Tuesday, April 2, 2019

Letter No. 714


From
V. Sabarimuthu
26-3 Vellicode
Mulagumoodu P.O. 629167
To
All judges
The Supreme Court of India
New Delhi
Your Excellency
        There are reports that the public sector State Bank of India (SBI) is to buy 24 per cent shares of Jet Airways.
        This is out and out unconstitutional. The banks exist for lending money and not to buy the shares of the companies of the promoters of the political leaders or the judges of the Supreme Court of India.
        The motive is to give a huge amount of public money to the Jet Airways to save it from bankruptcy and sell the shares back after some time. The public sector banks refused to do the same when the Kingfisher Airlines of Mr. Mallya and the Satyam Computers of Mr. Rama Linga Raju frantically ran for money. In fact, an arrest warrant is pending against the former and the latter was mercilessly sent to jail.
        The SBI lends money to the people all over India only for interest. The act of buying the shares of preferred companies and the act of denying the same benefit to others is a violation of the Article 14 and many other sections of the Constitution of India. The tragedy is that the Government alienates the public assets for money after giving the public money to some people like this.
        The act of advancing public money to buy the shares of some companies is illegal because others do not get the same benefit. When the present man sent letters to the newspapers, they refused to publish them. Therefore, it was one of the points in the first letter dated 1-6-2001.
        The then President of India, Dr. Abdul Kalam, and his successor, Mrs. Pratibha Devi Singh Patil, virtually stopped this unconstitutional policy decision. But, whenever the present man remains silent, the Supreme Court of India plunders the public money like this. Can any man live for ever to police such actions?
        If a war had broken out between India and Pakistan, such things might not have come to the surface although hundreds of manipulations happen every day. As the people focus their attentions on the elections, such manipulations take place with greater intensity.
        The tragedy of all tragedies is that the Prime Minister of India says that he is functioning like a police man to prevent such acts. But the people - in all their innocence - trust the patriotism of such politicians.
        Evidently, all works done by the present man go in vain because the people have no freedom to know men and matters.
        Therefore, the Supreme Court of India exists only to plunder the public resources by denying freedom to Indians. It comes under the principle of unjust enrichments. All parties that amass wealth like this at the expense of others should be required to make restitution.
Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, in an absurd judgement, on 27 September 2012, said that he lacked the expertise to understand the economic policy. In the same judgement he said that he would strike down arbitrariness in policy decisions. This kind of conflict could be discerned in all his crucial judgements.
The people tend to look at the past judgements of a judge to know his fairness. If a judge is not fair, no good adjudication can be expected.
Now, there is a real possibility that the present Chief Justice of India would do injustice only. This means that he would not adjudicate these letters in an impartial way.
The other judges may not be open to such severe criticism. One cannot say that the appearance of bias against freedom permeates among all judges. There must be some exceptional judges. However, there is no way to test their impartiality except through this work. Their personal and business background are not known. Their affiliations are also not known. The only thinking is that they would not deliberately try to please some politicians and business men at the expense of 1300 million absent class citizens.
This is a critical moment in the history of India. Therefore, the judges must view this work with an open eye and adjudicate the letters before them objectively.
The President of India also must act as swiftly as possible to prevent the total annihilation of the Constitution of India. He could prevent a war between India and Pakistan through his swift action. Now, he can ensure economic and political justice, if he is ready to act with the same alacrity.
This is letter No.714
This letter is being submitted to the President of India and the judges of the Supreme Court of India through email on March 21, 2019.
V. Sabarimuthu
INDIA
21-3-2019

No comments: