Letter No.599

From

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Vellicode

PIN: 629167

India

To

Mr. Ram Nath Kovind

His Excellency the President of India

New Delhi

Sub: Enforcing freedom of expression –reg

The President of India is taking away the ‘life’ and ‘liberty’ of the people by making the Constitution of India an inoperative one.

Apparently, the President of India is being kept in the Presidential Palace like a prisoner.

Former President of India Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam and his successor, Mrs. Pratibha Patil, used to talk something. But the present President of India is not talking anything.

Four judges came to the open, only because of the action taken by the present President of India. Similarly, the President of India uttered the word of Mr. B.R. Ambedkar mainly because of the letters

This is the conclusion of a man sitting far away from Delhi.

However, what all the present man knows is his letters and the effect. What actually happened in between is an imagination only.

After writing hundreds of letters for seventeen years, a citizen of India sought freedom as guaranteed by the Constitution of India.

The President of India is the only competent authority to give it.

For this, the President of India was not asked to invade the territory of the Government of India at all.

The President of India not even asked to put the Government of India in a straight jacket.

However, nothing could be achieved without sacrificing something.

In order to give effect to the Constitution of India, the President of India could have expressed his reluctance to address the joint sitting of the Parliament.

Then, the Prime Minister of India might have levelled some charges against the President of India and consequently the matter might have come to the open.

If the President of India is not allowed to do anything for freedom, he could have emailed the action taken by him to the present man.

Then the emails might have given some hope.

The failure to do this, gives the impression that the President of India dismembered the Constitution of India.

This is letter No.599

Regards

V. Sabarimuthu

5-2-2018

Letter No.598

From

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Vellicode

PIN:629167

India

To

Mr. Ram Nath Kovind

His Excellency the President of India

New Delhi

Sub: Enforcing freedom of expression –reg

The President of India is taking away the life, property and liberty of the people of India by concealing 597 letters from the eye of the people.

As the 567 letters boil down to the question of freedom, the President of India could have asked the Supreme Court of India to enforce it.

The President of India could have enforced freedom of expression through different ways.

‘I forwarded the letters to the Government, Supreme Court of India, media and the law enforcing agencies. As the President of India, I have nothing more to do’. The President of India cannot close the door of the Presidential Palace like this.

The reason is simple. The Government of India, Supreme Court of India, law enforcing agencies and the media are against freedom. They consider it as something worse than death. They stand as a unit. They have virtually made the Constitution of India an inoperative one.

Now, they simply want the Constitution of India to expire. Then, the President of India will lose his Presidential authority.

So the President of India must either enforce freedom of expression or allow the Constitution of India to expire.

Actually, the language of the Constitution of India is so strong that the President of India can ignore the Constitution of India only after its expiry.

This is letter No. 598

Regards

V. Sabarimuthu

4-2-2018

Letter No.597

From

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Vellicode

PIN:629167

India

To

Mr. Ram Nath Kovind

His Excellency the President of India

New Delhi

Sub: Enforcing freedom of expression –reg

The President of India is taking away the ‘life’ and ‘property’ of the people by concealing 596 letters in the Presidential Palace.

The Supreme Court of India exploits 1000 million people.

       When it alienates the natural resources, it exploits 1000 million people.

       When it hands over the public money like PF money to some people, it exploits 1000 million people.     

When it denies proportionate seats in educational institutions and others, it exploits 1000 million people.

When it sends small offenders to jail, it exploits 1000 million people.

When it denies pension to the people, public servants and private sector employees, it exploits 1000 million people.

When it denies freedom of expression, it exploits 1000 million people.

When it denies promotion based on date of birth seniority to the judges of the Supreme Court of India, it exploits 1000 million people.

This is worse than human trafficking that comes under Articles 23 and Article 24.

The act of taking away the ‘life’ and ‘liberty’ of the 1000 million people comes under Article 21.

The President of India must note that the actions of the judges conform to the ethical standards and the procedures of the ‘Code of Professional Responsibility’.

Regards

V. Sabarimuthu

3-2-2018

Letter No.596

From

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Vellicode

PIN:629167

India

To

Mr. Ram Nath Kovind

His Excellency the President of India

New Delhi

Sub: Enforcing freedom of expression –reg

The President of India hid 595 letters from the eye of the people.

If the President of India had made the Constitution of India an operative one, the Supreme Court of India might have issued orders to the law enforcing agencies to detain all owners of the registered newspapers and the TV channels all over India for taking away the ‘life’ and ‘liberty’ of the 1000 million people of India for the last 17 years.

The present man entered the national politics of India at least 12 years before Mr. Narendra Modi entered the national scene. Had the elections been not rigged, the people might have chosen this man as the Prime Minister of India long ago.

       The reason for this conclusion is that the people judge the leaders based on their past performance rather than based on their assurances.

       As a prime minister, Mr. Narendra Modi could have performed some wonders.

Considering all Indians as his brothers and sisters, he could have enlarged the freedom of the people and enjoyed their support.

Instead he chose the ‘We will strange you’ policy of Mr. A.B. Vajpayee and Dr. Manmohan Singh.  Thus, he blocked the flow of knowledge to the children of India as the first step.

He opened the public sector banks to his promoters as the second step. All banks became bankrupt within three years.

He concealed the money in the Provident Fund and Pension Fund as the third step.

       He has no inherent right over the natural resources of the children of India. Yet he handed over them perennially to his promoters as the fourth step.  

       Now, the State Governments have handed over the medical insurance to the various pressure groups in their States. Some, in fact, mint money. In the Union Budget for 2018-2019 presented yesterday, there is an attempt to hand over the same scheme to the manipulators in the national level.  Yet the Prime Minister is proud of his budget.    

       India is replete with intellectuals. There are many achievers in the ISRO and others.

       The present man is a common man in the street. Yet, his achievements in the Indian political sphere, law and English are sufficient to make him a household name in India. Instead, Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi is a household name in India virtually for nothing and the present man is a zero.

       The fact that he converted the present man into a zero alone is sufficient for the people to bring him to the ground level.

       India needs leaders capable of giving democracy.

For this, it is imperative that the natural resources must be restored.

       Further, anything that happened to the present man in his political life should not happen to any children in future.

       The nation must make the implementation of the ‘We will strange you’ policy impossible for the Supreme Court of India.

None shall rule India by exploiting the ignorance of the people.

       The word ‘exploitation’ is a unique word found in the Constitution of India.

       ‘His reputation will affect my reputation. Please don’t make the Constitution of India an operative one’. No prime minister can talk like this to the President of India. Article 21 prohibits this.

       The question of interpretation of the Constitution is for the President of India and the courts have no business over-ruling him/her because their interpretation of the Constitution is different from his/her.

This is letter No.596

Regards

V. Sabarimuthu

2-2-2018

             

        

Letter No.595

From

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Vellicode

PIN:629167

India

To

Mr. Ram Nath Kovind

His Excellency the President of India

New Delhi

Sub: Enforcing freedom of expression –reg

The President of India has not taken necessary action to ensure a dignified life to his subjects by showing them 594 letters.

The President of India should have sought an action taken report from the Supreme Court of India for enforcing freedom of expression.

Then the Supreme Court of India might have alerted the law enforcing agencies to detain the people responsible for concealing the letters from the eye of the people.

If the media had published the letters, thousands of Sri Lankan Tamils, people of Kashmir, Indian fishermen, militant people all over India and above all soldiers would not have been killed.

The recent death of the girl against the NEET would not have occurred..

Even Justice Karnan might not have gone to jail.

The public resources might not have been alienated.

Mr. Ramalinga Ragu might not have been divested of his Satyam Computers.

All people might have got pension. The private sector employees might have got pension on par with the public servants.

The last three elections might not have been rigged and India might not have come under the rule of Dr. Manmohan Singh and Mr. Narendra Modi.

All people might have been free from tension.

Further, the people all over India must know the rights, duties and responsibilities of the President of India, Prime Minister of India, the judges of India and the people of India.

Even the President of India needs the books written by the present man for discharging his day to day duties.

But everything remains concealed.

This has the effect of taking away the life of the people.

The Article 21 can be claimed when a person is deprived of his life or personal liberty.

This Article says that right to life includes right to life with human dignity. It clearly says that the right to life is not merely a physical right. It says that the people should not be treated like animals. It says that they must get the light of the day.

If it is enforced, the present man can enter India because he will get the protection of the people. Now there is no guarantee.

Further, Article 21 says that the people must be free from exploitation. This Article prohibits the alienation of natural resources because they are needed for the physical and mental wellbeing of the people. Other assets and seats are similarly related.

In this connection, the President of India must point out the following interpretation of the court to the learned judges of the Supreme Court of India.

Right to Reputation

Reputation is an important part of one’s life. It is one of the finer graces of human civilization that makes life worth living. The Supreme Court referring to D.F. Marion v. Minnie Davis[xiii] in Smt. Kiran Bedi v. Committee of Inquiry[xiv] held that “good reputation was an element of personal security and was protective by the Constitution, equally with the right to the enjoyment of life, liberty and property. The court affirmed that the right to enjoyment of life, liberty and property. The court affirmed that the right to enjoyment of private reputation was of ancient origin and was necessary to human society.”

This is letter No.595

       The President of India has the discretion to deal with law according his best judgement purely based on his common sense.

Regards

V. Sabarimuthu

1-2-2018

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Note:     A list of the books published by the present man through Amazon.com

1.    Atomic structure

2.    The Chemistry of the Transition Elements.

3. Atoms, Ions, Environment and Reactivity.

4.    ENGLISH GRAMMAR. This book demolishes the core area of English Grammar and supplies a new one.

5.    A NEW ENGLISH GRAMMAR FOR THE BEGINNERS. This book enables the readers to get a wonderful idea about English Grammar. It is a new grammar unknown to the English language. English grammar cannot be explained without this book.

6.    ANANTHAPADMANABHAN

7.    MOMEMTOUS MONTHS: The rule of Mr. H.D. Deve Gowda, Prime Minister of India.

8.    13 MONTHS IN OFFICE: INDIA UNDER Mr. A.B. VAJPAYEE MARCH 1998 to APRIL 1999.

9.    PRIME MINISTER Mr. A.B. VAJPAYEE AND THE ABDICATION OF POWER

10.    THE WARRINGS AMONG Dr. A.P.J. ABDUL KALAM, Dr. MANMOHAN SINGH AND Mrs. SONIA GANDHI.

11. A MADONNA OF INDIA Mrs. PRATIBHA PATIL AND THE INDIAN PRESIDENCY

Note:

Paper backs are available for books Nos. 5, 9, 10 and 11

Other books are available in the kindle version. 

All books will be converted into paper backs very soon.

Letter No.594

From

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Vellicode

PIN:629167

India

To

Mr. Ram Nath Kovind

His Excellency the President of India

New Delhi

Sub: Enforcing freedom of expression –reg

The President of India has not given freedom to the people to know the contents of the 593 letters submitted to the President of India.

The present man submitted to the President of India that the Chief Justice of India rigs the elections with the help of the media.

The act of controlling the public mind and rigging the elections is a heinous crime against all Indians.

The Supreme Court of India has now overtaken the 12 January 2018 four judge judgement. This action is in conflict with the Constitution of India and the Common Law.

This shows that the Supreme Court of India rigged the last three elections to the Indian Parliament wholesale.

The confiscation of the assets of the newspapers, periodicals and the TV channels is the smallest punishment for defeating Articles 19 and Articles 39.

In order to ensure a free and fair election in future, all owners and board of directors of the newspapers and the TV channels must be kept in prison.

Then the Government and the judges will not be frightened by freedom.

But the Supreme Court of India says, “We will strange you”.

It has been said that the ‘most important difference between civilization and savagery is the willingness of civilized men and nations to submit their differences of opinion to a factual test’.

The Supreme Court of India is not ready for it.

It simply takes unilateral decisions that are in conflict with their own law.

Therefore, it has no right to exist.

When it is customary and legitimate for the judges of the Supreme Court of India to destroy, amend, add or re-write to the Constitution of India, what the Constitution of India ought to provide to the Indians?

If nothing short of an injunction would protect the Constitution, the President of India has the power to exercise it. The only condition is that such an injunction should survive open market inspection.

Regards

V. Sabarimuthu

1.2.2018

Letter No. 593

From

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Vellicode

PIN:629167

India

To

Mr. Ram Nath Kovind

His Excellency the President of India

New Delhi

Sub: Enforcing freedom of expression –reg

The President of India has not given freedom to the people to know the contents of the 592 letters submitted to the President of India.

There are reports that the Supreme Court of India functioned normally on 29 January 2018. Apparently, they agreed to enforce the award of the President of India.

If a judge cannot punish the big offenders, he should not punish the small offenders.

The act of controlling the public mind to rig elections is more heinous than the act of committing a murder.

Every manager and every Board of Director of the newspapers and the TV channels should have been sentenced to life imprisonment for the above offence. They escaped punishment because the Chief Justice India functioned as the chief rigging master of India.

Now, they must obey the award of the President of India as they are not against the essence of the Constitution of India.

Addressing the joint sitting of the two houses of Indian Parliament, on 29 January 2018, His Excellency the President of India described Dr. B.R. Ambedkar as the architect of the Constitution of India and said that his Government would give food and water to the people.

The President of India can accept the salute of the armed forces, address the joint sitting of Parliament and live in the Presidential Palace. However, these are not the important duties of the President of India.

The Constitution of India authorizes the President of India to interpret and apply the Constitution of India.

At the same time, it denies him the power to amend, change or rewrite the Constitution of India.

The amendments to the Constitution are not actually, amendments but are – in the parlance of law – Filling the Gaps – only.

The President of India must remain as the President of India in the Presidential Palace and not as a slave of the ‘We’ in the ‘We will strange you’ policy.

The Government of India must carry out the suggestions present in the 593 letters and all other concrete suggestions of the people all over India in the coming budget. If there is any conflict between the suggestions of the people and the policies of the Government of India, one that is closest to the essence of the Constitution of India would prevail.

This is letter No. 593

Regards

V. Sabarimuthu

30 -1-2018