385; INDIA: A THIRD RATE GOVERNMENT?

385

INDIA: A THIRD RATE GOVERNMENT?

          India, all on a sudden, imposed anti-dumping duty ranging from $180 to $360 per tonne on stainless steel imported from China, South Korea and Malaysia.

          India imports about 4 lakh tonne stainless steel per year.

          The media reported this on 8 June 2015.

          It is the repercussion of the last letter.

          Why is there no similar duty on all other items?

          Further, what would the exporters get?

          The condition demands immediate devaluation of the currency.

          But the promoters of the prime minister want to take money abroad!

          China will be also unhappy.

         

          Furthermore, why can’t the government produce steel?

          Do the promoters of the prime minister prevent it?

          Or, is it because it is easier to buy rather than produce?

          Indians got Re.250/- for 1Kg of rubber.

          Now they get Re. 100/-.

          This money has no value in India.

          But it has great value to other countries.

          This condition affects all producers.

          The government must understand it.

          It must give an answer.

The armed forces killed 12 militant people at Jharkand on 9 June 2015.

The government is at war with its own people.

The motive is to hand over public resources to private parties.

On the same day, the armed forces entered Myanmar and killed about 100 militant people of Manipur.

The government pretended that it had performed some heroic action.

But Myanmar rejected the claim.

The first chapter gives a solution for the demands of Manipur.

The rest are complementary in nature.

But the government thinks that force is the remedy.

The armed forces must reckon this before killing the people.

Former Prime Minister of India Dr. Manmohan Singh, on 9 June 2015, said that Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi is a better salesman.

When he sold India to China, a person received a bribe of $ 6 billion.

It was about $ 2.5 billion when Prime Minister Mr. Modi went there.

Both must be exposed.

          A five-judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India reviewed the National Judicial Appointment Commission (NJAC) Act, 2015. The Bench comprised Justices JS. Khehar, J Chelameswar, Madan B Lokur, Kurian Jospeph and Adarsh K Goel.

The Attorney General (AG) of India, Mr. Mukel Rohatgi, on 8 June 2015, told the above Bench that the NJAC Act represents the will of the people.

Freedom is a basic feature of the Constitution of India.

This work is so important that the people must know it.

But they do not know it.

In fact, they do not know how everything happens in India.

They simply have no Freedom.

Therefore, the Parliament does not represent the will of the people.

The Bench should have told the above fact to the AG.

But it was silent.

This is because the court does not enforce freedom of expression!

The rule of law is another basic feature of the Constitution.

This means that the judges must be selected based on some rules.

Now there are no rules for selection.

If there are no rules, the selection becomes arbitrary.

 “The miseries are due to arbitrary exercise of power.

The king and the judges have no arbitrary power.

The MPs and the whole Legislature have not this.

Neither any man can hold nor can any man give this”.

Therefore the NJAC Act is a shield to cover the arbitrary power.

It is unconstitutional.

But the AG said that democracy demanded arbitrary powers.

The Bench did not question this assertion.

He said that the independence of the judiciary is a basic feature.

But he added that such decisions are not open to judicial review.

The court did not point out the contradiction. 

Then the AG said that check and balance is a basic feature. He added that the diverse composition of the NJAC would check arbitrary decision making.

Without rules, none could check arbitrary decision making.

The court failed to point out this.

After that he said that the judiciary must retain public confidence.

The court again remained silent.

He warned that the Chief Justice of India and the chief justices of High Courts should put their house in order.

He described the situation in courts as a pitiable one.

The court did not respond.

On 10 June 2015, the AG said that the collegiums system overlooked adverse Intelligence Bureau (IB) reports.

A police report, as in other cases, may be necessary after selection.

But, should the judges be selected based on the IB report?

Then he said that the Chief Justice of India had asked the chief justice of a High Court to push a particular person.

Will it not happen under the NJAC?

He said that the lawyers possessing assets disproportionate to their known sources of income were made judges.

Is it the reason for overlooking disproportionate assets?

Then the AG attacked the judges a little more directly.

The judges are inefficient.

They are undeserving.

They have no dignity and decorum.

They are the product of bad selection.

These are his words.

Then he handed over a list containing many cases of bad selection.

The list, apparently, contained the names of the sitting judges of the present Bench.

Thus, in order to impose an arbitrary method of selection, the AG used unpalatable words against the judges.

The words were used in bad faith.

A third rate government alone would do it.

This is letter No.385.

 This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 13 June 2015

13-6-2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.