Monday, November 23, 2015

447. THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: A JAIL TERM FOR 30 JUDGES?

447

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:
A JAIL TERM FOR 30 JUDGES?

          According to the Global Financial Integrity (GFI), the Indians parked US$ 462 billion in tax heavens between 1948 and 2008. The GFI is a Washington based think-tank. The report appeared on 18 November 2015.
          It is consistent with the revelations of the WikiLeaks. It is also consistent with the resources of India.

          All India Footwear Manufacturers and Retailers Association (AIFMFA) alleged in the High Court, Delhi that foreign money appears through complex corporate structures. Accordingly, Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw directed the government to probe twenty one E-Commerce web sites.
          These things happen with the knowledge of the government and the Supreme Court of India. Therefore, the court should have asked the government whether it has any knowledge about it or not.

          Former Union Minister Subramonia Swamy alleged that a prominent leader of the Congress Party - Mr. Rahul Gandi,- has business interests in England through some shell companies. He wanted a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) or the Directorate of Enforcement (ED). Earlier he alleged that Mr. Rahul Gandhi has a huge amount of black money.
          The allegations are not politics but acts of corruption.
          The Supreme Court of India must have noticed his words. His Excellency the President of India recently said that a letter or an article in the newspapers could be treated as a writ petition.
          Evidently, the court must bring the truth to the knowledge of the people.
          It does not do so.
          He has Re. 44 lakh beyond the known sources of income. Call the army to arrest him. He has Re.200 crore. Send him to jail. He has Re. 6 crore. Question him. This is how the court runs the show.
          The court refuses to go near the big offenders.
          This induces the political leaders and others to siphon off money like this.

          The Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi, on 18 November 2015, addressed the Sixth Global Focal Point on Asset Recovery hosted by the CBI..
On that occasion, he declared that action had been taken to recover black money. He added that a Special Investigation Team had been constituted under the supervision of the Supreme Court of India for this.
This work shows that the judges of the Supreme Court of India are an embodiment of corruption.
Further, he said that significant steps had been taken to check corruption. He disclosed that disciplinary action had been taken against 45 senior officers for unsatisfactory performance. The action included pension cuts and termination from service.
Perhaps, the officers might have wanted to question the learned judges of the Supreme Court. Otherwise, the government might have informed the people as and when the action was taken.
          Furthermore, he said that agreements had been signed with many countries for exchanging real time information on black money.
          He said that a provision had been introduced under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act for restitution of assets. This will enable millions of poor investors – as in the so-called ponzi schemes- to recover a part of their hard earned money
          When the SUS bank in the Tamil Nadu State was closed, thousands of people lost their money. All actions hitherto taken by the government ended in vain. Yet, he talks like this!
          Above all, he said that his government provided a governance structure that is sensitive, transparent and accountable.
          He, in bad faith, conceals this work from the people.          This shows that he has some dark secrets.

          The Seventh Central Pay Commission submitted its report to the government on 19 November 2015. It recommended an overall increase of 23.55 per cent in pay.
          The Government announced only 16 per cent in the Parliament. Apparently, as a result of the intervention by the present man, it increased to the present level.
          Earlier, the UPA government had introduced the grade pay due to similar reasons.
          Now, the government has unlimited money.
It uses the remittances of the hardworking hands for imports. This affects the money circulation. There is virtually no job for the coolies. They suffer in silence. Therefore, this money must be pumped back into the economy forthwith.
The Supreme Court of India must submit an action taken report to the people in this matter.

The five judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India headed by Justice JS. Khehar, on 18 November 2015, revealed that the court received 1450 suggestions from 3500 individuals for the appointment of judges.
These suggestions could be put under, say, five or six rules.
But the Bench did not reveal the suggestions that are reasonable.
Instead, the Bench directed the Government to formulate the draft of Memorandum of Procedure (MoP) for strengthening the Collegium System.
The government, on the next day, refused to obey the order.
Either we decide or you decide. This was the reply of the government. It said that there was nothing in the Constitution for the MoP.
This is the real problem.
There are no laws for the MoP.
There are no laws for selection of judges.
There are no laws for enforcing freedom of expression.
There are no laws for public properties.
What is there in the Constitution?
There are many laws for punishing drivers and conductors!
Further, the reply shows that so long as the selection is an arbitrary one, the government will support the court.
The government wants the court not to devise even any guidelines for selection.
Will the court obey the government?
Or, will the government obey the court?

There are reports that the Odisha State alienated the iron ore present in a region to Tata.
At one time the Supreme Court of India says that the ores come under the Union Government. At another time, it says that they come under the states.
The governments are forbidden from alienating the natural resources. The reasons were given earlier.
The Supreme Court connives at it because it is Tata. But it must do its duty even if the natural resources are alienated to the Almighty.

The Union Government, on 18 November 2015, decided to sell 10 per cent shares each of the public sector Cochin Shipyard Limited and the Coal India Limited (CIL).
          The government, again on the same day, decided to e-auction eight more coal blocks from January 18 to 22 January 2016.
          These are unconstitutional decisions.
Further, these are acts of corruption. The reasons were given earlier.
These are similar to the illegal alienation of the public sector IPCL, VSNL, BALCO and the HZL.
The Supreme Court of India wants to point out the laws that prevent the alienation of public resources.
Therefore, a strong law – similar to the Magna Carta – must be enacted to keep 30 judges of the Supreme Court of India in jail until the restoration of all illegally alienated public resources.

This is letter No.447.
This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army  the Indian Air Force, Department of Justice and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 23-11- 2015.
The same letter is emailed to collegium –suggestions@gov.in and collegium-improvements@gov.in
23-11---2015.
V. Sabarimuthu,
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.

Mobile: 9486214851

No comments: