Excellency the President of India might reject this as a simple thing. However, Paulo Coelho says that “it’s the simple things in life that are most extraordinary; only wise men are able to understand them”.

The people see two ways for development. One way is to promote private initiatives harnessing private money. This policy would allow private parties to purchase assets in India and abroad using private money. This policy allows the PSUs also to buy assets abroad. The assets of the PSUs would remain as the assets of Indians. Naturally, the Government would remain as the entrepreneur of the entrepreneurs. Further, this policy debars the Government from advancing public money to buy shares of any company.  

Another way for development is to hand over public money, assets and the foreign exchange to private parties in the name of buying and selling shares, joint ventures, subsidies, big contracts and tenders, effecting bulk buying and selling and through other unconstitutional adjustments of interests.

The directors of the private sector ICICI bank decided on 13 October, 2005 to raise Re.7000 crore from domestic and overseas markets.

In the meantime, the Public Investment Board decided to buy 68 passenger aircraft from the USA manufacturer, Boeing for $ 8 billion.

An Indian Company signed an agreement to buy Good Earth Corporation and FMALI Herb Inc of the USA.

A Congress leader on 16 October, 2005 exhorted the party men to consider themselves as the workers of the people. 

Security forces killed four militants on 16 October, 2005.

A Union Minister, on 16 October 2005 said the NDA Government failed to spend Re. 24,000 crore for the modernization of the armed forces particularly procurement of aircraft. This strengthens the hypothesis of this writer that the former Prime Minister and the Home Minister advanced the election to escape from manipulators and commission agents. 

The Sunday edition of The New Indian Express on 16 October, 2005 quoted the following from Nathaniel Hawthome in “ Words –so innocent and powerless as they are, as standing in a dictionary, how potent for good and evil they become in the hands of one who knows how to combine them.”                 

A newspaper on 17 October, 2005 said that the Government threatened at every step by the Left parties would be a paralyzed Government undermining economic growth. It advised the Government and the Congress party not to bow before the General Secretary of the CPI-M. It asked the Congress to fight for the policies it holds important, risking an election if necessary. The editorial said the Congress would emerge stronger after the election. The apparent message was that the media brigands would see that the Congress wins the election. This shows that it is the media brigands and not the people who make or mar a Government in India.

The High Court, Mumbai, after hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition set aside the recent sale of the four National Textile Corporation (NTC) mills at Mumbai. The High Court held that that the NTC did not adhere to the scheme under the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) but behaved like a private mill owner. The judgement is consistent with the facts presented by this writer. Anyone could discern that the High Court, Mumbai,  has undergone a metamorphosis. However, what happened later is not known to anyone.

Militants on 18 October, 2005 killed a Minister in the Government of Jammu & Kashmir State and four others in two separate incidents. When the Government of Jammu & Kashmir was paying its attention to give relief to the earth- quake victims, the militants were knocking down prominent people.

The Transparency International placed India 88th among 159 nations. The USA and the UK stood at 17th and 11th positions respectively. The people all over India believe that India would come above the UK, the moment the Prime Minister and the top five or six Union Ministers allow the State Governments to buy and sell things and run the PSUs.

Some newspapers on 18 October, 2005 directed the Union Government not to appoint politicians as independent directors to the boards of the PSU banks. The media brigands were upset over this new policy presumably because they will have to seek the nod from one more political leader to remove money from the banks.

The newspapers on 19 October, 2005 reported the decision of a private company to enter the life insurance and pension market in the UK after taking over some private companies of the UK.

It is disquieting to note that the Union Government is now making many crucial economic moves secretly. Thus, none knows the fate of the bids received for the privatization of Delhi and Mumbai airports. Due to this and other developments, the facts from 11 September 2005 to 19 September 2005 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India on 20 October, 2005 through email.

 

V.SABARIMUTHU


57

 

THE RIGHT OF MIGHT

 

 

         

On 21 October, 2005 the President of India wanted the directors, actors and other artists to introspect in what way they wanted the posterity to remember them.

The spokesman of the Congress party said any decision on privatization would be taken only after considering all matters

The former Prime Minister of India said that the BJP must be open to new ideas and that it should not consider its ideology as the ultimate truth.

The General Secretary of the CPM-M on 22 October, 2005 advised the Union Government to sell the shares of the small Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) to raise resources. It is clear that the Left parties –more than any other political party-wanted to hand over the PSUs to the manipulators.

On the same day, a Union Minister, however, said that the Government had no plan to divest public sector units.

Again on the same day, an Indian company bought Australian banking software firm for $26 million.

In the meantime, though it is a digression, the Supreme Court of Chile stripped the former Chilean dictator, Mr. Augusto Pinochet, of immunity from prosecution for corruption charges related to his multimillion-dollar bank accounts overseas. Similarly, Mr. Mikhail Khodorkovsky, founder of the Yukos oil giant and once Russia’s wealthiest man, was sent to a prison in Siberia to serve the rest of his eight-year sentence for financial crimes.

Coming back, a Union Minister said that China would raise $270 billion by making mostly state-held stocks publicly trade-able. The objective was to increase private ownership of companies. Another objective of China, he said, was to plug pension fund shortfall. He said that India too was suffering from pension fund shortfall. He exhorted the people in India to save in financial instruments.

A former Prime Minister of India, wanted the Chief Minister of Karnataka State to tell the contribution of an Information Tecnology Company and questioned the legality of allotting 845 acre land in the “green belt” of Bangalore and another 300 acre near Bangalore International Airport.

A newspaper immediately clubbed the above issue with other industrialists. It said that the big private companies need not call on anyone in Delhi for anything. It said that the new India loved and cherished the entrepreneurs more than the politicians.

The above former Prime Minister whined that the land allotments were beyond the requirements of the private company. He said that the private company wanted to use the land for commercial purposes like building a five-star hotel. He disclosed that other major companies were showing higher turn over from rented buildings.

A newspaper on  23 October, 2005 preferred a particular officer as the new Director of the CBI. The media brigands must have their own plan in this matter.

An eleven-member People’s Consultative Group (PCG) of the United Liberation Front of Assam met the Prime Minister on 27 October, 2005. The Prime Minister told them that he was the “servant of the Constitution” and expressed his willingness to sort out all issues within its framework. After the meeting, a member of the PCG team claimed that the Government was willing to discuss all issues, including that of sovereignty. He described the talks as “congenial, open minded and heart-to- heart.

On 28 October, 2005, Vodafone, the world’s largest mobile service provider with a presence in 30 nations acquired 10% stake in India’s biggest mobile operator, Bharti Tele –Ventures Limited (BTVL) for $1.5 billion (Re.6700 crore). It is pertinent to note that the Union Government sold the VSNL, which had been making a huge profit of about Re.1000 crore every year just for about Re. 1000 crore.

 On 29 October 2005, the Prime Minister, after laying the foundation stone of a Re.5400 crore -750 MW gas based power project  at Agartala, urged the North-Eastern States to establish business ties with neighbouring countries as the region would become a gateway to South-East Asia. He further said that the focus of his Government was on economic development and also political and social empowerment of the people. Obviously, the words of the Prime Minister were fully consistent with the letters of this writer. If the Prime Minister believed in his own words, the PSUs would be split or shared equitably. Similarly, all public sector financial institutions would be brought under the States for the social and political empowerment of people.

Three consecutive blasts killed 62 people in New Delhi on 29 October 2005.

On 30 October, 2005 the media brigands reported that the Independent Inquiry Committee (IIC) appointed by the UN to investigate the Food –for- Oil Programme of Iraq found that Iraq paid huge bribes for lobbying. Iraq also received kickbacks from several companies.  According to the report, out of 3614 companies 2253 companies paid kickbacks. The report said that a leader in the Congress party and an Indian private company had been a “non-contractual beneficiary”.  The IIC consisted of Mr. Paul Volcker, the former US Federal Reserve Chairman, and two other experts. The first interim report came out on February 2, 2005, the second one on March 29, 2005 and the final report on 27 October, 2005. The media brigands did not disclose the interim reports as and when they were released.

A Supreme Court Bench headed by the Chief Justice on 30 October, 2005 asked an Indian private company to go ahead with its Re. 15,400-crore mega steel plant project at Dubri in Jaipur district of Orissa on its own risk at a disputed site subject to the outcome of another petition before it. The media brigands including the public sector TV channel did not report the names of the judges in the Bench. On the next day, the Chief Justice retired from service. However, on the eve of his retirement, the Chief Justice said that he was upset by comments from all around that the Supreme Court was anti-poor, anti-poverty and anti-down trodden in its judgements. He said that he was not against criticism. However, he said that he was hurt by the criticism of the Supreme Court as an institution.

In this connection, it must be admitted that there could be nothing more painful than the lack of trust of people in the Supreme Court. Why do the people all around feel that the judgements are being delivered or withheld to suit the needs of the strong?

Immediately after the “BALCO judgement” the learned judges of many High Courts openly said that the BALCO judgement stood in the way of delivering just judgements. The obvious message was that the BALCO judgement had an immoral influence on the judiciary. Therefore, the Supreme Court should have dispelled the apprehensions of the learned judges immediately. Instead, the Supreme Court ignored it. The indolence of the Supreme Court disturbed the people. The “petrol pump case” drove the people to think that vanity had become the key-note character of the Supreme Court. Naturally, the people began to feel that the Supreme Court was treating the common people with haughty contempt.

 Some learned judges are the embodiment of justice. When two lakh employees were dismissed from service, the Supreme Court did approach the matter objectively. Though the timely intervention could have been due to the alertness of the President of India, many employees looked upon the Supreme Court with love and respect. But, people all over India, as a rule, look upon the Supreme Court with fear and suspicion. Some learned judges acknowledge the people even as their masters. But all right thinking people believe that many learned judges write judgements in crucial cases as if there were no people apart from them. 

Now, the people think that a wicked cause must be at the bottom of the present judgement also. In fact, the judgement would contribute to militancy. As the Court did not explore the reason for not giving this work to the Steel Authority of India Ltd (SAIL), anyone would tell that the Chief Justice heard the case in private interest. The suspicion deepens because the media brigands did not publish the arguments or other relevant facts of the case to make it a public matter. No wonder that some people would ascribe the judgement to the lure of the lucre. Therefore, the Chief Justice need not have heard the case so as to deliver the judgement on the penultimate day of his retirement.

It is important to note that the learned judges in India cannot be independent because the Constitution of India binds them. All judgements must be consistent with the Constitution of India. But the Supreme Court does not acknowledge any other higher principles than its orders. This would pave the way for further favours. The strong would continue to purchase more and more favours at the cost of the Constitution of India. This is the reason why all right thinking people refuse to trust the Supreme Court. However, the Government and a few people still pay the Supreme Court the homage due to it presumably because they think that it is safer to them. The views of the Members of Parliament and the people at large cannot be different from this.

There are certain “desirable essentials” in Governments also. It may not be possible for any Government to possess all of them. But, all Governments must have at least one “good or noble” quality - the quality of acting in “good faith”. Anyone would tell that the word “SOCIALISM” present in the Preamble forbids the Governments from entrusting the mineral wealth of India in the hands of one or two private individuals. Therefore, the Government of Orissa should have approached the SAIL to undertake this work.  It has not done so. Therefore, anyone would tell that the Government of Orissa acted in “bad faith”.

Why should the people all over India bother about it?

This is because the private company would extract money from all over India and it would affect the day-to-day life of people all over India. Further, the ores belong to all people.

Is there any way to escape from this predicament?

The Government, the President and the Chief Justice could undo the harm done to the Constitution. For this the new Chief Justice of India could constitute a suitable Bench- after conducting an Orientation Course to all learned judges- to annul all unconstitutional and immoral judgements. He could thereby restore all illegally privatized PSUs. The sanctions imposed against 52 letters also could be lifted. The people could be allowed to know the news and views. However, it was the present Chief Justice who heard the petrol pump case. As might became right in his hands, present Chief Justice would frustrate by the right of might all attempts of the President to restore order in India. What would the people do?

Now, the people suspect a deeper threat to their loved liberties. It is a human rights issue. The Human Rights Commission could look into this matter.

In view of the new developments, the facts from 20- 10- 2005 to 2 - 11- 2005 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India on 3 November, 2005 through email.

 

V.SABARIMUTHU


58

 

SILVER LINING

 

 

        In the meantime, a political leader from Jammu and Kashmir openly acknowledged that he was offered 7 million barrels of oil equivalent to Re. 41 crore but had turned it down He disclosed that he saw the name of a Congress leader in the website in the previous year when he was searching for his own name.

There were reports that the Congress party and 125 Indian companies were listed in the Volcker Committee report. Therefore, the Congress party said that it would send a comprehensive legal notice to the UN and the Volcker Committee. However, Mr. Paul Volcker said that the report was based on the Iraqi records.

  In this connection, it must be said that Mr. Paul Volker has handsomely contributed his share for the emancipation of 1000 million people. If the unknown political leader from Jammu and Kashmir State had obtained Re.hundreds of crore, the possibilities for the amount of commission in various deals could be gauged. Now, anyone would agree that the developments are just as this writer had conjectured.

In the meantime, Dr.Jan Peter Balkenende, the Hon’ble Prime Minister of The Netherlands acknowledged the receipt of the letter of this writer with a covering letter. The Prime Minister himself signed the letter. It is given below.

“I would like to thank you for sharing your views

Yours sincerely,

Prime Minister of the Kingdom of the Netherlands,

Sd/-

Dr.Jan Peter Balkendende

 

Dear Mr. Sabarimuthu,

Herewith I acknowledge the receipt of your CD and your covering letter, both of which arrived safely. In your letter you express your concern for the situation of many people in India. I have taken good notice of your letter and I appreciate your concern for your fellowman. I would like to ask your attention to the following.

The traditional objective of Dutch foreign policy are maintaining good relations between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and other countries, protecting the country against outside threats and promoting a just world where peace, security, welfare and human dignity are guaranteed. The Netherlands seeks to help strengthen the international legal order, with a specific focus on human rights policy. As the minister of Foreign Affairs, Dr. B.R.Bot, is the minister responsible for Dutch foreign policy, you could consider bringing your concern to his attention. The contact details are as follows.”

The above letter might also contribute its share for the emancipation of 1000 million people.            

            A newspaper said that some people were opposing the extraction of iron ore by a Korean Company in Orissa although the State had been exporting 15 million tonne of iron ore every year. The paper simultaneously said that Orissa has a reserve of 5,428 million tonne of iron ore. The meaning is that no harm would befall on the nation if 15 million tonne more ore were exported.

The media brigands on 6 November, 2005 screamed that a Congress leader had written a letter to Mr. Saddam Husain, the then President of Iraq,  on the controversial oil –for food vouchers. Many such allegations were leveled against the Congress leader in a concerted way through different newspapers and individuals although all news and views, apparently, emanated from the same source.          

The Enforcement Directorate and the Income Tax Department conducted searches at the office of the son of a political leader in connection with the Volker Committee report.

With regard to the Volcker Committee report, the following points must be noted.

            1. The present system would corrupt any one. Therefore, a new system that prevents corruption rather than catching anyone red-handed is needed. This writer genuinely wanted to save all political leaders from corruption and destabilization. Thus, the first point of the first letter of this writer to His Excellency President of India was to abolish the policy of bulk buying. Anyone would tell that India would be far more beautiful, if there were 29 petroleum ministers for 29 different States to vie with one another to buy and sell petroleum products. Now, the Union Minister for Petroleum gets all favours as for as he is concerned and effectively shuts out the possibilities of rivals in the run for the very same favours and honours.

 2. The Union Government could disperse, say, Re.500 crore to Re.1000 crore to the political parties for the Parliamentary Election. The leaders in the BJP and other parties talk about the question of State funding of elections intermittently although nothing materializes.

3. The Volcker Committee report must remain as an eye opener to everyone. The media brigands could have published the report. They could have demanded an inquiry but without shutting the door on the 52 letters. Therefore, it is the duty of the President of India, political leaders and the Members of Parliament “to frustrate the plots and conspiracies of the most unscrupulous crowd that ever strives to blacken the pages of a country’s history”.

The media brigands stopped talking about this matter after a few days presumably because they got what they wanted.

            On 7 November, 2005 an Indian company bought a Chilean Business Process Outsourcing company (BPO) for $2.3 million.

            India sent 27 trucks of relief materials to Pak Occupied Kashmir (POK) on November 7, 2005. Pakistan sent one truck of relief materials to Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) State. India, then offered $ 25 million to Pakistan to buy goods from India.

            The State Bank of India (SBI) bought 76% shares of a bank in Indonesia along with management control. Earlier the SBI had bought a bank in Kenya.

            The Prime Minister on 8 November, 2005 reiterated the virtues of open societies and open economies. He said that a nation would be truly empowered only by the brainpower of its people. He could talk like this because this work remains concealed.

            A newspaper on 9 November, 2005 reported that an Indian private company was all set to invest US$ 2.5 to 3 billion in Bangladesh.

            A former Union Minister, connected with the sale of the public sector BALCO, in the meantime, defended the judiciary.

            In this connection, it must be stated that none in India so far used strong words against the judges. Yet, the former Union Minister is disturbed even by the ordinary words used to describe the character of the Supreme Court. When the BALCO was privatized all right thinking people believed that this former minister had been keeping the BALCO judgement in his pocket long before the Supreme Court heard it. Naturally, he is coming to the rescue of the learned judges now.       

The President of India, presumably keeping in mind the July 24, judgement of the High Court, Madras and some other judgements, said that the judiciary should not cause embarrassment and even injustice to the democratic system and the rights of its citizens by intruding into the territory of the executive, as the dividing line is slim, even vague.    

Everyone knows that the economic policy of the Government cannot be against the Constitution of India. One would say that the Government has the right to buy and sell. It could sell its PSUs not to private individuals but to the public of different States without allowing concentration of shares so that the public sector character would be retained.

 Similarly, Government is forbidden from buying or taking over any private property for public purpose with an eye on alienating the property of one or two individuals. Further, the Supreme Court should not have cancelled the petrol pumps allotted by the Members of Parliament with with the intension of allowing one or two individuals to distribute petrol pumps throughout India.

Furthermore, the act of allowing private individuals to extract mineral wealth of India is an unconstitutional one. Common man has no right to force the Supreme Court to give answer for this. However, if it had anything that could be explained, the Supreme Court should not be an institution to keep it away from the people. The silence of the Supreme Court to 52 letters shows that it is not free to take the people into confidence. If the learned judges of the Supreme Court did not open their eyes to see the demands of the Constitution of India, the common man has to project it to the President through various angles. He could continue to do this until he feels that the system is incorrigible. Therefore, anyone knowing this work would beseech the President to restore order in the Supreme Court by annulling all its unconstitutional orders forthwith.

            A Congress leader on 11 November, 2005 promised to render justice to all sections of the people.

            Now, a newspaper came out with a series of articles by different personalities. The predecessor of the present President of India, on 12 November 2005 considered the assertion of the hitherto suppressed and exploited sections for their rights as a silver lining. He wanted everyone to be mindful of the ordinary people who were facing challenges to safeguard their very survival. The newspaper had obtained this answer a few days before his death.

Former Deputy Prime Minister, in another article emphasized the importance of good governance.

The Speaker of Parliament stressed the importance of decentralization.

 An industrialist said that policies must be framed and strictly implemented for the national good rather than to appease political ideologies.

A Union Minister deplored that the middle class in India were determining the course and outcome of governance. He said that the poor and utterly deprived of the nation – the “dumb millions”- must be empowered. However, he said that he was opposed to “decentralization of corruption”. Obviously, the Union Minister wanted the poorest of the poor to rule India presumably through people like himself.

 The Chief of an information technology company said that the philosophy of suspicion before proof must change to proof before verdict. He added that the fortunate elite of the society must take up the responsibility of making a better society for the future generations.

The Chief of Naval Staff said that the money earmarked for buying guns could be diverted to buy butter for children.

Finally, the Chief of another information technology company said that India needed teachers who were role models. He concluded the article by quoting the following from Swami Vivekananda. “If you have assimilated five ideas and made them your life and character, you have more education than any man who has got by heart a whole library” 

            Describing the present time as the testing time of judiciary, the New Chief Justice of High Court, Madras exhorted the learned judges, advocates and the common people to protect the independence of the Judiciary.

            1000-armed militants on 14 November, 2005 stormed a jail in Bihar, killed 9 prisoners and set free 389 prisoners of their own group.

            The newspapers on 14 November, 2005 reported the formation of a joint venture company called “C-Edge Technologies Ltd” between a private company and the public sector State Bank of India (SBI). The private company will have 51% share and the SBI will have 49%. It must be noted that unlike private companies, all Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) are governed by some rules and regulations. Such rules would disappear in joint venture companies. Therefore, it looks like a decision taken in private interest to load the private individual with public funds. Ultimately, the company would go in the hands of private company. Though the President of India is in a better position to judge it, the Government must retract itself from all joint ventures. Apart from the Constitution of India, the recent experiences also demand this. In fact, but for the recent experiences such demands would not have occurred in the mind of the people.

            Two persons were killed and 60 others injured in a militant attack in the J&K State on 15 November, 2005.

            With regard to Volvker Committee report, a Congress leader on 16 November, 2005 said that the committee set up to probe the Volcker Committee report would get to the bottom of the issue and action would be taken against the guilty. But nothing came out till date.

            The Prime Minister put the growth rate of India at 7 to 7.5 per cent during 2005-2006. If some more suggestions of this writer were implemented, India would attain 15 percent growth rate during 2006-2007.

            In the mean time, a Union Minister said that the shares of the profit making PSUs also would be sold. Another Union Minister said that 15% of the shares of the Shipping Corporation of India (SCI) would be sold very soon.

            A CD containing “How Everything Happened in India” was sent to the General Secretary of the CPI-M party and four other Members of Parliament on 19 November, 2005.

            A Minister in the Government of Tamil Nadu said that the Union Government now collected Re.34,000 crore in the previous year from Tamil Nadu State alone as taxes.

            As the system continues to deny the benefits of a Constitution to the people, the facts from 3 November, 2005 to 21 November, 2005 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India on 22-11-2005 through email.

V.SABARIMUTHU


59

 

PRACTICAL WISDOM

 

    

 

          A Supreme Court Bench headed by the Chief Justice on 25 November, 2005 adjourned the “High Court judges appointment case” to December 9 and asked the Union Government to complete the appointments in the interim. In contrast, the Supreme Court did not adjourn the petrol pump case in a similar manner for the benefit of the public. 

A newspaper on 25 November, 2005 said certain things conveying the message that anyone standing against the present establishment would be murdered like Mr. SATENDRA DUBEY and Mr. MANJUNANTHAN SHANMUGAM. The paper disclosed that the contractor mafia killed the former and the oil mafia killed the latter. This is the repercussion of the facts sent to His Excellency the President of India on 22 November, 2005. It is clear that the media mafia is a murderous crowd and they would not hesitate to murder anyone to protect the present establishment.

            There were reports that the LIC would invest Re.3500 crore in this year in the stock market over and above the Re.6500 crore already invested. According to the reports, the profit of the LIC would be Re.4500 crore during 2005-2006. The report said that the profit of the LIC increased by 28% over the previous year due to the increase in the investments. Obviously, the Government is loading the stakes with riches every day in thousands of crore using the money extracted from all over India. Anyone would tell that it is one of the actual reasons for the economic deprivation of Indians.

 

            On 26 November, 2005 the following letter was sent to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, The Netherlands through email.

 

Dear Sir         

            This is in continuation of the letter sent to the Hon’ble Prime Minister of The Netherlands on 22 July 2005.

                When India was in a grave fiscal crisis, this writer sent a letter to the Hon’ble Prime Minister of India mainly to lift India from the crisis and to save the Public Sector Undertakings. These and many other objectives were achieved somewhat satisfactorily though a series of letters. Now, definitely India is a better place to live. However, the letters and the facts lead to the realization that India is not a true democracy. Besides the large-scale financial manipulations, the threat to the liberties, human rights and above all life of individuals like this writer still exists. The fact that the letters still remain concealed confirms this conclusion.

            Incidentally, the letters might remain as an eye opener for many other countries to control financial extractions and to ensure peace and prosperity.

            The letter dated 31 October, 2005 of the Prime Minister of The Netherlands, apparently, shows that the Prime Minister read hundreds of pages. It will have its own effect everywhere. Further, this writer is not a citizen of The Netherlands. Yet, the Prime Minister of The Netherlands, after objectively analyzing everything, has chosen to send a reply through priority post! No other citizen of India would have received a letter of this kind from the Prime Minister of The Netherlands. Whatever others say, this might go down as an achievement.

            It is not easy to send these letters to the heads of all countries. However, the letters sent to some important world leaders had a momentous effect in India. A CD containing everything that happened in India from 1 June 2001 to 3 November 2005 was sent by post on 25 November, 2005. In this message, everything that happened in India from 12 July 2005 to 22 November 2005 is being sent through email for the kind consideration of the Prime Minister of The Netherlands.                             

Thank you     

Yours faithfully,

(V.SABARIMUTHU)

 

            Coming back, the Chief Justice of India on 27 November, 2005 said, “I would like to say with outmost humility that the judiciary in some cases has only emphasized constitutional provisions, the true spirit thereof by highlighting the express as well as implied intention of the Constitution draftsman which for some reason or other remained unimplemented at the hands of the executives…… In judiciary we have no place for diplomacy. In (the) very nature of our duties and functions, someone is bound to be displeased but that is unavoidable……The greatest asset of the judiciary is the confidence of the people. Loss of confidence of the judiciary is the end of law.” The Chief Justice was speaking at the Law Day celebrations organized by the Supreme Court Bar Association. One could construe it as a reply of the Chief Justice of India to the facts sent to His Excellency the President of India on 22-11-2005.

            In this connection, it must be noted that the common man cannot but think of this matter because the statement of the Chief Justice of India is in the context of the Constitution of India and therefore the destiny of 1000 million people. It is well known that the stakes everywhere want to multiply their resources. The stakes in India cannot be an exception to this. However, deviating from the normal route, they wanted to establish their business destroying the Constitution of India with the help of the media mafia; investigation agencies, judiciary and the Government.

 It all began when the then Chief Justice of India depicted the Constitution of India as “SUPREME”. Everyone in India knows that the learned judges of the Supreme Court of India are “virtual lords of the land”. They are “blessed with strength and might to impose their will upon the land”. When the Chief Justice of India described the Constitution of India, as “supreme”, the people perceived that something bad would happen to the Constitution of India. They believed that the word had a deeper meaning than what he had patently meant. Though he loomed like the embodiment of justice, the people thought that gross corruption had entered his soul. “His style and mode of advance was new and perplexing”. The people saw his power to determine the nature of the Bench, as the sharpest weapon in his hand.

 Now the murderous media mafias wanted the Supreme Court to take over the BALCO case from various High Courts. Fearing the mood of the Supreme Court, this writer made a moaning sound. The Supreme Court swiftly took over the cases, constituted a Bench in a minute and the “innocent head of the Constitution of India –the Preamble- rolled in the dust”. Soon the President of India went to the Supreme Court. He was not able to enlighten the enraged Chief Justice or his followers in the Supreme Court. They refused to give the details of the incident to the President as a matter of “economic policy”.

The people were shocked by the incident. “They began to look with apprehension at the cold-blooded act and gave expression to their disapproval. But, the murderous media mafias did not report anything. However, the Chief Justice became slowly conscious of the enormity of the crime and felt strangely perturbed”. Therefore, he threw mud on the judiciary by saying that 20% of the judges were corrupt.

Just at that moment, another party of the murderous media mafias dragged the petrol pump case, -a “strange looking specimen” of the Preamble; Equality- which was struggling for all it was worth into the Supreme Court”. “Uttering a savage shriek of laughter”, media mafias wanted the Supreme Court to cancel the petrol pumps granted by the Members of Parliament to their kith and kin. The Supreme Court knew that the people would welcome canceling the petrol pump. It knew that if it did not ask the Government to frame a better guideline, none would take notice of it. It knew that this simple avoidance would keep a few manipulators in luxury not only till the end of their lives but also for generations. It knew that the avoidance of a simple sentence –a very small sentence- would conquer the entire India. Due to a premonition, this writer very politely pointed out the threatened loss of liberty of the Constitution. But, “balancing on one foot, the Supreme Court did a graceful dive, and its murderous knife passed through the body of the Constitution of India”. Again, the President of India went to the Supreme Court. The simple and humble words of the President of India – the economic policy cannot be against the Constitution of India- failed to penetrate into its intellect because greed had taken possession of its mind. The Supreme Court pretended to be unaware of the gravity of its crime!

“As the eyes of the learned judges fell on the piled-up corpses in a corner of the Supreme Court, they closed their eyes. Being in a slightly chastened mood, the Supreme Court condescended to address the BPCL/HPCL case. The learned judges opened their eyes as if from a dreadful dream, and looked around them with a stare. The whole body of the Constitution of India was covered with rags no better than ribbons, and it was smeared from head to foot with dirt and grime. Its unkempt hair lay in a tangled matted mass over its head and shoulders, giving it an appearance at once frightful and fantastic.

At the sight of the pathetic face of the Constitution, a wave of pity swept through the cruel heart of the Supreme Court, and the learned judges asked the Government to get the nod of the Parliament to dispose them.

            The reaction of the people was strange and unexpected as the judgement came when they lost all hopes of getting an intelligent answer from the Supreme Court.  A ludicrous grin twisted the faces of some people, as if with the memory of some frightful incident. Some burst into song, telling others some dark deeds of blood committed by some people”.

              Immediately, another gang of the murderous media mafias went to the Chief Justice to elicit some information regarding the HPCL/BPCL case. They believed that the Chief Justice would load them with riches very soon, if necessary by doing away with the Constitution of India. The Chief Justice, in fact, wanted to make a day of it. This writer again pointed out the impending danger. Therefore, the former Prime Minister did not allow the Minister for Disinvestments to thrust the Constitution into the Supreme Court. “By some strange luck, neither the media mafias nor the stakes who had accompanied the stupid- looking Constitution that morning were there to identify it, or else the Supreme Court might have fared worse. The Chief Justice finally asked the learned judges not to kill anybody thereafter.

The Chief Justice then fretted that he had no powers and an uneasy lull prevailed for a long time. The media mafias silently dragged the wretched-looking Constitution to a new Chief Justice again. The Chief Justice knew that the case was in his hands. “No escape!” No one was there to enlighten the enraged Chief Justice about earlier incidents, and for that ignorance, the Constitution of India “paid the penalty with its life”. The Chief Justice of India seemed to be satisfied with the penultimate “day’s work”. He was also a little exhausted, and left to his home, accompanied by the stakes.

There was practically no reaction from the people. Owing to the power wielded by the Supreme Court, those who were capable of doing something held their tongue in fear and practical wisdom”.

“The good-for-nothing Constitution is still in the hands of the media mafias. Hundreds of media brigands have surrounded the place. The Constitution cannot escape”.

The present President also went to the Supreme Court, stared at the fallen bodies and returned silently.

 It is said that one must study the past and derive strength from it to fight for the present. The above is what one gets when the works of C.V.Raman Pillai on the medieval History of the Kingdom of Travancore-as translated by B.K.Menon into English- are clubbed with the present.

All people in India will be “displeased” with the recent crucial judgements of Supreme Court. The only condition is that they must get a chance to see the 52 letters and the facts running into over three hundred pages. A few learned judges of the Supreme Court must be aware of the gravity of the crime. The Chief Justice of Rajastan High Court openly said that the rich get justice at the expense of the poor even when the former are on the wrong side of law. But, such words go down without any meaning.  Therefore, the Supreme Court, with all its “humility”, should come forward to annul all unconstitutional and immoral judgements. If these facts were ignored, the people might consider those responsible for such incidents as “fiends in human shape”. Such situations should not occur in India. 

 Alternatively, the Government could restore all privatized PSUs forthwith. If nothing materializes, the President of India could do his duty following the dictates of the Constitution of India. No one need point out right and wrong, good and evil or constitutional and unconstitutional to the President of India is another matter. 

Coming back, the Left parties on 28 November, 2005 requested the Government through a letter not to privatize Mumbai and Delhi airports.  They did it for publicity. This might be related to the CD sent to the general Secretary of the CPI-M on 19-11-2005.

In view of the November 27 statement of the Chief Justice of India, the facts from 22 November, 2005 to 29 November 2005 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India through email on 30-11-2005.

V.SABARIMUTHU


60

 

HUMAN RIGHTS        

 

 

A seven judge Bench of the Supreme Court on 30 November, 2005 declined to review its August 12 judgement that scrapped State quotas and reservation in private, unaided, minority and non minority professional educational institutions across the country. The judgement was a unanimous one.

The reservation is akin to the rent an institution pays to the state. It could be compared to the tax a company or an individual pays to the state. The quotas create conditions essential for an honourable living. However, the views of the learned judges are different. Their views in this matter are simply the logical extension of their views in earlier judgements. Further, in this case also the media mafias did not publish the arguments placed before the Bench. The basis for determining the composition of the Bench was also not revealed.

However, the Union Government this time was very alert to annul the effects of the Judgement. In other words, the Members of Parliament (MPs) stepped in to do the work of the watchdog of the Constitution of India thereby making the Supreme Court of India irrelevant to the present scheme of things. Thus, the Constitution Amendment (104th) Bill to reserve seats for socially and educationally backward classes besides the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in private unaided educational institutions was passed by the Parliament on 21 December, 2005. Many MPs praised a Congress leader for the alertness with which the effect of the judgement was annulled. Though this Amendment would not affect any big stakes in India, the people, in general, heaved a sigh of relief because the Bill was passed almost unanimously in a division with 379 voting in favour and one voting against and one abstaining. Even the BJP supported the Bill although a leader – according to later revelation of the media mafias- abstained from voting as a protest for excluding the minority institutions from the Bill. Evidently, not even two MPs were ready to stand by the learned judges of the Supreme Court. In the Upper House 172 voted in favour; and two against the Bill. This shows that “the good still exists and that there is a way to escape from the present predicament”.

In this connection, it must be noted that the learned judges of the Supreme Court consider themselves superior to other human beings. The people also expect them to be supremely men. Yet, the Members of Parliament were not ready to follow them. The Government would get similar support from the Members of Parliament if it were ready to take back the privatized PSUs to bring the Constitution on its rails, to reserve the seats in the IITs and others or to reserve the shares of the PSUs for various States.

Now, a person, who had been an ambassador to Iraq, disclosed that a close relative of the former Prime Minister of India was also associated with oil vouchers. The media mafias did not -however- report this revelation properly. The foster son-in-law of the former Prime Minister threatened to file a case against the former ambassador. But nothing is coming out now.

Further, some newspapers on 11 December, 2005 reported that two deals of the NDA Government involved Re. 27000 crore (Twenty seven thousand crore). One was the purchase of A.K.47 guns from a Bulgarian company in bulk and the other was the land allotment deal. The latent message was that Re.thousands of crore was lost as commission due to the bulk buying. The commission money might have gone into foreign countries or to the stock market. The part of the commission might have been utilized for buying the PSUs. The CBI and the President do know the veracity of such reports.

The Prime Minister on 8 December, 2005 said that the Government must resist populism and that the art of political management lay in ensuring longevity in office while taking difficult decisions. Presumably keeping in mind the facts sent to His Excellency the President of India on 11 November, 2005 the Prime Minister said that he would not go back on the so-called reforms.

A private TV Channel persuaded eleven Members of Parliament, including a Member of the Upper House, to receive money for raising questions in the Parliament and caught them on a secret camera. It was then telecast on 12 December, 2005. The Speakers of two Houses suspended all the Members shown on the TV. Similarly, another private TV channel persuaded seven Members of Parliament to receive commission to allot work for the Member of Parliament Local Area Development (MPLAD) scheme and caught them on a camera. It was telecast on 19 December, 2005.

Apparently, the TV channels conducted the operations to divert the attention of the people from the dominant issues plaguing the nation. None in India realized it. Thus while this issue was burning, the Union Government invited Expression of Interest (EoI) to sell eight percent of its 18.28 per cent shares in Maruti Udyog Limited from the public sector financial institutions on 19 December 2005.The MPs did question the motive behind the sting operations but did not pursue the matter to its logical conclusion. Therefore, the Parliament, through a resolution, expelled 11 M.Ps. The leader of the BJP felt the punishment as not for corruption but for the stupidity of seeking money for asking questions in Parliament.

In order to estimate the enormity of the crime committed during the recent past, it must be recalled that a guideline devised for privatization had forbidden the Government from selling the PSUs to charge-sheeted companies. Yet, the IPCL and some other PSUs were sold to charge- sheeted companies. Similarly, a PSU had been sold through the right hand after giving Re. 845 crore from a nationalized bank through the left hand. After the advent of the present Government, the Prime Minister gave Re.5000 crore  in the name of buying the shares just to enable a private company to buy assets all over the world. The money from the “cash rich enterprises” had been removed  in the name of developing India by leap and bounds. These are not acts of stupid corruption but cleaver corruption.

Even the President of India does not deny the allegation that the present Prime Minister gave the money as a reward for making him the Prime Minister of India. Even now, the Prime Minister is not only paying “truck-loads’ of money as tribute to a few stakes but also selling the shares of public sector companies to others. This is nothing but naked exploitation. The tragedy is that the Prime Minister indulges in exploiting 1000 million people. In other words, the Prime Minister is doing this for his own personal happiness and not at all for the happiness of 1000 million people. The Prime Minister knew that 52 letters had contributed a lot to save the PSUs or their shares from the clutches of the conspirators. He knew that the letters contributed their share to save the nation from the bad consequences of the BALCO judgement. He knew that this writer could achieve it not due to his position in the Government but due to whatever residual strength the Constitution of India possessed. Yet, the Prime Minister, apparently, is acting like a conspirator!

Inaugurating the diamond jubilee celebration of the Kerala History Association, the President of India on 18 December, 2005 said that the strength of the nation lay in the value its people had nurtured down the history and these should form the basis for the country’s march towards the future. He said that dogmas, rituals, systems and norms of the historical past continued to condition the mind of the people of India even after 58 years of independence. He added, “Now time has come in the 21st century when we need a new brand of historians who can make the past meet the present and create the future”. This is a reflection of the facts sent to His Excellency the President of India on 11 November, 2005. Apparently, the President thinks that anything that must be said privately or indirectly should not be said publicly or directly.

Though it is a digression, it must be pointed out that the Judicial Magistrate, Padmanabhapuram,  in Tamil Nadu State rejected a petition for the dispensation of personal appearance, issued a warrant and asked this man, who happened to be the second accused in a fabricated criminal case No 284/1997, to sit in front of him in the open court from 11 A.M. to 5.50 P.M. on 19 December, 2005. Some people in the court said someone from the District Court had asked the Magistrate to cancel all petitions. Everyone in India knows that the only remedy for illegal charge- sheeting by a police officer is the State Human Rights Commission (SHRC). This man also went to the SHRC and obtained an indictment against the Police Officer – a famous IPS officer in Tamil Nadu State. The SHRC, after investigation, clearly said that the IPS officer was “specifically involved in the case” and asked this man to use the finding in court proceedings. The finding had been duly submitted to the Magistrate. Recently, the President of India also exhorted the judiciary saying something with the meaning to consider the question of excluding the accused - if they were prima facie and really innocent - from a case if the petitioner did not turn up to give witness for four or five years. This man tried to talk to the Magistrate by handing over a letter to him. But everything went in vain as the Magistrate ignored it with the contempt it deserved. The Magistrate knew that the case was in his hands. The finding of the SHRC has no executive power. No escape. The police officers and the court could take away the personal liberty of any innocent man based on certain procedures! Satisfied with a days work, the Magistrate retired to his chamber at 5.45 P.M. and at 5.50 P.M. he passed a signal to this man to leave the court.

Coming back, on 23 December, 2005 a two judge Supreme Court Bench   allowed the appeal of the Government of Orissa against a High Court judgement. The High Court had held that the policy decision on allotment of quarters on a rotation basis was illegal. Delivering the judgement, the Supreme Court said the court should not substitute its judgement for that of the Executive and that the Constitution does not permit court to advise Executive on policy matters. At the same time, the learned judges contradicted their own words by saying that the courts could interfere when the decisions violated the fundamental rights or any statutory provisions. In other words, according to the present realization of the Supreme Court, the economic policy of the Government should not go against the fundamental rights. Does the Supreme Court really mean it? Why does the Supreme Court refuse to rectify the defects in the light of the new realization? Or does the Supreme Court say this to take away the fundamental rights- the gift of State, law or nature - from the people altogether as in the previous occasions?

In this connection, it must be emphasized that the 52 letters and the facts were sent to His Excellency the President of India based on the fundamental rights only. Thus, the fundamental right against exploitation prohibits the Government from selling the PSUs or their shares to any favoured people under any pretext. The fundamental right to equality also prohibits discrimination based on place of birth. The latter fundamental right reinforces over the former fundamental right and prohibits the Government from selling the PSUs or their shares directly or indirectly to the people of one or two States. In other words, the Government is forbidden from selling the PSUs or their shares before reserving them for various States. For the same reason, the Government is precluded from releasing the money of the public sector financial institutions to the brokers or people of any area disproportionately. Any violation by the Government or anyone in power would go down as misuse of official position and it would be a cognizable offence.

Similarly, the above two fundamental rights demand that the seats in the IITs, NITs, IIMs, Class I services and others must be reserved for various States equitably without wasting any time. Bulk buying is also a violation of fundamental rights because it involves big commission. This must be stopped forthwith because this also comes under the fundamental right against exploitations. For the same reasons, the big PSUs like the LIC, BSNL must be split so that the money collected from a State would return to it. Further, the fundamental right to freedom of speech demands that the works of citizens like this man must be made known to other citizens even if there were thousands of such men.

Is the Preamble of the Constitution of India different from the fundamental rights? There is practically no difference in the meaning. Thus, the words like, equality, democracy, freedom to impart ideas, liberty, fraternity and above all justice are synonyms of the words found under fundamental rights.

Is there any difference between fundamental rights and human rights? Here also, there is no practical difference. This is perhaps because the enactment of the Constitution of India was immediately after the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Therefore, the fundamental rights, human rights and the Preamble of the Constitution of India are almost similar to one another. This is the reason why a former President of India described fundamental rights “as a pledge to our people and a pact with the civilized world”. Therefore, the letters of this writer would have a universal application.

Is there any conflict between these 52 letters and capitalism? These letters are not at all against capitalism. The money deposited in the public sector financial institutions is the capital of the small investors, who refuse to hand over it to private parties. These institutions should not go the way of the Unit Trust of India (UTI) by advancing the money to favoured people to play on the floor of the stock market. Even otherwise, it is said that the money if not protected slips away fast. The money in these institutions should not be made available to anyone for manipulations offending the Preamble of the Constitution of India, fundamental rights or human rights. If allowed, all resources of this small planet would go in the hands of a few manipulators not through their industry but through their simple manipulations. Therefore, all private parties who require capital must tap private money and the Government must step in to use public funds for large-scale public investments.

The fundamental rights, according to Dr.Ambedkar, are heart and soul of the Constitution of India. The Supreme Court in the past considered fundamental rights, as basic structure of the Constitution of India and therefore these rights cannot be taken away even by amending the Constitution of India. However, the High Courts and the Supreme Court alone could enforce these rights. As the Supreme Court made the fundamental rights- the head of the Constitution of India- to roll in the dust, the Supreme Court cannot be trusted to enforce the fundamental rights at present. For strange reasons the National Human Rights Commission too is denying human rights as it is searching for ways to suppress these letters. The President could convene a meeting of the High Court judges or send a circular to them to ascertain their views. The learned judges might consider it as a writ petition and come out with remedial measures. If the President also were helpless to enforce the fundamental rights in one way or other, the Members of Parliament would have to consider the question of empowering any other body to enforce the same. 

 In this connection, it must be pointed out that the murderous knife of the Supreme Court that passed through the body of the Constitution of India in the petrol pump case created a deep hole in the body of the 1000 million people. The body is bleeding. Sitting in front of the investigation agencies, the learned judges of the Supreme Court, Prime Minister, President and above all 1000 million people a few boys are drinking the blood. The people in the street say that these boys receive Re.30 lakh for granting a petrol pump. They receive it not secretly but they sanction loan through nationalized banks and take the money for themselves. In return, they supply tin and metal pieces worth about two to five lakh. The owners of the petrol pumps would have to extract money from the people overpricing petrol and pay to the banks.  If two or three boys in India were fortunate like this, what would the unfortunate 1000 million people do? Will they not lose their strength to survive? The present Chief Justice of India and his predecessor have no feeling of shame for these shameless acts and laugh at 1000 million people for the present condition. Further, if the money were not recovered, will not the people consider the present Prime Minister also as a conspirator? Looking through another angle, is it not naked exploitation? As the right against exploitation is a fundamental right, President could at least consider the question of giving answers to such questions.

Furthermore, the people believe that these boys use the money to buy judgements, influence political leaders and to effectively disqualify the works of men like this writer. Thus, the people believe that they subvert democracy and deny human rights to Indians.

On 28 December, 2005 the media mafia reported that the public sector banks released Re. 1,720 crore as loan for Stock Market operations. The Union Government is, apparently, paying tribute to the stakes in this way to remain in power. This is nothing but arbitrary invasion by the state. It is out and out unconstitutional. Extracting money from all over India and releasing it to the people of one or two States is against fundamental rights because, as said earlier, the Constitution of India prohibits discrimination on grounds of place of birth. Obviously, the Government of India is acting immorally using bad influence.

Two armed militants entered the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore on 28 December, 2005 and killed a scientist and wounded five others.

On the same day a Congress leader opened 50,000 homes for the slum –dwellers of Mumbai.

In his New Year message, the President of India requested the people to resolve to excel in their mission in life.

The insurgents killed an Inspector General of Police in Manipur State.

Six people including five children were burnt alive in Bihar State.

Now, presumably due to the intensity of this work, the Left parties decided to oppose disinvestments in the profit making PSUs. At the same time, the employees of the BSNL, which has a transaction of Re. 33000 crore, said the Union Government was destroying it from within in bad faith.

A three judge Supreme Court Bench issued notices to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on a public interest litigation (PIL) petition to probe the allegation that the relatives of a former Union Minister for Communication, bought one crore shares of a private company for Re. one crore and sold back the same to the same company for Re.fifty five  crore within a span of two or three weeks in return for the benefits bestowed to the company. The favour bestowed to the company was that the Minister for Communication allowed the private company to launch its limited mobility capability phone with full mobility capability causing heavy loss to the exchequer. This case is in the hands of the Chief Justice of India. Will the Constitution of India escape from his hands? What happened to this case is not known to the people.

Twelve people were killed when the police opened fire on the people who agitated against the construction of a compound wall for a Steel Plant in Orissa.

In view of the new realization of the Supreme Court, the facts from 30 November, 2005 to 3 January 2006 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India through email on 4 January, 2006 for effective remedial measures.


61

 

BLACK PLAGUE

 

 

        A family of four was burnt alive in Utter Pradesh State on 4 January, 2006.

            A full Bench of the Andra Pradesh High Court had struck down the legislation providing for a five per cent quota for Muslims in public appointments. A three judge Bench of the Supreme Court on 4 January, 2006 refused to stay the operation of the judgement.

            The Allahabad High Court on 5 January, 2006 quashed the Central law that gave Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) its minority status and held illegal the reservation of seats for Muslims in its postgraduate medical courses. The learned judges said that the Supreme Court in 1968 had taken the view that the AMU was not a minority institution and enactment of a law by Parliament could not overrule the judgement.

            The Union Cabinet met on 6 January, 2006. The media mafias included some half-baked items in the agenda. Thus, the Cabinet cut the food subsidy by Re.4524 crore. The newspapers supported the decision. The Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu State immediately demanded the Union Government to withdraw the cut. A DMK party leader-a coalition partner-, also wanted the Prime Minister to withdraw the decision. The leader of the PMK, -another coalition partner- said that the decision would not be implemented. To the utter surprise of everyone in India, the spokesperson of the Congress party on 9 January 2006 issued a fiat to the Government to cancel the decision. On the next day, a Union Minister announced the withdrawal of the decision. Obviously, it was not a decision of the Union Cabinet, Congress party or the ruling alliance. Even the Prime Minister would not have applied his mind over this matter. The decision was not due to any dearth of funds also. It is clear that it was a decision taken by some hidden hands. This indicates that the Prime Minister is not enjoying full control over the Executive. Obviously, the manipulators, who made most of their opportunities during 1991-1996 and ruined the country, are very active in the backrooms of power.

            The Prime Minister on 7 January, 2006 said that India was on the threshold of unprecedented opportunities. He added that if right choices were made and the country remained cohesive and faithful to the objectives enshrined in the Constitution, the opportunities could be realized. This is, apparently, the reply of the Prime Minister to the facts sent to His Excellency the President of India on 4 January, 2006.

            It must be stated that the system, apparently, considers the giant manipulators in India as the real crown of 1000 million people. Therefore, if the IPCL, VSNL and the other unconstitutionally privatized PSUs were taken back, the system apparently reckons that the progress of India would be impeded, as these manipulators would be offended and the opportunities wasted. However, everyone must realize that it is not at all possible to go on paying tribute like this. They would become anarchists one day or other even if the system was ready to transfer Re. 10,000 crore to them everyday. In fact, none knows when they would turn against the1000 million people to demonstrate their power. 

            In the meantime, the High Court, Delhi issued notice to the Speaker of Parliament regarding the expulsion of 11 Members of Parliament. The Supreme Court also followed suit.

            Though it is a digression, it must be stated that the following letter was sent through Email to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, The Netherlands.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Vellicode

                                                                                                                        12-1-2006

 

 

 

 

Dear Sir

            Sub: Request to consider the question of nominating this writer for the Nobel Peace Prize-regarding.

           

            This is in continuation of the three letters sent to the Hon’ble Prime Minister of The Netherlands on 22 July 2005, 26 November 2005 and 3 January 2006.

            A copy of the email sent to His Excellency President of India on 4 January 2006 follows in this letter.

            It could be discerned that the 52 letters and the facts sent to His Excellency the President of India: 

 

1.      Lifted India from a grave fiscal crisis in 2001 and made 1000 million people relatively happier.

2.      Enabled the political leaders to lead India with great strength and confidence.

3.      Saved many Public Sector Undertakings from the clutches of the conspirators.

4.      Curtailed several unethical exploitations and controlled with limited success the so-called manipulationalism.

5.      Exposed the nature of the media mafias, judiciary and investigation agencies.

6.      Proved that the composition of the present Union Government does not reflect the will of the people of India but was predetermined by the unethical manipulators.

7.      Showed that the system does not respect the rights and freedom of others as in many other countries.

8.      Made some efforts, perhaps in vain, to bring the Constitution of India on its rails

9.      Contributed greatly to furthering human rights and peace in India and

10.  Gave a new hope to the nation of 1000 million people.

 

Now, many factors that prompted this writer to take the pen still remain. In fact, the concealment of these letters and therefore the tendency to suppress the truth is affecting the politics of India like a black plague. However, there is a feeling that this writer would get Nobel Peace Prize for silently transforming India into a new nation provided this work is brought to the notice of the Nobel Prize Committee.

Therefore, this work may kindly be analyzed to find its real worth; and this writer may kindly be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. It would go down as a service to humanity because the nomination would enable the next generation of Indians to reap at least the present advantages that the 1000 million people have been privileged to enjoy.

(As the Hon’ble Prime Minister of England also sent a reply to this writer, a similar letter has been sent to him in a CD through post).

 

Thanking your Excellency

 

Yours faithfully

 

(V.SABARIMUTHU).

 

Coming back, on 12 January, 2006 the Union Government sold 8 percent of its equity stake in Maruti Udyog Ltd for Re.1,567 crore to eight public financial institutions. The financial institutions would sell the shares to the favoured people after the lock in period. Thus the representatives of the stakes in the Union Government disregarded 52 letters and the other relevant facts sent to His Excellency President of India, deprived people of their property and committed one more murder to their credit.

Even as the shares were sold, one or two newspapers silently disclosed that four fictitious investors had cornered 8.29 percent of the retail category of the IDFC public offer. Their four entities opened more than 42,000 false accounts and grabbed more than one crore shares of the IDFC. They had earlier acquired the shares of the Yes Bank and others adapting similar methods. All other Initial Public Offers (IPOs) were - as predicted by this writer- manipulated in a similar way. They would later sell the shares to the LIC making huge profits. In fact, 90 percent of all the IPOs have been going to thousands of fictitious demat or electronic accounts. The Bharat Overseas Bank, HDFC Bank, Vysya Bank, Vijaya Bank, IDBI Bank, SBI Capital Markets were cited as examples.

Noticing the above frightful incidents, a Union Minister on 13 January, 2006  said that he knew the culprits. But, he put the blame on the software engineers who designed the system. Finally, he implored the manipulators not to repeat the manipulation to corner the shares of the public sector Andra Bank and Bank of Baroda, which would hit the market very soon. In other words, he asked them not to use the same trick for financial plundering.

The disclosure is consistent with the theory that the shares of the PSUs just like private IPOs have been going into the hands of the unscrupulous crowd and that 1000 million people have been deprived of their property, all in violation of the fundamental rights. Thus, all the people of Assam put together would not have got 1 percent of the shares of the IDFC but four or five boys from Mumbai could grab 8.29 percent of the shares of the IDFC alone!  If the Union Government were to hand over the shares of all PSUs to a few boys from Mumbai like this, why should Assam remain with the Indian Union? Is it not a treachery to take the gun against them? Is not the revelation a victory for the persistent view of this writer? Whose property must be confiscated for this?

Further, if this financial plundering could be accurately predicted by a common man lacking in knowledge about the inner working of the Stock Exchanges, what all the CBI and the various functionaries in the Department of Finance know? Literally, “it is like destroying Taj Mahal for the value of its marbles”. Selling one share of a PSU in this manner could be compared to the murder of an innocent man by a terrorist. In this connection, it is pertinent to note that despite the manipulations that took place during his previous stint as the Finance Minister of India, everyone believed that the present Prime Minister would contribute colourful pages to the history of the country. But the present manipulations in Mumbai are bringing disgrace upon disgrace to him and to the nation. Apparently, the hands of the Prime Minister are tied and he is helpless to prevent or control the manipulations. As the manipulators thwart the efforts of the Prime Minister to bring the Constitution on its rails, a secret sorrow is, apparently, preying upon him.

When some PSUs were privatized, this writer moaned and pointed out the unconstitutional nature of the sale to His Excellency the President of India. Immediately, the former Prime Minister, in spite of all his courage and resourcefulness, halted the sale of PSUs to charge-sheeted companies. Had the sale been constitutional, no force in this land could have prevented him from selling the PSUs.

In the sale of the VSNL the system made a short work of the Constitution of India. Again the agony of the people was conveyed to the President. Had the sale been correct, all the nationalized banks and several other PSUs including the BSNL would have gone into the hands of private parties through simple paper adjustments.

The moment the present Prime Minister thought of spending his precious time in the cause of private parties, this writer again pleaded to the President. Neither did the Prime Minister give heed to the protests nor did the President dissuade the Prime Minister from jumping into the hands of the unscrupulous crowd.

It is now clear that the innocent head that rolled in the dust inside the Supreme Court was not the Preamble of the Constitution of India. It was the “basic structure of the Constitution of India”. It is said that the basic structure of the Constitution could not be changed even by the Parliament. But, the Supreme Court quite cunningly extinguished it through simple judgements. Otherwise, how could the system perpetrate the above illegalities upon 1000 million people? Had there been one percent constitutionalism or humanism, leave alone patriotism, in the veins of the Supreme Court, this would not have happened in India. It is nothing but the culmination of the extermination of freedom and, therefore, the basic structure of the Constitution of India that the plots and conspiracies to conceal the 52 letters and the above unconstitutional manipulations succeeded. It is “affecting the politics of India like a black plague’.

Chanakya says that the act of murder is not a crime like in battlefield or in self- defense. Now, in India the act of murder is not a crime in Supreme Court!

Is there any way to escape from this predicament? Fortunately, even now the system could put right - at least partly- the public wrongs of the past few years. It is said that all perfection in the world are attended by some imperfection. The people will have to accept all human beings with all their associated evils. However, anyone would tell that first step is the restitution of the lost PSUs. For this, the President must love truth. The Prime Minister must give heed to the well-meant counsel of the President. He must also respect public opinion and generous enough to spend his time in the cause of the country and the people. The Supreme Court must be gracious, impartial and fair-minded. If all functionaries were even now impervious to all arguments, the other leaders and the Members of Parliament could show the way and save the nation.

Obviously, the conclusion that the Supreme Court has extirpated the basic structure of the Constitution of India is not based on one or two incidents or judgements. The act of concealing this work, a series of bad and unconstitutional judgements, a series of exploitations of the people in violation of the fundamental rights and human rights and the inaction of the investigation agencies, National Human Rights Commission and the Government over several financial plundering prove this conclusion. Most important positive point is that the stakes did not so far carry out their threat to eliminate this writer. Perhaps, they realize that this work is not directed against anyone but the natural consequence of the happenings in India.

It must be acknowledged that several officers, Members of Parliament, political leaders and many others knowingly or unknowingly contributed their share to enrich this work. The former Prime Minister of India, the present Prime Minister of India, Congress President and the leaders of many political parties complemented the efforts of this writer in one-way or other. The imposition of service charges by the NDA Government and the introduction of transaction charges by the present Government are outstanding examples. Former President was a source of great encouragement. The present President of India also indirectly encourages through his periodic utterances. Recently, he said that he considered the achievements of the people hailing from villages as his own achievements. Now, the President of India knows the real worth of this work. There is a strong feeling that this writer would get Nobel Peace Prize for this work if it were brought to the notice of the Nobel Prize Committee. Therefore, His Excellency the President of India, the Members of Parliament and the Government of India may kindly consider the question of nominating this writer for the Nobel Peace Prize besides re-constructing a new India.

The facts from 4 January, 2006 to 15 January, 2006 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India through Email on 16 January, 2006


62

 

THE FIENDS

 

 

 

 

A few days passed without significant developments. A newspaper on 22 January, 2006 said that the Prime Minister did not enjoy any real power. The people thought that the newspaper was indicating the discomfiture of the manipulators.

In the meantime, the Public Issue of the Andra Bank and the Bank of Baroda –two public sector banks- passed off silently. The sale of shares without any reservation scheme for various States indicated the domination of the manipulators. The national newspapers  did not disclose anything about the sale although some people said that it was oversubscribed by more than eleven times. Thus, the system again made a short work of the Constitution of India without the least compunction and deprived the people of Assam and others of their properties. Evidently, the present Government is committing spoils from time to time plundering the people wholesale. However, the Prime Minister ironically proclaimed to 1000 million people that the motto of his Government was development with social equity.

The All India Congress Committee plenary session in a landmark resolution on 22 January, 2006 said that the Congress Party, and therefore the Union Government, had realized its responsibility. The resolution requested the Left parties to refrain from criticizing it. The resolution, apparently, showed that the Government understood the meaning of 52 letters and none including the Left parties need give any suggestion to it. If it were true, it must be a welcome change. Plato also said that those who love Reason alone are fit to rule. As if to complement the resolution, the Prime Minister-while musing over some secret worry- said that he was committed to create a new India. His words were reminiscent of the words used in the facts sent to His Excellency the President of India on 16 January, 2006. However, the Prime Minister did not disclose his way to create a new India.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), in the meantime, directed the banks to do a comprehensive check on their funding of Initial Public Offering (IPO) issues in the last three years. It was to find out the role of registrars, depository participants, brokers and individuals for manipulating bank funds through fictitious accounts for cornering the retail portion of the primary issues. The RBI further imposed a fine ranging from Re. 5 lakh to Re. 20 lakh on seven public and private banks for violating know your customer (KYC) regulations. In a damage control exercise, ING Vysya Bank suspended a Branch Manager saying that there were 600 irregular accounts. Indian Overseas Bank also removed two Branch Managers in Ahmedabad. There were indirect reports that all investigation agencies are probing into the matter. The investigation agencies that concealed the 52 letters would not reveal the truth in this matter. However, the future alone would tell whether these steps were mere eyewash or not.

In this connection, it must be noted that the decision to identify the manipulators is a revolutionary step. This decision is a giant step consistent with the 52 letters and the facts sent to His Excellency the President of India. This decision seeks to prove the contentions of this writer scientifically. This gives the impression that the President of India or a small body of informed people is taking control of the situation for the benefit of 1000 million people. In fact, it appears that the defeat of the manipulators is inevitable as this small body of committed leaders might take necessary steps to confiscate the assets acquired using public funds. There would not be any dearth for committed officers to do this job. The detailed analysis of the destination of the shares might enable the people to discover the actual location of political, economic and judicial strength of the manipulators. The only condition is that the job must be done faithfully and sincerely. Will the Government do it? Finally, nothing came out of the probe. The people could not know the truth.

In the Republic Day message to the nation on 25 January 2006, His Excellency the President of India said that enlightened people were needed for the progress of the country. Citing the story of the ‘lost sheep” in the Bible, the President said that the 26% people who live in the below poverty line must be rescued. What does the President mean by the “lost sheep”? Does he mean the lost PSUs? The President of India alone knows the answer.

The King of Saudi Arabia, Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz al-Saud, was the chief guest of the Republic Day Parade. Breaking protocol, the Prime Minister himself went to the Airport to welcome him. It was a bold decision to take the nation away from the clutches of the media mafias. Now, the Prime Minister of India respects the King of Saudi Arabia. Naturally, the King would respect the large number of Indians working in his kingdom. The decision is consistent with the letter No 45 dated 8-12-2004 of this writer.

In another revolutionary decision, presumably taken at the instance of a Congress leader, ten Cabinet Ministers from North, South, East, West and Centre were inducted in the Union Cabinet. Twelve Ministers of State were also added.

In this connection, it must be stated that one or two representatives of the stakes also might have sneaked into the Council of Ministers. Further, some real representatives of the people are remaining either as the Ministers of State or as Members of Parliament while a few  known manipulators are functioning as Cabinet Ministers. Furthermore, one or two States have no adequate representation. Yet, anyone would agree that the present Union Cabinet is one of the most heterogeneous one India has ever seen. Obviously, it is the answer to the allegation present in the facts sent to His Excellency the President of India on 16 January, 2006 that the composition of the Union Cabinet did not reflect the will of the people. Now, a large number of committed leaders in the Union Cabinet would be expected to control the self-interest of six or seven representatives of the stakes. But, great tragedy would befall on the nation, if they failed to be independent in distinguishing between the good and the bad in crucial matters affecting the nation, their own States and their own children.

The Ministry of Petroleum has been witnessing some unfaithful joint ventures. The decision to give a joint bid along with China to buy an oil field abroad was the most unfaithful decision of the Government of India. Even a child in India would tell that the decision mortgaged the sovereignty of India because the border dispute with China still remains unsettled. Some people suspect that the joint bid was given at the behest of a few corporate houses that wanted to establish their business in China.

Further, the Ministry of Petroleum is neither ready to take back the IPCL nor ready to delegate the petroleum business to various States. Paradoxically, a Union Minister openly declared that his dealings were transparent although he was against the decentralization of corruption. Therefore, substituting him with another man must be construed as a revolutionary decision provided the new Minister is ready to part with all unfaithful decisions and policies. By the way, Tamil Nadu State lost a powerful Minister although he did not do anything substantial to Tamil Nadu during the last 20 months.

In this connection, it must be pointed out that a newspaper on 30 January, 2006 revealed that the Ministry of Petroleum had been functioning as a lubricant for party finances. Why does the paper realize the truth now? It must be noted that no former Petroleum Ministers have denied the allegation. However, the allegation should not go unnoticed. If the charge were true, any Minister for Petroleum would see a gold mine in his chair. He would get not less than Re. 1000 crore or even Re 10000 crore every year. Now, it is the onerous responsibility of the President of India, Prime Minister and the Congress leader to prove or disprove the allegation of the newspaper scientifically.

No sooner the twenty-two members were inducted into the Union Council of Ministers, than the Union Government privatized the Delhi and Mumbai airports! A company called GMR-Fraport won the bid for Delhi Airport and another company called GVK-South Africa bagged the Mumbai Airport. The people did not know the real owners of the companies. The bids of four other companies were rejected. The privatization was done after sending the President of India on a ten-day tri-nation tour.  The privatization was so sudden that it appeared that the airports were exchanged for including twenty-two members in the Ministry. Alternatively, the airports might have been exchanged to the media mafia to suppress many murky and illegal deals.  In fact, the system did not give even two days time to the new Ministers to cogitate over the matter. This showed that the Government could pursue its privatization policies more easily by including them in the Cabinet than by keeping them out. Anyone watching the way of privatization would tell that the Government was thieving something from the hands of 1000 million people.

Immediately, the employees of the Airport Authority of India (AAI) went on a strike protesting the privatization. They sat in front of the airports like forlorn people. Other employees also performed their ritual by screaming and moaning in front of the Central Government offices all over India.

At the same time, the President of India spent his time very happily with children in Singapore. A Congress leader was seen sitting with some poor women of Andra Pradesh. The leader might have noticed that the women were unaware of the airport privatization.

 The Government said that what happened to the airports was nothing but modernization. The Minister for Finance also said that the Government did not privatize anything. He added that the decision enjoyed the backing of the Left parties. The Left parties told the workers that the decision would not be reversed under any circumstance. Naturally the workers were constrained to call off their strike within four days. The Prime Minister in his characteristic style did not talk anything about the matter but advised the local bodies to solve the drinking water problem. Further, he narrated the benefits of rural employment scheme and promised to attain 10 % growth rates within the next ten years. A Company went to the High Court, Delhi saying that something unconstitutional took place during bidding although many believed that the successful companies might have been its own shadow companies. Alternatively, these successful companies might sell the airports to this company within one or two years.

The High Court, Delhi in a case filed by someone directed the agitating employees not to hold demonstration within 500 metre from the main gates not only in the Delhi airport but also all over the country. In this matter, the High Court, Delhi, functioned like the Supreme Court with its jurisdiction extending all over India. It was not clear whether the AAI approached the Chief Justice of India or not. If it had approached him, the Chief Justice of India would have asked them to approach a suitable High Court in view of the 52 letters. Now, the High Court, Delhi would do to the stakes what the Supreme Court did to them in the petrol pump case and in some other cases. However, the result would depend upon the alertness of the President. For this, he would have to transfer the Chief Justice of High Court, Delhi to prevent miscarriage of justice. Alternatively, the President could change the Bench besides supplying 52 letters and the facts to the learned judges.

The President of India must know the pros and cons of the so-called modernization of airports. However, it must be pointed out that the Government or private parties could do the airports, roads, railways, refineries and mining works. Both the parties avail themselves of the public funds in the banks and the LIC. When the Government does this through the public sector undertakings, the Government could reserve the shares among various States besides extracting money from all over India. Then the PSUs would belong to them and the people would get an investment opportunity.

On the other hand, when the private parties do the same work, they would not only extract money from all over India but also they would avail themselves of the deposits in the banks through various ways. There would be no reservation of shares. The hard earned money of Indians would be squandered and the freedom of expression would be denied.  The only advantage is that the private parties would infuse the commission from various buying and selling and the commission obtained from various liquor manufacturers into their projects.

Opposing the privatization policies, the people rejected the NDA Government and chose the present UPA Government. The people did their duty. If the UPA Government wanted to follow the path of the NDA Government, what would the people do? Where would the people go?

Further, the letters of this writer succeeded in dissuading the NDA Government from its dangerous course. Now, in spite of some apparent revolutionary steps, the present Government might not come out of its reckless course even if some one screamed for five years.

Everyone must note that the two airports and other PSUs are the inalienable property of the people of Kashmir, Assam and other States. If their properties were to be transferred to private parties like this or the funds in the financial institutions were to be siphoned off to private parties under one pretext or other, Assam and Kashmir would have nothing to lose except the signboards of a few private companies as and when they become free. In fact, it would be a real freedom for those States.

On the other hand, if these States were given definite quota of shares in the airports and other PSUs, the Union Ministers from these States could ask their people whether they wanted to part with their shares or assets in the SAIL, GAIL and other PSUs in India. In other words, if the people of Assam had no shares in the Neyveli Lignite Corporation in (NLC) in Tamil Nadu State, the people of Tamil Nadu would have no right to the oil in Assam. In short, the Government is, in bad faith, preparing conditions for the withering away of Assam by privatizing the airports, all for wealth.

In contrast, the boys in Assam and other States –when they fight for their rights- are fighting for the UNITY of India. Ironically, those who work for the disintegration of India, use the armed forces against those who work for the UNITY of India. Apparently, the boys are knowingly or unknowingly increasing the lusture of this work.

Obviously, the so-called modernization of the airports undermines the UNITY present in the Constitution of India. Therefore, the privatization is unconstitutional. The Government cannot but reverse the decision, if it had any respect for the Constitution of India.. Taking advantage of the suppression of the letters, the Government would resist this demand is another matter.

Is there any precedent for it? Around the year 1725, the King of Travancore became sick. The revenue of the country fell down steeply and the king was left literally without men or money. Anarchy and confusion prevailed and the chieftains began to control the country. Defying the king, they began to collect money forcefully. Then they   plundered the country in all possible ways. They even removed the jewels on the ears of women.

 In India, the Government became bankrupt in 2001 due to the policies introduced by the present Prime Minister in 1991. As a natural consequence, anarchy and confusion in their worst form stalked the nation in 2001. The stakes plundered the PSUs one after another in the name of a policy called “reform’. Now, taking advantage of a weak President, the stakes have removed the jewels on the ears of Mother India! 

The root cause for removing the jewels from the ears of Mother India is the Supreme Court. This writer sent the first eight letters to the learned judges of the Supreme Court. When this writer pointed out to the learned judges that a private company bought an important PSU exploiting the money in the public sector Bank of India, they simply ignored it. Having understood their mind, this writer stopped sending letters to them for some time. Now, they would try their best not to look foolish in the discovery of their plot and their ignominious discomfiture. Will the next generation of the people not consider them as fiends for concealing these letters?

All the letters and the facts have been duly sent to The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). But, the NHRC too is conspiring to conceal these letters. What would the people think of their service? Now, a Member of the NHRC, wants to have a body to control the lawlessness of the disloyal judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court. His suggestion appeared in the newspapers on 4 February, 2006.

 Similarly, instead of taking back the IPCL for violating the guidelines for privatization, the present Government is accepting the bids of a private company for privatization and for various works.  Will not the next generation of our people consider the people manning the present system as fiends for keeping the 52 letters away from the watchful eyes of the children?

Had the President of India loved truth, the airports could have been saved. The truth is 52 letters and the facts associated with them. The President should have caused the children to peruse the letters. They might have realized that the increase in power of the manipulators could not but be pregnant with the most alarming consequences to their interests. Then the President could have regained all the lost PSUs, strengthened the Constitution of India and established order long ago.

It is true that the President has been indirectly complementing the efforts of this writer through his utterances. But, it is also true that his actions contributed to the suppression of the 52 letters. By suppressing the letters, President of India is –all right thinking people would tell- knowingly or unknowingly paving the way for the final ruin of the Constitution of India.

Is it possible to restore the Constitution to its pre-eminent position? Subhadra was an illegitimate child. She lost her mother very early in life. Her husband had deserted her. She was a victim of scandal and slander. She was misunderstood as a woman of easy virtue because of her openness and sharpness of mind. Around the year 1730, due to some intuition, she determined to prevent regicide in Travancore. C.V.Raman Pillai says that her thinking was six jumps ahead of others to save the Prince Marthanda Varma. She saved the Prince on two occasions. Though she reaped nothing but the reward of death, Marthanda Varma, the maker of the modern Travancore, ruled over the country enjoying the love and loyalty of his subjects for a long period. It is not clear whether there is any exaggeration in it or not. But, the President of India must think at least one or two jumps ahead of others to regain the lost PSUs and to save the Constitution of India.

As the Constitution of India has been once again murdered for its wealth, the facts from 16 January, 2006 to 5 February, 2006 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India on 6 February, 2006.


63

 

 

A SUPER BODY

 

 

 

            On 6 February, 2006 the President of India said that he saw a bright future to Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) State. On the same day, the Defense Minister announced the withdrawal of 5000 troops from the J&K thanks to the improvement in the law and order situation in the State.

            Some newspapers on 6 February, 2006 criticized France for preventing a Non Resident Indian (NRI) businessman from acquiring a big steel company in Europe. The paper said that the French and Luxembourg political establishments were undermining the efforts of the NRI by imparting a racist colour. In this connection, a Union Minister told the European Commission (EC) that the opposition to the bids violated the norms of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The media mafias in India pointed out that the Airbus Industries had orders for 263 Aircraft worth $16.5 billion from India. The mafias said that it was uncharitable on the part of France to seek multi- billion dollar contracts in India on one hand and opposing a NRI on the other. The arguments of the media mafias gave the impression that India had expected France to transmit the benefits of big buying to the NRI.

            Why do the media mafias in India club the orders for 263 aircraft, purchase of 7 submarines and other big buying from France with a steel company? Did the NRI play any latent role for buying Airbus aircraft for Indian companies in the hope of buying a steel company? 

            The President of France, Mr.Jacques Chirac, came to India on 17 February 2006 with five Cabinet Ministers and several top executives of companies. The Prime Minister of India, perhaps quite inadvertently, raised the above matter during the bilateral talks. To this, the President of France said that   France had no prior information regarding the hostile take over bid and that was not the usual way of buying the companies in Europe. He, further, said that France wanted to adopt a wait and watch policy.

            The developments in Europe are consistent with the letters sent to his Excellency the President of France and the Hon’ble Prime Minister of The Netherlands.

            It is evident that the public sector Indian Airlines (IA) and Air India (AI) did not buy aircraft as and when they wanted. Is it because the green signal for buying aircraft did not come from the manipulators settled in England? This is not to say that a private company inhibited the growth of the IA and the AI at all. This is only to say that when the media associate the question of buying aircraft and other items from France with a steel company issue, the people would recall the past incidents. Anyone noticing this would think that all big buying from Europe involves big commission to one NRI or other.  Further, the private parties might have employed some middlemen for their big buying from France. Who got this amount?

            These developments and the steps taken for the privatization of airports lead to the realization that those who were capable of crippling the IA, AI and the airports outdistanced all other Members of Parliament who ran for the coveted posts in the Union Cabinet.

            Further, the developments are consistent with the seventh point in the letter No.33 dated 18-6- 2004.

The militant people killed nine soldiers by triggering  a land mine on 5 February, 2006.

            The Law Commission suggested the formation of National Judicial Council (NJC) to take action against the erring judges. This news came out on 10 February, 2006.

            The extremists killed eight soldiers in Chhattisgarh State on 10 February.

            Presumably referring to the email sent on 6 February, 2006 the President of India on 13 February, 2006 said that one must work hard to achieve success.

            The Prime Minister of India on 13 February, 2006 gave an assurance to the leader of the MDMK party that the Centre would not resort to disinvesting the shares of the Neyveli Lignite Corporation (NLC) in Tamil Nadu. In this way, the Prime Minister of India agreed that disinvesting the shares of the NLC in the present way would not be in public interest.

On the same day, while the Prime Minister was talking with the leader of the MDMK, there were reports that Union Bank of India, a Public Sector Bank, would sell 8.91percent of its shares from 15-2-2006 onwards bringing down the shareholding of the Government of India to 55.43 percent.  The employees did not shout anything against it. The political parties had no comment. The people did not murmur. The Cabinet Ministers from North, South, East, West and Centre did not demand any definite quota of shares for their own children or for their own States. In fact, none in India seemed to have the strength even to protest. Based on this one would infer that even the new Ministers in the Union Cabinet do not enjoy any measure of freedom of discussion or action. Absence of debate at considerable length in the “SUPREME decision making body of India” would be calamitous for the nation.

            Some newspapers, in the meantime, acknowledged that the newspapers in India would find it difficult to escape from corporate influence.

            Oil India Ltd (OIL) on 13 February, 2006 submitted a bid to acquire a block in the Egyptian oil fields.

            In this connection, it must be noted that the OIL is now not accompanying any NRI or China to submit the bid. Apparently, the new Minister for Petroleum– consistent with the facts sent to the President on 6 February 2006 - has taken necessary steps to rescue India from the clutches of the conspirators. This could be considered as a victory for this man. However, it must be noted that it is customary for the Government to take a circuitous route to favour the manipulators. To show that the Government has abandoned its policy for good, all exploration works in India must be given to public sector oil companies so that the public money would go for public investments. Similarly, several refineries could be started for tapping public money. However, it would require great dedication from the Minister for Petroleum to resist the demands from one or two private players.

            But a Supreme Court Bench on 21 February, 2006 upheld the earlier verdict of a High Court, Delhi that the court could not interfere in the policy of the Government that allowed 74% private participation on Mumbai and Delhi airports. The court even imposed a fine for bringing the case to the Supreme Court. Earlier, in order to make one man rich, the Supreme Court cancelled the petrol pumps allotted by the Members of Parliament. Such unconstitutional policies are continuing everywhere. For instance, in order to make two or three men rich, some States ban toddy tapping jeopardizing the lives of toddy tapers. Many States indulge in bulk buying. Many works undertaken in the Build Operate and Transfer (BOP) basis are unconstitutional because there is no dearth of funds for the Union Government and the State Governments.  The contract works also must be given in pieces to different individuals of different States. In all such cases the unlawful activity is depicted as lawful activity and vice versa. Surely, as the Supreme Court abdicates its responsibility even after 52 letters, a new body is needed to determine whether a policy is constitutional or not.

            The Supreme Court on 13 February, 2006 referred to it all petitions filed in the High Court, Delhi in the “ M.P’s cash – for - query” case.

            Presumably as a reply to the facts sent to His Excellency the President of India on 6 February, 2006, the Prime Minister of India said that the foreign policy had to be changed as a consequence of the global economic changes.

            The CBI on 13 February, 2006 arrested the Director of a software company for committing a “fraud” to the tune of Re.595 crore while selling un-allotted, unlisted or prohibited shares in 2001. 

            On the same day, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) debarred a company for its –in the words of the CBI- fraudulent actions. There were bits of information that the Initial Public Offers (IPOs) of the Public Sector Undertakings including the ONGC and the Power Trading Corporation in 2004 were all replete with manipulations. The SEBI imposed a namesake fine of Re. 2 lakh on the MCS LTD, the registrar to public issues. This news comes out very sparingly only now. The man in the street could predict it long ago. Naturally, all knowledgeable men in the system must have prior information about it. Yet the IPOs continue for one public sector bank or other with the knowledge of even the President of India!

            In this connection, it must be pointed out that the hardest word used by this man for describing the methods adapted to corner public asset was “manipulation”. But the CBI, which functions directly under the Prime Minister of India and under the over all supervision of the President of India, uses the word “fraud” to describe the manipulations. What does this mean? Is it not consistent with the letters of this writer? Are the people free to use this word? This again reinforces the impression that there must be a super body apart from the Supreme Court to determine whether a policy is constitutional or not.  

            The newspapers on 16 February, 2006 reported that a private company raised $1.5 billion from 14 national and international banks to part finance its $6 billion refinery project. It must be recalled that the Finance Minister of India had to prevail upon the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) to give a loan of Re. 200 crore to the Government of Kerala a few years ago. But private companies raise the money without the knowledge of the people. Is it possible without the interference of the Union Ministers and the CBI? Further, will not the private companies use the money for manipulating the system and to deny freedom of expression? Why does the Government hand over public money into private hands without any limitation? Why does the Government fail to use the money for public investments through public sector oil companies or for avoiding BOT policy? The Constitution of India prescribes that there must be a certain maximum for private companies to raise public funds from financial institutions. If it were not done, all those who raise money and all those who give money would continue to deny freedom of expression to 1000 million people.

            On 22 February, 2006, the CBI registered two cases against two investment companies and certain officials of two banks. Besides, the CBI raided 21 places in connection with the Initial Public Offering (IPO) case and arrested four front men and three financiers, all consistent with the 52 letters and the associated facts. However, the fate of the case was not known to anyone.  

            Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd (HPCL) – a Public Sector Undertaking- raised $200 million through external commercial borrowings. The financial institutions in India hand over the money to private companies. At the same time, the public sector oil companies borrow money from abroad. There is no dearth for foreign exchange also. The President of India alone knows the reason for it.

            In the joint session of the Parliament on 16 February, 2006 the President said that India was following an enlightened foreign policy in the best interest of the nation. He described India as an influential actor on the international stage due to its capability to shoulder responsibilities- global and regional. Furthermore, he said that his Government was ready to talk to all political groups to solve their real or imaginary problems.

            A newspaper on 17 February, 2006 pointed out that speed breakers and diversions were being placed before the Prime Minister in all his efforts relating to privatization and other important matters.

            On the same day, the Prime Minister, exhibiting a secret sorrow, deplored that there was no group in India to shape and reshape the public policies of the Government.

            On 19 February, 2006, some newspapers attacked a Congress leader through some vitriolic comments. Obviously, the Congress leader is in catch- 22 situations. If a person loved Reason, the media mafias would not allow him to survive. If he loved the media mafias, the voice of Reason would torment him.

            The Prime Minister on 23 February, 2006 said that shadowy organizations would not be allowed to “interfere” in the work of the elected Governments. He wanted the people to judge his Government based on its performance. The Prime Minister could proclaim this to the people because seldom people know that the Prime Minister dragged calamity upon his own head by giving Re.5000 crore from public sector banks to a private company just for making him the Prime Minister of India. His only consolation is that the Supreme Court would not interfere in this matter because the act of giving money to private company is a “policy”. However, common man could interfere because of the unconstitutional nature of the policy.

            On the same day, the facts from 4 January, 2006 to 5 February, 2006 comprising 10 pages were sent by post to 10 Members of Parliament and a Minister.

            The public sector TV channel on 25 February, 2006 reported that a Korean company would invest $52 million in India very soon. The common man thought that the Korean Company had left the land because of the unconstitutional adjustments of interests. The media mafia did not mention anything about the activities of this company because they stand for dispossessing the property of the people. The Supreme Court is not coming into the picture because dispossessing the property of the people is a policy.

In this connection, it must be submitted that the mineral deposits in Orissa belong to the people of Kerala. The people of Kerala had been plunging several fathoms into the sea for a very long period of time since independence for earning foreign exchange. The people of Orissa have been utilizing it for its foreign exchange needs. Now, Orissa says that it is free to hand over its mineral wealth to a foreign company! Orissa could do so only if the Steel Authority of India (SAIL) were not capable of undertaking this work. The Government of Orissa and the Union Government must comply with this because of the word UNITY present in the Constitution of India.

Now, there is no quota in the “seats or assets” for the people of Kerala. Naturally, all the labours of the people of Kerala have gone in vain. Anticipating such predicaments, there was a demand from Travancore Kingdom to join its territory with the USA rather than with the rest of India. The present system should not prove that there was a meaning in that demand. As the Supreme Court rejects this as a policy, all States in India must inculcate some give and take policy for the UNITY of India.          

            The new Minister for Petroleum has at least partially rescued the ONGC from the clutches of a NRI Company. The conclusion is based on the reports that in the unfaithful and unconstitutional memorandum of understanding of the two joint ventures between him and the ONGC,  the ONGC, NRI Company and a private bank had 49.98, 48.02 and 2 percent shares respectively. Now, the new Minister, the President or someone in the system has found out to the great dismay of everyone that the above NRI is a director on the board of the private bank and as such the above two joint ventures  would be the property of the NRI. Realizing it, the 2 percent shareholding has been handed over to the public sector SBI Capital Markets. A newspaper on 26 February, 2006 said that the former Minister of Petroleum was not aware of the fact that the NRI was a director of the private bank. But, people believe that the Minister and the NRI were thick friends. This is what is going on in Delhi. Is it a child’s play? The people say that it is manipulation with permission. This writer could predict it although everyone now indirectly ridicules him and accuses him of interfering in the activities of the elected Government.

 Obviously, the ONGC would have gone in the hands of the NRI but for the 52 letters and the associated facts. Now, it is imperative for the Government to disclose the assets of the above NRI in India. If the revelations were true, he must be debarred from undertaking any work in India. This is because he, apparently, represents the mysterious “fifth force” in India. The NDA Government had taken a similar decision based on the first letter dated 1-6-2001. It is very essential because some people even think that the NRI –and not anyone in India- is the de-facto ruler of India. The Supreme Court would not interfere because, again, it is a policy. But this man had to interfere and correct the policies of the Government with limited success. This man cannot go on doing the real duty of the Supreme Court. Some one must take up this responsibility. The new imaginary super body also could go the way the Supreme Court. Even the National Human Rights Commission would not be helpful. The option, apparently, is asking the people to write like this to the President, CBI, NHRC, Chief Ministers, Members of Parliament and others. A better option is to share this knowledge with children. They would save India from the hands of those responsible for the manipulations.

            The former Minister for Petroleum said that he was divested of the Petroleum portfolio quite unjustly. He would like to reveal the real manipulators mainly to dispel the darkness surrounding him. But, the media mafia would not allow him to disclose his mind. Obviously, the truth about the functioning of the Petroleum Ministry would not come out easily.

            In view of the new revelations, the facts from 6 February 2006 to 26 February 2006 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India today i.e. on 27 February 2006 through email.

 

V.SABARIMUTHU


64

 

THE REWARD    

           

 

 

The extremist people on 27 February, 2006 killed 50 people- mostly tribal people returning from a protest march against extremism- by triggering a land mine in the Chattisgarh State. The public sector TV Channel considered this incident as a trivial matter concerning the tribal people. The other media mafias did not report it properly. In fact, there were no mourners.

The Union Budget for 2006- 2007 was presented on 28 February, 2006. The budget was out and out consistent with some points present in the 52 letters and in the associated facts. The Minister did not utter even a word about privatization. There was no word about the question of selling the shares of any Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) with or without introducing any reservation scheme. The Service Tax rate was increased from 10 per cent to 12 per cent. The ATMs were brought under the Service Tax net. Several other new services were also included in the list although it was not clear whether the Courier services were included or not. The lending rates to farmers were brought down to the maximum deposit rate of 7 percent. There was a scheme to return 2% interest collected from them. The excise duties on several items were decreased to make the products competitive. The old age pension was deepened. The mid-day meal scheme for the school children was strengthened. A novel scheme in the Budget was the decision of the Government to give Re.3000/- to every girl studying in Standard VIII in the form of five year fixed deposit. The Union Minister concluded his budget speech by quoting from Swami Vivekananda: “We reap what we sow. We are the makers of our own fate…. We make our own destiny”. 

With regard to the increase in the old age pension it must be stated that the Union Government could have widened it.

The Government could have extended Transaction Tax to Saving Accounts after creating a consensus among political parties. However, bringing the ATMs under the Service Tax net had the effect of collecting a small amount as Transaction Tax from saving accounts. It was a clever decision. However, later the Minister said that it was applicable to third parties only.

There is a touch of humanity in the Re. 3000 scheme for girls. This is similar to the one introduced by a Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, in his State long ago. In the latter scheme, every girl that passed Standard VIII would get Re.10,000/- at the time of her marriage.

With regard to the above financial assistance for girls, it may be mentioned that the Union Government could have given 20 or 25 gram of gold to every girl as soon she passes Standard VIII. This is because the girls in India love gold. This gold would give a lot of hope and confidence to them. Those who cannot afford to buy it would cherish it very deeply. They could pledge it, if necessary.  They would think that the Nation, after all, loves them. However, if this view were not feasible of compliance, the Government could give 4 gram of gold at present. This will be sufficient to make a ring. On the other hand, under the present scheme, a girl would get only 3 gram of gold that too after five years - assuming that the price of gold would be Re.1500 per gram after five years. Thus the present scheme is a tantalizing one. In fact, the proposal gives the impression that the Government is introducing a very good scheme with some other purpose in mind.

The Government could have given adequate importance to housing for the below- poverty- line people.

After going through the Budget speech, this writer really felt that the Government was implementing the aspirations of the common man. For a moment it appeared like a “dream budget”.

However, in the next moment it appeared that the Finance Minister did not disclose anything about the most important middle portion. This is because he did not utter a word about the question of using surplus money in the financial institutions and the PSUs for public investments. There was no word about the money in the Provident Fund and Pension Fund also. It remains as a great disappointment. In fact, it is the greatest secret of the Budget.

It may be recalled that when this writer sent his first ten suggestions to the former Prime Minister of India on 1 June, 2001, he initiated a great debate in good faith. It must be noted that no country would have debated so intensely on a - one page - ten point- letter from its citizen. After five months of very active discussion, the former Prime Minister went a few jumps ahead of this writer and announced the decision of the Government to use the surplus deposits in the banks for large-scale public investments. The Prime Minister asked the private companies to ride on the back of higher public investments. However, within days the stakes demonstrated their muscle power by overruling the decision. This act of superseding continues to remain as the greatest misfortune of Indians.

Now, the Government could remove not less than Re.three lakh crore from the public sector financial institutions as loan in this year alone. With this amount, all National Highways could be converted into four lane roads at the rate of 100 Kilometre per day. All important railway lines could be doubled. Not less than10 pollution free refineries could be started. Equal number of power plants could be made operational. All major airports could be modernized. Two or three new ports could be developed. The public sector Steel Authority of India (SAIL) could be asked to extract the iron ore that otherwise would go to others. 25 Medical Colleges could be started. Equal number of Engineering Colleges could be added. Consequently there would be a tremendous improvement in the economic activity all over India. Several job opportunities would appear. The unemployment problem of the unorganized workers would disappear Thousands of rich men would be created.  Consistent with the development, foreign investments would increase. The revenue of the Government would swell. Extremism would tend to disappear. UNITY of the Nation would be strengthened -all within a span of two years.

 Alternatively, the Government could start 25 Construction Corporations in different States and the financial institutions could be asked to lend money to them. These Corporations could do everything the Government otherwise wants to do on BOT basis. Another method is asking the financial institutions to buy the shares of these Corporations. In this way public money could be used for public investments.

In the event of accepting these suggestions, the media mafias would construct several stories to destabilize the Government. Trivial matters would come out as big news. Dissent by village level leaders would become headline news. Naturally, a few coalition partners would part with the UPA Government citing some other reasons. The stability of the Government might become a question mark. Though the system has sufficient internal energy to overcome it, nothing could be predicted. This might be considered as the adverse side effect of the above policy.  

In contrast, if the deposits were handed over to private parties either as loan or in the name buying their shares, they would construct gigantic refineries, ports, airports, highways and super ways. Everything in India would appear as the private assets of a few manipulators.  Besides, they would very gladly buy assets all over the world. The beneficiaries would deny freedom of expression and democracy to 1000 million people. They would even deny the people the bare means of decent living. The hard earned money of the people of Kerala would disappear from their land and appear in South Africa and South America as private property. If this flight of capital were not curtailed, the people of Kerala would examine the reason why they must remain with the Indian Union. In fact, they would see no clear picture before them for development. This would lead to extremism. Military and paramilitary forces would have to be used against the boys just to canalize the money in the hands of a few manipulators. This would undermine the UNITY present in the Constitution of India. The Nation would tend to wither away. Therefore, this policy is an unconstitutional one.

Thus the crucial question before the Union Cabinet is whether the Government must utilize the public deposits in the financial institutions for public investments or private investments. However, if they wanted to hand over the deposits in the financial institutions to a few individuals as at present, the Union Cabinet could consider whether there must be a ceiling- consistent with the Constitution of India- for the amount that could be withdrawn from the financial institutions by different companies. They could also determine whether the loan must be equitably disbursed all over India for the benefit of their own children or not.

Further, with regard to the Budget, it must be stated that the Government was silent about the policy of bulk buying. Furthermore, there is a growing tendency to award contract works to one or two individuals or companies reducing the local contractors into mere slaves. The Government could have hinted a remedy for it also. He could have opened his mind about the question of transferring the BSNL, LIC and some other Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) in the hands of the State Governments to contain militancy. He could have conveyed his views about the question of apportioning the shares of other PSUs among various States to control flight of capital on one hand and to fight extremism on the other. Above all, there was no plan to restore the illegally privatized PSUs. Viewed in this context, the Union Minister, through his silence, denied the right of the people to “make their own destiny”.

The Government would never say that these were abstract and pompous ideas. Many countries struggle to cope with the present day problems because of lack of ideas. In India, there are plenty of ideas. But seldom the ordinary people accept the ideas and change the status quo. Even a “Peer Team” specially trained to assess individuals ridiculed the suggestion of this man to impose Transaction Tax as layman’s idea and undervalued its usefulness. But, the political leaders could understand its significance. They implemented them because the political leaders change the status quo more readily than the intelligentsia. Everyone could now see the rewards of such changes. The condition in 2001 was such that even soldiers were not paid immediately after recruitment. Hereafter such things would not happen. Therefore, there is no doubt that the present Union Cabinet would act rightly if these views were presented before it in the right way. The Cabinet Ministers would never abdicate their power under the stress of the editors, manipulators and the conspirators. Aristotle says those who act rightly are ones who get the rewards and good things in life.

In this connection, it must be reiterated that the suggestion of this man to impose Service Tax in 2001 and his persistent demand to impose Transaction Tax - partly to relieve the employees from the unbearable Income Tax burden and partly to increase the revenue- rescued India from a grave fiscal crisis and saved many PSUs. These suggestions made the work of the Government that much easier. If a boy takes 50 runs and three wickets in cricket, he gets not less than Re.10 lakh. If a citizen of India –X, Y or Z- gives some easily implement able suggestions to collect one lakh crore as tax without creating any heartburn to anyone; he could be given Re. 100 crore as reward. At least 10 crore could be given without any hesitation. The only condition is that it should be given through a Competent Committee or with the consent of the Parliament to eliminate arbitrary decisions. If given, all people would understand the value of his work and recognize his work. His children would agree that their father did not waste his time, energy and money foolishly. The people would accept that such writers, including the college teachers, after all, were not a liability to the society. This would exhort others to come out with concrete suggestions to solve the problems of the 1000 million people. If it were not done, such people would become the butt of the society.

Further, if the contributions of a man promote peace, is it not the demand of democracy to recognize it? It is the demand of democracy that the President and the Prime Minister must share the good knowledge available to them by virtue of their position with the people. Then only the people will be able to judge whether their representatives “endeavoured to widen their scope of knowledge in the light of the needs of their country and the perpetual good of their loving subjects”. In the words of the President of India, the leaders should work for the creation of a “knowledge society”. But, the President and the Prime Minister now vie with each other to wrap the knowledge before them. This is not to belittle the service they have done so far at all. This is only to complement their service. Viewed in this context, the so-called Freedom of Information Act seeks to deny even this bare knowledge to the people.

Though it is digression, it must be noted that this writer sent his book in Inorganic Chemistry to His Excellency the President of India. Any one would agree that a simple revision would have made it a wonderful one. When the English version of Indulekha- the first novel in Malayalam by O.Chandu Menon- came out in 1893, Queen Victoria issued a certificate to Chandu Menon in “recognition of the services rendered by him to the cause of Malayalam literature”. Now, in India some men for some strange reasons do not get any open recognition from the President of India. It is clear that several men in India appear from nowhere –do some incredible work- and disappear to nowhere like the “mad Chanan’ in the Mrthandavarma Novel without the notice of the Nation. The poor county is poorer to that extent.

Coming back, President of the USA came to India on 28 February, 2006. Ignoring the protocol, the Prime Minister of India went to the airport to welcome him. This is consistent with the letter No.45 dated 8-12-2004. The Government might have done it even without that letter is another matter. The Prime Minister of India and all those who wield power in India must be commended for changing the protocol. It is not for getting some benefit from the USA at all although India might be benefited immensely automatically. Institutional memory is very important for any Nation.

The President of India made an excellent but memorable banquet speech replete with the choicest words. It was a unique one. Not all men could do it. The people all over the world might have noticed it through their TV. For the first time, the people might have realized that the present President of India is cut out for the job. No wonder that the President of the USA openly said that he did not get such a reception anywhere in the world.

During the bilateral talks, India agreed to place 65% of its reactors under the IAEA safeguards. The rest of the reactors would not be open to international inspection. The separation would be completed by 2014. The USA in turn would lift all sanctions against India and supply fuel to the reactors. Besides, the USA would strengthen the economic relationship with India through trade and industry. Now the Left parties in India supported the agreement.

During his stay in India, the President of the USA described India and the USA as brothers in the cause of human liberty. He said that Indian leadership was needed in a world hungry for democracy. He asked everyone to stand by reformers and dissidents.

 With regard to business, he said that India needed more transparency.

Referring to the food assistance given to India in 1960s, he said that the USA would help India to achieve second green revolution. He added that India and the USA were closer than ever before.

He commended India for establishing rule of law.

Finally, he said that he came to India for “friendship”.

Incidentally, it may be pointed that the King Marthanda Varma as early as in1758- while in dead-bed - advised his successor to maintain “friendship” with all the then known foreign countries for the development of Travancore. Maintaining good relationship with other countries is vital for the development of India.

After reaching Pakistan, the President of the USA refused to supply fuel to its reactors saying both the countries had different needs and histories.

The Prime Minister of China, Mr.Wen Jiabao, informed the National People’s Congress on 5 March, 2006 that a new socialist countryside would be created. In order to achieve it, China affected a seven-fold increase in spending in rural health care. Similar importance was given to education. He said that China would “increase its capacity for innovation and leapfrog advances in key areas of science and technology”.

As the Parliament is in session, the facts from 27 February, 2006 to 5 March, 2006 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India on 6 March, 2006 through email.

 

 

V.SABARIMUTHU


65

 

 

JUDGING THE JUDGES

 

       

       A private Company was listed in the Mumbay Stock Exchange on 6 March, 2006. The promoter rang the ceremonial bell at 9.54 A.M. Instantaneously, one crore shares of the company were sold. About Re.11250 to Re.13500 crore were collected. This gave the impression that the Indians were floating over an ocean of money. The media mafia did not say with which money the people bought the shares or from where the money came from. Whose money is this? Common man believes that the money would not have reached Mumbai without the help of the Union Government or someone in Delhi.

On 8 March, 2006 a political leader said that the Government would become bankrupt very soon. He disclosed that the primary market purchases in 2004 were Re.35,859 crore and they fell to Re. 30,391 crore in 2005. His statement gave the impression that the people would not have purchased the entire shares of the above company. On the same day, there was a report that the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) purchased 2.2 percent shares of another “auto company” for Re. 153 crore. These developments now give the feeling that the financial institutions, particularly the nationalized banks and the LIC, have been buying the shares of the companies or advancing money to buy the shares based on the arbitrary orders from Delhi. It is now clear that the small unconstitutional buying and selling of shares,  going on in India were only preliminaries to an invasion of the entire money of the LIC in one go.

When the financial institutions buy the shares of companies, how will the people buy the shares? Does the system expect the people to compete with the financial institutions? When the present Prime Minister dares to give Re.10000 crore to a boy, will not another man get ready to give Re. 100,000 crore to his brother? Again, when a boy gets Re.10000 crore from the Prime Minister of India, will not the recipient trigger a crash to the Stock Market to buy back his shares and the shares of all others? The present outgo of public money into the pocket of some individuals shows that the discomfiture of the Prime Minister of India in the Re.5000 crore episode quieted him for a time only. In fact, none in India would have apprehended fresh outbreaks of manipulations like this.

The Government would say that the system is acting in good faith to save the private companies. The Government would even say that it is not a denial but an assertion of democracy that Government is being blessed with the powers to give Re.thousands of crore to some companies or individuals. Alternatively, the Government would say that the Union Cabinet is taking all the decisions. But the system should not tell the people that a few big companies are entitled to special treatment in India. The system should not misuse its power simply because the people are too weak to give any trouble to it either.

If the decision to buy the shares of the above Company were taken by the Union Cabinet after due debate, it would go down as an unconstitutional breach of trust. However, if the money had been released due to the influence of the Prime Minister of India, even the children in India would consider this as an act of corruption by the Prime Minister of India. Therefore, it must be reluctantly said that the Prime Minister of India is liable for prosecution.

The Prime Minister of India recently said that the longevity of the Union Government is a function of the ability of the Prime Minister to rule India. If it were true, the former Prime Minister would not have abdicated power at all. As he could not digest the manipulations, he honestly decided to relinquish power.

Therefore, one must rule India honestly without any cause for the people to regret. This is the important criterion. None shall think that the former Prime Minister of India made it possible for the present Prime Minister to enjoy power because of his weakness. Instead, it was his strength that he loved reason. It was his strong point that he did not want to be a party to the ever-increasing manipulations. It was his power that he did not want to add more and more dark pages to the history of India. Therefore, the present Prime Minister shall not allow the financial institutions to buy or advance money to buy the shares of private companies just to cling to power.

The tendency to ignore the work of others is fast becoming the trait of Indians. Hundreds of so-called “Peer Teams” are functioning in India to assess the “Quality & Excellence” of individuals and institutions. These teams comprise erudite persons occupying responsible positions. However, due to some strange reasons they slight individuals and institutions with concrete contributions to the society and to various disciplines. Their attitude is: “If you do something, what is that to us?” Instead of unearthing the contributions of individuals and institutions for the benefit of 1000 million people, they simply suppress them and with that satisfaction they continue in their work. When the intelligentsias act like this, it is natural that the Prime Minister would be reluctant to accept some crucial suggestions of the people.

The suggestion to restrain the financial institutions from investing in shares was given to the former Prime Minister of India as early as on 1-6-2001. It is not a new suggestion to place a constraint on the present Prime Minister of India at all. It is not to test his patriotism either. The Prime Minister of India cannot ignore it because the act of giving money like this to selected private parties extinguishes the Constitution of India. Therefore, the Prime Minister of India should not be a person to slight the most important suggestion of a citizen of India.

It appears that the manipulations are going on with the collaboration of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Prime Minister. Now -a –days the media mafias do not report the words of the Members of Parliament. Therefore, the people do not know what the Members of Parliament talk at all. However, a Member of Parliament in 2001 said that the cost of acquisition for the UTI in Zee Telefilms Company was Re. 861.79 but its market value was Re 162.91. Similarly, he said that in Himachal Futuristic Company, the cost of acquisitions of the UTI was Re.1067.34 crore but the market value fell to 127.58 within one month. According to a complaint lodged by another Member of Parliament, a private company collected Re.934 crore in March 1994 but it diverted Re. 789 crore to the stock market. Obviously, the then Government misused its official position. The CBI might have given full information about the fate of such manipulations to the President. These manipulations must be fresh in the mind of the Prime Minister of India also. Yet - the people suspect - the Prime Minister has given Re. thousands of crore to buy the shares of the private company.

Therefore, the Prime Minister must put an end to the long tale of manipulations that are being committed by the lawless band of conspirators, who have been molesting the land for the last three decades through the aid of the stock exchange, media mafias and chosen men in the Government, bureaucracy and judiciary. It is the duty of the Prime Minister to recover the money given to the private parties in the name of buying the shares without wasting time. The system must also take back all illegally privatized PSUs. It is the right of the people. All financial institutions excluding the Unit Trust of India (UTI) must be forbidden from investing in shares even Re.1/-. This is to save the Nation by restoring constitutionalism.

On 7 March, 2007 bomb blast killed 20 people at Sankat Mochan temple in Varanasi. The Parliament condemned the heinous act and observed one-minute silence.

The Supreme Court on 7 March, 2006 held that the sale of the surplus land by the public sector National Textile Corporation (NTC) legal. Thus a Supreme Court Bench set aside the recent Bombay High Court judgement in record time.

A two judge Supreme Court Bench on 8 March, 2006 sentenced a key witness in a case to one year imprisonment because she refuted her own statement- that she saw the killings of her own members of the family. Many people felt that she was a victim caught between the devil and the deep sea. It must be noted that the learned judges of the Supreme Court knew that a man bought a PSU using the money taken from the Bank of India - another PSU. The learned judges knew that he is not a poor man. In other words, they were a witness to the unconstitutional deal. Yet, they are not disclosing this to anyone. How will the people judge the learned judges of the Supreme Court?

There are 793 billionaires in the 2006 Forbes billionaires list. Mr. Bill Gates leads the list with $50 billion.  However, an Indian businessman must be the richest person in the world, if the net asset value were the criterion.

The Chairman of the public sector State Bank of India (SBI) on 10 March, 2006 said that his bank would buy a loss-making bank in Bangladesh. He, further, said that his bank would raise about Re. 3000 -  4000 crore through public issue in the next year for expansion in overseas market. In this connection, it must be noted that if the SBI were in need of money for buying banks abroad, it could sell the shares of the private companies it is holding. Instead, the SBI is buying the shares of a private company, say “x”, with one hand and is selling its own shares to “x” with the other hand. As the people fail to understand the economics behind it, they consider this as manipulation and arbitrage trading. The Prime Minister could explain the economics behind it but he would not. The President of India also could issue a clarification but he too is not likely to do anything.

A Union Minister, in the meantime, said that there were surplus funds at the disposal of the Government due to increased tax collections.

A conference of the Chief Ministers and Chief Justices were held in Delhi on 11 March, 2006.In his keynote address, the Chief Justice of India said that the witness turning hostile was nothing new. He wanted to overcome this problem by completing the trial within a specified period. He said that something must be done to overhaul the process of criminal justice system in India. He added that there would be zero tolerance to corruption in judiciary.

 Inaugurating the above conference, the Prime Minister of India said that the witnesses turning hostile or changing their evidence was causing concern to ever increasing sections of society. He, further, said that corruption had surfaced in the judiciary. He wanted the judiciary to tackle it.

It must be pointed out that the President of India should have presided over the above conference. But he was in Mauritius at that time. In other words, the President of India was discharging the usual duties of the Prime Minister of India and vice versa. Apparently, the President of India is an obstacle to the manipulations. In fact, the President of India would not be a person to destroy the Presidential Palace in the hope of the prize within. However, the present unconstitutional manipulations show that the President of India is not acquitting himself well his constitutional responsibilities.

Justifying the US nuclear deal with India, Ms. Conddoleezza Rice, the US Secretary of State, in an article supplied to Washington Post and The New Indian Express on 14 March 2006, among other things, said that the Government of India functions transparently and accountably.

In view of the new developments, the facts from 6 March, 2006 to 15 March, 2006 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India on 15 March, 2006 at 9.30 P.M. through email. The same email, as usual, was sent to the CBI, National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) and a few Chief Ministers.

 

V.SABARIMUTHU


66

THE UNITY

 

       The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs met on 16 March, 2006 presumably to discuss the email sent to his Excellency the President of India on the previous day. It appeared that the Government decided to take some actions to curtail financial manipulations. After the meeting, a Union Minister appeared on the TV and said that the Government would start 11 Medical Colleges in various States. The newspapers reported that the Government would revive the 20-point programme of Mrs. Indira Gandhi with an eye on regaining the pro poor image.

            A private company on 16 March, 2006 disclosed that its Master Gain scheme had mopped up Re 5,700 crore and would invest the funds in 100 Indian companies.

            In this connection, it must be stated that the collection of Re. 5700 crore immediately after the collection of over Re. 10,000 crore from the public sector banks was an unexpected annexation of public money by a private company.

How did this money go to Mumbai? The people believe that this money would not have gone to Mumbai without the help of the Prime Minister or the Union Government. However, the fresh outbreak of manipulations indicates that a “Super Cabinet” that worked during the period of the NDA Government is very active even now.

It is pertinent to recall that when the first letter dated 1-6-2001 was sent; the then Prime Minister of India halted the privatization programme. This generated a heated discussion in the Parliament. The members of all political parties criticized the corporate houses in one way or other.

At that time, the media brigands also quite unwittingly disclosed certain truths about themselves. Thus on 1 August, 2001 a newspaper said that the UTI took many bad investment decisions under pressure from Delhi.  Another newspaper on 23 July, 2001 disclosed that an officer in the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) was thrown out  because he wanted to file a criminal case against a private company.

Anyone could note that though the CBI arrested the then Chairman of the UTI, for depriving the money of over two million people, nothing came out of it. The Union Government gave more than Re.30,000 crore as bail out package to the UTI later is another matter.

Now the private company and some other mutual funds with unlimited money at their disposal would trigger a crash to the stock market to buy the shares at lower prices. They would then identify companies with floating stocks and maintain large concentrated trading positions in select shares. The media mafias would come out with editorials and articles to create an impression of market interests in these shares. While increasing or maintaining prices of select shares, they would offload them selectively to book huge profits and take further positions to increase the profits. Under the pressure from Delhi the nationalized banks and the LIC would be asked to buy these select shares to complement their manipulations. The public sector banks and other PSUs would be asked to disinvest part of their equities in the name of asset creation.

 The effect of such resonance and synergy cannot be simply envisaged. The money would be diverted to many other fields including real estate with devastating effects. The profits would disappear into foreign countries. Another part would be used to deny democracy to Indians as at present. Some amount would reappear as Foreign Institutional Investors (FII), all with the help of the Union Government, judiciary, bureaucracy, investigation agencies and other resources.

A newspaper on 11 May, 2002 said that the turnover of a private company came merely by trading in the shares of its own companies and selling them to other group companies at artificially high prices. Thus the shares were bought for Re.10/- and sold for Re.300/- There are several ingenious ways to defeat all regulations. For instance, a boy manipulated the stock exchange with borrowed money. Now another boy has removed Re.16000 crore! This is more than the annual revenue of many States in India. What all a boy could do in India with the help of the Prime Minister of India, as his Protector cannot be imagined by anyone other than the present Prime Minister of India himself. In fact, about eight powerful houses are manipulating the Union Government in one-way or other. 

Usually, an employee receiving Re.1000/- as bribe or removing Re.1000/- from the bank is dismissed from service.  Anyone caught in a small theft or malpractice cannot survive in India. Those manipulating a small amount of public money also cannot run away. Even the Members of Parliament cannot escape. The noted political leaders would be processed like anything. But a Member of Parliament had said that a private company had looted the UTI and made it bankrupt. But the present system has enabled the same company to collect about Re. 16000 crore within a span of one week through two different ways.

            The Prime Minister would say that he enabled a boy and a few others to collect money like this only in public interest. He would say that the Government should not stand in their entire path. The Prime Minister would say that the said company would have collapsed on its own but for this help. He would even say that he is ensuring stability to his Government by paying tributes like this. But, everyone must note that even in the USA, the people must spend a definite part of their income in the state to which they belong.  Therefore, it is imperative the people must spend their money in their own States to prevent flight of capital and to curtail economic deprivation. In fact, the act of allowing some boys to collect money like this undermines the UNITY present in the Constitution of India. Therefore, it is out and out unconstitutional. It is like allowing someone to levy tribute from the people to remain in power. It is clear that the system utilizes military against the boys in Assam just to levy tribute on them like this.

 

It must be noted that a present Union Minister moved an adjournment motion in the Parliament on 1 August, 2001 opposing similar manipulations of the NDA Government. When the motion was negated, he created utter chaos in Parliament. Many Members of Parliament supported his stand and said that the corporate houses were exercising awesome powers on the Government. The Finance Minister and the Prime Minister were not allowed to talk. From the way in which he led others in the Parliament, the people believed that he would save the nation from the clutches of the conspirators. Now, the former Prime Minister of India sits in a backbench in the Parliament knowing fully the manipulations going on before him. It is incredible that the above Union Minister has allowed a boy to collect about Re. 16000 crore, sweeping from one end to the other end of India. Even otherwise, is this the purpose of the existence of the Union Cabinet?

Anyone would tell that the words of the Members of Parliament in this matter were very harsh. Is it right on the part of the successive Presidents of India to forget the words of the Members of Parliament? Now, the Indian TV and the other media mafias are not publishing the views of the Members of Parliament because of the knowledge that the people are watching them. Therefore, it is imperative that the banks must be strictly prohibited from buying shares and advancing money to buy shares. This gambling and arbitrage trading are out and out unconstitutional. The money removed from the banks must be recovered immediately. Further, the floating shares of all Public Sector Undertakings should be reserved among various States to give investment opportunities to the people of various States.

At present - consistent with the suggestion of this writer- everyone must pay Service Tax to the LIC premium. The Government could have collected Service Tax for the money paid to Mutual Funds before allowing them to collect money from the public. The President of India alone knows whether the Government did it or not.

It must be noted that the people all over India pay huge amount for partitioning their parental property. It appears that a few people are exempt from this also. Perhaps, due to this observation, the Government later reduced the stamp fee to partition parental properties.

            The Prime Minister of Russia, Mr. Mikhail Fradkov, paid a three-day visit to India and signed seven agreements. One agreement was for the development of Glonass –K navigation satellites jointly between Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) and the Russian Federal Space Agency (ROSCOSMOS). Another agreement provided for the supply of fuel to Tarapur Nuclear Power Station.

            The Union Finance Minister disclosed that Re.16,853 crore worth of non-performing assets of public sector banks had been written off in three years from 2002 to 2005.

            The Union Government on 17 March, 2006 cleared nearly 150 Special Economic Zones (SEZs).

            The newspapers on 17 March, 2006 reported that an Indian company had signed an agreement to acquire Belgium-based Hansen Transmissions International for $565 million. Hansen is one of the largest wind energy and industrial gear box manufacturers in the world.

            In the meantime, the opposition parties alleged that there was huge commission in the multi billion-dollar Scorpene submarine deal with France. A Union Minister ruled out the presence of middlemen. But a leader of the opposition party wanted a probe in the matter. But no one pursued this matter further.

            A newspaper on 20 March, 2006 said through its centre page article that the Union Government had set aside the disinvestments in Public Sector Undertakings. Though the paper attributed it to the Left parties, anyone could discern that it was the repercussion of the email sent to His Excellency the President of India on 15 February, 2006.

            The Prime Minister of Bangladesh, Mrs. Khaleda Zia, came to India on a three-day visit. She was given a ceremonial reception at the Presidential Palace on 21 March, 2006. The purpose of her visit, apparently, was to strengthen bilateral relationship. Everyone in India hopes that Bangladesh does not lose its freedom and the Indians their money.

 In the meantime, the media mafias –in order to keep a Congress leader in the eye of the people- wanted the resignation of that leader from Parliament saying that the leader was holding some offices of profit. A few days earlier the Election Commission had disqualified a Member of Parliament with retrospective effect from July, 2004 for holding an office of profit. The action was based on a petition submitted by a person from the U.P State to the President of India. The media mafias  said that the petitioner belonged to the Congress party. On 23 March, 2006 the Congress leader resigned from the Parliament and later returned after contesting an election.

            Thus the Members of the Parliament are quitting the Parliament one after another either because they are being disqualified or on their own based on some trivial matters. However, the mind that refuses to restore constitutionalism in India must be the real corrupt mind. The mind that conceals 52 letters and the associated facts to plunder the nation must be the most corrupt mind in the universe and that mind is still within the Parliament.

            A Supreme Court Bench on 24 March, 2006 referred to a Constitution Bench a public interest petition challenging the induction of some charge-sheeted persons in the Union Council of Ministers. The Bench said that the court was considering the matter in the context of good governance, purity of the system, equality and public perception, both internally and internationally.

            In this connection, it must be noted that the Supreme Court has been discouraging public interest litigations depicting them as political interest litigation or publicity interest litigation. Further, it is well known that an IPS officer could charge- sheet an Indian citizen residing in the USA in an assault case in India. Further, he could drag the charge-sheeted person to the court for any amount of time -even till the end of his life- without any difficulty. Furthermore, it is a settled fact in law that a person must be presumed innocent till he is proved guilty. Obviously, in this case a judge wants to pronounce a judgement with the help of like-minded judges like this: “Considering everything we have no hesitation to say that no charge- sheeted persons shall be allowed to contest an election”. As the judgement has already been written, the Chief Justice must be prevented from hearing the case lest he would not hesitate to murder the Constitution of India again. A few reasons for this conclusion are given below.

Chief Justice enabled a private company to distribute 5000 petrol pumps just by canceling the petrol pumps granted by the Members of Parliament. The Chief Justice has every right to annul his judgement if the consequences of his judgement were bad. This recently happened in High Court, Delhi. In the parlance of advocates it is called suo motto action. But Chief Justice of India did not bother to rectify the mistake even though this matter was brought to his notice several times through His Excellency the President of India. The people suspect that the learned judges of the Supreme Court would get huge benefits to their kith & kin because of this judgement. Therefore, the Chief Justice of India has forfeited his moral and constitutional right to hear any cases or to constitute any Benches.

Chief Justice knew that an individual bought a valuable PSU utilizing the money taken from Bank of India. On 3 March, 2003, the High Court, Kerala while declaring the oath of an MLA invalid said, “Whenever, there was violation of Constitution, the courts could not be silent spectators. They are under duty to intervene”. But the Chief Justice of India is remaining as a silent spectator in this matter also.

It was pointed out to His Excellency the President of India that the economic policy of the Government shall not be against the Constitution of India. The Chief Justice is not ready to give heed to it.

 There are charge- sheeted Ministers in the Union Cabinet. Therefore, the Chief Justice, apparently, wants to destabilize the present Government.

A former Chief Justice of India and the present Chief Justice are talking in a similar tone. Apparently, they want to do more harm than good to the Constitution of India by preventing the charge- sheeted Ministers from doing their duty.

The present Chief Justice of India was instrumental in destabilizing the UF Government. At that time the court and the CBI destabilized the UF Government. Now, the Court and the Election Commission are playing a similar role.

It must be noted that the HPCL and the BPCL were saved from the clutches of the Supreme Court because the President of India prevented the then Chief Justice of India from hearing the HPCL/BPCL appeal case based on the letters of this writer. Similarly,  in the absence of a reasonable guideline to constitute a Bench, all judges who concurred with the majority opinion in the BALCO case, Minority Institution case, Self Finance Institutions Admission case and the judges who gave dissenting views in the BPCL/HPCL case and Tamil Nadu Employees Dismissal case must be prevented from hearing this case. This is to prevent miscarriage of justice. This is to save the Constitution of India because people fear that there exists a group of powerful stubborn judges to subvert the Constitution of India.

The immediate motive behind constituting the present Bench, apparently, is to enable a boy to enjoy about Re. 16000 crore realized from the banks and the public. They want to divert the attention of the Council of Ministers, Members of Parliament and the people from the dominant theme plaguing the nation. Another important cause is that the Union Cabinet that met on 16 March, 2006 might have decided to bar the banks from buying shares or advancing money to buy shares. This is only a hypothesis. The stakes might have been upset with that decision or similar decisions. Now, the stakes want to accomplish their objective with the help of the Supreme Court, Election Commission, media mafia and the CBI.

Coming back, 13 villagers were killed when the militants triggered a landmine in the Chhattisgarh state on 25 March, 2006.

In view of the mega manipulations and political developments, the facts from 16 March, 2006 to 25 March 2006 are being sent to His Excellency President of India, CBI, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Chairman, Human Rights Commission and a few Chief Ministers through email on 26 March, 2006.

 

 

 


67

 

THE DISCOVERY OF MIND

 

 

         

            Apparently, His Excellency the President of India transmitted the email sent to him on 25 March, 2006 to the Election Commission on the next day itself. All the three members of the Election Commission were in a state of shock and they stopped giving any interview to the media mafia regarding the disqualification matter.

            The President of India might have transmitted the email to the learned judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts also. This is perhaps the reason why the Constitution Bench to destabilize the present Government in the name of charge- sheeted persons has not so far been constituted. If it were true, it would go down as a small wonder.

A Supreme Court Bench taking a decision to constitute a Bench in bad faith and a citizen of India effectively vetoing it cannot but be a wonder. Earlier, the then Chief Justice had abandoned his decision to hear the BPCL/HPCL appeal case based on the letters of this writer. Thus the nature is continuously unfurling opportunities before this writer to do wonder after wonder. However, the Chief Justice still remains in the Supreme Court! The Constitution of India does not protect anyone acting in bad faith. No Government could adopt any policy in bad faith. But, the learned judges, including the present Chief Justice of India, upheld an economic policy adopted in bad faith. Thus the present Chief Justice of India subverted the Constitution of India after playing a dominant role in destabilizing an elected Government.

            The Congress President on 27 March, 2006 declared in a meeting in her Parliamentary constituency that she was committed to fight against all ills prevailing in India. She added that every stone was directed against her.

            The nationalized banks on 28 March, 2006 reported to the Reserve Bank of India that deposit mobilization was lagging behind due to stiff competition from mutual fund industry in resource mobilization. Obviously, it was the repercussion of giving about Re. 30000 crore to a few companies and mutual funds. In fact, the Re.16000 crore given to a boy will be devastating in all directions. There is no mechanism to monitor the whereabouts of the money. This money would not allow anyone to live in India.

            As if it were not sufficient newspapers on 30 March, 2006 condemned that India had excess foreign exchange reserve to the tune of 15 percent of the GDP. The paper wanted the Government to allow the private parties –and not the Government or the PSUs- to buy assets abroad utilizing the excess foreign exchange. The paper moaned that with the red flag over the RBI this demand might not materialize.

 In this connection, it must be noted that the media mafia did not compare the foreign exchange reserve of India with that of China.

The averments of the media mafia are consistent with the prediction that the stakes were keeping an eye on the foreign exchange. Unless otherwise protected, the foreign exchange reserves would vanish into thin air very soon. The Government would, in bad faith, ask the financial institutions to buy the shares of the manipulators. The manipulators would convert the money into foreign exchange, all to the detriment of 1000 million people. 

It is pertinent to note that this writer had submitted to the Government to withdraw all taxes including the Sale Tax over petroleum products so long as the foreign exchange reserve remains over, say, $100 billion. This would make Indian products competitive. The Government has withdrawn the taxes considerably due to the intervention of His Excellency the President of India based on 52 letters. However, there exists some tax components even now. There was a suggestion to freeze the prices of petroleum products also. The only condition is that the prices of petroleum products in India should not lead to any smuggling from India to other countries.

The CBI on 30 March, 2006 arrested four doctors from Chennai in connection with the All India Post Graduate Medical Entrance Examination (AIPGMEE). This confirms the worst fears of the common man that many in India entered Class I Services, IITs, IIMs and others through the backdoor.

On 1 April, 2006 the Prime Minister went to Assam to canvass support for the Congress Party. Exhibiting a secret joy, the Prime Minister said that the Congress Party would eradicate poverty and illiteracy from Assam.

The New Indian Express on 3 April published an article titled “MEDIA IS NO MONSTER”

On 3 April, 2006 the Indian TV channels reported superficially that a private company of another boy would sell its shares to the financial institutions from April 13, 2006 to April 20, 2006. In the parlance of stock market it is called private placement through book building route. A small portion is reserved for the public also.  The President of India knows the truth in this matter. It is another act of corruption. Some people say that the price of a share would fall down to Rs.5/- from the present Rs.56 after three or four years. Some others say the prices would go to over Rs.500/- after three years. In other words, it is nothing but gambling. No Constitution allows any Government to indulge in gambling and arbitrage trading. This is because the Constitution that allows any arbitrary action is not called Constitution at all. It is the paramount duty of the President to restrain the financial institutions from buying the shares

In this connection, it must be noted that the present Government wanted to release money into the stock market as soon as assuming power. However, not withstanding the letters from this writer, the Prime Minister released money into the stock market and fell into a bottomless pit. Now, the Prime Minister is repeating the same mistake, in bad faith, as if his actions were perfectly legal. Thus he had no compunction to give about Rs. 16000 crore to a boy without even ascertaining the real purpose of behind collecting such a huge amount. Repetition of such mistakes would be treason against 1000 million people.

On 3 April, 2006 the employees of the State Bank of India (SBI) started an indefinite strike demanding retirement benefits on par with Government employees. A newspaper on the next day predicted that a win for the employees would affect the prime position of the bank in India. On the other hand, the paper envisaged that a win for the Government would lead to the privatization of the SBI within five years. The strike lasted for six days. The employees practically own the case.

It appeared that the employees were doing a service to the nation because their action might ensure security of service and stability to the employees. It must be noted that a simple extension of the transaction tax to small saving accounts would solve the demands of the employees. In fact, a fraction of this amount would be sufficient to meet their demands.

The Government on 4 April, 2006 handed over the Delhi and Mumbai airports to two strange looking private consortium led by GMR-Fraport and GVK South African airports. As per the agreement, the Airport Authority of India (AAI) would have 26 percent holding. The GMR and GVK will hold the reminder. The future Government would hand over the 26 percent holding to the GMR and GVK or others in one or two phases.

In this connection, the common man cannot mistrust the Union Ministers from the North, South, East, West, Centre and the Congress leaders. There is no reason to believe that these representatives of the people would not have loved REASON. There must be some valid reasons behind the decision. They might have acted in good faith. However, those who stand away from the scene of action would think that the Union Government divested the people of Assam their legitimate share in the Delhi and Mumbai airports. This happened immediately after levying tribute from the people of Assam in the name buying the shares of some companies and mutual funds. Further, the name used for privatization is modernization. This does not inspire confidence. Furthermore, this gives the impression that the Government would not retract from its decision to hand over the mineral wealth of Orissa and other States to Korean Company and others. Therefore, the President of India alone knows whether the present Government acts in good faith or not in these matters.

The only consolation is that the Union Ministers are not giving any company to the Prime Minister of India. This is an unprecedented development. This indicates that the Union Ministers do not repose their faith in the Prime Minister of India. Even in the Parliament, the Prime Minister of India sits in an isolated place like a forlorn man forsaken by all others.

The newspapers on 4 April, 2006 said that $10 billion private investments were needed in the energy sector in the next five-six years. The message was that the Union Government must grant licenses to the private parties to operate nuclear power plants. Naturally, the financial institutions must empty their money to buy their shares. Thus the public money would be converted into private assets as a natural consequence of governance.

A newspaper on 6 April, 2006 said “Judges rule on the basis of law, not on the basis of public opinion”. The paper quoted this from a Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court. This is their answer to the lawlessness of the disloyal judges present in the Supreme Court. The paper in its editorial added that the appointment of judges based on the caste composition would damage the so-called independence of the judiciary.

Now, the media mafia criticized the thinking of the Union Government to extend 27 percent reservation to Other Backward Classes to the IITs and IIMs.

The Congress leader on 6 April, 2006 said that the Government of Assam had no money even for payment of salary to the employees during 2001 and that the Congress Government had changed that condition. She added that with the cooperation of the people, the Congress Party would see steady development in Assam.

On the same day, the Indian TV reported a statement of a former Minister for External Affairs before the Enquiry Commission probing the Volker Committee Report. The commission had clearly asked the media to desist from reporting anything regarding the enquiry. The media has been also blacking out all proceedings of the Commission quite meticulously.

It is disturbing to note that whenever the media mafia criticized the Congress leaders, the manipulators succeeded in plundering public assets. Thus the media mafia criticized a Congress leader during the Volker controversy. Everyone thought that the Congress would retaliate by restoring constitutionalism in India. But some companies in India, during this time, forced the Government to levy tribute from the people of Assam and after a pause went away with a ransom of over Rs. 30,000 crore. Then the media mafia criticized the Congress leaders in the “office of profit” issue. Again, another powerful house divested the people of Assam their legitimate assets by ransacking the airports at Delhi and Mumbai. Now, the Indian TV is insinuating something regarding the Volker Commission. This may be to force the financial institutions to buy the shares of another big company. Alternatively, they would come out with a new story to thwart the attempt of the Government to take back the privatized PSUs. Tomorrow, they would construct still another story and plunder thousands of crore. In fact, there is a direct relation between the criticism mounted against the Congress leaders and the amount extracted by the manipulators. It may be a new finding of this man. But it could be corroborated by the unwarranted attack built against a former Prime Minister of India.

  The peril of today is reminiscent of the situation that prevailed in the Kingdom of Travancore during the period from 1700 to 1728. The people of eight houses became so powerful that they became the virtual rulers of the land. They usurped all powers and the King was constantly in fear of his own life. A reign of terror ensued. Their aim was to extirpate the royal family and establish a republic to be ultimately converted into a monarchy under the rule of one of them. They proposed a Protectorate for this. However, the loyalty of the people to the Prince and a hidden hand exposed the conspirators thereby saving the Kingdom.

In India, around the year 1990, about eight powerful houses became so powerful that they became the virtual rulers of the land. The courts, CBI, Finance Minister of India and the Indian TV began to take orders from them. They robbed the people of their wealth in all possible ways. The UTI became bankrupt. The LIC and the banks handed over their money to them. The United Front (UF) Government emptied the money from financial institutions and the PSUs into their pocket. However, as the Prime Minister of India during the UF rule could not understand the logic behind privatization, they destabilized his Government with the help of the CBI, courts and the media mafia. Then they plundered one PSU after another. Though the intervention by this writer saved many PSUs, they succeeded in establishing a Protectorate in India. The Protector now appears in the Indian TV intermittently to deny economic freedom to Indians, conceal the 52 letters and to protect the manipulators.

Upholding the judgements of the High Court, Delhi a Supreme Court Bench on 7 April, 2006 said that the Other Backward Class (OBC) candidates selected against open quota should not be counted against the quota reserved for the OBCs in Class I services and others. This indicated the weakening of the forces representing the Chief Justice of India in the Supreme Court.

The Prime Minister –the Protector of India- today distributed Excellence in Media Awards to 16 journalists. Though no awards were distributed for concealing the 52 letters and the associated facts, the awards seeks to establish that the 52 letters do not exist in India.

In this connection, the Prime Minister knew that the absence of economic freedom means absence of democracy. Today, a citizen of India must pay Res.30 lakh to private parties to get a petrol pump. Yet, the Prime Minister protects the private parties. It is nothing but denial of economic freedom. The Prime Minister knew that the media mafia is concealing these letters. Yet he wanted the media to be truthful.

Further, the life of a man is all a question of discovering his own mind. Many people might have said it. But it is the view of this writer also. Viewed through this angle, this writer has the immense satisfaction of discovering his own mind by writing 52 letters. Even His Excellency the President of India would agree privately that the History of India since June 1, 2001 is the history of 52 letters and the associated facts. It is disheartening to note that the Prime Minister of India openly distributed 16 prizes to media mafia as if he were oblivious of this truth. Further, a leader of the media mafia- on 8 April 2006 -said  that the strengthening of the present Union Cabinet might lead to another national election in this year. As the life of the Parliament rests in the hands of the media mafia, it is a portent of things to come. Yet, the Prime Minister did not hesitate to distribute the prizes to them.

As the Union Government is levying tribute after tribute from the people, the facts from 26 March 2006 to 11 April 2006 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India, CBI, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Human Rights Commission and a few Chief Ministers  on 12– 4-2006.


68

 

 

THE DARKEST PAGE

 

 

        A Chief Minister’s Conference of the militancy affected 13 States was held in Delhi on 13 April, 2006. Addressing the meeting, the Prime Minister said that militancy must be tackled through effective policing and socio-economic changes. The Indian TV did not show the faces of the Chief Ministers who participated in the meeting. Their views on militancy were also not published.

On 14 April, 2006 some newspapers disclosed that the Government granted permission to the Department of Posts to invest about Re. 10000 crore into the stock markets for better returns. It was an unconstitutional decision. But, there was no further news on this matter.

Some newspapers on 14 April, 2006 reported that the Government of Orissa decided to cancel the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed with five different private sector companies, which planned to set up steel plants in the State. The reason cited was that there had been no progress on the projects. The names of the various companies were not mentioned.

The Congress leader in an election meeting in Kerala said that the Congress party alone would run the country based on consensus avoiding confrontation.

The Initial Public Offer (IPO) of a private petroleum company was subscribed by 51.47 times. 1.9 million people paid this amount.  The quota for qualified institutional buyers was subscribed 68.2 times. The company said that the money exacted would be utilized for the construction of a Re. 27,000 crore refinery in Gujarat State. Thus the money all over India would be siphoned off to Gujarat. This would worsen militancy thereby undermining the UNITY present in the Constitution of India.

The oversubscription to the IPO clearly shows that the Government need not have directed the financial institutions to join the crowd to buy the shares of the company. By allowing the company to exact a ransom of over Re.27000 crore from the financial institutions, the Union Cabinet again levied tribute from the people of India. The President of India, apparently, does not know the reason for directing the financial institutions to buy the shares of the company or the modus operandi of releasing the money.

Obviously, the above company would not deposit the money in the banks and use it for the construction of the refinery. Instead, the money would be diverted in all possible directions. In this connection, the Government would say that the private companies must have sufficient freedom to extract money from all over India. The Government might also say that these companies must be permitted to use the money in any direction. In other words, the Government would refuse to monitor the whereabouts of the money. Ironically, when the extraction of money from the public and the exaction of money from the financial institutions were going on in full swing, the Prime Minister told the people that he wanted economic development with equity. Moreover, he said that economic development should not lead to economic deprivation of any region.

It may be recalled that  a Steel Company at Vijayanagar in Andra Pradesh State collected Re. 26,000 crore through a public issue when the present Prime Minister was functioning as the Finance Minister of India. Within a year its share price came down to less than Rs.2/-. The investors threw away the shares in disgust. What happened to the extracted money is not known to anyone till today. Similarly, during that time, several small investors invested their money in the IPOs of several new companies. Some sold their landed properties to buy the shares. Later, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) de-listed almost all companies for strange reasons. The shares of such companies could be still seen in the houses of some investors. The people endured all the pains. However, the President of India has a duty to take some remedial measures after verifying the veracity of such pieces of information. The President of India has a duty to show to the world that the large mass of data before him is being utilized for the benefit of the 1000 million people.

Incidentally some newspapers criticized the Congress leader on 26 April, 2006. This time they forgot all about the Volker issue. Instead, it was a repetition of the old story namely the residential house of the Congress leader. This is consistent with the hypothesis that there exists a direct relation between the criticism constructed against the Congress leader and the money exacted from financial institutions.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on 23 April, 2006 said that 12.75 percent commission was paid to a company based in the isle of Man (UK) for buying military equipments from South Africa. This is consistent with the hypothesis that many NRIs in the UK owe their wealth to the huge commission received during the bulk buying by India. In fact, India apparently, would buy nothing until a middleman settled in the UK gives his green signal.

Some newspapers on 26 April 2006 reported that a brother of a present Union Minister asked an industrialist to hand over 33 percent shares of one of his companies to his brother. The papers added that the Prime Minister of India had to intrigue for the benefit of the industrialist for a license pending before the above Minister. Further, the papers quite unwittingly, disclosed that the same brother could extract Re.800 crore from the stock market simply by selling 10% of the shares of his Television Company to the financial institutions using the clout of the Union Minister.

      Obviously, the message was that the Prime Minister could protect the interests of the industrialist because he was not related to him. But the Union Minister shall not do the same for his brother. Thus a boy from Mumbai could get a license to distribute 5000 petrol pumps but a boy from Chennai shall not get a license to distribute 50 petrol pumps! Two boys from Mumbai could extract Re.43000 crore but a boy from Chennai shall not extract 800 crore! Similarly, the children should see cricket to cinema and drama in the Indian TV and not the person who contributed so must to the economy, politics and peace. This is the crux of the problem. The political leaders know this but they are helpless!

In this connection, it must be pointed out that a then Union Minister, on May 28, 2002 disclosed that the buyer of a Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) removed Re.1200 crore from it as soon as buying it for about Re.1000 crore!. He described it as “`breach of trust”. It is not the accusation of man in the street. Therefore, it is not possible for the people to reject the allegation as a trivial one. There were reports that the said PSU had to pay about Re.600 crore to a public sector PSU, the BSNL. However, why did the Government privatize the PSU for about Re.1000 core after keeping Rs. 1200 crore within?  Obviously, the privatization of the PSU was out and out unconstitutional. Yet, the new Government did not regain the fallen PSU. Even the President did not deem it necessary to examine the method adopted by the buyer to demolish all the fortifications in the Constitution of India. No wonder, that the buyer is chasing the new Union Minister after destroying all defensive works present in the Constitution.

Further, it is very important to note that about eight powerful houses in India fiercely resist the entry of new companies in the stock market. They want the financial institutions to empty all their money in about 30 companies. Any powerful new entrant would try to take away the money as they do. They are unable to relish this. This is mainly the reason why hundreds of companies were de-listed by the SEBI after 1996. Several companies were de-listed even before imposing any fine on them. At the same time, the SEBI on June 10, 2002 slapped a fine of Rs. 4.7 lakh on a big private company. Yet, it was not de-listed. One would say that the de-listed companies were paper companies only. If it were true, the present stock exchanges and the SEBI must be liquidated. Now, it is imperative that the fate of all de-listed companies must be examined and the reason for not pumping money into them explained. The President –the Sovereign of India- must look into this matter and study the stories of the de-listed companies with all the seriousness they deserve to redress their grievances.

 A newspaper on 30 April, 2006 said that the teachers were not aware of the code of conduct expected of them. The paper deplored that the teachers were “taking pride in defying the system or at best ridiculing, mocking and trivializing any form of disciplined behaviour.”  The paper cautioned that liberal humanist thinking was different from anarchy or chaos. The paper added that the media should not hesitate-at least partially- to own the damage that had done.

Obviously, the newspaper is indirectly referring to the 52 letters before the President of India.

In this connection, it must be stated that this writer did not write the letters without cause.

The publishing houses in India were not ready to give any reasonable royalty to the high utility book in “Inorganic Chemistry” of this writer. When the “American International Publishers”, USA, came forward to publish the book, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) did not grant permission to send a small amount as co-contribution. Then, how will a teacher become rich? How will he fulfill his ambition? So the attention was directed to study the nature of the Indian system. The system was closely followed for five years from 1996. The most probable problems were identified. Then the most probable remedies could be envisaged. However, though one or two letters were sent to different Chief Ministers then, the temptation to send letters to the Prime Minister and the President was resisted.

 The manipulations that took place during the period from 1991-1996 started affecting the nation like anything. The people were falling into a debt trap. The economic activity was declining. The revenues were decreasing. The salaries were pending. The growth rate was plummeting to 2.7 percent. All the right thinking people were in the lowest state of depression as the nation was plunging into a fiscal crisis. There was a strong feeling that the Government was tending to act in bad faith. The media mafia was instigating the idle mass to overtake the working class just to usurp the PSUs. Simply remaining as a silent spectator appeared as crime. Therefore this writer decided to take the pen on 1 June, 2001 to do the present work in a systematic way.

  India underwent a sea change after this day. Service Tax was imposed and a guideline for selling the PSUs was devised. Consistent with the letters of this writer interest rates were brought down and all the loans were rescheduled. This gave a breathing space to all those who borrowed money. The Government could no longer attribute privatization to fiscal deficit because Service Tax brought huge revenue.

 As the Supreme Court could save India, the letters were sent to the learned judges of the Supreme Court. To the utter surprise of this writer, the Supreme Court shifted in a direction so as to annul the effect of the letters. The disloyalty of the Supreme Court to the Constitution of India was shocking. Therefore, the wanton faithlessness of the Supreme Court to the Constitution of India had to be exposed.

 Simultaneously, the sale of the IPCL to a charge- sheeted company was pin pointed. The Re 850 crore deal of the Bank of India”  to enable an individual to buy a PSU was also showed. This crippled the privatization programme. As the manipulations were uncovered one after another, many PSUs could be saved. As the letters kept pace with the degree of illegalities, many other manipulations could be scotched if not extinguished. At the same time, the Supreme Court could be preempted from hearing the BPCL/HPCL privatization appeal case.

As great responsibility rests upon the Members of Parliament, the copies of the emails sent to His Excellency the President of India were periodically sent to them in a random way. The copies of the letters were also sent to various Chief Ministers and important political leaders.

After the advent of the present UPA Government, importance was given to Transaction Tax and the new Government obliged. At the same time, mainly citing the inaction of the Government to restore order, many plans of the conspirators were frustrated. Thus the idea of the stakes to amalgamate the banks was discouraged. The unconstitutional joint ventures with some private parties were also thwarted. Above all, the letters gave an impetus to peace talks. Recently, the Supreme Court could be pre-empted from constituting a Bench to determine the constitutionality of charge-sheeted persons contesting in elections.

The Prime Minister has no hesitation to take the credit for all these developments. But, it is disheartening to note that the pains continue to exist even now. When India got independence Mr. Nehru said that sorrow was over. But, the sorrow is not at all over. Government has not taken any concrete steps to abolish the policy of bulk buying. The Government is not considering the question of awarding the contract works in pieces. Thus, even the construction works of water tanks in villages are being handed over to big companies in bulk.  The question of splitting the LIC, BSNL and some other PSUs  is not engaging the attention of the Government. The Government is ignoring the question of reserving the shares of the big PSUs to various States to give investments opportunities to the people and for the UNITY of the nation.

When the people of Korea prevented some Indian companies from buying Korean companies, the stakes in India prevailed upon the Government to hand over the iron ores in Orissa to a Korean Company. It is not proper and constitutional to hand over the mineral wealth of India just to enable some Indian companies to buy assets in South Korea. Yet, it is happening.  As if the SAIL could not undertake the extraction of iron, a part of the mining works was handed over to a private party in India also.

 Recently, two airports were handed over to private parties citing Olympic Games. This is a new reason hitherto unknown to Indians.

All these decisions are out and out unconstitutional. Yet, the Government is not reconsidering such crucial matters to restore order.

As if such sorrows were not sufficient, the Government is levying tribute from the people in a scale unheard of even during 1991-1996. Thus, the total subscription for a private company was Rs. 1.4 lakh crore! Now, anyone would tell that the Government has fallen into the clutches of a corrupt and rapacious crowd. It is nothing but modern day plunder. Obviously, “The greatest evil is being resorted to as a good”.  The Constitution does not permit anyone to extract more money than a certain maximum from the public. This must be the darkest page in the history of modern India.

Two days earlier, a newspaper had said that several “royalists” in India would support the draconian rule of King Gyanendra in Nepal. The word “royalist” has been used because this writer compared the happening in India with the History of Travancore. Now, the comment of paper needs a clarification.

Only simple words were used in the beginning. Then the constitutional positions had to be mentioned. When the system defied this, the words of the political philosophers like Aristotle, Plato had to be quoted. The works of modern philosophers like C.L.Wayper also came handy. During the course of this journey this writer discerned the close similarity that exists between the History of Travancore and the Modern History of India. It is true that in one or two aspects the modern history of India resembles the histories of some other nations. However, one would fail to distinguish between the History of Travancore and the Modern History of India. For instance, Col. Muntro in 1810 best explained the condition of Travancore in his Report submitted to the Madras Government.

Prince Bala Rama Varma (1798-1810) became the King of Travancore at the early age of sixteen. Extreme youth and inexperience was his worst enemy. The Prince was forced to commit several mistakes. His advisors simply maligned him. His period was known for the corruption and rapacity of public servants. The disloyalty of ministers was also at its zenith. With his death Princess Rani Gouri Lakshmi Bai (1811-1815) became the heir to the throne at the age of twenty. It is said that female sovereigns usually excel everywhere in the art of administration. Truly, she was endowed with remarkable intelligence and judgement. She fully understood her responsibilities of her position as a ruler. Therefore, she requested the Resident Col. Munro to superintend the affairs of the country. Col. Muntro submitted a Report to the Government of Madras. In the Report he said,

“No description can produce an adequate impression of corruption and abuses of the system, full of activity and energy in everything mischievous, oppressive and infamous, but slow and dilatory to effect any purpose of humanity, mercy and justice. This body of public officers, united with each other on fixed principle of combination and natural support, resented a complaint against one of their number, as an attack upon the whole. Their pay was very small, and never issued from the treasury, but supplied from several authorized exactions made by themselves. They offered, on receiving their appointment, large nuzzers to the Rajah, and had afterwards to make presents, on days of public solemnity, that exceeded half of their pay. They realized, in the course of two or three years, large sums of money and were generally subjected to complete confiscation of their property for the benefit of the State. The Raja, therefore, imposed no restraint on their rapacity, aware that their plunder would be transferred to his own treasury. Nor does it appear that this consideration had any effect in checking their extortions; they calculated upon being able to conceal their property during their lives, and felt little concern as to the mode of its disposal after their death. On the part of the people, complaint was useless, redress hopeless; they had only one remedy,  that was bribery. This practice was universal, and it was one of the melancholy circumstances in the situation of the people, that one of the greatest evils was necessarily resorted to as a good, to mitigate the still more intolerable grievances of injustice and oppression. Innocence was protected, justice obtained and right secured by bribes. There was still more efficacious means of injury, and their universal use produced an extraordinary spirit of avarice in the country; for every man endeavoured to have a secret hoard of money, as the best protection of his liberty, property and life”.

The above passage is quoted from Report from Select Committee on the Affairs of the East India Company-Political. Page 276.  The intrigues of the conspirators to conceal the work of this writer would show that the description of Col Muntro fits so well with modern history of India, but with greater intensity. The only difference is that the King could recover the looted money but not the present Government of India.

For still more striking similarities, The New Indian Express could refer “The Travancore State Manual” by V.Nagam Aiya, published by Gazetteers Department, Government of Kerala, 1999. The newspapers could utilize it to prevent the conspirators from invading public assets. All this writer wants is that some others must take up this work.

The newspapers would find that the Kings in Travancore had loved their subjects. If the work of this writer succeeds in preventing large-scale manipulations, the newspapers could, among other things, consider the question of requesting the Union Government to give a small escort to all Kings in India to conserve bio-diversity. The paper could also consider the question of requesting the Government to prefix the names of various Kings after the present names of the schools, colleges and other public building constructed by them. Likewise, there is nothing wrong in naming the new Assembly of Kerala after King Mulam Thirunal because it was he who constituted the first Assembly in the Kingdom of Travancore. This would enable the children to see a glimpse of the past even without actually studying history.

Further, this writer has no command over English. But the English media mafias are lavishly using the words present in this work. They are not only incorporating historical points and quotations in their articles but also even imitating the style of this writer. This is a welcome development.

Coming back, the Taliban in Afganistan killed an Indian engineer working for a private company. Earlier, the Taliban had killed three other Indians working in Afghanistan. As India donated a plane and some other materials to Afghanistan, Indian companies should not be encouraged to bag contract works from Afghanistan. None shall think that India donated the plane to bag contract works.

The militants killed 36 innocent people in two separate incidents in Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) State on 1 May 2006. Three days earlier, the militants had killed 13 innocent people in Chattisgarh State. The Union Government deprives the people of their properties. The militants deprive the people of their lives. None is ready to love REASON in this matter!

The President of India said that efforts should be made to encourage good human beings and enlightened citizens across the world to intervene to contain militancy. Now everyone knows the remedy. However, if any steps were taken to contain militancy or modern day plunder the media mafias would say that such steps would create chaos. A remedy must be found for this.

The newspapers on 2 May, 2006 implored the Union Government to hand over a mining cite in  Jharkhand to help a Non Resident Indian(NRI) company. Alternatively, the paper requested the Government to form an unconstitutional joint venture between the public sector SAIL the NRI. The reason for the attempt made by the previous NDA Government to destroy the SAIL could be discerned. The former Prime Minister did not succumb to the pressure is a different matter.

A newspaper on the same day said that the “Leftwing politicians could be statesmen –or madmen”.

An industrialist demanded the Government to issue a transparent and equitable guideline for spectrum allocation. A newspaper reported it on May 3, 2006. It is a reasonable demand although the method adopted by the industrialist to buy the PSU was neither transparent nor equitable. In fact, it was an out and out unconstitutional method. Therefore, the industrialist must surrender   the vanquished PSUs and prove that his group as the “most respected and ethically most upright industrial group in India”. Further, everyone must start the business with a clean slate giving equal opportunity for everyone.

The Asian Development Bank (ADB) offered $2.65 billion aid to India. There is no dearth for Foreign Exchange. The President of India alone knows the reason for accepting the aid at a time when the stakes want to convert Foreign Exchange into assets abroad. 

In view of the new annexation of public funds, the facts from 12 April, 2006 to 4 May, 2006 are being sent on 4 May, 2006 at 10 P.M.

V.SABARIMUTHU


69

 

REFRACTORY MARAUDER

 

 

       The Union Minister for Company Affairs on 5 May, 2006 said the money collected through public issues would not be diverted to other purposes. One must presume this as a reply to the email sent to His Excellency the President of India on 4 May, 2006.

            In this connection it must be pointed out that an advocate  filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the High Court, Delhi alleging that a private company, “x”, had diverted –in violation of law- Re. 945 crore extended to it by the Unit Trust of India (UTI), Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) General Insurance Corporation of India (GIC). At the same time, according to him, the x retained $1.3 billion External Commercial Borrowing (ECB) in banks abroad since 1995. The High Court on April 16, 2002 directed the Department of Company Affairs to file its Inspection Report against x before May, 2002. Later,  a High Court Bench sought a status report of the case on or before October 30, 2002.. This case later went into oblivion. Now, the x is keeping money in the order of Rs.10,000 crore and is commanding the influence and power which go with it. Evidently, the Minister for Company Affairs, Union Cabinet, President of India or the common man would not be in a position to prevent the diversion of money by  x

The Central Bureau of Investigation, CBI, raided 24 places in six states in a case related to amassing of assets worth Re. 1,400 crore by a former Chief Minister of Haryana.

            Now there were reports that the real estate companies would collect about Re. 20,000 crore through the stock market within six months. The public sector financial institutions would hand over about Re.13,000 crore to a company, “y” and about 2,000 crore to another company. Many others, according to the reports, would be given Re. 300 to 500 crore. Even if the Government did not give the money from the banks, the people would subscribe to it because real estate business is one of the most lucrative businesses in India.

            The common man in India does not get a loan from the banks or the LIC to buy five cent of land. Further, there are several Housing Boards to construct residential houses. Thousands of individuals all over India are engaged in real estate business. The Government is not going to give money to all of them. Giving Re.in thousands of crore to a few individuals in the name of buying their shares that too for real estate business is out and out unconstitutional. They would not allow anyone to live in India. The financial institutions must be restrained from advancing money to buy the shares of any companies including the real estate companies. In fact, the real estate companies should not be listed in the stock exchanges. The decision to give money to the real estate companies in the name of buying their shares and the act of listing them in the stock exchange show that the Government is becoming a refractory marauder of public money.

This writer requested the NDA Government to restrain the financial institutions from advancing money into the stock market through his first letter on 1-6-2001. No other individual would have demanded this. The NDA Government considered the letter in the proper perspective, debated it and directed the banks not to give more than 5% of the credit to brokers. It was a mean position taken by the NDA Government. It was a source of great satisfaction because the NDA Government responded to a letter sent by a common man from a remote corner in India. However, this writer had been describing even this as an unconstitutional decision. Further, it must be noted that the NDA Government did not allow the financial institutions to subscribe to public issues at least to the knowledge of this writer. As a result, the financial institutions had to run after the common people to give loan. In contrast, the present Government is ignoring 52 letters and over 400 pages of associated matters to the detriment of 1000 million people.

When India became independent, Mr. Nehru said, “A new star arises, a star of freedom in the East, a new hope comes into being, and a vision long cherished materializes. May the star never set; and that hope never betrayed”. Now, though some stars are tarrying  in the political sky of India, the Union Government is betraying the hope of the people in cold blood. The Union Ministers from East, West, South, North and Centre are not realizing this. 

            The recent revelations regarding the manipulations of the financial institutions and the stock market are a proof for the unconstitutional rule of the present Government. According to the business dailies, the public own very small portion – in fact, a namesake portion- of the shares of the private companies. The reports contradict the propaganda of the manipulators that a large number of people have been buying the shares of the companies. It is clear that even if the public had bought the shares, the private companies would buy back the shares after causing the share prices to fall. Thus, if the VSNL wanted to buy back the shares, its share prices would remain stagnant for three years or the prices would tend to fall. On the other hand, if it wanted to sell its shares, its share prices would double within six months.    

Obviously, 1000 million people own less than 5% shares of the private companies. Who is holding the shares of the private companies? The promoters and the public sector financial institutions are holding the shares of the private companies. Is there any relation between the share prices and their net asset value? No. There is no relationship between the share prices and the net asset value. Who is directing the public sector financial institutions to buy the shares? Apparently, the Prime Minister of India is doing this work. What is the usual amount released to buy the shares? Apparently, Rs.1000 crore to Rs.100,000 crore to buy the shares of every company. Does the Government buy the shares of all companies? No. The Government buys the shares depending upon the clout of the companies in the Union Government. Does the money go to all regions and States? No, the money does not go to all regions and States.  Is it not an arbitrary decision? Yes, it is an arbitrary decision. Whose money is this? This is nothing but public money. What do the private companies do with the money?  They use the money to deny democracy to 1000 million people. Besides, they use it to buy assets abroad. Some companies use it for real estate business. Some use it to hoard gold. A small portion goes for the erection of refineries or power plants. In fact, the people do not know many of their ways. What will the people of Assam get in return? They would get bullets!

            Another expected revelation was that the people owned less than 5% shares of the Public Sector Undertakings including the ONGC, IOC, NALCO and SBI. To whom did the Government sell the shares? The Government sold the shares to private companies and to a few financial institutions. Thus, while the private companies sold a portion of their shares to the Government at exorbitant price, the Government sold its own shares to the private companies at throw away price. The Government did it in the name of selling the shares to the public. This is the proof for the theory of this writer that the Government is indulging in unconstitutional arbitrage trading.

            On 9 May, 2006 the media mafias reported that an individual running an air service company would come out with an Initial Public Offer (IPO) on 18 May, 2006 to extract Re.4.3 billion selling 24.55 million shares at a price band of Rs.150 –175 rupees a share. This company started operation in 2003. The company said that the money collected through the IPO would be used for debt repayment and infrastructure development.

            Evidently, the first step is getting a license with the help of one or two Ministers in the Union Cabinet. The second step is buying some planes using ill-gotten money or bank money. The third stage is extracting money from the financial institutions in the name of the IPO. A company which has a net worth of about Rs. 1,000 crore would succeed in collecting Re. 10,000 crore merely buy selling 10 % of its shares. This is nothing but day light robbery. They rob this with the help of the Union Government. This is not the way to make the people rich. But this is modern day plunder. This is not the meaning of privatization at all. But this is modern day corruption. This is not earning money through industry. But it is trickery. It is not like buying trucks or planes using bank loan and getting a profit. But it is dividing the assets of the nation among some Union Ministers and some private parties. Tomorrow another company could collect Re.10,000 crore by selling 10% shares of the IPCL, which had been privatized for about Re. 1200 crore just four years ago. Still another company could extract another Re. 10,000 crore by selling 10% shares of the VSNL. The strange looking new company that bought the Delhi airport would exact Re.10,000 crore in name of selling 10% shares of the Delhi airport. Similarly the Korean steel company would exact Re. 10,0000 crore.  A large number of people in India talk in support of privatization. But they are not aware of this manipulation at all.

The decision of the Government to give money to a private Air Service Company in the name of buying its share too is an unconstitutional one. The Government has taken this decision keeping the people in utter darkness. Therefore, the Government is becoming very refractory just to plunder public wealth.

It is pertinent to recall that when the King of Travancore became sick during 1726-1729, the people of eight houses and the petty chieftains became so refractory that they came with armed marauders to plunder the people wholesale. They did not spare even the jewels on the necks of women. As a result, the people of Nanjanad –the southern region of Travancore- in a body fled to the adjoining hills on more than two occasions, complaining bitterly to the king of his effeteness and their own helplessness.

 Now, there is no use in complaining the plight of the people to the Supreme Court because it might not take the letter from a common man seriously. Apparently, the President of India has also lost his power. In fact, it appears that the President has very limited and precarious authority over the Government in the matter of unconstitutional IPOs. If it were true and if the Union Government were to commit modern day plunder like this, all right thinking people will have to flee to the jungles leaving the Government in hands of a few marauding men in the Union Cabinet.

The Union Government has given more than Re.60,000 crore to a few companies in the name of buying their shares since April 2006. The money would deny democracy for ever. None would have imagined that things could go wrong so frightfully. In fact, all the dreams of the people are crashing!

The Union Government has no right to hand over money like this. It is public money. A few boys are keeping it. The money must be immediately recovered. It may be a cry in the wilderness. But the redress of this grievance shall not be hopeless before the President. In fact, he should not have taken so long to restore order in India.  He could have referred the matter to the Supreme Court to protect public money and democracy. The law of the land must triumph one day. 

            On 9 May, 2006 Indian Space Research Organization and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), signed a MoU. According to the MoU, the first unmanned scientific mission of India to the moon, Chandrayaan-1, will carry two American payloads, along with four instruments from the European Space Agency, one from Bulgaria and five from India.

            An Indian private company on 10 May, 2006 decided to invest 1,200 crore in South Africa to set up a 300 MW power plant.           

            The media mafias on 11 May, 2006 criticized the Congress leader for writing a letter to the Prime Minister of India regarding the Free Trade Agreement (FTA). It is a prelude to the impending robbery on 18 May, 2006.

            The President of India on12 May, 2007 requested the media to celebrate every aspect of success in the nation and work towards promotion of a corruption free society, help in creation of enlightened citizens and promote harmony in the nation. He might have talked many things.

            In a written reply in the Parliament, a Union Minister said that the Government had addressed letters to the Chief Justices of High Courts to locate suitable persons from the Bar belonging to SC, ST, OBC and minorities and amongst women for appointment as High Court Judges.

            In the meantime, the Prime Minister of India said that India needed a firm societal commitment to the service of the poorest of the poor. For this he said that his Government must be more transparent and humane, more caring and honest.

            The facts from 5 May 2006 to 14 May 2006 are being sent to His Excellency the President India, CBI, Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC), National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and a few Chief Ministers on 14 –5-2006 at 11.45 A.M.

 

V.SABARIMUTHU


 

70

PLAYING HAVOC

 

The militant people on 15 May, 2006 slit the throat of four persons after abducting them in the Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) State.

Now, the medical students of Delhi started an agitation protesting against the proposed extension of reservation for the Other Backward Communities (OBCs) to the educational institutions. The public sector TV channel also gave wide publicity to it. 25 to 50 percent of the time was allotted for this issue alone in some news bulletins. Naturally, the agitation spread to other areas including Mumbai. Then the doctors in Delhi, Patna and some other places also entered the strike in support of the students. The Supreme Court intervened and asked the students to resume work. They ignored the direction. The Supreme Court threatened to start contempt proceedings. The students again ignored it. Finally, the Supreme Court – fearing that the people might come to know about the plight of the OBCs- beseeched them to call off the strike saying no disciplinary action would be taken against them. The BJP also passed a resolution in support of the reservation. The students and doctors resumed work on 31 May, 2006. The strike lasted for 18 days.

The intensity of the anti reservation agitation was due to the firm conviction of the students that their mark in the entrance examination is an index of their ability. The Indian TV channels did not take any effort to convince the students that a first rank holder in Standard X examination need not get the same rank in his Standard XII examination and that the mark sheet in the entrance examination alone cannot be the sole criterion for judging the ability of students. Further, the students get education out of public funds and that the people of one region or State need not subsidize the education of the students of other regions. Furthermore, Indian TV channels did not explain the plight of the OBC students in India by releasing their proportion in the IITs, NITs, Class I services and others. Above all, they did not explain the students how the disproportionate admission of students in the premier educational institutions would undermine the UNITY presents in the Constitution of India.

In reporting the facts also, the Indian mass media was biased in favour of the anti reservation agitations. In general, the mass media gave more coverage to anti reservation agitations than to pro- reservation activities. For instance, on 16 May, 2006 the students of backward communities took out processions in support of the proposed reservation. The mass media on 16 May, 2006 blacked out this agitation. On the next day, the public sector TV channel showed the pro-reservation procession for a fraction of a second.  This is consistent with the hypothesis that the mass media including the public sector TV channel is under the total control of the conspirators and manipulators.

The Government said that 27% reservation for the OBCs would be implemented with effect from 2007. Government did not choose to justify the decision with convincing reasons. A Member of Parliament requested the Government to give the proportion of the OBC students coming out of the IITs. The Minister simply evaded the question.

It may be recalled that it was the Congress Government (1991-1996) that extended the 27% reservation for the OBCs for the jobs in the LIC. The Government implemented it after appointing 700 officers in the LIC in one go. No recruitment has been made in the LIC in large scale since then.

On 15 May, 2006 the Bombay Stock Exchange Sensitive Index called BSE Sensex shed about 450 points. It shed another 400 points on the next day. But, on 17 May, 2006 the financial institutions intervened and as a result it gained about 350 points. On the next day the BSE Sensex fell by 826 points, the steepest ever fall on a single day trading. Then the share prices moved like a drunkard. On 22 May, 2006 the BSE Sensex fell by another 1111 points and on the next day it recovered by about 350 points. Those interested in buying shares say that the Sensex must come down to 4000 points. However, the media mafias raised a hue and cry. The newspapers warned that the new policies of the Government should not erode the economic progress of the preceding fifteen years. The paper acknowledged that the Prime Minister enjoyed great respect in India and abroad as a great economist and scholar. But, the paper for the first time declared that he committed India to a nuclear deal without a debate in Parliament. The paper said that it did not like the way in which the Prime Minister handled the reservation issue.

It is the trait of the Indian financial institutions to intervene in the stock market. During the period from 1991- 1996 the Congress Government gave the entire money in the financial institutions to the manipulators in Mumbai - in the name of intervening in the stock market-by buying shares. The manipulators, even while removing the money from the banks, pretended that they were opposed to the then Prime Minister of India.  They slashed him like anything.  The then Prime Minister, however, relished the attack. At the same time, they depicted the then Finance Minister and present Prime Minister as an honest and straightforward person striving for the good of the country through his new economic policy. This was the honeymoon period of the manipulators as they amassed the entire money of Indians.

During the period of the UF Government, the manipulations continued unabated. But the manipulators had no rapport with the then Prime Minister of India for still greater manipulations. This was one of the reasons why the manipulators destabilized the UF Government, which ruled India during 1996-1997.

The NDA Government led by the BJP also lavished public funds into the stock market. But, after the first letter addressed to the then Prime Minister on 1 June, 2006, he directed the banks to reserve 5% credit to the brokers. The habit of subscribing to the new IPOs was also apparently controlled. Naturally, the Mumbai sensitive index hovered around 3000 points for over four years. The direct consequence of this was the degree of manipulations decreased and the nation began to prosper. The manipulators did not raise any hue and cry over this but politely asked the Prime Minister to quit office. The Prime Minister obliged and decided to advance the election. This is one of the reasons why the conspirators chose a former Governor of the Reserve Bank of India firstly as the Finance Minister and later as the Prime Minister of India. How the unwanted interventions in the stock market play havoc to the law of the land and subvert democracy in India could be discerned.

Now, anyone would tell that the act of intervening in the stock market is nothing but the devilish plan of the Government to hand over public money in the hands of some boys. It is nothing but inhuman slaughter. Government is making and unmaking conventions and invoking principles - without the knowledge of the people- to suit the needs of the preferred manipulators. The intervention of the financial institutions like the LIC in the stock market is unconstitutional. The intervention pre-empts the investors from buying shares at lower prices. This is one of the reasons why the public is not holding even 5% of the shares of the companies.

The sensitive index must depend on the enthusiasm of the investors to invest money into various companies and not on the amount of money available with the financial institutions. Further, the sensitive index is not an index of the prosperity or otherwise of India or Indians. Even if it were construed as an index of the prosperity of India, money extracted from all over India shall not be emptied in Mumbai. Therefore, the financial institutions other than the UTI must be forbidden from going near the stock market. The Government should not commit modern day corruption by releasing even Re.1/- into the stock market directly or indirectly.

 A Union Minister on 16 May, 2006 declared in Parliament that the Government was thinking of taking back the public sector TVchannel. The public sector TV channel has been utilizing its autonomy to facilitate robbery. It has been utilizing its freedom to deny freedom to all others. It has been remaining as an instrument to deny democracy to Indians. Therefore, according to the Minister; it would lose its present so-called autonomy! 

The South Korean prosecutors on 16 May, 2006 said that the chairman of Hyundai Motor would have to face trial for bribery allegations.

A Commission, constituted by the Union Government, on 16 May, 2006 submitted a scheme for the disbursement of pension to 362 million workers in India. This is consistent with the letters of this writer.

A leader of the BJP from Jharkhand, resigned from the primary membership of the BJP on 17 May, 2006. He resigned his membership in the Parliament also. The media mafias did not report the reason for his resignation.

The CBI Director on 23 May, 2006 said that he was more worried about the corruption within the CBI than in other places.

In this connection, it must be stated that the modern day corruption and the biased actions of the CBI would disturb the mind of anyone.

The CBI charge sheeted a former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu State, for selling the shares of the SPIC causing a loss of Rs. 28.29 crore to the Government. In fact, the CBI went up to the Supreme Court to proceed with the trial in a Special Court. A former civil servant and an industrialist from Tamil Nadu, were also named in the charge- sheet.

In this connection, it must be stated that a leader of the CPI-M party had said that Modern Food worth nearly Re. 2200 crore had been sold to a private company for a paltry Re. 150 crore. This leader is a venerable political leader in India. The people believe his words. The CBI must have either denied the allegation or filed a case against those responsible for the sale.

 The Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu State is responsible for Tamil Nadu and the Prime Minister of India is responsible for India. The Chief Minister as well as the Prime Minister of India committed the same act in the name of a policy. Even otherwise, joint ventures are started only to transfer public asset to private individuals. But the CBI did not approach the Supreme Court to proceed against anyone involved in the Modern Food matter at all.

Further, though the CBI prosecuted an industrialist from Tamil Nadu State, the buyer of Modern Food was not prosecuted. Therefore, in the eye of the CBI, a man from Tamil Nadu is the only industrialist who usurped public property in India. This is consistent with the theory that anyone coming above a certain level from many places would be processed-as for as possible- so that he would not compete with others in the Mumbai Stock Exchange to remove public money. Had the target been the former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, the CBI would not have saved her from far bigger cases.

Now, the conspirators have the satisfaction of finishing the career of an industrialist from Tamil Nadu. According to the CBI, an industrialist from many places could be touched but an industrialist from Mumbai shall not be touched. This is what one sitting away from the scene of action would discern. This would happen to any other industrialists from Kerala, Kashmir or Assam. This is the reason why many places in India are not producing industrialists. This must be the reason why many companies were de-listed from the Mumbai Stock Exchange. This is the reason why the media mafias are chasing a boy from Tamil Nadu State. This is what the money does in India.

 Similarly, the above leader had alleged that the BALCO had been thrown away for 10% of its estimated value of Re. 5500 crore. Neither did the CBI accept the allegation nor did it deny it. Evidently, the CBI did not approach the Supreme Court to take appropriate action in this matter also.

On August 1, 2002, a former Prime Minister of India said that the Hotel Ashoka in Karnataka was sold for a throw away price. This is not an accusation of a common man in the street. But, the CBI did not bother about his words at all and the Hotel is still with a private party.

It is a well-known fact that a former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu State had to surrender before the 1000 million people of India the TANSI land bought from the Government of Tamil Nadu. The former Chief Minister did not violate any law or Act while buying the land. But the former Chief Minister, perhaps unknowingly, violated a very small code of conduct that prohibited public servants from acquiring public assets. Yet, the law of the land triumphed and the property had to be surrendered.

 Similarly, a guideline devised for the privatization of the PSUs prohibited charge sheeted companies from buying the PSUs. Yet, the Union Government sold some PSUs to charge- sheeted companies. So the law of the land demands that such PSUs must be recovered just like the recovery of the TANSI land. In fact, the PSUs should have been taken back, the moment the common man reported the matter to the President of India. The CBI should not expect the political parties to make this demand. It shall not expect the people all over India to demand it. It shall not expect a mass movement for it. It shall not expect the President or the Supreme Court to intervene in this matter. The demand by a common man is sufficient.  However, the CBI has not so far taken any action in this matter.

The Supreme Court Bench on 18 February, 2002 upheld the dismissal of a bank employee for taking Re. 864 through a simple manipulation. The Supreme Court described the manipulation as a serious crime. This writer has been reporting to the President of India that an individual removed about Re. 845 crore from Bank of India to buy a PSU. The individual did not even go to the bank to remove this money. The CBI must have either prosecuted those responsible for the manipulation or denied the allegation. The banks today do not give money to the common man to buy even five cent of land. The banks refuse to give loan to buy a small piece of land even as gratis. But, the CBI is sitting on these papers till today.

During the rule of the UF Government the media mafias said that a then Union Minister had granted a petrol pump to the daughter-in-law of the then Prime Minister of India. The media mafias made it a national issue. She might have got the petrol pump because she was related to a big political leader. However, she might not have got it at the instance of the then Prime Minister. However, one petrol pump was sufficient to destabilize the Union Government. Now, a boy from Mumbai is distributing 5000 petrol pumps! He is distributing it after proving that the Members of Parliament have no right to distribute petrol pumps. This undermines the UNITY of India. Yet, the CBI is remaining quiet.

During the period of the UF Government the CBI disclosed the discovery of Re. 4.5 crore from the residence of a former Union Minister. The discovery was used to destabilize the UF Government. What did the CBI do with the discovered money? None in India knows.

Obviously, the CBI is playing havoc with the law of the land.

These and many more manipulations would disturb the mind of any one. No wonder, the Director, CBI, is talking of the corruption within the CBI. Obviously, a mysterious force in India is preventing the law from taking its own course. Who is representing this force? The Director, CBI, must have a ready reply in hand. He could even examine whether the four Joint Directors appointed in one go to the CBI acquit themselves well in discharging their duties. He could even submit a self-appraisal report to His Excellency the President of India. This would lead to the identification of the person. Then the President of India would not allow him to enter the Presidential Palace, as the President cannot harbour anyone responsible for plundering India’s wealth without even being charge sheeted. In other words, none in India shall be allowed to play havoc with the law of the land.

The present Finance Minister of India put the FDI in India at $ 50 billion. He attributed the credit to the so-called reform introduced by a famous Union Minister in 1991. The Finance Minister also assumed to himself some credit for it although he did not say this in so many words.

The latent message of the Finance Minister is that the Government must possess many essentials to retain this money in India. They are: The Union Government should not restore the illegally privatized PSUs. Ordinary mortals should not enter the stock market. The Government must allow the present manipulators to convert public money into assets abroad. The Government should not ask the POSCO to go back. The extraction of iron should not be given to the Steel Authority of India (SAIL). Airports must be given to the manipulators. The public money in the banks and the LIC must be handed over to them. The public money in the Post Offices must go to them. The Provident Fund also must be given to them. They must be allowed to invest public money in real estate business. Even public property must be sold to them for the same. The financial institutions must buy and sell shares in the capital market based on their dictates. The Government shall not take even a fraction of the public money in the banks and the LIC for public investments. The Government shall not abolish the policy of bulk buying. All contract works must be given to them after eliminating the local contractors by imposing several conditions in the tender notification. All licenses must be handed over to them. Finished products, particularly machineries, must be imported from China to enable the private parties to export iron ore. Even the Members of Parliament shall not distribute petrol pumps. The land ceiling act should not be extended to the lands near the cities and the plantations in the forests. The PSUs like the BSNL should not be split and handed over to the States. There shall be no quota for various States for the seats and assets. Even the percentage of various sections of students coming out of the IITs should not be revealed. Above all, the people must be denied freedom of expression and democracy. The work of this writer must be kept away from the eye of the people. The people of one State shall not know what the Chief Ministers of other States talk. Even the faces of the other Union Ministers shall not be shown in the public sector TV channel frequently. The key Union Ministers, Supreme Court judges and the Director, CBI, must be their nominees. Obviously, the Members of Parliament have no right to alter the status quo and as such they must also be kept in total darkness.

Under these conditions, what would the Members of Parliament do apart from asking one or two questions?

 In fact, service to the manipulators is becoming the law of the land.

Is the President of India incapable of speaking the truth in these circumstances?

A Chief Minister declared in the Assembly that 2 acre of land would be given to the landless people in the State in order to fulfill the assurance given in the election manifesto of his party. Many people did not believe that this promise would materialize. Now, his declaration would have far reaching consequences in the State.

In this connection, it must be stated that had Travancore remained in the hands of the royal family of Travancore for a few more years after independence, the King would have distributed the plantations in his country to the landless people. But, after independence there were none to talk about this matter. The plantations remain as if they belonged to some invisible “Supreme Power”. Now, there is an excellent opportunity to distribute the Government plantations to the plantation workers and others. Even 50 cent of land per family would change the face of the society. The State Government could even extend the land ceiling act to private plantations to fulfill the assurances given in the election manifesto. For this, the Chief Minister must be as kind and royal as the King of Travancore - a tall demand in these days.

A learned judge of the High Court, Madras on 27 May, 2006 exhorted the people to fight for the rights of people. He added that the people repose their faith in the judiciary. The Chief Justice of High Court, Kerala said that service to the people must be the motto of one’s life.

It is now more are less certain that the Government of India has given more than Re. 100,000 crore to some manipulators since January 2006 through the stock market. Before giving this money, the Prime Minister of India exhorted the Chief Ministers in India to work with him to create a more prosperous and more equitable nation. He described the improvement in the lives and livelihood of rural poor as an important element of national integration. He even “urged the Chief Ministers from less developed States to learn from the example of more developed ones and find new pathways of progress for the people of their region”. He asserted that India is an open society and open economy and wanted all those who represent the interest of the people to test and demonstrate their popularity through the institution of Indian democracy.

Anyone going through his above speech – his only famous speech as Prime Minister of India- would tell that the Prime Minister would not have given Re. 100,000 crore to a few manipulators within a span of four months that too under the pretext of buying shares. Therefore, the act of giving Re. 100,000 core is against his theory.

Further, the Government released the above amount in one State. Therefore, the Chief Ministers of other states cannot learn anything from this. If they had learnt anything, they would consider this as treachery. On this ground also the Prime Minister would not have given this amount.

The Prime Minister, furthermore, said that India is an open society and open economy. This also gives the impression that the Prime Minister would not have given this huge amount without taking the Chief Ministers and even the people into confidence.

Above all, as the Prime Minister described India as an open democracy, he must have the nobility of character to publish the key elements in this work. For, if he were blocking it, it would be more heinous than the act of militant people who slit the throat of four innocent people on 15 May, 2006 in the J&K State.

Then, who gave this huge amount? The President of India alone knows the answer.

 What are the consequences of giving this Rs. 100,000 crore?

One day, a present Union Minister had to surrender before a Special Court for Re.42 lakhs disproportionate assets. He was sent to jail. The manipulators - who received Re. 100,000 core now - had gone to the jail to see his plight. It was an officer of the CBI who, apparently, represented the manipulators for this.

On another occasion, he had to surrender before the Special Court along with his wife. Special Court allowed his wife to go home but sent him to jail. In the jail a mobile jammer was placed in his room to cripple his mobile phone. His room had two beds but without mattress. A black and white TV was given to him but it did not function. The food was tasteless. He had to light a bone fire at night to warm him. Even for this only poor quality wood was supplied. According to him, his cheek had swollen as he continued to blow air into it to light it. There might have been a little exaggeration in his statement. But, this is what the money in the hands of the manipulators does.

At one time, the Supreme Court granted him bail. But before reaching his house, the personnel from the CBI had positioned themselves around his house to arrest him again. In fact, the CBI arrested him five times. Finally, the Supreme Court allowed him to roam in the world with the admonition that he should not reveal his trials and tribulations to anyone. This shows that the actions of the CBI emanate from a mysterious force. This is what the recipient of Re.100, 000 crore do with the money.

Now, he has as much power as the Prime Minister of India. In fact, the Prime Minister of India is only the first among the Ministers in the Union Cabinet. He could have requested the Prime Minister of India to prepare an additional Budget for Re.300,000 crore for the speedy development of infrastructure of his State and other States.

Now, the manipulators remove an amount equivalent to the Union Budget from the financial institutions under the pretext of selling shares. They consider it as a prerogative for keeping the Government in place. It is incredible that he has contributed his share to give Re.100,000 crore to a few manipulators who persecuted him in cold blood.

The manipulators would not spend even a fraction of the extracted money for the slated purpose. This is because it would not be remunerative for them to keep the money in the banks. Instead, the major portion would go for real estate business. In fact, the money has already percolated to various States. Thus a man with an income of, say Rs. 25000/- per month would not be able to buy a flat or 5 cent of land in a big city. In fact, there are no places for them even in jungles. One would say that higher land prices would be desirable for those who own lands. However, the increase in land prices is not at all consistent with the increase in salary. In this way the common man is being wiped out of existence. The manipulators, in fact, deny the right of many people to live in India. This is like silting the throat of innocent people.

If the Government were kind to the people, Re. 100,000 crore given to the manipulators should be recovered forthwith. The real estate business in big cities utilizing public money must be banned. Housing Boards must distribute land to landless people, industries and for the construction of flats at reasonable prices. The public properties sold for real estate business in Mumbai and other places should be taken back for similar purposes.

Mr. Kim Woochoong, the founder of Daewoo Group was sentenced on 30 May, 2006 to 10 years in prison for fraud relating to the collapse of the firm under $82 billion debt.

A former Governor of the Reserve Bank of India, on 1 June, 2006 said that India is accepting corruption as an unavoidable part of democracy and governance structures. He said that combating corruption was critical to improving the quality of life of people. The media mafias gave wide publicity to his words. It must be noted that maximum manipulations took place in Mumbai during his stint as the Governor of the Reserve Bank of India. Later, he was made the Governor of a State as a reward. For the same reasons, he is now functioning as the Chairman of Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister.

The security personnel killed three terrorists when they attacked the RSS headquarters in Nagpur.

The facts from 15 May, 2006 to 3 June, 2006 are being sent to His Excellency the President of India on 4 June, 2006 through email.

V.SABARIMUTHU

No comments: