Letter No. 719

From

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. 629167

India

To

All judges

Supreme Court of India

New Delhi

Your Excellency

         The Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi. on 25 March 2019, urged the prominent personalities to inspire the people to vote.

         He alienated the public resources to favour his promoters. If he had done it in good faith for the well-being of the people, he could have done so after enlarging the freedom of the people. As he deliberately wanted to steal public assets, he could not enlarge the freedom.

         Prior to this, Mr. Rahul Gandhi, did the same for 10 long years through Dr. Manmohan Singh.

         As Mr. Narendra Modi and Dr. Manmohan Singh did not head any civilian government. They engaged in war or created unwanted tension with the neighbouring countries to plunder public assets. Now, they do not allow others to tell this to the people.

         As they proved dangerous to the nation, they are the two ‘sore spots’ of the system.

         Therefore, the people need a civilian government.

         When the Supreme Court of India adjudicates the cases as per Articles 39 (a) and 19, the people would come to know the things that are in conflict with the Constitution of India and that they would hear men and matters according to degree. This would enable them to form a perspective for voting. Instead of doing this, the people are blindfolded and steered to the polling booths like animals and are being forced to vote for the representatives of the manipulators. It is worse than catching them using a rat trap.

         The people would point out this to the judges. The latter must have an analytical mind and must be able to orient quickly when dealing with vital subject matters raised by the people. But they simply refuse to give heed to weighty issues. If heard, they fear, that the unconstitutional manipulations would be curbed to the disadvantage of their promoters. Therefore, they have not even expressed their willingness to give adequate attention to the matter raised by the present absent class citizen.     

         The judges should have complied with Article 39(a) because it is the ‘safety valve’ of the Constitution of India. Then their adjudication might have made the present man the Prime Minister of India long ago.

         There exists an erroneous belief that the grievance of the present man is of a personal nature. It is not at all true. It is the general grievance of the 1300 million absent class citizens.

         If the President of India ignores this, he simply denies the democratic rights of 1300 million people. The loss to the present man is a small one but the principle is very large.

         Therefore, President of India stands between emancipation and total slavery.

         He must settle the issues that involve a broad question of law at the earliest because complaints often shrink in importance and are easily disposed of once they are brought into the open. Nothing could be achieved through secret moves. The source of his strength would not be the Constitution of India after the formation of a non-civilian government.

         This letter No.719

         This letter is being submitted to the President of India and all judges of the Supreme Court of India.

V. Sabarimuthu

India

26-3-2019