411
THE
CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA:
A
BARBARIC ACT?
The Supreme Court of India shall not
act illegally.
However, the court, at times, tends
to be unconstitutional.
The people point out this to the
court.
The Chief Justice of India (CJI) must
release this to the press.
Besides, he must take appropriate
action.
If the CJI is prone to corruption, he
would not do this.
Take the National Judicial Appointment Commission (NJAC) case.
The judgement could be
unconstitutional, if the letters sent in this regard remain hidden.
The CJI is solely responsible for
this.
It is not possible to fix responsibility
on any other person.
The Supreme Court of India, on 23
August 2015, held that the death penalty for heinous crimes is not a barbaric
one.
The bench comprised justices TS.Thakur, R.K.Agrawal and AK. Goel,
The Chief Justice of India murders
1000 million people every minute by concealing acts of corruption.
It is a barbaric act, if not a
heinous one.
Therefore, the court must define
heinous crimes.
This
is letter No.411.
This email is being submitted to
His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance
Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the
blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com on 24 August 2015
24-8--2015.
V. Sabarimuthu,
26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode,
Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.
No comments:
Post a Comment