387: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA: WILL IT HEAR THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE?

387

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:

DOES IT HEAR THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE?

The Supreme Court of India, on 15 June 2015, slightly changed its stand on the National Judicial Appointment Commission (NJAC) Act.

The court asked whether the State Assemblies debated the Act or not.

Thus, it wanted to catch the government red handed.

Did the government hoodwink the court?

Curiously, the court did not take it to its logical conclusion.

It did not even ask the Solicitor General (SG) to file an affidavit.

         

          Attorney General (AG) Mr. Mukel Rohatgi, was not seen on Monday.

          He was substituted by Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar.

          No explanation was given for the substitution.

          But he reappeared on Wednesday.

A judge wanted to revive the old system.

          The SG said that the collegiums system would not be revived.

          The Supreme Court Bar Association attacked the collegiums system.

          It said that the Chief Justices do not send reply to the letters.

          But it did not explain the constitutionality of the NJAC.

Justice Khehar wanted the advocates to suggest a better system.

They did not give any proper reply.

         

          Apart from these, the media covered up everything.

          The proceedings were not properly reported.

          A  Justice Khehar must be given a reply.

          Any government would make laws with a view to its own interests.

          The prime minister is free to make any law for selection.

          He must leave it to the officers to execute it.

          The law maker should not execute it.

          Thus, he cannot substitute law by will.

         

The Chief Justice of India is also bound by law.

He cannot make any law and execute the same.

Therefore, the collegiums system is also unconstitutional.

 Justice Khehar must demand new laws for selection.

Now, the Parliament does not represent the will of the nation.

However, it is a different matter.

The arguments show that the government wants frauds as judges.

Such judges must allow plunder and rapine by denying Freedom.

This cannot be a law.

Therefore, the government wants the NJAC for one or two months.

The prime minister would sit in a room to select about 300 frauds.

After that the situation would change.

A plunder of unimaginable proportion is going on in India.

This is the reason for concealing this work.

The Supreme Court has failed to prevent it.

If prevented, India will be a different nation.

Therefore, it must either prevent it or give Freedom.

This is not to make this writer a great man at all.

Does it hear the voice of the people?

This is letter No.387.

 This email is being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 18 June 2015

18-6-2015.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.