449: THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA: AN OVERTHROWN CONSTITUTION?

449

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA:

AN OVERTHROWN CONSTITUTION?

          Delivering his Law Day address, Madras High Court judge V. Ramasubramonian, on 27 November 2015, said that the Indians must feel proud of having upheld constitutional morality to a great extent.

          It is great that he compares the constitutional morality of India with some others.

          But, does he deceive himself by inferring false conclusions?

          Or, does he deliberately deceive others?

The Supreme Court of India, on 27 November 2015, decided to question former Union Minister Mr. Dayanidhi Maran, through the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The bench comprised justices T.S. Thakur and V. Gopala Gowda.

The court directed Mr. Maran to appear before the CBI for six days starting next Monday to give written answers to the written questions.

At one stage, the counsel for Mr. Maran offered to pay Re. 1.7 crore.

You commit theft and then go and pay? This was the response of the Attorney General, Mr. Rohatgi.

Have you questioned the BSNL officers accused here? This was a question posed by justice Thakur.

The media did not reveal the reply.

The court said that the truth should come to light. It warned that it would consider custodial interrogation in case of suppression.

In this connection, it must be noted that the people allege that an unimaginable amount of public resources are being plundered every day. The court has no interest to know the truth. In fact, it suppresses all such allegations

But the court says that the truth in all small offences like this one should come to light.

A perusal of this work would reveal a pre-existent law for similar cases. Before satisfying that law, the CBI shall not question Mr. Maran.

As there is no Freedom, the court can do anything is a different matter.

On 27 November 2015, Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi said that the Constitution of India is the ‘holy book’ of his government.

The Indians have not experienced freedom.

One day, the court cancelled the petrol outlets sanctioned by the Members of Parliament (MPs) alleging favoritism.

Next day, a private party distributed the petrol outlets all over India. Thus, the private players overthrew the Constitution of India on that day.

After that, some private parties divested  the government of its Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) one after another.

In continuation of the above, they cut the pension benefits of the public servants.

Then they divested Mr. Ramalinga Raju of his Satyam and sent him to jail.

It was followed by the destruction of Nokia- a foreign company.

The 2G and the coal verdicts annihilated the remaining foreign players.

Everything was done to do unconstitutional favours to some private players.

The above players are strong enough to overthrow the learned judges of the Supreme Court of India.

All ‘holy books’ instill the people to stand on one belief or other and not on knowledge.

No wonder that they believe that the Constitution of India gives them Freedom to know men and matters.

Actually, they do not know the facts.

This is letter No.449.

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 30-11- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

30-11---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

448. THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: REJOICING OVER PLUNDER?

448

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

 REJOICING OVER PLUNDER?

          Mr. Sahayam IAS, on 23 November 2015, submitted his probe report on the granite to the Madras High Court.

He put the total loss to the exchequer at Re. 1.06 lakh crore.

He found that the entire machinery of the government besides the political leaders were involved in this matter for over 20 years.

He, apparently, did not reveal the destination of the granite and the whereabouts of the proceeds.

He recommended an investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation(CBI)  to book the culprits.

The poor IAS officer does not know that the CBI is the ‘Cover-up Bureau of India’.

Some supporters of Mr. Sahayam –Mr. Mugilan, Mr.Srinivasan and Mr.Senthil Arumugam- said in Chennai that the loss was Re.30 lakh crore, provided  the rare earth minerals are included. They said that those exploiting the minerals give tribute to the public servants and the political leaders

One might tend to affect a small modification in the calculation.

However, the amount is more than double the Union Budget for 2014- 2015.

The Communist Party of India (M) demanded the government to attach the assets of all involved. Its present stand is a pretended one.

This party –in the past- covertly supported the alienation of the public resources.

 Further, this is an act of corruption that is going on with the knowledge of the Supreme Court of India and the intelligence agencies.

Even if a virgin party comes to power, the court would not allow the government to attach the plundered assets.

It must be noted that the court transmitted an unimaginable amount of public resources to the ruling class.

It is a policy decision. No law demands us to prevent it. The learned judges talked like this until the 2G verdict.

Now, the dominant among the ruled  tend to join the ruling class. They have some newspapers and TV channels to defend their manipulated assets.

An effort, recently, made by the ruling class to block their TV channels failed.

Why does the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) attach our assets? Go and attach the assets of the ruling class. Then look at our assets. If Tata uses the public resources - as his own - to convert England into his colony, why can’t we secretly start some mining works in other countries? After all, it is for the prosperity of India.

If Mr. Vajpayee and Dr. Manmohan Singh could hand over the public resources to their kith and kin retaining their reputation, why can’t we do the same? After all, the people survive by snatching the chains.

Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi transmitted the public resources like this. The recipients make the armed forces of India- and even that of the Super Powers - to stand in attention before him. Are we lesser mortals?  

They would discuss everything like this in their TV channels.

So the Supreme Court of India remains sandwiched by the ruling class and the ruled class.

The court can attach all manipulated assets.

Alternatively, it can spare the assets of the ruling class, and attach the assets of the ruled.

Or promote the dominant among the ruled to the ruling class.

Now, it simply rejoices over plunder.

Is it not the reason for the ‘intolerance’ of the court to this work?

This is letter No.448.

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 26-11- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

26-11---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

447. THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: A JAIL TERM FOR 30 JUDGES?

447

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:

A JAIL TERM FOR 30 JUDGES?

          According to the Global Financial Integrity (GFI), the Indians parked US$ 462 billion in tax heavens between 1948 and 2008. The GFI is a Washington based think-tank. The report appeared on 18 November 2015.

          It is consistent with the revelations of the WikiLeaks. It is also consistent with the resources of India.

          All India Footwear Manufacturers and Retailers Association (AIFMFA) alleged in the High Court, Delhi that foreign money appears through complex corporate structures. Accordingly, Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw directed the government to probe twenty one E-Commerce web sites.

          These things happen with the knowledge of the government and the Supreme Court of India. Therefore, the court should have asked the government whether it has any knowledge about it or not.

          Former Union Minister Subramonia Swamy alleged that a prominent leader of the Congress Party - Mr. Rahul Gandi,- has business interests in England through some shell companies. He wanted a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) or the Directorate of Enforcement (ED). Earlier he alleged that Mr. Rahul Gandhi has a huge amount of black money.

          The allegations are not politics but acts of corruption.

          The Supreme Court of India must have noticed his words. His Excellency the President of India recently said that a letter or an article in the newspapers could be treated as a writ petition.

          Evidently, the court must bring the truth to the knowledge of the people.

          It does not do so.

          He has Re. 44 lakh beyond the known sources of income. Call the army to arrest him. He has Re.200 crore. Send him to jail. He has Re. 6 crore. Question him. This is how the court runs the show.

          The court refuses to go near the big offenders.

          This induces the political leaders and others to siphon off money like this.

          The Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi, on 18 November 2015, addressed the Sixth Global Focal Point on Asset Recovery hosted by the CBI..

On that occasion, he declared that action had been taken to recover black money. He added that a Special Investigation Team had been constituted under the supervision of the Supreme Court of India for this.

This work shows that the judges of the Supreme Court of India are an embodiment of corruption.

Further, he said that significant steps had been taken to check corruption. He disclosed that disciplinary action had been taken against 45 senior officers for unsatisfactory performance. The action included pension cuts and termination from service.

Perhaps, the officers might have wanted to question the learned judges of the Supreme Court. Otherwise, the government might have informed the people as and when the action was taken.

          Furthermore, he said that agreements had been signed with many countries for exchanging real time information on black money.

          He said that a provision had been introduced under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act for restitution of assets. This will enable millions of poor investors – as in the so-called ponzi schemes- to recover a part of their hard earned money

          When the SUS bank in the Tamil Nadu State was closed, thousands of people lost their money. All actions hitherto taken by the government ended in vain. Yet, he talks like this!

          Above all, he said that his government provided a governance structure that is sensitive, transparent and accountable.

          He, in bad faith, conceals this work from the people.          This shows that he has some dark secrets.

          The Seventh Central Pay Commission submitted its report to the government on 19 November 2015. It recommended an overall increase of 23.55 per cent in pay.

          The Government announced only 16 per cent in the Parliament. Apparently, as a result of the intervention by the present man, it increased to the present level.

          Earlier, the UPA government had introduced the grade pay due to similar reasons.

          Now, the government has unlimited money.

It uses the remittances of the hardworking hands for imports. This affects the money circulation. There is virtually no job for the coolies. They suffer in silence. Therefore, this money must be pumped back into the economy forthwith.

The Supreme Court of India must submit an action taken report to the people in this matter.

The five judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India headed by Justice JS. Khehar, on 18 November 2015, revealed that the court received 1450 suggestions from 3500 individuals for the appointment of judges.

These suggestions could be put under, say, five or six rules.

But the Bench did not reveal the suggestions that are reasonable.

Instead, the Bench directed the Government to formulate the draft of Memorandum of Procedure (MoP) for strengthening the Collegium System.

The government, on the next day, refused to obey the order.

Either we decide or you decide. This was the reply of the government. It said that there was nothing in the Constitution for the MoP.

This is the real problem.

There are no laws for the MoP.

There are no laws for selection of judges.

There are no laws for enforcing freedom of expression.

There are no laws for public properties.

What is there in the Constitution?

There are many laws for punishing drivers and conductors!

Further, the reply shows that so long as the selection is an arbitrary one, the government will support the court.

The government wants the court not to devise even any guidelines for selection.

Will the court obey the government?

Or, will the government obey the court?

There are reports that the Odisha State alienated the iron ore present in a region to Tata.

At one time the Supreme Court of India says that the ores come under the Union Government. At another time, it says that they come under the states.

The governments are forbidden from alienating the natural resources. The reasons were given earlier.

The Supreme Court connives at it because it is Tata. But it must do its duty even if the natural resources are alienated to the Almighty.

The Union Government, on 18 November 2015, decided to sell 10 per cent shares each of the public sector Cochin Shipyard Limited and the Coal India Limited (CIL).

          The government, again on the same day, decided to e-auction eight more coal blocks from January 18 to 22 January 2016.

          These are unconstitutional decisions.

Further, these are acts of corruption. The reasons were given earlier.

These are similar to the illegal alienation of the public sector IPCL, VSNL, BALCO and the HZL.

The Supreme Court of India wants to point out the laws that prevent the alienation of public resources.

Therefore, a strong law – similar to the Magna Carta – must be enacted to keep 30 judges of the Supreme Court of India in jail until the restoration of all illegally alienated public resources.

This is letter No.447.

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 23-11- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

23-11---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

446 INDIA AND ENGLAND: GITA AND MAGNA CARTA

446

INDIA AND ENGLAND:

THE GITA AND THE MAGNA CARTA

          The USA introduced the H-1B visa reform Bill in the US Senate on 11 November 2015. The Bill prohibits certain companies from hiring H-1B employees.

          There are reports that this Bill would affect the Indians. 

          Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi paid a visit to the USA recently. He failed to do anything in this matter. Is it an effect of his visit?

          There are reports that Singapore decided to bar its nationals of Indian origin from attending the November 24 public reception for Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi. Those willing to attend must obtain permission from the competent authority.

          Now, it is known that China imposed such restrictions during his visit to China.

          There are reports that many governments do not relish the foreign policy initiatives of Mr. Modi and, therefore,  India.

          This will be followed by restriction on employment and eventual isolation.

          The present man predicted that his visits would recoil on Indians. This was duly communicated to His Excellency the President of India and the Supreme Court of India.

          Neither did they restrain him nor did they allow the people to know such views.

          The children dare to go into the underground in search of employment.

          Why should a prime minister jeopardize their career?

          There exists a rumour that Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi secretly asked a Chinese company to make the statue of Vallabhbhai Patel that is to be installed in Gujarat.

          If true, this would remind the story of the Blue Jackal because he told the people that he wanted to make everything in India.

          Therefore, the prime minister must confirm or deny this.

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) questioned a famous actor, Mr. Shah Rukh Khan, for three hours. The Hindu reported this on 13 November 2015.

The paper did not disclose the charges leveled against him.

The Supreme Court misuses its power in this matter also.  The reasons were given earlier.

          The Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi, paid a visit to England on 12 November 2015.

          He addressed the people of Indian origin at the Wembley Stadium. There were reports that the crowd was sharply short of the targeted 60,000. The artists sang a song titled ‘Made in India’.

          British Prime Minister Mr. David Cameron came out from his 10 Downing Street to receive him. He described the relation between the two sides “as a new dynamic and modern partnership”.

          Mr. Modi planted a sapling at the garden in the Chequers – the British Prime Minister’s residence in London.

          The British and the Indian companies announced new collaborations worth 9 billion pounds.

          Mr. Modi addressed the Parliament of the United Kingdom (UK) on 12 November 2015. He became the first Indian head to do so.

          He addressed the House in fluent English. In fact, he exhibited his proficiency in English. When he concluded his speech there was a loud round of applause.

          At the outset, he said that Prime Minister Mr. Cameron looked relaxed and relieved because the British Parliament was not in session.

          A prime minister must use the Parliament to relax the tension. A little relaxed discussion at the Parliament would do wonders to relieve stress.

          But his words belittled the Members of Parliament.

          Then he said that the Indian business icon, Mr. Tata, is the largest private sector employer in the UK.

          A man or a company must develop through industry. But many in India illegally usurp the resources of the nation and spread the money in other countries. They have, in particular, made England a colony of India.

          In fact, the talk about Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is to deploy the stolen money in other countries.

          But, the prime minister should not have singled out Tata for this at the Parliament.

          Significantly, he said that India is committed to freedom of expression- individual liberties and rights. He proclaimed this as the basis of the Constitution of India.

          Mr. Modi met Queen Elizabeth II over lunch at the Buckingham Palace.

          The Queen greeted Mr. Modi at the Grand Entrance of the palace. She warmly shook hands with him. She showed the items from the royal collection brought out especially for the visit. These are an indication of the love of the Queen for India.

          It is pertinent to recall that the present man approached the Queen for the Freedom of Indians. She communicated this to all Commonwealth countries. She informed this to the present man.

Thus she did her ‘duty’.

This infuriated India.

Whatever happened, the Queen did not pay a visit to India to declare open the Commonwealth Games in New Delhi.

          The present man repeatedly requested then prime minister to pay a visit to the UK. He did not oblige.

          Mr. Modi fulfilled the demand.

          If he had declared Freedom to Indians, his visit might have gone down as a glorious one.

          Mr. Modi presented a copy of Bhagavat Gita to Mr. Cameron.

          When the Almighty stole butter, the guard rang the bell even though he had given a promise not to do so. Thus, he did his duty. This is the message of Gita.

          Even if the Almighty had stood in his way, he should have granted Freedom to Indians immediately after assuming power. He denied this just to enable his promoters to plunder the public resources.

          Thus, he forfeited his moral right to hand over  Gita to anyone.

          Instead of openly asking Mr. Modi to give Freedom to Indians,   Mr. Cameron presented a copy of the Magna Carta (The Great Charter) to Mr. Modi.

          Magna Carta is a charter agreed by the King of England in 1215. It is the foundation of the individual freedom against the arbitrary authority of the despot.

          It empowered 25 Barons to seize the castles and the properties of the King until, in their judgment, amends had been made. Once a redress had been made for any breaches, the King would continue to rule as before.

          Thus, Mr. Camaroon, apparently, wanted Mr. Modi to enact a strong law for Indians –equivalent to Magna Carta - for freedom of expression.   

          The prime minister said that India is committed to freedom of expression. He said this not to the Indians but to the British Parliament.

          Will he do his duty? 
   

          This is letter No.446.

This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 17-11- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

17-11---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

         

          

445. THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: SAVE THE NATION FROM THE CONSPIRATORS

445

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

SAVE THE NATION FROM THE CONSPIRATORS

          On 9 November 2015, addressing a gathering at the foundation day celebration of National Legal Service Authority (NALSA), Justice T.S. Thakur said that ‘no system, no polity, no society can survive if justice is not ensured’.

Does the Supreme Court of India ensure justice?

Does it not do injustice to 1000 million people?

He wanted to raise the legal awareness of the people. For this, he said that the celebrities must act as ambassadors to raise legal awareness. He advised the public broadcasters not to levy any charge for promoting legal awareness. He even wanted a song for it.

          Apparently, he has a desire to do right, for himself and for the nation.

          But he must know what is right.

          The Parliament cannot give arbitrary power to anyone.

Further, the law must be an impersonal one.

The National Judicial Appointment Commission (NJAC) Act is unconstitutional because of the above two reasons.

But the recent judgment is silent over these vital points.

If a law is enacted, any competent authority could carry it out. That authority cannot violate that law.

The law makers must be happy to see that their laws are being carried out by it.

The Chairman of the Public Service Commission (PSC), for instance, cannot use his discretion to select a candidate because he must obey the law.

          On that occasion, Justice T.S. Thakur said that that ‘Unity in Diversity’ must be celebrated.

          If he is true to his words, the Supreme Court of India would allot a definite quota of judges to every state.

          He, further, said that the people must know their rights, and they must have unhindered access to justice. 

          In a country, every citizen has rights that are assured by a strength that is greater than his own. He must have unmeasured freedom to do not anything based on his whims but on his innermost nature.

          But the Supreme Court of India warps this.

          Justice T.S. Thakur is set to become the Chief Justice of India on December 2, 2015. He has a wonderful chance to put right the public wrongs.

          Addressing the above meeting, Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi said that the Supreme Court of India and the Government should do the things together.

          Thus he wants Justice Thakur to succumb or succeed. The latter has to take the test and sink or swim.

In fact, he wants the court to be a conspirator to deny Freedom.

          Prime Minister of India, on 10 November 2015, said that the government had taken a decision to allow Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in the mining sector.

          This work demands the immediate takeover of all mines. The reasons were given earlier.

          But the government wants to conserve this for the manipulators. It believes that the FDI would serve this purpose.

          Will the new Chief Justice of India look at the Supreme Court of India to save the nation from the clutches of the conspirators?

This is letter No. 445.

          This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 11-11- 2015.

The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in

11-11---2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851