CHAPTER 177

  177

   

THROWING DUST

The last mail was submitted to Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 13 May 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court, Indian Army, Indian Air Force and the Election Commission of India. It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com   

         A two judge bench of the Supreme Court (SC) comprising Justices B. S. Chauhan and Sathasivam on 17 May 2011 observed that the tendency to malign the reputation of the judicial officers by the disgruntled elements –lawyers included- was increasing. The bench said this - in the open court - during a contempt proceeding against some advocates. The statement must be read and interpreted in the light of this work.


        The ‘Time’ magazine on 19 May 2011 gave second rank to Mr. Raja, former Union Minister, in its ‘ignominious club of privileged leaders who stepped too far’ in the world. He came behind Mr. Kim Jong II of North Korea. Mr. Gaddafi of Libya came third.

       Mr. L.K. Advani, Mr. A.B. Vajpayee, Dr. Manmohan Singh and  Mrs. Sonia Gandhi vie one another for the first place in India. Mr. A. Raja would come below at least 500 leaders in India.  Therefore, there must be a ‘force’ behind the list prepared by ‘Time’.

        The Union Government on 19 May 2011 decided to sell its entire 95 per cent shares in Scooters India Ltd (SIL). As on 2009– 2010, it had a net loss of Re. 22.03 crore.

       The Special CBI court on 20 May 2011 sent Mrs. Kanimozhi, daughter of Dr. M. Karunanidhi, a leader of the ruling United Progressive Alliance-II (UPA-II) at the centre, to Tihar jail for judicial custody. Mr. Sarad Kumar, Kalaignar TV Managing Director, was also sent to the same jail. The reasons cited were: 1. The magnitude of the crime 2.The nature of the allegations.  3. The character of evidence and 4. To pre-empt her from influencing the witnesses.

       Mr. Venkaiah Naidu, a senior leader of the BJP on 22 May 2011 described the two year rule of the UPA- II as a saga of betrayals.

       A SC bench comprising Justices G.S. Singhvi and A.k. Ganguly on 26 May 2011 quashed the West Bengal Government Order that allotted land to Mr. Sourav Ganguly, former Cricket Captain, for setting up an integrated sports school.

     The bench said that the action of the government was arbitrary and against Article 14 (equality) of the Constitution of India. The bench observed that the state should have acted within the discipline of the constitutional law.

      Justice Ganguly acknowledged that the allot tee was a cricketer of great repute. But- as a judge- he had to be objective and eschew his likes and dislikes and render justice to a cause.

       Anyone - going through the judgment –would think that the judges of the SC eschew their likes and dislikes and do their duty.

          In this connection, it must be stated that many state governments had been giving land to different persons to promote the cause of education. The governments had been describing this policy, as decisions taken in good faith.

          The BALCO judgment said that the court should not review the policy decisions.

          Yet, the bench cancelled the allotments. This proves that the Constitution of India is supreme. Using this judgment, the SC must review the BALCO judgment, and put right all public wrongs committed since 2001. Now the court is applying the Constitution for deciding small things only.

       The Department of Telecommunication (DoT) on 27 May 2011 recommended 30 per cent reservation for “Made in India” equipment.

       The above decision is consistent with this work. However, all importers must be asked to get a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from a competent authority so that no  Indian producer would be affected.

      The militant people killed 9 police men in the Chhattisgarh state on 25 May 2011. None in India condemned it.

     

       A supporter of Miss Mamata Banerjee, Chief Minister of the West Bengal state, touched her feet on 27 May 2011.The Hindu took a photo of the above scene and published it on 28 May 2011.

          In this connection, it must be noted that the above leader helped   transmit Re. 3 lakh crore in the Provident Fund (PF) to two or three boys. As the people are not aware of this, they touch the feet of such leaders.

      An accused in the 2G spectrum case submitted in the ‘special court’ that the CBI had been selective in prosecution.

     The present writer has been telling this to the SC. Now an affidavit has been submitted in this matter in a special court. The judge has not taken any decision in this matter.

          The above court dismissed two private complaints that sought an investigation to find out the role played by Mrs. Niira Radia and Mr. Anil Ambani in the 2G spectrum scandal.

          The court said that the police case could not be altered beyond recognition at the instance of third parties. The complainants –Mr. Dharmender Pandey and Dr. Furquan – were fined Re.10.000/- each for wasting the court’s time.

       However, another petitioner –Shahid Usman Balwa- got permission to seek case diary, statements of the accused and suspects, and the progress report of the 2G spectrum case.

      A court in the Kerala state ruled that the people committing crime cannot be public servants. Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India,   must notice the meaning of this judgment.   

   

          Tehelka Magazine leveled some serious corruption charges against Mr. Dayanidhi Maran, a Union Cabinet Minister, belonging to the DMK party.

       

        Mr. Hosni Mubarak, ousted President of Egypt, tendered his apology for any offence caused to the people.

     Mr. A.B. Vajpayee, Mr. L.K. Advani, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, Dr.Manmohan Singh and Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil should examine whether they should follow suit or not.

     Sri Lanka on 31 May 2011 said that the LTTE was defeated only because of the support extended by India.

      It is imperative that the people responsible for extending military support to Sri Lanka must be identified.

          The Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) on 2 June 2011 submitted in the SC that Mr. Dayanidhi Maran functioned as the Telecom Minister from 23 May 2004 to 15 May 2007. During his tenure he granted 14 licences to Aircel. In return a Malaysian company- Maxis Group - bought 20 per cent shares of Sun Direct – a private company of the relatives of Mr. Maran -  for Re. 599 crore The CPIL alleged that it was bribe money. One or two newspapers alleged that he forced Mr. Sivasankaran to sell his Aircel by ignoring his demands. Mr. Maran filed a deformation case.

       The advocate of the CPIL was Mr. Prasant Bhusan. The media did not mention the names of the judges in the bench. The judges are afraid of him because he might publish the list of the judges in his payroll.

          The Indian Express on 2 June 2011 reported that Mr.Maran illegally got a 323-line telephone exchange. The public sector BSNL laid underground cable through public property to the SUN - TV office thereby causing a loss of over Re.400 crore to the nation.          

          Swamy Baba Ramdev threatened to go on a hunger strike from 4 June 2011 onwards against corruption.

       As the media started giving all India publicity to the above, many Union Ministers met him. In fact, it was reminiscent of the publicity given to the hunger strike of Mr. Anna Hazare. This shows that both would not demand the Government to use public assets for public welfare.

               The Neyveli Lignite Corporation (NLC) – a PSU- got a profit of Re.1,298 crore in the year ended March 2011. The NDA government had taken a decision to sell it for about Re.1000 crore.   

      Cairn India – a private petrol exploration company - got a profit of Re. 6712.2 crore for the year ended 31 March  2011 out of its total revenue of Re.10,277.93 crore. The profit in the previous year was Re.1623 crore.

          None gave any reason for the spurt in profit. It may be attributed to the audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG).

      In this connection, it may be reiterated that the profit is not the good luck of any private individuals. Consistent with Article 14, it must be taken over forthwith.

           

         Government now raised Re.1162 crore by selling five percent shares of the public sector Power Finance Corporation in this month.

        It is pertinent to recall that the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) Government sold properties as well as the shares of the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). For this, it gave public money to them. At times, it deposited tax payer’s money in the banks under one pretext or other.

          Thus the Government targeted to raise Re.12000 crore through disinvestments during 2001-2002. But, it plotted to give over Re.40,000 crore to the UTI alone through budgetary provisions. A few individuals used the entire money for buying the PSUs or their shares. This was the genesis of the betrayal.

          Mr. L.K. Advani and Mr. A.B. Vajpayee were behind this and it is the reason why the former does not utter a word against the act of selling public properties. For the same reason, the latter absconds, or the media protects him.

          Presenting the report card of the UPA- II, Dr. Manmohan Singh said that he was taking steps to reduce discretionary and arbitrary use of power by officials. He added that he had been taking action to root out corruption. So long he succeeds in giving public money to private parties he will go on talking like this.

          On the above occasion, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi said that the Government was taking steps to prevent any financial scandals in future. The meaning is not a clear one.

     

       2195 students from the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras zone have found their names in the Joint Entrance Examination – IIT-JEE Common Merit List (CML). 1614 students are from the Andra Pradesh state alone. 227 students are from Tamil Nadu state.

        It must be reiterated that the position in the IIT-JEE-CML is not an index of the intelligence or ability of the students. It is an index of the nature of the coaching. Therefore, all Chief Ministers must demand a definite number of seats for their states.

       Miss Jayalalitha, Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu state, cancelled the Uniform Education System (UES) introduced by her predecessor. As the UES enriched the earlier state syllabus, she could have continued it for the Government and the aided schools.

      

     The Neyveli Lignite Corporation (NLC) got a profit of Re. 1298 crore in the year ended March 2011.

            The Central Information Commission directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to give reason why Ambani brothers were not charge-sheeted in a 2006 case relating to the alleged masking of international calls as local calls.

          Mr. Yogesh Agarwal, Chairman of the Pension Fund Regulatory Development Authority (PFRDA) on 2 June 2011 said that only 50 per cent of assets of about Re.9000 crore in the new Pension Fund would be invested in the stock market.

          He said that LIC Pension Fund Limited, SBI Pension Fund Limited, UTI Retirement solutions, IDFC Pension Fund Management –a company formed in 2009 - Kotak Mahindra Pension Fund and Reliance Capital Pension Fund were managing the money.

          The IDFC Pension Fund was formed only in 2009. An enquiry alone would reveal the nature of the people behind the IDFC Pension Fund.

        There were reports that the Pension Fund had Re.3 lakh crore. Now the Government says that it has only Re.9000 crore.

          In this connection, it must be stated that the UPA- I Government had taken a decision to hand over the money in the Provident Fund to two or three private parties. The people believed that Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, vetoed the decision based on this work. Now there are reports that the money –Re.3 lakh crore- had actually been given to them. Everything happened secretly.

         None expects anyone to do any service to the nation. But, everyone expects others to do their duty. Everyone believes that Her Excellency the President of India has been doing her duty. Alas! She has been throwing dust into the eye of 1000 million people. Unless otherwise prevented, she would continue to do this and the entire Pension Fund would go the way of the Provident Fund. 

     

      The facts from 14 May 2011 to 3 June 2011 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 4 June 2011.

V.SABARIMUTHU

26-3 Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu PO .PIN:629167

INDIA

     

CHAPTER 176

176

                      THE CONFIDANTES

       The last mail was submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 21 April 2011. The same mail was sent to the Supreme Court, Indian Army, Indian Air Force and the Election Commission of India. It was posted in the blog www: howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com and a link was given to www.thattan.com

The present writer started a few more blogs. Thus the present blogs  are:

1. www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com

1. www.momentousmonths-india.blogspot.com

2.www.13months-india.blogspot.com

3. www.aconspiracy-india.blogspot.com

4. www.inbadfaith-india.blogspot.com

5. www.theconfidants-india.blogspot.com

6.www. temples-and-churches.blogspot.com

7.www. effectiveinorganicchemistry.blogspot.com

     A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice D.K. Jain and Justice H.L. Datta rescued itself from hearing the petition of Justice Dinakaran, Chief Justice of High Court, Sikkim.

          He had exhorted the court that justice must not only be done but also appear to be done.

          An allegation against him was that he grabbed land using his ill-gotten money.

         This is the condition everywhere. The learned judges “fix” judgments to grab land in the rural areas. The political leaders or their relatives get commission in the form of shares. The big companies demand Government land or public money.

          One opposed to the above condition is construed as an enemy of the nation.

          Hindustan Zinc Ltd (HZL) got a profit of Re.1770 crore during 2010-2011. The public sector HZL had been sold to a charge-sheeted company. Therefore, the sale was not only unconstitutional but also against the policy approved by the Union Cabinet for selling the Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs).

          There is a theory that the big companies like Vedanta must be kept in good humour by giving public assets like the BALCO, HZL. The reasoning is that they would enjoy them for buying assets abroad.

          The antagonists of the above theory believe that the public assets must be recovered for the welfare of all.

      Mr. A. K. Antony, Defense Minister, on 25 April 2011 asked the commanders of the Indian Army and Air Force to be on guard against corrupt practices, He added that the vested interests - at times - bring about unnecessary pressure and resort to corrupt practices.

          The Supreme Court bench comprising Justice R.V. Raveendran and Justice A.K. Patnaik on 26 April 2011 quashed the policy of imposing Airport Development Fee by the private airport developers in Delhi and Mumbai airports.

       The Government had allowed the private operators to levy development fee from the passengers. It was the economic policy of the Government for the purported development of the nation. But the court said that this fee had been imposed without the authority of law. This shows that the courts could strike down any unconstitutional economic policy.

     The Supreme Court shall not retract from the present stand when bigger issues confront it.

However, the bench should have recovered the amount already collected.

           Further, the court could have directed the Government to take back the airports because the airports were sold without the authority of any law.

          A UN panel reported that both Sri Lanka and the LTTE committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in the last stages of Eelam war. But Mr. Ban Ki-moon, General Secretary of the UN, on 26 April 2011 said that the UN could not set up an international team to investigate war crimes without the consent of Sri Lanka or a decision by the member states.

          India had given logistic support to   commit crimes against humanity. The present writer had tried his level best to prevent it.

       But, the Cabinet Secretary obeyed the direction of the underground moles. Alternatively, he acted independently. He did not listen to the political leadership. In fact, Dr. M. Karunanidhi –a leader of the ruling coalition – had undertaken a fast in vain.

          Apart from India, China and Pakistan had supported Sri Lanka.

          Even the UN had contributed to the killings.

         Therefore, none would be brought to justice in the normal course.

         

          Indian Coast Guard on 26 April 2011 captured 15 Sri Lankan fishermen for illegally fishing in Indian waters.

          A Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice  S.H. Kapadia, Justice Aftab Alam and Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan directed suspension of operation in 19 mines in the Karnataka states. The petitioner contended that 375 lakh metric tonne of iron ore had been exported without valid permits.  This comes to Re. 15,245 crore.

         The advocate for the petitioner was Mr. Prasant Bhushan.

       There are allegations that the above advocate had been functioning as a middle man.

      

         India on 28 April 2011 decided to exclude two American Companies -Boeing and Lockheed Martin –from its estimated $11 billion 126 fighter jet deal and short listed two European companies –Eurofighter Thyphoon and the French Dassault’s Rafale.

     A Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia, Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan and Justice Swatanter Kumar on 29 April 2011 rejected a PIL filed by Mohanoharlal Sharma who had sought a CBI enquiry into the alleged illegal activities of Mr. Shati Bhusan and his son Mr. Prasant Bhusan –two Supreme Court advocates.

                   If the Supreme Court accepts such petitions, many lawyers and judges will not extend their co-operation for the day-to- day functioning of the court.    However, the court should have accepted the above petition. Now it appears as another “fixed” judgment.

          Dr. Manmohan Singh, Prime Minister of India, on 30 April 2011 requested the CBI not to spare any offender. He asked the CBI not to chase any innocent people.

          Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India, on 30 April 2011 said that she would not opt for a second term. She must give FREEDOM to Indians. For this she must do her duty till the last day last minute in office.

          The Union Government on 2 May 2011granted final forest clearance to the Re.54000 crore integrated steel plant of POSCO in the Orissa state.

       In this connection, it must be stated that whenever the Union Government sells the land belonging to the public sector National Textile Corporation (NTC) some leaders or their relatives get some commission either as shares or in cash. This makes practically all relatives of the leaders very rich.

          The above principle is applicable to South Korea as well. When the Indian industrialists wanted to buy assets in South Korea, the latter wanted a suitable bribe.

       The underground moles in India directed the Union Government to give a mine to the POSCO. Satisfied by this gesture, South Korea allowed the Indian industrialists to buy assets there.

       Evidently, the POSCO steel plant in Orissa is the bribe given by India to South Korea for the benefit of private parties.  It is out and out unconstitutional. It is an act of corruption. The POSCO shall not be granted permission to exploit the iron ores of India.

          There are reports that South Korea is going to give award to an Indian leader. It would do more as an act of reciprocation.

      A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice P. Sathasivam and Justice B.S. Chauhan on 7 May 2011 upheld the order of a special court to attach the assets of stock broker Mr. Harshad Mehta to settle his liabilities. The court observed that the purpose of law is not to allow the offenders to sneak out of the meshes of law.

      It must be noted that Mr. Harshad Mehta had amassed a huge amount of wealth.

       One day, the CBI placed his physical shares in some rooms and locked each room with a small lock. Later, the locks were broken and the shares removed. Nothing came out of this case.

      The contention that he had liabilities appears as a curious one. The Government must have attached all his unaccounted assets long ago.

          The Directorate of Enforcement on 5 May 2011 suspended an officer in charge of investigation of Mr. Hassan Ali case during 2006 -2008. The motive is not a clear one.

      A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice G.S. Singhi and Justice A.K. Ganguly wanted results from the CBI in the 2G spectrum investigation. It is the Supreme Court that must produce results in all cases and the papers before it.

          Dr. M. Karunanidhi, Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu state, on 7 May 2011 said that that the media - in the name of freedom of expression – should not throw FREEDOM to the wind. His words might have sent shock waves to the courts, CBI, media and the Government.

          Mr. P. Chithambaram, on 7 May 2011, said that some people wanted the removal of the Prime Minister, Finance Minister, Governor of the Reserve Bank of India and many others in one go. He added that it would never happen.

     Mr. Deepak Parek, Chairman of the Housing Development Finance Corporation (HDFC), on 8 May 2011, deplored that there was no congenial atmosphere for the big industrialists to invest their money in India. He added that they were being forced to invest their money in other countries. He says that this tendency affects the progress of India and promotes the progress of other countries.

        In contrast, the underground moles had been saying that the act of removing the public assets by private parties for the purpose of investing in other countries would take the nation to the stars.

       The Supreme Court says that it does not understand the difference between the former, and the latter.

        In this connection Mr. Deepak Parek must tell the way in which the Government extends tax exemption for housing loans taken from the HDFC. He could disclose the beneficiaries of this policy.

          Further, he must tell the constitutionality of giving Re.3 lakh crore rotting in the Provident Fund (PF) to four banks.

       The Government had given the PF money not only to the ICICI bank but also to a bank in Hong Kong.

        Did the Government monitor the method of utilization?

       Will a bank in Hong Kong, use the PF money for the development of India?

        Why did the Government give the money secretly?

        In this matter, every Union Minister must be prosecuted at least 3 lakh times. All right thinking people going through this work would demand it.

        The Chief of Indian Air Force, Air Chief Marshal P.V. Naik, said that the creation of a new post to bring the chiefs of the armed forces under a single command would be a redundant one.

          The reason for the current move of the Government is that the armed forces lighted fire as mentioned in Chapter 135. The Government would do anything to remove public assets as at present.

        A Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia and Justices Altamas Kabir, R.V. Raveendran, B. Sudershan Reddy, Aftab Alam rejected a petition to reopen the Bhopal Gas Tragedy case saying that there was no ground for a curative petition 14 years after a judgment.

          It must be noted that the tragedy occurred on the night of December 2-3, 1984. At that time, Mr. Shanti Bhusan – through a statement –opposed out of the court settlement. That was the real disaster.

        The Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Dalveer and Deepak Verma, on 10 May 2011,  upheld the order of the Delhi High court to prosecute three top officials –Mr. Sethuraman, Mr. Shakar and Mr. Balasubramoniam -  of the undivided  Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL).  The allegation was that they were in possession of confidential papers pertaining to the Union Cabinet. The case was registered in 1998.

     

       Another Supreme Court bench comprising Justice A.K. Ganguly and Justice GS.Singhvi lifted the stay on the so-called Amar Singh tapes. The court  restrained the media from publishing the tapes about five years ago.

          Despite the judgment, media did not publish the tapes. This shows that the Supreme Court must enforce freedom of expression.

          Now, there is no reason for the learned judges to keep the so-called Radia tapes under their coat.

            Many other cases are pending like this. An example is the election petition against Mr. P. Chithambaram, Home Minister, pending in the High Court, Chennai.

          Mr. Ragul Gandhi on 10 May 2011 paid visit to the UP state in a two wheeler to meet the agitating farmers. His Government had given Re. three lakh crore to four banks secretly.

          The election results for four major states have been declared.

           The TC party of Miss. Mamata Banerjee, Railway Minister, has won the election in the West Bengal state. She had been a party to the unconstitutional removal Re. 3 lakh crore from the PF account.

          The ruling DMK under Dr. M. Karunanidhi and the CPI (M) under Mr.V.S. Achuthanandan have been defeated in Tamil Nadu and Kerala states respectively. They could have given freedom to the people.

          The election results are null and void because the Election Commission of India did not ensure FREEDOM of expression. 

 

            Now, there are reports that the Union Government would sell 5 per cent shares of Power Finance Corporation. The shares of the ONGC, SAIL and Hindustan Copper would also be sold from June 2011 onwards to garner Re.40,000 crore.

          It may be recalled that the then Prime Minister of India, Mr. A.B. Vajpayee, convened the Advisory Council of Trade and Industry in September 2001 and informed his decision to use public money for public investments.

However, within two days, the Economic Advisory Council was convened presumably at the instance of the industrialists. They forced him to change the policy.

Within a few days, the Government sold the Computer Maintenance Corporation (CMC), which had been showing a growth rate of 27% in preceding three years, to Tata Sons for Re. 207 crore, a price lower than the market price.

Hindustan Teleprinters Ltd (HTL) –another PSU - was sold to Himachal Futuristic Communication Ltd for Re. 152 crore.

While selling the PSUs, Mr. Vajpayee - for joke - said that the Government was opposed to privatization of profits and socialization of pains.

However, everything would appear like a plot against the nation. So he did not want to do it directly. Further, it was his first experience. Therefore, the privatization of the PSUs shocked him.

However, he wanted to sell the big PSUs at all costs. At the same time, the banks must be asked to lend money to the industrialists without knowing the real purpose.

Further, the banks had not sufficient deposits. In order to enable them to give money to the private parties, the Government had to pump the money of the tax payers into the banks.

He could not reconcile all these with his patriotic principles. Therefore, he had requested Mr. L.K. Advani, Home Minister, to do the job during his foreign tour.

         Thus, in the second week of November, Mr. Vajpayee left New Delhi for a ten-day tour of Russia and the USA. The Cabinet Committee on Disinvestments (CCD) chaired by Mr. L.K. Advani, Home Minister, decided to sell 51 percent equity in Indian Petrochemicals Ltd (IPCL) including 26 percent to a strategic partner in 90 days.

At the same time, Bank of India (BoI) gave an advance of Re. 845 crore to Tata Finance.

 The crucial question was whether Tata took the money for investment purposes or to buy the PSUs. The present writer waited patiently.

After a few months, the IPCL was sold to Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) and the VSNL to Tata. Each one was worth Re. more than Re. one lakh crore.

The sale of the IPCL was unconstitutional because it had been sold in violation of a guideline for privatization. The sale of the VSNL was unconstitutional because public money had been used to buy it.

This was the genesis.

This is the reason why Mr. L.K. Advani is not opposing the present disinvestment policy of the Government.

  The Supreme Court has been talking about policy decision only to cover up their offence.

Evidently, majority of the leaders of the ruling parties, opposition parties, bureaucrats and the learned judges of the Supreme Court are the confidants of the top industrialists.

Mrs. Pratibha Devesingh Patil, Her Excellency the President of India,  and the armed forces must introspect whether it is their duty to retrieve the nation from them or not. 

The facts from 22 April 2011 to 13 May 2011 are being submitted to Her Excellency the President of India on 14 May 2011.

V.SABARIMUTHU

26-3 Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O.

PIN : 629167

INDIA.