443
THE
CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA;
MURDER
OF JUSTICE
The
media is reporting that a number of eminent writers, artists and scientists
returned their national awards and honours to register their protest against
‘the climate of intolerance’ in the country.
Top
scientist P.M. Bhargava returned his Padma Bhushan award on 29 October 2015.
Film makers like Mr. Dibakar Banerjee,
Mr. Anand Patwardhan followed suit.
Ten film makers urged the President of India and the Prime Minister of India to
protect the freedom of expression of each citizen.
The
media attributed this to the lynching of a man at Dadri in the Utter Pradesh State for eating beef and the
killings of one or two writers.
However,
Mr.Madhur Bhandarkar, Mr. Anupam Kher and Mr.Ashoke Pandit considered this as a
mark of protest against impediments to freedom of expression in the
country. They added that the differences of opinion are being sought to be
settled by using physical violence.
Some
felt that the awards were given by the nation and not by any political party
and as such they wanted to retain them.
In
this connection, Union Minister Mr. Arun
Jaitely depicted this as a manufactured rebellion by the rabid anti- BJP
elements.
Do
the national award winners know the existence of this work? If not, what will
they think as and when they come to know about this work?
Is
it not the right of every citizen to know the existence of this work?
His
Excellency the President of India alone can give an answer.
Union
Finance Minister Mr. Arun Jaitely
said that his party favours reservation.
Every
citizen contributes his share to the well being of India. But 70 per cent of
them have virtually no representation in the Supreme Court of India.
We
are intelligent. You are not. You must contribute your physical labour and
leave the place. We cannot allow multiplicity. This is the reply of the learned
judges for the cries for reservation.
This
is a wrong stand.
The
people must be divided into as many categories as possible. Every section must
get a reasonable share in the seats and assets.
The
existence of different states, religions and castes is a blessing in disguise
for reservation.
Even
if there is a common curriculum all over India, the students must be classified
in as many different ways as possible.
For
instance, English medium students must get a definite quota. Similarly, students
of the rural areas must get their share. The upper class also must get everything
in proportion to their numbers.
In
this way, there could be 100 per cent reservation.
This
is for ‘JUSTICE FOR ALL’.
The
Government of Tamil Nadu arrested an anti liquor activist under sedition
charges on 30 October 2015. The political parties condemned it. Apparently, he
is still in jail.
On
the same day, a section of the media reported that Ms. Sasikala-an aide of the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu-amassed
wealth over Re. 1000 crore in 2014. The report was based on some documentary
evidences.
It
is similar to the one that emanated from Rajasthan recently.
These
are going on in many places with the knowledge of the Supreme Court of India
and the intelligence agencies.
On
the face of it, these are big acts of corruption and, therefore, none could
connive at it.
But
these are nothing compared to the theft of the public sector BALCO and many
other similar assets mentioned in different chapters.
Therefore,
the timing of the above report must be discerned.
There
exists a crucial question before the Supreme Court of India.
It
is to be or not to be.
It
is to question or not to question.
It
is to sentence or not to sentence.
It
is to exist or not to exist.
All
right thinking people going through this work would agree that the rabid greed
for wealth forced the learned judges to alienate the public resources.
Thieve
as many assets as possible. We will protect you in one way or other. The
learned judges talked like this to the manipulators.
Evidently,
the learned judges keep these assets.
Therefore,
they must surrender the stolen assets before questioning or sentencing other
economic offenders.
This
is to establish rule of law in India.
His
Excellency the President of India Mr.
Pranab Mukherjee, on 31 October 2015, said the following: 1. “The
appointment of judges must confirm to the highest standard of probity.
2. Whichever system of appointment
we follow, the best must be selected.
3. Well established and transparent
principles must be followed.
4. No one will be allowed to meddle
in the appointment.
5. Quality should not be sacrificed
in the pretext of expeditious selection.
6. Judges must help maintain social
order.
7. Judiciary is the upholder of the
rule of law.
8.Multiplicity is our collective
strength. It must be preserved.
9. Justice for all means equal
treatment of all.
10. A post card or an article in
the newspapers is sufficient to set off judicial action. This brings justice
closer to the common man and
11. The court must ‘reinvent itself
through introspection and self correction’.
A
few days ago, the Chief Justice of India submitted a list of 22 arbitrarily
selected judges to him.
It
went down as a murder of justice. Within no time, he administered oath of
office to them.
The
present stand of the President is a repercussion of the last letter.
He
realizes the simple fact that only an arbitrary constitution would allow arbitrary
appointment of judges.
We
are the judges. We will use our discretion or indiscretion to select judges.
This is the stand of the judges.
Therefore,
there is no rule of law in India.
Naturally,
the judges so selected do not know the meaning of the words arbitrary,
immutable, impersonal and even Freedom.
Where
is it in the Constitution of India? They ask questions like this one to the
President of India.
The
above speech was delivered at the Golden Jubilee Celebration of the High Court,
Delhi. The theme of the Jubilee was ‘JUSTICE FOR ALL".
The
Chief Justice of India listened to his speech.
Through
this speech, the President of India virtually entered the Supreme Court before
the Chief Justice could add a second murder to his credit.
This is letter No.443.
This email
is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of
India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and
posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 1-11- 2015
1-11---2015.
V. Sabarimuthu,
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.
Mobile: 9486214851
No comments:
Post a Comment