Letter No.1156

From

SabarimuthuVyakappan

26- Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. 629167,

India.

To

The International Criminal Court

The Hague.

Your Excellency

          The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), on 16 May 2023, said, “Those in Western journalism and politics who have, the past year, shown sympathy for Mr. Putin’s position, or who have made arguments he has agreed with, or who have expressed public skepticism about the Western response in Ukraine. They might have some pull here.”

Further, it said, “They(reporters) want to tell the people what they have a right to know about the world they live in.”

          These letters fit well with the above requirement. Therefore, if the WSJ acts in good faith, it can report the contents of the four letters (submitted to it by the present world citizen). After all, it says that the reporters have a right to tell the people their surroundings.

A Russian court, on 18 April 2023, decided to keep WSJ reporter Mr. Evan Gershkovich in custody until May 29.

Everyone is entitled to have his own view on the Ukraine issue. However, the Constitution of Soviet Union is an immortal one like the Constitution of the USA. This is what the law says.

If the WSJ is serious about his release, it can publish these letters. Then the Ukraine war will end within two weeks, and Russia will release him within a month. There is a possibility for success.

 

President of Brazil Mr. Lula, on 18 April 2023, suggested that a group of countries not involved with the Ukraine war mediate between Ukraine and Russia.

Russia welcomed anything consistent with its interest.

 

The Supreme Court of India function-as usual- with illegal judges.

It is illegal.

Arbitrary selection of judges makes the acceptor beholden to the donor.

It is the reason why the illegal judges are killers of liberty. They have killed a generation of people. They treated them like dogs. They are killing another generation.

The victims -1400 million people- remain conscious but cannot move or ask for help nor stop the slow paralysis overtaking their body!

Therefore, President of India Mrs. Droupadi Murmu must subject them to law enforcement.

 

The Members of Parliament (M.Ps.) must respect the Constitution of India. When they amend it, they make it an illegitimate one.

If the Constitution of India wins, it will make them illegitimate.

The presidential election makes the President of India beholden to the illegal voters. As she protects them, the Constitution of India remains as an illegitimate one. This condition should not continue even for a minute.

Such fighting opportunities come to some people unsought, opening for them the doors of the heavenly planets.

Therefore, she shall not hesitate to do the duty the Constitution prescribed to her.

 

As she fails, the International Criminal Court (ICC) must do its duty.

The Constitution of the Soviet Union is an immutable one. This is what the law says. Therefore, the ICC must withdraw the arrest warrant issued against President of Russia Mr. Vladimir Putin, and then issue arrest warrant against the illegal judges and the M.Ps. guilty of voting for amending the Constitution of India.

 

This is letter No. 1156 dated 19-4-2023. It is addressed to the International Criminal Court (ICC). It is the nineth appeal to the ICC. It is the one hundred and tenth appeal to the International Court of Justice. It is the hundred and ninety seventh appeal to HEAVEN.

A copy is submitted to the President of India, President of the USA, Vice President of the USA, Chancellor of Germany, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Afghanistan, Prime Minister of England Mrs. Liz Truss, former Prime Minister of England Mr. Boris Johnson, former Chancellor of England Mr. Rishi Sunak M.P.  Mr. United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Supreme Court of the UK, Prime Minister of Canada Mr. Justin Trudeau, Leader of the Labour Party UK Sir Keir Starmer, UN, Prime Minister of Israel. Foreign Minister of Poland, Foreign Minister of Russia, Wall Street Journal and some embassies.

SabarimuthuVyakappan

India

19-4-2023

 Letter No.1155

From

SabarimuthuVyakappan

26- Thattankonam

Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. 629167,

India.

To

The International Criminal Court

The Hague.

Your Excellency

A media report, on 15 April 2023, said, “Russian President has displayed Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s photo in his office…a great honour for India.” 

The media showed the image also. It may be fake or true. No one knows the truth.

However, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar is not a celebrity in India. Those guilty of amending the Constitution of India are the celebrities in India although they pay floral tribute to him as a show.

Hungary, on 15 April 2023, asked the NATO countries to stop funding Ukraine.

Hungary and Poland banned Ukraine wheat to protect domestic farmers.

Does Poland change its Ukraine policy? The present world citizen submitted the last few letters to the foreign minister of Poland.

Slovakia also banned Ukraine wheat but sent 13 MiG fighter jets to Ukraine.

Many countries still support Ukraine due to the ignorance of the law.

Russia warned that any supply of fighter jets to Ukraine would be construed as direct war against Russia.

 

Russia arrested Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reporter Mr. Evan Gershkovich on espionage allegations. This happened about 15 days ago. He was accredited to work as journalist in Russia at the time of detention. The USA denied the allegation and vowed to do everything possible for his release.

The WSJ said, “They (journalists) want to tell the people what they have a right to know about the world they live in. That is why you break the story, unearth the lie, ask questions, tell the yarn. You are trying in your way to make the world more just”

Therefore, the present world citizen submitted the copies of 3 letters (Letter No.1151,1152 and 1153) to the WSJ although there exists a worldwide conspiracy to deny liberty.

 

Former President of Russia Mr.Dimitry Medvedev, on 15 April 2023,  said, “Poland will disappear in a Russia vs NATO war.”

The NATO countries send unlimited weapons to Ukraine to kill Russian soldiers. Thousands of soldiers have died. However, the NATO countries have not suffered any loss of life or limb. He talks like this due to exasperation.

The Constitution of Soviet Union is the Sovereign. It is the best will of every citizen of Soviet Union. As it is their (President Mr. Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s and President Mr. Vladimir Putin’s) own best will, they must always obey it. In fact, it is the only authority that can legitimately coerce them, for it is their own will coming back to them. They do not recognize it as such is a different matter.

Now, the international community must compel them to obey the Constitution of Soviet Union. As it fails in its duty, India and many other countries reels under illegitimate governments.

Ukraine and Russia have lost thousands of soldiers. Ukraine must give up the fight and stop the slaughter.

The media has a duty to tell the truth to make the world more just. However, it conceals these letters.

Therefore, the NATO countries are taking the world to Stone Age with deadly weapons.

 

Senior Supreme Court of India judge Mr. Dushyant Dave, on 16 April 203, in a letter to the Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi, said, “If you fail, India will recede into anarchy, from which it will take a long time to recover.”

The judges must keep the people as human beings. Then, they will act in a rational way. Liberty is a must for it.

 

A bench of the Supreme Court of India on 15 April 2023, said, “Unintentional mistake.”

Everyone commits mistakes. It is not a mistake. No man wants their regret or remorse either. They must make amends for all illegalities committed by them, and must ensure liberty to Indians. They must treat Indians as human beings, not dogs.

They can fight for their survival. However, they think that they can escape the disgrace of deposition and capitulation only by denying liberty. Alternatively, they think that it is the only way to conserve the robbed assets.

Their dogged resistance to appoint legal judge shows that they are not ready to budge an inch.

 

Chief Justice of India DY. Chandrachud, on 15 April 2023, said, “Mediate not litigate.”

There are thousands of killers of liberty -judges, political leaders and media persons. They don’t use conventional weapons for this. Apparently, the Chief Justice of India keeps his thumb in a critical nerve to kill the liberty of the people.

Even if the President of India investigates the investigators, it is not easy to locate the critical nerve responsible for killing the liberty of 1400 million people.

 

The Supreme Court of India functions - as usual- with illegal judges.

It is illegal.

Knowledge is wealth. Assume that one half of 1400 million people of India have knowledge about this work. Then, there will be 700 million people in India with as much knowledge as the present citizen. What do they want more?

When the President of India transmits these letters to the Chief Justice of India with her comments, the judges are obligated to disclose them to the people. The Government and the law enforcement agencies also must do it.

However, they deny liberty. It happens because the Government appoints judges arbitrarily.

Arbitrary power is a thing that neither any man can hold nor any man can give.

Therefore, the illegal judges shall not hold any judicial power even for a minute.

 

The Government has no arbitrary power to amend the Constitution of India. However, it amended it more than one hundred times. The present citizen pointed out the illegality. Even then it amended it. It now resists the authority of the President of India and rules India. It is illegal.

The Election Commission of India (ECI) conducts election by denying liberty to the people to see these letters. It is also illegal.

President of India Mrs. Drupadi Murmu has a special duty as the President of India. There is no better engagement for her than fighting to protect the Constitution of India and the law. Therefore, she must subject the guilty judges, political leaders and the media persons to law enforcement.

However, she fails. It is a crime against humanity.

The International Criminal Court has duty to tell the truth. It must withdraw the arrest warrant against President of Russia Mr. Vladimir Putin and issue arrest warrant against the illegal judges and the Members of Parliament (M.Ps) guilty of amending the Constitution of India.

 

This is letter No. 1155 dated 18-4-2023. It is addressed to the International Criminal Court (ICC). It is the eighth appeal to the ICC. It is the one hundred and nineth appeal to the International Court of Justice. It is the hundred and ninety sixth appeal to HEAVEN.

A copy is submitted to the President of India, President of the USA, Vice President of the USA, Chancellor of Germany, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Afghanistan, Prime Minister of England Mrs. Liz Truss, former Prime Minister of England Mr. Boris Johnson, former Chancellor of England Mr. Rishi Sunak M.P.  Mr. United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Supreme Court of the UK, Prime Minister of Canada Mr. Justin Trudeau, Leader of the Labour Party UK Sir Keir Starmer, UN, Prime Minister of Israel. Foreign Minister of Poland, Foreign Minister of Russia, Wall Steet Journal and some embassies.

SabarimuthuVyakappan

India

18-4-2023

Letter No.724

From

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Vellicode

Mulagumoodu 629167

To

All judges

The Supreme Court of India

New Delhi

Your Excellency

The President of India has afforded a reasonable period of time to the judges to rectify the error.

The common questions of law and fact related to this work include whether the refusal of the judges of the Supreme Court of India to adjudicate 723 petitions violates Article 39 (a), and whether it is constitutional on the part of the President of India to conduct an election to the Indian Parliament – by denying the benefits of Article 19 of the Constitution of India to the people.

The court and the President of India must have noticed that the issues applicable to all citizens predominate over individual issues.

But the court has not even adopted a test to determine whether common issues predominate over individual issues or not.

Everyone knows that rights may be affected by the law suits pending in the courts. Now, the constitutional rights of the people are affected by the non-adjudication of the 723 letters.

The judges refuse to adjudicate them because of the national court-wide conspiracy to rule and plunder India by denying the benefits of Article 19 of the Constitution of India.

Therefore, they hesitate to give injunctive relief directing the Election Commission of India (ECI) to conduct the elections after giving freedom to the people. Their inaction is unconstitutional and it is tantamount to financial suicide. They simply function like the worst terrorists.

   No other citizen of India might have approached the President of India with similar demands. But he has a fiduciary duty to ensure that the interests of the absent class citizens are pursued fully.

Therefore, he can urge the learned judges of the Supreme Court of India to function like judges and discharge their fiduciary responsibilities.

Or, place them under suspension

Or, terminate their services.

Or ask the competent authority to file the First Information Report (FIR) against the judges

Or place his difficulties before the people for open market inspection.

This is letter No. 724

This letter is being submitted to the President of India and to all judges of the Supreme Court of India

V. Sabarimuthu

India

3 -4- 2019

Letter No.723

From

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. 629167

To

All judges

The Supreme Court of India

New Delhi

Excellencies

        The ZEE TV- an Indian TV channel- on 29 March 2019, reported that Pakistan committed three ceasefire violations in the Poonch district of Jammu & Kashmir. The Times of India reported that there were 12 violations. The Indian army spokesperson did not report anything.

        It is pertinent to recall the word of Boland that “It is the mark of civilization that men present reasons rather than arms”. India and Pakistan must disclose their reasons for their stand in this matter to the public inspection.

Union Finance Minister Mr. Arun Jaitely, on 30 March 2019, said, “A strong economy can enable redistribution of its large resources in order to reduce poverty. Only growth can service the poor”.

        He does not represent even 10 right thinking people in India. He cannot continue as a minister in an atmosphere of freedom. He says that India would flow with honey and milk if he is allowed to plunder the public resources for some more time.

        He talks like a stranger to the Constitution of India

        1300 million people of India do not expect redistribution of money earned by anyone by his own merit.

 But the Government should not deprive 1300 million people of their benefits in violation of Article 39(b) of the Constitution of India. In fact, the people are entitled to restitution of the lost benefits. A fair and efficient adjudication is the only need of the hour. Until then, all Union Ministers – present and past-must be detained.

        Some construct stories like this. “The Constitution of India was not drafted by the people for the benefit of the people. It was drafted by seven men. They were:

1.      Dr. B R Ambedkar (chairman)

2.     N Gopalaswamy Ayyangar

3.     Alladi Krinshnaswamy Ayyar

4.     Dr. K M Munshi

5.     Syed Mohammad Saadullah

6.     N Madhav Rau (he replaced B L Mittal who resigned due to ill health)

7.     T T Krishnamachri (he replaced D P Khitan who died in 1948).

 Dr. B.R. Ambedkar – a person from the Scheduled Caste was the chairman. The Muslim member, Mr. Syed Mohamed Saadullah, went to Pakistan. The rest were Brahmins. Therefore, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar had to obey them. The pen alone belonged to Dr. Ambedkar and the ink belonged to them. Even Ambedkar said that he would be the first person to set fire to the Constitution of India, if permitted”.

But it is a unique constitution. No other constitution bestows benefits to the whole as the Indian constitution. Article 39 alone is sufficient to prove it.  Therefore, all the seven members are like saints and they must be worshipped. One shall not take a prejudiced view against the members of the Brahmin community in this matter. The Indians do not know this. The Supreme Court of India would not allow the people to know it because the opinion emanates from the present man. It is simply individualizing everything.

Article 39 is the nerve centre of the Constitution of India. It has six Sections. For the time being, let us take 39(b) and 39(a)

According to the Section 39(b) “the ownership and control of the material resources of the community are so distributed as best to sub-serve the common good.”

As per this section, the natural resources must remain with the government.

The Supreme Court of India must give effect to this. It has no right to modify, correct or change this section.

   When the judges obliterate this section, the people can write it to the Supreme Court of India and obtain relief.  The court must adjudicate it under Section 39(a). Only if it is adjudicated, the judges can be called justices.

Further, their opinion will become law - called judges law or common law- only when it is duly promulgated.

When the BALCO judgement defrauded the people of benefits under the Constitution of India, the present man told the then Chief Justice of India that he broke the Constitution of India from within. The court should have adopted a single test to determine whether issues applicable to all citizens predominated over individual issues or not. But he individualized the issue and hesitated to administer the benefits of the Constitution to the people.

If the people had known this, they might have thrown the judges and the government into the Indian Ocean long ago.

The court is individualizing the issues even after 722 letters.

1300 million people would place the demand before the President of India, provided they know this. They would seek an injunctive relief to protect their constitutional benefits

The present man fixed the omnipotent judges of the Supreme Court of India because they refused to adjudicate the letters although the strength of Article 39 (a) of the Constitution of India, hard work, perseverance, intuition and the chances bestowed by nature contributed to it. Anyhow, a citizen of India – an ordinary man in the street- has achieved the ultimate in the Indian politics. Anything to be achieved would be a bonus. Everyone can be proud of it. That is why, the present citizen is now the sovereign of the nation. The Chief Justice of India need not envy at this.

There can be no doubt that the judges of the Supreme Court of India refuse to act on grounds generally applicable to the judges. Therefore, they seek the help of the media mafia for their survival. They must introspect, whether they should remain for the promotion of the media mafia or for the 1300 million people.

Their acts and omissions affected all citizens as a whole in the same manner.

   Now, the issue arises out of a single act of the defendants ie judges – the refusal to adjudicate 722 petitions.

A single action of the President of India under the Constitution of India will provide the most effective and efficient mechanism for redressing the defendants (judges) unlawful conduct.

This Letter No.723

V. Sabarimuthu

India

2-4- 2019.

       

Letter No. 722

From

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Vellicode

Mulagumoodu P.O. 629167

To

All judges

Supreme Court of India

New Delhi

Your Excellency

        India, on 28 March 2019, expressed its disappointment over the refusal of Pakistan to take immediate, credible and irreversible action against the terror groups at 22 pin locations.

        The contention of India is not a genuine one because Pakistan is willing to allow “Indian visits” on request.

        Further, India lamented that Pakistan refuses to acknowledge Pulwama as a terror attack.

        The above statement also is not a true one.

        Notwithstanding everything, India and Pakistan could make the present line of control as the permanent boundary. This might inhibit the growth of terror groups in Pakistan. The Government of India and the Government of Pakistan must say whether they are agreeable to this suggestion or not.

        The Supreme Court India, on 27 March 2019, conducted a farewell function to Justice A.K. Sikri. Many judges and advocates of the Supreme Court and Delhi High Court attended the function.

        Addressing the function, Attorney General of India Venugopal mentioned Articles 7, 32 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

        Article 32 says that a citizen of India can approach the courts for the violation of his fundamental rights.

        He mentioned many fundamental rights but he chose not to mention the right to information as a fundamental right.

        Chief Justice of India Justice Ranjan Gogoi said, “Great institutions are built on the imprints of people who demonstrate by example. The good deeds and good thoughts are indeed the basis on which institutions strive and grow. This cannot be any truer than it is for the judiciary.

The judiciary as an institution grows on the faith and trust reposed upon it by the people. Judiciary as an institution has a direct interface with the citizenry at all levels. The judges and lawyers are like other faces of the institution.

        It would not be difficult to understand that the judiciary has always grown in the shadows of outstanding personalities whose good deeds and thought have illuminated the path of the billion citizens.

        It is indeed a proud privilege to address this august gathering. The people have come all together to bid farewell to one of the finest among us. A human being who has come to epitomize goodness - always demonstrated invaluable contribution - that goodness of conduct and thought makes to the growth of our institution. Justice Sikri brought fresh insights into the institution.

        I want to describe with some remarkable words Justice Sikri himself used in a case. ‘It is better to be unique than the best because being the best makes a man the number one. But being unique makes you the only one”

        Justice A.K.Sikri, in his farewell address, said, “With power comes responsibility. I believe that wisdom comes from all corners.

There is a prayer which every judge must know. I recite it regularly. Since judges discharge a divine function, I believe that justice is divine. A judge in his prayer is praying to God to be merciful to him so that he is able to administer justice. I will read a portion which goes like this, and I quote, ‘I, mean this day, fulfil all my duties in thy fear and fall into no error of judgement. Give me grace to hear patiently, to consider diligently, to understand rightly and to decide justly. Grant me due sense of humility and I am not to be misled by my wilfulness, vanity and egoism’.

Then, we should remember that we are confronted with difficult cases. We must decide those cases as well. I feel that many times we are confronted with difficult cases. We cannot shy away from them. Judging is one function- (looking at the face of the Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi)-where we cannot avoid taking decisions. We have to do that.

But judges are not morals or intellectual giants, or prophets or calculating machines. We are all human workers. But here intuition plays an important role. I can see with some sense of authority and experience that most of the judges are able to develop extra-ordinary intuitive powers which normally lead them to right decisions. On such occasions, to listen to my intuitions is to identify with my entire awareness, experience or just with my conscience perceptions. My total synthesis into a calm sense of direction coupled with reason shows my right path. I don’t know how far I have succeeded. I have always kept in my mind a pragmatic approach. I always tried to balance conflicting interests. I always tried to acquire a sense of justice. In the process, I have endeavoured to learn from many judges. Justice Benjamin’s ‘Fundamental Duties of a Judge in a Democracy’ and the books like “How Judges Decide”----- 21 celebrated judgements of the Supreme Court of USA….

        I may disclose here that even at this age, 65, there is a child in me. It has kept me in some kind of innocence. This innocence ensures that there is no malice towards anyone and that helps in doing justice.

        Let me make another confession today. By nature, a part of me is feminine. I am of the opinion that in order to do justice one should possess some elements of feminist. After all, the symbol of justice is a goddess ie a female form. No doubt she is shown blindfolded. However, her heart is not shut from where emanates the qualities of imparting justice. It teaches that everyone may not be nice but there is something nice in everything.

        Never keep a fixed image for everyone because people act differently in different situations. It helps in hearing the qualities of justice. Justice which has the attribute of compassion is a female attitude. I will instil the desire of sensitivity which is required in various types of cases and in various circumstances. It is well known that women have six senses including the pragmatic sense…….

        God has made each one of us unique and designed us for a special purpose in life. When we find a purpose, accept it and put all our efforts to fulfil it to find contentment…….

        I have a desire to be more than I am. A desire to increase the boundaries of myself, a desire to feel more, learn more and a desire to grow……

        There was a mild debate over whether a judge shall smile or not.  That is not important. If at all, it is a secondary issue. The test of a good and successful judge is –(looking at the face Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi)- how many smiles are brought on the hapless faces. That is the test”.

       

        Anyone would tell Justice A.K. Sikri is not satisfied with the stand taken by the Supreme Court of India on Article 39(a).

        All constitutions contain provisions for grievance redressals.

        A citizen of India has an inherent right to present his grievances before the Supreme Court of India directly. He has a right to be free from the unfair or irrelevant or invidious treatment of advocates. Therefore, it is not necessary that a citizen must file a writ petition under Article 32 through an advocate. 

        A citizen of India can write letters to the Supreme Court of India for the rectification of its constitutional violations.

        Then, the court must exercise its discretion with complete good faith and honesty to avoid arbitrary conduct.

        But the court has arbitrarily and capriciously failed to adjudicate the letters. It is nothing but breach of statutory duty. Even Justice A.K.Sikri agrees with it

        There are 720 letters. But the dominant theme is not a complex one. The dominant theme is that one among the 1300 million voiceless people approaches the Supreme Court of India. A simple judgement of the court will be equivalent to 1300 million judgements.

        The installation of any government to the exclusion of 1300 million people is an unconstitutional one. The new government would be as illegitimate as the present one. It would not survive in an atmosphere of freedom.

        If these letters come to the notice of the people, the judges cannot escape. Why should a court and a government function like this?

        A citizen of India is not going to write 720 letters to the President of India to police the Constitution of India in future. In this respect, it is a unique work.

But the issue that lies at the core of the letters is not unique or special to the present plaintiff.

There exits an unlawful scheme to prevent 1300 million people from attaining the benefits of Article 19 of the Constitution of India.

Therefore, the claims of all citizens are the same. All arise out of same set of factual circumstances. Whether each citizen of India has been wrongly deprived of benefits pursuant to Article 19 of the Constitution of India or not is the question.

The Supreme Court of India might contend that the deprivation was done by common corporate act. But it refuses to give any prospective injunctive relief!

No other citizen has approached the President of India for the benefits under Article 19. Therefore, the President of India has a fiduciary duty to see that the interests of 1300 million absent class citizens are fairly and adequately protected by him in their absence.

This is letter No.722

This letter is submitted to the President of India and the Supreme Court of India through email

V. Sabarimuthu

India

30-3-2019.

Letter 721

From

V. Sabarimuthu

26-3 Vellicode

Mulagumoodu 629197

India

To

All judges

The Supreme Court of India

New Delhi

Your Excellency

        Mr. Vijay Mallya of Kingfisher Airlines, on 27 March 2019, deplored that the mechanism adopted to solve the Jet Airways was not applied to him and he lost everything. He added that the banks were not ready to accept even the repayments to clear the loan taken by him.

        The Government of India had asked the public sector State Bank of India (SBI) to buy 24% shares of the Jet Airways by giving a huge amount of money. In fact, the SBI was all set to buy 24% shares of the Jet Airways. Apparently, the present President of India intervened to prevent the unconstitutional manipulations. Finally, the SBI took over the Jet Airways.

What the present man knows is his letter in this regard and the result. What happened in between is an imagination only. Mr. Mallya may not be aware of it.

The SBI is now open for further manipulations. As there is no civilian government, everything depends on the stand taken by the President of India.

The source of authority of the President of India is the Constitution of India.

President Mr. K.R. Narayanan wanted to prevent the Public Sector Banks and the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) from advancing money to some favoured companies in the pretext of buying their shares. He went to the Supreme Court of India for it. But the judges told him not to interfere in the affairs of the judiciary. He stood like a poor man at the gate and returned. Thus, he failed. But he expressed the hope that the “common man” would save the country. He utilized a public meeting at Pune to tell it to the people.

Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam and Mrs. Pratibha Devisingh Patil virtually restrained the banks and the LIC from advancing money to any companies in the pretext of buying their shares.

Mr. Pranab Mukherjee allowed them to buy the shares of those companies that were moulding the public thought in India.

The present President of India has, for the first time, restrained the Government and, therefore, the SBI from buying the shares of the Jet Airways.

Evidently, the amount of authority the President of India hold depends upon the capability of the President of India. Some want to prevent manipulations, some restrict it and some condescend it.

It is a very sensitive area because this money has the potential to raise any private companies with suitable connections to great heights. When this happens, other companies simply perish due to interest burden.

 When the present man asked former Prime Minister of India Mr. A.B. Vajpayee to curtail the unconstitutional manipulations, he said that the “demon would be eliminated”

Though the present man still lives, hundreds of attempts were made to eliminate him. Even now, the Supreme Court of India is not ready to adjudicate the letters because it knew that no absent class citizen could fight for ever.

India, on 27 March 2019, shot down one of its satellites in space with an anti-satellite missile (A-SAT). India is the fourth country in the world to successfully conduct this test. It is a scientific achievement of the Indian Défense Research and Development Organization (DRDO).

The Prime Minister of Pakistan, Mr. Imran Khan, on 27 March 2019, said, “My country would no longer allow terror groups to organize in the Pakistani soil. We cannot afford to be blamed for any terrorist activity like what happened in Pulwama.

We are already cracking down on them - we are already dismantling the whole set-up. What is happening right now had never happened before in Pakistan. I am still apprehensive – before the election in India- I feel that something could happen - I feel that Mr. Modi used Pulwama attack to build this war hysteria.

The Indian public should realize that it is all for winning the election. It has nothing to do with the real issues of the subcontinent”.

Whatever happened, it is good for both countries. The terrorists did not succeed in triggering a war. The statement of Prime Minister of Pakistan shows that India and Pakistan are in for a new phase of peaceful co-existence.

The feeling of the present man is that India would not wage a war with Pakistan in the near future notwithstanding one or two freak terrorist attacks.

A little bit of transparency might solve the problem.  Everyone tells that Kashmir is the real problem. But none in India knows the real issues in it. Pakistan can reveal them through the media to enlighten the people.

The President of India must note that there exists a nation-wide and national court-wide conspiracy to deny freedom of expression. The Supreme Court of India induces the media to accomplish it. ‘Write whatever you want. We will never allow the people to know it. We will see that no man reads your books also. We have the power to subvert Article 39(a)’. This is the stand taken by the Supreme Court of India to 720 letters.

The court does this not to this present man but to 1300 million people. It could be any citizen of India.

The wars that India fought in the past could be attributed to the denial of freedom of expression in India.

The judges of the Supreme Court of India revel in installing one non-civilian government after another by denying the rights of the citizens under Articles 39 (a) and 19.

Their action converts them into the worst terrorists in India. Their terrorism is more devastating than the nuclear devices.

They could be sentenced to not less than ten life terms. But the Indians have to live them.

Therefore, the Supreme Court of India must restrain all non-civilian governments from engaging in any war with the neighbouring countries for any unjust gain.

Now the present President of India has acquired sufficient experience. He has closely observed the nature of his government. He has studied the judicial psychology of the judges. He must be in a position to prevent and rectify the unconstitutional actions of the Government and the judiciary.

The gravest complaint against the Supreme Court of India is that it refuses to adjudicate 720 letters as per Article 39(a) of Constitution of India. There is no zipper clause in the Constitution of India to waive this provision. In fact, Article 39(a) is the heart of the Constitution of India. It is a problem to be solved and not arguments to be won.

This letter No.721

This letter is being submitted to the Supreme Court of India and the President of India through email.

V. Sabarimuthu

India 28-3-2019.