Sunday, November 8, 2015

444. THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: THE CAPRICIOUS WILL

444

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:
THE CAPRICIOUS WILL

           The Supreme Court of India received ‘a deluge of suggestions’ from the people for bettering the collegium system of appointing judges. The court acknowledged it on 3 November 2015. The Bench, in fact, said that the diversity of suggestions was a ‘tremendous and unimaginable one’.
          The Chief Justice of India invited the suggestions on 20 October 2015. The present man responded on 24 October 2015, as mentioned in letter No.441.
          Mainly based on this work, His Excellency the President of India – as mentioned in the last letter - gave his suggestions on 31 October 2015.
          Many do not know the email address of the Supreme Court of India. Therefore,  the court solicited the people to post their views in the website: www. doj.gov.in on or before November 2015.
          Thus the court has recognized the suggestions and other matters submitted by the present man and many others before and after 3 November 2015.
           The court invites the people to give their suggestions because the Constitution of India failed to prescribe any rules for selecting judges.
          Similarly, the Constitution of India did not give any rules for enforcing freedom of expression.
          Therefore, court could have laid down some reasonable rules for Freedom after ascertaining the views of the people, if necessary. It did not do so.
          Now, the court can frame some rules for Freedom.
The judges determine the destiny of the people. Therefore, the question of selecting the judges is vital for the nation.
But the question of Freedom cannot be less important than this.
The court shall not leave this matter to the new judges.
           Now, the people  do not know that they have no Freedom.
         
          A Bench of the Supreme Court of India headed by Justice T.S. Thakur, on 4 November 2015, said that the High Courts could summon the armed forces for security in case the local police is ineffective. The Bench added that the institution should not be held to ransom.
          The armed forces should not have allowed the large scale removal of public resources that too after denying Freedom.

   Former Prime Minister of India Dr. Manmohan Singh, on 6 November 2015,  deplored the blatant violation of right to freedom of though, belief, speech and expression.
          He did not give any Freedom to the people to know  the existence of this work. In fact, the people did not even suspect the denial of Freedom during his rule.
          He now preaches love, mercy, justice and even Freedom!   

          There are reports that a Mr.Killivalavan, a relative of Ms. Sasikala and a Mr. Vaukundarajan, a miner, bought a mine in a foreign country for Re.22000 crore. Miss. Sasikala is an aide of the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu.
          If true, this has been going on since independence with the knowledge of the political parties, intelligence agencies and the Supreme Court of India.
          Otherwise, the court might have asked the intelligence agencies to ascertain the veracity of such reports long ago.
          The condition aggravated after the BALCO judgement.
Thus the court transmitted the VSNL, IPCL, Provident Fund, Pension Fund, foreign exchange and many other public resources to the ruling class in the pretext of policy decision.
          The law governing the policy decision is a  defunct one. But the court refuses to recover the conquered assets.
          If a man gets a permit to remove one unit of sand, he removes not less than ten units. 
When a man obtains a licence to remove one barrel of crude oil, the ratio must be in the order 1:1000.
This is how the people in the street talk.
          Is the Supreme Court of India oblivious of this?
          The tragedy is that the proceeds from the minerals  never reach India but roam in other countries.
          But for this, the foreign exchange reserves of India might have crossed $ 1 trillion.
          What is the reason for this?
          The liberties of the people do not depend on rules and laws.
          Naturally, the natural resources of the people do not depend on any rules and laws.
      Alas! They simply depend on the capricious will of the  Supreme Court of India.
          Is it not the reason for this?
This is letter No.444.
 This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 7-11- 2015.
The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in
7-11---2015.
V. Sabarimuthu,
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.
Mobile: 9486214851
         


No comments: