Tuesday, November 17, 2015

446 INDIA AND ENGLAND: GITA AND MAGNA CARTA

446

INDIA AND ENGLAND:
THE GITA AND THE MAGNA CARTA

          The USA introduced the H-1B visa reform Bill in the US Senate on 11 November 2015. The Bill prohibits certain companies from hiring H-1B employees.
          There are reports that this Bill would affect the Indians. 
          Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi paid a visit to the USA recently. He failed to do anything in this matter. Is it an effect of his visit?

          There are reports that Singapore decided to bar its nationals of Indian origin from attending the November 24 public reception for Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi. Those willing to attend must obtain permission from the competent authority.
          Now, it is known that China imposed such restrictions during his visit to China.
          There are reports that many governments do not relish the foreign policy initiatives of Mr. Modi and, therefore,  India.
          This will be followed by restriction on employment and eventual isolation.
          The present man predicted that his visits would recoil on Indians. This was duly communicated to His Excellency the President of India and the Supreme Court of India.
          Neither did they restrain him nor did they allow the people to know such views.
          The children dare to go into the underground in search of employment.
          Why should a prime minister jeopardize their career?

          There exists a rumour that Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi secretly asked a Chinese company to make the statue of Vallabhbhai Patel that is to be installed in Gujarat.
          If true, this would remind the story of the Blue Jackal because he told the people that he wanted to make everything in India.
          Therefore, the prime minister must confirm or deny this.

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) questioned a famous actor, Mr. Shah Rukh Khan, for three hours. The Hindu reported this on 13 November 2015.
The paper did not disclose the charges leveled against him.
The Supreme Court misuses its power in this matter also.  The reasons were given earlier.


          The Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi, paid a visit to England on 12 November 2015.
          He addressed the people of Indian origin at the Wembley Stadium. There were reports that the crowd was sharply short of the targeted 60,000. The artists sang a song titled ‘Made in India’.
          British Prime Minister Mr. David Cameron came out from his 10 Downing Street to receive him. He described the relation between the two sides “as a new dynamic and modern partnership”.
          Mr. Modi planted a sapling at the garden in the Chequers – the British Prime Minister’s residence in London.
          The British and the Indian companies announced new collaborations worth 9 billion pounds.
          Mr. Modi addressed the Parliament of the United Kingdom (UK) on 12 November 2015. He became the first Indian head to do so.
          He addressed the House in fluent English. In fact, he exhibited his proficiency in English. When he concluded his speech there was a loud round of applause.
          At the outset, he said that Prime Minister Mr. Cameron looked relaxed and relieved because the British Parliament was not in session.
          A prime minister must use the Parliament to relax the tension. A little relaxed discussion at the Parliament would do wonders to relieve stress.
          But his words belittled the Members of Parliament.
          Then he said that the Indian business icon, Mr. Tata, is the largest private sector employer in the UK.
          A man or a company must develop through industry. But many in India illegally usurp the resources of the nation and spread the money in other countries. They have, in particular, made England a colony of India.
          In fact, the talk about Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is to deploy the stolen money in other countries.
          But, the prime minister should not have singled out Tata for this at the Parliament.
          Significantly, he said that India is committed to freedom of expression- individual liberties and rights. He proclaimed this as the basis of the Constitution of India.
          Mr. Modi met Queen Elizabeth II over lunch at the Buckingham Palace.
          The Queen greeted Mr. Modi at the Grand Entrance of the palace. She warmly shook hands with him. She showed the items from the royal collection brought out especially for the visit. These are an indication of the love of the Queen for India.
          It is pertinent to recall that the present man approached the Queen for the Freedom of Indians. She communicated this to all Commonwealth countries. She informed this to the present man.
Thus she did her ‘duty’.
This infuriated India.
Whatever happened, the Queen did not pay a visit to India to declare open the Commonwealth Games in New Delhi.
          The present man repeatedly requested then prime minister to pay a visit to the UK. He did not oblige.
          Mr. Modi fulfilled the demand.
          If he had declared Freedom to Indians, his visit might have gone down as a glorious one.
          Mr. Modi presented a copy of Bhagavat Gita to Mr. Cameron.
          When the Almighty stole butter, the guard rang the bell even though he had given a promise not to do so. Thus, he did his duty. This is the message of Gita.
          Even if the Almighty had stood in his way, he should have granted Freedom to Indians immediately after assuming power. He denied this just to enable his promoters to plunder the public resources.
          Thus, he forfeited his moral right to hand over  Gita to anyone.
          Instead of openly asking Mr. Modi to give Freedom to Indians,   Mr. Cameron presented a copy of the Magna Carta (The Great Charter) to Mr. Modi.
          Magna Carta is a charter agreed by the King of England in 1215. It is the foundation of the individual freedom against the arbitrary authority of the despot.
          It empowered 25 Barons to seize the castles and the properties of the King until, in their judgment, amends had been made. Once a redress had been made for any breaches, the King would continue to rule as before.
          Thus, Mr. Camaroon, apparently, wanted Mr. Modi to enact a strong law for Indians –equivalent to Magna Carta - for freedom of expression.   
          The prime minister said that India is committed to freedom of expression. He said this not to the Indians but to the British Parliament.
          Will he do his duty? 
   
          This is letter No.446.
This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 17-11- 2015.
The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in
17-11---2015.
V. Sabarimuthu,
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.
Mobile: 9486214851
         


          

No comments: