Letter No. 718

From

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. 629167

India

To

All judges

Supreme Court of India

New Delhi

Your Excellency

         The Bloomberg, on 23 March 2019, said, “The foundation of corporate structure in India is cracking. A fresh coat of paint alone won’t suffice”.

         The opinion gives the impression that the President of India would grant freedom to Indians.

         The present absent class citizen has submitted 717 letters to the Supreme Court of India since June 2001.

         The objective of submitting the letters is not to function as an advice giver, extra-constitutional authority or a policeman but to secure freedom to the people.

         Therefore, the grievance is nothing but the denial of freedom to Indians.

         What is the consequence of denial of freedom?

         The denial of freedom leads to the formation of non-civilian governments.

         What is the meaning of the word ‘grievance’?

         For an Indian, anything that conflicts with the Constitution of India is a grievance.

         The present man says that the Supreme Court of India did not adjudicate 717 letters as per Article 39(a) and promulgate their awards as per Article 19. If it is correct, it a grievance.

         This grievance cannot be adjudicated by the Prime Minister of India, other political leaders, Election Commission of India or the High Courts. The Supreme Court of India alone can do it. As it is overburdened with letters, the present man pointed out the standard method adopted by the judiciary all over the world to adjudicate such issues. The method is: concede all the constitutional demands of the petitioner.

         If the court is obdurate in its refusal to adjudicate the subject matter, the President of India would be constrained to give his final award. There is no other authority to resolve this.

         Imagine that the present man indulges in some wrong doing. Someone might lodge a complaint. If the wrongdoing is in conflict with the Constitution of India, the police would arrest him within 24 hours.

         The present man cannot claim any immunity saying that he saved many Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) from privatisation or wrote several books or even saved the people from a probable Indo- Pak war. The fact that he wrote 717 letters in 18 years for the freedom of Indians also would not be a sufficient ground for immunity.

         Similarly, the learned judges of the Supreme Court of India are very powerful people. They are so powerful that the media is not ready to utter a word about them even if they commit the greatest of all crimes.

         But the moment the President of India gives his oral or written award to the complaint lodged by the present man, the learned judges would go to jail for their refusal to adjudicate as per Article 39(a) and promulgate their awards as per Article 19.

         If the President of India refuses to gives his award, a non-civilian government would come to power for the fourth time in succession and would keep him in the Presidential Palace as its slave.

         This is letter No.718

         This letter is being submitted to the President of India and the Supreme Court of India through two separate emails.

V. Sabarimuthu

25- 3- 2019

India.