547. The Supreme Court of India: Liberate 1000 million people

547

The Supreme Court of India: Liberate 1000 million people

          There are reports that the premium income of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) would exceed Re. 2 lakh crore during the financial year 2016-2017.

          The LIC extracts money from all over India. The effective return from the LIC is not even 10 per cent of the total amount paid as premium. Yet, many people want to be the policy holders of the LIC. There are many reasons for this.

          As the LIC is a Public Sector Undertaking (PSU), the people – as a rule- think that their investments are secure. They think that their investments would go for nation building.     Another reason is that the government gives a small income tax rebate for the investments in the LIC. 

Man is mortal. So he must leave something for his children in the event of his early death. This is another reason.

Further, the LIC tells the people that they would get a sizable amount of money after maturity. Many poor people consider investments in the LIC as a kind of saving. They seldom realize the simple fact that the money value would fall very rapidly.

What is important is the deployment of funds by the LIC.

Partly, due to the letters sent by the present man, the LIC stepped up its money deployment in government securities and Public Sector Undertakings.

However, one can discern a definite pattern in the utilization of the money.

It hands over a huge amount of money to about 10 people in the pretext of buying the shares of their companies. About 300 others get a small amount. It deployed about 3 lakh crore in the financial year 2015 to these companies. The beneficiaries buy back the shares as and when they get money. Therefore, the LIC does not hold more than, say, 10 per cent shares of any company. Only in rare cases, it holds up to 20 per cent shares of any company at a time. So the beneficiaries mint money without paying interest for the money obtained from the LIC.

There are over a million other entrepreneurs in India. They get nothing. If they want money, they must take loan. But the LIC says that people’s money is for people’s welfare. 

This vitiates Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

The beneficiaries rule India by keeping suitable men as political leaders. The words of the political leaders chosen by them alone are heard all over India.

The officers of the LIC also get suitable reward. Some get the reward in the form of post retirement placement in their companies with pay and allowances consistent with their degree of co-operation. These are acts of corruption.

The extraction of money by the LIC leads to flight of capital. It causes great economic deprivation all over India. This is a fraud on the Constitution of India.

The act of disturbing this system will be to the advantage of mankind.

But the beneficiaries control the mind of the judges of the Supreme Court of India.  So the judges fail to liberate 1000 million people from their present bondage. No wonder,  the Chief Justice of India does not acknowledge the letters from the citizens.

The result is that all attempts to free 1000 million people from their rule end in vain.

Therefore, the beneficiaries of the LIC continue to rule India through their chosen men.

This is letter No.546

   The facts from 28 February 2017 to 5 March 2017  are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 6-3-2017.

6- 3-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

546. Neduvasal Agitation

546

Neduvasal Agitation

          The Indian Army cancelled a recruitment examination due to question paper leakage. The media reported it on 27 February 2017.

          Distrust exists even in an examination conducted by the Indian Army.

          Evidently, there must be state wise reservation for all India seats like the IAS, IIFT, CAT, GATE. This is for social, educational and economic equality mentioned in the Constitution of India.

          The judges of the Supreme Court of India come from different states. What do they gain for themselves, for their own children, for their own communities or for own states by the present methods of selection? Will it cause any harm to anyone, if the seats are apportioned equitably? Why do they fail to understand this? Is it an intangible one? Why do they sow seeds of discord?

          An agitation is going on at Neduvasal in the Tamil Nadu State against the exploitation of natural gas by the public sector Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC). The Union Government had- in private interest- auctioned the exploration to the Great Eastern Energy Corporation Limited (GEECL) for virtually nothing.

          The Government of India must take over all natural assets and hand over them to the State Governments. The ONGC also must be split and handed over to the states. Let every state exploit the natural assets under their own Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs).

          Now the government exploits the natural assets only to hand over them to the private parties.

          If the natural assets are taken over by the government, we cannot survive. If we cannot control public mind, India would perish. This is the stand of the business houses.

          A Mr. Sekher Reddy had been removing the river sand in the Tamil Nadu State. He was arrested in a case. As a direct consequence, the sand prices increased from Re. 27000/- to Re. 38000/- per truck. The people are being forced to pay Re.11000 more for every truck of river sand.

          The natural assets must be given to the ruling class. Otherwise, the people must pay for it. This is the message of the manipulators.

This is letter No.546

   The facts that happened on 27 February 2017 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 28-2-2017.

28-2-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

545:The SBI merger. A fraud on the Constitution of India.

545

The SBI merger. A fraud on the Constitution of India.

          Mumbai is the richest city in India with a combined wealth of $ 820 billion. Delhi comes second with $ 450 billion and Bangaluru stands third with $320 billion.

          The financial institutions like the LIC, Banks drain the money all over India and empty it in Mumbai mainly in the pretext of buying shares.  The companies buy-back the shares after multiplying their wealth leaving the financial institutions with virtually nothing. This is a fraud on the Constitution of India. The Supreme Court of India alone can prevent it.

          The organizers of Marina Uprising have started a political party. A daily, Thina Thanthi, reported it on 26 February 2017. The other newspapers and the TV channels blacked this out.

          If the Supreme court of India had asked the media the reason for concealing this work from the eye of the people, the present man would have become the Prime Minister of India long ago. The system should not do this to everyone.

          Therefore, the Supreme Court of India must direct the media to disclose the brain behind the uprising and report his words for at least five years to know about his capabilities.   

            If it is not feasible of compliance, it must tell why other leaders are being heard.

          Former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu Mr. Paneerselvam, on 26 February 2017, said that he wanted to rescue Tamil Nadu from Ms. Sasikala family.

          The ruling class of Tamil Nadu is slightly different from Ms. Sasikala family because it is the back room player of every political party.

          Some people take the natural assets and the public money of Tamil Nadu. They are the ruling class.

          This ruling class mint unlimited money and controls the political parties and the public mind.

          Apparently, some TV channels are under the control of   Ms. Sasikala. But, those channels are not free. If they are free, she would not have gone to jail.

          Even now, she prefers to remain in jail rather than contributing her share for the freedom of Indians.

          Mr. Paneerselvam solved two or three day-to-day problems during his stint as chief minister. But he did not touch the core issues. Now, he must explain how he is distinguished by devotion to public duty.

          The President of the USA, Mr. Donald Trump, says that a wall would be constructed along the Mexico- USA border to prevent illegal migration. Further, he vowed to punish American companies for moving jobs.

          He wants to make everything in the USA. Where will he go for the unskilled labour force? The USA would suffer due to the proposed border wall.

          An Indian engineer, Mr. Srinivas was shot dead in the USA on 24 February 2017. This is shocking news. Perhaps, President of the USA Mr.Trump does not distinguish the legal migrants from illegal migrants. A part of the reason is Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi. The reason was given earlier.

The Union Government, on 22 February 2017, issued a gazette notification for the merger of the State Bank of India (SBI) with its five associate banks. According to the notification, the merger is on 1 April 2017. The media sparingly reported this on 26 February 2017.

          It is clear that the Supreme Court of India did not take any suitable action over the Letter No. 543 dated 16 -2-2017.

          It should have, at least, asked the media the reason for not disclosing the contents of the letter to the people. This would have given birth to a new democratic order.

          It did not do so. It did not understand the right to freedom. The present Chief Justice of India and the other judges must severally and collectively accept responsibility for the unconstitutional merger and for keeping India as a monopoly of a few people.

          Actually, it is another fraud on the Constitution of India.

This is letter No.545

   The facts from 23 February 2017 to 26 February 2017 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 27-2-2017.

27-2-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

544. The Biggest Contractor

544

The Biggest Contractor

Former Union Minister Mr. Subramonia Swamy, on 20 February 2017, alleged that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Directorate of Enforcement (ED) and the Department of Income Tax (IT) did not act upon his complaint against former Union Minister Mr. P. Chithambaram and his son, Mr. Karthi Chithambaram, due the pressure exerted by the system. He added that he had submitted a list of 21 secret bank accounts of the father son duo to the above agencies.

If his revelations are true, Mr. P. Chithambaram utilized every minute of his service to mint money. Naturally, he possesses assets disproportionate to his known sources of income and this far exceeds the assets of Ms. Jayalalithaa.

One would say that the cases are not proved as in the case of Ms. Jayalalithaa.

But, the CBI has not proved any case against any member of the ruling class. The case against Ms. Jayalalithaa was proved because the state police and officers pursued it.

Evidently, the recent verdict against Jayalalithaa vitiates Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

The New Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, Mr. K. Palanisamai, on his Day-1 at work, cleared five key welfare measures. He allotted Re. 2400 crore for drought relief.

Further, he allotted Re.200 crore for the women to buy two wheelers. According to this scheme, Re. 20,000 each would be granted as subsidy to one lakh working women every year for the purchase of two wheelers of their own choice.

It is customary for the state government to buy wet grinders, TVs and other items in bulk for the people with an eye on commission.

Now, the new government has decided to give money to individuals through banks. The ministers are not likely to get commission. The traders will be benefitted and the economic activity will increase.

The money allotted for farmers also is to directly go into their bank accounts.

The departure from the customary style must be welcomed by one and all.

If all purchases are delegated to the entities in the district level, there will be a sea change in the economic activity in Tamil Nadu.

A reporter asked whether he would nationalize sand mining or not. The Chief Minister evaded the question. After watching this, some people said that he is only a contractor to the ruling class of Tamil Nadu to collect money from the manipulators.

However, a minister said that the licences for sand mining were granted by the Union government.

It is a sensitive matter. The media picked up courage to report it. The Union Government does not expect a minister to utter any word over it.

The United Front (UF) Government under Mr. H.D. Deve Gowda delegated the power to grant mining licences to the State Governments. Now, the Union Government and the State Governments vie with one another to alienate the public resources without a law in place.

The Prime Minister is not ready to restore all public resources. In fact, he handed over some public resources to some private parties in very bad faith.

What does he get in return?

Apparently, he is not after foreign banks. But he got his present position for virtually nothing. The cloth he wears is so fine in texture that some people in some place spend not less than Re. one lakh per day. This is nothing but corrupt money.

Therefore, the people would consider him as the biggest contractor in India.

This condition would continue until the people get political freedom and legal equality.

This is letter No.544

   The facts from 16 February 2017 to 22 February 2017 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 23-2-2017.

23-2-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

543:The Supreme Court of India: Breaking the spirit of the people?

543

The Supreme Court of India: Breaking the spirit of the people?

The Department of Income Tax (IT) carried out raids on the houses of an MLA in the Karnataka State and found documents and gold for about Re.150 crore on 13 February 2017. The MLA is a close friend of the Chief Minister of Karnataka.

 Justice Karnan of the Culcutta High Court had submitted a list of the corrupt judges to the Prime Minister of India. A seven-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India headed by Chief Justice JS. Khehar asked Justice Karnan to appear before it for contempt. To this, Justice Karnan said that the upper caste judges take law in their hands and misuse judicial power with the mala fide intention of getting rid of him. He rejected the order of the court on 13 February 2017.

A Supreme Court of India bench of Justices P.C. Ghose and Amitava Roy restored in toto the trial court conviction of Ms. Jayalalithaa (late), Ms. Sasikala, Ms. Ilavarasi and Mr. Sudhakaran. Trial court judge Michael D’Cunha had sentenced them to four years imprisonment.

The judgement is partly constitutional and partly unconstitutional.

          The people in villages had been using ribald language against the Supreme Court of India until this judgement. Now they say that the corrupt would be punished one day or other. They add that there is justice in one corner.

          The judgement, in its present form, would outwardly remain as a deterrent for corruption. Actually, it would encourage acts of corruption partly because the probability of getting such direct documentary evidences would be rare and partly because the court does not enforce freedom of expression..

The court will have to condone the jail term, if the people have freedom. As a consequence, a lot of good things would follow.

Now, it is shocking that the court failed to take into account some important points mentioned in this work.

The Union Government, on 15 February 2017, decided to merge five associate banks with the State Bank of India (SBI). Earlier, Union Finance Minister Mr. Arun Jaitely said that the SBI would be a global player, controlling 25 per cent of the Indian banking industry, after the merger.

The Union Government must envisage every state as another Japan, Hong Hong, Korea or Singapore. For this, every financial institution must be split and handed over to the state governments. Instead, the government wants to drain money from every state.

The associates of the SBI lend about 90 per cent of their deposits in their respective regions.

In contrast, the SBI lends about 10 per cent of its deposits in its various regions and siphons off the rest to Mumbai.

Further, in contrast to the associate banks, the SBI is not accessible to the small farmers.

Furthermore, every associate of the SBI has its own heritage value. This must be conserved.

The unconstitutional nature of the merger was mentioned earlier in this work. The government, at that time, retracted.

Now, the political leaders do not oppose the merger.

Why do you keep this work away from the eye of the people? If the court had asked this question to the media, the government would not have taken the above decision.

As it does not do this, the exploitation of the masses continues.

Thus, the court breaks the spirit of the people.

This is letter No.543

   The facts from 11 February 2017 to 15 February 2017 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 16-2-2017.

16-2-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

542.The Supreme Court of India: Robbing the people of all real freedom?

The Supreme Court of India: Robbing the people of all real freedom?

The Supreme Court of India, on 31 January 2017, refused to stay the Jallikattu Law enacted by the Government of Tamil Nadu. Further, the court revealed that slogans were raised against the Supreme Court of India during the Marina Uprising. The court considered this as ’an intolerable act’.

Similarly, Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu Mr. Paneerselvam disclosed that the protesters carried some placards criticizing him.  

Some other political leaders now say that the media did not report their visit to Marina during the uprising.

          Evidently, the media did not reveal the words used by the protesters against the Supreme Court during the Marina Uprising.

          Many other activities of the crowd also were not revealed as and when they happened.

          This shows that the Supreme Court and the Chief Minister were privileged to know news and views and not the people as a body.

          The court could have asked the media the reason for not revealing this to the people.

          It did not do so.

This shows that the present Chief Justice of India also is not ready to mark a new era of hope in the life of India.

          The Union Budget for 2017-2018 was presented to the Parliament on 1 February 2017.

          The money extracted from the people for imports – mentioned earlier in this work- does not, apparently, reflect in the receipts.

What happens to this money?

Or what happened to the money in the Provident Fund (PF)?

Does not the government drain India of her wealth?

Does the Chief Justice of India know this?

          The Government does not want the people to know this because this money goes directly into the hands of some manipulators.

          The Budget allotted Re. 48000 crore to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS).

          This is an ongoing scheme.

          The coolies did not get job even for two days per week.  The present man told this to the government. Many more complementary things were pointed out to the government. At last, the government introduced the above scheme. Therefore, the name given to the above scheme is not an appropriate one.

The Budget allotted Re.27000 crore for housing. This also is an ongoing scheme.

Everyone wants to construct a house. The government could have taken a decision to give a definite amount directly to the below poverty line people as and when they construct new houses.

Now, about 34 per cent would reach the beneficiaries and the rest would be consumed by the middle men.

The government considered the suggestion given in this regard as a populist measure. In fact, it is a decision taken in bad faith. Such things would not happen if there is freedom  

          Further, the budget is virtually silent about the demonetization.

          Not much black money was unearthed from the Mumbai region after demonetization. There is no spurt in the foreign exchange reserves. Illegal transactions continue as before.

          Above all, the containers containing new currency notes were transmitted to some people without keeping any account. The Supreme Court of India does not want the competent authorities to reveal the nature of the illegal transactions.

          Now, the banks cannot show demonetized currency notes for the deposits because the notes were not exchanged through bank counters.

          Thus, the demonetization is fast becoming a method of further draining India of her wealth.

          In the context of demonetization and the imports, one would say that the Budget for 2017-2018 is the worst Budget.

Former Union Minister Mr. Subramonia Swamy, on 11 February 2017, described the delay taken by the Governor of Tamil Nadu to install a government as an unconstitutional one.

          This is not a question of Constitution because there is no freedom to the people to choose their own representatives.

          Therefore, all governments are illegitimate in nature.

          It may be recalled that former Union Minister Mr. T.T. Krishnamachari requested Mr. JRD Tata to remove the iron ore from Jamshedpur and rule India.

          Similarly, the chief ministers ask their friends and relatives to remove the public resources.

          What will the beneficiaries do with the unlimited money? They would spend a part among the political leaders, IAS officers, judges, friends and relatives. They would spend another part to control the public mind. They would spread the rest all over the world.

          The present struggle is nothing but a struggle for public money.

          Ms. Sasikala, a leader of the AIDMK party, said that the Chief Minister Mr. Paneerselvam was leaning towards the DMK party. The latter retorted that the former had secretly obtained certain licences   from the DMK Government.

          Further, Chief Minister Mr. Paneerselvam has not taken over the public resources after assuming power.

          Evidently, there are no differences between one political party and the other in the matter of draining the public resources.

The Governor of Tamil Nadu, on 13 February 2017, rejected the claim of Ms. Sasikala, a leader of the ruling AIADMK party, to form a government in the Tamil Nadu state. He cited the impending verdict of the Supreme Court of India in the disproportionate assets case.

All unexplained assets over a certain maximum are nothing but the proceeds from acts of corruption. Further, the case against Ms. Sasikala is a proved one and the Supreme Court of India cannot disprove it without invoking obscure sections.

The political leaders amass wealth only with the knowledge of the Supreme Court of India. However, the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) selectively attaches the assets of some people like Jagamohan Reddy. Therefore, the case is a highly complex one. The court has taken seven months to deliver the judgement because of the complex nature of the case. The Governor has placed a new constraint on the court.

The Members of Parliament and the Assembly can select their leader only once. If their leader dies or resigns, they will again get a chance to select another leader. But they don’t have the luxury to force or coerce their own leader and substitute him with another man. When such things happen as in the case of Mr. Paneerselvam, the President/Governor must ask the leader of the opposition party to explore the possibility of forming a government or dissolve the Parliament/ Assembly. The court will have its own view is a different matter.

There are reports that the Supreme Court of India appointed former Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), Mr. Vinod Roy, as the president of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI).

          It is a decision taken in very bad faith by the new Chief Justice of India,.

          Mr. Vinod Roy, as the CAG, projected the notional loss suffered by the exchequer due to the first come- first serve policy of the Dr.Manmohan Singh Government while allotting the 2G spectrum. At the same time, he suppressed the similar loss due to the similar policy pursued by the Mr.Vajpayee Government. He did it in bad faith and this fact was mentioned earlier in this work.

          Therefore, the decision of the court is an unconstitutional one. It is a reward for helping the manipulators to usurp the public resources. The order must be repealed forthwith.

          This happens because the Chief Justice of India robs the people of all real freedom.

This is letter No.542

   The facts from 27 January 2017 to 10 February 2017 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 11-2-2017.

11-2-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India. 

.

         

541. Marina Uprising and the Supreme Court of India

541

The Marina Uprising and the Supreme Court of India.

          The present man sent the last letter, on 21 January 2017, just to prevent any outward incident anywhere in Tamil Nadu as a result of the Marina Uprising.

          Unfortunately, the letter triggered some outward incidents on 22 January 2017.

          There was a sea of humanity on the Marina beach. Many put the number around 15 lakh. If the Chief Justice of India had openly agreed to redress their genuine grievances, everyone might have left the place very happily.

          Apparently, the Chief Justice of India asked a retired judge to assuage the feelings of the people. The latter described the problem as a question of law and indirectly tried to impart a good image to the judiciary.

           However, different sections of the crowd dared to place other demands such as the public resources as mentioned in the last letter. Due to the thinking that any more defeat would mean eternal disgrace, the police was asked to disperse the crowd forcefully. The police being police made a day of it.

          Thus the uprising came to an end after six days.

          At one stage, a section of the crowd threatened to jump into the sea. The waves washed away only one boy. Had the police pushed them further, the sea might have consumed a large number of people.

          Further, the police kept their guns in their vans and no firing occurred.

          The demands of the crowd had all India character. They were directed against the Supreme Court of India.

Further, one cannot stand on the sea-shore for more than two hours. The crowd was there for six days. It is perilous to sit before an unpredictable sea. No child should have lost his precious life for a national cause.

On the whole, Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu Mr. Paneerselvam must be commended for the way he handled the situation mainly because of the latent nature of the real enemy. In fact, all right thinking people heaved a sigh of relief. The Supreme Court of India is indebted to him in this matter.

However, the Supreme Court of India shall not defeat the purpose of the uprising.    

It must be stated that the Supreme Court of India considers many constitutional things as unconstitutional and vice versa.

          Therefore, everyone thinks something is wrong in some place. As the media shields the judiciary, the people are unable to pin point the real culprit. 

          It is a well known fact that the mark obtained by a candidate in an examination is not the sole index of intelligence.  Therefore, state wise reservation is a must for the IITs, IIMs, IIFT, All India Services and for the Public Sector Undertakings such as banks.

The judges of the Supreme Court of India hail from different places in India. What harm would it accrue to them if they give to their own children in Punjab, Kerala, Kashmir and Assam a definite share in the total seats? Will it do any injustice to anyone? Does anything in the Constitution prohibit this? Is it not the spirit of the Constitution of India? Does not Article 16 demand it? Does the nation require an uprising for it?

          The public resources must be for public welfare. But the court enables a few people to exploit everything, deny democracy and allow them to rule India.

          These were the most important demands of the protesters. The courts- in effect- ironically depict the protesters as anti-social elements and sit in a safe distance.

          The present Chief Justice of India would not openly accept responsibility for the uprising. However, he must realize his responsibility and redress all the genuine grievances of the people before his retirement.

          The sea washed away a boy. Apparently, it happened during the police action. A memorial near the existing memorials at Marina is a must for that boy because he sacrificed his life for all Indians. The Chief Justice of India must see this also before his retirement.          

          The High Court, Chennai and the National Human Rights Commission, on 25 January 2017, sent notices to explain the human rights violations during the Marina uprising.

          As the people did not create any law and order problem by sitting before the High Court or the Human Rights Commission, the court could send notice like this. This deflects the attention of the people to other matters.

          In fact, the courts and the Human Rights Commission created this situation by denying democracy.

          Former judge of the Supreme Court of India Santosh Hegde, on 25 January 2017, wanted to know the source of Re.160  crore worth assets of a political leader in the Karnataka state.

           Mr. Hegde functioned as a judge of the Supreme Court of India from 1999 to 2005. During this period, he helped convert a number of Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) into private assets. In fact, maximum manipulations occurred during his stint in the court.

Further, a judge of the Supreme Court would understand the nature of a case before him within 10 minutes. But he concealed all letters received from the present man. Now he talks like this!

         

          Former Union Minister Mr. Sarad Pawar was conferred a Padma award on 26 January 2017.

          The Wikileaks said that he had a huge amount of money in the foreign banks.  Mr. Pawar did not deny this allegation. The Supreme Court of India did not give him a clean chit either. 

          Many other leaders keep a huge amount of money in the foreign banks. They also might be given suitable awards consistent with their money.

         

The Association for Democratic Reforms, on 26 January 2017, said that the Indian political parties are receiving a huge amount of money from unknown sources. It put their total income from 2005 to 20014 at Re.11,367 crore. Even small parties received over Re.200 crore during this period.

          The income is not from unknown sources. Every IAS officer and every judge of the Supreme Court and High Court knew this. Or, the CBI will tell the source within 24 hours.

          Every person in charge of removing the public resources is the source. But they are super Sekher Reddy like people. The Supreme Court of India protects them because its objective - till date- is denial of freedom. The present Chief Justice of India might change it.

This is letter No.541

   The facts from 22 January 2017 to 26 January 2017 are being submitted to His Excellency the President of India, Supreme Court of India, Chief Vigilance Commissioner, Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, and posted in the blog: www.howeverythinghappenedinindia.blogspot.com  on 27-1-2017.

27-1-2017.

V. Sabarimuthu,

26-3 Thattamkonam, Vellicode, Mulagumoodu PIN: 629167, India.